Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T12:46:16.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Short-rate models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2015

Daragh McInerney
Affiliation:
AGH University of Science and Technology, Krakow
Tomasz Zastawniak
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access

Summary

We need to choose a quantity to serve as a state variable that determines the interest rate term structure and its evolution in time. The first generation of stochastic interest rate models use the instantaneous short rate as the state variable. The two key advantages of short-rate models are their general simplicity and the fact that they often lead to analytic formulae for bonds and associated vanilla options. The tractability of short-rate models means that the price of a given derivative can often be computed quickly, important in situations where a large number of securities need to be valued. Indeed, throughout this chapter, we focus on short-rate models that allow discount bonds to be priced in closed form.

One-factor models assume that the entire interest rate term structure is driven by a one-dimensional Wiener process. Such models are usually suitable when pricing securities that depend on a single rate only, but for more complex products which depend on two or more different rates we may need to move to a multi-factor model driven by multi-dimensional Brownian motion. In the final section we present one of the most popular multi-factor short-rate models, the two-factor Hull–White model.

A weakness of the short-rate approach is that the instantaneous short rate is a mathematical idealisation rather than something that can be observed directly in the market. In the past decade, short-rate models have, to some extent, been superseded by the LIBOR market model (covered in Chapter 5), in which the stochastic state variable is a set of benchmark forward LIBOR rates. Nonetheless, short-rate models are particularly useful and remain popular due to their analytic tractability.

We continue to work under Assumption 2.1, which stipulates the existence of a probability measure Q (the risk-neutral measure) equivalent to P such that the value of any security discounted by the money market account is a martingale under Q.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×