Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:54:21.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Degree Achievements of Color

from I - Syntax–Lexicon Interface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2019

Mónica Cabrera
Affiliation:
Loyola Marymount University, California
José Camacho
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

Degree achievement verbs (increase, fall, grow, age) present challenges for theories of argument structure based on aspectual characterizations (Abusch, 1986; Dowty, 1979, 1991; among others). These verbs show variable behavior with respect to telicity, and, furthermore, the (a)telic interpretation is not straightforwardly affected by properties of the verbs’ arguments, unlike the case of incremental theme verbs (eat an apple vs. eat apples) or directed motion verbs (descend vs. descend the stairs).

A subclass of degree achievement verbs is morphologically related to gradable adjectives (widen, cool, dry, lengthen) and they too exhibit the peculiar telicity properties of the wider class of degree achievements. It is now standardly believed that the aspectual properties of deadjectival degree achievements can be attributed to the scalar structure of the base adjective (Deo et al., 2013; Hay et al., 1999; Kennedy & Levin, 2008; Winter, 2006).

Type
Chapter
Information
Exploring Interfaces , pp. 85 - 108
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abusch, D. (1986). Verbs of change, causation and time. Technical report, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A. (2013). Deriving color adjectival nominalizations. Linguistica, 8, 143–58.Google Scholar
Amritavalli, R. & Jayaseelan, K. A. (2005). Finiteness and negation in Dravidian. In Cinque, G. & Kayne, R. S., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 178220.Google Scholar
Asher, R. E. & Kumari, T. C. (1997). Malayalam. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clapp, L. (2012). Indexical color-predicates: truth-conditional semantics vs. truth- conditional pragmatics. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 42(2), 71100.Google Scholar
Deo, A., Francez, I., & Koontz-Garboden, A. (2013). From change to value difference in degree achievements. In Snider, T., ed., Proceedings of the 23rd Semantics and Linguistics Theory Conference. Retrieved from https://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/SALT/issue/view/85.Google Scholar
Dowty, D. (1979). Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Dowty, D.(1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67(3), 547619.Google Scholar
Francez, I. & Koontz-Garboden, A. (2015). Semantic variation and the grammar of property concepts. Language, 91, 533–63.Google Scholar
Hansen, N. (2011). Color adjectives and radical contextualism. Linguistics and Philosophy, 34(3), 201–21.Google Scholar
Hansen, N. & Chemla, E. (2017). Color adjectives, standards, and thresholds: an experimental investigation. Linguistics and Philosophy, 40(3), 239–78.Google Scholar
Hay, J., Kennedy, C., & Levin, B. (1999). Scalar structure underlies telicity in “degree achievements.” In Matthews, T. & Strolovitch, D., eds., Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) IX. Retrieved from https://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/SALT/issue/view/100, pp. 127–44.Google Scholar
Kamp, H. (1975). Two theories of adjectives. In Keenan, E., ed., Formal Semantics of Natural Language. Cambridge University Press, pp. 123–55.Google Scholar
Kang, C. & Zubizarreta, M. L. (2017). Degree achievements in across-individuals. In Kaplan, A., McCarvel, M., and Rubin, E., eds., Proceedings of the 34th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp. 303–10.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. (2007). Vagueness and grammar: the semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30, 145.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. & Levin, B. (2008). Measure of change: the adjectival core of degree achievements. In McNally, L. & Kennedy, C., eds., Adjectives and Adverbs: Syntax, Semantics and Discourse. Oxford University Press, pp. 156–82.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. & McNally, L. (2005). Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language, 81(2), 345–8.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. & McNally, L.(2010). Color, Context and Compositionality. Synthese, 174(1), 7998.Google Scholar
Klein, E. (1980). A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, 145.Google Scholar
Koontz-Garboden, A. & Beavers, J. (2017). Change of state verbs and the semantics of roots. In Kaplan, A., McCarvel, M., and Rubin, E., eds., Proceedings of the 34th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp. 379–86.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, B. (2003). The Dravidian Languages. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, J. W. (2006). Time in a language without tense: the case of Chinese. Journal of Semantics, 23, 153.Google Scholar
Lin, J. W.(2010). A tenseless analysis of Mandarin Chinese revisited: a response to Sybesma 2007. Linguistic Inquiry, 41, 305–29.Google Scholar
McNally, L. (2011). Color terms: a case study in natural language ontology. Paper presented at the Workshop on the Syntax and Semantics of Nounhood and Adjectivehood, UAB/CSIC, Barcelona, 25 March.Google Scholar
McNally, L. & de Swart, H. (2011). Inflection and derivation: how adjectives and nouns refer to abstract objects. Pre-proceedings of the 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, 425–34.Google Scholar
Menon, M. (2013). The apparent lack of adjectival category in Malayalam and other related languages. In Goto, N., Otaki, K., Sato, A., & Takita, K., eds., Proceedings of Glow-in-Asia IX 2012: The Main Session. Mie University, Japan. Retrieved from http://faculty.human.mie-u.ac.jp/~glow_mie/IX_Proceedings_Oral/GLOWIXProceedings_Final.pdf, pp. 157–71.Google Scholar
Menon, M.(2016). Building adjectival meaning without adjectives (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California–Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Menon, M. & Pancheva, R. (2014). The grammatical life of property concept roots in Malayalam. In Etxeberria, U., Fălăuș, A., Irurtzun, A., & Leferman, B., eds., Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung. Retrieved from http://semanticsarchive.net/sub2013, pp. 289302.Google Scholar
Menon, M. & Pancheva, R.(2016). Decomposing color expressions in Malayalam. In Sundaresan, S. & Balusu, R., eds., Proceedings of FASAL V. Retrieved from https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/jsal/index.php/fasal/issue/view/14, pp. 320.Google Scholar
Mohanan, T. & Mohanan, K. P. (2009). Multiple tenses in the Malayalam verb. In Hanson, K. & Inkelas, S., eds., The Nature of the Word: Studies in Honor of Paul Kiparsky. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 359–85.Google Scholar
Moltmann, F. (2013). On the distinction between abstract states, concrete states, and tropes. In Mari, A., Beyssade, C., & Del Prete, F., eds., Genericity. Oxford University Press, pp. 292311.Google Scholar
Pillai, K. (1965). Malayalam Lexicon. Trivandrum: University of Kerala.Google Scholar
Sassoon, G. & Toledo, A. (2011). Absolute and relative adjectives and their comparison classes. Ms., Institute for Logic, Language, and Computation, University of Amsterdam and Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Toledo, A. & Sassoon, G. (2011). Absolute vs. relative adjectives – variance within vs. between individuals. In Ashton, N., Chereches, A., & Lutz, D., eds. Proceedings of SALT 21. Retrieved from https://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/SALT/issue/view/88, pp. 135–54.Google Scholar
Tonhauser, J. (2011). Temporal reference in Paraguayan Guaraní, a tenseless language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 34, 257303.Google Scholar
Winter, Y. (2006). Closure and telicity across categories. In Gibson, M. & Howell, J., eds., Semantics and Linguistic Theory 16. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, pp. 329–46.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L. & Oh, E. (2007). On the Syntactic Composition of Manner and Motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zwarts, J. (2005). Prepositional aspect and the algebra of paths. Linguistics and Philosophy, 28(6), 739–79.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×