Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2017
  • Online publication date: May 2017

18 - Can Teams Have a Creative Personality?

from Part III - Creativity and Personality
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. In Staw, B. M. & Cummings, L. L. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123–67). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Baer, M. (2010). The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: a comprehensive examination and extension. Journal ofApplied Psychology, 95, 592601. doi: 10.1037/a0018761
Baer, M., Oldham, G., Jacobsohn, G., & Hollingshead, A. (2008). The personality composition of teams and creativity: the moderating role of team creative confidence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 255–82. doi: 10.1002/j.2162–6057.2008.tb01299.x
Barrick, M. R., and Mount, M. K. (1991).The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 126. doi: 10.1111/j.1744–6570.1991.tb00688.x
Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–76. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002255
Barry, B., & Stewart, G. (1997). Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: the role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 6278. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.82.1.62
Bell, S. T. (2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 595615. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.92.3.595
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28, 238–56. doi:10.5465/AMR.2003.9416096
Bolin, A. U., & Neuman, G. A. (2006). Personality, process, and performance in interactive brainstorming groups. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20, 565–85. doi: 10.1007/s10869-005–9000-7
Bradley, B. H., Klotz, A. C., Postlethwaite, B. E., & Brown, K. G. (2012). Ready to rumble: how team personality composition and task conflict interact to improve performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 385–92. doi: 10.1037/a0029845
Burgelman, R. A., (2002). Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 325–57. doi: 10.2307/3094808
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380400. doi: 10.1037/h0040373
DeShon, R. P., & Gillespie, J. Z. (2005). A motivated action theory account of goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 10961127. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.90.6.1096
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–8. doi: 10.1037/0003–066X.41.10.1040
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 290309. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
Ford, C., & Sullivan, D. M. (2004). A time for everything: how the timing of novel contributions influences project team outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 279–92. doi: 10.1002/job.241
George, J. M. (2007). Creativity in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 1, 439–77. doi: 10.1080/078559814
Gilson, L. L. (2008). Why Be Creative: A Review of the Practical Outcomes Associated with Creativity at the Individual, Group, and Organizational Levels. In Zhou, J. & Shalley, C. E. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp. 303–22). New York: Erlbaum
Gilson, L. L., Lim, H. S., Litchfield, R. C., & Gilson, P. W. (2015). Creativity in Teams: A Key Building Block for Innovation and Entrepreneurship. In Shalley, C. E. & Zhou, J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship. Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199927678.013.0015
Gilson, L. L., & Madjar, N. (2011). Radical and incremental creativity: antecedents and processes. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 21–8. doi: 10.1037/a0017863
Gilson, L. L., Litchfield, R., & Gilson, P. W. (2014). An Examination of the Relationship between Time and Creativity. In Shipp, A. J. & Fried, Y. (eds.), Time and Work: Current Issues in Work and Organizational Psychology (pp. 141–62). New York: Psychology Press.
Glynn, M. A. (1996). Innovative genius: a framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21, 10811111. doi:10.5465/AMR.1996.9704071864
Gilson, L. L., Mathieu, J. E., Shalley, C. E., & Ruddy, T. M. (2005). Creativity and standardization: complementary or conflicting drivers of team effectiveness? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 521–31. doi:10.5465/amj.2005.17407916
Glynn, M. A. (1996). Innovative genius: a framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21, 10811111. doi:10.5465/AMR.1996.9704071864
Gong, Y., Kim, T. Y., Zhu, J., & Lee, D. R. (2013). A multilevel model of team goal orientation, information exchange, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 827–51. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0177
González-Romá, V., Fortes-Ferreira, L., & Peiró, J. M. (2009). Team climate, climate strength, and team performance: a longitudinal study. Journal of Occupatinal and Organizational Psychology, 82, 511–36. doi: 10.1348/096317908X370025
Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 13981405. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.37.8.1398
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 693706. doi: 10.2307/20159793
Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group Tasks, Group Interaction Process, and Group Performance Effectiveness: A Review and Proposed Integration. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 4599). New York: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60248–8
Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: a field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17, 484500. doi: 0.1287/orsc.1060.0200
Harrison, S. H., & Rouse, E. D. (2014). Let’s dance! Elastic coordination in creative group work: a qualitative study of modern dancers. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1256–83. doi: 10.5465/amj.2012.0343
Harvey, S. (2014). Creative synthesis: exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Academy of Management Review, 39, 324–43. doi: 10.5465/amr.2012.0224
He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15, 481–94. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
Hunter, S. T., & Cushenbery, L. (2014). Is being a jerk necessary for originality? Examining the role of disagreeableness in the sharing and utilization of original ideas. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30, 621. doi: 10.1007/s10869-014–9386-1
Jabri, M. M. (1991). The development of conceptually independent subscales in the measurement of modes of problem solving. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 975–83. doi: 10.1177/001316449105100417
Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: a description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622–9. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.61.5.622
Kohn, N., Paulus, P., & Choi, Y. (2011). Building on the ideas of others: an examination of the idea combination process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 554–61. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.01.004
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A Multilevel Approach to Theory and Research in Organizations: Contextual, Temporal, and Emergent Processes. In Klein, K. J. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (eds.), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (pp. 390). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press: doi: 10.5897/PPR2013.0102.
Litchfield, R. C. (2008). Brainstorming reconsidered: a goal-based view. Academy of Management Review, 33, 649–68. doi:10.5465/AMR.2008.32465708
Madjar, N., Greenberg, E., & Chen, Z. (2011). Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 730–43. doi: 10.1037/a0022416
Mainemelis, C. (2010). Stealing fire: creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas. Academy of Management Review, 35, 558–78.
March, J. G. (1976). The Technology of Foolishness. In March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (eds.), Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations (pp. 6981). Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.
Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997–2007: a review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410–76. doi: 10.1177/0149206308316061
Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Donsbach, J. S., & Alliger, G. M. (2014). A review and integration of team composition models moving toward a dynamic and temporal framework. Journal of Management, 40, 130–60. doi:10.1177/0149206313503014
Mathisen, G. E., Martinsen, Ø., & Einarsen, S. (2008). The relationship between creative personality composition, innovative team climate, and team innovativeness: an input-process-output perspective. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 1331. doi:10.1002/j.2162–6057.2008.tb01078.x
McCrae, R.R.(1987).Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personaity and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–65. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.52.6.1258
Miron-Spektor, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2011). The effect of conformists and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: reconciling the innovation paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 740–60. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2011.64870100
Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107–20. doi:10.1080/10400419.2003.9651408
Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 2743. doi: 10.1037/0033–2909.103.1.27
Murnighan, J. K., & Conlon, D. E. (1991). The dynamics of intense work groups: a study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 165–85. doi: 10.2307/2393352
Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., & Pluntke, F. (2006). Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 257–79. doi: 10.1002/job.376
Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied Imagination. New York: Scribner.
Paulus, P. B., Dzindolet, M. T., Poletes, G., & Camacho, L. M. (1993). Perception of performance in group brainstorming: the illusion of group productivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 7889. doi:10.1177/0146167293191009
Peeters, M. A. G., Van Tuijl, H. F. J. M., Rutte, C. G., & Reymen, I. M. M. J. (2006). Personality and team performance: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Personality, 20, 377–96. doi: 0.1002/per.588
Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2014). A social composition view of team creativity: the role of member nationality heterogeneous ties outside the team. Organization Science, 25, 1434–52. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2014.0912
Pirola-Merlo, A. (2010). Agile innovation: the role of team climate in rapid research and development. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 1075–84. doi: 10.1348/096317909X480653
Reinig, B. A., Briggs, R. O., and Nunamaker, J. F. Jr. (2007). On the measurement of ideation quality. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 143–61. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222230407
Reiter-Palmon, R., Wigert, B., & Vreede, T. d. (2012). Team Creativity and Innovation: The Effect of Group Composition, Social Processes, and Cognition. In Michael, D. M. (ed.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp. 295326). San Diego: Academic Press.
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305310. doi:10.2307/20342603.
Robert, C., & Cheung, Y. H. (2010). An examination of the relationship between conscientiousness and group performance on a creative task. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 222–31. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.01.005
Schilpzand, M. C., Herold, D. M., & Shalley, C. E. (2011). Members’ openness to experience and teams’ creative performance. Small Group Research, 42, 5576. doi:10.1177/1046496410377509
Shalley, C. E. (1991). Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 179–85. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.76.2.179
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 933–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007
Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2013). Translating team creativity to innovation implementation: the role of team composition and climate for innovation. Journal of Management, 39, 684708. doi: 10.1177/014920631039418
Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: a multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 315–30. doi: 10.2307/3069349
Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 500–17. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.88.3.500
Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14, 516–31. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4308376
Weick, K. E. (1998). Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science, 9, 543–55. doi: 10.1287/orsc.9.5.543
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293321. doi:10.2307/258761
Zack, M. H. (2000). Jazz improvisation and organizing: once more from the top. Organization Science, 11, 227–34. doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.2.227.12507
Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2011). Deepening Our Understanding of Creativity in the Workplace: A Review of Different Approaches to Creativity Research. In Zedeck, S. (ed.), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1: Building and Developing the Organization (pp. 275302). Washington, DC. American Psychogical Association. doi: 10.1037/12169-009