Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T01:29:46.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6 - Approaches to Culture-Oriented Research and Teaching

from Research and Statistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2018

Kenneth D. Keith
Affiliation:
University of San Diego
Get access

Summary

Studies of children from diverse cultures help students and experts alike to see the full scope of child development. Moreover, cultural research on children enables psychological scientists to further test and delineate the nature of developmental processes and phenomena that have been mostly understood within limited cultural settings. Mainstream psychologists increasingly recognize the importance of cultural context to the field of child development and experts share a common goal to create a more universal developmental psychology applicable to children across cultures. As a result, a substantial body of cultural developmental research exists, and a number of resources are available to aid the instructor wishing to offer a more inclusive portrayal of child development.
Type
Chapter
Information
Culture across the Curriculum
A Psychology Teacher's Handbook
, pp. 134 - 156
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allwood, C. M. (1998). The creation and nature(s) of indigenized psychologies from the perspective of the anthropology of knowledge. In Gorenstein, S. (Ed.), Knowledge and society (Vol. 11, pp. 153172). Greenwich, CT: Jai.Google Scholar
Allwood, C .M. (2011). On the foundation of the indigenous psychologies. Social Epistemology, 25, 314. doi:10.1080/02691728.2010.534564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allwood, C. M. (2012). The distinction between qualitative and quantitative research methods is problematic. Quality & Quantity, 46, 14171429. doi:10.1007/s11135-011-9455-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allwood, C. M., & Berry, J. W. (2006). Origins and development of indigenous psychologies: An international analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 41, 243268. doi:10.1080/00207590544000013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63, 602614. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atran, S. (2001). The trouble with memes inference versus imitation in cultural creation. Human Nature, 12, 351381. doi:10.1007/s12110-001-1003-0Google Scholar
Atran, S., Medin, D. L., & Ross, N. O. (2005). The cultural mind: Environmental decision making and cultural modeling within and across populations. Psychological Review, 112, 744776. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.744CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berry, J. W. (1989). Imposed etics-emics-derived etics: The operationalization of a compelling idea. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 721735. doi:10.1080/00207598908247841Google Scholar
Berry, J. W., & Triandis, H. C. (2006). Culture. In Pawlik, K. & d’Ydewalle, G. (Eds.), Psychological concepts: An international historical perspective (pp. 4762). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Boesch, E. E. (1996). The seven flaws of cross-cultural psychology: The story of a conversion. Mind, Culture and Activity, 3(1), 210. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca0301_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110, 203219. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.203Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M., Oakland, T., Leong, F. T. L., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Hambleton, R. K., Cheung, F. M., & Bartram, D. (2009). A critical analysis of cross-cultural research and testing practices: Implications for improved education and training in psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3, 94105. doi:10.1037/a0014516Google Scholar
Church, A. T., & Katigbak, M. S. (2002). Indigenization of psychology in the Philippines. International Journal of Psychology, 37, 129148. doi:10.1080/00207590143000315Google Scholar
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, M., & Scribner, S. (1974). Culture and thought. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cox, M. V., & Bayraktar, R. (1989). A cross-cultural study of children’s human figure drawings. Presented at the Tenth Biennial Conference of the International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Earp, B. D., & Trafimow, D. (2015). Replication, falsification, and the crises of confidence in social psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(621), 111. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00621Google Scholar
Fowler, D. D., & Hardesty, D. L. (Eds.). (1994). Others knowing others: Perspective on ethnographic careers. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. (1997). You can’t take it with you: Why ability assessments don’t cross cultures. American Psychologist, 52, 11151124. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.10.1115Google Scholar
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Culture and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Idhe, D. (1977). Experimental phenomenology: An introduction. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Kashima, Y. (2005). Is culture a problem for social psychology? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 1938. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839X.2005.00154.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, U., & Park, Y.-S. (2006). The scientific foundation of indigenous and cultural psychology. In Kim, U., Yang, K.-S., & Hwang, K.-K. (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 2748). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/0-387-28662-4_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, U., Yang, K.-S., & Hwang, K.-K. (2006). Contributions to indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context. In Kim, U., Yang, K.-S., & Hwang, K.-K. (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 325). New York, NY: Springer. doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28662-4_1Google Scholar
Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (LCHC). (1982). Culture and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 642719). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. (1979). On the interface of cognition and personality: Beyond the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 34, 740754. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.9.740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently … and why. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291310. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.108.2.291Google Scholar
Romney, A. K., Weller, S. C., & Batchelder, W. H. (1986). Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist, 88, 313338. doi:10.1525/aa.1986.88.2.02a00020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2008). A situated cognition perspective on culture: Effects of priming cultural syndromes on cognition and motivation. In Sorrentino, R. M. & Yamaguchi, S. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition across cultures (pp. 237265). New York, NY: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-373694-9.00011-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savani, K., Cho, J., Baik, S., & Morris, M. W. (2015). Culture and judgment and decision making. In Wu, G. & Keren, G. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 456477). Oxford: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118468333.ch16Google Scholar
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674433014Google Scholar
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Shebani, M. F. A., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2008). Memory development in Libyan and Dutch school children. European Journal of Development Psychology, 5, 419438. doi:10.1080/17405620701343204Google Scholar
Shostak, M. (1983). Nisa: The life and words of a !Kung woman. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. (1990). Cultural psychology – What is it? In Stigler, J., Shweder, R., & Herdt, G. (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 143). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173728.002Google Scholar
Smith, P. B., Bond, M. H., & Kagitcibasi, C. (2006). Understanding social psychology across cultures. London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446212028Google Scholar
Spradley, J. P., & McCurdy, D. W. (1980). Anthropology: The cultural perspective (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1980). Preface. In Triandis, H. C. & Lonner, W. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 3. Basic processes (pp. viiixix). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. doi:10.1525/aa.1982.84.2.02a00060Google Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Tanzer, N. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 54, 119135. doi:10.1016/j.erap.2003.12.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Someren, M. W., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. A. C. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Viswanathan, M. (2005). Measurement error and research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412984935Google Scholar
Weber, E. U., & Morris, M. W. (2010). Culture and judgment and decision making: The constructivist turn. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 410419. doi:10.1177/1745691610375556CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×