Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 57
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
December 2009
Print publication year:
2006
Online ISBN:
9780511607516

Book description

Dynamic assessment embeds interaction within the framework of a test-intervene-retest approach to psychoeducational assessment. This book offers an introduction to diagnostic assessors in psychology, education, and speech/language pathology to the basic ideas, principles, and practices of dynamic assessment. Most importantly, the book presents an array of specific procedures developed and used by the authors that can be applied to clients of all ages in both clinical and educational settings. The authors discuss their approach to report-writing, with a number of examples to demonstrate how they incorporate dynamic assessment into a comprehensive approach to assessment. The text concludes with a discussion of issues and questions that need to be considered and addressed. Two appendixes include descriptions of additional tests used by the authors that are adapted for dynamic assessment, as well as information about dynamic assessment procedures developed by others and sources for additional information about this approach.

Reviews

"This is a dynamic application of dynamic assessment. This is a must-read for clinicians and educators, scholars and practitioners."
Kenneth Dodge, Duke University, Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology

"Haywood and Lidz, Dynamic Assessment in Practice: Clinical and Educational Applications, is one of the best published works on DA..... The authors present a comprehensive, eclectic, and transactional approach that deals with the complexities and richness of human beings' cognitive, behavioral, and social functioning.... A strong impression that emerges across the book is that the authors, with their long and rich experience in research and practice, are imbued with a mission to mediate the necessity, importance, and utility of using DA.... This book is a must-have for any psychologist or educator who is interested in basic understanding of human functioning and is not limited to those dealing with assessment alone." PsycCritiques

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

References
References
Abbott, S. P., Reed, E., Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (1997). Year-long balanced reading/writing tutorial: A design experiment used for dynamic assessment. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 249–263.
Albrecht, J. E., O'Brien, E. J., Mason, R. A., & Myers, J. L. (1995). The role of perspective in the accessibility of goals during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21(2), 364–372.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and the National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Anastasi, A. (1965). Individual differences. New York: Wiley.
Aranov, Z. (1999). Validity and reliability of the ACFS Behavior Observation Scale. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED438294; Clearinghouse Identifier: TM030602)
Ashman, A. F. (1992). Process-based instruction: Integrating assessment and instruction. In Haywood, H. C. & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 375–396). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Bain, B. A. (1994). A framework for dynamic assessment in phonology: Stimulability revisited. Clinical Communication Disorders, 4(1), 12–22.
Balzac, T., & Gaines, D. M. (n.d.). Dynamic multiple assessment: An instructional method that captures the symbiosis of assessment and instruction. Online download: Citeseer.ist.psu.edu/295525.html.
Barrera, M. (2003). Curriculum-based dynamic assessment for new- or second-language learners with learning disabilities in secondary education settings. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 29(1), 69–84.
Barsalou, L. W. (1992). Cognitive psychology: An overview for cognitive scientists. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Beavers, K. F., Kratochwill, T. R., & Braden, J. P. (2004). Treatment utility of functional versus empiric assessment within consultation for reading problems. School Psychology Quarterly, 19(1), 29–49.
Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.
Beck, A. T. (1991). Cognitive therapy: A 30-year retrospective. American Psychologist, 46, 369–375.
Bednar, M. R., & Kletzien, S. B. (1990). Dynamic assessment for reading: A validation. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL.
Bensoussan, Y. (2002). The effectiveness of mediation on three subtests of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale, a dynamic assessment procedure for young children. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 466635.
Bentley, A. M. (1980). Pattern reproduction in two cultures. International Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 1–9.
Berman, J. (2001). An application of dynamic assessment to school mathematical learning. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of New England, Armidale (Australia).
Berman, J., & Graham, L. (2002). School counsellor use of curriculum-based dynamic assessment. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 12(1), 21–40.
Berninger, V. (2004). Brain-based assessment and instructional intervention. In Reid, G. & Fawcett, A. (Eds.), Dyslexia in context. Research, policy, and practice (pp. 90–119). London and Philadelphia: Whur Publishers.
Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (1994). Redefining learning disabilities: Moving beyond aptitude-achievement discrepancies to failure to respond to validated treatment protocols. In Lyon, G. R. (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 162–182). Baltimore: P. H. Brooks.
Blachowicz, C. L. Z. (1999). Vocabulary in dynamic reading assessment: Two case studies. Reading Psychology, 20(3), 213–236.
Blaufarb, H. A. (1962). A demonstration of verbal abstracting ability in chronic schizophrenics under enriched stimulus and instructional conditions. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 26, 471–475.
Bleuler, M. (1950). Dementia praecox or the group of schizophrenias (Trans. H. Zenkin). New York: International Universities Press. (Original work published 1911)
Bleuler, M. (1978). The schizophrenic disorders: Long-term patient and family studies (Trans. S. M. Clemens). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. (Original work published 1972)
Blewitt, P. (1994). Understanding categorical hierarchies: The earliest levels of skill. Child Development, 65, 1279–1298.
Bloom, B. S., & Broder, L. J. (1950). Problem-solving processes of college students. School Review and Elementary School Journal, 73, 1–103.
Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (1996). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Boring, E. G. (1950). History of experimental psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Borkowski, J. G., Chan, L. K. S., & Muthukrishna, N. (2000). A process-oriented model of metacognition: Links between motivation and executive functioning. In Impara, J. C. & Murphy, L. L. (Managing Ed.), Buros-Nebraska series on measurement and testing: Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 1–41). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.
Borkowski, J. G., Turner, Lisa A., & Nicholson, J. (2004). Toward a research agenda on higher-level cognitive skills. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology [online], 4, 188–198. www.iacep.coged.org/journal (Retrieved August 12, 2005).
Bortner, M., & Birch, H. G. (1969). Cognitive capacity and cognitive competence. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 74, 735–744.
Bouchard, T. J. Jr., & McGue, M. (1981). Familial studies of intelligence: A review. Science, 212, 1055–1059.
Bransford, J. D., Delclos, V. R., Vye, N. J., Burns, M. S., & Hasselbring, T. S. (1986). Improving the quality of assessment and instruction: Roles of dynamic assessment (Technical Report No. 1, Alternative Assessments of Handicapped Children). Nashville, TN: Kennedy Center, Vanderbilt University.
Braun, C., Rennie, B. J., & Gordon, C. J. (1987). An examination of contexts for reading assessment. Journal of Educational Research, 89(5), 283–289.
Bronson, M. B. (2000). Self-regulation in early childhood: Nature and nurture. New York: Guilford Press.
Brooks, N. D. (1997). An exploratory study into the cognitive modifiability of pre-school children using dynamic assessment. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Newcastle-Upon-Tyne; Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1986). Psychological theory and the study of learning disabilities. American Psychologist, 14(10), 1059–1068.
Brozo, W. G. (1990). Learning how at-risk readers learn best: A case for interactive assessment. Journal of Reading, 33(7), 522–527.
Budoff, M. (1967). Learning potential among institutionalized young adult retardates. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 72, 404–411.
Budoff, M. (1971). Learning potential and institutional discharge rates among adult EMRs. RIEPrint #33. Cambridge, MA: Research Institute for Educational Problems.
Budoff, M. (1987). The validity of learning potential assessment. In Lidz, C. S. (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 52–81). New York: Guilford Press.
Budoff, M., & Friedman, M. (1964). “Learning potential” as an assessment approach to the adolescent mentally retarded. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28, 434–439.
Burns, M. S. (1980). Preschool children's approach and performance on cognitive tasks. Unpublished master's thesis, George Peabody College of Vanderbilt University.
Burns, M. S. (1985). Comparison of “graduated prompt” and “mediational” dynamic assessment and static assessment with young children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Burns, M. S., Haywood, H. C., & Delclos, V. R. (1987). Young children's problem- solving strategies: An observational study. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 8, 113.
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281.
Butler, K. G. (1997). Dynamic assessment at the millennium: A transient tutorial for today! Journal of Children's Communication Development, 19(1), 43–54.
Call, R. J. (1973). Verbal abstracting performance of low-SES children: An exploration of Jensen's theory of mental retardation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Peabody College.
Campbell, R., Donaldson, M., & Young, B. (1976). Constraints on classificatory skills in young children. British Journal of Psychology, 67(1), 80–100.
Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1985). Dynamic assessment: One approach and some initial data (Technical Report No. 361). Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED269735)
Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In Lidz, C. S. (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 82–140). New York: Guilford Press.
Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1990). Guided learning and transfer: Implications for approaches to assessment. In Frederiksen, N., Glaser, R., Lesgold, A., & Shafto, M. G. (Eds.), Diagnostic monitoring of skill and knowledge acquisition (pp. 141–172). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L., & Ferrara, R. A. (1982). Mental retardation and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 392–490). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Carlson, J. (1995, July). Models of intelligence: Implications for cognitive education. Presidential address, Fifth International Congress, International Association for Cognitive Education; Monticello, New York. Unpublished manuscript; Seattle, WA: University of Washington, College of Education.
Carlson, J. S., & Das, J. P. (1997). A process approach to remediating word decoding deficiencies in Chapter 1 children. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 20(2), 93–102.
Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1980). Applications of a dynamic testing approach in intelligence assessment: Empirical results and theoretical formulations. Zeitschrift für Differentiele und Diagnostische Psychologie, 1, 303–318.
Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1992a). Principles of dynamic assessment: The application of a specific model. Learning and Individual Differences, 4(2), 153–166.
Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1992b). The dynamic assessment of intelligence. In Haywood, H. C. & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 167–186). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Carney, J. J., & Cioffi, G. (1990). Extending traditional diagnosis: The dynamic assessment of reading abilities. Reading Psychology, 11(3), 177–192.
Carney, J. J., & Cioffi, G. (1992). The dynamic assessment of reading abilities. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 39(2), 107–114.
Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction. In Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. S., & Miller, S. M. (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39–63). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Chan, W. Y., Ashman, A. F., & Van Kraayenoord, C. E. (2000). Science and biological classification: Linking dynamic assessment to classroom curriculum. In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 607–639). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Cherkes-Julkowski, M., & Gertner, N. (1989). Spontaneous cognitive processes in handicapped children. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Churches, M., Skuy, M., & Das, J. P. (2002). Identification and remediation of reading difficulties based on successive processing deficits and delays in general reading. Psychological Reports, 91 (3, Pt1), 813–824.
Cioffi, G., & Carney, J. J. (1983). The dynamic assessment of reading disabilities. Reading Teacher, 36, 764–768.
Cohen, D. (2002). How the child's mind develops. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Cooper, L. A., & Regan, D. T. (1982). Attention, perception, and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 123–169). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Copple, C., Sigel, I. E., & Saunders, R. (1984). Educating the young thinker: Classroom strategies for cognitive growth. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Craig, H. K., & Evans, J. L. (1993). Pragmatics with SLI: Within-group variations in discourse behaviors. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 36, 777–789.
Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, L. (1970). How we should measure change – or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68–80.
Das, J. P., Kar, B. C., & Parrila, R. K. (1996). Cognitive planning: The psychological basis of intelligent behavior. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Das, J. P., Mishra, R. K., & Pool, J. E. (1995). An experiment on cognitive remediation of word-reading difficulty. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 66–79.
Das, J. P., & Naglieri, J. A. (1997). Das/Naglieri: Cognitive Assessment System. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
Das, J. P., Naglieri, J. A., & Kirby, J. R. (1994). Assessment of cognitive processes: The PASS theory of intelligence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Delclos, V. R., Burns, M. S., & Vye, N. J. (1993). A comparison of teachers' responses to dynamic and traditional assessment reports. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 11(1), 46–55.
Delclos, V. R., Vye, N. J., Burns, M. S., Bransford, J. D., & Hasslebring, T. S. (1992). In Haywood, H. C. & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 317–331). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Delclos, V. R., Vye, N. J., Johnson, R. T., & Bransford, J. D. (1987). Effects of dynamic assessment feedback on teacher instruction (Technical Report No. 12, Alternative Assessments of Handicapped Children). Nashville, TN: Kennedy Center, Vanderbilt University.
DeLoache, J. S. (1991). Symbolic functioning in very young children: Understanding of pictures and models. Child Development, 62, 736–752.
DeLoache, J. S. (1995). Early understanding and use of symbols: The Model model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 109–113.
Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., Buysse, A., & De Clercq, A. (2002). Dynamic assessment of metacognitive skills in young children with mathematics learning disabilities. In Aaslsvoort, G. M., Resing, W. C. M., & Ruijssenaars, A. J. J. M. (Eds.), Learning potential assessment and cognitive training: Actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology (pp. 307–333). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Deutsch, R. (2003). Mediation from the perspective of mediated learning experience. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 3, 29–45. Retrieved from www.iacep.coged.org/journal October 14, 2004.
Dodge, D. T., & Colker, L. J. (1992). The creative curriculum for early childhood (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Teaching Strategies.
Drahozal, E. (1997). Validity Information for the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS) and Iowa Tests of Educational Development (ITED). Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing Co.
Ehrlenmeyer-Kimling, L., & Jarvik, L. F. (1963). Genetics and intelligence: A review. Science, 142, 1477–1479.
Eisenberg, N., & Harris, J. D. (1984). Social competence: A developmental perspective. School Psychology Review, 13(3), 267–277.
Elder, J. H., & Goodman, J. J. (1996). Social turn-taking of children with neuropsychiatric impairments and their parents. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 19(4), 249–262.
Elliott, J. (1993). Assisted assessment: If it is “dynamic” why is it so rarely employed? Educational and Child Psychology, 10(4), 48–58.
Elliott, J. G. (2000). Dynamic assessment in educational contexts: Purpose and promise. In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 713–740). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Elliott, J. (2003). Dynamic assessment in educational settings: Realising potential. Educational Review, 55(1), 15–32.
Elrod, G. F., & Tesolowski, D. G. (1993). Best practices in the vocational assessment of special needs learners. In Vance, H. B. (Ed.), Best practices in assessment for school and clinical settings (pp. 69–111). Brandon, VT: Clinical Psychology Publishing.
Embretson, S. E. (1987). Toward development of a psychometric approach. In Lidz, C. S. (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 141–170). New York: Guilford Press.
Estes, W. K. (1982). Learning, memory, and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 170–224). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Feather, N. T. (1961). The relationship of persistence at a task to expectation of success and achievement related motives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3), 552–561.
Fenichel, O. (1946). The psychoanalytic theory of neurosis. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.
Fenwick, T. J., & Parsons, J. (1999). Using dynamic assessment in the social studies classroom. Canadian Social Studies, 34(1), 153–155.
Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R. S., Falik, L., & Rand, Y. (2002). The dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability. Jerusalem: ICELP Press.
Feuerstein, R., Haywood, H. C., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. B., & Jensen, M. (1982/1986). Examiner manual for the Learning Potential Assessment Device. Jerusalem: Hadassah-WIZO-Canada Research Institute and International Center for the Enhancement of Learning Potential.
Feuerstein, R., Jeannet, M., & Richelle, M. (1953). Quelques observations du développement intellectuel chez les jeunes juifs nord-africains [Some observations on intellectual development in North African Jewish youth]. Unpublished manuscript, Jerusalem: Hadassah-WIZO-Canada Research Institute and International Centre for the Enhancement of Learning Potential.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. B. (1979). Dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The Learning Potential Assessment Device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. B., & Miller, R. (1980). Instrumental enrichment. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Feuerstein, R. F., & Richelle, M. (1954). Enfants juifs nord-africains [North African Jewish children]. Tel Aviv: The Jewish Agency.
Flavell, J. H. (1985). Cognitive development (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H., & Miller, S. A. (1993). Cognitive development (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Frye, D., Zelazo, P. D., & Palfai, T. (1995). Theory of mind and rule-based reasoning. Cognitive Development, 10, 483–527.
Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986a). Effects of systematic formative evaluation on student achievement: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53, 199–208.
Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986b). Curriculum-based assessment of progress toward long-term and short-term goals. Journal of Special Education, 20, 69–81.
Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1994). Must instructionally useful performance assessment be based in the curriculum? Exceptional Children, 61, 15–24.
Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1996). Combining performance assessment and curriculum-based measurement to strengthen instructional planning. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 11, 183–192.
Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Curriculum-based measurement: Describing competence, enhancing outcomes, evaluating treatment effects, and identifying treatment nonresponders. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(2), 64–84.
Fuchs, L., Fuchs D., Eaton, S., & Hamlett, C. (2003). Dynamic assessment of test accommodations. Austin, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 157–171.
Gelman, S. A. (1998). Categories in young children's thinking. Young Children, 53(1), 20–26.
Gelman, S. A., & Coley, J. D. (1990). The importance of knowing a Dodo is a bird: Categories and inferences in 2-year-old children. Developmental Psychology, 26(5), 796–804.
Gerard, C. (1975, September–December). Developmental study of categorical classifications. Enfance, nos. 3–4, 345–372.
Gerber, M. M. (2000). Dynamic assessment for students with learning disabilities: Lessons in theory and design. In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 263–292). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Gerber, M., Semmel, D., & Semmel, M. (1994). Computer-based dynamic assessment of multidigit multiplication. Exceptional Children, 61(2), 114–125.
Gettinger, M. (1984). Measuring time needed for learning to predict learning outcomes. Exceptional Children, 51(3), 244–248.
Gilliam, J. E., Carpenter, B. O., & Christensen, J. R. (1996). Gifted and Talented Evaluation Scales: Examiner's manual. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.
Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
Goncu, A., & Rogoff, B. (1998). Children's categorization with varying adult support. American Research Journal, 35(2), 333–349.
Gordon, J. E., & Haywood, H. C. (1969). Input deficit in cultural-familial retardates: Effect of stimulus enrichment. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 73, 604–610.
Goswami, U. (1998). Cognition in children. East Sussex, England: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.
Greenberg, K. H. (2000a). Inside professional practice: A collaborative, systems orientation to linking dynamic assessment and intervention. In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 489–312). Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.
Greenberg, K. H. (2000b). Attending to hidden needs: The cognitive enrichment advantage perspective. Educational and Child Psychology: Psychological Influences upon Educational Intervention, 17(3), 51–69.
Greenberg, K. H., & Williams, L. (2002). Reciprocity and mutuality in dynamic assessment: Asking uncomfortable questions. In Aaslsvoort, G. M., Resing, W. C. M., & Ruijssenaars, A. J. J. M. (Eds.), Learning potential assessment and cognitive training: Actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology (pp. 91–110). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Greenspan, S. I., Nover, R. A., & Scheuer, A. Q. (1987). A developmental diagnostic approach for infants, young children, and their families. Clinical Infant Reports, no. 3, 499–535.
Guterman, E. (2002). Toward dynamic assessment of reading: Applying metacognitive awareness guidance to reading assessment tasks. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(3), 283–298.
Guthke, J. (1982). The learning test concept: An alternative to the traditional static intelligence test. German Journal of Psychology, 6(4), 306–324.
Guthke, J. (1985). Ein neuer Ansatz für die rehabilitations-psychologisch orientierte Psychodiagnostik: das Lerntestkonzept als Alternative zum herkommlichen Intelligenztest [A new approach to rehabilitation-oriented psychodiagnosis: The learning test concept as an alternative to the traditional intelligence test.] In Wiedl, K. H. (Ed.), Rehabilitations-psychologie [Rehabilitation psychology]. Mainz, Germany: Kohlhammer.
Guthke, J. (1992). Learning tests: The concept, main research findings, problems, and trends. In Carlson, J. S. (Ed.), Advances in cognition and educational practice (Vol. 1A, pp. 213–233). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Guthke, J., & Loffler, M. (1983). A diagnostic program (learning test) for the differential assessment of school failure in 1st grade pupils. In Rosler, H. D., Das, J. P., & Wald, I. (Eds.), Mental and language retardation (pp. 41–50). Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
Guthke, J., & Wingenfeld, S. (1992). The learning test concept: Origins, state of the art, and trends. In Haywood, H. C. & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 64–93). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Guthrie, E. R. (1952). The psychology of learning (rev. ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
Gutierrez-Clellen, V. F., & Peña, E. (2001). Dynamic assessment of diverse children: A tutorial. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32(4), 212–224.
Haeussermann, E. (1958). Developmental potential of preschool children. New York: Grune & Stratton.
Halpin, V. G. (1958). The performance of mentally retarded children on the Weigl Goldstein-Scheerer Color Form Sorting Test. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 62(5), 916–919.
Halstead, W. C. (1947). Brain and intelligence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hamers, J., Pennings, A., & Guthke, J. (1994). Training-based assessment of school achievement. Learning and Instruction, 4, 347–360.
Hamers, J. H. M., Sijtsma, K., & Ruijssenaars, A. J. J. M. (Eds.). (1993). Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological, and practical issues. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Hamlin, R. M., Haywood, H. C., & Folsom, A. T. (1965). Effect of enriched input on schizophrenic abstraction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 70, 390–394.
Hansen, A. (2003). On mediation from Magne Nyborg's perspective. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 3, 54–70. Retrieved from www.iacep.coged.org/journal October 14, 2004.
Harlow, H. F. (1949). The formation of learning sets. Psychological Review, 56, 51–65.
Harvard Graduate School of Education, Educational Technology Center. (1995). Assessing mathematical understanding and skills effectively: An interim report of the Harvard Group Balanced Assessment in Mathematics Project. Cambridge, MA: Educational Technology Center.
Hays, D. R. III (2001). Use of information from dynamic assessment of vocational aptitudes of persons with mental retardation by vocational rehabilitation counselors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation proposal, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Haywood, H. C. (1967). Experiential factors in intellectual development: The concept of dynamic intelligence. In Zubin, J. & Jervis, G. A. (Eds.), Psychopathology of mental development (pp. 69–104). New York: Grune & Stratton.
Haywood, H. C. (1968a). Introduction to clinical neuropsychology. In Haywood, H. C. (Ed.), Brain damage in school age children (pp. 3–19). Washington, DC: Council for Exceptional Children.
Haywood, H. C. (1968b). Motivational orientation of overachieving and underachieving elementary school children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 72, 662–667.
Haywood, H. C. (1971). Individual differences in motivational orientation: A trait approach. In Day, H. I., Berlyne, D. E., & Hunt, D. E. (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation: A new direction in education (pp. 113–127). Toronto: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Haywood, H. C. (1977). Alternatives to normative assessment. In Mittler, P. (Ed.), Research to practice in mental retardation: Proceedings of the 4th Congress of IASSMD. Vol. 2, Education and training (pp. 11–18). Baltimore: University Park Press.
Haywood, H. C. (1986). Test of Verbal Abstracting. In Feuerstein, R., Haywood, H. C., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. B., & Jensen, M., Examiner manual, Learning Potential Assessment Device. Jerusalem: Hadassah-WIZO-Canada Research Institute.
Haywood, H. C. (1987/1993). A mediational teaching style. The Thinking Teacher, 4(1), 1–6. Also published in International Journal of Cognitive Education and Mediated Learning, 3(1), 27–38.
Haywood, H. C. (1988). Bridging: A special technique of mediation. The Thinking Teacher, 4(2), 4–5.
Haywood, H. C. (1992a). The strange and wonderful symbiosis of motivation and cognition. International Journal of Cognitive Education and Mediated Learning, 2(3), 186–197.
Haywood, H. C. (1992b). Interactive assessment: A special issue. Journal of Special Education, 26, 233–234.
Haywood, H. C. (1997). Interactive assessment. In Taylor, R. L. (Ed.), Assessment of individuals with mental retardation (pp. 103–129). San Diego, CA: Singular.
Haywood, H. C. (2000). Cognitive developmental psychotherapy: Overview. In Kozulin, A., Rand, Y., & Feuerstein, R. (Eds.), Experience of mediated learning: An impact of Feuerstein's theory in education and psychology (pp. 292–308). London: Pergamon.
Haywood, H. C. (2002, December). New concepts of intelligence are needed: New methods of assessment will be required. Paper given at the Vanderbilt Conference on the Futures of Assessment, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Haywood, H. C. (2003a). Mediation within a neo-Piagetian framework. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 3, 71–81. Retrieved from www.iacep.coged.org/journal October 14, 2004.
Haywood, H. C. (2003b, November). A transactional perspective on intellectual disability. Keynote address, Australian Society for the Study of Intellectual Disability, Brisbane.
Haywood, H. C. (2004a). Thinking in, around, and about the curriculum: The role of cognitive education. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 51, 231–252.
Haywood, H. C. (2004b). Theoretical bases of cognitive education: Old and new perspectives. Cognitive Education in South Africa, 11(2), 3–8. (Video presentation, International Association for Cognitive Education and Psychology-Southern Africa. Cape Town, South Africa, November 2004). DVD available from author.
Haywood, H. C. (2005, July). Group dynamic assessment with adults with traumatic brain injuries: Massed versus distributed mediation. Paper given at the 10th international conference, International Association for Cognitive Education and Psychology, Durham, UK.
Haywood, H. C. (2006). A transactional perspective on mental retardation. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 31, 289–314.
Haywood, H. C., & Bransford, J. D. (1984, April). Dynamic versus static assessment of young handicapped children. Presented at Annual Conference on Psychological Theory and Research in Mental Retardation, Gatlinburg, TN.
Haywood, H. C., Brooks, P. H., & Burns, M. S. (1992). Bright start: Cognitive curriculum for young children. Watertown, MA: Charlesbridge.
Haywood, H. C., & Burke, W. P. (1977). Development of individual differences in intrinsic motivation. In Uzgiris, I. C. & Weizman, F. (Eds.), The structuring of experience (pp. 235–263). New York: Plenum.
Haywood, H. C., Filler, J. W., Jr., Shifman, M. A., & Chatelanat, G. (1975). Behavioral assessment in mental retardation. In McReynolds, P. (Ed.), Advances in psychological assessment (Vol. 3, pp. 96–136). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. S. (2005). International survey of dynamic assessment trainers. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 5(2), 181–198. Retrieved from www.iacep.coged.orgJanuary 5, 2006.
Haywood, H. C., & Menal, C. (1992). Cognitive developmental psychotherapy: A case study. International Journal of Cognitive Education and Mediated Learning, 2(1), 43–54 [Version française, pp. 55–66].
Haywood, H. C., & Miller, M. B. (2003). Group dynamic assessment of adults with traumatic brain injuries. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 3, 37–163. Retrieved from www.iacep.coged.org/journal, November 25, 2003.
Haywood, H. C., & Miller, M. B. (2005, July). Group dynamic assessment with adults with traumatic brain injuries: Massed versus distributed mediation. Paper given at the 10th international conference, International Association for Cognitive Education and Psychology, Durham, UK.
Haywood, H. C., & Moelis, I. (1963). Effect of symptom change on intellectual function in schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 76–78.
Haywood, H. C., & Paour, J.-L. (1992). Alfred Binet (1857–1911): Multifaceted pioneer. Psychology, Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 18(1), 1–4.
Haywood, H. C., & Switzky, H. N. (1974). Children's verbal abstracting: Effects of enriched input, age, and IQ. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 78, 556.
Haywood, H. C., & Switzky, H. N. (1986). Intrinsic motivation and behavior effectiveness in retarded persons. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 14, 1–46.
Haywood, H. C., & Switzky, H. N. (1992). Ability and modifiability: What, how, and how much? In Carlson, J. S. (Ed.), Cognition and educational practice: An international perspective (pp. 25–85). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Haywood, H. C., & Tapp, J. T. (1966). Experience and the development of adaptive behavior. In Ellis, N. R. (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 1, pp. 109–151). New York: Academic Press.
Haywood, H. C., & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.). (1992). Interactive assessment. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Haywood, H. C., & Tzuriel, D. (2002). Applications and challenges in dynamic assessment. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(2), 40–63.
Haywood, H. C., Tzuriel, D., & Vaught, S. (1992). Psychoeducational assessment from a transactional perspective. In Haywood, H. C. & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 38–63). New York: Springer.
Haywood, H. C., & Wachs, T. D. (1966). Size-discrimination learning as a function of motivation-hygiene orientation in adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 279–286.
Haywood, H. C., & Wachs, T. D. (1981). Intelligence, cognition, and individual differences. In Begab, M. J., Haywood, H. C., & Garber, H. (Eds.), Psychosocial influences in retarded performance. Vol. 1, Issues and theories in development (pp. 95–126). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Haywood, H. C., & Weaver, S. J. (1967). Differential effects of motivational orientation and incentive conditions on motor performance in institutionalized retardates. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 72, 459–467.
Heald, J. D., & Marzolf, S. S. (1953). Abstract behavior in elementary school children as measured by the Goldstein-Scheerer Stick Test and the Weigl-Goldstein-Scheerer Color Form Sorting Test. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 59–62.
Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.
Heimburger, R. F., & Reitan, R. M. (1961). Easily administered written test for lateralizing brain lesions. Journal of Neurosurgery, 18, 301–312.
Heinrich, J. J. (1991). Responsiveness of adults with severe head injury to mediated learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Hessels, M. G. P. (2000). The Learning Potential Test for Ethnic Minorities (LEM): A tool for standardized assessment of children in kindergarten and the first years of primary school. In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 109–131). Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.
Hickling, A. K., & Wellman, H. M. (2000). The emergence of children's causal explanations and theories: Evidence from everyday conversation. Developmental Psychology, 37(5), 668–683.
Hirsch, E. D. Jr., & Holdren, J. (Eds.). (1996). What your kindergartner needs to know. Charlottesville, VA: Core Knowledge Foundation.
Hoover, H. D., Hieronymus, A. N., Frisbie, D. A., & Dunbar, S. B. (1993). Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS) and Iowa Tests of Educational Development (ITED). Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
Hudson, J., & Fivush, R. (1991, April). Planning in the preschool years. The emergence of plans from general event knowledge. Paper presented in G. Sansone & C. Berg (Chairs). New directions in the development of planning: Cognitive, social and motivational components. Symposium presented at the meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle.
Hunt, J. McV. (1961). Intelligence and experience. New York: Ronald.
Hunt, J. McV. (1963). Motivation inherent in information processing and action. In Harvey, O. J. (Ed.), Motivation and social interaction (pp. 35–94). New York: Ronald.
Hunt, J. McV., & Cofer, C. N. (1944). Psychological deficit. In Hunt, J. McV (Ed.), Personality and the behavior disorders (pp. 971–1032). New York: Ronald Press.
Hupp, S. C., & Abbeduto, L. (1991). Persistence as an indicator of mastery motivation in young children with cognitive delays. Journal of Early Intervention, 15(3), 219–225.
Jacobs, E. L. (2001). The effects of adding dynamic assessment components to a computerized preschool language screening test. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 22(4), 217–226.
Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.
Jensen, A. R. (1991). General mental ability: From psychometrics to biology. Diagnostique, 16, 134–144.
Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Jensen, A. R. (2000). Psychometric skepticism. Psycoloquy, 11, #39. Retrieved from psycprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/archive/00000039 January 19, 2005.
Jensen, E. (1998). Teaching with the brain in mind. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Jepsen, R. H., & Lidz, C. S. (2000). Group dynamic assessment procedure: Reliability and validity of a cognitive assessment procedure with adolescents with developmental disabilities. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 1(1). Online journal of the International Association of Cognitive Education and Psychology, www.iacep.coged.org.
Jitendra, A. K., & Kameenui, E. J. (1993). An exploratory study of dynamic assessment involving two instructional strategies on experts and novices' performance in solving part-whole mathematical word problems. Diagnostique, 18, 305–324.
Jitendra, A. K., & Kameenui, E. J. (1996). Experts and novices' error patterns in solving part-whole mathematical word problems: The role of dynamic assessment and instructional strategies. Unpublished manuscript, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.
Jitendra, A. K., & Rohena-Diaz, E. (1996). Language assessment of students who are linguistically diverse: Why a discrete approach is not the answer. School Psychology Review, 25, 40–56.
Jitendra, A. K., Rohena-Diaz, E., & Nolet, V. (1998). A dynamic curriculum-based language assessment: Planning instruction for special needs students who are linguistically diverse. Preventing School Failure, 42(4), 182–185.
Johnson, K., Haywood, H. C., & Hays, D. R. (1992, February). Effects of failure within the test on subsequent subtest performance. Paper presented at the Third International Conference of the International Association for Cognitive Education, Riverside, CA.
Kahn, R. (2000). Dynamic assessment of infants and toddlers. In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 229–262). Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.
Kaniel, S., & Tzuriel, D. (1992). Mediated learning experience approach in the assessment and treatment of borderline psychotic adolescents. In Haywood, H. C. & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 399–418). New York: Springer.
Karnes, M. B., Johnson, L. J., & Beauchamp, K. D. F. (1989). Developing problem-solving skills to enhance task persistence of handicapped preschool children. Journal of Early Intervention, 13(1), 61–72.
Karpov, Y. V. (1982). Kriterii I metody diagnostiki umstvennogo razvitiya [Criteria and methods for the assessment of mental development]. Vestn.MGU: Psikhologia, 3, 18–26.
Karpov, Y. V. (2003a). Vygotsky's doctrine of scientific concepts. In Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. S., & Miller, S. M. (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 65–82). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Karpov, Y. (2003b). Vygotsky's concept of mediation. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 3, 46–53. Retrieved from www.iacep.coged.org/journal, December 4, 2003.
Karpov, Y. (2005). The neo-Vygotskian approach to child development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Karpov, Y., & Haywood, H. C. (1998). Two ways to elaborate Vygotsky's concept of mediation: Implications for education. American Psychologist, 53(1), 27–36.
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1983). K-ABC: Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Keane, K. J., Tannenbaum, A. J., & Krapf, G. F. (1992). Cognitive competence: Reality and potential in the deaf. In Haywood, H. C. & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 300–316). New York: Springer.
Klahr, D., & Robinson, M. (1981). Formal assessment of problem-solving and planning processes in preschool children. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 113–148.
Kletzien, S. B., & Bednar, M. R. (1990). Dynamic assessment for at-risk readers. Journal of Reading, 33(7), 528–533.
Kopp, C. B. (1992). Emotional distress and control in young children. In Eisenberg, N. & Fabes, R. A. (Eds.), Emotion and its regulation in early development (pp. 41–56). New Directions for Child Development, no. 55. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Korstvedt, A., Stacey, C. L., & Reynolds, W. F. (1954). Concept formation of normal and subnormal adolescents on a modification of the Weigl-Goldstein-Scheerer Color Form Sorting Test. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 10(1), 88–90.
Kovaleski, J. (2004). Response to instruction in the identification of learning disabilities: A guide for school teams. NASP Communiqué, 32, No. 5.
Kozulin, S., & Garb, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension. School Psychology International, 23(1), 112–127.
Kraepelin, E. (1919). Dementia praecox. New York: Churchill Livingstone, Inc. (Trans. E. Barclay & S. Barclay, published 1971).
Kragler, A. (1989). Dynamic versus static assessment; A comparison of the effects of each on the reading placement levels of Chapter 1 students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED327898)
Kroesbergen, E. H., VanLuit, J. E. H., & Naglieri, J. A. (2003). Mathematical learning difficulties and PASS cognitive processes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(6), 574–582.
L'Abate, L. (1968). Screening children with cerebral dysfunction through the laboratory method. In Haywood, H. C. (Ed.), Brain damage in school age children (pp. 128–158). Washington, DC: Council for Exceptional Children.
Lahey, M. (1988). Language disorders and language development. New York: Macmillan.
Laing, S. P., & Kamhi, A. (2003). Alternative assessment of language and literacy in culturally and linguistically diverse populations. Language, Speech, & Hearing Services in Schools, 34(1), 44–55.
Largotta, D. (2001). Comparison of four year old children's retelling of stories in three conditions of increasing abstractness. Unpublished master's thesis, Touro College, New York, NY.
Lee, M., Vaughn, B. E., & Kopp, C. B. (1983). Role of self-control in the performance of very young children on a delayed-response memory-for-location task. Developmental Psychology, 19(1), 40–44.
Levy, C. (1999). The discriminant validity of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale (ACFS): A performance comparison between typically developing and special needs preschool children. Unpublished master's thesis, Touro College, New York, NY.
Lidz, C. S. (Ed.). (1987). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach for evaluating learning potential. New York: Guilford Press.
Lidz, C. S. (1991). Practitioner's guide to dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford Press.
Lidz, C. S. (1992). Extent of incorporation of dynamic assessment in cognitive assessment courses: A national survey of school psychology trainers. Journal of Special Education, 26, 325–331.
Lidz, C. S. (2000). The Application of Cognitive Functions Scale (ACFS): An example of curriculum-based dynamic assessment. In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 407–439). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Lidz, C. S. (2001). Multicultural issues and dynamic assessment. In Suzuki, L. A., Ponterotto, J. G., & Meller, P. J. (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural assessment: Clinical, psychological, and educational applications (2nd ed., pp. 523–539). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lidz, C. S. (2003). Early childhood assessment. New York: Wiley.
Lidz, C. S. (2004). Successful application of a dynamic assessment procedure with deaf students between the ages of four and eight years. Educational and Child Psychology, 21(1), 59–73.
Lidz, C. S., & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.). (2000). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications. Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.
Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lidz, C. S., & Greenberg, K. H. (1997). Criterion validity of a group dynamic assessment procedure with rural first grade regular education students. Journal of Cognitive Education, 6(2), 89–99.
Lidz, C. S., Jepsen, R. H., & Miller, M. B. (1997). Relationships between cognitive processes and academic achievement: Application of a group dynamic assessment procedure with multiply handicapped students. Educational and Child Psychology, 14(4), 56–67.
Lidz, C. S., & Macrine, S. L. (2001). An alternative approach to the identification of gifted culturally and linguistically diverse learners. School Psychology International, 22(1), 74–96.
Lidz, C. S., & Aalsvoort, G. M. (2005). Usefulness of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale with young children from The Netherlands. Transylvanian Journal of Psychology [special issue on dynamic assessment; Guest Ed., J. Lebeer] 1, 82–99.
Lillard, A., & Curenton, S. (1999). Do young children understand what others feel, want, and know? Young Children, 54(5), 52–57.
Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lipman, M., Sharp, A. M., & Oscanyan, F. S. (1980). Philosophy in the classroom. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Lubinski, D., & Dawis, R. W. (1992). Aptitudes, skills, and proficiencies. In Dunnette, M. D. & Hough, L. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 1–59). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Luria, A. R. (1966). Human brain and psychological processes (Trans. B. Haigh). New York: Harper & Row.
Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology (Trans B. Haigh). New York: Basic Books.
Luria, A. R. (1979). The making of mind: A personal account of Soviet psychology (Eds. Michael Cole & Sheila Cole). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Luria, A. R. (1980). Higher cortical functions in man (2nd ed., Trans. B. Haigh). New York: Basic Books.
Lyon, G. R., Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Torgesen, J. K., Wood, F. B.. (2001). Rethinking learning disabilities. Washington, DC: Thomas Fordham Foundation. Retrieved January 19, 2005 from www.edexcellence.net/library/special_ed/index.html
Machleit, S. R. (2000). Working memory and writing: A comparison of two types of dynamic assessment of working memory and the relationship to sorting ability of heterogeneously grouped seventh grade students. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 61(2-A), 496.
Malowitsky, M. (2001). Investigation of the effectiveness of the mediation portion of two subscales of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale, a dynamic assessment procedure for young children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 457191; Clearinghouse identifier: TM033288)
Marzano, R. J., Brandt, R. S., Hughes, C. S., Jones, B. F., Presseisen, B. Z., Rankin, S. C., & Suhor, C. (1988). Dimensions of thinking: A framework for curriculum and instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Mason, J. M. (Ed.). (1989). Reading and writing connections. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
McFarlin, D. B. (1985). Persistence in the face of failure: The impact of self-esteem and contingency of information. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(2), 153–163.
Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive–behavior modification: An integrative approach. New York: Plenum.
Meichenbaum, D. (1982). Teaching thinking: A cognitive–behavioral approach. Austin, TX: Society for Learning Disabilities and Remedial Education.
Meltzer, L. J. (1987). The Surveys of Problem-Solving and Educational Skills (SPES). Cambridge, MA: Educator's Publishing Service.
Meltzer, L. J. (1992). Strategy use in students with learning disabilities: The challenge of assessment. In Melzter, L. (Ed.), Strategy assessment and instruction of students with learning disabilities: From theory to practice (pp. 93–135). San Antonio, TX: Pro-Ed.
Meltzer, L., & Reid, D. K. (1994). New directions in the assessment of students with special needs: The shift toward a constructivist perspective. Journal of Special Education, 28(3), 335–355.
Messick, S. J. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749.
Miller, G. (1999). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. In Sternberg, R. J. & Wagner, R. K. (Eds.), Readings in cognitive psychology (pp. 2–18). Ft. Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College.
Minick, N. (1987). Implications of Vygotsky's theories for dynamic assessment. In Lidz, C. S. (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 116–140). New York: Guilford Press.
Minnaert, A. (2002). Alternative assessment of students' domain-specific learning competencies in the transition of secondary to higher education. In Aaslsvoort, G. M., Resing, W. C. M., & Ruijssenaars, A. J. J. M. (Eds.), Learning potential assessment and cognitive training: Actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology (pp. 335–351). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Naglieri, J. A. (1997). Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test: Multilevel technical manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Naglieri, J. A., & Gottling, S. H. (1997). The PASS theory and mathematics instruction: A summary of initial studies. Journal of Cognitive Education, 5, 209–215.
Naglieri, J. A., & Johnson, D. (2000). Effectiveness of a cognitive strategy intervention in improving arithmetic computation based upon the PASS theory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(6), 591–597.
Nguyen, S. P., & Murphy, G. L. (2003). An apple is more than just a fruit: Cross-classification in children's concepts. Child Development, 74(6), 1783–1806.
Nigam, R. (2001). Dynamic assessment of graphic symbol combinations by children with autism. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities, 16(3), 190–197.
Olswang, L. B., Bain, B. A., & Johnson, G. A. (1992). Using dynamic assessment with children with language disorders. In Warren, S. F. & Reichle, J. E. (Eds.), Causes and effects in communication and language intervention (pp. 187–215). Baltimore: P. H. Brookes.
Osterrieth, P. A. (1944). Le Test de Copie d'Une Figure Complex : Contribution à l'étude de la perception et de la mémoire [The Complex Figure Test: Contribution to the study of perception and memory]. Éditions des Archives de Psychologie. Neuchâtel, Switzerland: Delachaux & Niestlé.
Otto, S. P. (2001). Intelligence, genetics of: Heritability and causation. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 7651–7658). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Owings, S., & Siefker, J. M. (1991). Criterion-referenced scoring versus norming: A critical discussion. Vocational Evaluation and Work Adjustment Bulletin, 24(3), 109–111.
Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.
Palisin, H. (1986). Preschool temperament and performance on achievement tests. Developmental Psychology, 22, 766–770.
Paour, J.-L. (1988). Retard mental et aides cognitives [Mental retardation and cognitive aides]. In Caverni, J.-P., Bastien, C., Mendelsohn, P., & Tiberghien, G. (Eds.), Psychologie cognitive: modèles et méthodes [Models and methods in cognitive psychology] (pp. 191–216). Grenoble, France: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
Parrila, R. K., Kendrick, M. E., Papapoulis, T. C., & Kirby, J. R. (1999). Efficacy of a cognitive reading remediation program for at-risk children in grade 1. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 27(2), 1–31.
Peña, E. (2000). Measurement of modifiability in children from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 2(2), 87–97.
Peña, E. (2001). Assessment of semantic knowledge: Use of feedback and clinical interviewing. Seminars in Speech and Language, 22, 51–64.
Peña, E. D., & Gillam, R. B. (2000). Dynamic assessment of children referred for speech and language evaluations. In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 543–575). Amsterdam: JAI Elsevier Science.
Peña, E., Iglesias, A., & Lidz, C. S. (2001). Reducing test bias through dynamic assessment of children's word learning ability. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 10, 138–154.
Peña, E., Miller, L., & Gillam, R. (1999). Dynamic assessment of narratives in children from diverse backgrounds. California Speech-Language-Hearing Association Magazine, 28(2), 12–13, 18.
Peña, E., Quinn, R., & Iglesias, A. (1992). Application of dynamic methods of language assessment: A nonbiased approach. Journal of Special Education, 26, 269–280.
Peña, E., & Valles, L. (1995). Language assessment and instructional programming for linguistically different learners: Proactive classroom processes. In Kayser, H. (Ed.), Bilingual speech-language pathology: An hispanic focus (pp. 129–152). San Diego, CA: Singular.
Peña, L. (1993). Dynamic assessment: A non-biased approach for assessing the language of young children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Peverly, S. T., & Kitzen, K. R. (1998). Curriculum-based assessment of reading skills: Consideration and caveats for school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools, 35, 29–47.
Piaget, J. (1950). Introduction à l'épistemologie génétique [Introduction to developmental epistemology]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York and Paris: International Universities Press.
Piaget, J. (1970). Le structuralisme [Structuralism]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (Que sais-je?, No. 1311).
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.
Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2003, October). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future (CALPER Working Papers, No. 1). University Park: Pennsylvania State University, Center for Advanced Language Proficiency Education and Research. Retrieved from calper.la.psu.edu/downloads/download.php?3, November 23, 2005.
Reed, H. B. C., Jr. (1968). The use of psychological tests in diagnosing brain damage in school children. In Haywood, H. C. (Ed.), Brain damage in school age children (pp. 109–127). Washington, DC: Council for Exceptional Children.
Reinharth, B. M. (1989). Cognitive modifiability in developmentally delayed children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, New York.
Reitan, R. M. (1962). Psychological deficit. Annual Review of Psychology, 13, 415–444.
Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1985). The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and clinical interpretation. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.
Renzulli, J. S., & Westberg, K. L. (1991). Scale for rating students' participation in the local gifted education program. In Hunsaker, S. L., Frasier, M. M., Frank, E., Finley, V., & Klekotka, P. (1995). Performance of economically disadvantaged students placed in gifted programs through the Research-Based Assessment Plan (No. RM95208; p. 45). Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
Reschly, D. J. (1987). Assessing educational handicaps. In Weiner, I. B., Hess, A. K., & Allen, K. (Eds.), Handbook of forensic psychology (pp. 155–187). New York: Wiley.
Reschly, D. J. (1997). Diagnostic and treatment utility of intelligence tests. In Flanagan, D. P., Genschaft, J. L., & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 437–456). New York: Guilford Press.
Rey, A. (1959). Test de copie et de réproduction de mémoire de figures géométriques complexes [Test of copying and reproducing from memory of complex geometric figures]. Paris: Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
Rey, A. (1941). L'examen psychologique dans les cas d'encéphalopathie traumatique [Psychological assessment in cases of traumatic brain injury]. Archives de Psychologie, 28, 112.
Rey, A. (1959). Test de copie et de réproduction de mémoire de figures géométriques complexes [Test of copying and reproducing from memory of complex geometric figures]. Paris: Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
Richards, R., Berninger, V., Nagy, W., Parsons, A., Field, K., & Richards, A. (2004). Dynamic assessment of child dyslexics' brain response to alternative spelling treatments. Education and Child Psychology, 22(2), 62–80.
Rosch, E. (1999). Principles of categorization. In Sternberg, R. J. & Wagner, R. K. (Eds.), Readings in cognitive psychology (pp. 225–241). Ft. Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College.
Roseberry, C. A., & Connell, P. J. (1991). The use of an invented language rule in the differentiation of normal and language-impaired Spanish-speaking children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 596–603.
Rosenfield, S. (1987). Instructional consultation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rumbaugh, D. M., & Washburn, D. A. (2003). Intelligence of apes and other rational beings. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Saldaña, D. (2004). Dynamic Master Mind: Interactive use of a game for testing metacognition. School Psychology International, 25(4), 422–438.
Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1991). Assessment (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Sattler, J. M. (1988). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Author.
Scarr-Salapatek, S. (1975). Genetics and the development of intelligence. In Horowitz, F. D., Hetherington, M., Scarr-Salapatek, S., & Siegel, G. (Eds.), Review of child development research (Vol. 4, pp. 1–57). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sclan, S. G. (1986). Dynamic assessment and thought disorder in paranoid and nonparanoid schizophrenic patients. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Schlatter, C., & Büchel, F. P. (2000). Detecting reasoning abilities of persons with moderate mental retardation: The Analogical Reasoning Learning Test (ARLT). In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 155–186). Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.
Schloss, P. J., Smith, M. A., Hoover, T., & Wolford, J. (1987). Dynamic criterion-referenced vocational assessment: An alternative strategy for handicapped youth. Diagnostique, 12(2), 74–86.
Schneider, E., & Ganshow, L. (2000). Dynamic assessment and instructional strategies for learners who struggle to learn foreign language. Dyslexia, 6, 72–82.
Schwebel, A. I. (1966). Effects of impulsivity on performance of verbal tasks in middle- and lower-class children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 36, 13–21.
Shurin, R. (1998). Validity and reliability of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale with preschool children with disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED435681; Clearinghouse Identifier: TM030312)
Siegler, R. S. (1998). Children's thinking (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Snow, R. E., & Yalow, E. (1982). Education and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 493–585). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Spector, J. E. (1992). Predicting progress in beginning reading: Dynamic assessment of phonemic awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 353–363.
Steiner, J. (1993). Psychic retreats: Pathological organizations in psychotic, neurotic, and borderline patients. London: Routledge.
Sternberg, R. J. (1982). Reasoning, problem solving, and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 225–307). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Swanson, H. L. (1992). Generality and modifiability of working memory among skilled and less skilled readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 473–488.
Swanson, H. L. (1995). Effects of dynamic assessment on the classification of learning disabilities: The predictive and discriminant validity of the Swanson-Cognitive Processing Test (S-CPT). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 13, 204–229.
Swanson, H. L. (2000). Swanson-Cognitive Processing Test: Review and applications. In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 71–107). Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.
Swanson, H. L., & Alexander, J. E. (1997). Cognitive processes as predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension in learning-disabled and skilled readers. Revisiting the specificity hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 128–158.
Switzky, H. N., & Haywood, H. C. (1974). Motivational orientation and the relative efficacy of self-monitored and externally imposed reinforcement systems in children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 360–366.
Szymula, G. (1990). Vocational assessment. In Schiro-Geist, C. (Ed.), Vocational counseling for special populations (pp. 65–97). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
Tanner, H., & Jones, S. (2002). Assessment of children's mathematical thinking in practical modeling situations. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 21(4), 145–159.
Tatik, T. (2000). A concurrent validity study between the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale and the Leiter-Revised International Performance Test. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED445033; Clearinghouse Identifier TM031638.)
Tawney, J. W., & Gast, D. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Teo, A., Carlson, E., Mathieu, P. J., Egeland, B., & Sroufe, L. A. (1996). A prospective longitudinal study of psychosocial predictors of achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 34(3), 285–306.
Tissink, J., Hamers, J. H. M., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (1993). Learning potential tests with domain-general and domain-specific tasks. In Hamers, J. H. M., Sijtsma, K., & Ruijssenaars, A. J. J. M. (Eds.), Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 243–266). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Tymchuk, A. (1973). Effects of verbal concept training versus stimulus enhancement on verbal abstracting in institutionalized retarded delinquent boys. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 551–555.
Tzuriel, D. (2000). The Cognitive Modifiability Battery (CMG): Assessment and intervention. In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 375–406). Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier.
Tzuriel, D. (2001). Dynamic assessment of young children. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Tzuriel, D., & Haywood, H. C. (1984). Exploratory behavior as a function of motivational orientation and task conditions. Personality and Individual Differences, 5(1), 67–76.
Tzuriel, D., & Haywood, H. C. (1985). Locus of control and child-rearing practices in intrinsically motivated and extrinsically motivated children. Psychological Reports, 57, 887–894.
Tzuriel, D., & Klein, P. S. (1985). Analogical thinking modifiability in disadvantaged, regular, special education, and mentally retarded children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 539–552.
Tzuriel, D., & Samuels, M. T. (2000). Dynamic assessment of learning potential: Inter-rater reliability of deficient cognitive functions, type of mediation, and non-intellective factors. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 1, 41–64. Retrieved March 3, 2005 from www.iacep.coged.org/journal.
Tzuriel, D., & Schanck, T. (1994, July). Assessment of learning potential and reflectivity-impulsivity dimension. Paper presented at the 23rd International Congress of Applied Psychology, Madrid, Spain.
Utley, C. A., Haywood, H. C., & Masters, J. C. (1992). Policy implications of psychological assessment of minority children. In Haywood, H. C. & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 445–469). New York: Springer.
Valencia, S. W., Campione, J. C., Weiner, S., & Bazzi, S. (1990, December). Dynamic assessment of reading achievement. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL.
Van der Aalsvoort, G. M., & Lidz, C. S. (2002). Reciprocity in dynamic assessment in classrooms: Taking contextual influences on individual learning into account. In Aaslsvoort, G. M., Resing, W. C. M., & Ruijssenaars, A. J. J. M. (Eds.), Learning potential assessment and cognitive training: Actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology (pp. 111–144). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Aalsvoort, G. M., & Lidz, C. S. (in press). A cross-cultural validation study of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale: A dynamic assessment procedure, with Dutch first grade students from regular primary schools. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 24(1).
Vaughn, B. E., Kopp, C. B., & Krakow, J. B. (1984). The emergence and consolidation of self-control from eighteen to thirty months of age: Normative trends and individual differences. Child Development, 55(3), 990–1004.
Vye, N. J., Burns, M. S., Delclos, V. R., & Bransford, J. D. (1987). A comprehensive approach to assessing intellectually handicapped children. In Lidz, C. S. (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 327–359). New York: Guilford Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1929). The problem of the cultural development of the child. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 36, 415–434.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1934)
Warren, A. (2002). MATHPLAN: A Diagnostic and Prescriptive Task Collection: A trip to the toystore. Cambridge, MA: Balanced Assessment in Mathematics Project, Harvard University, Educational Technology Center.
Warren, A. (2003, July). MATHPLAN: A Diagnostic and Prescriptive Task Collection: A Trip to the Toystore: A plan for evaluating the validity and reliability of a new dynamic assessment instrument. Unpublished paper presented at the International Association for Cognitive Education and Psychology Conference, Seattle, WA.
Warren, A. R. (2006). Evaluating the evaluator: An examination of two new methods for evaluating the skills of the teacher as dynamic assessor. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Weiss, A. A. (1964). The Weigl-Goldstein-Scheerer Color-Form Sorting Test: Classification of performance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20, 103–107.
Wellman, H. M., Ritter, K., & Flavell, J. (1975). Deliberate memory development in the delayed reactions of very young children. Developmental Psychology, 11, 780–787. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED445033; Clearinghouse Identifier TM031638)
Wheeler, L., & Reitan, R. M. (1962). The presence and laterality of brain-damage predicted from responses to a short aphasia screening test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 15, 783–799.
Wiedl, K. H. (1999). Cognitive modifiability as a measure of readiness for rehabilitation. Psychiatric Services, 50(11), 1411–1413.
iedl, K. H. (2003). Dynamic testing: A comprehensive model and current fields of application. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 3, 93–119. Retrieved from www.iacep.coged.org/journal, December 3, 2003.
Wiedl, K. H., & Schottke, H. (2002). Vorhersage des Erfolgs schizophrener Patienten in Einem psychedukativen Behandlungsprogramm durch indikatoren des Veranderungspotentials im Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Verhaltenstherapie, 12(2), 90–96.
Wiedl, K. H., Schottke, H., Garcia, M., Calero, D. (2001). Dynamic assessment of cognitive rehabilitation potential in schizophrenic persons and in elderly persons with and without dementia. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 17(2), 112–119.
Wiedl, K. H., Schottke, H., Green, M. F., & Nuechterlein, K. H. (2004). Dynamic testing in schizophrenia: Does training change the construct validity of a test? Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30(4), 703–711.
Wiedl, K. H., Wienobst, J., Schottke, H. H., Green, M. F., & Nuechterlein, K. H. (2001). Attentional characteristics of schizophrenia patients differing in learning proficiency on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 27(4), 687–696.
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., & Rodriguez, D. (1998). The development of children's motivation in school contexts. In Pearson, P. D. & Iran-Nigad, A. (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 23). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Williams, R. H., & Zimmerman, D. W. (1996). Are simple gain scores obsolete? Applied Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 59–69.
Wood, D. (1988). How children think and learn: The social contexts of cognitive development. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
Woodcock, R. W. (2002). New looks in the assessment of cognitive ability. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(2), 6–22.
Zelazo, P. D., Müller, U., Frye, D., & Marcovitch, S. (2003). The development of executive function in early childhood. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 68, Serial No. 274.
Zigler, E., Abelson, W. D., & Seitz, V. (1973). Motivational factors in the performance of economically disadvantaged children on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Child Development, 44, 294–303.
Zigler, E., & Butterfield, E. C. (1968). Motivational aspects of changes in IQ test performance of culturally deprived nursery school children. Child Development, 39, 1–14.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.