Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Foreword: a crisis in public policing
- Preface
- one Policing in perilous times: change and leadership
- two Police systems, perspectives and contested paradigms
- three Sea of troubles: the nature of policing
- four When matters become ‘really real’: commanding operations
- five Leadership and leadership development
- six Towards a comprehensive paradigm
- Appendix
- References
- Index
two - Police systems, perspectives and contested paradigms
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 March 2022
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Foreword: a crisis in public policing
- Preface
- one Policing in perilous times: change and leadership
- two Police systems, perspectives and contested paradigms
- three Sea of troubles: the nature of policing
- four When matters become ‘really real’: commanding operations
- five Leadership and leadership development
- six Towards a comprehensive paradigm
- Appendix
- References
- Index
Summary
There is a range of policing systems in various societies and it is useful to clarify briefly what formed them, what they look like and how they differ (Mawby, 1999). For there is a tendency, which many follow, to ignore history and to generalise sweepingly about policing. The systems do have universal elements that cross cultures, but we should remain conscious of the dissimilarities and bear in mind system and cultural differences. Police research has been conducted predominately in the English-speaking world and often to the neglect of material in other languages which could provide access to a rich variety of systems (Hoogenboom and Punch, 2012). Brodeur (2010), for example, was a French Canadian whose work fruitfully draws on sources in French, both historical and modern, which he employs to chart the differences between the two dominant ‘French-Continental’ and ‘Anglo-Saxon’ criminal justice systems. Students of policing can be much aided by his insightful work. Also it remains the case that, despite change, police systems often continue to display genetic features reflecting their society's history and culture. Therefore, this chapter takes a closer at different police systems and deals with the important distinction made by Brodeur (1983, 2010) between what he calls ‘low’ and ‘high’ policing and his insights on ‘militarised’ policing. The chapter then examines the concept of policing paradigms as well as paradigm change in the UK and the Netherlands.
Police systems
It is possible to discern five main types of police systems or policing styles in existence since the start of ‘modern’ policing some two centuries ago. First, the French – or ‘Continental’ – model can be traced to the 17th century. In France, high-level magistrates working on behalf of the absolute monarch were tasked with a broad form of ‘government’ in regulating matters to protect the monarchy and ensure order in the cities where there was a continual threat of disturbances. The term ‘police’ was not then used and the broad concept of government was not at all like the modern notion of police; rather, it was an all-encompassing mandate utilising in practice a combination of central surveillance by spies and informers and of urban order maintenance by military-style units (Brodeur, 2010). There later evolved in France a system of local and national policing agencies falling under diverse ministries and with a national, centrally led gendarmerie for maintaining state control that was formally part of the military.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- What Matters in Policing?Change, Values and Leadership in Turbulent Times, pp. 29 - 68Publisher: Bristol University PressPrint publication year: 2015