Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:07:36.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

90 - Screening: Antenatal

from Section 1 - Prevention and Screening

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2019

By
Rose Coates  and
Susan Ayers
Edited by
Carrie D. Llewellyn ,
Susan Ayers ,
Chris McManus ,
Stanton Newman ,
Keith J. Petrie ,
Tracey A. Revenson  and
John Weinman
Carrie D. Llewellyn
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Susan Ayers
Affiliation:
City, University of London
Chris McManus
Affiliation:
University College London
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
City, University of London
Keith J. Petrie
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Tracey A. Revenson
Affiliation:
City University of New York
John Weinman
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine , pp. 407 - 409
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asplin, N., Wessel, H., Marions, L., et al. (2012). Pregnant women’s experiences, needs and preferences regarding information about malformation detected by ultrasound scan. Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, 3, 73–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asplin, N., Wessel, H., Marions, L., et al. (2015). Maternal emotional wellbeing over time and attachment to the fetus when a malformation is detected. Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. 6, 191–195.Google Scholar
Biaggi, A., Conroy, S., Pawlby, S., et al. (2016). Identifying the women at risk of antenatal anxiety and depression: a systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 191, 62–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byatt, N., Moore Simas, T. A., Lundquist, R. S., et al. (2012). Strategies for improving perinatal depression treatment in North American outpatient obstetric settings. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 33(4), 143–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chew-Graham, C. A., Sharp, D., Chamberlain, E., et al. (2009). Disclosure of symptoms of postnatal depression, the perspectives of health professionals and women: a qualitative study. BMC Family Practice, 10, 7. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-7.Google Scholar
Dahl, H., Hvidman, L., Jorgensen, F. S., et al. (2011). Knowledge of prenatal screening and psychological management of test decisions. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 38: 152–157.Google Scholar
Dennis, C.-L. & Chung-Lee, L. 2006. Postpartum depression help-seeking barriers and maternal treatment preferences: a qualitative systematic review. Birth, 33(4), 323–331Google Scholar
Desgrées-Du-Loû, A., Brou, H., Djohanm, G., et al. (2009). Beneficial effects of offering prenatal HIV counselling and testing on developing a HIV preventive attitude among couples. Aids Behaviour. 13, 348.Google Scholar
El Den, S., O’Reilly, C. L. & Chen, T. F. (2015). A systematic review on the acceptability of perinatal depression screening. Journal of Affective Disorders, 188, 284–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Field, T. A., Diego, M., Hernandez-Reif, M., et al. (2010). Comorbid depression and anxiety effects on pregnancy and neonatal outcome. Infant Behavior and Development, 33, 23–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gavin, N. I., Gaynes, B. N., Lohr, K. N., et al. (2005). Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 106, 1071–1083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georgsson Ohman, S., Grunewald, C. & Waldenstrom, U. (2009). Perception of risk in relation to ultrasound screening for Down’s syndrome during pregnancy. Midwifery, 25, 264–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, J. M., Franck, L. & Michie, S. (2012). Assessing the psychological effects of prenatal screening tests for maternal and foetal conditions: a systematic review. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 30(3), 222–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewison, J. (2015). Psychological aspects of individualized choice and reproductive autonomy in prenatal screening. Bioethics, 29, 9–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaasen, A., Helbig, A., Malt, U. F., et al. (2010). Acute maternal social dysfunction, health perception and psychological distress after ultrasonographic detection of a fetal structural anomaly. BJOG. 117, 1127–1138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kingston, D. E., Biringer, A., McDonald, S. W., et al. (2015a). Preferences for mental health screening among pregnant women: a cross-sectional study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kingston, D. E., Biringer, A., Toosi, A., et al. (2015b). Disclosure during prenatal mental health screening. Journal of Affective Disorders, 186, 90–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lancet (2016, 10 February). Screening for perinatal depression: A missed opportunity [Editorial]. Lancet, 387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00265-8Google Scholar
Lou, S., Mikkelsen, L., Hvidman, L., et al. (2014). Does screening for Down’s syndrome cause anxiety in pregnant women? A systematic review. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 94(1), 15–27.Google Scholar
McCoyd, J. L. (2013). Preparation for prenatal decision-making: a baseline of knowledge and reflection in women participating in prenatal screening. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 34, 3–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milgrom, J., Gemmill, A. W., Bilszta, J. L., et al. (2008). Antenatal risk factors for postnatal depression: a large prospective study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 108, 147–157.Google Scholar
Muller, C. & Cameron, L. D. (2015). It’s complicated: factors predicting decisional conflict in prenatal diagnostic testing. Health Expectations, 19, 338–342.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2014). Antenatal and Postnatal Mental Health: Clinical Management and Service Guidance. Clinical Guideline 192. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.Google Scholar
O’Connor, T. G., Heron, J., Golding, J., et al. (2003). Maternal anxiety and behavioural/emotional problems in children: a test of a programming hypothesis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 1025–1036CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Public Health England. (2015) Evidence review criteria: national screening programmes. www.gov.uk/government/publications/evidence-review-criteria-national-screening-programmes.Google Scholar
van den Berg, M., Timmermans, D. R. M., Knol, D. L., et al. (2008). Understanding pregnant women’s decision making concerning prenatal screening. Health Psychology, 27, 430–437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viaux-Savelon, S., Dommergues, M., Rosenblum, O., et al. (2012). Prenatal ultrasound screening: false positive soft markers may alter maternal representations and mother-infant interaction. PLOS One. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030935.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2011). Community genetics services: report of a WHO Consultation on community genetics in low- and middle-income countries. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44532/1/9789241501149_eng.pdf.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2016). mhGAP Intervention Guide: Version 2.0 for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in non-specialized health settings. www.who.int/mental_health/mhgap/mhGAP_intervention_guide_02/en.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×