Allende, Salvador. Mensaje al Congreso Nacional. Santiago, Chile, 1971.Google Scholar

Amin, Samir. Accumulation on a World Scale: A Critique of the Theory of Underdevelopment. Translated by Pearce, Brian. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Baer, Werner and Love, Joseph L., “Brazil’s EMBRAER: Institutional Entrepreneurship.” In Brazil’s Economy: An Institutional and Sectoral Approach, eds. Bauer, Werner et al., London: Routledge, 2017: 119–135.Google Scholar

Baer, Werner and Love, Joseph L., eds. Liberalization and its Consequences: A Comparative Perspective on Latin America and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bértola, Luis and Ocampo, José Antonio. The Economic Development of Latin America since Independence. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourguignon, François. The Globalization of Inequality. Translated by Railton, Thomas Scott. Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Bulmer-Thomas, Victor, Coatsworth, John, and Cortes-Conde, Roberto, eds. Cambridge History of Latin America. Vol. 2: The Long Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Cano, Wilson. “Instituto de Economia da Unicamp: Notas Sobre sua Origem e Linhas Gerais de sua Evolução.” In Ensaios de História do Pensamento Econômico no Brasil Contemporâneo, eds. Szmrecsányi, Tamás and Da Silva Coelho, Francisco, São Paulo: Atlas, 2007: 199–209.Google Scholar

Cárdenas, Enrique, Ocampo, José Antonio, and Thorp, Rosemary, eds. An Economic History of Twentieth-Century Latin America. Vol. 3: Industrialization and the State in Latin America: The Postwar Years. New York: Palgrave, 2000.Google Scholar

Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. Empresário Industrial e Desenvolvimento Econômico no Brasil. São Paulo: Difusão Européia do Livro, 1964.Google Scholar

CELAM. “II Conferencia General del Episcopado Latinoamericano. Documentos Finales de Medellin.” 2017 www.celam.org/doc_conferencias/Documento_Conclusivo_Medellin.pdf (accessed December 2, 2017).Google Scholar

Coatsworth, John H. and Williamson, Jeffrey G.. “Always Protectionist? Latin American Tariffs from Independence to the Great Depression.” Journal of Latin American Studies, May , 2014: 205–232.Google Scholar

David, Thomas. Nationalisme économique et industrialization: L’expérience des pays de l’Est (1789–1939). Genève: Librairie Droz, 2009.Google Scholar

Dosman, Edgar J. The Life and Times of Raúl Prebisch. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC; Fernando Fajnzylber, principal author). Changing Production Patterns with Social Equity. Santiago, Chile: United Nations, 1990.Google Scholar

Fajnzylber, Fernando. La industrialización trunca de América Latina. México, DF: Nueva Imagen, 1983.Google Scholar

Fajnzylber, Fernando. “Industrialización en América Latina: De la ‘caja negra’ al ‘casillero vacío.’ Comparación de patrones contemporáneos de industrialización.” Cuadernos de la CEPAL No. 60. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas – CEPAL, 1990. https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/27955 (accessed April 25, 2018).Google Scholar

Fernandez, Joaquin. “Neoestructuralismo y política económica: Entrevista a Osvaldo Sunkel.” Revista de Actualidad Política, Social y Cultural. 2011. www.redseca.cl/?p=2015 (accessed December 3, 2017).Google Scholar

Filippo, Armando di. Desarrollo y desigualdad social en la América Latina. México, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1981.Google Scholar

Filippo, Armando di. “La visión centro-periferia hoy.” Revista de la CEPAL, número extraordinario, October 1998: 175–185.Google Scholar

Foxley, Alejandro. Distribución del Ingreso. México, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1974.Google Scholar

Foxley, Alejandro and Óscar, Muñoz. “Redistribución del Ingreso, Crecimiento Económico y Estructura Social (El caso chileno).” El Trimestre Económico 40, 160(4): 905–936, Octubre–Diciembre 1973.Google Scholar

Franco, Rolando. “História del ILPES (1962–2012).” Unpublished manuscript. 2015.Google Scholar

Furtado, Celso. Diagnosis of the Brazilian Crisis. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1965. [Portuguese original: Dialéctica do desenvolvimento, 1964.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furtado, Celso. A Fantasia Desfeita. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1989.Google Scholar

Furtado, Celso. Letter to Love, Joseph L.. Author’s possession, Rio de Janeiro. August 8, 1996.Google Scholar

Graham, Lawrence. Civil Service Reform in Brazil: Principles versus Practice. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Helpman, Elhanan. The Mystery of Economic Growth. Harvard: Belknap, 2004.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O. Journeys Toward Progress: Studies of Economic Policy-making in Latin America. New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 1963.Google Scholar

Hopkins, Jack W. “Evolution and Revolution: Enduring Patterns and the Transformation of Latin American Bureaucracy.” In Handbook of Comparative and Development Public Administration, ed. Farazmand, Ali, New York: Marcel Dekker, 1991: 705–706.Google Scholar

Hopkins, Jack W. “Contemporary Research on Public Administration and Bureaucracies in Latin America.” LARR (IX, 1), Spring 1974.Google Scholar

Instituto Latinoamericano de Planificación Económica y Social (ILPES), “Programa de Capacitación 1963 [through 1969].” ILPES Archive, CEPAL, 1969.Google Scholar

Instituto Latinoamericano de Planificación Económica y Social (ILPES), Discusiones sobre Planificación: Informe de un seminario. Santiago, 6–14 de Julio de 1965. México: Siglo XXI, 1990 (1st edn. 1976).Google Scholar

Kubitschek, Juscelino. Mensagem ao Congresso Nacional: 1956. Rio de Janeiro: Imprensa Nacional, 1956.Google Scholar

Larrain, Felipe and Selowsky, Marcelo, eds. The Public Sector and the Latin American Crisis. San Francisco, CA: ICS Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Leiva, Fernando Ignacio. Latin American Neostructuralism: The Contradictions of Post-Neoliberal Development. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Love, Joseph L. “The Origins of Dependency Analysis.” Journal of Latin American Studies 22, 1: 143–168, February 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Love, Joseph L. Crafting the Third World: Theorizing Development in Romania and Brazil. Stanford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Love, Joseph L. “Structuralism and Dependency in Peripheral Europe: Latin American Ideas in Spain and Portugal.” Latin American Research Review 39, 2, June 2004: 114–139.Google Scholar

Love, Joseph L. “Institutional Foundations of Economic Ideas in Latin America, 1914–1950.” In Economic Doctrines in Latin America: Origins, Embedding and Evolution, eds. Thorp, Rosemary and Fitzgerald, Valpy, Houndmills, UK: Palgrave, 2005: 142–156.Google Scholar

Love, Joseph L. “Flux and Reflux: Interwar and Postwar Structuralist Theories of Development in Romania and Latin America.” In History and Culture of Economic Nationalism in East-Central Europe, eds. Helga Schultz and Eduard Kubu, Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2006: 71–86. “Latin America, UNCTAD, and the Postwar Trading System.” In Economic Development in Latin America: Essays in Honor of Werner Baer, eds. Esfahani, Hadi Salehi, Facchini, Giovanni, and Hewings, Geoffrey, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010: 22–33.Google Scholar

Montecinos, Veronica. “Economists in Political and Policy Elites in Latin America.” In The Post-1945 Internationalization of Economics, ed. Coats, A. W. Durham: Duke University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Nye, Joseph S. “UNCTAD: Poor Nations’ Pressure Group.” In The Anatomy of Influence: Decision Making in International Organizations, eds. Cox, Robert W. and Karan, Jacobson Harold, New Haven, Connecticut, 1973: 334.Google Scholar

Ocampo, José Antonio and Parra, María Ángela. “Returning to An Eternal Debate: The Terms of Trade for Commodities in the Twentieth Century.” CEPAL, series Informes y estudios especiales 5, 2003: 1–56.Google Scholar

Packenham, Robert A. The Dependency Movement: Scholarship and Politics in Development Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Pinto, Aníbal. “Naturaleza e implicaciones de la ‘heterogeneidad estructural’ de la América Latina.” El Trimestre Económico 37, 1, 145, 1970: 83–100.Google Scholar

Pinto, Aníbal. América Latina: una visión estructuralista. México, DF: UNAM, 1991 [1974].Google Scholar

Porcile, Gabriel. “La teoría estructuralista del desarrollo.” In El desarrollo inclusivo en América Latina y el Caribe: Ensayos sobre políticas de convergencia productiva para la igualdad, ed. Infante, Ricardo, Santiago: CEPAL, 2011: 31–64.Google Scholar

Prado, Eleuterio F. S. “A ortodoxia neoclássica.” USP: Estudos Avançados 15, 41, January/April 2001.Google Scholar

Prebisch, Raúl. Towards a Dynamic Development Policy for Latin America. New York: United Nations, 1963.Google Scholar

Prebisch, Raúl. Towards a New Trade Policy for Development. New York: UNCTAD, 1964.Google Scholar

Prebisch, Raúl. Towards a Global Strategy of Development. New York: UNCTAD, 1968.Google Scholar

Presidência da República [Celso Furtado, principal author]. Plano trienal de desenvolvimento econômico e social: 1963–1965 (Síntese). Rio: n. pub, December 1962.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, Octavio. El Estructuralismo latinoamericano. México, DF: Siglo XXI and CEPAL, 2006.Google Scholar

Stiglitz, Joseph E. The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future. New York: Norton, 2013.Google Scholar

Sunkel, Osvaldo and Zuleta, Gustavo. “Neostructuralism vs. Neoliberalism in the 1990s.” CEPAL Review 42: 35–52, 1990.Google Scholar

Szlajfer, Henryk. Economic Nationalism in East-Central Europe and South America (1918–1939). Genève: Librairie Droz, 1990.Google Scholar

Thirion, Gerard. “The Birth of PREALC (1968–1973).” In PREALC: 25 Years. Santiago: International Labour Organization, 1993.Google Scholar

Thorp, Rosemary. Progress, Poverty, and Exclusion: An Economic History of Latin America in the Twentieth Century. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, 1998.Google Scholar

Thurber, Clarence E., Boeninger, Edgardo and Graham, Lawrence S., eds. Development Administration in Latin America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

United Nations. Economic Development in Selected Countries: Plans, Programmes and Agencies. Lake Success, NY: UN Department of Economic Affairs, 1947.Google Scholar

Bravo, Pedro Vuskovic. “Distribucion del ingreso y opciones del desarrollo.” In Desarrollo latinoamericano: Ensayos críticos, ed. Serra, José. Mexico, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1974: 51–74.Google Scholar

Wahrlich, Beatriz M. de Souza. Reforma administrativa na era de Vargas. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getúlio Vargas, 1983.Google Scholar

Whitehead, Laurence. “State Organization in Latin America since 1930.” In Cambridge History of Latin America, Vol. VI, Part 2, ed. Bethell, Leslie, Cambridge University Press, 1994: 1–96.Google Scholar

Williamson, Jeffrey G. Trade and Poverty: When the Third World Fell Behind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Woods, Ngaire. The Globalizers: The IMF, the World Bank, and their Borrowers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Ricardo, Bielschowsky. “Cincuenta años del pensamiento de la CEPAL: una reseña.” In Cincuenta años del pensamiento de la CEPAL: textos seleccionados. Vol. I, eds. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe / Naciones Unidas, Santiago: CEPAL and Fondo de Cultura Economica, 1998: 9–61.Google Scholar

Ricardo, Bielschowsky. “Sesenta Años de la CEPAL y el pensamiento reciente.” In Sesenta años de la CEPAL: Textos seleccionados del decenio 1998–2008, ed. Ricardo, Bielschowsky, Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno/CEPAL, 2010: 15–89.Google Scholar

Brown, Jonathan C. “Introduction, From Structuralism to the New Institutional Economics: A Half-Century of Latin American Economic Historiography.” Latin American Research Review 40:3, 2005: 97–99.Google Scholar

Coatsworth, John H. “Structures, Endowments, and Institutions in the Economic History of Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 40, 3, 2005, 126–144.Google Scholar

Kuntz Ficker, Sandra. “From Structuralism to the New Institutional Economics: The Impact of Theory on the Study of Foreign Trade in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 40, 3, 2005: 145–162.Google Scholar

Love, Joseph L. “The Rise and Decline of Economic Structuralism in Latin America: New Dimensions.” Latin American Research Review 40, 3, 2005: 100–125.Google Scholar

Love, Joseph L. “Brazilian Structuralism.” In Amann, Edmund, Carlos, Azzoni, and Bauer, Werner, The Oxford Handbook of the Brazilian Economy. Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar