Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:34:29.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 14 - Use of Cryopreserved Sperm and ART after Chemotherapy or Radiotherapy

from Section 4 - Fertility Preservation Strategies in the Male

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2021

By
Ryan Flannigan ,
Elizabeth Grill  and
Peter N Schlegel
Edited by
Jacques Donnez  and
S. Samuel Kim
Jacques Donnez
Affiliation:
Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels
S. Samuel Kim
Affiliation:
University of Kansas School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

Recent advances in the treatment of cancer have led to greater longevity among men in reproductive ages with a 75% five-year cancer survival rate in boys aged 15 years or younger [1] and 66% among men aged 15–44 [2]. There is increased recognition that quality of life including paternity is significant issues for cancer survivors. We will focus primarily on patients with testicular cancer and lymphoma that generally affects younger patients in the reproductive window with an excellent overall survival. However, one must realize in our modern society the age of desiring paternity has increased due to postponement of marriage as well as for other social reasons. Therefore, this chapter will focus not only on those who completed chemotherapy as children but adult cancer patients as well.

Type
Chapter
Information
Fertility Preservation
Principles and Practice
 , pp. 153 - 170
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Landis, NT. Pharmacy technician helps cancer patients look good. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 1999;56(3):208.Google Scholar
Sant, M, Aareleid, T, Berrino, F et al. EUROCARE-3: survival of cancer patients diagnosed 1990–94–results and commentary. Ann Oncol, 2003;14(Suppl5):v61–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia, JM, Li, H, Mann, D et al. Hypogonadism in male patients with cancer. Cancer, 2006;106(12):2583–2591.Google Scholar
Rajagopal, A, Vassilopoulou-Sellin, R, Palmer, JL, Kaur, G, Bruera, E. Symptomatic hypogonadism in male survivors of cancer with chronic exposure to opioids. Cancer, 2004;100(4):851–858.Google Scholar
Tisdale, MJ. Cachexia in cancer patients. Nat Rev Cancer, 2002;2(11):862–871.Google Scholar
Pfitzenmaier, J, Vessella, R, Higano, CS et al. Elevation of cytokine levels in cachectic patients with prostate carcinoma. Cancer, 2003;97(5):1211–1216.Google Scholar
Watson, ME, Newman, RJ, Payne, AM, Abdelrahim, M, Francis, GL. The effect of macrophage conditioned media on Leydig cell function. Ann Clin Lab Sci, 1994;24(1):84–95.Google Scholar
Turnbull, AV, Rivier, C. Inhibition of gonadotropin-induced testosterone secretion by the intracerebroventricular injection of interleukin-1 beta in the male rat. Endocrinology, 1997;138(3):1008–1013.Google Scholar
Afane, M, Dubost, JJ, Sauvezie, B et al. Modulation of Leydig cell testosterone production by secretory products of macrophages. Andrologia, 1998;30(2):71–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kluge, M, Schussler, P, Uhr, M, Yassouridis, A, Steiger, A. Ghrelin suppresses secretion of luteinizing hormone in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2007;92(8):3202–3205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lanfranco, F, Bonelli, L, Baldi, M et al. Acylated ghrelin inhibits spontaneous luteinizing hormone pulsatility and responsiveness to naloxone but not that to gonadotropin-releasing hormone in young men: evidence for a central inhibitory action of ghrelin on the gonadal axis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2008;93(9):3633–3639.Google Scholar
Burney, BO, Garcia, JM. Hypogonadism in male cancer patients. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle, 2012;3(3):149–155.Google Scholar
Fraser, LA, Morrison, D, Morley-Forster, P et al. Oral opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: higher prevalence of hypogonadism in men than in women. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes, 2009;117(1):38–43.Google Scholar
Mendelson, JH, Ellingboe, J, Judson, BA, Goldstein, A. Plasma testosterone and luteinizing hormone levels during levo-alpha-acetylmethadol maintenance and withdrawal. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 1984;35(4):545–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howell, SJ, Radford, JA, Ryder, WD, Shalet, SM. Testicular function after cytotoxic chemotherapy: evidence of Leydig cell insufficiency. J Clin Oncol, 1999;17(5):1493–1498.Google Scholar
Stuart, NS, Woodroffe, CM, Grundy, R, Cullen, MH. Long-term toxicity of chemotherapy for testicular cancer–the cost of cure. Br J Cancer, 1990;61(3):479–484.Google Scholar
Dueland, S, Guren, MG, Olsen, DR, Poulsen, JP, Magne Tveit, K. Radiation therapy induced changes in male sex hormone levels in rectal cancer patients. Radiother Oncol, 2003;68(3):249–253.Google Scholar
Oakberg, EF. Sensitivity and time of degeneration of spermatogenic cells irradiated in various stages of maturation in the mouse. Radiat Res, 1955;2(4):369–391.Google Scholar
Meistrich, ML, Finch, M, da Cunha, MF, Hacker, U, Au, WW. Damaging effects of fourteen chemotherapeutic drugs on mouse testis cells. Cancer Res, 1982;42(1):122–131.Google Scholar
Wallace, WH, Anderson, RA, Irvine, DS. Fertility preservation for young patients with cancer: who is at risk and what can be offered? Lancet Oncol, 2005;6(4):209–218.Google Scholar
Meistrich, ML. Effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy on spermatogenesis in humans. Fertil Steril, 2013;100(5):1180–1186.Google Scholar
Mariani, S, Basciani, S, Fabbri, A et al. Severe oligozoospermia in a young man with chronic myeloid leukemia on long-term treatment with imatinib started before puberty. Fertil Steril, 2011;95(3):1120e1115–1127.Google Scholar
Seshadri, T, Seymour, JF, McArthur, GA. Oligospermia in a patient receiving imatinib therapy for the hypereosinophilic syndrome. N Engl J Med, 2004;351(20):2134–2135.Google Scholar
Borgmann-Staudt, A, Rendtorff, R, Reinmuth, S et al. Fertility after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in childhood and adolescence. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2012;47(2):271–276.Google Scholar
Meistrich, ML, Wilson, G, Mathur, K et al. Rapid recovery of spermatogenesis after mitoxantrone, vincristine, vinblastine, and prednisone chemotherapy for Hodgkin’s disease. J Clin Oncol, 1997;15(12):3488–3495.Google Scholar
Lass, A, Akagbosu, F, Abusheikha, N et al. A programme of semen cryopreservation for patients with malignant disease in a tertiary infertility centre: lessons from 8 years’ experience. Hum Reprod, 1998;13(11):3256–3261.Google Scholar
Ragni, G, Somigliana, E, Restelli, L et al.Sperm banking and rate of assisted reproduction treatment: insights from a 15-year cryopreservation program for male cancer patients. Cancer, 2003;97(7):1624–1629.Google Scholar
Oktay, K, Harvey, BE, Partridge, AH et al. Fertility preservation in patients with cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol, 2018;36(19):1994–2001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zebrack, BJ, Casillas, J, Nohr, L, Adams, H, Zeltzer, LK. Fertility issues for young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Psychooncology, 2004;13(10):689–699.Google Scholar
Schover, LR, Brey, K, Lichtin, A, Lipshultz, LI, Jeha, S. Knowledge and experience regarding cancer, infertility, and sperm banking in younger male survivors. J Clin Oncol, 2002;20(7):1880–1889.Google Scholar
Schover, LR, Rybicki, LA, Martin, BA, Bringelsen, KA. Having children after cancer. A pilot survey of survivors’ attitudes and experiences. Cancer, 1999;86(4):697–709.Google Scholar
Schover, LR, Brey, K, Lichtin, A, Lipshultz, LI, Jeha, S. Oncologists’ attitudes and practices regarding banking sperm before cancer treatment. J Clin Oncol, 2002;20(7):1890–1897.Google Scholar
Glaser, AW, Phelan, L, Crawshaw, M, Jagdev, S, Hale, J. Fertility preservation in adolescent males with cancer in the United Kingdom: a survey of practice. Arch Dis Child, 2004;89(8):736–737.Google Scholar
Heath, JA, Stern, CJ. Fertility preservation in children newly diagnosed with cancer: existing standards of practice in Australia and New Zealand. Med J Aust, 2006;185(10):538–541.Google Scholar
Kelleher, S, Wishart, SM, Liu, PY et al. Long-term outcomes of elective human sperm cryostorage. Hum Reprod, 2001;16(12):2632–2639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackhall, FH, Atkinson, AD, Maaya, MB et al. Semen cryopreservation, utilisation and reproductive outcome in men treated for Hodgkin’s disease. Br J Cancer, 2002;87(4):381–384.Google Scholar
Agarwal, A, Ranganathan, P, Kattal, N et al. Fertility after cancer: a prospective review of assisted reproductive outcome with banked semen specimens. Fertil Steril, 2004;81(2):342–348.Google Scholar
Forbes, CM, Flannigan, R, Schlegel, PN. Spermatogonial stem cell transplantation and male infertility: Current status and future directions. Arab J Urol, 2018;16(1):171–180.Google Scholar
Sandeman, TF. The effects of x irradiation on male human fertility. Br J Radiol, 1966;39(468):901–907.Google Scholar
Castillo, LA, Craft, AW, Kernahan, J, Evans, RG, Aynsley-Green, A. Gonadal function after 12-Gy testicular irradiation in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Med Pediatr Oncol, 1990;18(3):185–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shalet, SM, Tsatsoulis, A, Whitehead, E, Read, G. Vulnerability of the human Leydig cell to radiation damage is dependent upon age. J Endocrinol, 1989;120(1):161–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marmor, D, Grob-Menendez, F, Duyck, F, Delafontaine, D. Very late return of spermatogenesis after chlorambucil therapy: case reports. Fertil Steril, 1992;58(4):845–846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, KL, Larsen, E, Bangsboll, S et al. Assisted reproduction in male cancer survivors: fertility treatment and outcome in 67 couples. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(12):2806–2810.Google Scholar
Kader, HA, Rostom, AY. Follicle stimulating hormone levels as a predictor of recovery of spermatogenesis following cancer therapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), 1991;3(1):37–40.Google Scholar
Ramasamy, R, Lin, K, Gosden, LV et al. High serum FSH levels in men with nonobstructive azoospermia does not affect success of microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Fertil Steril, 2009;92(2):590–593.Google Scholar
Alfano, M, Ventimiglia, E, Locatelli, I et al. Anti-Mullerian hormone-to-testosterone ratio is predictive of positive sperm retrieval in men with idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia. Sci Rep, 2017;7(1):17638.Google Scholar
Zhang, S, Du, J, Tian, R et al. Assessment of the use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in guiding microdissection testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia. BMC Urol, 2018;18(1):48.Google Scholar
Kop, PA, van Wely, M, Mol, BW et al. Intrauterine insemination or intracervical insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: a cohort study. Hum Reprod, 2015;30(3):603–607.Google Scholar
Hourvitz, A, Goldschlag, DE, Davis, OK et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using cryopreserved sperm from men with malignant neoplasm yields high pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril, 2008;90(3):557–563.Google Scholar
Dohle, GR. Male infertility in cancer patients: Review of the literature. Int J Urol, 2010;17(4):327–331.Google Scholar
Botchan, A, Karpol, S, Lehavi, O et al. Preservation of sperm of cancer patients: extent of use and pregnancy outcome in a tertiary infertility center. Asian J Androl, 2013;15(3):382–386.Google Scholar
Spermon, JR, Ramos, L, Wetzels, AM et al. Sperm integrity pre- and post-chemotherapy in men with testicular germ cell cancer. Hum Reprod, 2006;21(7):1781–1786.Google Scholar
Berthelsen, JG, Skakkebaek, NE. Gonadal function in men with testis cancer. Fertil Steril, 1983;39(1):68–75.Google Scholar
Sanger, WG, Armitage, JO, Schmidt, MA. Feasibility of semen cryopreservation in patients with malignant disease. JAMA, 1980;244(8):789–790.Google Scholar
Viviani, S, Ragni, G, Santoro, A et al. Testicular dysfunction in Hodgkin’s disease before and after treatment. Eur J Cancer, 1991;27(11):1389–1392.Google Scholar
Khalifa, E, Oehninger, S, Acosta, AA et al. Successful fertilization and pregnancy outcome in in-vitro fertilization using cryopreserved/thawed spermatozoa from patients with malignant diseases. Hum Reprod, 1992;7(1):105–108.Google Scholar
Padron, OF, Sharma, RK, Thomas, A, Jr., Agarwal, A. Effects of cancer on spermatozoa quality after cryopreservation: a 12-year experience. Fertil Steril, 1997;67(2):326–331.Google Scholar
Schrader, M, Muller, M, Sofikitis, N et al. “Onco-tese”: testicular sperm extraction in azoospermic cancer patients before chemotherapy-new guidelines? Urology, 2003;61(2):421–425.Google Scholar
Abumelha, S, Poullis, C, Almashat, F et al. Microdissection onco-TESE in men with azoospermia and cancer. European Urology, 2016;Supplement 15(3):e185.Google Scholar
Baniel, J, Sella, A. Sperm extraction at orchiectomy for testis cancer. Fertil Steril, 2001;75(2):260–262.Google Scholar
Carmignani, L, Gadda, F, Gazzano, G et al. Testicular sperm extraction in cancerous testicle in patients with azoospermia: a case report. Hum Reprod, 2007;22(4):1068–1072.Google Scholar
Descombe, L, Chauleur, C, Gentil-Perret, A et al. Testicular sperm extraction in a single cancerous testicle in patients with azoospermia: a case report. Fertil Steril, 2008;90(2):443e441–444.Google Scholar
Kohn, FM, Schroeder-Printzen, I, Weidner, W et al. Testicular sperm extraction in a patient with metachronous bilateral testicular cancer. Hum Reprod, 2001;16(11):2343–2346.Google Scholar
De Mas, P, Daudin, M, Vincent, MC et al. Increased aneuploidy in spermatozoa from testicular tumour patients after chemotherapy with cisplatin, etoposide and bleomycin. Hum Reprod, 2001;16(6):1204–1208.Google Scholar
Rives, N, Walschaerts, M, Setif, V et al. Sperm aneuploidy after testicular cancer treatment: data from a prospective multicenter study performed within the French Centre d’Etude et de Conservation des Oeufs et du Sperme network. Fertil Steril, 2017;107(3):580–588 e581.Google Scholar
Smit, M, van Casteren, NJ, Wildhagen, MF, Romijn, JC, Dohle, GR. Sperm DNA integrity in cancer patients before and after cytotoxic treatment. Hum Reprod, 2010;25(8):1877–1883.Google Scholar
Brydoy, M, Fossa, SD, Klepp, O et al. Paternity following treatment for testicular cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2005;97(21):1580–1588.Google Scholar
Ohl, DA, Denil, J, Bennett, CJ et al. Electroejaculation following retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. J Urol, 1991;145(5):980–983.Google Scholar
Hultling, C, Rosenlund, B, Tornblom, M et al. Transrectal electroejaculation in combination with in-vitro fertilization: an effective treatment of anejaculatory infertility after testicular cancer. Hum Reprod, 1995;10(4):847–850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, PH, Palermo, G, Schlegel, PN et al. The use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection with electroejaculates from anejaculatory men. Hum Reprod, 1998;13(7):1854–1858.Google Scholar
Rosenlund, B, Sjoblom, P, Tornblom, M, Hultling, C, Hillensjo, T. In-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the treatment of infertility after testicular cancer. Hum Reprod, 1998;13(2):414–418.Google Scholar
Schlegel, PN. Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum Reprod, 1999;14(1):131–135.Google Scholar
Schoor, RA, Elhanbly, S, Niederberger, CS, Ross, LS. The role of testicular biopsy in the modern management of male infertility. J Urol, 2002;167(1):197–200.Google Scholar
Tsujimura, A, Matsumiya, K, Miyagawa, Y et al. Conventional multiple or microdissection testicular sperm extraction: a comparative study. Hum Reprod, 2002;17(11):2924–2929.Google Scholar
Su, LM, Palermo, GD, Goldstein, M et al. Testicular sperm extraction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for nonobstructive azoospermia: testicular histology can predict success of sperm retrieval. J Urol, 1999;161(1):112–116.Google Scholar
Ramasamy, R, Schlegel, PN. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: effect of prior biopsy on success of sperm retrieval. J Urol, 2007;177(4):1447–1449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramasamy, R, Yagan, N, Schlegel, PN. Structural and functional changes to the testis after conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Urology, 2005;65(6):1190–1194.Google Scholar
Hsiao, W, Stahl, PJ, Osterberg, EC et al. Successful treatment of postchemotherapy azoospermia with microsurgical testicular sperm extraction: the Weill Cornell experience. J Clin Oncol, 2011;29(12):1607–1611.Google Scholar
Damani, MN, Master, V, Meng, MV et al. Postchemotherapy ejaculatory azoospermia: fatherhood with sperm from testis tissue with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Clin Oncol, 2002;20(4):930–936.Google Scholar
Meseguer, M, Garrido, N, Remohi, J et al. Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and ICSI in patients with permanent azoospermia after chemotherapy. Hum Reprod, 2003;18(6):1281–1285.Google Scholar
Daniels, K. Donor Insemination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Ethics Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Informing offspring of their conception by gamete or embryo donation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril, 2013;100(1):45–49.Google Scholar
Ethics ETFo. Law. III. Gamete and embryo donation. Hum Reprod, 2002;17(5):1407–1408.Google Scholar
Boivin, J, Appleton, TC, Baetens, P et al. Guidelines for counselling in infertility: outline version. Hum Reprod, 2001;16(6):1301–1304.Google Scholar
Covington, SN. The role of the mental health professional in reproductive medicine. Fertil Steril, 1995;64(5):895–897.Google Scholar
Greenfeld, DA. Does psychological support and counseling reduce the stress experienced by couples involved in assisted reproductive technology? J Assist Reprod Genet, 1997;14(4):186–188.Google Scholar
Applegarth, L. The psychological aspects of infertility. In Keye, W, Chang, R, Rebar, R, Soules, M (eds.) Infertility: Evaluation and Treatment. Vol 25–41. Philadelphia: Saunders. 1995.Google Scholar
Leiblum, S, Greenfeld, D. The course of infertility: immediate and long-term reactions. In Leiblum, S (ed.) Infertility: Psychological Issues and Counseling Strategies. New York: Wiley. 1997, 83–92.Google Scholar
Greenfeld, D. Recipient counseling for oocyte donation. In Burns, L, Covington, S (eds.) Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians. New York: Parthenon Publishing Group. 1999, 435–455.Google Scholar
Frith, L. Beneath the rhetoric: the role of rights in the practice of non-anonymous gamete donation. Bioethics, 2001;15(5–6):473–484.Google Scholar
Mahlstedt, PP, Greenfeld, DA. Assisted reproductive technology with donor gametes: the need for patient preparation. Fertil Steril, 1989;52(6):908–914.Google Scholar
Gong, D, Liu, YL, Zheng, Z, Tian, YF, Li, Z. An overview on ethical issues about sperm donation. Asian J Androl, 2009;11(6):645–652.Google Scholar
Thorn, P. Recipient counseling for donor insemination. In Covington, S, Burns, L (eds.) Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2006.Google Scholar
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Using family members as gamete donors or surrogates. Fertil Steril, 2012;98(4):797–803.Google Scholar
Applegarth, L, Grill, E. Psychological issues in reproductive disorders. In Chan, P, Goldstein, M, Rosenwaks, Z (eds.) Reproductive Medicine Secrets. Philadelphia PA: Hanley and Belfus Medical Publishers. 2004, 342–362.Google Scholar
Cooper, S, Glazer, E. Choosing Assisted Reproduction. Indianapolis: Perspectives Press. 1998.Google Scholar
Daniels, KR, Thorn, P. Sharing information with donor insemination offspring. A child-conception versus a family-building approach. Hum Reprod, 2001;16(9):1792–1796.Google Scholar
McGee, G, Brakman, SV, Gurmankin, AD. Gamete donation and anonymity: disclosure to children conceived with donor gametes should not be optional. Hum Reprod, 2001;16(10):2033–2036.Google Scholar
McWhinnie, A. Gamete donation and anonymity: should offspring from donated gametes continue to be denied knowledge of their origins and antecedents? Hum Reprod, 2001;16(5):807–817.Google Scholar
Broderick, P, Walker, I. Information access and donated gametes: how much do we know about who wants to know? Hum Reprod, 1995;10(12):3338–3341.Google Scholar
Klock, SC. The controversy surrounding privacy or disclosure among donor gamete recipients. J Assist Reprod Genet, 1997;14(7):378–380.Google Scholar
Shenfield, F, Steele, SJ. What are the effects of anonymity and secrecy on the welfare of the child in gamete donation? Hum Reprod, 1997;12(2):392–395.Google Scholar
Haimes, E. Theory and methodology in the analysis of the policy process: a case study of the Warnock committee on human fertilization and embryology. In Hill, M (ed.) New Agendas in the Study of the Policy Process. Hemel Hempstead: Wheatsheaf. 1993, 152–175.Google Scholar
Pennings, G. The “double track” policy for donor anonymity. Hum Reprod, 1997;12(12):2839–2844.Google Scholar
Greenfeld, DA. The impact of disclosure on donor gamete participants: donors, intended parents and offspring. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2008;20(3):265–268.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, WB, Lichtenberg, JW. Child abuse and the limits of confidentiality: forewarning practices. Behav Sci Law, 1993;11(2):181–192.Google Scholar
American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Psychological assessment of gamete donors and recipients. Fertil Steril, 2004;82(Suppl 1):S18–S19.Google Scholar
Hammarberg, K, Carmichael, M, Tinney, L, Mulder, A. Gamete donors’ and recipients’ evaluation of donor counselling: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2008;48(6):601–606.Google Scholar
Boggio, A. Italy enacts new law on medically assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod, 2005;20(5):1153–1157.Google Scholar
Boggio, A. The legalisation of gamete donation in Italy. Eur J Health Law, 2017;24(1):85–104.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, C, Lalos, O, Lindblad, F. Disclosure of donor insemination to the child: the impact of Swedish legislation on couples’ attitudes. Hum Reprod, 2000;15(9):2052–2056.Google Scholar
Cook, R, Golombok, S, Bish, A, Murray, C. Disclosure of donor insemination: parental attitudes. Am J Orthopsychiatry, 1995;65(4):549–559.Google Scholar
Lindblad, F, Gottlieb, C, Lalos, O. To tell or not to tell–what parents think about telling their children that they were born following donor insemination. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol, 2000;21(4):193–203.Google Scholar
Nachtigall, RD, Becker, G, Wozny, M. The effects of gender-specific diagnosis on men’s and women’s response to infertility. Fertil Steril, 1992;57(1):113–121.Google Scholar
Molock, S. Racial cultural and religious issues in infertility counseling. In Burns, L, Covinton, S (eds.) Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians. Pearl River, NY: Parthenon Publishing Group. 1999, 249–265.Google Scholar
McCormick, RA. Surrogacy: a catholic perspective. Creighton Law Rev, 1992;25(5):1617–1625.Google Scholar
Sallam, HN, Sallam, NH. Religious aspects of assisted reproduction. Facts Views Vis Obgyn, 2016;8(1):33–48.Google Scholar
Golombok, S, Lycett, E, MacCallum, F et al. Parenting infants conceived by gamete donation. J Fam Psychol, 2004;18(3):443–452.Google Scholar
Lycett, E, Daniels, K, Curson, R, Golombok, S. School-aged children of donor insemination: a study of parents’ disclosure patterns. Hum Reprod, 2005;20(3):810–819.Google Scholar
Shehab, D, Duff, J, Pasch, LA et al. How parents whose children have been conceived with donor gametes make their disclosure decision: contexts, influences, and couple dynamics. Fertil Steril, 2008;89(1):179–187.Google Scholar
Jadva, V, Freeman, T, Kramer, W, Golombok, S. The experiences of adolescents and adults conceived by sperm donation: comparisons by age of disclosure and family type. Hum Reprod, 2009;24(8):1909–1919.Google Scholar
Lycett, E, Daniels, K, Curson, R, Golombok, S. Offspring created as a result of donor insemination: a study of family relationships, child adjustment, and disclosure. Fertil Steril, 2004;82(1):172–179.Google Scholar
Golombok, S, Brewaeys, A, Giavazzi, MT et al. The European study of assisted reproduction families: the transition to adolescence. Hum Reprod, 2002;17(3):830–840.Google Scholar
Golombok, S, Readings, J, Blake, L et al. Children conceived by gamete donation: psychological adjustment and mother-child relationships at age 7. J Fam Psychol, 2011;25(2):230–239.Google Scholar
Fossa, SD, Aass, N, Molne, K. Is routine pre-treatment cryopreservation of semen worthwhile in the management of patients with testicular cancer? Br J Urol, 1989;64(5):524–529.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×