Akey, J. M., Ruhe, A. L., Akey, D. T., et al. (2010). Tracking footprints of artificial selection in the dog genome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107(3), 1160–1165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Albert, F. W., Carlborg, O., Plyusnina, I., et al. (2009). Genetic architecture of tameness in a rat model of animal domestication. Genetics 182, 541–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alekshun, M. N. and Levy, S. B. (2007). Molecular mechanisms of antibacterial multidrug resistance. Cell 128(6), 1037–1050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alexander, D. R. (2013). The implications of evolutionary biology for religious belief. In Kampourakis, K. (Ed.) The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer, 179–204.Google Scholar

Alexopoulos, J. S., Grievel, R. A. F., and Robertson, P. B. (1988). Microscopic lamellar deformation features in quartz: discriminative characteristics of shock-generated varieties. Geology 16(9), 796–779.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alizon, S., Luciani, F., and Regoes, R. R. (2011). Epidemiological and clinical consequences of within-host evolution. Trends in Microbiology 19(1), 24–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Allchin, D. (2005). The dilemma of dominance. Biology and Philosophy 20, 427–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarez, L. W., Alvarez, W., Asaro, F., and Michel, H. V. (1980). Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction. Science 208(4448), 1095–1108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Appel, T. A. (1987). The Cuvier–Geoffroy Debate: French Biology in the Decades Before Darwin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Arabatzis, T. and Kindi, V. (2008). The problem of conceptual change in the philosophy and history of science. In Vosniadou, S. (Ed.) International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change. New York and London: Routledge, 345–373.Google Scholar

Ariew, A. (2003). Ernst Mayr’s “Ultimate/Proximate” distinction reconsidered and reconstructed. Biology & Philosophy 18, 553–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ariew, A. (2007). Teleology. In Hull, D. and Ruse, M. (Eds.) The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 160–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ariew, A. and Lewontin, R. C. (2004). The confusions of fitness. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55, 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arthur, W. (2002). The emerging conceptual framework of evolutionary developmental biology. Nature 415, 757–764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Arthur, W. (2004). Biased Embryos and Evolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arthur, W. (2011). Evolution: A Developmental Approach. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Asher, Y. M. and Kemler-Nelson, D. G. (2008). Was it designed to do that? Children’s focus on intended function in their conceptualization of artifacts. Cognition 106, 474–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Athanasiou, K. and Papadopoulou, P. (2011). Conceptual ecology of the evolution acceptance among Greek education students: knowledge, religious practices and social influences. International Journal of Science Education, .

Atran, S. (2004). In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Audi, R. (2009). Religion and the politics of science: can evolutionary biology be religiously neutral?Philosophy & Social Criticism 35(1–20), 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Audi, R. (2011). Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge (3rd edn.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Avise, J. C. (2010). Inside the Human Genome: A Case for Non-Intelligent Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayala, F. J. (2006). Darwin and Intelligent Design. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.Google Scholar

Ayala, F. J. (2007). Darwin’s Gift to Science and Religion. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar

Ayala, F. J. (2009). Molecular evolution. In Ruse, M. and Travis, J. (Eds.) Evolution: The First Four Billion Years. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 132–151.Google Scholar

Ayala, F. J. (2010a). Am I a Monkey?Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Ayala, F. J. (2010b). The difference of being human: morality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107(2), 9015–9022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ayala, F. J. (2013). Biology and religion: the case for evolution. In Kampourakis, K. (Ed.) The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer, 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barlow, N. (Ed.) (2005) [1958]. The Autobiography of Charles Darwin 1809–1882. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Bateson, P. and Gluckman, P. (2011). Plasticity, Robustness, Development and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baum, D. A. and Offner, S. (2008). Phylogenies and tree-thinking. The American Biology Teacher 70(4), 222–229.Google Scholar

Baum, D. and Smith, S. (2013). Tree Thinking: An Introduction to Phylogenetic Biology. Greenwood Village, CO: Roberts and Company Publishers.Google Scholar

Baum, D. A., DeWitt Smith, S., and Donovan, S. S. (2005). The tree thinking challenge. Science 310, 979–980.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beatty, J. (1984). Chance and natural selection. Philosophy of Science 51(2), 183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beatty, J. (1994). The proximate/ultimate distinction in the multiple careers of Ernst Mayr. Biology & Philosophy 9, 333–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beatty, J. (1995). The evolutionary contingency thesis. In Wolters, G. and Lennox, J. G. (Eds.) Concepts, Theories, and Rationality in the Biological Sciences: The Second Pittsburgh-Konstanz Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 45–81.Google Scholar

Beatty, J. (2006). Replaying life’s tape. Journal of Philosophy CIII(7), 336–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beatty, J. (2010). Reconsidering the importance of chance variation. In Müller, G. and Pigliucci, M. (Eds.) Evolution: The Extended Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bechtel, W. (2013). Understanding biological mechanisms: using illustrations from circadian rhythm research. In Kampourakis, K. (Ed.) Philosophical Issues in Biology Education. Springer: Dordrecht, 487–510.Google Scholar

Bechtel, W. and Abrahamsen, A. (2005). Explanation: a mechanistic alternative. Studies in History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36, 421–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belyaev, D. K. (1979). Destabilizing selection as a factor in domestication. Journal of Heredity 70, 301–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benton, M. (2009). Paleontology and the history of life. In Ruse, M. and Travis, J. (Eds.) Evolution: The First Four Billion Years. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 80–104.Google Scholar

Benton, M. J. and Donoghue, P. C. J. (2007). Paleontological evidence to date the tree of life. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24, 26–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berger, L. R., de Ruitter, D. J., Churchill, S. E., et al. (2010). Australopithecus sediba: a new species of Homo-like Australopith from South Africa. Science 328, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berkman, M. and Plutzer, E. (2010). Evolutionism, Creationism, and the Battle to Control America’s Schools. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berkman, M. and Plutzer, E. (2011). Defeating Creationism in the courtroom, but not in the classroom. Science 331(6016), 404–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berkman, M. and Plutzer, E. (2012). An evolving controversy: the struggle to teach science in science classes. The American Educator Summer, 12–23.

Blancke, S., Hjermitslev, H. H., Braeckman, J., and Kjærgaard, P. C. (2013). Creationism in Europe: facts, gaps and prospects. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, .CrossRef

Bloom, P. (2004). Descartes’ Baby: How the Science of Child Development Explains What Makes Us Human. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bloom, P. and Weisberg, D. S. (2007). Childhood origins of adult resistance to science. Science 316, 996–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bock, W. J. (1980). The definition and recognition of biological adaptation. American Zoologist 20(1), 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohor, B. F., Foord, E. E., Modreski, P. J., and Triplehorn, D. M. (1984). Mineralogic evidence for an impact event at the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary. Science 224(4651), 867–869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bowler, P. J. (1975). The changing meaning of evolution. Journal of the History of Ideas 36(1), 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowler, P. J. (1976). Malthus, Darwin and the concept of struggle. Journal of the History of Ideas 37(4), 631–650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bowler, P. J. (1983). The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian Evolution Theories in the Decades around 1900. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Bowler, P. J. (2005). Revisiting the eclipse of Darwinism. Journal of the History of Biology 38, 19–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bowler, P. J. (2007). Monkey Trials and Gorilla Sermons: Evolution and Christianity from Darwin to Intelligent Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowler, P. J. (2009a). Evolution: The History of an Idea. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Bowler, P. J. (2009b). Geographical distribution in the Origin of Species. In Ruse, M. and Richards, R. J. (Eds.) The Cambridge Companion to the “Origin of Species.”Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 153–172.Google Scholar

Bowler, P. J. (2013). Darwin Deleted: Imagining a World Without Darwin. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowler, P. J. and Morus, I. R. (2005). Making Modern Science: A Historical Survey. Chicago, IL: The Continuum University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyer, P. (2001). Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Branch, G. and Scott, E. C. (2009). The latest face of Creationism. Scientific American 300(1), 92–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brandon, R. N. (1990). Adaptation and Environment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Brem, S. K., Ranney, M., and Schindel, J. (2003). Perceived consequences of evolution: college students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Science Education 87(2), 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brigandt, I. (2013). Intelligent Design and the nature of science: philosophical and pedagogical points. In Kampourakis, K. (Ed.) The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer, 205–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brigandt, I. and Love, A. C. (2010). Evolutionary novelty and the evo-devo synthesis: field notes. Evolutionary Biology 37, 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brigandt, I. and Love, A. C. (2012). Conceptualizing evolutionary novelty: moving beyond definitional debates. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 318B, 417–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooke, J. H. (1991). Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brooke, J. H. (2001). The Wilberforce–Huxley debate: why did it happen?Science & Christian Belief 13(2), 127–141.Google Scholar

Brooke, J. H. (2009a). Darwin and Victorian Christianity. In Hodge, J. and Radick, G. (Eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Darwin (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooke, J. H. (2009b). “Laws impressed on matter by the creator”? The Origin and the question of religion. In Ruse, M. and Richards, R. J. (Eds.) The Cambridge Companion to the “Origin of Species.”Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 256–274.Google Scholar

Brooke, J. H. and Numbers, R. L. (2010). Science and Religion Around the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Browne, J. (2003a) [1995]. Charles Darwin: Voyaging. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar

Browne, J. (2003b) [2002]. Charles Darwin: The Power of Place. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar

Browne, J. (2006). Darwin’s “Origin of Species”: A Biography. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar

Burian, R. M. (1992). Adaptation: historical perspectives. In Keller, E. F. and Lloyd, E. A. (Eds.) Keywords in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 7–12.Google Scholar

Burian, R. M. (2013). On concepts that change with the advance of science: comments on Lennox. In Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (Eds.) Concepts and their Role in Knowledge: Reflections on Objectivist Epistemology. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burian, R. M. and Kampourakis, K. (2013). Against “genes for”: could an inclusive concept of genetic material effectively replace gene concepts? In Kampourakis, K. (Ed.) The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer, 597–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual Change in Childhood. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Carey, S. (2009). The Origin of Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, S. B. (2003). Genetics and the making of Homo sapiens. Nature 422, 849–857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carroll, S. B. (2005a). Endless Forms Most Beautiful: The New Science of Evo-Devo. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Carroll, S. B. (2005b). Evolution at two levels: on genes and form. PLoS Biology 3, 1159–1166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cavicchioli, R. (2011). Archaea: timeline of the third domain. Nature Reviews Microbiology 9, 51–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: belief revision, mental model transformation and categorical shift. In Vosniadou, S. (Ed.) International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change. New York and London: Routledge, 61–82.Google Scholar

Ciccarelli, F. D., Doerks, T., Von Mering, C., Creevey, C. J., Snel, B., and Bork, P. (2006). Toward automatic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life. Science 311, 1283–1287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cleland, C. E. (2002). Methodological and epistemic differences between historical science and experimental science. Philosophy of Science 69, 474–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cleland, C. E. (2011). Prediction and explanation in historical natural science. British Journal of Philosophy of Science 62, 551–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cleland, C. E. and Zerella, M. (2013). What is life? In Kampourakis, K. (Ed.) The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer, 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohn, M. J. and Tickle, C. (1999). Developmental basis of limblessness and axial regionalization in snakes. Nature 399, 474–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conway Morris, S. (2003). Life’s Solution: Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coppinger, R. and Coppinger, L. (2001). Dogs: A Startling New Understanding of Canine Origin, Behaviour and Evolution. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar

Cornell, J. F. (1984). Analogy and technology in Darwin’s vision of nature. Journal of the History of Biology 17(3), 303–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Corsi, P. (2005). Before Darwin: transformist concepts in European natural history. Journal of the History of Biology 38, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coyne, J. A. (2009). Why Evolution is True. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Coyne, J. A. (2012). Science, religion, and society: the problem of evolution in America. Evolution 66(8), 2654–2663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coyne, J. and Orr, H. (2004). Speciation. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar

Curry, A. (2009). Creationist beliefs persist in Europe. Science 323, 1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cyranoski, D., Grimme, S., and Watt, F. (2010). A global survey of the scientifically literate public reveals a Pacific divide on key issues in science. Nature 467, 388–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daeschler, E. B., Shubin, N. H., and Jenkins, F. A. (2006). A Devonian tetrapod-like fish and the evolution of the tetrapod body plan. Nature 440, 757–763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Danielson, D. R. (2009). That the Copernican System demoted humans from the center of the cosmos. In Numbers, R. (Eds.) Galileo Goes to Jail, and Other Myths About Science and Religion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 50–58.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (1st edn.). London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1868). The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication, Vol. 2. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (1st edn.). London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1964) [1859]. On the Origin of Species: A Facsimile of the First Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. R. and Wallace, A. R. (1858). On the tendency of species to form varieties; and on the perpetuation of varieties and species by natural means of selection. Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London. Zoology 3, 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darwin, F. (1995) [1902]. The Life of Charles Darwin. London: Senate.Google Scholar

Darwin, F. (Ed.) (1909). The Foundations of the Origin of Species: Two Essays Written in 1842 and 1844. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dawkins, R. (2006a) [1986]. The Blind Watchmaker. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (2006b). The God Delusion. London: Bantam Press.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (2009). The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution. London: Bantam Press.Google Scholar

De Robertis, E. M. (2008). Evo-devo: variations on ancestral themes. Cell 132, 185–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

De Robertis, E. M. (2009). Spemann’s organizer and the self-regulation of embryonic fields. Mechanisms of Development 126, 925–941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

De Robertis, E. M. and Sasai, Y. (1996). A common plan for dorsoventral patterning in Bilateria. Nature 380, 37–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Deniz, H., Donnelly, L. A., and Yilmaz, I. (2008). Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45(4), 420–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennett, D. (2006). Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Depew, D. (2008). Consequence etiology and biological teleology in Aristotle and Darwin. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39, 379–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Depew, D. (2013). Conceptual change and the rhetoric of evolutionary theory: “Force talk” as a case study and challenge for science pedagogy. In Kampourakis, K. (Ed.) The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer, 121–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Depew, D. J. and Weber, B. H. (1995). Darwinism Evolving: Systems Dynamics and the Genealogy of Natural Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Desjardins, E. (2011). Historicity and experimental evolution. Biology & Philosophy 26, 339–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Desmond, A. and Moore, J. (1994) [1991]. Darwin: The Life of a Tormented Evolutionist. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Desmond, A. and Moore, J. (2009). Darwin’s Sacred Cause: How a Hatred of Slavery Shaped Darwin’s Views on Human Evolution. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar

Desmond, D., Moore, J., and Browne, J. (2007). Charles Darwin. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Diamond, J. M. (1997). Guns Germs and Steel: The Fate of Human Societies. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Diamond, J. (2002). Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication. Nature 418, 700–707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Diedrich, C. R. and Flynn, J. L. (2011). HIV-1/Mycobacterium tuberculosis coinfection immunology: how does HIV-1 exacerbate tuberculosis?Infection and Immunity 79(4), 1407–1417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dietrich, M. (2010). Microevolution and macroevolution are governed by the same processes. In Ayala, F. J. and Arp, R. (Eds.) Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 169–179.Google Scholar

Dietrich, M. (2013). Molecular evolution. In Kampourakis, K. (Ed.) The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer, 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, T., Cantor, G., and Pumfrey, S. (Eds.) (2011). Science and Religion: New Historical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher 35(3), 125–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donoghue, P. C. J. and Benton, M. J. (2007). Rocks and clocks: calibrating the tree of life using fossils and molecules. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22, 424–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Doolittle, W. F. (2000). Uprooting the tree of life. Scientific American 282(2), 90–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Duit, R. and Treagust, D. F. (2012). How can conceptual change contribute to theory and practice in science education? In Fraser, B.J., Tobin, K. G., and McRobbie, C. J. (Eds.) Second International Handbook of Science Education. Dordrecht: Springer, 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duncan, M. J., Bourrat, P., DeBerardinis, J., and O’ Malley, M. (2013). Small things, big consequences: microbiological perspectives on biology. In Kampourakis, K. (Ed.) The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer, 373–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dupré, J. (2003). Darwin’s Legacy: What Evolution Means Today. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dye, C. and Williams, B. (2010). The population dynamics and control of tuberculosis. Science 328, 856–861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ecklund, E. H. (2010). Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really Think. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eldredge, N. (2000). The Triumph of Evolution and the Failure of Creationism. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar

Eldredge, N. and Gould, S. J. (1972). Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In Schopf, T. J. M. (Ed.) Models in Paleobiology. San Francisco, CA: Freeman, Cooper, 82–115.Google Scholar

Endersby, J. (2008). Imperial Nature: Joseph Hooker and the Practices of Victorian Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Endersby, J. (Ed.) (2009). Charles Darwin: On the Origin of Species. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ereshefsky, M. (2010a). Darwin’s solution to the species problem. Synthese 175, 405–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ereshefsky, M. (2010b). Microbiology and the species problem. Biology & Philosophy 25, 553–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erwin, D. H. (2010). Microevolution and macroevolution are not governed by the same processes. In Ayala, F. J. and Arp, R. (Eds.) Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 180–193.Google Scholar

Evans, L. T. (1984). Darwin’s use of the analogy between artificial and natural selection. Journal of the History of Biology 17(1), 113–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Evans, M. E. (2001). Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology 42, 217–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Evans, M. E. (2008). Conceptual change and evolutionary biology: a developmental analysis. In Vosniadou, S. (Ed.) International Handbook of Research in Conceptual Change. New York and London: Routledge, 263–294.Google Scholar

Fabre, P. H., Rodrigues, A., and Douzery, E. J. P. (2009). Patterns of macroevolution among primates inferred from a supermatrix of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 53, 808–825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Firestein, S. (2012). Ignorance: How it Drives Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fitch, W. M. (2000). Homology: a personal view on some of the problems. Trends in Genetics 16, 227–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fong, J. J., Brown, J. M., Fujita, M. K., and Boussau, B. (2012). A phylogenomic approach to vertebrate phylogeny supports a turtle-archosaur affinity and a possible paraphyletic lissamphibia. PLoS ONE 7(11): e48990, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forber, P. (2010). Confirmation and explaining how possible. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41, 32–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Forber, P. (2013). Debating the power and scope of adaptation. In Kampourakis, K. (Ed.) The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer, 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forber, P. and Griffith, E. (2011). Historical reconstruction: gaining epistemic access to the deep past. Philosophy and Theory in Biology 3, e203, CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frigg, R. and Hartmann, S. (2012). Models in science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. .

Ganapathy, R. (1980). A major meteorite impact on the Earth 65 million years ago: evidence from the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary clay. Science 209, 921–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gandhi, N. R., Moll, A., Sturm, A. W., et al. (2006). Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis as a cause of death in patients co-infected with tuberculosis and HIV in a rural area of South Africa. Lancet 368, 1575–1580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gandhi, N. R., Nunn, P., Dheda, K., et al. (2010). Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: a threat to global control of tuberculosis. Lancet 375, 1830–1843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gass, G. L. and Bolker, J. A. (2003). Modularity. In Hall, B. K. and Olson, W. M. (Eds.) Keywords and Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 260–267.Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A. (2003). The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelman, S. A. (2004). Psychological essentialism in children. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(9), 404–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gelman, S. A. and Bloom, P. (2000). Young children are sensitive to how an object was created when deciding what to name it. Cognition 76, 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelman, S. A. and Ebeling, K. S. (1998). Shape and representational status in children’s early naming. Cognition 66, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gelman, S. A. and Hirschfeld, L. A. (1999). How biological is essentialism? In Medin, D. L. and Atran, S. (Eds.) Folkbiology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 403–446.Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A. and Markman, E. M. (1986). Categories and induction in young children. Cognition 23, 183–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gelman, S. A. and Markman, E. M. (1987). Young children’s inductions from natural kinds: the role of categories and appearances. Child Development 58, 1532–1541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gelman, S. A. and Rhodes, M. (2012). “Two-thousand years of stasis”: how psychological essentialism impedes evolutionary understanding. In Rosengren, K., Brem, S., Evans, E. M., and Sinatra, G. M. (Eds.) Evolution Challenges: Integrating Research and Practice in Teaching and Learning About Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelman, S. A. and Wellman, H. M. (1991). Insides and essences: early understandings of the nonobvious. Cognition 38, 213–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giere, R. N. (2006). Scientific Perspectivism. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilbert, S. F. and Burian, R. M. (2003a). Developmental genetics. In Hall, B. K. and Olson, W. M. (Eds.) Keywords and Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 68–74.Google Scholar

Gilbert, S. F. and Burian, R. M. (2003b). Development, evolution and evolutionary developmental biology. In Hall, B.K. and Olson, W. M. (Eds.) Keywords and Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 61–68.Google Scholar

Gingerich, O. (1985). Did Copernicus owe a debt to Aristarchus?Journal for the History of Astronomy 16(1), 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gingerich, O. (2005). Copernicus Nicholas. In Heilbron, J.L. (Ed.) The Oxford Guide to the History of Physics and Astronomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 73–74.Google Scholar

Glick, T. F. and Kohn, D. (1996). Charles Darwin on Evolution: The Development of the Theory of Natural Selection. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar

Godfrey-Smith, P. (2003). Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godfrey-Smith, P. (2009). Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, R. F. and Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). Developmental “roots” in mature biological knowledge. Psychological Science 20(4), 480–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goldstein, B. R. (2002). Copernicus and the origins of his heliocentric system. Journal for the History of Astronomy 33, 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, S. J. (1977). Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. (1996). Full House: The Spread of Excellence from Plato to Darwin. New York: Harmony Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, S. J. (1999). Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. (2000) [1989]. Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. London: Vintage.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. (2002). The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA and London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. and Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, Series B, Biological Sciences 205, 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, S. J. and Vrba, E. S. (1982). Exaptation: a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8(1), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graebsch, A. and Schiermeier, Q. (2006). Anti-evolutionists raise their profile in Europe. Nature 444, 406–407.Google Scholar

Grant, P. R. and Grant, B. R. (2002). Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin’s finches. Science 296, 707–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grant, P. R. and Grant, B. R. (2008). How and Why Species Multiply: The Radiation of Darwin’s Finches. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gregory, T. R. (2008). Understanding evolutionary trees. Evolution: Education and Outreach 1, 121–137.Google Scholar

Grehan, J. R. and Schwartz, J. H. (2009). Evolution of the second orangutan: phylogeny and biogeography of hominid origins. Journal of Biogeography 36(10), 1823–1844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greif, M., Kemler-Nelson, D., Keil, F. C., and Guiterrez, F. (2006). What do children want to know about animals and artifacts? Domain-specific requests for information. Psychological Science 17(6), 455–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greiffenhagen, C. and Sherman, W. (2008). Kuhn and conceptual change: on the analogy between conceptual change in science and children. Science & Education 17, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grene, M. and Depew, D. (2004). The Philosophy of Biology: An Episodic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gribaldo, S., Poole, A. M., Daubin, V., Forterre, P., and Brochier-Armanet, C., (2010). The origin of eukaryotes and their relationship with the archaea: are we at a phylogenomic impasse?Nature Reviews Microbiology 8, 743e752, CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gribbin, J. (2003). Science: A History. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Griffiths, A. J. F., Wessler, S., Carroll, S. B., and Doebley, J. (2012). Introduction to Genetic Analysis. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Hall, B. K. (2003). Descent with modification: the unity underlying homology and homoplasy as seen through an analysis of development and evolution. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 78, 409–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hall, B. K. (2012). Parallelism, deep homology and evo-devo. Evolution and Development 14(1), 29–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hall, B. K. and Kerney, R. (2012). Levels of biological organization and the origin of novelty. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 318B, 428–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, B. K. and Olson, W. M. (Eds.) (2003). Keywords and Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hameed, S. (2008). Bracing for Islamic Creationism. Science 322, 1637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hare, B., Brown, M., Williamson, C., and Tomasello, M. (2002).The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298, 1634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harrison, T. (2010). Apes among the tangled branches of human origins. Science 327, 532–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Heeney, J. L., Dalgleish, A. G., and Weiss, R. A. (2006). Origins of HIV and the evolution of resistance to AIDS. Science 313, 462–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Heilbron, J. L. (2010). Galileo. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hempel, C. (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Hempel, C. and Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science 15, 135–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herbert, S. (2005). Charles Darwin, Geologist. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Hilpinen, R. (2011). Artifact. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. .

Hitchcock, C. (2008). Causation. In Psillos, S. and Curd, M. (Eds.) The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science. New York: Routledge, 317–326.Google Scholar

Hodge, J. (2009). The notebook programmes and projects of Darwin’s London years. In Hodge, J. and Radick, G. (Eds.) Cambridge Companion to Darwin (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 44–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodge, J. (2010). Darwin, the Galápagos and his changing thoughts about species origins: 1835–1837. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 61(II, 7), 89–106.Google Scholar

Hodge, J. and Radick, G. (Eds.) (2009a). The Cambridge Companion to Darwin (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodge, J. and Radick, G. (2009b). Darwin’s theories in the intellectual long run. In Hodge, J. and Radick, G. (Eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Darwin (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 277–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodge, M. J. S. (1977). The structure and strategy of Darwin’s “long argument.”British Journal for the History of Science 10, 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodge, M. J. S. (1992). Darwin’s argument in the Origin. Philosophy of Science 59(3), 461–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodge, M. J. S. and Kohn, D. (1985). The immediate origins of natural selection. In Kohn, D. (Ed.) The Darwinian Heritage. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 185–206.Google Scholar

Hoekstra, H. E. and Coyne, J. A. (2007). The locus of evolution: evo devo and the genetics of adaptation. Evolution 61(5), 995–1016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hokayem, H. and Boujaoude, S. (2008). College students’ perceptions of the theory of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45(4), 395–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2013). Systematicity: The Nature of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hull, D. (1992). The particular circumstance model of scientific explanation. In Nitecki, M. and Nitecki, D. (Eds.) History and Evolution. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 69–80.Google Scholar

Hull, D. L. (2005). Deconstructing Darwin: evolutionary theory in context. Journal of the History of Biology 38(1), 137–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hull, D. L. (2009). Darwin’s science and Victorian philosophy of science. In Hodge, J. and Radick, G. (Eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Darwin (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hume, D. (1993) [1779/1777]. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and Natural History of Religion. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Huxley, J. (1942). Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Huxley, T. H. (1860). [Review of] The origin of Species. Westminster Review 17 (n.s.), 541–570.Google Scholar

Huxley, T. H. (1863). Evidence as to Man’s Place in Nature. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar

Inagaki, K. and Hatano, G. (2002). Young Children’s Naive Thinking About the Biological World. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Ingraham, J. (2010). March of the Microbes: Sighting the Unseen. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ingram, E. L. and Nelson, C. E. (2006). Relationship between achievement and students’ acceptance of evolution or creation in an upper-level evolution course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43(1), 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jablonski, D. (2004a). Extinction: past and present. Nature 427, 589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jablonski, D. (2004b). Extinction and the spatial dynamics of biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105, 11535–11538.Google Scholar

Jablonski, D. (2007). Scale and hierarchy in macroevolution. Palaeontology 50, 87–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jablonski, D. (2008). Species selection: theory and data. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 39, 501–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jamieson, A. and Radick, G. (2013). Putting Mendel in his place: how curriculum reform in genetics and counterfactual history of science can work together. In Kampourakis, K. (Ed.) The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer, 577–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kampourakis, K. (Ed.) (2013a). The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kampourakis, K. (2013b). Teaching about adaptation: why evolutionary history matters. Science & Education 22(2), 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kampourakis, K. and McComas, W. F. (2010). Charles Darwin and evolution: illustrating human aspects of science. Science & Education 19, 637–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kampourakis, K. and Nehm, R. (2014). History and philosophy of science and the teaching of evolution: students’ conceptions and explanations. In Matthews, M. R. (Ed.) International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Kampourakis, K. and Zogza, V. (2007). Students’ preconceptions about evolution: how accurate is the characterization as “Lamarckian” when considering the history of evolutionary thought?Science & Education 16(3–5), 393–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kampourakis, K. and Zogza, V. (2008). Students’ intuitive explanations of the causes of homologies and adaptations. Science & Education 17(1), 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kampourakis, K. and Zogza, V. (2009). Preliminary evolutionary explanations: a basic framework for conceptual change and explanatory coherence in evolution. Science & Education 18(10), 1313–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kampourakis, K., Pavlidi, V., Papadopoulou, M., and Palaiokrassa, E. (2012a). Children’s teleological intuitions: what kind of explanations do 7–8 year olds give for the features of organisms, artifacts and natural objects?Research in Science Education 42(4), 651–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kampourakis, K., Palaiokrassa, E., Papadopoulou, M., Pavlidi, V., and Argyropoulou, M. (2012b). Children’s intuitive teleology: shifting the focus of evolution education research. Evolution Education and Outreach 5(2), 279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, Kinds and Cognitive Development. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Keil, F. C. (1992). The origins of an autonomous biology. In Gunnar, M. R. and Maratsos, M. (Eds.) Modularity and Constraints in Language and Cognition: Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology, Vol. 25. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 103–138.Google Scholar

Keil, F. C. (1994). The birth and nurturance concepts by domains: the origins of concepts of living things. In Hirschfeld, L. A. and Gelman, S. (Eds.) Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 234–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keil, F. C. (1995). The growth of causal understanding of natural kinds. In Sperber, D., Premack, D., and Premack, A. J. (Eds.) Causal Cognition: A Multi-Disciplinary Debate. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 234–262.Google Scholar

Keil, F. C. and Newman, G. E. (2008). Two tales of conceptual change: what changes and what remains the same. In Vosniadou, S. (Ed.) International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change. New York and London: Routledge, 83–101.Google Scholar

Keil, F. C. and Wilson, R. A. (Eds.) (2000). Explanation and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Keil, F. C., Greif, M. A., and Kerner, R. S. (2007). A world apart: how concepts of the constructed world are different in representation and in development. In Margolis, E. and Laurence, S. (Eds.) Creations of the Mind: Essays on Artifacts and their Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 231–247.Google Scholar

Kelemen, D. (1999a). Function, goals and intention: children’s teleological reasoning about objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3(12), 461–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kelemen, D. (1999b). The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children. Cognition 70, 241–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kelemen, D. (1999c). Why are rocks pointy? Children’s preference for teleological explanations of the natural world. Developmental Psychology 35, 1440–1452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kelemen, D. (2003). British and American children’s preferences for teleo-functional explanations of the natural world. Cognition 88, 201–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kelemen, D. (2004). Are children “Intuitive Theists”? Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science 15(5), 295–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kelemen, D. (2012). Teleological minds: how natural intuitions about agency and purpose influence learning about evolution. In Rosengren, K., Brem, S., Evans, E. M., and Sinatra, G. M. (Eds.) Evolution Challenges: Integrating Research and Practice in Teaching and Learning About Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 66–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelemen, D. and Carey, S. (2007). The essence of artifacts: developing the design stance. In Margolis, E. and Laurence, S. (Eds.) Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and their Representation. New York: Oxford University Press, 212–230.Google Scholar

Kelemen, D. and DiYanni, C. (2005). Intuitions about origins: purpose and intelligent design in children’s reasoning about nature. Journal of Cognition and Development 6(1), 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelemen, D. and Rosset, E. (2009). The human function compunction: teleological explanation in adults. Cognition 111, 138–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Keller, E. F. (2010). The Mirage of a Space Between Nature and Nurture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keller, E. F. and Lloyd, E. A. (Eds.) (1992). Keywords in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Keynes, R. (2001). Darwin, His Daughter and Human Evolution. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar

Kitcher, P. (1981). Explanatory unification. Philosophy of Science 48(4), 507–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitcher, P. (1989). Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world. In Kitcher, P. and Salmon, W. C. (Eds.) Scientific Explanation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 410–505.Google Scholar

Kitcher, P. (2007). Living with Darwin. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kitcher, P. (2011). Militant modern atheism. Journal of Applied Philosophy 28(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knoll, A. H. (2011). The multiple origins of complex multicellularity. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 39, 217–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knoll, A. H. and Hewitt, D. (2011). Complex multicellularity: phylogenetic, functional and geological perspectives. In Sterelny, K. and Calcott, B. (Eds.) The Major Transitions in Evolution Revisited. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 251–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohn, D. (Ed.) (1985a). The Darwinian Heritage. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kohn, D. (1985b). Darwin’s principle of divergence as internal dialogue. In Kohn, D. (Ed.) The Darwinian Heritage. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 245–257.Google Scholar

Kohn, D. (2009). Darwin’s keystone: the principle of divergence. In Ruse, M. and Richards, R. J. (Eds.) The Cambridge Companion to the “Origin of Species.”Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 87–108.Google Scholar

Koonin, E. V. (2010a). The two empires and three domains of life in the postgenomic age. Nature Education 3(9), 27.Google Scholar

Koonin, E. V. (2010b). The origin and early evolution of eukaryotes in the light of phylogenomics. Genome Biology 11, 209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Koonin, E. V. (2011). The Logic of Chance: The Nature and Origin of Biological Evolution. Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press.Google Scholar

Krug, A. Z., Jablonski, D., and Valentine, J. W. (2009). Signature of the end-Cretaceous mass extinction in the modern biota. Science 323, 767–771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kuhn, T. S. (1996) [1962]. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (3rd edn.). Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kyte, F. T., Zhou, Z., and Wasson, J. T. (1980). Siderophile-enriched sediments from the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary. Nature 288, 651–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laland, K. N., Sterelny, K., Odling-Smee, F. J., Hoppitt, W., and Uller, T. (2011). Cause and effect in biology revisited: is Mayr’s proximate-ultimate dichotomy still useful?Science 334, 1512–1516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, F. J., Hoppitt, W., and Uller, T. (2012). More on how and why: cause and effect in biology revisited. Biology & Philosophy, .

Largent, M. A. (2009). Darwin’s analogy between artificial and natural selection in the Origin of Species. In Ruse, M. and Richards, R. J. (Eds.) The Cambridge Companion to the “Origin of Species.”Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 14–29.Google Scholar

Larson, E. J. (2004). Evolution: The Remarkable History of a Scientific Theory. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar

Laudan, R. (1987). From Mineralogy to Geology: The Foundation of a Science, 1650–1830. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lennox, J. G. (1992). Teleology. In Lloyd, E. and Keller, E.F. (Eds.) Keywords in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 122–127.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. (2005). Darwin’s methodological evolution. Journal of the History of Biology 38(1), 85–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lennox, J. G. (2010). The Darwin/Gray correspondence 1857–1869: an intelligent discussion about chance and design. Perspectives on Science 18(4), 456–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lennox, J. G. (2013a). Concepts, context and the advance of science. In Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J.G. (Eds.) Concepts and their Role in Knowledge: Reflections on Objectivist Epistemology. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 112–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lennox, J. G. (2013b). Conceptual development versus conceptual change: response to Burian. In Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J.G. (Eds.) Concepts and their Role in Knowledge: Reflections on Objectivist Epistemology. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lennox, J. G. and Kampourakis, K. (2013). Biological teleology: the need for history. In Kampourakis, K. (Ed.) The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer, 421–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lennox, J. G. and Wilson, B. E. (1994). Natural selection and the struggle for existence. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 25(1), 65–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levine, A. T. (2000). Which way is up? Thomas S. Kuhn’s analogy to conceptual development in childhood. Science & Education 9, 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewens, T. (2004). Organisms and Artifacts: Design in Nature and Elsewhere. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lewens, T. (2007). Adaptation. In Hull, D. L. and Ruse, M. (Eds.) Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–21.Google Scholar

Lewontin, R. C. (2001). The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism and Environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lewontin, R. C., Rose, S., and Kamin, L. J. (1984). Not in Our Genes: Biology, Ideology, and Human Nature. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Lienau, E. K., DeSalle, R., Allard, M., et al. (2011). The mega-matrix tree of life: using genome-scale horizontal gene transfer and sequence evolution data as information about the vertical history of life. Cladistics 27, 417–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindberg, D. C. (2007). The Beginnings of Western Science: The European Scientific Tradition in Philosophical, Religious, and Institutional Context, Prehistory to A.D. 1450 (2nd edn.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the Best Explanation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lipton, P. (2008). Inference to the best explanation. In Psillos, S. and Curd, M. (Eds.) The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science. New York: Routledge, 193–202.Google Scholar

Livingstone, D. (2003). Putting Science in its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Livingstone, D. N. (2009). That Darwin destroyed natural theology. In Numbers, R. L. (Ed.) Galileo Goes to Jail and Other Myths About Science and Religion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 152–160.Google Scholar

Lombrozo, T. and Carey, S. (2006). Functional explanation and the function of explanation. Cognition 99, 167–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Long, J. (2012). Evolution, missing links and climate change: recent advances in understanding transformational macroevolution. In Poiani, A. (Ed.) Pragmatic Evolution: Applications of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 23–36.Google Scholar

Long, J. A., Young, G. C., Holland, T., Senden, T. J., and Fitzgerald, E. M. (2006). An exceptional Devonian fish from Australia sheds light on tetrapod origins. Nature 444, 199–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Losos, J. B. (2010). A tale of two radiations: similarities and differences in the evolutionary diversification of Darwin’s finches and Greater Antillean Anolis lizards. In Grant, P. R. and Grant, B. R. (Eds.) In Search of the Causes of Evolution: From Field Observations to Mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 309–331.Google Scholar

Love, A. C. (2002). Darwin and Cirripedia prior to 1846: exploring the origins of the barnacle research. Journal of the History of Biology 35, 251–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Love, A. C. (2013). Teaching evolutionary developmental biology: concepts, problems, and controversy. In Kampourakis, K. (Ed.) The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer, 323–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucas, J. R. (1979). Wilberforce and Huxley: a legendary encounter. The Historical Journal 22(2), 313–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lustig, A. J. (2009). Darwin’s difficulties. In Ruse, M. and Richards, R. J. (Eds.) The Cambridge Companion to the “Origin of Species.”Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 109–128.Google Scholar

Lyell, C. (1832). Principles of Geology, Vol. 2. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Macdougall, D. (2008). Nature’s Clocks: How Scientists Measure the Age of Almost Everything. San Diego, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Machamer, P., Darden, L., and Craver, C. F. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science 67(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mallet, J. (2008). Hybridization, ecological races, and the nature of species: empirical evidence for the ease of speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B Biological Sciences 363, 2971–2986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mallet, J., Meyer, A., Nosil, P., and Feder, J. L. (2009). Space, sympatry and speciation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22, 2332–2341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Margulis, L. (1998). Symbiotic Planet: A New Look at Evolution. London: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Margulis, L. and Sagan, D. (2002). Acquiring Genomes: A Theory of the Origins of Species. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Margulis, L. and Sagan, D. (2009). Endosymbiotic origin of eukaryotes. In Ruse, M. and Travis, J. (Eds.) Evolution: The First Four Billion Years. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 534–541.Google Scholar

Marshall, C. R. and Ward, P. D. (1996). Sudden and gradual molluscan extinctions in the latest Cretaceous of western European Tethys. Science 274(5291), 1360–1363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Matthen, M. and Ariew, A. (2002). Two ways of thinking about fitness and natural selection. Journal of Philosophy 99, 55–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maynard Smith, J. and Szathmáry, E. (1995). The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Maynard Smith, J. and Szathmáry, E. (2000). The Origins of Life: From the Birth of Life to the Origin of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mayr, E. (1961). Cause and effect in biology. Science 131, 1501–1506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayr, E. (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution and Inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Mayr, E. (2002). What Evolution Is. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar

McGhee, G. R. (2011). Convergent Evolution: Limited Forms Most Beautiful. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLaughlin, P. (2001). What Functions Explain: Functional Explanation and Self-Reproducing Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McMullin, E. (2008). The virtues of a good theory. In Psillos, S. and Curd, M. (Eds.) The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science. New York: Routledge, 498–508.Google Scholar

McShea, D. W. and Brandon, R. N. (2010). Biology’s First Law: The Tendency for Diversity and Complexity to Increase in Evolutionary Systems. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C. and Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of evolution. Science 313(5788), 765–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, K. (2007). Finding Darwin’s God: A Scientist’s Search for Common Ground Between God and Evolution. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar

Millstein, R. L. (2002). Are random drift and natural selection conceptually distinct?Biology & Philosophy 17 (1), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Millstein, R. L. (2005). Selection vs. drift: a response to Brandon’s reply. Biology & Philosophy 20(1), 171–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Millstein, R. L. (2013). Environmental ethics. In Kampourakis, K. (Ed.) The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer, 723–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Millstein, R. L., Skipper, R. A., and Dietrich, M. R. (2009). (Mis)interpreting mathematical models: drift as a physical process. Philosophy & Theory in Biology 1, e002, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mindell, D. P. (2007). The Evolving World: Evolution in Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Minelli, A. (2009). Forms of Becoming: The Evolutionary Biology of Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Minelli, A. (2010). Evolutionary developmental biology does not offer a significant challenge to the neo-Darwinian paradigm. In Ayala, F. J. and Arp, R. (Eds.) Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 213–226.Google Scholar

Minelli, A. (2011). Development, an open-ended segment of life. Biological Theory 6, 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minelli, A. and Fusco, G. (2012). On the evolutionary developmental biology of speciation. Evolutionary Biology 39, 242–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minelli, A. and Fusco, G. (2013). Homology. In Kampourakis, K. (Ed.) The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer, 289–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, D. S. (2002). The Dependent Gene: The Fallacy of “Nature vs. Nurture.”New York: Times Books/Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar

Moore, D. S. (2013). Current thinking about nature and nurture. In Kampourakis, K. (Ed.) The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer, 629–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, J. (2009). That evolution destroyed Charles Darwin’s faith in Christianity – until he reconverted on his deathbed. In, Numbers, R. L. (Ed.) Galileo Goes to Jail and Other Myths About Science and Religion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 142–151.Google Scholar

Moreira, D. and López-García, P. (2009). Ten reasons to exclude viruses from the tree of life. Nature Reviews Microbiology 7, 306–311.Google ScholarPubMed

Müller, G. B. (2007). Evo-devo: extending the evolutionary synthesis. Nature Reviews Genetics 8, 943–949.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Müller, G. B. (2008). Evo-devo as a discipline. In Minelli, A. and Fusco, G. (Eds.) Evolving Pathways: Key Themes in Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–29.Google Scholar

Müller, G. and Pigliucci, M. (Eds.) (2010). Evolution: The Extended Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Nersessian, N. J. (2008). Creating Scientific Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Numbers, R. (2006). The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Numbers, R. (2009a). That Creationism is a uniquely American phenomenon. In Numbers, R. (Ed.) Galileo Goes to Jail, and Other Myths About Science and Religion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 215–223.Google Scholar

Numbers, R. (Ed.) (2009b). Galileo Goes to Jail, and Other Myths About Science and Religion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Numbers, R. (2011). Clarifying Creationism: five common myths. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 33, 129–139.Google ScholarPubMed

O’Malley, M. A. (2012). When integration fails: prokaryote phylogeny and the tree of life. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, .

Officer, C. B. and Drake, C. L. (1985). Terminal cretaceous environmental events. Science 227(4691), 1161–1167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ogg, J. G., Ogg, G., and Gradstein, F. M. (2008). The Concise Geologic Time Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Okasha, S. (2002). Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Okasha, S. (2006). Evolution and the Levels of Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. (1996). Hume and the argument for biological design. Biology and Philosophy 11, 519–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ospovat, D. (1981). The Development of Darwin’s Theory: Natural History, Natural Theology and Natural Selection, 1838–1859. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Owen, R. (1860). [Review of Origin and other works.] Edinburgh Review 111, 487–532.

Pace, N. R. (2009). Mapping the tree of life: progress and prospects. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 73(4), 565–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Paley, W. (2006) [1802]. Natural Theology or Evidence of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearances of Nature. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Papadopulos, A. S. T., Baker, W. J., Crayn, D., et al. (2011). Speciation with gene flow on Lord Howe Island. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108, 13188–13193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Peeters, M., Courgnaud, V., Abela, B., et al. (2002). Risk to human health from a plethora of simian immunodeficiency viruses in primate bushmeat. Emerging Infectious Diseases 8, 451–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pennock, R. T. (2000). The Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1960) [1929]. The Child’s Conception of the World. Savage, MD: Littlefield, Adams, Patterson.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (2013) [1947]. La Représentation du Monde chez l’enfant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pigliucci, M. (2002). Denying Evolution: Creationism, Scientism, and the Nature of Science. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar

Pigliucci, M. (2008). Is evolvability evolvable?Nature Reviews Genetics 9, 75–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pigliucci, M. (2009). Phenotypic plasticity. In Müller, G. and Pigliucci, M. (Eds.) Evolution: The Extended Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 355–378.Google Scholar

Pigliucci, M. (2012). Answers for Aristotle: How Science and Philosophy Can Lead Us to a More Meaningful Life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Pigliucci, M. (2013). The nature of evolutionary biology: at the borderlands between historical and experimental science. In Kampourakis, K. (Ed.) The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pigliucci, M. and Boudry, M. (2011). Why machine-information metaphors are bad for science and science education. Science & Education 20, 453–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pigliucci, M. and Kaplan, J. (2006). Making Sense of Evolution: The Conceptual Foundations of Evolutionary Biology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pigliucci, M. and Müller, G. (Eds.) (2010). Evolution: The Extended Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poiani, A. (Ed.) (2012). Pragmatic Evolution: Applications of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., and Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education 66, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Potochnik, A. (2013). Biological explanation. In Kampourakis, K. (Ed.) The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer, 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prothero, D. R. (2007). Evolution: What the Fossils Say and Why it Matters. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Psillos, S. (2007). Philosophy of Science A–Z. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Ptacek, M. B. and Hankinson, S. J. (2009). The pattern and process of speciation. In Ruse, M. and Travis, J. (Eds.) Evolution: The First Four Billion Years. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 177–207.Google Scholar

Radick, G. (2009). Is the theory of natural selection independent of its history? In Hodge, J. and Radick, G. (Eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Darwin (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 147–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raff, R. A. (2000). Evo-devo: the evolution of a new discipline. Nature Reviews Genetics 1, 74–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Raff, R. A. (2007). Written in stone: fossils, genes, and evo-devo. Nature Reviews Genetics 8, 911–920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rambaut, A., Posada, D., Crandall, K. A., and Holmes, E. C. (2004). The causes and consequences of HIV evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics 5, 52–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ravetz, J. R. (1996). The Copernican revolution. In Olby, R. C., Cantor, G. N., Christie, J. R. R., and Hodge, M. J. S. (Eds.) Companion to the History of Modern Science. London and New York: Routledge, 201–216.Google Scholar

Reeve, H. K. and Sherman, P. W. (1993). Adaptation and the goals of evolutionary research. Quarterly Review of Biology 68(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reiss, J. O. (2009). Not by Design: Retiring Darwin’s Watchmaker. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Restif, O. (2009). Evolutionary epidemiology 20 years on: challenges and prospects. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 9(1), 108–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Reuter, M. A., Pecora, N. D., Harding, C. V., Canaday, D. H., and McDonald, D. (2010). Mycobacterium tuberculosis promotes HIV trans-infection and suppresses MHC-II antigen processing by dendritic cells. Journal of Virology 84(17), 8549–8560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Richards, R. A. (2010). The Species Problem: A Philosophical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richards, R. J. (1992). The Meaning of Evolution: The Morphological Construction and Ideological Reconstruction of Darwin’s Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roger, A. J., Sandblom, O., Doolittle, W. F., and Philippe, H. (1999). An evaluation of elongation – factor-1α as a phylogenetic marker for eukaryotes. Molecular Biology Evolution 16(2), 218–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rogers, A. R. (2011). The Evidence for Evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rokas, A. and Carroll, S. B. (2006). Bushes in the Tree of Life. PLoS Biology 4, e352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rosenberg, A. (2005). Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction (2nd edn.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, A. and McShea, D. W. (2008). Philosophy of Biology: A Contemporary Introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Rosengren, K. S., Gelman, S. A., Kalish, C. W., and McCormick, M. (1991). As time goes by: children’s early understanding of growth in animals. Child Development 62(6), 1302–1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosengren, K. S., Brem, S. K., Evans, E. M., and Sinatra, G. M. (Eds.) (2012). Evolution Challenges: Integrating Research and Practice in Teaching and Learning About Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rughinis, C. (2011). A lucky answer to a fair question: conceptual, methodological, and moral implications of including items on human evolution in scientific literacy surveys. Science Communication 33(4), 499–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruse, M. (1975a). Charles Darwin and artificial selection. Journal of the History of Ideas 36(2), 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruse, M. (1975b). Darwin’s debt to philosophy: an examination of the influence of the philosophical ideas of John F.W. Herschel and William Whewell on the development of Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 6, 159–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ruse, M. (1999). Mystery of Mysteries: Is Evolution a Social Construction?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ruse, M. (2000). Darwin and the philosophers: epistemological factors in the development and reception of the Origin of Species. In Creath, R. and Maienschein, J. (Eds.) Biology and Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–26.Google Scholar

Ruse, M. (2001). Can a Darwinian be a Christian? The Relationship between Science and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ruse, M. (2004). The argument from design: a brief history. In Dembski, W.A. and Ruse, M. (Eds.) Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruse, M. (2005).The Evolution/Creation Struggle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruse, M. (2009). Monad to Man: The Concept of Progress in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ruse, M. (2010). Science and Spirituality: Making Room for Faith in the Age of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruse, M. (2012). Science and the humanities: Stephen Jay Gould’s quest to join the high table. Science & Education 22(9), 2317–2326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruse, M. (Ed.) (2013). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Darwin and Evolutionary Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruse, M. and Richards, R. J. (Eds.) (2009). The Cambridge Companion to the “Origin of Species.”Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ruse, M. and Travis, J. (Eds.) (2009). Evolution: The First Four Billion Years. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Salmon, W. C. (1984). Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Salmon, W. C. (1989). Four decades of scientific explanation. In Kitcher, P. and Salmon, W. C. (Eds.) Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 13. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 3–219.Google Scholar

Sansom, R. S., Gabbott, S. E., and Purnell, M. A. (2010). Non-random decay of chordate characters causes bias in fossil interpretation. Nature 463, 797–800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sarkar, S. (2007). Doubting Darwin? Creationist Designs on Evolution. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sato, A., Tichy, H., O’Huigin, C., Grant, P. R., Grant, B. R., and Klein, J. (2001). On the origin of Darwin’s finches. Molecular Biology and Evolution 18(3), 299–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schweber, S. S. (1980). Darwin and the political economists: divergence of character. Journal of the History of Biology 13(2), 195–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Scriven, M. (1959). Explanation and prediction in evolutionary theory. Science 130, 477–482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Scriven, M. (1969). Explanation in biological sciences. Journal of the History of Biology 2(1), 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sears, K. E., Behringer, R. R., Rasweiler, J. J., and Niswander, L. A. (2006). Development of bat flight: morphologic and molecular evolution of bat wing digits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103(17), 6581–6586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Secord, J. A. (1985). Darwin and the breeders: a social history. In Kohn, D. (Ed.) The Darwinian Heritage. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 519–542.Google Scholar

Secord, J. A. (2000). Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication, Reception, and Secret Authorship of Vestiges on Natural History of Creation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Sereno, P. C. (2005). The logical basis of phylogenetic taxonomy. Systematic Biology 54(4), 595–619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shapin, S. (1996). The Scientific Revolution. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shtulman, A. (2006). Qualitative differences between naive and scientific theories of evolution. Cognitive Psychology 52, 170–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shtulman, A. and Schulz, L. (2008). The relationship between essentialist beliefs and evolutionary reasoning. Cognitive Science 32, 1049–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shubin, N. (2008). Your Inner Fish: The Amazing Discovery of our 375-Million-Year-Old Ancestor. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Shubin, N. H., Daeschler, E. B., and Jenkins, F. A. (2006). The pectoral fin of Tiktaalik roseae and the origin of the tetrapod limb. Nature 440, 764–771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shubin, N., Tabin, C., and Carroll, S. (2009). Deep homology and the origins of evolutionary novelty. Nature 457, 818–823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., and Demastes, W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students’ understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40(5), 510–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skipper, R. A. (2006). Stochastic evolutionary dynamics: drift versus draft. Philosophy of Science 73(5), 655–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skoglund, P., Götherström, A., and Jakobsson, M. (2011). Estimation of population divergence times using non-overlapping genomic sequences: examples from dogs and wolves. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28(4), 1505–1517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Smit, J. and Hertogen, J. (1980). An extraterrestrial event at the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary. Nature 285, 198–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, M. U. (2010). Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: II. Pedagogical issues. Science & Education 19(6), 539–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sober, E. (1993) [1984]. The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Sober, E. (1997). Two outbreaks of lawlessness in recent philosophy of biology. Philosophy of Science 64(4), 467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sober, E. (2003, November 30). Contingency or inevitability? What would happen if the evolutionary tape were replayed? A review of Simon Conway Morris’s life’s solution – inevitable humans in a lonely universe. New York Times.

Sober, E. (2007). What is wrong with Intelligent Design?Quarterly Review of Biology 82(1), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed