Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T05:18:59.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Appendix 11.2 - Empirical Estimation of the Mean and Standard Deviation of Valence Effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2009

James F. Adams
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Samuel Merrill III
Affiliation:
Wilkes University, Pennsylvania
Bernard Grofman
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access

Summary

Order-of-Magnitude Estimates for v and σV

We obtain order-of-magnitude estimates for both v and σV from the typical margin of victory and the typical accuracy of national polls in American and French presidential elections. Let g be the probability density of the voter distribution. Initially, we focus on the expected value of v + X, which is v. Elementary algebra shows that this term, v, shifts the cut-point between supporters of D and of R by the quantity v/[2(rd)] and thus adds to D's vote share a proportion given by the integral of g over an interval of length v/[2(rd)].

We use the traditional 1–7 scales of the American National Election Study and French Presidential Election Study. Because the interval just described is typically near the middle of the scale where, empirically, values of g are on the order of 0.20, that integral is of the order of 0.20v/[2(rd)]. Typically, in American and French elections, d is near 3.0 and r is near 5.0 (or 6.0), and the vote share of the winner ranges from 50 percent to about 62 percent – that is, a range of about twelve percentage points, or 0.12 when expressed as a proportion. Because variation in the winner's margin from election to election is due only in part to valence effects, this represents only an upper bound for the effect of valence characteristics on vote share. For this upper bound for v, we have, very roughly, 0.12 = 0.20v/[2(5.0 – 3.0)], or v ≅ 2.4. Thus values of v in the range from 0 to 2 or 3 appear to be plausible.

Type
Chapter
Information
A Unified Theory of Party Competition
A Cross-National Analysis Integrating Spatial and Behavioral Factors
, pp. 289 - 292
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×