Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 November 2020
Abstract
In-depth interviews of the Umbrella Movement's “committed occupiers” show that many of them were not veteran activists that had prepared for civil disobedience. Many of them were provoked into action by what they perceived to be undue police violence. Their anger allowed them to overcome the threshold of participation. The spontaneous nature of their participation partly explains the amorphous form of the movement, which had little centralized leadership, and some of their ambivalent attitudes concerning the movement's direction. However, the movement was a major experience of political awakening for many of these participants, which should create a new micro-cohort of participants for future movements.
Keywords: threshold for participation, political awakening, Umbrella Movement, political participation, biographical availability, Hong Kong protests
Introduction
The Umbrella Movement of 2014 was special in more ways than one. Despite the detailed planning and dragged-out deliberations surrounding the original Occupying Central with Love and Peace (OCLP) movement, the occupation movement broke out in a somewhat unexpected manner. The occupation movement did not take place at the originally scheduled time and site, but in a mostly spontaneous manner in reaction to police and government actions. This spontaneity meant that a large number of participants were not originally OCLP followers, although they might be largely sympathetic toward the democratic cause.
This paper, based on interviews in November 2014 with more than 50 committed occupiers at the three different occupation sites, seeks to explore and analyze the backgrounds and views of the participants of the Umbrella Movement. It shows that many committed occupiers had no prior plans to join the OCLP movement, and were not frequent participants in past pro-democracy activities. Police brutality was the chief provocation for their choice to join the movement. This more or less explained some of their behaviors and predispositions during the occupation: many of them were NOT followers of traditional or mainstream pro-democracy parties, so the appeals of party politicians had little influence on them or on the course of the movement. Many were relative newcomers to the democracy movement, which partly explained their mode of action and political inclinations. Despite their bold action of civil disobedience, they showed a fair degree of optimism about how the movement would end.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.