Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:34:04.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 28 - CT in the ED: Special Considerations

from Part III - Computed Tomography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2017

J. Christian Fox
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crownover, BK, Bepko, JL: Appropriate and safe use of diagnostic imaging. Am Fam Physician 2013;87(7):494501.Google Scholar
Tublin, ME, Murphy, ME, Tessler, FN: Current concepts in contrast media-induced nephropathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171(4):933–9.Google Scholar
Pannu, N, Wiebe, N, Tonelli, M: Alberta Kidney Disease Network. Prophylaxis strategies for contrast-induced nephropathy. JAMA 2006;295(23):2765–79.Google Scholar
Gruberg, L, Mehran, R, Dangas, G, et al.: Acute renal failure requiring dialysis after percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Off J Soc Card Angiogr Interv 2001;52(4):409–16.Google Scholar
McCullough, PA, Wolyn, R, Rocher, LL, et al.: Acute renal failure after coronary intervention: incidence, risk factors, and relationship to mortality. Am J Med 1997;103(5):368–75.Google Scholar
Hoste, EAJ, Doom, S, De Waele, J, et al.: Epidemiology of contrast-associated acute kidney injury in ICU patients: a retrospective cohort analysis. Intensive Care Med 2011;37(12):1921–31.Google Scholar
Morcos, SK, Thomsen, HS, Webb, JA: Contrast-media-induced nephrotoxicity: a consensus report. Contrast Media Safety Committee, European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR). Eur Radiol 1999;9(8):1602–13.Google Scholar
Jakobsen, JA, Lundby, B, Kristoffersen, DT, et al.: Evaluation of renal function with delayed CT after injection of nonionic monomeric and dimeric contrast media in healthy volunteers. Radiology 1992;182(2):419–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cochran, ST, Wong, WS, Roe, DJ: Predicting angiography-induced acute renal function impairment: clinical risk model. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983;141(5):1027–33.Google Scholar
De Freitas do Carmo, LP, Macedo, E: Contrast-induced nephropathy: attributable incidence and potential harm. Crit Care Lond Engl 2012;16(3):127.Google Scholar
Gleeson, TG, Bulugahapitiya, S: Contrast-induced nephropathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183(6):1673–89.Google Scholar
Mitchell, AM, Jones, AE, Tumlin, JA, Kline, JA: Incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy after contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the outpatient setting. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;5(1):49.Google Scholar
Parfrey, PS, Griffiths, SM, Barrett, BJ, et al.: Contrast material-induced renal failure in patients with diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, or both. A prospective controlled study. N Engl J Med 1989;320(3):143–9.Google Scholar
Rudnick, MR, Goldfarb, S, Wexler, L, et al.: Nephrotoxicity of ionic and nonionic contrast media in 1196 patients: a randomized trial. The Iohexol Cooperative Study. Kidney Int 1995;47(1):254–61.Google Scholar
Traub, SJ, Kellum, JA, Tang, A, et al.: Risk factors for radiocontrast nephropathy after emergency department contrast-enhanced computerized tomography. Acad Emerg Med 2013;20(1):40–5.Google Scholar
Atwell, TD, Lteif, AN, Brown, DL, et al.: Neonatal thyroid function after administration of IV iodinated contrast agent to 21 pregnant patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191(1):268–71.Google Scholar
Webb, JAW, Thomsen, HS, Morcos, SK: Members of Contrast Media Safety Committee of European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR). The use of iodinated and gadolinium contrast media during pregnancy and lactation. Eur Radiol 2005;15(6):1234–40.Google Scholar
American College of Radiology: Manual on contrast media, version 10. 2015. Available at: www.acr.org/~/media/37D84428BF1D4E1B9A3A2918DA9E27A3.pdfGoogle Scholar
ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice: ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 299, September 2004 (replaces No. 158, September 1995). Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104(3):647–51.Google Scholar
Bettmann, MA: Frequently asked questions: iodinated contrast agents. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc 2004;24 Suppl 1:S310.Google Scholar
McCarthy, CS, Becker, JA: Multiple myeloma and contrast media. Radiology 1992;183(2):519–21.Google Scholar
Pahade, JK, LeBedis, CA, Raptopoulos, VD, et al.: Incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing contrast-enhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196(5):1094–101.Google Scholar
Bailey, CJ, Wilcock, C, Day, C: Effect of metformin on glucose metabolism in the splanchnic bed. Br J Pharmacol 1992;105(4):1009–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sirtori, CR, Pasik, C: Re-evaluation of a biguanide, metformin: mechanism of action and tolerability. Pharmacol Res Off J Ital Pharmacol Soc 1994;30(3):187228.Google Scholar
Barrett, BJ, Carlisle, EJ: Metaanalysis of the relative nephrotoxicity of high- and low-osmolality iodinated contrast media. Radiology 1993;188(1):171–8.Google Scholar
Briguori, C, Airoldi, F, D’Andrea, D, et al.: Renal insufficiency following contrast media administration trial (REMEDIAL): a randomized comparison of 3 preventive strategies. Circulation 2007;115(10):1211–7.Google Scholar
Ludwig, U, Riedel, MK, Backes, M, et al.: MESNA (sodium 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate) for prevention of contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity – controlled trial. Clin Nephrol 2011;75(4):302–8.Google Scholar
Ellis, JH, Cohan, RH: Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: an overview. Radiol Clin North Am 2009;47(5):801–11.Google Scholar
Trivedi, HS, Moore, H, Nasr, S, et al.: A randomized prospective trial to assess the role of saline hydration on the development of contrast nephrotoxicity. Nephron Clin Pract 2003;93(1):C2934.Google Scholar
From, AM, Bartholmai, BJ, Williams, AW, et al.: Sodium bicarbonate is associated with an increased incidence of contrast nephropathy: a retrospective cohort study of 7977 patients at Mayo Clinic. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3(1):10–8.Google Scholar
Gomes, VO, Lasevitch, R, Lima, VC, et al.: Hydration with sodium bicarbonate does not prevent contrast nephropathy: a multicenter clinical trial. Arq Bras Cardiol 2012;99(6):1129–34.Google Scholar
Merten, GJ, Burgess, WP, Gray, LV, et al.: Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy with sodium bicarbonate: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004;291(19):2328–34.Google Scholar
Adolph, E, Holdt-Lehmann, B, Chatterjee, T, et al.: Renal insufficiency following radiocontrast exposure trial (REINFORCE): a randomized comparison of sodium bicarbonate versus sodium chloride hydration for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy. Coron Artery Dis 2008;19(6):413–9.Google Scholar
Mueller, C, Buerkle, G, Buettner, HJ, et al.: Prevention of contrast media-associated nephropathy: randomized comparison of 2 hydration regimens in 1620 patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. Arch Intern Med 2002;162(3):329–36.Google Scholar
Weisbord, SD, Palevsky, PM: Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy with volume expansion. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3(1):273–80.Google Scholar
Stacul, F, van der Molen, AJ, Reimer, P, et al.: Contrast induced nephropathy: updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines. Eur Radiol 2011;21(12):2527–41.Google Scholar
Tepel, M, van der Giet, M, Schwarzfeld, C, et al.: Prevention of radiographic-contrast-agent-induced reductions in renal function by acetylcysteine. N Engl J Med 2000;343(3):180–4.Google Scholar
Bagshaw, SM, Ghali, WA: Acetylcysteine for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy after intravascular angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2004;2:38.Google Scholar
Traub, SJ, Mitchell, AM, Jones, AE, et al.: N-acetylcysteine plus intravenous fluids versus intravenous fluids alone to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy in emergency computed tomography. Ann Emerg Med 2013;62(5):511520.e25.Google Scholar
Cruz, DN, Perazella, MA, Ronco, C: The role of extracorporeal blood purification therapies in the prevention of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy. Int J Artif Organs 2008;31(6):515–24.Google Scholar
Cruz, DN, Goh, CY, Marenzi, G, et al.: Renal replacement therapies for prevention of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy: a systematic review. Am J Med 2012;125(1):6678.e3.Google Scholar
Morcos, SK, Thomsen, HS, Webb, JA: Contrast Media Safety Committee of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Prevention of generalized reactions to contrast media: a consensus report and guidelines. Eur Radiol 2001;11(9):1720–8.Google Scholar
Dewachter, P, Laroche, D, Mouton-Faivre, C, et al.: Immediate reactions following iodinated contrast media injection: a study of 38 cases. Eur J Radiol 2011;77(3):495501.Google Scholar
Brockow, K: Immediate and delayed reactions to radiocontrast media: is there an allergic mechanism? Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2009;29(3):453–68.Google Scholar
Caro, JJ, Trindade, E, McGregor, M: The risks of death and of severe nonfatal reactions with high- vs low-osmolality contrast media: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;156(4):825–32.Google Scholar
Katayama, H, Yamaguchi, K, Kozuka, T, et al.: Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology 1990;175(3):621–8.Google Scholar
Nguyen, CP, Goodman, LH: Fetal risk in diagnostic radiology. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2012;33(1):410.Google Scholar
Goldberg-Stein, SA, Liu, B, Hahn, PF, Lee, SI: Radiation dose management: part 2, estimating fetal radiation risk from CT during pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198(4):W352–6.Google Scholar
Masselli, G, Derchi, L, McHugo, J, et al.: Acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnancy: ESUR recommendations. Eur Radiol 2013;23(12):3485–500.Google Scholar
Sadro, C, Bernstein, MP, Kanal, KM: Imaging of trauma: part 2, abdominal trauma and pregnancy–a radiologist’s guide to doing what is best for the mother and baby. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199(6):1207–19.Google Scholar
Miglioretti, DL, Johnson, E, Williams, A, et al.: The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 2013;167(8):700–7.Google Scholar
Journy, N, Ancelet, S, Rehel, J-L, et al.: Predicted cancer risks induced by computed tomography examinations during childhood, by a quantitative risk assessment approach. Radiat Environ Biophys 2014;53(1):3954.Google Scholar
Winkler, NT: ALARA concept – now a requirement. Radiol Technol 1980;51(4):525.Google Scholar
Lyttle, MD, Crowe, L, Oakley, E, et al.: Comparing CATCH, CHALICE and PECARN clinical decision rules for paediatric head injuries. Emerg Med J 2012;29(10):785–94.Google Scholar
Kuppermann, N, Holmes, JF, Dayan, PS, et al.: Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2009;374(9696):1160–70.Google Scholar
Garcia, M, Taylor, G, Babcock, L, et al.: Computed tomography with intravenous contrast alone: the role of intra-abdominal fat on the ability to visualize the normal appendix in children. Acad Emerg Med 2013;20(8):795800.Google Scholar
Morton, RP, Reynolds, RM, Ramakrishna, R, et al.: Low-dose head computed tomography in children: a single institutional experience in pediatric radiation risk reduction: clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2013;12(4):406–10.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×