Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:37:31.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Sustainable Consumption, Consumer Protection and Sustainable Development: Unbundling Institutional Septet for Developing Economies

from Part III - Normative and Utility Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2019

By
Onyeka K. Osuji  and
Ugochi C. Amajuoyi
Edited by
Onyeka Osuji ,
Franklin N. Ngwu  and
Dima Jamali
Onyeka Osuji
Affiliation:
University of Essex
Franklin N. Ngwu
Affiliation:
Pan-Atlantic University, Nigeria
Dima Jamali
Affiliation:
American University of Beirut
Get access

Summary

The chapter draws on the legal, institutional and stakeholder perspectives to develop a septet framework that provides clarity to the concept of sustainable consumption and production and aligns consumer protection to sustainable development in developing countries. This contextualises the roles of consumers and corporations as institutional actors and consumption as an institution. The chapter uniquely unbundles the concept as consisting of six foundational components: sustainable consumption by proximate consumers for future generations; sustainable production for future generations; sustainable consumption by/for proximate consumers; sustainable production for proximate consumers; participation by proximate consumers; and CSR. The septet framework challenges conventional approaches to consumer vulnerability, disclosure regulation, contract law, consumer responsibilisation, stakeholder, corporate governance, institutional voids and international cooperation. The chapter’s interventionist consumer protection law approach includes public interest-oriented disclosure regulation, distributive justice-oriented contract law, resolution of business-to-consumer information asymmetry, credible corporate social reporting and certification standards, distributed/shared consumer responsibilisation, stakeholder enforcement rights, obligations and protection, independent stakeholder determination of standards, resolution of related agency problems through a stakeholder approach to corporate governance and international cooperation in regulatory standards and enforcement. It is also argued that a consumer protection approach to sustainable development can promote stakeholder engagement and meaningful corporate social responsibility.

Keywords

Consumer ProtectionCorporate Social ResponsibilityDeveloping CountriesEthical ConsumptionInstitutional VoidsInstitutionsRegulationStakeholderSustainable ConsumptionSustainable Development
Type
Chapter
Information
Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing and Emerging Markets
Institutions, Actors and Sustainable Development
 , pp. 395 - 437
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D. (2009). Introduction to modern economic growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. and Robinson, J. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In Aghion, P. and Durlauf, S., eds., Handbook of Economic Growth Volume 1A, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 386–472.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. and Robinson, J. A. (2002), Reversal of fortune: Geography and institutions in the making of the modern world income distribution. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(4),1231–94.Google Scholar
Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (2009). The economics of growth. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Akinbami, F. (2011). Financial services and consumer protection after the crisis. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 29(2),134–47.Google Scholar
Aldohni, A. (2017). The UK new regulatory framework of High-Cost Short-Term Credit: Is there a shift towards a more ‘Law and Society’ based approach? Journal of Consumer Policy, 40(3),321–45.Google Scholar
Altschuller, S. A., Lehr, A. and Orsmond, A. J. (2010). Corporate social responsibility. The International Lawyer, 45(1),179–89.Google Scholar
Anabtawi, I. and Stout, L. (2008). Fiduciary duties for activist shareholders. Stanford Law Review, 60(5),1255–308.Google Scholar
Andorfer, V. and Liebe, U. (2013). Consumer behavior in moral markets. On the relevance of identity, justice beliefs, social norms, status, and trust in ethical consumption. European Sociological Review, 29(6),1251–65.Google Scholar
Andorfer, V. and Liebe, U. (2015). Do information, price, or morals influence ethical consumption? A natural field experiment and customer survey on the purchase of fair trade coffee. Social Science Research, 52,330–50.Google Scholar
Antonetti, P. and Maklan, S. (2014). Feelings that make a difference: How guilt and pride convince consumers of the effectiveness of sustainable consumption choices. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(1),117–34.Google Scholar
Armour, J., Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R. (2017). Agency Problems and Legal Strategies. In Kraakman, R., Armour, J., Davies, P., Enriques, L., Hasnmann, H., Hertig, G., Hopt, K., Kanda, H., Pargendler, M., Ringe, W. and Rock, E., eds., The anatomy of corporate law: A comparative and functional approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 29–48.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R., Cave, M. and Lodge, M. (2012). Understanding regulation: Theory, strategy, and practice 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Balmer, J., Powell, S. and Greyser, S. (2011). Explicating ethical corporate marketing. Insights from the BP deepwater horizon catastrophe: The ethical brand that exploded and then imploded. Journal of Business Ethics, 102,1–14.Google Scholar
Bantekas, I. (2004). Corporate social responsibility in international law. Boston University International Law Journal, 22,309–47.Google Scholar
Bar-Gill, O. and Warren, E. (2008). Making credit safer. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 157(1),1–101.Google Scholar
Barnett, C., Cloke, P., Clarke, N. and Malpass, A. (2011). Globalizing responsibilities: The political rationalities of ethical consumption. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Beck, T. and Levine, R. (2005). Legal institutions and financial development. In Menard, C. and Shirley, M., eds., Handbook of new institutional economics, Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Ben-Shahar, O. (2009). The myth of the ‘Opportunity to Read’ in contract law. European Review of Contract Law, 5(1),1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berle, A. and Means, G. (1991). The modern corporation and private property. London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Bernd, H., Spraul, K. and Ingenhoff, D. (2016). Under positive pressure: How stakeholder pressure affects corporate social responsibility implementation. Business & Society, 55(2),151–87.Google Scholar
Black, B. (2001). The legal and institutional preconditions for strong securities markets. UCLA Law Review, 48(4), 781–856.Google Scholar
Black, I. (2010). Sustainability through anti-consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6),403–11.Google Scholar
Blake, J. (1999). Overcoming the ‘value – action gap’ in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environment, 4,257–78.Google Scholar
Bray, J. and Johns, N. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4),597–608.Google Scholar
Burnett, M. and Welford, R. (2007). Case study: Coca-Cola and water in India: Episode 2. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management, 14(5),298–304.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. L., Heinrich, D. and Schoenmüller, V. (2015). Consumers’ reaction to fair trade motivated price increases. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 24,79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrington, M. J., Zwick, D. and Neville, B. (2016). The ideology of the ethical consumption gap. Marketing Theory, 16(1),21–38.Google Scholar
Cartwright, P. (2011). The vulnerable consumer of financial services: Law, policy and regulation. Available at www.nottingham.ac.uk/business/businesscentres/gcbfi/documents/researchreports/paper78.pdf. accessed 10 December 2018.Google Scholar
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N. and Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of Business Ethics, 84,1–15.Google Scholar
Cedillo Torres, C. A., Garcia-French, M., Hordijk, R., Nguyen, K. and Olup, L. (2012). Four case studies on corporate social responsibility: Do conflicts affect a company’s corporate social responsibility policy? Utrecht Law Review, 8(3),51–73.Google Scholar
Centre for International Environmental Law [CIEL] (2017). Are Belgium and the Netherlands in breach of their international obligations under the Basel Convention and customary international law due to their export of high sulfur fuels to certain developing countries in Africa that are Parties of the Bamako Convention? Available at www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/High-sulfur-fuels_CIEL-legal-opinion-23_01_2017-.pdf. accessed 10 December 2018.Google Scholar
Chang, H. A. J. (2011). Institutions and economic development: Theory, policy and history, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(4),473–98.Google Scholar
Cheffins, B. (2001). Does law matter? The separation of ownership and control in the United Kingdom. Journal of Legal Studies, 30(2),459–84.Google Scholar
Cherednychenko, O. (2010). Conceptualizing unconscionability in the context of risky financial transactions: How do converge public and private law approaches? In Kenny, M, Devenney, J and Fox O’Mahony, L., eds., Unconscionability in European Private Financial Transactions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 246–74.Google Scholar
Cherrier, H., Szuba, M. and Özçağlar-Toulouse, N. (2012). Barriers to downward carbon emission: Exploring sustainable consumption in the face of the glass floor. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3/4),397–419.Google Scholar
Christian Aid (2018). Counting the cost: A year of climate breakdown. 27 December 2018. London: Christian Aid.Google Scholar
Clarke, N., Barnett, C., Cloke, P. and Malpass, A. (2007). Globalising the consumer: Doing politics in an ethical register. Political Geography, 26(3),231–49.Google Scholar
Clarkson, J. J., Janiszewski, C. and Cinelli, M. D. (2013). The desire for consumption knowledge. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6),1313–29.Google Scholar
Coase, R. (1960). The problem of social cost, Journal of Law and Economics, 3,1–44.Google Scholar
Coase, R. (1975). Economists and public policy. In Weston, J. F, ed., Large corporations in a changing society, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Coffee, J. C. (2001). The Rise of Dispersed Ownership: The Roles of Law and the State in the Separation of Ownership and Control. Yale Law Journal, 111,1–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffee, J. C. (2007). Law and the Market: The Impact of Enforcement. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 156(2),229–312.Google Scholar
Collins, H. (1992). Distributive justice through contracts. Current Legal Problems, 45(2),49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H. (2004). Regulating contract law. In Parker, C., Scott, C., Lacey, N. and Braithwaite, J., eds., Regulating law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 13–32.Google Scholar
Crête, R. (2016). The Volkswagen scandal from the viewpoint of corporate governance. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 7(1),25–31.Google Scholar
Dam, K. (2006), The law-growth nexus. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Darnall, N., Ji, H. and Vázquez-Brust, D. A. (2018). Third-party certification, sponsorship, and consumers’ ecolabel use. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4),153–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jonge, A. (2011). Transnational corporations and international law: bringing TNCs out of the accountability vacuum. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 7(1),66–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills [DBIS] (2010). Corporate law and governance. The future of narrative reporting: a consultation. Available at www.gov.uk/government/consultations/the-future-of-narrative-reporting-a-consultation accessed 10 December 2018.Google Scholar
Deva, S. (2012). Regulating corporate human rights violations, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Doh, J. P., Littell, B. and Quigley, N. R. (2015). CSR and sustainability in emerging markets: Societal, institutional, and organizational influences. Organizational Dynamics, 44(2),112–20.Google Scholar
Domurath, I. (2013). The case for vulnerability as the normative standard in European consumer credit and mortgage law – An inquiry into the paradigms of consumer law. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 2(3),124–37.Google Scholar
Doorey, D. (2011). The transparent supply chain: From resistance to implementation at Nike and Levi-Strauss. Journal of Business Ethics, 103,587–603.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, F. and Fischel, D. (1984). Mandatory disclosure and the protection of investors, Virginia Law Review 70,669–715.Google Scholar
Easterly, W. (2008). Institutions: Top Down or Bottom Up? American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 98(2),95–9.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, G. M., Belk, R. and Devinney, T. M. (2010). Why don’t consumers consume ethically? Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6),426–36.Google Scholar
Enriques, L., Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R. (2017a). The interests of shareholders as a class. In Kraakman, R., Armour, J., Davies, P., Enriques, L., Hasnmann, H., Hertig, G., Hopt, K., Kanda, H., Pargendler, M., Ringe, W. and Rock, E., eds., The anatomy of corporate law: A comparative and functional approach, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 55–88.Google Scholar
Enriques, L., Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R. (2017b). The basic governance structure: Minority shareholders and non-shareholder constituencies. In Kraakman, R., Armour, J., Davies, P., Enriques, L., Hasnmann, H., Hertig, G., Hopt, K., Kanda, H., Pargendler, M., Ringe, W. and Rock, E. eds., The anatomy of corporate law: A comparative and functional approach, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 89–114.Google Scholar
European Commission (2015). Closing the loop – An EU action plan for the Circular Economy. COM(2015) 614 final. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:8a8ef5e8-99a0-11e5-b3b7-01aa75ed71a1.0012.02/DOC_2&format=PDF accessed 10 December 2018.Google Scholar
European Commission (2017). EU action to curb air pollution by cars: Questions and answers. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-17–2821_en.htm accessed 10 December 2018.Google Scholar
European Commission (2018). A European strategy for plastics in a circular economy. COM(2018) 28 final. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:2df5d1d2-fac7-11e7-b8f5-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF accessed 10 December 2018.Google Scholar
Evans, D. (2011). Thrifty, green or frugal: Reflections on sustainable consumption in a changing economic climate. Geoforum, 42(5),550–7.Google Scholar
Evans, D. (2018). What is consumption, where has it been going, and does it still matter? The Sociological Review. Available at https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118764028 accessed 10 December 2018.Google Scholar
Evans, D., Welch, D. and Sawffield, J. (2017). Constructing and mobilizing ‘the consumer’: Responsibility, consumption and the politics of sustainability. Environment and Planning, 49(6), 1396–1412,1–17.Google Scholar
Fairweather, K., Grantham, R. and O’Shea, P. (2017). Credit, consumers and the law: After the global storm. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Falkner, R. (2008). Business power and conflict in international environmental politics. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Falletti, T. G. and Cunial, S. L. (2018). Participation in social policy: Public health in comparative perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fassin, Y. (2009). The stakeholder model refined. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1),113–35.Google Scholar
Fejos, A. (2015). Achieving safety and affordability in the UK payday loans market. Journal of Consumer Policy, 38(2),181–202.Google Scholar
Fejos, A. (2018). Social justice in EU financial consumer law. Tilburg Law Review, 24(1),68–88.Google Scholar
Financial Services Authority [FSA] (2009). Mortgage market review. Available at www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/discussion/dp09_03.pdf accessed 15 August 2018.Google Scholar
Francioni, F. (1991). Exporting environmental hazard through multinational enterprises: Can the state of origin be held responsible? In Francioni, F and Scovazzi, T, eds., International responsibility for environmental harm. London: Graham & Trotman, pp. 275–98.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, 1st ed. Boston: Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times (13 September).Google Scholar
Gabaldon, P. and Gröschl, S. (2015). A few good companies: Rethinking firms’ responsibilities toward common pool resources. Journal of Business Ethics, 132,579–88.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. (2017). High-Cost credit in the UK: A philosophical justification for government intervention. In Fairweather, K., Grantham, R. and O’Shea, P., eds., Credit, Consumers and the Law: After the Global Storm, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 132–52.Google Scholar
Gerding, E. F. (2009). The subprime crisis and the link between consumer financial protection and systemic risk. FIU Law Review, 5,93–122.Google Scholar
Glaeser, E. and Shleifer, A. (2003). The rise of the regulatory state. Journal of Economic Literature, 41,401–25.Google Scholar
Gray, R., Owen, D. and Adams, C. (1996). Accounting & accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Green, T. and Peloza, J. (2014). Finding the right shade of green: The effect of advertising appeal type on environmentally friendly consumption. Journal of Advertising, 43(2),128–141.Google Scholar
Greif, A. (2006). Institutions and the path to the modern economy: Lessons from medieval trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guéniat, M., Harjono, M., Missbach, A. and Viredaz, G. (2016). Dirty diesel. How Swiss traders flood Africa with toxic fuels. A Public Eye Investigation, Lausanne: Public Eye.Google Scholar
Hardy, G., O’Malley, K. and Brindle, B. (2018). The domino effect: Exposing the knock-on effects of consumer problems. Citizens Advice.Google Scholar
Heilbrunn, J. (2004). Anti-corruption Commissions: Panacea or Real Medicine to Fight Corruption? World Bank Institute Working Paper Series 37234. available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/WBI/Resources/wbi37234Heilbrunn.pdf. accessed 15 August 2018.Google Scholar
Herlin, H. and Solitander, N. (2017). Corporate social responsibility as relief from responsibility: NPO legitimizations for corporate partnerships in contested terrains. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 13(1),2–22.Google Scholar
Hevia, M. (2013). The distributive understanding of contract law: Kronman on contract law and distributive justice. In Reasonableness and responsibility: A theory of contract law. Law and Philosophy Library, 101. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 19–32.Google Scholar
Hills, J. and Welford, R. (2005). Case study: Coca-Cola and water in India. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 12(3),168–77.Google Scholar
Hinton, E and Goodman, M. (2010). Sustainable consumption: Developments, considerations and new directions. In Redclift, M. and Woodgate, G., eds., International handbook of environmental sociology 2nd ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. pp. 245–61.Google Scholar
HM Revenue and Customs (2018). Carbon emissions tax. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/publications/carbon-emmisions-tax/carbon-emmisions-tax accessed 10 December 2018.Google Scholar
HM Treasury (2009). Reforming financial markets, Cm 7667.Google Scholar
HM Treasury (2011). A new approach to financial regulation: building a stronger system, Cm 8012.Google Scholar
HM Treasury (2012). A new approach to financial regulation: securing stability, protecting consumers, Cm 8268.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. (2006). What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40,1–25.Google Scholar
Hofsted, G. (1994). Cultures and organizations. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee. Sustainability of the fashion industry inquiry. Available at: www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/environmental-audit-committee/inquiries/parliament-192017/sustainability-of-the-fashion-industry-17-19/ accessed 26 November 2018.Google Scholar
Howells, G. (2005). The potential and limits of consumer empowerment by information. Journal of Law and Society 32(3),349–70.Google Scholar
Huffman, M. (2010). Bridging the divide? Theories for integrating competition law and consumer protection. European Competition Journal, 6(1),7–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husted, B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility practice from 1800–1914: Past initiatives and current debates. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(1),125–41.Google Scholar
Incardona, R. and Poncibò, C. (2007). The average consumer, the unfair commercial practices directive, and the cognitive revolution. Journal of Consumer Policy, 30,21–38.Google Scholar
Inderst, R. (2009). Retail finance: Thoughts on reshaping regulation and consumer protection after the financial crisis. European Business Organization Law Review, 10(3),455–64.Google Scholar
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources [ICUN] (1980). World conservation strategy: Living resource conservation for sustainable development. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. United Nations Environmental Programme and World Wildlife Fund.Google Scholar
Jackson, H. and Roe, M. (2009). Public and private enforcement of securities laws: Resource-based evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2),207–38.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4),305–60.Google Scholar
Johnstone, M.-L. and Tan, L. P. (2015). Exploring the gap between consumers’ green rhetoric and purchasing behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 132,311–28.Google Scholar
Karam, C. M. and Jamali, D. (2013). Gendering CSR in the Arab Middle East: An institutional perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1),31–68.Google Scholar
Keay, A. (2010). Stakeholder theory in corporate law: Has it got what it takes. Richmond Journal of Global Law and Business, 9(3),249–300.Google Scholar
Kidd, D. L. Jr and Daughtrey, W. H Jr. (2000). Adapting contract law to accommodate electronic contracts: Overview and suggestions. Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal, 26,215–80.Google Scholar
Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A. and Seppälä, J. (2018). Circular economy: The concept and its limitations. Ecological Economics, 143,37–46.Google Scholar
Kronman, A. T. (1980). Contract law and distributive justice. Yale Law Journal, 89, 472–511.Google Scholar
Kysar, D. A. (2005). Preferences for processes: Process/product distinction and the regulation of consumer choice. Harvard Law Review, 118,525–641.Google Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Schleifer, A. (2006). What works in securities laws? Journal of Finance, 61(1),1–32.Google Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Schleifer, A. (2008). The economic consequences of legal origins. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(2),285–332.Google Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Schleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. (1997). Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance, 52(3),1131–50.Google Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Schleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6),1113–55.Google Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Schleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2),3–27.Google Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Schleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics and Organisation, 15(1), 222–79.Google Scholar
Laming, H. (2017). Should the UK pay financial rewards to whistleblowers? Banker, 167(1096),12–12.Google Scholar
Landis, J. (1938). The administrative process. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Llewelyn, D., (1999). The Economic Rationale for Financial Regulation. Financial Services Authority FSA Occasional Papers on Financial Regulation. Available at www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/occpapers/op01.pdf accessed 15 August 2018.Google Scholar
Longo, C., Shankar, A. and Nuttall, P. (2019). ‘It’s not easy living a sustainable lifestyle’: How greater knowledge leads to dilemmas, tensions and paralysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(3),759–79.Google Scholar
Lucy, W. N. R. (1989). Contract as a mechanism of distributive justice. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 9(1),132–47.Google Scholar
Mansvelt, J. (2005). Geographies of consumption. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Maurisse, M. (2019). The blazing success of Swiss cigarettes in Africa: An investigation by Marie Maurisse, winner of Public Eye’s investigation award. Available at: http://stories.publiceye.ch/tobacco/ accessed 18 February 2019.Google Scholar
Micklitz, H. (2012). The expulsion of the concept of protection from the consumer law and the return of social elements in the civil law: A bittersweet polemic. Journal of Consumer Policy, 35,283–96.Google Scholar
Micklitz, H. (2013). Do consumers and businesses need a new architecture of consumer law? A thought-provoking impulse. Yearbook of European Law, 32(1),266–367.Google Scholar
Miles, J. (2009). Agreements for grown-ups. Cambridge Law Journal, 68(2),285–8.Google Scholar
Miles, S. (2017). Stakeholder theory classification: a theoretical and empirical evaluation of definitions. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(3),437–59.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2013). Justice for earthlings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Modigliani, F. and Perotti, E. (1997). Protection of minority interest and the development of security markets. Managerial and Decision Economics, 18(7),519–28.Google Scholar
Monye, F. (2017). An overview of consumer law in Nigeria and relationship with laws of other countries and organisations. Journal of Consumer Policy, 41(4),373–93.Google Scholar
Myles, P., Schick, L. and Okonta, O. (2018). Special report: Nigeria’s gas flare increase ahead 2020 deadline. Premium Times, Nigeria 25 November. Available at www.premiumtimesng.com/news/headlines/297472-special-report-nigerias-gas-flares-increase-ahead-2020-deadline.html accessed 25 November 2018.Google Scholar
Newholm, T., Newholm, S. and Shaw, D. (2015). A history for consumption ethics. Business History, 57(2),290–310.Google Scholar
Nield, S. (2010). Responsible lending and borrowing: Whereto low-cost home ownership? Legal Studies, 30(4),610–32.Google Scholar
North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2009). Draft recommendation of the council on good practices on financial education and awareness relating to credit. Available at https://one.oecd.org/document/C(2009)62/en/pdf accessed 15 August 2018.Google Scholar
OECD (2011). OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises 2011 edition. Available at www.oecd.org/corporate/mne/oecdguidelinesformultinationalenterprises.htm accessed 15 August 2018.Google Scholar
Omoteso, K. and Yusuf, H. (2017). Accountability of transnational corporations in the developing world: The case for an enforceable international mechanism. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 13(1),54–71.Google Scholar
Osuji, O. (2011). Transnational corporations and the protection of human rights: Non-financial reporting as an option. In Nault, D. and England, S. L., ed., Globalization and human rights in the developing world. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 83–117.Google Scholar
Osuji, O. (2012). Corporate social responsibility: Fairness and promise as the fundaments for juridification of social disclosures. Contemporary Issues in Law, 12(1),46–76.Google Scholar
Osuji, O. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, juridification and globalization: ‘Inventive interventionism’ for a ‘paradox’. International Journal of Law in Context, 11(3), 1–34.Google Scholar
Osuji, O. (2017). Responsible lending: Consumer protection and prudential regulation perspectives. In Fairweather, K., O’Shea, P. and Grantham, R., eds., Credit, consumers and the law: After the global storm. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 62–85.Google Scholar
Osuji, O. and Obibuaku, U. (2016). Rights and corporate social responsibility: Competing or complementary approaches to poverty reduction and socioeconomic rights? Journal of Business Ethics, 136(2), 329–47.Google Scholar
Overton, L. and Fox, L. (2018). Stakeholder conceptions of later-life consumer vulnerability in the financial services industry: Beyond financial capability? Journal of Consumer Policy, 41(3), 273–95.Google Scholar
Owens, S. (2000). Engaging the public: Information and deliberation in environmental policy. Environment and Planning, A32(7),1141–8.Google Scholar
Perera, C., Auger, P. and Klein, J. (2018). Green consumption practices among young environmentalists: A practice theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 152, 843–64.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. and Shavell, S. (2000). The economic theory of public enforcement of law. Journal of Economic Literature, 38,45–76.Google Scholar
Reich, N. (1992). Diverse approaches to consumer protection philosophy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 14(3), 257–92.Google Scholar
Roe, M. J. (2000). Political conditions to separating ownership from control. Stanford Law Review 53(3), 539–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowan, S. (2009). Protecting contractual expectations: An Australian perspective. 68(2) Cambridge Law Journal, 68(2),276–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, M. (2001). Institutional economics: Then and now. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(3),173–94.Google Scholar
Scherer, A. and Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: a review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4),899–931.Google Scholar
Shamir, R. (2008). The Age of responsibilization: On market-embedded morality. Economy and Society, 37,1–19.Google Scholar
Shaw, D., McMaster, R. and Newholm, T. (2016). Care and commitment in ethical consumption: An exploration of the ‘attitude-behaviour gap’. Journal of Business Ethics, 136, 251–65.Google Scholar
Shove, E. (2004). Changing human behaviour and lifestyle: A challenge for sustainable consumption? London: Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning, A 42(6),1273–85.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.Google Scholar
Spindler, G. (2011). Behavioural finance and investor protection regulations. Journal of Consumer Policy, 34,315–36.Google Scholar
Stadler, L. and Lin, H. (2019). Leveraging partnerships for environmental change: The interplay between the partnership mechanism and the targeted stakeholder group. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(3),869–91.Google Scholar
Strengers, Y. and Maller, C., eds., (2015). Social practices, intervention and sustainability: Beyond behaviour change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thøgersen, J., de Barcellos, M. D., Perin, M. G. and Zhou, Y. (2015). Consumer buying motives and attitudes towards organic food in two emerging markets: China and Brazil. International Marketing Review, 32(3/4),389–413.Google Scholar
Unilever (2017). Report shows a third of consumers prefer sustainable brands. 5 January 2017. Available at www.unilever.com/news/press-releases/2017/report-shows-a-third-of-consumers-prefer-sustainable-brands.html accessed 15 August 2018.Google Scholar
United Nations (2002). ‘Report of the world summit on sustainable development’. Johannesburg, South Africa, 26 August-4 September 2002. A/CONF.199/20. Available at www.un-documents.net/aconf199-20.pdf accessed 15 August 2018.Google Scholar
United Nations (2012). A 10-year framework of programmes on sustainable consumption and production patterns. A/CONF.216/5. Available at www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/CONF.216/5&Lang=E. accessed 15 August 2018.Google Scholar
United Nations (2016). United Nations guidelines for consumer protection. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2016). Diesel fuel sulphur levels: Global status June 2016. Available atwww.unep.org/Transport/New/PCFV/pdf/Maps_Matrices/world/sulphur/MapWorldSulphur_June2016.pdf accessed 30 December 2016.Google Scholar
United Nations. (1987). ‘Report of world commission on environment and development: Our common future’ (Brundtland Report). Available at www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf accessed 1 December 2018.Google Scholar
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Available at: www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang= accessed 15 August 2018.Google Scholar
Van Dam, C. (2011). Tort law and human rights: brothers in arms. Journal of European Tort Law, 2(3), 221–54.Google Scholar
Vogel, D. (2005). Social Responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, L., O’Neill, S. and Lorenzoni, I. (2010). Climate change or social change? Debate within, amongst, and beyond disciplines. Environment and Planning, A43,258–61.Google Scholar
Willett, C. (2018). Re-theorising consumer law. Cambridge Law Journal, 77(1),179–210.Google Scholar
Williams, T. (2007). Empowerment of whom and for what? Financial literacy education and the new regulation of consumer financial services. Law & Policy, 29(2),226–56.Google Scholar
Winans, K., Kendall, A. and Deng, H. (2017). The history and current applications of the circular economy concept. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68(1), pp.825–833.Google Scholar
World Bank/Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation University of Washington, Seattle (2013). The Cost of air pollution strengthening the economic case for action. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Health Organization [WHO] (2006). WHO Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide Global update 2005. Summary of risk assessment. Geneva: WHO Press. Available at http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/69477/1/WHO_SDE_PHE_OEH_06.02_eng.pdf accessed 30 November 2018.Google Scholar
Yoboué, M. and Kaufman, J. (2018). Inside the dirty fuels campaign: Lessons for business and human rights. Business and Human Rights Journal, 3(2),291–7.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×