Baker, C. L. 1979. ‘Syntactic theory and the projection problem’, Linguistic Inquiry 10(4): 533–81.
Baker, M. 2008. ‘The macroparameter in a microparametric world’, in Biberauer, (ed.), pp. 351–74.
Berwick, R. 1985. The acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Biberauer, T. (ed.) 2008. The limits of syntactic variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Biberauer, T. (ed.) 2011. ‘In defence of lexico-centric parametric variation: Two 3rd factor-constrained case studies’, paper presented at the Workshop on Formal Grammar and Syntactic Variation: Rethinking Parameters, Madrid.
Biberauer, T., Holmberg, A. and Roberts, I. 2014. ‘A syntactic universal and its consequences’, Linguistic Inquiry 45(2): 169–225.
Biberauer, T., Holmberg, A., Roberts, I. and Sheehan, M. (eds.) 2010. Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory. Cambridge University Press.
Biberauer, T. and Richards, M. 2006. ‘True optionality: When the grammar doesn’t mind’, in Boeckx, C. (ed.), Minimalist essays. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 35–67.
Biberauer, T. and Roberts, I. 2005. ‘Changing EPP-parameters in the history of English: Accounting for variation and change’, English Language and Linguistics 9(1): 5–46.
Biberauer, T. and Roberts, I. 2008. ‘Cascading parameter changes: Internally driven change in Middle and Early Modern English’, in Eythórsson, Th. (ed.), Grammatical change and linguistic theory: The Rosendal papers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 79–113.
Biberauer, T. and Roberts, I. 2009. ‘The return of the subset principle’, in Crisma, and Longobardi, (eds.), pp. 58–74.
Biberauer, T. and Roberts, I. 2012. ‘Towards a parameter hierarchy for auxiliaries: Diachronic considerations’, in Chancharu, J., Hu, X. and Mitrović, M. (eds.), Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 6: 209–36.
Biberauer, T. and Roberts, I. 2014. ‘Conditional inversion and types of parametric change’, paper presented at the 40th Incontro di grammatica generativa, Trento.
Biberauer, T., Sheehan, M. and Newton, G. 2010. ‘Impossible changes and impossible borrowings: The Final-over-Final Constraint’, in Breitbarth, A., Lucas, C., Watts, S. and Willis, D. (eds.), Continuity and change in grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 35–60.
Biberauer, T. and Zeijlstra, H. 2011. ‘Negative concord in Afrikaans: Filling a typological gap’, Journal of Semantics 29(3): 345–71.
Biberauer, T. and Zeijlstra, H. 2012. ‘Negative changes: Three factors and the diachrony of Afrikaans negation’, in Galves, , Cyrino, , Sândalo, , Lopes, and Avelar, (eds.), pp. 237–63.
Borer, H. 1984. Parametric syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romance languages. Dordrecht: Foris.
Branigan, P. 2012. ‘Macroparameter learnability: An Algonquian case study’, unpublished MS, Memorial University, Newfoundland.
Brown, R. 1973. A first language: The early years. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brown, R. and Hanlon, C. 1970. ‘Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech’, in Hayes, J. (ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 11–53.
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 2000. ‘Minimalist inquiries: The framework’, in Martin, R., Michaels, D. and Uriagereka, J. (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press, pp. 89–156.
Chomsky, N. 2001. ‘Derivation by phase’, in Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press, pp. 1–53.
Chomsky, N. 2005. ‘Three factors in language design’, Linguistic Inquiry 36(1): 1–22.
Chomsky, N. 2007. ‘Approaching UG from below’, in Gärtner, H.-M. and Sauerland, U. (eds.), Interface + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s minimalism and the view from syntax and semantics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–29.
Chomsky, N. and Halle, M. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
Clark, A. and Lappin, S. 2011. Linguistic nativism and the Poverty of the Stimulus. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Clark, R. 1992. ‘The selection of syntactic knowledge’, Language Acquisition 2(2): 83–149.
Clark, R. and Roberts, I. 1993. ‘A computational model of language learnability and language change’, Linguistic Inquiry 24(2): 299–345.
Corblin, F., Déprez, V., de Swart, H. and Tovena, L. 2004. ‘Negative concord’, in Corblin, F. and de Swart, H. (eds.), Handbok of French semantics. Stanford, CA: CSLI, pp. 417–52.
Crisma, P. and Longobardi, G. (eds) 2009. Historical syntax and linguistic theory. Oxford University Press.
Davison, A. 2007. ‘Word order, parameters and the extended COMP projection’, in Bayer, J., Bhattacharya, T. and Hany Babu, M. Veettil Tharayil (eds.), Linguistic theory and South Asian languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 175–98.
Dell, F. 1981. ‘On the learnability of optional phonological rules’, Linguistic Inquiry 12(1): 31–7.
Denison, D. 1998. ‘Syntax’, in Romaine, S. (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English language, vol. IV: 1776–1997. Cambridge University Press, pp. 92–329.
Deterding, D., Ling Low, E. and Brown, A. 2003. English in Singapore: Research on grammar. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
Dresher, E. 1999. ‘Charting the learning path: Cues to parameter setting’, Linguistic Inquiry 30(1): 27–67.
Dresher, E. 2009. The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge University Press.
Dresher, E. 2013. ‘The arch not the stones: Universal Feature Theory without universal features’, paper presented at the Conference on Features in Phonology, Morphology, Syntax and Semantics: What Are They?, CASTL, University of Tromsø.
Dresher, E. and Kaye, J. 1990. ‘A computational learning model for Metrical Phonology’, Cognition 34(1): 137–95.
Dryer, M. 1992. ‘The Greenbergian word order correlations’, Language 68: 81–138.
Duguine, M. and Irurtzun, A. 2014. ‘From obligatory wh-movement to optional wh-in-situ in Labourdin Basque’, Language 90(1): e1–e30.
Evers, A. and van Kampen, J. 2008. ‘Parameter setting and input reduction’, in Biberauer, (ed.), pp. 483–515.
Fischer, O., van Kemenade, A., Koopman, W. and van der Wurff, W. 2000. The syntax of early English. Cambridge University Press.
Fisher, C. 2002. ‘The role of abstract syntactic knowledge in language acquisition: A reply to Tomasello (2000)’, Cognition 82: 259–78.
Fodor, J. D. 1998. ‘Unambiguous triggers’, Linguistic Inquiry 19(1): 1–36.
Fodor, J. D. and Sakas, W. 2004. ‘Evaluating models of parameter setting’, Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD 28). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 1–27.
Fontana, J. 1993. ‘Phrase structure and the syntax of clitics in the history of Spanish’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Frank, R. and Kapur, S. 1996. ‘On the use of triggers in parameter setting’, Linguistic Inquiry 27: 623–60.
Fukui, N. 1986. ‘A theory of category projection and its applications’, unpublished PhD thesis, MIT.
Fuß, E. and Trips, C. 2002. ‘Variation and change in Old and Middle English – on the validity of the double base hypothesis’, Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 4: 171–224.
Galves, C., Cyrino, S., Sândalo, F., Lopes, R. and Avelar, J. (eds.) 2012. Parameter theory and linguistic change. Oxford University Press.
Gentner, D. and Boroditsky, L. 2001. ‘Individuation, relational relativity and early word learning’, in Bowerman, M. and Levinson, S. (eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development. Cambridge University Press, pp. 215–56.
Giannakidou, A. 2000. ‘Negative … Concord?’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 457–523.
Gibson, E. and Wexler, K. 1994. ‘Triggers’, Linguistic Inquiry 25(3): 407–54.
Gold, E. M. 1967. ‘Language identication in the limit’, Information and Control 10: 447–74.
Goldin-Meadow, S., Butcher, C., Mylander, C. and Dodge, M. 1994. ‘Nouns and verbs in a self-styled gesture system: what’s in a name?’, Cognitive Psychology 27: 259–319.
Hale, M. and Reiss, C. 1998. ‘Formal and empirical arguments concerning phonological acquisition’, Linguistic Inquiry 29(4): 656–83.
Hale, M. and Reiss, C. 2003. ‘The subset principle in phonology: Why the tabula can’t be rasa’, Journal of Linguistics 39(2): 219–44.
Heycock, C. and Wallenberg, J. 2013. ‘How variational acquisition drives syntactic change: The loss of verb movement in Scandinavian’, Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 16(2/3): 127–57.
Holmberg, A. 2005. ‘Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish’, Linguistic Inquiry 36(4): 533–56.
Holmberg, A. 2010. ‘Null subject parameters’, in Biberauer, , Holmberg, , Roberts, and Sheehan, (eds.), pp. 88–112.
Ingham, R. and Larrivée, P. 2011. The evolution of negation: Beyond the Jespersen Cycle. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jäger, A. 2008. History of German negation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kayne, R. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Keenan, E. 1998. ‘The historical creation of reflexive pronouns in English’, unpublished MS, UCLA.
Keenan, E. 2002. ‘Explaining the creation of reflexive pronouns in English’, in Minkova, D. and Stockwell, R. (eds.), Studies in the history of English: A millennial perspective. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 325–55.
Keenan, E. 2009. ‘Linguistic theory and the historical creation of English reflexives’, in Crisma, and Longobardi, (eds.), pp. 17–40.
Koopman, H. 1984. The syntax of verbs: From verb movement rules in the Kru languages to Universal Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.
Kroch, A. 1989. ‘Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change’, Language Variation and Change 1(3): 199–244.
Kroch, A. 1994. ‘Morphosyntactic variation’, in Beals, K., Denton, J., Knippen, B., Meinar, L., Suzuki, H. and Zeinfeld, E. (eds.), Proceedings of the thirtieth annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 180–201.
Kroch, A. 2001. ‘Syntactic change’, in Baltin, M. and Collins, C. (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 629–739.
Kroch, A. and Taylor, A. 2000. ‘Verb–object order in early Middle English’, in Pintzuk, S., Tsoulas, G. and Warner, A. (eds.), Diachronic syntax: Models and mechanisms. Oxford University Press, pp. 132–63.
Ledgeway, A. 2012. From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic typology and change. Oxford University Press.
Liberman, M. and Sag, I. 1974. ‘Prosodic form and discourse function’, Chicago Linguistics Society 10: 416–27.
Lidz, J., Gleitman, H. and Gleitman, L. 2003. ‘Understanding how input matters: Verb learning and the footprint of universal grammar’, Cognition 87(3): 151–78.
Lidz, J. and Gleitman, L. 2004. ‘Argument structure and the child’s contribution to language learning’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(4): 157–61.
Lightfoot, D. W. 1979. Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge University Press.
Lightfoot, D. W. 1991. How to set parameters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lightfoot, D. W. 1999. The development of language: Acquisition, change and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lightfoot, D. W. 2006. How new languages emerge. Cambridge University Press.
Lightfoot, D. and Westergaard, M. 2007. ‘Language acquisition and language change: Interrelationships’, Language and Linguistics Compass 1(5): 396–416.
Longobardi, G. 2001. ‘Formal syntax, diachronic minimalism, and etymology: The history of French chez’, Linguistic Inquiry 32(2): 275–302.
MacSwan, J. 2000. ‘The architecture of the bilingual language faculty: Evidence from intrasentential code switching’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3(1): 37–54.
Marcus, G. 1993. ‘Negative evidence in language acquisition’, Cognition 46: 53–85.
Moerenhout, M. and van der Wurff, W. 2005. ‘Object–verb order in early sixteenth-century English prose: An exploratory study’, English Language and Linguistics 9(1): 83–114.
Newport, E., Gleitman, L. and Gleitman, H. 1977. ‘Mother, I’d rather do it myself: Some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style’, in Snow, C. and Ferguson, C. A. (eds.), Talking to children: Language input and acquistion. Cambridge University Press, pp. 109–49.
Niyogi, P. and Berwick, R. 1995. ‘The logical problem of language change’, A.I. Memo no. 1516, MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
Pinker, S. 1984. Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pintzuk, S. 1991. ‘Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Pintzuk, S. and Taylor, A. 2006. ‘The loss of OV order in the history of English’, in van Kemenade, A. and Los, B. (eds.), The handbook of the history of English. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 249–78.
Poletto, C. 1995. ‘The diachronic development of subject clitics in North-Eastern Italian dialects’, in Battye, A. and Roberts, I. (eds.), Clause structure and language change. Oxford University Press, pp. 295–324.
Richards, M. 2008. ‘Two kinds of variation in a minimalist system’, in Heck, F., Müller, G. and Trommer, J. (eds.), Varieties of competition: Linguistische Arbeitsberichte. Leipzig University, pp. 133–62.
Rizzi, L. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
Rizzi, L. 1986. ‘Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro’, Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–57.
Roberts, I. 2007. Diachronic syntax. Oxford University Press.
Roberts, I. 2010. ‘A deletion analysis of null subjects’, in Biberauer, , Holmberg, , Roberts, and Sheehan, (eds.), pp. 58–87.
Roberts, I. 2012. ‘Macroparameters and minimalism: A programme for comparative research’, in Galves, , Cyrino, , Sândalo, , Lopes, and Avelar, (eds.), pp. 320–35.
Roberts, I. and Roussou, A. 2003. Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalisation. Cambridge University Press.
Rögnvaldsson, E. 1996. ‘Word order variation in the VP in Old Icelandic’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 58: 55–86.
Sakas, W. and Fodor, J. D. 2012. ‘Disambiguating syntactic triggers’, Language Acquisition 19: 83–143.
Santorini, B. 1989. ‘The generalization of the verb-second constraint in the history of Yiddish’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Santorini, B. 1992. ‘Variation and change in Yiddish subordinate clause word order’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10: 595–640.
Speyer, A. 2008. ‘On the interaction of prosody and syntax in the history of English, with a few remarks on German’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Taylor, A. 1990. ‘Clitics and configurationality in Ancient Greek’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Taylor, A. and Pintzuk, S. 2012. ‘Rethinking the OV/VO alternation in Old English: The effect of complexity, grammatical weight, and information status’, in Traugott, E. C. and Nevalainen, T. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English. Oxford University Press, pp. 835–45.
Thráinsson, H. 2003. ‘Syntactic variation, historical development, and minimalism’, in Hendrick, R. (ed.), Minimalist syntax. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 152–91.
Travis, L. 1984. ‘Parameters and effects of word order variation’, unpublished PhD thesis, MIT.
van Gelderen, E. 2004. Grammaticalization as economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van Kemenade, A. 1987. Syntactic Case and morphological case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris.
Walkden, G. 2012. ‘Against Inertia’, Lingua 122(8): 891–901.
Wallenberg, J. 2009. ‘Antisymmetry and the conservation of c-command: scrambling and phrase structure in synchronic and diachronic perspective’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Wexler, K. and Culicover, P. 1980. Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Yang, C. 2002. Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford University Press.
Yang, C. 2013. ‘Tipping Points’, talk given at the 36 Generative Linguistics in the Old World (GLOW36) Conference, Lund.
Zeijlstra, H. 2004. ‘Sentential negation and negative concord’, unpublished PhD thesis, Amsterdam University.
Zeijlstra, H. 2008. ‘On the syntactic flexibility of formal features’, in Biberauer, (ed.), pp. 143–73.