Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T13:20:56.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - SOME CHARACTERISTICS OF THE OVERRULING AND OVERRULED CASES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

Saul Brenner
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina
Harold J. Spaeth
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Get access

Summary

In this chapter we will attempt to ascertain some of the characteristics of the overruling and overruled cases. Although we will mainly examine the overruling and overruled cases themselves, at times we will also compare these cases with the non-overruling and the non-overruled cases. We will both present descriptive data and test hypotheses.

THE AGES OF THE OVERRULED PRECEDENTS

As we indicated in Chapter 2, Ulmer discovered that the Supreme Court's 11- to 20-year-old decisions were more likely to be overruled than those of any other age. He also found that only 3 percent of the overturned precedents exceeded 95 years of age. Blaustein and Field, whose study covered the Court through the 1956 term, found that the mean life-span of overruled cases was 24 years and the median life-span was 17 years.

We inspected the ages of the 154 overruled precedents of our study and discovered that the most frequently overruled decisions were 0 to 10 years old (26.6 percent), followed by those decided 11 to 20 years previously (23.4 percent). (See Table 4.1.) In other words, half the overruled decisions survived less than 21 years. (Ulmer's comparable proportion is 64 percent.) We also found that 6.4 percent of the overturned cases (10 cases) were over 90 years old. (Ulmer's comparable figure is 3 percent, or 3 cases.)

The conventional wisdom does not specify an age at which precedents become sacrosanct. Nonetheless, we certainly feel safe in assuming that cases decided in the nineteenth century and earlier qualify in this regard. Inspection of the list of overruled decisions in Appendix I shows that slightly more than 10 percent of them predate 1900 (16 of 154).

Type
Chapter
Information
Stare Indecisis
The Alteration of Precedent on the Supreme Court, 1946–1992
, pp. 29 - 48
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×