Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T16:06:29.781Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

29 - The Emotion of Interest at Work

from Part V - Discrete Emotions at Work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2020

By
Cynthia D. Fisher
Edited by
Liu-Qin Yang ,
Russell Cropanzano ,
Catherine S. Daus  and
Vicente Martínez-Tur
Liu-Qin Yang
Affiliation:
Portland State University
Russell Cropanzano
Affiliation:
University of Colorado
Catherine S. Daus
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
Vicente Martínez-Tur
Affiliation:
Universitat de València, Spain
Get access

Summary

This chapter is about the emotion of interest as it may be experienced in the workplace. Interest has been described as “positive, focused, directed arousal, which prompts approach and engagement with the task” (Ainley, 2007, p. 153). Izard (1991, p. 100) describes the subjective experience of interest as “the feeling of being engaged, caught up, fascinated, or curious … wanting to investigate, become involved, or expand the self by incorporating new information and having new experiences with the person or object that has stimulated the interest. In intense interest or excitement, the person feels animated and enlivened.”

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Workplace Affect , pp. 389 - 401
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainley, M. (2007). Being and feeling interested: Transient state, mood, and disposition. In Schutz, P. A. & Pekrun, R (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 147–163). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ainley, M. (2017). Interest: Knowns, unknowns, and basic processes. In O’Keefe, P. A. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (Eds.), The science of interest (pp. 3–24). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.Google Scholar
Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545–561, doi:10.1037//0022-0663.94.3.545Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950–967, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.950Google Scholar
Barsade, S. G., Brief, A. P., & Spataro, S. E. (2003). The affective revolution in organizational behavior: The emergence of a paradigm. In Greenberg, J (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (2nd edition, pp. 3–52). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connelly, S., & Torrence, B. S. (2018). The relevance of discrete emotional experiences for human resource management: Connecting positive and negative emotions to HRM. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 36, 1–49, doi:10.1108/S0742-730120180000036001Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Khosla, S., & Nakamura, J. (2017). Flow at work. In Oades, L. G., Steger, M. F., Fave., A. D., & Passmore, J (Eds.), Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of positivity and strengths-based approaches at work (pp. 99–109). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Deci, E., Olafsen, A., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19–43, doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dierdorff, E. C., & Jensen, J. M. (2018). Crafting in context: Exploring when job crafting is dysfunctional for performance effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(5), 463–477, doi:10.1037/apl0000295Google Scholar
Durik, A. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2007). Different strokes for different folks: How individual interest moderates the effects of situational factors on task interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 597–610, doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.597Google Scholar
Durik, A. M., Lindeman, M. H., & Coley, S. L. (2017). The power within: How individual interest promotes domain-relevant task engagement. In O’Keefe, P. A. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (Eds.), The science of interest (pp. 125–148). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egloff, B., Schmukle, S. C., Burns, L. R., Kohlmann, C., & Hock, M. (2003). Facets of dynamic positive affect: Differentiating joy, interest, and activation in the positive and negative affect schedule. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 528–540, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.528Google Scholar
Ely, R., Ainley, M., & Pearce, J. (2013). More than enjoyment: Identifying the positive affect component of interest that supports student engagement and achievement. Middle Grades Research Journal, 8(1), 13–32.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. D. (2018). Boredom at work: What, why, and what then? In Lindebaum, D, Geddes, D, & Jordan, P. J. (Eds.), Social functions of emotion and talking about emotion at work (pp. 68–102). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. D., & Noble, C. S. (2004). A within-person examination of correlates of performance and emotions while working. Human Performance, 17(2), 145–168, doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1702_2Google Scholar
Fisher, C. D., & To, M. L. (2012). Using experience sampling methodology in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 865–877, doi:10.1002/job.1803Google Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300–319, doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300Google Scholar
Fredrickson, B., & Joiner, T. (2018). Reflections on positive emotions and upward spirals. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 194–199.Google Scholar
Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fryer, L. K., & Ainley, M. (2019). Supporting interest in a study domain: A longitudinal test of the interplay between interest, utility-value, and competence beliefs. Learning and Instruction, 60, 252–262, doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulmer, S. M., & Frijters, J. C. (2011). Motivation during an excessively challenging reading task: The buffering role of relative topic interest. Journal of Experimental Education, 79(2), 185–208, doi:10.1080/00220973.2010.481503Google Scholar
Green-Demers, I., Pelletier, L. G., Stewart, D. G., & Gushue, N. R. (1998). Coping with the less interesting aspects of training: Toward a model of interest and motivation enhancement in individual sports. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20(4), 251–261, doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2004_2Google Scholar
Griffin, R. W. (1983). Objective and social sources of information in task redesign: A field experiment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2), 184–200, doi:10.2307/2392617Google Scholar
Gruber, M., Gelman, B., & Ranganath, C. (2014). States of curiosity modulate hippocampus-dependent learning via the dopaminergic circuit. Neuron, 84(2), 486–496, doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.060Google Scholar
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 105–122, doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, J. H., Ness, A. M., & Mecca, J. (2017). Outside the box: Epistemic curiosity as a predictor of creative problem solving and creative performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 230–237, doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.004Google Scholar
Harrison, S., Sluss, D., & Ashforth, B (2011). Curiosity adapted the cat: The role of trait curiosity in newcomer adaptation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 211–220, doi:10.1037/a0021647Google Scholar
Harter, J. K., & Stone, A. A. (2012). Engaging and disengaging work conditions, momentary experiences and cortisol response. Motivation and Emotion, 36(2), 104–113, doi://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9231-zGoogle Scholar
Henn, J. (2010). Multimethod analysis of interest (doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/16784/Henn_Jeremy.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.Google Scholar
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127, doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4Google Scholar
Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of personalities and work environments (3rd edition). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Hu, X., & Kaplan, S. (2015). Is “feeling good” good enough? Differentiating discrete positive emotions at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 39–58, doi:10.1002/job.1941Google Scholar
Hulleman, C. S., Durik, A. M., Schweigert, S. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2008). Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 398–416, doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.398Google Scholar
Hulleman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 880–895, doi:10.1037/a0019506Google Scholar
Hulleman, C. S., Thoman, D. B., Dicke, A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2017). The promotion and development of interest: The importance of perceived values. In O’Keefe, P. A. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (Eds.), The science of interest (pp. 189–208). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingerick, M., & Rumsey, M. G. (2014). Taking the measure of work interests: Past, present, and future. Military Psychology, 26(3), 165–181, doi://dx.doi.org/10.1037/mil0000045Google Scholar
Izard, C. E. (1991). The psychology of emotions. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Jang, H. (2008). Supporting students’ motivation, engagement, and learning during an uninteresting activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 798–811, doi:10.1037/a0012841Google Scholar
Jepma, M., Verdonschot, R. G., van Steenbergen, H., Rombouts, S. A., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2012). Neural mechanisms underlying the induction and relief of perceptual curiosity. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 6(9), doi://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00005Google Scholar
Johnson, V. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2014). Making use of professional development: Employee interests and motivational goal orientations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(2), 99–108, doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2013.12.003Google Scholar
Kang, M. J., Hsu, M., Krajbich, I. M., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., Wang, J. T., & Camerer, C. F. (2009). The wick in the candle of learning: Epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory. Psychological Science, 20(8), 963–973, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02402.xGoogle Scholar
Katz, I., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2006). Interest as a motivational resource: Feedback and gender matter, but interest makes the difference. Social Psychology of Education, 9(1), 27–42, doi:10.1007/s11218-005-2863-7Google Scholar
Keltner, D., & Gross, J. J. (1999). Functional accounts of emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 13(5), 467–480, doi:10.1080/026999399379140Google Scholar
Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 383–409, doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00011-1Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lench, H. C., Bench, S. W., Darbor, K. E., & Moore, M. (2015). A functionalist manifesto: Goal-related emotions from an evolutionary perspective. Emotion Review, 7(1), 90–98, doi:10.1177/1754073914553001Google Scholar
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Patall, E. A., & Messersmith, E. E. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of situational interest. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 591–614, doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02080.xGoogle Scholar
Litman, J. A. (2008). Interest and deprivation factors of epistemic curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(7), 1585–1595, doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litman, J. A., & Silvia, P. J. (2006). The latent structure of trait curiosity: Evidence for interest and deprivation curiosity dimensions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86(3), 318–328, doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8603_07Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 75–98, doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75Google Scholar
Mäkikangas, A., Bakker, A. B., Aunola, K., & Demerouti, E. (2010). Job resources and flow at work: Modelling the relationship via latent growth curve and mixture model methodology. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3), 795–814, doi.org/10.1348/096317909X476333Google Scholar
Master, A., Butler, L. P., & Walton, G. M. (2017). How the subjective relationship between the self, others, and a task drives interest. In O’Keefe, P. A. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (Eds.), The science of interest (pp. 209–226). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.Google Scholar
Mussel, P. (2013). Introducing the construct curiosity for predicting job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(4), 453–472, doi:10.1002/job.1809Google Scholar
Nye, C. D., Su, R., Rounds, J., & Drasgow, F. (2017). Interest congruence and performance: Revisiting recent meta-analytic findings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 98, 138–151, doi://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.11.002Google Scholar
O’Keefe, P. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2017). The science of interest. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, P. A., Horberg, E. J., & Plante, I. (2017). The multifaceted role of interest in motivation and engagement. In O’Keefe, P. A. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (Eds.), The science of interest (pp. 49–67). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, P. A., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2014). The role of interest in optimizing performance and self-regulation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 70–78, doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.02.004Google Scholar
Ortony, A., & Turner, T. J. (1990). What’s basic about basic emotions? Psychological Review, 97(3), 315–331, doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.315Google Scholar
Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Patrick, J., Smy, V., Tombs, M., & Shelton, K. (2012). Being in one’s chosen job determines pre-training attitudes and training outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(2), 245–257, doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02027.xGoogle Scholar
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341, doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9Google Scholar
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., & Perry, R. P. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control-value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 531–549, doi:10.1037/a0019243Google Scholar
Pugh, K., & Bergin, D. (2006). Motivational influences on transfer. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 147–160, doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4103_2Google Scholar
Reio, T., & Wiswell, A. (2000). Field investigation of the relationship among adult curiosity, workplace learning, and job performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11(1), 5–30, doi:10.1002/1532-1096(200021)11:1<5::AID-HRDQ2>3.0.CO;2-AGoogle Scholar
Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In Sansone, C & Harackiewicz, J. M. (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 373–404). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2017). Interest development: Arousing situational interest affects the growth trajectory of individual interest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 175–184, doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.02.003Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Sackett, A. M., Meyvis, T., Nelson, L. D., Converse, B. A., & Sackett, A. L. (2010). You’re having fun when time flies: The hedonic consequences of subjective time progression. Psychological Science, 21(1), 111, doi:10.1177/0956797609354832Google Scholar
Salanova, M., Bakker, A., & Llorens, S. (2006). Flow at work: Evidence for an upward spiral of personal and organizational resources. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(1), 1–22, doi:10.1007/s10902-005-8854-8Google Scholar
Sansone, C., & Thoman, D. B. (2005). Interest as the missing motivator in self-regulation. European Psychologist, 10(3), 175–186.Google Scholar
Sansone, C., Weir, C., Harpster, L., & Morgan, C. (1992). Once a boring task always a boring task? Interest as a self-regulatory mechanism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 379–390, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.379Google Scholar
Schiefele, U. (2009). Situational and individual interest. In Wenzel, K. R. & Wigfield, A (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 197–222). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Senko, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2005). Achievement goals, task performance, and interest: Why perceived goal difficulty matters. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(12), 1739–1753, doi:10.1177/0146167205281128Google Scholar
Shin, J., & Grant, A. M. (2019). Bored by interest: Intrinsic motivation in one task can reduce performance on other tasks. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2), 415–436, doi:10.5465/amj.2017.0735Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J. (2001). Interest and interests: The psychology of constructive capriciousness. Review of General Psychology, 5(3), 270–290, doi:10.1037//1089-2680.5.3.270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvia, P. J. (2003). Self-efficacy and interest: Experimental studies of optimal incompetence. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62(2), 237–249, doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00013-1Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J. (2005). What is interesting? Exploring the appraisal structure of interest. Emotion, 5(1), 89–102, doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.89Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J. (2006). Exploring the psychology of interest. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: What we know and where we need to go. Psychological Bulletin, 137(3), 421–442, doi:10.1037/a0022777Google Scholar
Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 813–838, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813Google Scholar
Sucala, M. L., Stefan, S., Szentagotai-Tatar, A., & David, D. (2010). Time flies when you expect to have fun: An experimental investigation of the relationship between expectancies and the perception of time progression. Cognition, Brain, Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 231–241.Google Scholar
Sung, B., & Yih, J. (2016). Does interest broaden or narrow attentional scope? Cognition and Emotion, 30(8), 1485–1494, doi:10.1080/02699931.2015.1071241Google Scholar
Tanaka, A., & Murayama, K. (2014). Within-person analyses of situational interest and boredom: Interactions between task-specific perceptions and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 1122–1134, doi:10.1037/a0036659Google Scholar
Thoman, D. B., Sansone, C., Fraughton, T., & Pasupathi, M. (2012). How students socially evaluate interest: Peer responsiveness influences evaluation and maintenance of interest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(4), 254–265, doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.04.001Google Scholar
Thoman, D.B., Sansone, C., & Geerling, D. (2017). The dynamic nature of interest: Embedding interest within self-regulation. In O’Keefe, P. A. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (Eds.), The science of interest (pp. 27–47). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.Google Scholar
Thoman, D. B., Smith, J. L., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). The resource replenishment function of interest. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 592–599, doi:10.1177/1948550611402521Google Scholar
Tomkins, S. S. (1984). Affect theory. In Scherer, K. R. & Ekman, P (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 95–163). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Turner, S. A., & Silvia, P. J. (2006). Must interesting things be pleasant? A test of competing appraisal structures. Emotion, 6(4), 670–674, doi:10.1037/1528-3542.6.4.670Google Scholar
Ulrich, M., Keller, J., Hoenig, K., Waller, C., & Grön, G. (2014). Neural correlates of experimentally induced flow experiences. NeuroImage, 86, 194–202, doi://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.019Google Scholar
Van Tilburg, W., & Igou, E. (2017). Boredom begs to differ: Differentiation from other negative emotions. Emotion, 17(2), 309–322, doi:10.1037/emo0000233Google Scholar
Van Yperen, N. W. (2003). Task interest and actual performance: The moderating effects of assigned and adopted purpose goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1006Google Scholar
Wang, H., & Li, J. (2015). How trait curiosity influences psychological well-being and emotional exhaustion: The mediating role of personal initiative. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 135–140, doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.020Google Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063Google Scholar
Weiss, H. M., & Shaw, J. B. (1979). Social influences on judgments about tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24(1), 126–140, doi:10.1016/0030-5073(79)90020-5Google Scholar
Winslow, C. J., Hu, X., Kaplan, S. A., & Li, Y. (2017). Accentuate the positive: Which discrete positive emotions predict which work outcomes? The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 20(2), 74–89, doi:10.1037/mgr0000053Google Scholar
Wittmann, B. C., Bunzeck, N., Dolan, R. J., & Düzel, E. (2007). Anticipation of novelty recruits reward system and hippocampus while promoting recollection. NeuroImage, 38(1), 194–202, doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.038Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×