Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display. Radiology 2002; 223: 483–8., , , et al.
Moving into the digital era: a novel experience with the first full-field digital mammography system in Malaysia. Singapore Med J 2007; 48: 804–7., ,
Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 38–41., , , et al.
Timed efficiency of interpretation of digital and film-screen screening mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 216–20., , , et al.
Comparison of reading time between screen-film mammography and soft-copied, full-field digital mammography. Breast Cancer 2009; 16: 58–61., , , ,
A methodology to evaluate differential costs of full field digital as compared to conventional screen film mammography in a clinical setting. Eur J Radiol 2006; 57: 69–75., , ,
Results of a survey on digital screening mammography: prevalence, efficiency, and use of ancillary diagnostic aids. J Am Coll Radiol 2008; 5: 585–92., , , et al.
Cost and cost-effectiveness of digital mammography compared with film-screen mammography in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health 2009; 33: 430–6., , , ,
2012).. ACR-AAPM-SIIM practice guideline for determinants of image quality in digital mammography 2007. (accessed April
Conspicuity of microcalcifications on digital screening mammograms using varying degrees of monitor zooming. Acad Radiol 2009; 16: 1509–17., , , et al.
Detection of microcalcifications on digital screening mammograms using varying degrees of monitor zooming. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: 761–8., , , et al.
Detection of masses and microcalcifications of breast cancer on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors and 5-megapixel LCD monitors: an observer performance study. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 1365–71., , , et al.
Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting. Acta Radiol 2008; 49: 623–9.,
Diagnostic performance of detecting breast cancer on computed radiographic (CR) mammograms: comparison of hard copy film, 3-megapixel liquid-crystal-display (LCD) monitor and 5-megapixel LCD monitor. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 2363–9., , , ,
Gestalt theory: implications for radiology education. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190: 1156–60.,
Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study. Radiology 2007; 242: 396–402., , ,
Why does it take longer to read digital than film-screen screening mammograms? A partial explanation. J Digit Imaging 2010; 23: 170–80., , , et al.
The effect of digitising film prior mammograms on radiologists’ performance in breast screening: a JAFROC study. Proc SPIE 2009; 7263: 726311. DOI: 10.1117/12.810902., , , .
Full-field digital mammographic interpretation with prior analog versus prior digitized analog mammography: time for interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: 1436–8., , , et al.
Observer variability in screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 1134–43., , , et al.
Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: Oslo I Study. Radiology. 2003; 229: 877–84., ,
Does intensity windowing improve the detections of simulated calcifications in dense mammograms?J Digital Imaging 1997; 10: 79–84., , , et al.
The effect of intensity windowing on the detection of simulated masses embedded in dense portions of digitized mammograms in a laboratory setting. J Digital Imaging 1997; 10: 174–82., , , et al.
Differential use of image enhancement techniques by experienced and inexperienced observers. J Digit Imaging 2005; 18: 311–5., , ,
2012).. National Horizon Scanning Report. Computer aided detection systems in mammography. Commonwealth of Australia, 2004. (accessed April
Screening-detected breast cancers: discordant independent double reading in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2009; 253: 652–60., , ,
Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection – prospective evaluation. Radiology 2006; 239: 375–83., , ,
Radiologists’ perceptions of computer aided detection versus double reading for mammography interpretation. Acad Radiol 2010; 17: 1217–26., , , et al.
Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study. Radiology 2005; 237: 444–9., ,
Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189: 1135–41., , , et al.
Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001; 220: 781–6.,
Computer aided detection as evidence in the courtroom: potential implications of an appellate court’s ruling. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186: 48–51, ,
Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists: findings from a national sample. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 209–13., ,
Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96: 185–90., , , et al.
Re: Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96: 1260–1., , ,
Computer-aided detection performance in mammographic examination of masses: assessment. Radiology 2004; 233: 418–23., , , et al.
Effect of human variability on independent double reading in screening mammography. Acad Radiol 1996; 3: 891–7., ,
European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis 4th ed: summary document. Ann Oncol 2008; 19: 614–22., , , et al.
Interpretation time of computer-aided detection at screening mammography. Radiology 2010; 257: 40–6., , , et al.
The use of batch reading to improve the performance of screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185: 790–6., , ,
2006. screening.iarc.fr/doc/ND7306954ENC_002.pdf (accessed April 2012)., , , et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 4th edn. Brussels: European Communities,
Ambient lighting: effect of illumination on soft-copy viewing of radiographs of the wrist. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: W177–80., , , et al.
Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 1010–18., , , et al.
Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program: the Oslo II Study. Radiology 2004; 232: 197–204., .
Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2009; 253: 353–8, , , et al.
Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189: 860–6., , , et al.
Reduction in false-positive results after introduction of digital mammography: analysis from four population-based breast cancer screening programs in Spain. Radiology 2011; 258: 388–95., , , et al.
Digital versus screen-film mammography: a retrospective comparison in a population-based screening program. Eur J Radiol 2007; 64: 419–25., , , et al.
Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography in a population-based screening program: the Sogn and Fjordane study. Acta Radiol 2010; 51: 962–8., , , et al.
Comparison of standard reading and computer aided diagnosis (CAD) on a national proficiency test of screening mammography. Eur J Radiol 2003; 45: 135–38., , , et al.
Comparison of standard reading and computer aided diagnosis (CAD) on a proficiency test of screening mammography. Radiol Med 2003; 106: 59–65., , , et al.
Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial. Radiology 2004; 231: 208–14., , , et al.
Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting. Radiology 2005; 236: 451–7., ,
Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185: 944–50., ,
Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 1483–91., , ,
Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 20–8.,