Account of the Terrific and Fatal Riot at the New-York Astor Place Opera House … (New York: H. M. Ranney, 1849).Google Scholar

Acker, Faith, ‘John Benson’s 1640 Poems and Its Literary Precedents’, in Depledge, and Kirwan, (eds.), Canonising Shakespeare.Google Scholar

Adams, W. E., Memoirs of a Social Atom, 2 vols. (London: Hutchinson, 1903).Google Scholar

Advertisement for Howard Staunton’s facsimile edition of F1, Publishers’ Weekly, 8 December 1863: 752.Google Scholar

Advertisement for Joseph Dennie’s edition of Shakespeare, Port Folio, 4/6 (11 February 1804): 46–7.Google Scholar

Advertisement for ‘Mr. Knight’s Editions of Shakspere’, Quarterly Literary Advertiser, December 1842: 79.Google Scholar

Advertising leaflet for the Warwick Shakespeare ([London: Blackie & Sons], n.d.).Google Scholar

Alden, John, ‘Pills and Publishing: Some Notes on the English Book Trade, 1660–1715’, Lib., 5th series, 7 (1952): 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, Catherine M. S., ‘Province of Pirates: The Editing and Publication of Shakespeare’s Poems in the Eighteenth Century’, in Gondris, (ed.), Reading Readings, 345–65.Google Scholar

Alexander, Peter, Shakespeare’s ‘Henry VI’’ and ‘Richard III’ (Cambridge University Press, 1929).Google Scholar

Allentuck, Marcia, ‘Sir Thomas Hanmer Instructs Francis Hayman: An Editor’s Notes to His Illustrator’, SQ, 27(1976): 288–315.Google Scholar

Altick, Richard, The Cowden Clarkes (Oxford University Press, 1948).Google Scholar

Altick, Richard, The English Common Reader: A Social History of the Mass Reading Public 1800–1900 (University of Chicago Press, 1957).Google Scholar

Altick, Richard, ‘From Aldine to Everyman: Cheap Reprint Series of the English Classics 1830–1906’, SB, 11 (1958): 3–24.Google Scholar

Amory, Hugh and Hall, David D., A History of the Book in America. I: The Colonial Book in the Atlantic World (Cambridge: American Antiquarian Society/Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Announcement regarding Pope’s edition, The Weekly Journal, or Saturday Evening Post, no. 155 (Saturday 18 November 1721): 927.Google Scholar

Announcement regarding Pope’s edition, The Evening Post, no. 1992 (3–5 May 1722), third page.Google Scholar

Announcement regarding Rowe’s edition, The London Gazette, no. 4523 (Monday 14 March to Thursday 17 March 1708), verso.Google Scholar

Arber, Edward (ed.), A Transcript of the Registers of the Company of Stationers of London; 1554–1640, 5 vols. (London: privately printed, 1875–94).Google Scholar

Arrowsmith, W. R., Shakespeare’s Editors and Commentators (London: J. Russell Smith, 1865).Google Scholar

Astbury, Raymond, ‘The Renewal of the Licensing Act in 1693 and Its Lapse in 1695’, Lib., 5th series, 33 (1978): 296–322.Google Scholar

Atto, Clayton, ‘The Society for the Encouragement of Learning’, Lib., 4th series, 19 (1938): 263–88.Google Scholar

Baker, William and Womack, Kenneth (eds.), Twentieth-Century British Book Collectors and Bibliographers (Detroit: Gale, 1999).Google Scholar

Bald, R. C., ‘Early Copyright Litigation and Its Bibliographical Interest’, PBSA, 36 (1942): 81–96.Google Scholar

Barclay, Tom, Memoirs and Medleys: The Autobiography of a Bottle Washer (Coalville, Leicestershire: Coalville Publishing, 1995; originally published Leicester: Edgar Backus, 1934)Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland, ‘The Death of the Author’, in Heath, Stephen (ed. and trans.), Image Music Text (London: Fontana, 1977), 142–8.Google Scholar

Bate, Jonathan, ‘The RSC Complete Works Festival: An Introduction and Retrospective’, Shakespeare, 3/2 (August 2007): 183–8.Google Scholar

Beaumont, Francis and Fletcher, John, Comedies and Tragedies (London, 1647).Google Scholar

Beaumont, Francis and Fletcher, John, Fifty Comedies and Tragedies (London: for John Martyn, Henry Herringman, Richard Marriot, 1679).Google Scholar

Belanger, Terry, ‘Tonson, Wellington and the Shakespeare Copyrights’, Studies in the Book Trade in Honour of Graham Pollard (Oxford: Bibliographical Society, 1975): 195–209.Google Scholar

Belanger, Terry, ‘Publishers and Writers in Eighteenth-Century England’, in Rivers, Isabel (ed.), Books and Their Readers in Eighteenth-Century England (Leicester University Press, 1982), 5–25.Google Scholar

Bell, Edward, George Bell, Publisher: A Brief Memoir (London: Chiswick Press, 1924).Google Scholar

Bennett, Scott, ‘John Murray’s Family Library and the Cheapening of Books in Early Nineteenth Century Britain’, SB, 29 (1976): 138–66.Google Scholar

Benzie, William, Dr. F. J. Furnivall: Victorian Scholar Adventurer (Norman, OK: Pilgrim, 1983).Google Scholar

Berek, Peter, ‘The Market for Playbooks and the Development of the Reading Public’, Philological Quarterly, 91/2 (2012): 151–84.Google Scholar

Berger, Thomas L., ‘The Second Quarto of Othello and the Question of Textual “Authority”’, AEB, n.s., 2/4 (1988): 141–59.Google Scholar

Bernard, Stephen, ‘Henry Herringman, Jacob Tonson and John Dryden: The Creation of the Modern Publisher’, Notes and Queries, 62 (2015): 274–7.Google Scholar

Bernard, Stephen, (ed.), The Literary Correspondences of the Tonsons (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Bernard, Thomas, Of the Education of the Poor; Being the first part of a digest of the reports of the Society for Bettering the Condition of the Poor: and containing a selection of those articles which have a reference to education (London: for the Society, 1809).Google Scholar

Best, Michael, ‘Shakespeare and the Electronic Text’, in Murphy, (ed.), Concise Companion, pp. 145–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Best, Michael, ‘Shakespeare and the Electronic Text’, in Murphy, ‘The Internet Shakespeare Editions: Scholarly Shakespeare on the Web’, Shakespeare, 4/3 (2008): 221–33.Google Scholar

Best, Michael, ‘Shakespeare and the Electronic Text’, in Murphy, ‘Standing in a Rich Place: Electrifying the Multiple-Text Edition or, Every Text is Multiple’, College Literature, 36/1 (Winter 2009): 26–39.Google Scholar

Bevington, David, ‘Determining the Indeterminate: The Oxford Shakespeare’, SQ, 38/4 (1987): 501–19.Google Scholar

Black, Joseph L. (ed.), The Martin Marprelate Tracts: A Modernized and Annotated Edition (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Black, N. W. and Shaaber, Matthias, Shakespeare’s Seventeenth-Century Editors, 1632–1685 (New York: MLA, 1937).Google Scholar

Blagden, Cyprian, ‘Booksellers’ Trade Sales 1718–1768’, Lib., 5th series, 5 (1950–1): 243–57.Google Scholar

Blagden, Cyprian, ‘Notes on the Ballad Market in the Second Half of the Seventeenth Century’, SB, 6 (1954): 160–80.Google Scholar

Blayney, Peter W. M., The Texts of King Lear and Their Origins, vol. I (Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Blayney, Peter W. M., The Bookshops in Paul’s Cross Churchyard (London: Bibliographical Society, 1990).Google Scholar

Blayney, Peter W. M., The First Folio of Shakespeare (Washington, DC: Folger Shakespeare Library, 1991).Google Scholar

Blayney, Peter W. M., ‘The Publication of Playbooks’, in Cox, John D. and Kastan, David Scott (eds.), A New History of Early English Drama (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997): 383–422.Google Scholar

Blayney, Peter W. M., Letter to the Editor of The Library, 7th series, 1/1 (2000): 72–4. See also responses from Henry L. Snyder and M. J. Crump and from David McKitterick at pp. 75–8 of the same issue.Google Scholar

Blayney, Peter W. M., ‘The Alleged Popularity of Playbooks’, SQ, 56 (2005): 33–50.Google Scholar

Blayney, Peter W. M., The Stationers’ Company and the Printers of London, 1501–1557, 2 vols. (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Boase, T. S. R., ‘Illustrations of Shakespeare’s Plays in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 10 (1947): 83–103.Google Scholar

Bolton, C. K., The Harvard University Library (Cambridge, MA, 1894).Google Scholar

Bolton, Whitney, ‘The Bard in Bits: Electronic Editions of Shakespeare and Programs to Analyze Them’, C&H, 24/4 (August 1990): 275–87.Google Scholar

Boulton, Jeremy, ‘Wage Labour in Seventeenth-Century London’, Economic History Review, 49/2 (1996): 268–90.Google Scholar

Bourus, Terri, ‘The Good Enough Quarto: Hamlet as a Material Object’, Critical Survey, 31/1–2 (Spring–Summer 2019): 73–86.Google Scholar

Bourus, Terri, (guest ed.), ‘Canonizing Q1 Hamlet’, special issue of Critical Survey, 31/1–2 (Spring–Summer 2019).Google Scholar

Bourus, Terri and Taylor, Gary (eds.), The Creation and Re-Creation of Cardenio: Performing Shakespeare, Transforming Cervantes (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).Google Scholar

Bowdler, Thomas, A Letter to the Editor of the ‘British Critic’; occasioned by the censure pronounced in that work … (London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme and Brown, 1823).Google Scholar

[Bowdler, Thomas, nephew of Thomas Bowdler the editor], Memoir of the late John Bowdler, Esq., to which is added some account of the late Thomas Bowdler, Esq. editor of the Family Shakspeare (London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green, 1825).Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson, On Editing Shakespeare and the Elizabethan Dramatists (Philadelphia: Rosenbach Foundation/University of Pennsylvania Library, 1955).Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson, Review of the Yale facsimile of F1, Modern Philology, 53 (1955): 50–7.Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson, Review of Shakespeare Quarto Facsimiles 9 and 10, MLR, 53 (1958): 235–6.Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson, The Bibliographical Way (Lawrence: University of Kansas Libraries, 1959).Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson, ‘Today’s Shakespeare Texts, and Tomorrow’s’, SB, 19 (1966): 39–65.Google Scholar

Bradbrook, Muriel, Review of the Heritage Press edition of Peter Alexander’s text, SQ, 10/2 (1959): 229–30.Google Scholar

[Brae, A. E.], writing as ‘A Detective’, Literary Cookery (London: John Russell Smith, 1855).Google Scholar

Braunmuller, A. R., ‘Shakespeares Various’, in Thompson, Ann and McMullan, Gordon (eds.), In Arden: Editing Shakespeare (London: Thomson, 2003): 3–16.Google Scholar

Bristol, Michael D., ‘Henry Clay Folger, Jr.’, in DiPietro, Cary (ed.), Bradley, Greg, Folger, Great Shakespeareans 9 (London: Continuum, 2011): 114–75.Google Scholar

Brome, Richard, Five New Plays (London: Printed for A. Crook, 1659).Google Scholar

Brooks, Douglas A., From Playhouse to Printing House: Drama and Authorship in Early Modern England (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Brown, A. D. J., ‘The little fellow has done wonders’, Cambridge Quarterly, 21 (1992): 120–49.Google Scholar

Brown, Arthur, ‘Editorial Problems in Shakespeare: Semi–Popular Editions’, SB, 8 (1956): 16–27.Google Scholar

Brown, Arthur, ‘Studies in Elizabethan Drama since 1900’, SS, 14 (1961): 1–14.Google Scholar

Bryce, J. C., ‘Peter Alexander, 1893–1969’, PBA, 66 (1980): 378–405.Google Scholar

Bunbury, Sir Henry (ed.), Correspondence of Sir Thomas Hanmer, Bart (London: Moxon, 1838).Google Scholar

Burnim, Kalman A. and Highfill, Philip H. Jr., John Bell, Patron of British Theatrical Portraiture: A Catalog of the Theatrical Portraits in His Editions of Bell’s Shakespeare and Bell’s British Theatre (Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Burton, Dolores M., ‘“Respice Finem” and “Tantum Quantum”: An Essay Review of Computational Stylistics for 1967–1968’, C&H, 3/1 (September 1968): 41–8.Google Scholar

Byrne, M. St Clare, ‘Bell’s Shakespeare’, TLS, 31 January 1948: 65.Google Scholar

Calarco, Joe, review of Macbeth CD-ROM, Theatre Journal, 48/4 (December 1996): 529–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, William J., A Bibliography in Short-Title Catalog Form of Bell’s British Theatre 1780–1793 and Bell’s English Theatre 1792 (London: University of Western Ontario, 1982).Google Scholar

Campbell, T. D., ‘Francis Hutcheson: “Father” of the Scottish Enlightenment’, in Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, Andrew S. (eds.), The Origins and Nature of the Scottish Enlightenment (Edinburgh: John Donald, 1982): 167–85.Google Scholar

Cannan, Paul D., ‘The 1709/11 Editions of Shakespeare’s Poems’, in Depledge, and Kirwan, , Canonising Shakespeare, 171–86.Google Scholar

Cannon, Carl L., American Book Collectors and Collecting, from Colonial Times to the Present (New York: H. W. Wilson, 1941).Google Scholar

Capell, Edward, Notes and Various Readings to Shakespeare, ed. Collins, John, 3 vols. (London: for the author, 1779–80).Google Scholar

Carlson, Gary, ‘Literary Works in Machine-Readable Form, C&H, 1/3 (January 1967): 75–102.Google Scholar

Carson, Christie, ‘Creating a Context: The Case of King Lear’, Theatre Journal, 51/4 (1999): 433–41.Google Scholar

Carson, Christie, ‘The Evolution of Online Editing: Where Will It End?’, SS, 59 (2006): 168–81.Google Scholar

Carson, Christie and Kirwan, Peter (eds.), Shakespeare and the Digital World: Redefining Scholarship and Practice (Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carter, Harry, A History of Oxford University Press (Oxford University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

Chambers, E. K., The Disintegration of Shakespeare (Oxford University Press for the British Academy, 1924).Google Scholar

Chartier, Roger, ‘Binding and Unbinding: The Seven Publishing Lives of William Shakespeare’, CÉ, 93/1 (July 2017): 90–106.Google Scholar

Christian, Edmund B. V., ‘The Advertiser’s Shakespeare’, Gentleman’s Magazine, March 1893: 305–11.Google Scholar

Churchill, George B., ‘Shakespeare in America’, Jahrbuch der Deutschen Shakespeare-Gesellschaft, 42 (1906): xiii–xlv.Google Scholar

Clark, W. G. and Luard, H. R., The First Act of Shakespeare’s ‘King Richard II’. Intended as a Specimen of a New Edition of Shakespeare (Cambridge University Press, 1860).Google Scholar

Clayton, Tom (ed.), The Hamlet First Published (Q1, 1603): Origins, Form, Intertextualities (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Cloud, Random, ‘The Marriage of Good and Bad Quartos’, SQ, 4/33 (1982): 421–31.Google Scholar

Cloud, Random, ‘“The very names of the Persons”: Editing and the Invention of Dramatick Character’, in Kastan, David Scott and Stallybrass, Peter (eds.), Staging the Renaissance: Reinterpretations of Elizabethan and Jacobean Drama (London: Routledge, 1991): 88–96.Google Scholar

Coghill, Nevill, Shakespeare’s Professional Skills (Cambridge University Press, 1964).Google Scholar

Cole, Richard Cargill, Irish Booksellers and English Writers (London: Mansell, 1986).Google Scholar

Collier, John Payne, Reasons for a New Edition of Shakespeare’s Works, Containing Notices of the Defects of Former Impressions, and Pointing out the Lately Acquired Means of Illustrating the Plays, Poems, and Biography of the Poet (London: Whittaker, 1842).Google Scholar

Collier, John Payne, Letter regarding the ‘Perkins Folio’, Ath., 1266 (January 1852): 142–4.Google Scholar

Collier, John Payne, Notes and Emendations to the Text of Shakespeare’s Plays, from Early Manuscript Corrections in a Copy of the Folio, 1632, in the Possession of J. Payne Collier, Esq. F.S.A.. (London: Shakespeare Society, 1852 [for 1853]; originally published London: Whittaker, 1853).Google Scholar

Collier, John Payne, ‘A New Shakspeare’, Ath., 2463 (January 1875): 52.Google Scholar

[Collins, John], A Letter to George Hardinge, Esq. on the Subject of a Passage in Mr. Steevens’s Preface to his Impression of Shakespeare (London: G. Kearsly, 1777).Google Scholar

Collins, John Churton, ‘The Porson of Shakspearian Criticism’, Quarterly Review, 175 (1892): 102–31.Google Scholar

Colvin, Sidney, Obituary for William Aldis Wright, Journal of Philology, 33 (1914): 299–301.Google Scholar

Connor, Francis X., ‘Henry Herringman, Richard Bentley and Shakespeare’s Fourth Folio (1685)’, in Depledge, and Kirwan, (eds.), Canonising Shakespeare, 38–54.Google Scholar

Corballis, Richard, ‘Copy-Text for Theobald’s “Shakespeare”’, Lib., 6th series, 7 (1986): 156–9.Google Scholar

Corbin, John, ‘Shakespeare Against his Editors, North American Review, 28 February 1907: 398–406.Google Scholar

Cotes, Cornelius, Publisher’s statement in Cotes Weekly Journal: or, the English Stage-Player, 1 (11 May 1734): 1.Google Scholar

Cottegnies, Line, ‘The Saint-Omer Folio in Its Library’, CÉ 93/1 (2017): 13–32.Google Scholar

Cottegnies, Line and Mayer, Jean-Christophe, ‘Introduction: The Anatomy of an Iconic Book’, CÉ, 93/1 (2017): 3–12.Google Scholar

Cowden Clarke, Charles, Shakespeare-Characters; Chiefly those Subordinate (London: Smith, Elder; Edinburgh: James Nichol, 1863).Google Scholar

Cowden Clarke, Mary, My Long Life (London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1896).Google Scholar

Crane, Ralph, The Workes of Mercy, Both Corporall and Spiritvall (London, 1621).Google Scholar

Crockett, Bryan, ‘Shakespeare, Playfere, and the Pirates’, SQ, 66/3 (Fall 2015): 252–85.Google Scholar

Crosse, Gordon, ‘Charles Jennens as Editor of Shakespeare’, Lib., 4th series, 16 (1935): 236–40.Google Scholar

Cummings, Brian, ‘Shakespeare’s First Folio and the Fetish of the Book’, CÉ, 93/1 (2017): 50–69.Google Scholar

Curwen, Henry, A History of Booksellers, the Old and the New (London: Chatto & Windus, 1873).Google Scholar

Daiches, David, ‘Presenting Shakespeare’, in Briggs, Asa (ed.), Essays in the History of Publishing in Celebration of the 250th Anniversary of the House of Longman 1724–1974 (London: Longman, 1974): 63–112.Google Scholar

Dash, Irene G., ‘When the Culture Obtrudes: Hanmer’s Winter’s Tale, in Gondris, (ed.), Reading Readings, 268–80.Google Scholar

Davidson, Adele, Shakespeare in Shorthand: The Textual Mystery of King Lear (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Dawson, Anthony B., Review of The RSC Shakespeare, SQ, 59/4 (Winter 2008): 483–8.Google Scholar

Dawson, Giles E., ‘The Copyright of Shakespeare’s Dramatic Works’, in Prouty, C. T. (ed.), Studies in Honor of A. H. R. Fairchild, University of Missouri Studies xxi/1 (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1946): 11–35.Google Scholar

Dawson, Giles E., ‘Warburton, Hanmer, and the 1745 Edition of Shakespeare’, SB, 2 (1949–50): 35–48.Google Scholar

Dawson, Giles E., ‘Some Bibliographical Irregularities in the Shakespeare First Folio’, SB, 4 (1951–2): 93–103.Google Scholar

Dawson, Giles E., ‘Robert Walker’s Editions of Shakespeare’, in Bennett, Josephine W., Cargill, Oscar and Hall, Vernon Jr (eds.), Studies in the English Renaissance Drama in Memory of Karl Julius Holzknecht (New York University Press, 1959): 58–81.Google Scholar

Dawson, Giles E., Four Centuries of Shakespeare Publishing (Lawrence: University of Kansas Libraries, 1964).Google Scholar

de Grazia, Margreta, ‘The Essential Shakespeare and the Material Book’, Textual Practice, 2/1 (1988): 69–86.Google Scholar

de Grazia, Margreta, Shakespeare Verbatim: The Reproduction of Authenticity and the 1790 Apparatus (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).Google Scholar

de Grazia, Margreta, ‘The Scandal of Shakespeare’s Sonnets’, SS, 46 (1994): 35–49.Google Scholar

de Grazia, Margreta, ‘The Question of the One and the Many: The Globe Shakespeare, The Complete “King Lear”, and the New Folger Library Shakespeare’, SQ, 46/2 (1995): 245–51.Google Scholar

Dean Jonathan’s Parody on the 4th Chap. of Genesis (London: Timothy Atkins, 1729).Google Scholar

Deazley, Ronan, On the Origin of the Right to Copy: Charting the Movement of Copyright Law in Eighteenth-Century Britain (1695–1775) (Oxford: Hart, 2004).Google Scholar

Deegan, Marilyn and Sutherland, Kathryn, Transferred Illusions: Digital Technology and the Forms of Print (Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 2009).Google Scholar

Depledge, Emma, ‘False Dating: The Case of the “1676” Hamlet Quartos’, PBSA, 112/2 (2018): 183–99.Google Scholar

Depledge, Emma, Shakespeare’s Rise to Cultural Prominence: Politics, Print and Alteration, 1642–1700 (Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Depledge, Emma and Kirwan, Peter (eds.), Canonising Shakespeare: Stationers and the Book Trade 1640–1740 (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Dix, E. R. McClintock, ‘Irish Pirated Editions, An Leabharlann, 2 (1906): 67–77.Google Scholar

Dixon, Peter, ‘Pope’s Shakespeare’, Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 63 (1964): 191–203.Google Scholar

Dobson, Michael and Wells, Stanley (eds.), The Oxford Companion to Shakespeare (Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Donaldson, Alexander, A catalogue of curious and valuable books, to be disposed of by way of sale (the lowest price being marked at each book), at the shop of Alexander Donaldson, the first fore–stair above the entry to the Royal Bank, Edinburgh (Edinburgh: Donaldson, 1753).Google Scholar

[Donaldson, Alexander?] Some Thoughts on the state of literary property, humbly submitted to the consideration of the public (Edinburgh: Donaldson, 1764).Google Scholar

Donaldson, AlexanderConsiderations on the nature and origin of literary property wherein that species of property is clearly proved to subsist no longer than for the terms fixed by the statute 8vo Annæ (Edinburgh: Donaldson, 1767).Google Scholar

Duff, E. Gordon, A Century of the English Book Trade: Short Notices of All Printers, Stationers, Book-binders, and Others Connected with It from the Issue of the First Dated Book in 1457 to the Incorporation of the Company of Stationers in 1557 (London: for the Bibliographical Society, 1905).Google Scholar

Duguid, Paul, ‘Material Matters: The Past and Futurology of the Book’, in Nunberg, Geoffrey (ed.), The Future of the Book (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996): 63–101.Google Scholar

Duncan, Robert, Notices and Documents Illustrative of the Literary History of Glasgow, during the greater part of last century (Glasgow: Maitland Club, 1831).Google Scholar

Dunn, Esther Cloudman, Shakespeare in America (New York: Macmillan, 1939).Google Scholar

Dunton, John, The Dublin Scuffle: Being a challenge sent by John Dunton, citizen of London, to Patrick Campbell, bookseller in Dublin … (London: printed for the author, 1699).Google Scholar

Eastman, Arthur M., ‘Johnson’s Shakespeare and the Laity: A Textual Study’, PMLA, 65 (1950): 1112–21.Google Scholar

Eastman, Arthur M., ‘The Texts from which Johnson Printed His Shakespeare’, Journal of English and Germanic Philology , 49 (1950): 182–91.Google Scholar

[Edwards, Thomas], A Supplement to Mr. Warburton’s Edition of Shakespear. Being the Canons of Criticism, and Glossary, Collected from the Notes in that Celebrated Work, and Proper to be Bound up with it (London: M. Cooper, 1748).Google Scholar

Egan, Gabriel, ‘Editions and Textual Matters’, Year’s Work in English Studies, 84/1 (2005): 290–440.Google Scholar

Egan, Gabriel, The Struggle for Shakespeare’s Text: Twentieth-Century Editorial Theory and Practice (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Elam, Keir, ‘Editing Shakespeare by Pictures: Illustrated Editions’, in Kidnie, and Massai, (eds.), Shakespeare and Textual Studies, pp. 249–68.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. E., ‘The Cost of Reading in Eighteenth-Century Britain: Auction Sales Catalogues and the Cheap Literature Hypothesis’, English Literary History, 77/2 (2010): 353–84.Google Scholar

‘English Catalogue’, PC, 1 July 1863.Google Scholar

Enniss, Stephen, ‘Foreword’, in Williams, and Lazzuri, (eds.), Foliomania, vi.Google Scholar

Erne, Lukas, Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist (Cambridge University Press, 2003; 2nd edn 2013).Google Scholar

Erne, Lukas, Shakespeare and the Book Trade (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Erne, Lukas, ‘Cupids Cabinet Unlock’t (1662), Ostensibly “By W. Shakespeare”, in fact partly by John Milton’, in Depledge, and Kirwan, (eds.), Canonising Shakespeare, 89–106.Google Scholar

The Etymologist, a comedy in three acts (London: J. Jarvis, 1785).Google Scholar

Evans, G. Blakemore, ‘Rough Notes on Editions Collated for 1 Henry VI’, Shakespearean Research Opportunities, 2 (1966): 41–9.Google Scholar

Evans, G. ‘Shakespeare Restored – Once Again!’, in Lancashire, Anne (ed.), Editing Renaissance Dramatic Texts (New York: Garland, 1976): 39–56.Google Scholar

Exshaw, Edward and John, , Proposals for Printing by Subscription, the Works of Shakespear in Eight Volumes (Dublin: Exshaw, 1747).Google Scholar

Farmer, Alan B. and Lesser, Zachary, ‘The Popularity of Playbooks Revisited’, SQ, 56/1 (2005): 1–32.Google Scholar

Farmer, Alan B. and Lesser, Zachary, ‘Structures of Popularity in the Early Modern Book Trade’, SQ, 56/2 (2005): 306–13.Google Scholar

Farr, Henry, ‘Notes on Shakespeare’s Printers and Publishers with Special Reference to the Poems and Hamlet’, Lib., 4th series, 3/4 (1923): 225–60.Google Scholar

Farr, Henry, ‘Philip Chetwind and the Allott Copyrights’, Lib., 4th series, 15 (1934–5): 129–60.Google Scholar

Feather, John, ‘The Book Trade in Politics: The Making of the Copyright Act of 1710’, Publishing History, 8 (1980): 19–44.Google Scholar

Feather, John, ‘The English Book Trade and the Law 1695–1799’, Publishing History, 12 (1982): 51–75.Google Scholar

Feather, John, ‘The Publishers and the Pirates: British Copyright Law in Theory and Practice, 1710–1755’, Publishing History, 22 (1987): 5–32.Google Scholar

Feather, John, A History of British Publishing (London: Routledge, 1988).Google Scholar

Fenning, Hugh, ‘The Catholic Press in Munster in the Eighteenth Century’, in Long, Gerard (ed.), Books Beyond the Pale: Aspects of the Provincial Book Trade in Ireland Before 1850 (Dublin: Rare Books Group of the Library Association of Ireland, 1996): 19–31.Google Scholar

‘Festival of the Establishment of Messrs. Reynolds and Dicks’, RN, 12 July 1868: 1.Google Scholar

Fleay, F. G., Shakespeare Manual (London: Macmillan, 1876).Google Scholar

Foakes, R. A., ‘Heavyweight Shakespeare’, Renaissance Quarterly, 51/4 (Winter 1998): 1320–9.Google Scholar

Ford, H. L., Shakespeare 1700–1740: A Collation of the Editions and Separate Plays with some account of T. Johnson and R. Walker (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1935).Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel, ‘What Is an Author?’, in Rabinow, Paul (ed.), The Foucault Reader (New York: Pantheon, 1984): 101–20.Google Scholar

Francis, F. C., ‘The Bibliographical Society: A Sketch of the First Fifty Years’, in Francis, F. C. (ed.), The Bibliographical Society 1892–1942: Studies in Retrospect (London: Bibliographical Society, 1945): 1–22.Google Scholar

Franklin, Colin, Shakespeare Domesticated: The Eighteenth-Century Editions (Aldershot: Scolar, 1991).Google Scholar

Franklin, Colin, ‘The Bowdlers and Their Family Shakespeare’, Book Collector (Summer 2002): 227–43.Google Scholar

[Fredrick, Waveney R. N.], A Shakespeare Bibliography. The Catalogue of the Birmingham Shakespeare Library, Birmingham Public Libraries, 7 vols. (London: Mansell, 1971).Google Scholar

Freeman, Arthur and Freeman, Janet Ing, John Payne Collier: Scholarship and Forgery in the Nineteenth Century, 2 vols. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Freeman, Arthur and Grinke, Paul, ‘Four New Shakespeare Quartos? Viscount Conway’s Lost English Plays’, TLS, 5 April 2002: 17–18.Google Scholar

Friedman, Winifred H., Boydell’s Shakespeare Gallery (New York: Garland, 1976).Google Scholar

Furness, Horace Howard, ‘A New Variorum Shakspere’, Notes and Queries, 4th series, 5 (22 January 1870): 109.Google Scholar

Furness, Horace Howard, On Shakspere, ‘or, what you will’ (Boston: n.p., 1908).Google Scholar

Furnivall, F. J., Prospectus for Shakspere Quarto Facsimiles (no place of publication, publisher, or date).Google Scholar

Furnivall, F. J., Inaugural address to the New Shakspere Society, The New Shakspere Society’s Transactions, series 1, 1–2 (1874): v–xi.Google Scholar

Furnivall, F. J., Prospectus for Proposed Edition of Shakspere in Old Spelling (dated 23 May 1880; no place of publication or publisher).Google Scholar

Gadd, Ian, ‘The Use and Misuse of Early English Books Online’, Literature Compass, 6/3 (2009): 680–92.Google Scholar

Galbraith, Steven K., ‘English Literary Folios 1593–1623: Studying Shifts in Format’, in King, John N. (ed.), Tudor Books and Readers: Materiality and the Construction of Meaning (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Galey, Alan, ‘Signal to Noise: Designing a Digital Edition of “The Taming of a Shrew” (1594)’, College Literature, 36/1 (Winter 2009): 40–65.Google Scholar

Galey, Alan, The Shakespearean Archive: Experiments in New Media from the Renaissance to Postmodernity (Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ganzel, Dewey, Fortune and Men’ s Eyes: The Career of John Payne Collier (Oxford University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Gaskell, Philip, A Bibliography of the Foulis Press (London: Rupert Hart-Davis, 1964).Google Scholar

Geduld, Harry M., Prince of Publishers: A Study of the Work and Career of Jacob Tonson (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1969).Google Scholar

Gellert, James, ‘Davenant’s The Law Against Lovers: A “Lost” Herringman Quarto’, Lib., 6th series, 5 (1983): 57–60.Google Scholar

Gibson, James M., The Philadelphia Shakespeare Story: Horace Howard Furness and the New Variorum Shakespeare (New York: AMS, 1990).Google Scholar

Giordano-Orsini, G. N., ‘Thomas Heywood’s Play on “The Troubles of Queen Elizabeth”’, Lib., 4th series, 14 (1933–4): 313–38.Google Scholar

Glasgow Bibliographical Society, Catalogue of the Foulis Exhibition Held in the University of Glasgow, April 1913 (Glasgow: MacLehose, 1913).Google Scholar

‘The Globe Edition of Shakspeare’, The Bookseller, 30 September 1864: 587.Google Scholar

Gondris, Joanna, ‘“All This Farrago”: The Eighteenth-Century Shakespeare Variorum Page as a Critical Structure’, in Gondris, (ed.), Reading Readings: Essays on Shakespeare Editing in the Eighteenth Century (Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

[Gould, Edward S.], Review of Henry N. Hudson’s 1851–6 Edition of Shakespeare, North American Review, 84 (1857): 183–203.Google Scholar

Grady, Hugh, The Modernist Shakespeare: Critical Texts in a Material World (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Graff, Gerald, Professing Literature (University of Chicago Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Gray, W. Forbes, ‘Alexander Donaldson and His Fight for Cheap Books’, Juridical Review, 38 (1926): 180–202.Google Scholar

Grebanier, Bernard, The Great Shakespeare Forgery: A New Look at the Career of William Henry Ireland (London: Heinemann, 1966).Google Scholar

Greenblatt, Stephen, Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Greetham, D. C., Textual Scholarship: An Introduction (New York: Garland, 1994).Google Scholar

Greg, W. W., Catalogue of the Books Presented by Edward Capell to the Library of Trinity College in Cambridge (Cambridge University Press, 1903).Google Scholar

Greg, W. W., Review of McKerrow, (ed.), The Works of Thomas Nashe, vol. 1, MLR, 4 (1904): 153.Google Scholar

Greg, W. W., Review of Collins, John Churton (ed.), The Plays and Poems of Robert Greene, MLR, 1 (1905–6): 337–41.Google Scholar

Greg, W. W., Review of McKerrow, Review of Collins, John Churton ‘On Certain False Dates in Shakespearian Quartos’, Lib., 2nd series, 9 (1908): 113–31 and 381–409.Google Scholar

Greg, W. W., Review of McKerrow, Review of Collins, John Churton ‘The “Hamlet” Texts and Recent Work in Shakespearian Bibliography’, MLR, 14 (1919): 380–5.Google Scholar

Greg, W. W., Review of McKerrow, Review of Collins, John Churton ‘Prompt Copies, Private Transcripts, and the “Playhouse Scrivener”’, Lib., 4th Series, 6/2 (1925): 148–56.Google Scholar

Greg, W. W., Review of McKerrow, Review of Collins, John Churton Calculus of Variants: An Essay on Textual Criticism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1927).Google Scholar

Greg, W. W., Review of McKerrow, Review of Collins, John Churton Principles of Emendation in Shakespeare (London: Humphrey Milford, 1928); a separate volume, the text originally having been included in PBA, 14.Google Scholar

Greg, W. W., Review of McKerrow, Review of Collins, John Churton ‘“T. Goodal” in Sir Thomas More’, PMLA, 46/1 (1931): 268–71.Google Scholar

Greg, W. W., Review of McKerrow, Review of Collins, John Churton A Bibliography of the English Printed Drama to the Restoration. I: Stationers’ Records; Plays to 1616: Nos. 1–349 (London: Bibliographical Society, 1939).Google Scholar

Greg, W. W., Review of McKerrow, Review of Collins, John Churton ‘Ronald Brunlees McKerrow 1872–1940’, PBA, 26 (1940): 489–515.Google Scholar

Greg, W. W., Review of McKerrow, Review of Collins, John Churton The Editorial Problem in Shakespeare: A Survey of the Foundations of the Text, 3rd edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954).Google Scholar

Greg, W. W., Review of McKerrow, Review of Collins, John Churton The Shakespeare First Folio: Its Bibliographical and Textual History (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1955).Google Scholar

Greg, W. W., Review of McKerrow, Review of Collins, John Churton Review of Bowers, Fredson, On Editing Shakespeare and the Elizabethan Dramatists, SQ, 7/1 (1956): 101–4.Google Scholar

Greg, W. W., Review of McKerrow, Review of Collins, John Churton Review of Bowers, Fredson, Review of Bowers, Fredson (ed.), The Dramatic Works of Thomas Dekker, III, RES, 10 (1959): 413–15.Google Scholar

Greg, W. W., Review of McKerrow, Review of Collins, John Churton Review of Bowers, Fredson, Review of Bowers, Fredson Biographical Notes 1877–1947 (Oxford: New Bodleian Library, 1960).Google Scholar

Greg, W. W., Review of McKerrow, Review of Collins, John Churton Review of Bowers, Fredson, Review of Bowers, Fredson Collected Papers, ed. Maxwell, J. C. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966).Google Scholar

Greg, W. W. and Boswell, E. (eds.), Records of the Court of the Stationers’ Company: 1576 to 1602, from Register B (London: Bibliographical Society, 1930).Google Scholar

[Grey, Zachary], A Word or Two of Advice to William Warburton; A Dealer in Many Words (London: printed for J. L., 1746).Google Scholar

The Grimaldi Shakspere. Notes and Emendations on the Plays of Shakspere, from a Recently-discovered Annotated Copy by the late Joseph Grimaldi, Esq., Comedian (London: J. Russell Smith, 1853).Google Scholar

Gurr, Andrew, ‘Maximal and Minimal Texts: Shakespeare v. The Globe’, SS, 52 (1999): 68–87.Google Scholar

Hackel, Heidi Brayman, Reading Material in Early Modern England: Print, Gender, and Literacy (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Hailey, R. Carter, ‘The Shakespearian Pavier Quartos Revisited’, SB, 57 (2005–6): 151–95.Google Scholar

Hailey, R. Carter, ‘The Dating Game: New Evidence for the Dates of Q4 Romeo and Juliet and Q4 Hamlet’, SQ, 58/3 (Fall 2007): 367–87.Google Scholar

Hailey, R. Carter, ‘The Best Crowne Paper’, in Williams, and Lazzuri, (eds.), Foliomania, 8–14.Google Scholar

Halliwell[-Phillips], J. O., Curiosities of Modern Shaksperian Criticism (London: privately published, 1853).Google Scholar

Halliwell[-Phillips], J. O., A Few Words in Defence of the Memory of Edward Capell, Occasioned by a Criticism in the Times Newspaper, December the 26th, 1860 (London: printed only for presentation, 1861).Google Scholar

Halliwell[-Phillips], J. O., Prospectuses of 1. The folio edition of Shakespeare, completed in sixteen volumes. Illustrated. 2. Facsimiles of all the quarto editions of the works of Shakespeare which were issued in the life-time of the poet. Forty-seven volumes ([London]: n.p., c. 1870).Google Scholar

Hamilton, N. E. S. A., An Inquiry into the Genuineness of the Manuscript Corrections in Mr. J. Payne Collier’s Annotated Shakspere, Folio, 1632 … (London: Bentley, 1860).Google Scholar

HammJr, Robert B., ‘Rowe’s Shakespear (1709) and the Tonson House Style’, College Literature, 31/3 (2004): 179–205.Google Scholar

Hamm, , ‘Walker v. Tonson in the Court of Public Opinion’, Huntington Library Quarterly, 75/1 (2012): 95–112.Google Scholar

Hammerschmidt-Hummel, H. ‘Promoting’, in Pape, Walter and Burwick, Frederick (eds.), The Boydell Shakespeare Gallery (Bottrop: Peter Pomp, 1996): 33–44.Google Scholar

Hammond, Brean S., ‘Theobald’s Double Falshood: An “Agreeable Cheat”?’, Notes and Queries , 229 (March 1984): 2–3.Google Scholar

Hammond, Joseph W., ‘The King’s Printers in Ireland, 1551–1919’ (part 3), Dublin Historical Record, 11 (1949–50): 88–96.Google Scholar

Hansen, Lara and Rasmussen, Eric, ‘Shakespeare Without Rules: The Fifth Shakespeare Folio and Market Demand in the Early 1700s’, in Depledge, and Kirwan, (eds.), Canonising Shakespeare, 55–62.Google Scholar

Hart, Hymen Harold, ‘Edward Capell: The First Modern Editor of Shakespeare’, PhD dissertation, University of Illinois (1967).Google Scholar

Harvey, Sara King, ‘Gulian Crommelin Verplanck: A Forgotten Knickerbocker’, PhD dissertation, University of Chicago (1934).Google Scholar

Hayes, Michael L., ‘Shakespeare’s Hand Unknown in Sir Thomas More: Thompson, Dawson, and the Futility of the Paleographic Argument’, SQ, 67/2 (Summer 2016): 180–203.Google Scholar

Hazen, Allen, ‘Johnson’s Shakespeare: A Study in Cancellation’, TLS, 24 December 1938: 820.Google Scholar

Heath, Benjamin, A Revisal of Shakespear’s Text, wherein the Alterations Introduced into it by the More Modern Editors and Critics are Particularly Considered (London: W. Johnston, 1765).Google Scholar

Heffernan, Megan, ‘Turning Sonnets into Poems: Textual Affect and John Benson’s Metaphysical Shakespeare’, SQ, 64/1 (Spring 2013): 71–98.Google Scholar

Hervey, Thomas, A Letter from the Hon. Thomas Hervey, to Sir Thomas Hanmer, Bart. (Glasgow: J. Donaldson, n.d.).Google Scholar

Heywood, Thomas, An Apology for Actors. Containing Three Briefe Treatises (London: Nicholas Okes, 1612).Google Scholar

Heywood, Thomas, Pleasant Dialogves and Drammas … (London: by R. O. for R. H., 1637).Google Scholar

H. H. F. J. [Furness, Horace Howard Jr.] (ed.), The Letters of Horace Howard Furness (Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1922).Google Scholar

Hinman, Charlton, The Printing and Proof-Reading of the First Folio of Shakespeare, 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963).Google Scholar

Hirrel, Michael J., ‘Duration of Performances and Lengths of Plays: How Shall We Beguile the Lazy Time?’, SQ, 61/2 (Summer 2010): 159–82.Google Scholar

Hirsch, Brett D. and Craig, Hugh, ‘“Mingled Yarn”: The State of Computing in Shakespeare 2.0’, Shakespearean International Yearbook, 14 (2014): 3–35.Google Scholar

Hirschfeld, Heather, Review of The New Oxford Shakespeare, Bulletin of the Comediantes, 70/2 (2018): 189–93.Google Scholar

Holderness, Graham and Loughrey, Bryan, ‘Shakespeare Misconstrued: The True Chronicle Historie of Shakespearean Originals’, Textus, 9 (1996): 393–418.Google Scholar

Holland, Peter and Onorato, Mary, ‘Scholars and the Marketplace: Creating Online Shakespeare Collections’, Shakespeare, 4/3 (2008): 245–53.Google Scholar

[Holt, John], An Attempt to Rescue that Aunciente, English Poet, and Play-Wrighte, Maister Williaume Shakespere … (London: printed for the author, 1749).Google Scholar

Honigmann, Ernst, The Stability of Shakespeare’s Text (London: Edward Arnold, 1965).Google Scholar

Honigmann, Ernst, The Texts of ‘Othello’ and Shakespearian Revision (London: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar

Hooks, Adam, ‘Shakespeare at the White Greyhound’, SS, 64 (2011): 260–75.Google Scholar

Hooks, Adam, Selling Shakespeare: Biography, Bibliography, and the Book Trade (Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Hosley, Richard, Knowles, Richard and McGugan, Ruth, Shakespeare Variorum Handbook: A Manual of Editorial Practice (New York: MLA, 1971).Google Scholar

Howard-Hill, Trevor, ‘The Oxford Old-Spelling Shakespeare Concordances’, SB, 22 (1969): 143–64.Google Scholar

Howard-Hill, Trevor, ‘A Common Shakespeare Text File for Computer-Aided Research: A Proposal’, Computer Studies in the Humanities and Verbal Behavior, 4/1 (1973): 53–6.Google Scholar

Howard-Hill, Trevor, ‘Towards the Twenty-First Century: The Oxford Shakespeares’, AEB, n.s., 4 (1990): 3–5.Google Scholar

Howard-Hill, Trevor, ‘Shakespeare’s Earliest Editor, Ralph Crane’, SS, 44 (1991): 113–29Google Scholar

Howard-Hill, Trevor, ‘Alice Walker (8 December 1900–14 October 1982)’, in Baker, and Womack, (eds.), Twentieth-Century British Book Collectors (Detroit: Gale, 1999), 297–304.Google Scholar

Howard-Hill, Trevor (ed.), Shakespeare and ‘Sir Thomas More’: Essays on the Play and Its Shakespearian Interest (Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Hudson, Henry N., Lectures on Shakespeare (New York: Baker and Scribner, 1848).Google Scholar

Hudson, Henry N., Essays on Education, English Studies, and Shakespeare (Boston: Ginn, Heath, 1882).Google Scholar

Hugh Gaine’s Catalogue of Books, lately imported from England, Ireland, and Scotland … (New York: Hugh Gaine, 1792).Google Scholar

Hughes, Glenn, A History of the American Theatre, 1700–1950 (New York: Samuel French, 1951).Google Scholar

Hume, Peter D., ‘Before the Bard: “Shakespeare” in Early Eighteenth-Century London’, English Literary History, 64 (1997): 41–75.Google Scholar

Hunter, Michael, Editing Early Modern Texts: An Introduction to Principles and Practice (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).Google Scholar

Hurt, John S., Elementary Schooling and the Working Classes, 1860–1918 (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979).Google Scholar

Ioppolo, Grace, Revising Shakespeare (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Ioppolo, Grace, Dramatists and Their Manuscripts in the Age of Shakespeare, Jonson, Middleton and Heywood: Authorship, Authority and the Playhouse (London: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar

Irace, Kathleen O., Reforming the ‘Bad’ Quartos: Performance and Provenance of Six Shakespearean First Editions (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Jackson, A., ‘Rowe’s Edition of Shakespeare’, Lib., 4th series, 10 (1930): 455–73.Google Scholar

Jackson, MacDonald P., Determining the Shakespeare Canon: Arden of Faversham and A Lover’s Complaint (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Jackson, MacDonald P., ‘Authorship Attribution and the New Oxford Shakespeare: Some Facts and Misconceptions’, ANQ: A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes, and Reviews, 33 (2020): 148–55.Google Scholar

Jackson, William A., ‘Counterfeit Printing in Jacobean Times’, Lib., 4th series, 15 (1935): 364–76.Google Scholar

Jackson, William A., ‘Some Limitations of Microfilm’, PBSA, 35/4 (1941): 281–8.Google Scholar

Jackson, William A., (ed.), Records of the Court of the Stationers’ Company 1602–1640 (London: Bibliographical Society, 1957).Google Scholar

Jaggard, William, Shakespeare Bibliography: A Dictionary of Every Known Issue of the Writings of Our National Poet: And of Recorded Opinion Thereon in the English Language (Stratford-upon-Avon: Shakespeare Press, 1911).Google Scholar

Jaques, (pseud.), Modern Corruptions of Shakespeare’s Text. A Letter to a Friend on the Subject of ‘Cassell’s Illustrated Shakespeare’ (London: Printed for private circulation, 1869).Google Scholar

Jarvis, Simon, Scholars and Gentlemen: Shakespearian Textual Criticism and Representations of Scholarly Labour, 1725–1765 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).Google Scholar

J.C.T.O., Wilson, John Dover, Walker, Alice, St Clare Byrne, Muriel, Bowers, Fredson and Francis, F. C., ‘Walter Wilson Greg: 9 July 1875 – 4 March 1959’, Lib., 5th series, 14/3 (September 1959): 150–74.Google Scholar

‘J.F.K.’, Letter concerning the ‘Perkins Folio’, Ath., 1274 (27 March 1852): 363.Google Scholar

Johnson, Gerald D., ‘Thomas Pavier, Publisher, 1600–25’, Lib., 6th series, 14 (1992): 12–50.Google Scholar

Johnson, Samuel, Miscellaneous Observations on the Tragedy of Macbeth: with remarks on Sir T. H.’s edition of Shakespear. To which is affix’d, proposals for a new edition of Shakeshear [sic], with a specimen (London: E. Cave, 1745).Google Scholar

Johnson, Samuel, Proposals for a New Edition of Shakespeare (London, 1756; facsimile reprint, London: Humphrey Milford, 1923).Google Scholar

Johnson, Thomas, ‘Catalogue of English Plays’, included in the end pages of Johnson’s edition of Dryden and Davenant’s The Tempest (The Hague: Johnson, 1721), unpaged.Google Scholar

Jones, Claude E. (ed.), Isaac Reed Diaries, 1762–1804 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1946).Google Scholar

Jones, John D., ‘Shakespeare in English Schools’, Jahrbuch der Deutschen Shakespeare-Gesellschaft, 32 (1906): 113–23.Google Scholar

Jones, R. F., Lewis Theobald: His Contributions to English Scholarship, with Some Unpublished Letters (New York: Columbia University Press, 1919).Google Scholar

Jonson, Ben, [The Workes of Benjamin Jonson] (London: n.p., 1631–41).Google Scholar

Jowett, John, Review of The Riverside Shakespeare (second edition), MLR, 94/4 (October 1999): 1079–80.Google Scholar

Jowett, John, ‘Editing Shakespeare’s Plays in the Twentieth Century’, SS, 59 (2006): 1–19.Google Scholar

Jowett, John, Shakespeare and Text (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Kastan, David Scott, Shakespeare After Theory (New York: Routledge, 1999).Google Scholar

Kastan, David Scott, Shakespeare and the Book (Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Kernan, Alvin, Printing Technology, Letters and Samuel Johnson (Princeton University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Kichuk, Diana, ‘Metamorphosis: Remediation in Early English Books Online (EEBO)’, Literary and Linguistic Computing, 22/3 (2007): 291–303.Google Scholar

Kidnie, Margaret Jane and Massai, Sonia (eds.), Shakespeare and Textual Studies (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Kirwan, Peter, ‘The Shakespeare Apocrypha and Canonical Expansion in the Marketplace’, Philological Quarterly , 91/2 (2012): 247–75.Google Scholar

Kirwan, Peter, Shakespeare and the Idea of Apocrypha: Negotiating the Boundaries of the Dramatic Canon (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Kirwood, A. E. M., ‘Richard Field, Printer, 1589–1624’, Lib., 4th series, 12 (1931): 1–35.Google Scholar

Kiséry, András, ‘An Author and a Bookshop: Publishing Marlowe’s Remains at the Black Bear’, Philological Quarterly , 91/3 (Summer 2012): 361–92.Google Scholar

Kliman, Bernice W., ‘Samuel Johnson and Tonson’s 1745 Shakespeare: Warburton, Anonymity, and the Shakespeare Wars’, in Gondris, (ed.), Reading Readings, 299–317.Google Scholar

Kliman, Bernice W., ‘Samuel Johnson and Tonson’s 1745 Shakespeare: Warburton, Anonymity, and the Shakespeare Wars’, in Gondris, ‘Print and Electronic Editions Inspired by the New Variorum Hamlet Project’, SS, 59 (2006): 157–67.Google Scholar

Knight, Charles, Prospectus for the ‘Pictorial Edition of Shakspeare’ (London: Charles Knight and Co., July 1838).Google Scholar

Knight, Charles, Old Lamps, or New? A Plea for the Original Editions of the Text of Shakspere: Forming an Introductory Notice to the Stratford Shakspere, Edited by Charles Knight (London: n.p., 1853).Google Scholar

Knight, Charles, Passages of a Working Life, 3 vols. (London: Bradbury & Evans, 1864–5).Google Scholar

Knight, Charles, Shadows of the Old Booksellers (London: Bell & Daldy, 1865).Google Scholar

Knight, Jeffrey Todd, ‘Invisible Ink: A Note on Ghost Images in Early Printed Books’, Textual Cultures, 5/2 (Autumn 2010): 53–62.Google Scholar

Knight, Jeffrey Todd, Bound to Read: Compilations, Collections, and the Making of Renaisssance Literature (Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knowles, Richard, ‘Dates for Some Serially Published Shakespeares’, SB, 40 (1987): 187–202.Google Scholar

Knowles, Richard, Shakespeare Variorum Handbook: A Manual of Editorial Practice, 2nd edn, rev. and enlarged by Knowles (New York: MLA, 2003).Google Scholar

Kubler, George A., A New History of Stereotyping (New York: n.p., 1941).Google Scholar

Lancashire, Ian, ‘The State of Computing in Shakespeare’, Shakespearean International Yearbook, 2 (2002): 89–110.Google Scholar

Lancashire, Ian, ‘The Public Domain Shakespeare’, available at https://extra.shu.ac.uk/emls/iemls/shaksper/files/LANCSHIR%20PD_SHAKE.txt.Google Scholar

Laoutaris, Chris, ‘The Prefatorial Material’, in Smith, Emma (ed.), Cambridge Companion, 48–67.Google Scholar

Lavagnino, John, ‘Reading, Scholarship, and Hypertext Editions’, TEXT, 8 (1995): 109–24.Google Scholar

Lavagnino, John, ‘Shakespeare and the Digital Humanities’, in Carson, and Kirwan, (eds.), Shakespeare and the Digital World, 14–23.Google Scholar

Lesser, Zachary, Renaissance Drama and the Politics of Publication (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Lesser, Zachary, ‘Playbooks’, in Raymond, Joad (ed.), The Oxford History of Popular Print Culture. 1: Cheap Print in Britain and Ireland to 1660 (Oxford University Press, 2011): 520–34.Google Scholar

Lesser, Zachary, Hamlet After Q1: An Uncanny History of the Shakespearean Text (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Lesser, Zachary, Ghosts, Holes, Rips and Scrapes: Shakespeare in 1619, Bibliography in the Longue Durée (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Lesser, Zachary and Stallybrass, Peter, ‘The First Literary Hamlet and the Commonplacing of Professional Plays’, SQ, 59/4 (Winter 2008): 371–420.Google Scholar

A Letter from a Gentleman in Edinburgh, to his Friend in London; Concerning Literary Property (Edinburgh? 1769).Google Scholar

Levine, Lawrence W., Highbrow/Lowbrow: The Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988).Google Scholar

List of books held in the New England Courant offices, New England Courant, 48 (25 June to 2 July 1722), verso.Google Scholar

Long, William B., ‘“A bed / for woodstock”: A Warning for the Unwary’, Medieval and Renaissance Drama in England, 2 (1985): 91–118.Google Scholar

Long, William B., ‘“Precious Few”: English Manuscript Playbooks’, in Kastan, David Scott (ed.), A Companion to Shakespeare (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999): 414–33.Google Scholar

Loomba, Ania, ‘Shakespeare and Cultural Difference’, in Hawkes, Terence (ed.), Alternative Shakespeares, II (London: Routledge, 1996): 164–91.Google Scholar

Loomba, Ania, ‘Shakespearian Transformations’, in Joughin, John J. (ed.), Shakespeare and National Culture (Manchester University Press, 1997): 109–41.Google Scholar

Lorenz, Alfred L., Hugh Gaine, A Colonial Printer-Editor’s Odyssey to Loyalism (Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1972).Google Scholar

Lounsbury, T. R., The Text of Shakespeare (New York: Scribner, 1906).Google Scholar

Low, Walter, A Classified Catalogue of School, College, Classical, Technical, and General Educational Works in Use in Great Britain in the Early Part of 1871 … (London: Sampson Low, Son, and Marston, 1871).Google Scholar

Low, Walter, A Classified Catalogue of School, College, Classical, Technical, and General Educational Works in use in the United Kingdom and its Dependencies in 1876 … (London: Sampson Low, Marston, Searle, & Rivington, 1876).Google Scholar

[Lowell, James Russell], ‘White’s Shakspeare (second notice)’, Atlantic Monthly, 3 (February 1859): 241–60.Google Scholar

Lowry, Anita, ‘Electronic Texts in English and American Literature’, Library Trends, 40/4 (Spring 1992): 704–23.Google Scholar

Lunsford, Karen, Review of Library of the Future, C&H, 28/6 (1994/5): 405–8.Google Scholar

Lynch, Kathleen M., Jacob Tonson, Kit-Kat Publisher (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1971).Google Scholar

Lynch, Michael, Scotland: A New History (London: Pimlico, 1991).Google Scholar

Lyons, Tara L., ‘Serials, Spinoffs, and Histories: Selling Shakespeare Collections Before the First Folio’, Philological Quarterly, 91/2 (2012): 185–220.Google Scholar

Lyons, Tara L., ‘Shakespeare in Print Before 1623’, in Smith, Emma (ed.), Cambridge Companion, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar

Macmillan, Alexander, Printed letter to booksellers, dated 15 October 1864.Google Scholar

Macmillan, George (ed.), Letters of Alexander Macmillan (London: Macmillan, 1908).Google Scholar

Maguire, Laurie E., Shakespearean Suspect Texts: The ‘Bad’ Quartos and their Contexts (Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Mak, Bonnie, ‘Archaeology of a Digitization’, Journal for the Association of Information Science and Technology, 65/8 (2014): 1515–26.Google Scholar

Malone, Edmond, Proposals for a new edition of Shakespeare, dated 6 February 1792 (no publisher or place of publication).Google Scholar

Marcus, Leah, Unediting the Renaissance: Shakespeare, Marlowe, Milton (London: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar

Marder, Louis, His Exits and His Entrances: The Story of Shakespeare’s Reputation (London: John Murray, 1964).Google Scholar

Martin, Peter, Edmond Malone, Shakespearean Scholar: A Literary Biography (Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Massai, Sonia, Shakespeare and the Rise of the Editor (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Massai, Sonia, ‘Edward Blount, the Herberts, and the First Folio’, in Straznicky, Marta (ed.), Shakespeare’s Stationers: Studies in Cultural Bibliography (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013), pp. 132–46.Google Scholar

Mathias, T. J., The Pursuits of Literature. A Satirical Poem in Four Dialogues, 8th edn (London, 1798).Google Scholar

Matthews, Brander, These Many Years: Recollections of a New Yorker (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1917).Google Scholar

Matthews, Robert A. J. and Merriam, Thomas V. N., ‘Neural Computation in Stylometry I [and II]: An Application to the Works of Shakespeare and Fletcher’, Literary & Linguistic Computing, 8/4 (1993): 203–9 and 9/1 (1994): 1–6.Google Scholar

Matthews, William, ‘Shorthand and the Bad Shakespeare Quartos’, MLR, 27 (1932): 243–62.Google Scholar

Matthews, William, ‘Peter Bales, Timothy Bright and William Shakespeare’, Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 34 (1935): 483–510.Google Scholar

Matthews, William, ‘Shakespeare and the Reporters’, Lib., 4th series, 15 (1935): 481–98.Google Scholar

Matthews, William, ‘Correspondence: Shakespeare and the Reporters’, Lib., 4th series, 17 (1936–7): 225–30.Google Scholar

Maw, Martin, ‘A Hornet’s Nest’, Around the Globe (1998): 25.Google Scholar

Mayer, Jean-Christophe, Shakespeare’s Early Readers: A Cultural History from 1590 to 1800 (Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

McAvoy, William C., ‘Best Single-Volume Shakespeare Yet’, SQ, 27/1 (1976): 114, 117–22, 125.Google Scholar

McDougall, Warren, ‘Copyright Litigation in the Court of Sessions, 1738–1749, and the Rise of the Scottish Book Trade’, Edinburgh Bibliographical Society Transactions, part 5, 5 (1988): 2–31.Google Scholar

McDowell, R. B. and Webb, D. A., Trinity College Dublin 1592–1952: An Academic History (Trinity College Dublin Press, 2004; originally published Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

McGann, Jerome J., A Critique of Modern Textual Criticism (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1992; originally published University of Chicago Press, 1983).Google Scholar

McGann, Jerome J., The Textual Condition (Princeton University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

McKenzie, D. F., ‘Typography and Meaning: The Case of William Congreve’, in Buch und Buchhandel in Europa im achtzehnten Jahrhundert: The Book and the Book Trade in Eighteenth-Century Europe, Proceedings of the fifth Wolfenbüttler Symposium, 1–3 Nov. 1977, ed. Barber, Giles and Fabian, Bernhard (Dr. Ernst Hauswedell, Hamburg, 1981): 81–126.Google Scholar

McKenzie, D. F., Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts (London: British Library, 1986).Google Scholar

McKenzie, D. F., (ed.), Stationers’ Company Apprentices 1701–1800 (Oxford Bibliographical Society, 1978).Google Scholar

McKerrow, R. B., Printers’ and Publishers’ Devices in England and Scotland 1485–1640 (London: Bibliographical Society, 1913).Google Scholar

McKerrow, R. B., ‘The Elizabethan Printer and Dramatic Manuscripts’, Lib., 4th series, 12/3 (1931): 253–75.Google Scholar

McKerrow, R. B., The Treatment of Shakespeare’s Text by His Earlier Editors, 1709–1786 (British Academy Annual Lecture, 1933).Google Scholar

McKerrow, R. B., ‘A Suggestion Regarding Shakespeare’s Manuscripts’, RES, 11 (1935): 459–65.Google Scholar

McKerrow, R. B., Prolegomena for the Oxford Shakespeare: A Study in Editorial Method (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1939).Google Scholar

McKerrow, R. B., (gen. ed.), A Dictionary of Printers and Booksellers in England, Scotland and Ireland, and of Foreign Printers of English Books, 1557–1640 (London: Bibliographical Society, 1910).Google Scholar

McKitterick, David, A History of Cambridge University Press. II: Scholarship and Commerce, 1698–1872 (Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

McLaverty, James (ed.), Pope and the Early Eighteenth-Century Book Trade (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).Google Scholar

McLeod, Randall. See also Cloud, Random.Google Scholar

McLeod, Randall, ‘Un-Editing Shakespeare’, Sub-Stance, 33/4 (1982): 26–55.Google Scholar

McMillan, Scott, The Elizabethan Theatre and the Book of Sir Thomas More (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

McMullan, Gordon, ‘Reflections on the Politics of Editing a Complete Works of Shakespeare’, Contemporary Theatre Review, 25/1 (2015): 76–9.Google Scholar

McMullin, B. J., ‘T. Johnson, Bookseller in the Hague’, in Harvey, R., Kirsop, W. and McMullin, B. J. (eds.), An Index of Civilisation: Studies of Printing and Publishing History in Honour of Keith Maslen (Clayton, Victoria: Monash University, 1993), pp. 99–112.Google Scholar

Meisnest, F. W., ‘Wieland’s Translation of Shakespeare’, MLR, 9 (1914): 12–40.Google Scholar

Melnikoff, Kirk, Elizabethan Publishing and the Makings of Literary Culture (University of Toronto Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Meres, Francis, Palladis Tamia. Wits Treasvry Being the Second Part of Wits Commonwealth (London: Cuthbert Burby, 1598).Google Scholar

Milhous, Judith and Hume, Robert D., The Publication of Plays in London 1660–1800: Playwrights, Publishers, and the Market (London: British Library, 2015).Google Scholar

Morash, Christopher, A History of Irish Theatre 1601–2000 (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Morgan, Charles, The House of Macmillan (1843–1943) (London: Macmillan, 1943).Google Scholar

Mowat, Barbara A., ‘The Form of Hamlet’s Fortunes’, Renaissance Drama, 19 (1988): 97–126.Google Scholar

Mowat, Barbara A., ‘Nicholas Rowe and the Twentieth-Century Shakespeare Text’, in Kishi, Tetsuo, Pringle, Roger and Wells, Stanley (eds.), Shakespeare and Cultural Traditions (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1994): 314–22.Google Scholar

Mowat, Barbara A., ‘Constructing the Author’, in Parker, R. B. and Zitner, S. P. (eds.), Elizabethan Theater: Essays in Honor of S. Schoenbaum (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1996): 93–110.Google Scholar

Mowat, Barbara A., ‘The Theatre and Literary Culture’, in Cox, John D. and Kastan, David Scott (eds.), A New History of Early English Drama (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997): 213–30.Google Scholar

Mowat, Barbara A., ‘The Problem of Shakespeare’s Text(s)’, in Maguire, Laurie E. and Berger, Thomas L. (eds.), Textual Formations and Reformations (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1998): 131–48.Google Scholar

Mowat, Barbara A., ‘The Reproduction of Shakespeare’s Texts’, in de Grazia, Margreta and Wells, Stanley (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare (Cambridge University Press, 2001): 13–29.Google Scholar

Mowat, Barbara A., ‘The Founders and the Bard’, Yale Review, 97/4 (October 2009): 1–18.Google Scholar

Mueller, Martin, ‘The Nameless Shakespeare’, TEXT Technology, 1 (2005): 61–70.Google Scholar

Mueller, Martin, ‘Digital Shakespeare, or Towards a Literary Informatics’, Shakespeare, 4/3 (2008): 284–301.Google Scholar

Murphy, Andrew, ‘Shakespeare’s Folios’, Critical Survey, 9/3 (1997): 156–8.Google Scholar

Murphy, Andrew, Shakespeare for the People: Working-Class Readers 1800–1900 (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Murphy, Andrew, ‘Shakespeare Goes Digital: Three Open Internet Editions’, SQ, 61/3 (Fall 2010): 401–10.Google Scholar

Murphy, Andrew, ‘W. W. Greg’, in DiPietro, Cary (ed.), Bradley, Greg, Folger (London: Continuum, 2011): 68–113.Google Scholar

Murphy, Andrew, (ed.), The Renaissance Text: Theory, Editing, Textuality (Manchester University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Murphy, Andrew, (ed.), A Concise Companion to Shakespeare and the Text (Oxford: Blackwell, 2007).Google Scholar

Murray, David, Robert and Andrew Foulis and the Glasgow Press with some account of the Glasgow Academy of the Fine Arts (Glasgow: MacLehose, 1913).Google Scholar

Murray, David, (ed.), Some Letters of Robert Foulis (Glasgow: MacLehose, 1917).Google Scholar

Naiman, Sandra, ‘R. W. Chapman (5 Oct. 1881 – 20 April 1960)’, in Baker, and Womack, (eds.), Twentieth-Century British Book Collectors, 40–8.Google Scholar

Neidig, William, ‘The Shakespeare Quartos of 1619’, Modern Philology, 8 (October 1910): 145–63.Google Scholar

Newton, Thomas (ed.), Paradise Lost. A Poem, in twelve books, 2 vols. (London: J. and R. Tonson and S. Draper, 1749).Google Scholar

Nichols, John (ed.), Illustrations of the Literary History of the Eighteenth Century, consisting of authentic memoir and original letters of eminent persons, and intended as a sequel to the, ‘Literary Anecdotes’, 8 vols. (London: Nichols, Son and Bentley, 1817–58), 8 vols.Google Scholar

[Nichols, Philip], The Castrated Letter of Sir Thomas Hanmer (London: for the author, 1763).Google Scholar

Nicoll, Allardyce, ‘The Editors of Shakespeare from First Folio to Malone’, in Studies in the First Folio (London: Humphrey Milford for Oxford University Press, 1924): 157–78.Google Scholar

Nicoll, Allardyce, The Garrick Stage: Theatres and Audience in the Eighteenth Century (Manchester University Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Notice of the Cambridge edition, PC, 1 July 1863: 322.Google Scholar

Note on the 1902 Sidney Lee facsimile of the First Folio, The Periodical, March 1903: 3.Google Scholar

Notices regarding the Cambridge and Globe editions, The Bookseller, 10 December 1864: 835–6.Google Scholar

Notices regarding Joseph Dennie’s edition, Port Folio, 4:10 (10 March 1804): 79; 4:15 (14 April 1804): 119.Google Scholar

Ó Ciosáin, Niall, Print and Popular Culture in Ireland, 1750–1850 (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1997).Google Scholar

Obituary for William Aldis Wright, The Cambridge Review: A Journal of University Life and Thought, 35:882 (20 May 1914): 466–70.Google Scholar

Osborough, W. N., The Irish Stage: A Legal History (Dublin: Four Courts, 2015).Google Scholar

Oya, Reiko, ‘Authenticating the Inauthentic: Edmond Malone as Editor of the Apocryphal Shakespeare’, SS, 68 (2015): 324–33.Google Scholar

Patterson, Lyman Ray, Copyright in Historical Perspective (Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 1968).Google Scholar

Peck, Francis, New Memoirs of the Life and Poetical Works of Mr. John Milton (London, 1740).Google Scholar

Perrin, Noel, Dr. Bowdler’s Legacy (London: Macmillan, 1970).Google Scholar

Peters, Julie Stone, Theatre of the Book 1480–1880: Print, Text, and Performance in Europe (Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Peters, Justin, The Idealist: Aaron Swartz and the Rise of Free Culture on the Internet (London: Duckworth Overlook, 2016).Google Scholar

Pettegree, Andrew, The Book in the Renaissance (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Pfund, Niko and Lin, Nancy, ‘Hedging Bets While Making Grand Plans’, Chronicle of Higher Education 44/42 (25 June 1999): B9.Google Scholar

Phillips, James W., Printing and Bookselling in Dublin, 1670–1800 (Dublin: Irish Academic Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Pigman, G. W., Review of the Arden Shakespeare on CD-ROM, TLS, 4968 (3 July 1998): 9.Google Scholar

Plant, Marjorie, The English Book Trade: An Economic History of the Making and Sale of Books (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1939).Google Scholar

Plomer, Henry R., ‘The Printers of Shakespeare’s Plays and Poems’, Lib., n.s., 7 (1906): 149–66.Google Scholar

Plomer, Henry R., A Dictionary of the Booksellers and Printers who were at work in England, Scotland and Ireland from 1641 to 1667 (London: Bibliographical Society, 1907).Google Scholar

Plomer, Henry R. et al., A Dictionary of the Printers and Booksellers who were at work in England, Scotland and Ireland from 1668 to 1725 (London: Bibliographical Society, 1922).Google Scholar

Plomer, Henry R., Bushell, G. H. and McClintock Dix, E. R., A Dictionary of the Printers and Booksellers who were at work in England, Scotland and Ireland from 1726 to 1775 (London: Bibliographical Society, 1932).Google Scholar

Pollard, A. W., ‘A Literary Causerie: Shakespeare in the Remainder Market’, The Academy (2 June 1906): 528–9.Google Scholar

Pollard, A. W., Shakespeare’s Folios and Quartos: A Study in the Bibliography of Shakespeare’s Plays, 1594–1685 (London: Methuen, 1909).Google Scholar

Pollard, A. W., Shakespeare’s Fight with the Pirates (London: Alexander Moring, 1917).Google Scholar

Pollard, A. W., Review of John Dover Wilson (ed.) Hamlet, Lib., 4th series, 12 (1932): 116–20.Google Scholar

Pollard, A. W., ‘My First Fifty Years’, in Murphy, Gwendolen (ed.), A Select Bibliography of the Writings of Alfred W. Pollard (Oxford University Press, 1938): 1–15.Google Scholar

Pollard, A. W., (ed.), Shakespeare’s Hand in the Play of Sir Thomas More (Cambridge University Press, 1923).Google Scholar

Pollard, A. W. and Redgrave, G. R. (eds.), A Short-title Catalogue of Books Printed in England, Scotland, & Ireland and of English Books Printed Abroad 1475–1640. Vol. II, I–Z (London: Bibliographical Society, 1976).Google Scholar

Pollard, A. W., Redgrave, G. R. and Pantzer, Katharine F. (eds.), A Short-title Catalogue of Books Printed in England, Scotland, & Ireland and of English Books Printed Abroad 1475–1640. Vol. III, Printers’ & Publishers’ Index (London: Bibliographical Society, 1991).Google Scholar

Pollard, Graham, ‘Notes on the Size of the Sheet’, Lib., 4th series 22/2–3 (1941): 105–37.Google Scholar

Pollard, M., Dublin’s Trade in Books, 1550–1800: Lyell Lectures, 1986–1987 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Poole, John, Hamlet Travestie: in three acts. With annotations by Dr. Johnson and Geo. Steevens, Esq. and other commentators (London, 1810).Google Scholar

Pope, Alexander, The Dunciad, an Heroic Poem. In Three Books (London: A. Dodd, 1728).Google Scholar

Pope, Alexander, The Dunciad Variorum. With the Prolegomena of Scriblerus (London: A. Dod, 1729).Google Scholar

Pratt, Aaron T., ‘Stab-Stitching and the Status of Early English Playbooks as Literature’, Lib., 7th series, 16/3 (September 2015): 304–28.Google Scholar

Prospectus for The Harvard Shakespeare (Boston, New York, Chicago: Ginn and Heath, n.d.).Google Scholar

Prospectus for Shakespeare for the School and Family (New York: Harper & Brothers, n.d.).Google Scholar

Prynne, William, Histrio–Mastix. The Players Scovrge, or, Actors Tragœdie, divided into two parts (London, 1633).Google Scholar

Purkis, James, Shakespeare and Manuscript Drama: Canon, Collaboration, and Text (Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Quiller-Couch, Arthur, Memories and Opinions (Cambridge University Press, 1945).Google Scholar

Ragg, Edward, ‘Controversies of the Iconic: Why do Publishers Produce Rival Editions of Classic Authors? The Oxford Shakespeare 1978–1987’, MA dissertation, Oxford Brookes University (1999).Google Scholar

Ragg, Edward, ‘The Oxford Shakespeare Re-Visited: An Interview with Professor Stanley Wells’, AEB, n.s., 12/2 (2001): 73–101.Google Scholar

Ragg, Edward, ‘Much Ado About Everything: Designing The Oxford Shakespeare: An Interview with Professor Paul Luna’, Typography Papers, 5 (2003).Google Scholar

Rankin, J. E., The Shakespearean Interpreter, with memorial words respecting Henry Norman Hudson (Middlebury, VT: n.p., 1886).Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Eric, ‘Anonymity and the Erasure of Shakespeare’s First Eighteenth-Century Editor’, in Gondris, (ed.), Reading Readings, 318–22.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Eric, ‘Anonymity and the Erasure of Shakespeare’s First Eighteenth-Century Editor’, in Gondris, The Shakespeare Thefts: In Search of the First Folios (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011)Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Eric, ‘Anonymity and the Erasure of Shakespeare’s First Eighteenth-Century Editor’, in Gondris, ‘Editorial Memory: The Origin and Evolution of Collation Notes’, in Kidnie, and Massai, (eds.), Shakespeare and Textual Studies, pp. 391–7.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Eric, ‘Anonymity and the Erasure of Shakespeare’s First Eighteenth-Century Editor’, in Gondris, ‘Editorial Memory: The Origin and Evolution of Collation Notes’, in Kidnie, and Massai, ‘Publishing the First Folio’, in Smith, Emma (ed.), Cambridge Companion, 18–29.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Eric and West, Anthony James et al. (eds.), The Shakespeare First Folios: A Descriptive Catalogue (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012).Google Scholar

Raven, James, The Business of Books: Booksellers and the English Book Trade 1450–1850 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Review of Bowdler’s edition (1820), ER, 1821: 52–4.Google Scholar

Review of Capell’s Notes and Various Readings, MR, December 1783: 483–8.Google Scholar

Review of Charles Knight’s Pictorial Edition, Dublin Review, November 1840: 316–31.Google Scholar

Review of J. O. Halliwell’s edition, Ath., 1340 (2 July 1853): 796–9.Google Scholar

Review of John Bell’s edition (1786–8), MR, Aug. 1788: 155–7.Google Scholar

Review of the Johnson-Steevens-Reed edition (1785), MR, August 1786: 81–94; September 1786: 161–9.Google Scholar

Review of Leslie, Jameson and Murray, Narrative of Discovery and Adventure in the Polar Seas and Regions, Ath., 152 (25 September 1830): 593.Google Scholar

Review of Pope’s edition, The Weekly Journal or Saturday’s Post (also known as Mist’s Journal), 20 March 1725: 2075–6. Further comments in the issue of 27 March: 2081.Google Scholar

Review of various Shakespeare editions, ER (1845): 329–84.Google Scholar

Review of various Shakespeare editions, ER (1856): 358–86.Google Scholar

Rhodes, Neil, ‘From Rhetoric to Belles Lettres’, in Crawford, Robert (ed.), The Scottish Invention of English Literature (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998): 22–36.Google Scholar

Rhodes, Neil and Sawday, Jonathan, The Renaissance Computer: Knowledge Technology in the First Age of Print (London: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar

Richardson, Samuel, An Address to the Public, on the Treatment which the Editor of the History of Sir Charles Grandison has met with from certain Booksellers and Printers in Dublin … (London, 1754).Google Scholar

Ritson, Joseph, Remarks, Critical and Illustrative on the Text and Notes of the Last Edition of Shakspeare (London: J. Johnson, 1783).Google Scholar

Ritson, Joseph, ‘The Genuine Text of Shakespeare. Preparing for the Press, an Edition of the Plays of William Shakspeare, with Notes’, included in Remarks (1783).Google Scholar

Ritson, Joseph, Cursory Criticisms on the Edition of Shakspeare Published by Edmond Malone (London: Hookham & Carpenter, 1792).Google Scholar

Rivington, Septimus, The Publishing Family of Rivington (London: Rivingtons, 1919).Google Scholar

Rizvi, Pervez, ‘The Use of Spellings for Compositor Attributions in the First Folio’, PBSA, 110/1 (March 2016): 1–54.Google Scholar

Roach, John, Public Examinations in England, 1850–1900 (Cambridge University Press, 1971).Google Scholar

Robbins, Robin, ‘… and the Counter-arguments’, TLS, 20 December 1985: 1450.Google Scholar

Robert and Andrew Foulis: An Exhibition in the Hunterian Museum to Commemorate the Silver Jubilee of the British Records Association (University of Glasgow, 1958).Google Scholar

Roberts, Jeanne Addison, ‘Women Edit Shakespeare’, SS, 59 (2006): 136–46.Google Scholar

Roberts, Sasha, Reading Shakespeare’s Poems in Early Modern England (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).Google Scholar

Robertson, J. M., The Genuine in Shakespeare: A Conspectus (London: Routledge, 1930).Google Scholar

Rodgers, Pat, ‘Pope and his Subscribers’, Publishing History, 3 (1978): 7–36.Google Scholar

Rose, Mark, ‘The Author as Proprietor: Donaldson v. Beckett and the Genealogy of Modern Authorship’, Representations, 23 (1988): 51–85.Google Scholar

Rose, Mark, Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Rosenbach, A. S. W., Books and Bidders: The Adventures of a Bibliophile (Boston: Little, Brown, 1927).Google Scholar

Rounce, Adam, ‘Editorial Annotations in Shakespeare Editions after 1733’, in Depledge, and Kirwan, (eds.), Canonising Shakespeare, 201–15.Google Scholar

Rowe, Katherine, ‘Living with Digital Incunables, or a “Good-enough” Shakespeare Text’, in Carson, and Kirwan, (eds.), Shakespeare and the Digital World, 144–59.Google Scholar

Rozett, Martha Tuck, Review of the Norton, Riverside and Bevington editions of Shakespeare, SQ, 48/4 (1997): 465–72.Google Scholar

Satchell, Thomas, ‘The Spelling of F1’, TLS, 3 June 1920: 352.Google Scholar

Savage, Henry L., ‘The Shakspere Society of Philadelphia’, SQ, 3 (1952): 341–51.Google Scholar

Scheide, William H., ‘The Earliest First Folio in America?’, SQ, 27 (1976): 332–3.Google Scholar

Scheil, Katherine West, She Hath Been Reading: Women and Shakespeare Clubs in America (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Schoenbaum, Samuel, William Shakespeare: A Documentary Life (New York: Oxford University Press/Scolar Press, 1975).Google Scholar

Schoenbaum, Samuel, Shakespeare’s Lives, 2nd edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Seary, Peter Lewis Theobald and the Editing of Shakespeare (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Sedelow, Sally Yeates, ‘The Computer in the Humanities and Fine Arts’, Computing Surveys, 2/2 (June 1970): 89–110.Google Scholar

Sen, Sailendra Kumar, ‘Malone’s Two Shakespeare Editions’, Lib., 5th series, 31 (1976): 390–1.Google Scholar

Shakespeare: An Exhibition of Printed Books (Edinburgh: National Library of Scotland, 1964).Google Scholar

‘Shakspeare’, The Bookseller, 29 February 1864: 92–3.Google Scholar

‘Shall Shakspeare Have a Monument?’, The Bookseller, 31 March 1864: 169.Google Scholar

Sherbo, Arthur, ‘Warburton and the 1745 “Shakespeare”’, Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 51 (1952): 71–82.Google Scholar

Sherbo, Arthur, Samuel Johnson, Editor of Shakespeare, Illinois Studies in Language and Literature 42 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1956).Google Scholar

Sherbo, Arthur, ‘George Steevens’ 1785 Variorum Shakespeare’, SB, 32 (1979): 241–6.Google Scholar

Sherbo, Arthur, The Birth of Shakespeare Studies: Commentators from Rowe (1709) to Boswell–Malone (1821) (East Lansing, MI: Colleagues, 1986).Google Scholar

Sherbo, Arthur, Isaac Reed, Editorial Factotum (Victoria, BC: University of Victoria Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Sherbo, Arthur, The Achievement of George Steevens (New York: Peter Lang, 1990).Google Scholar

Sherburn, George (ed.), The Correspondence of Alexander Pope, 5 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956).Google Scholar

Sherzer, Jane, ‘American Editions of Shakespeare: 1753–1866’, PMLA, 15 (1907): 633–96.Google Scholar

‘The Shilling Shakspeares’, The Bookseller, 1 July 1868: 451.Google Scholar

Siemens, Ray et al., ‘Toward Modeling the Social Edition: An Approach to Understanding the Electronic Scholarly Edition in the Context of New and Emerging Social Media’, Literary and Linguistic Computing, 27/4 (December 2012): 445–61.Google Scholar

Sillars, Stuart, The Illustrated Shakespeare, 1709–1875 (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Simon, Henry W., The Reading of Shakespeare in American Schools and Colleges: A Historical Survey (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1932).Google Scholar

Simpson, Percy, Shakespearian Punctuation (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1911).Google Scholar

Simpson, Richard, ‘Are there any Extant MSS. in Shakespeare’s Handwriting?’, Notes and Queries , 183 (July 1871): 1–3.Google Scholar

Singer, Samuel Weller, The Text of Shakespeare Vindicated from the Interpolations and Corruptions Advocated by John Payne Collier Esq. in His Notes and Emendations (London: William Pickering, 1853).Google Scholar

Sinker, Robert, Biographical Notes on the Librarians of Trinity College (Cambridge Antiquarian Society, 1897).Google Scholar

Sisson, Charles J., ‘Shakespeare Quartos as Prompt-Copies with Some Account of Cholmeley’s Players and a New Shakespeare Allusion’, RES, 18/70 (1942): 129–43.Google Scholar

Sisson, Charles J., New Readings in Shakespeare, 2 vols. (Cambridge University Press, 1956).Google Scholar

Skinner, R. T., A Notable Family of Scots Printers (Edinburgh: Constable Press, 1928).Google Scholar

Smith, Bruce R., ‘Getting Back to the Library, Getting Back to the Body’, in Carson, and Kirwan, (eds.), Shakespeare and the Digital World, 24–32.Google Scholar

Smith, D. Nichol, Shakespeare in the Eighteenth Century (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1928).Google Scholar

Smith, Emma, ‘Ghost Writing: Hamlet and the Ur-Hamlet’, in Murphy, (ed.), Renaissance Text, 177–90.Google Scholar

Smith, Emma, ‘Ghost Writing: Hamlet and the Ur-Hamlet’, in Murphy, The Making of Shakespeare’s First Folio (Oxford: Bodleian Library, 2015).Google Scholar

Smith, Emma, ‘Ghost Writing: Hamlet and the Ur-Hamlet’, in Murphy, Shakespeare’s First Folio: Four Centuries of an Iconic Book (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Smith, Emma, ‘Ghost Writing: Hamlet and the Ur-Hamlet’, in Murphy, ‘The Hero, the Villain, the Princess, and the Book: Stories about the First Folio’, CÉ, 93/1 (2017): 77–89.Google Scholar

Smith, Emma, ‘Ghost Writing: Hamlet and the Ur-Hamlet’, in Murphy, (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare’s First Folio (Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Smith, Hallett, ‘“No Cloudy Stuffe to Puzzell Intellect”: A Testimonial Misapplied to Shakespeare’, SQ, 1/1 (January 1950): 18–21.Google Scholar

Smith, Helen, ‘“To London all”? Mapping Shakespeare in Print, 1593–1598’, in Kidnie, and Massai, (eds.), Shakespeare and Textual Studies, 69–86.Google Scholar

Smith, John Hazel, ‘Styan Thirlby’s Shakespearean Commentaries: A Corrective Analysis’, Shakespeare Studies, 11 (1978): 219–41.Google Scholar

Smith, MacKenzie, ‘DynaText: An Electronic Publishing System’, C&H, 27/5–6 (1993–4): 415–20.Google Scholar

Smith, Steven Escar, ‘“The Eternal Verities Verified”: Charlton Hinman and the Roots of Mechanical Collation’, SB, 53 (2000): 129–61.Google Scholar

Spevack, Marvin, James Orchard Halliwell-Phillipps: A Classified Bibliography (Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1997).Google Scholar

Spevack, Marvin, James Orchard Halliwell-Phillipps: The Life and Works of the Shakespearean Scholar and Bookman (Delaware and London: Oak Knoll Press and Shepheard-Walwyn, 2001).Google Scholar

Steele, Kenneth B., ‘“Look What Thy Memory Cannot Contain”: The Shakespeare Electronic Text Archive’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 7/5 (September–October 1989): 25–8, https://extra.shu.ac.uk/emls/iemls/shaksper/files/WCRUNCHR%20SHAKSPER.txt.Google Scholar