ARC. 2018. Australian Research Council Linkage Program. Australian Government, Canberra. Available from www.arc.gov.au/linkage-program (accessed 30 July 2018).
Balian, E. V., Drius, L., Eggermont, H., et al. 2016. Supporting evidence-based policy on biodiversity and ecosystem services: recommendations for effective policy briefs. Evidence & Policy, 12, 431–451. doi:10.1332/174426416X14700777371551
Banks, G. 2009. Evidence-based policy-making: What is it? How do we get it? ANU Public Lecture Series, presented by ANZSOG, 4 February., Productivity Commission, Canberra.
Blair, T., & Cunningham, J. 1999. Modernising Government. London: Prime Minister and Minister for the Cabinet Office.
Boydell, K. M., Dew, A., Hodgins, M., et al. 2017. Deliberative dialogues between policy-makers and researchers in Canada and Australia. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 28, 13–22. doi:10.1177/1044207317694840
Burgman, M. A. 2015a. Governance for effective policy-relevant scientific research: the shared governance model. Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, 2, 441–451. doi:10.1002/app5.104
Burgman, M. A. 2015b. Trusting Judgements: How to Get the Best Out of Experts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Choi, B. C. K., Liping, L., Yaogui, L., et al. 2016. Bridging the gap between science and policy: an international survey of scientists and policy-makers in China and Canada. Implementation Science, 11, 16. doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0377-7
CRCA. 2018. Cooperative Research Centres Association. Available from http://crca.asn.au/about -the-crc-association/about-crcs/ (accessed 9 February 2018).
Daniels, R. J., Spector, P. M. & Goetz, R. 2014. Fault lines in the compact: higher education and the public interest in the United States. In Weber, L. E. & Duderstadt, J. J., editors, Preparing the World’s Research Universities to Respond to an Era of Challenges and Change (pp. 127–140). Glion Colloquium Series No 8. Geneva: ECONOMICA.
Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. 2010. Ahead of the Game: Blueprint for the Reform of Australian Government Administration. Canberra: Author.
Dilling, L. & Lemos, M. C. 2011. Creating usable science: opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy. Global Environmental Change, 21, 680–689. doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.006
French, S. 2012. Expert judgment, meta-analysis and participatory risk analysis. Decision Analysis, 9, 119–127.
Gibbons, P., Zammit, C., Youngentob, K., et al. 2008. Some practical suggestions for improving engagement between researchers and policy-makers in natural resource management. Ecological Management & Restoration, 9, 182–186. doi:10.1111/j.1442-8903.2008.00416.x
Greenhalgh, T. & Fahy, N. 2015. Research impact in the community-based health sciences: an analysis of 162 case studies from the 2014 UK Research Excellence Framework. BMC Medicine, 13, 232. doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0467-4
Gregory, R., Failing, L., Harstone, M., et al. 2012. Structured Decision Making. A Practical Guide to Environmental Management Choices. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Gregory, J., Hartz-Karp, J. & Watson, R. 2008. Using deliberative techniques to engage the community in policy development. Australia and New Zealand Health Policy, 5, Art. 16. doi:10.1186/1743-8462-5-16
Krinitzsky, E. L. 1993. Earthquake probability in engineering – Part 1: the use and misuse of expert opinion. The Third Richard H. Jahns Distinguished Lecture in Engineering Geology. Engineering Geology, 33, 257–288. doi:10.1016/0013-7952(93)90030-G
Kogan, M., Henkel, M. & Hanney, S. 2006. Higher Education Dynamics, Volume 11. Government and Research. Thirty Years of Evolution (2nd ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.
Lavis, J. N., Boyko, J. A., Oxman, A. D., et al. 2009b. SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (STP) 14: organising and using policy dialogues to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Research Policy and Systems, 7(Suppl 1), S14. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S14
Lavis, J. N., Permanand, G., Oxman, A. D., et al. 2009a. SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (STP) 13: preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Research Policy and Systems, 7(Suppl 1), S13. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S13
Leibbrandt, A., Rossiter, A., Hester, S., et al. 2018. Testing compliance-based inspection protocols. CEBRA final report for project 1404C. The Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis, the University of Melbourne.
Martin, T. G., Burgman, M. A., Fidler, F., et al. 2012. Eliciting expert knowledge in conservation science. Conservation Biology, 26, 29–38. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01806.x
Masset, E., Gaarder, M., Beynon, P., et al. 2013. What is the impact of a policy brief? Results of an experiment in research dissemination. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 5, 50–63. doi:10.1080/19439342.2012.759257
Meagher, L. & Lyall, C. 2013. The invisible made visible: using impact evaluations to illuminate and inform the role of knowledge intermediaries. Evidence & Policy, 9, 409–418. doi:10.1332/174426413X14818994998468
Nichols, J. D., Johnson, F. A., Williams, B. K., et al. 2015. On formally integrating science and policy: walking the walk. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52, 539–543. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12406
O’Brien, M. 2000. Making Better Environmental Decisions: An Alternative to Risk Assessment. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Rajic, A., Young, I. & McEwen, S. A. 2013. Improving the utilization of research knowledge in agri-food public health: a mixed-method review of knowledge translation and transfer. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, 10, 397–412. doi:10.1089/fpd.2012.1349
Robinson, A., Burgman, M. A. & Cannon, R. 2011. Allocating surveillance resources to reduce ecological invasions: maximizing detections and information about the threat. Ecological Applications, 21, 1410–1417. doi:10.1890/10-0195.1
Robinson, A., Bell, J., Woolcott, B., et al. 2012. AQIS Quarantine Operations Risk Return ACERA 1001 Study J: Imported Plant-Product Pathways. Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis, University of Melbourne, Project 1001 J.
Rossiter, A. & Hester, S. 2017. Designing biosecurity inspection regimes to account for stakeholder incentives: an inspection game approach. Economic Record, 93(301), 277–301. doi:10.1111/1475/4932.12315
Rossiter, A., Hester, S., Aston, C., et al. 2015. Incentives for Importer Choices. Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis, University of Melbourne, Project 1304C, Final Report 1: Overview.
Slovic, P. 1999. Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 19, 689–701. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00439.x
Sutherland, W. J., Spiegelhalter, D. & Burgman, M. A. 2013Policy: twenty tips for interpreting scientific claims. Nature, 503, 335–337. doi:10.1038/503335a
Van Kerkhoff, L. E. & Lebel, L. 2015. Coproductive capacities: rethinking science–governance relations in a diverse world. Ecology and Society, 20, 14. doi.org/10.5751/ES-07188–200114
Ward, V, House, A. & Hamer, S. 2009. Knowledge brokering: the missing link in the evidence to action chain? Evidence & Policy, 5, 267–279. doi:10.1332/174426409X463811
Wiley, S. L. 2014. Doing broader impacts? The National Science Foundation (NSF) broader impacts criterion and communication-based activities. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 13734. Available from https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/13734 (accessed 16 August 2018).
Wintle, B., Mascaro, M., Fidler, F., et al. 2012. The intelligence game: assessing Delphi groups and structured question formats. In Corkill, J., Coole, M. & Valli, C., editors, Proceedings of the 5th Australian Security and Intelligence Conference (pp. 14–26). Perth: Security Research Institute, Edith Cowan University.
Young, J. C., Waylen, K. A., Sarkki, S., et al. 2014. Improving the science–policy dialogue to meet the challenges of biodiversity conservation: having conversations rather than talking at one another. Biodiversity Conservation, 23, 387–404. doi:10.1007/s10531-013-0607-0