Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface to the first edition
- Preface to the second edition
- Acknowledgements
- Notation
- Acronyms and abbreviations
- Part 1 Reinforced concrete
- Part 2 Prestressed concrete
- 12 Introduction to prestressed concrete
- 13 Critical stress state analysis of beams
- 14 Critical stress state design of beams
- 15 Ultimate strength analysis of beams
- 16 End blocks for prestressing anchorages
- Appendix A Elastic neutral axis
- Appendix B Critical shear perimeter
- Appendix C Strut-and-tie modelling of concrete structures
- Appendix D Australian Standard precast prestressed concrete bridge girder sections
- References
- Index
13 - Critical stress state analysis of beams
from Part 2 - Prestressed concrete
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface to the first edition
- Preface to the second edition
- Acknowledgements
- Notation
- Acronyms and abbreviations
- Part 1 Reinforced concrete
- Part 2 Prestressed concrete
- 12 Introduction to prestressed concrete
- 13 Critical stress state analysis of beams
- 14 Critical stress state design of beams
- 15 Ultimate strength analysis of beams
- 16 End blocks for prestressing anchorages
- Appendix A Elastic neutral axis
- Appendix B Critical shear perimeter
- Appendix C Strut-and-tie modelling of concrete structures
- Appendix D Australian Standard precast prestressed concrete bridge girder sections
- References
- Index
Summary
ASSUMPTIONS
By definition, a fully prestressed beam sustains neither tensile cracking nor overstress in compression, under any given service load. Achieving these no-crack and no-overstress conditions throughout the working life of a beam – when prestress losses occur instantaneously and continuously – is a complicated problem. The critical stress state (CSS) approach presented in this chapter provides a fool-proof solution to this otherwise intractable problem. It is a linear–elastic method and is valid subject to the following assumptions:
The plane section remains plane after bending.
The material behaves elastically.
The beam section is homogenous and uncracked.
The principle of superposition holds.
Note that the CSS approach is suitable for partially prestressed beams sustaining tensile stresses below the concrete cracking strength (see Section 12.5).
NOTATION
Figure 13.2(1)a illustrates a typical section of a prestressed I-shaped bridge beam. It may be idealised as shown in Figure 13.2(1)b in which the resultant H of the individual prestressing forces is located at the effective centre of prestress, or with an eccentricity (eB) from the neutral axis (NA). The effective centre is the centre of gravity (action) of the individual prestressing forces. Its location, or the value of ℯB, can be determined by simple statics.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Reinforced and Prestressed ConcreteAnalysis and Design with Emphasis on Application of AS3600-2009, pp. 389 - 411Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013