Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:38:42.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Theology

from PART IV - PHYSICS AND METAPHYSICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Jaap Mansfeld
Edited by
Keimpe Algra ,
Jonathan Barnes ,
Jaap Mansfeld  and
Malcolm Schofield
Keimpe Algra
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Jonathan Barnes
Affiliation:
Université de Genève
Jaap Mansfeld
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Malcolm Schofield
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Philosophical theology

Though theology without some form of religion to prompt it would be an odd phenomenon, it is by no means the same thing as religion. Theology, or at least philosophical theology, is a rational enterprise or at any rate an attempt to rationalize the irrational. Rationalist forms of reflection concerning the gods, or the divine, are part of Greek philosophy from its very beginning. On the one hand, the primary principle or principles were often said to be divine or provided with divine attributes, while on the other traditional views of the gods were criticized and other proposals formulated. But the first philosopher to elevate theology (at least in principle) to the status of a part of philosophy was Aristotle, who at Metaph. E 1.1026a19 affirms that there are ‘three theoretical disciplines: mathematics, physics, theology’. Before Aristotle, Plato had argued that those who write about the gods should follow certain ‘models’ (Rep. 379a6). According to this prescription, a god is good and so not the cause of evil but only of what is good, and he does not change but always remains the same. The sharp contrast with the gods of traditional Greek religion, who assume different shapes at will and may not only favour human beings but also deceive and harm them, is very deliberate.

Divinities which conform to this ideal play a decisive part in Plato's and Aristotle's cosmologies. According to Plato's Timaeus we live in the best of all possible worlds because it has been constructed by a Divine Craftsman and his help-mates.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy , pp. 452 - 478
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babut, D. (1974) La Religion des Philosophes Grecs, de Thales aux Stoiciens (Paris).Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1989a) ‘The size of the sun in antiquity’, ACD 25.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (1994a) ‘What did Pyrrho think about “the nature of the divine and the good”?’, Phronesis 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyancé, P. (1962) ‘Les preuves stoïciennes de l'existence des dieux d'après Cicéron’, Hermes 90.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1994d) ‘Did Diogenes of Babylon invent the ontological argument?’, in Brunschwig, (1994a).Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1982b) ‘Gods and heaps’, in Schofield, & Nussbaum, (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, D. (1986) ‘The cults of Epicurus’, CErc 16.Google Scholar
Couissin, P. (1941) ‘Les sorites de Carnéade contre le polythéisme’, REG 54.Google Scholar
Daiber, H. (1992) ‘The Meteorology of Theophrastus in Syriac and Arabic translation’, in Fortenbaugh, & Gutas, (1992).Google Scholar
Decleva Caizzi, F., ed. (1981a) Pirrone: Testimonianze, Elenchos, 5 (Naples).Google Scholar
Diels, H., ed. (1916/17) Philodemos über die Götter, Erstes und drittes Buch, Abh. der königlich Preussischen Akad. der Wiss. 1915.7/1916.4 and 6, philos.-hist. Klasse (Berlin).Google Scholar
Dionigi, I. (1976) ‘Lucr. 6, 1198–1203 e P. Oxy. 215 col. 17–24: L'epicureismo e la venerazione degli dei’, SIFC 48.Google Scholar
Döring, K. (1978) ‘Antike Theorien über die staatspolitische Notwendigkeit der Götterfurcht’, A & A 24.Google Scholar
Dragona-Monachou, M. (1976) The Stoic Arguments for the Existence and the Providence of the Gods (Athens).Google Scholar
Dumont, J.-P. (1982) ‘Diogène de Babylone et la preuve ontologique’, RPh 107.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (1992a) ‘Orthodoxie und Anpassung. Philodem, ein Panaitis des Kepos?’, MH 49.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (1993) ‘Philologia medicans. Wie die Epikureer die Texte ihres Meisters lasen’, in Kullmann, W. & Althoff, J., edd., Vermittlung und Tradierung von Wissen in der griechischen Kultur (Tübingen).Google Scholar
Fahr, W. (1969) “θEOYσ NOMIZEIN”, Zum Problem der Anfänge des Atheismus bei den Griechen, Spudasmata 26 (Hildesheim/New York).Google Scholar
Festugière, A.-J. (1949) La révélation d'Hermès Trismégiste, II: Le Dieu cosmique (Paris, later repr.).Google Scholar
Gercke, A., ed. (1885) Chrysippea (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1995) The Sceptics (London).Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. (1974) ‘Die Kritik der stoischen Theologie im PHerc. 1428’, CErc 4.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. (1975) ‘Two doxographical notes: Democritus and Prodicus on religion’, HSPh 79.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1985) Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism (Oxford).Google Scholar
Kattenbusch, F. (1930) ‘Die Entstehung einer christlichen Theologie. Zur Geschichte der Ausdrücke θ∊oλoγια, θ∊oλoγ∊ĩν, θ∊oλóγoς’, Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche N. F. 11.Google Scholar
Kleve, K. (1979) ‘The Epicurean isonomia and its sceptical refutation’, SO 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, F. A. (1974) Geschichte des Materialismus und Kritik seiner Bedeutung in der Gegenwart, Bd. 1: Geschichte des Materialismus bis auf Kant (Iserlohn 1866, 11 1921; repr. Frankfurt A. M. 1974 with introd. by Schmidt, A.).Google Scholar
Lemke, D. (1973) Die Theologie Epikurs: Versuch einer Rekonstruktion, Zetemata 57 (Munich).Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1975–6) ‘Heraclitus and Stoicism’, Philosophia 5/6 ; repr. in Long, (1996).Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1990) ‘Scepticism about Gods in Hellenistic philosophy’, in Griffith, M. & Mastronarde, D. J., edd., Cabinet of the Muses, Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer (Atlanta).Google Scholar
Long, A. A. & Sedley, D. N., edd. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols.: i. Translations of the principal sources with philosophical commentary; ii. Greek and Latin texts with notes and bibliography (Cambridge, various reprints).Google Scholar
Longo Auricchio, F., ed. (1988) Ermarco: Frammenti, La scuola di Epicuro 6 (Naples).Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1979) ‘Providence and the destruction of the universe in early Stoic thought’, in Vermaseren, M. J., ed., Studies in Hellenistic Religions, EPRO 78 (Leiden) ; repr. in Mansfeld, (1989b) study 1.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1981) ‘Protagoras on epistemological obstacles and persons’, in Kerferd, G. B., ed., The Sophists and their Legacy, Proceedings of the Fourth International Colloquium on Ancient Philosophy, Hermes Einzelschr. 44 (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1983b) ‘Techne: a new fragment of Chrysippus’, GRBS 24 ; repr. in Mansfeld, (1989b) study III.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1990a) ‘Doxography and dialectic: The Sitz im Leben of the “Placita”’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW 11 36.4 (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1992b) ‘A Theophrastean excursus on God and nature and its aftermath in Hellenistic thought’, Phronesis 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1992c) ‘Physikai doxai and problemata physika from Aristotle to Aëtius (and beyond)’, in Fortenbaugh, & Gutas, (1992).Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1993) ‘Aspects of Epicurean theology’, Mnemosyne 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1994a) ‘Epicurus peripateticus’, in Alberti, A., ed., Realtà e ragione, Studi di filosofia antica (Florence).Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (1984) ‘P.Oxy. 215 and Epicurean religious θ∊ωρια’, in Atti del XVII Congresso internazionale di papirologia, vol. II (Naples).Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (1989) ‘The atheism of Epicurus’, GRBS 30.Google Scholar
Obbink, D., ed. (1996) Philodemus On Piety, Part 1: Critical Text with Commentary (Oxford).Google Scholar
Pépin, J. (1976) Mythe et allégorie. Les origines grecques et les contestations judéo-chrétiennes, 2nd edn (Paris).Google Scholar
Romeo, C. (1979) ‘Demetrio Lacone sulla grandezza del sole (PHerc. 1013)’, CErc 9.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. (1992) ‘The language of excellence in Plato's Timaeus and later Platonism’, in Gersh, S. & Kannengiesser, C., eds., Platonism in Late Antiquity (Notre Dame).Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. (1996b) ‘Atheists in Aëtius. Text, translation and comments on De placitis 1.7.1–10’, Mnemosyne IV.59.Google Scholar
Sandbach, F. H. (1985) Aristotle and the Stoics, PCPhS suppl. vol. 10 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Schian, R. (1973) Untersuchungen über das ‘argumentum e consensu omnium’, Spudasmata 28 (Hildesheim).Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1980b) ‘Preconception, argument and god’, in Schofield, et al. (1980a).Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1983) ‘The syllogisms of Zeno of Citium’, Phronesis 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeke, G. (1949) Kleanthes van Assos (Brussels).Google Scholar
Winiarczyk, M., ed. (1981) Diagorae Melii et Theodori Cyrenaei reliquiae, Bibl. Teubneriana (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Winiarczyk, M. (1984) ‘Wer galt im Altertum als Atheist?’, Philologus 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winiarczyk, M. (1992) ‘Wer galt im Altertum als Atheist? 2. Teil’, Philologus 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, P. G. (1989) ‘Star gods in Philodemus, PHerc. 152/157’, CErc 19.Google Scholar
Zanker, G. (1981) ‘Enargeia in the ancient criticism of poetry’, RhM 124.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. (& Wellmann, E., ed.) (1909) Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, III.1: Die nacharistotelische Philosophie, erste Hälfte (Leipzig; 5 1923 = Darmstadt 6 1963).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×