Capelle, W. 1907. Die Schrift Von der Welt: Ein Weltbild im Umriss aus dem 1. Jahrhundert nach Chr. (Jena: Diedrichs).Google Scholar

Federspiel, M. 2018. Pseudo-Aristote, Du monde. Positions et dénominations des vents. Des plantes (Paris: Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Festugière, A.-J. 1949. La Révélation d’Hermès Trismégiste, vol. 2: Le Dieu cosmique (Paris: Lecoffre).Google Scholar

Forster, E. S. 1914. Aristotle, De mundo. The Works of Aristotle Translated into English, vol. 3 (Oxford: Clarendon Press); revised by Barnes, J (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 1 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984), 626–40.Google Scholar

Furley, D. J. 1955. Aristotle: On Sophistical Refutations. On Coming-to-be and Passing-away. On the Cosmos (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Gohlke, P. 1949. Aristoteles an König Alexander über die Welt (Paderborn: Schöningh).Google Scholar

Kap, J. C. 1792. Aristotelis De mundo liber (Altenburg: Richter).Google Scholar

Lorimer, W. L. 1933. Aristotelis qui fertur libellus de mundo (Paris: Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Reale, G. 1974. Aristotele: Trattato sul Cosmo per Alessandro (Naples: Loffredo).Google Scholar

Reale, G. and Bos, A. P. 1995. Il trattato Sul cosmo per Alessandro attribuito ad Aristotele (Milan: Vita e Pensiero).Google Scholar

Schönberger, O. 1991. Aristoteles: Über die Welt (Stuttgart: Reclam).Google Scholar

Strohm, H. 1970. Aristoteles: Meteorologie. Über die Welt (Berlin: Akademie Verlag).Google Scholar

Thom, J. C. 2014. Cosmic Order and Divine Power: Pseudo-Aristotle, On the Cosmos (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).Google Scholar

Tricot, J. 1949. Aristote: Traité du ciel. Suivi du traité pseudo-aristotélicien Du monde (Paris: Vrin).Google Scholar

Adamson, P. 2015. ‘State of Nature: Human and Cosmic Rulership in Ancient Philosophy’, in Kellner, B and Höfele, A (eds.), Menschennatur und politische Ordnung (Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink), 79–94.Google Scholar

Algra, K. 1988. ‘The Early Stoics on the Immobility and Coherence of the Cosmos’, Phronesis 33, 155–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Algra, K. 1995. Concepts of Space in Greek Thought (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Arnott, W. G. 1996. Alexis: The Fragments. A Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Audi, R. (ed.) 1999. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Aujac, G. 1966. Strabon et la science de son temps: Les sciences du monde (Paris: Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Aujac, G. 1969. Strabon, Géographie, Tome I, 2e partie (Livre 2) (Paris: Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Aujac, G. 1972. ‘Les Traités “Sur l’Océan” et les Zones Terrestres’, Revue des Études Anciennes 74, 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Badian, E. 1958. ‘The Eunuch Bagoas’, Classical Quarterly 8, 144–57.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. 1977. ‘Review of G. Reale, Trattato sul Cosmo per Alessandro’, Classical Review 27, 40–3.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (ed.) 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 1 (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Beare, J. I. 1906. Greek Theories of Elemental Cognition from Alcmaeon to Aristotle (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, T. 2006. Faire usage: La pratique du stoïcisme (Paris: Vrin).Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, T. 2009. ‘How Industrious Can Zeus Be? The Extent and Objects of Divine Activity in Stoicism’, in Salles, R (ed.), God and Cosmos in Stoicism (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, H. 1880. Die geographische Fragmente des Eratosthenes (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar

Berger, H. 1903. Geschichte der wissenschaftlichen Erdkunde der Griechen (Leipzig: Veit).Google Scholar

Bernabé, A. 2004. Poetae epici Graeci: Testimonia et fragmenta, vol. 2.1: Orphicorum et Orphicis similium testimonia et fragmenta (München–Leipzig: Saur).Google Scholar

Bernabé, A. 2010. ‘El Himno a Zeus Órfico: Vicisitudes literarias, ideológicas y religiosas’, in Bernabé, A, Casadesús, F, Santamaría, M. A. (eds.), Orfeo y el orfismo: Nuevas perspectivas (Alicante), www.cervantesvirtual.com/obra/orfeo-y-el-orfismo-nuevas-perspectivas–0/ (last accessed 1 March 2019), 67–97.Google Scholar

Berryman, S. 2003. ‘Ancient Automata and Mechanical Explanation’, Phronesis 48, 344–69.Google Scholar

Besnier, B. 2003. ‘De mundo: Tradition grecque’, Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques. Supplément, 478–80.Google Scholar

Betegh, G. 2004. The Derveni Papyrus: Cosmology, Theology and Interpretation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Betegh, G. and Gregorić, P. 2014. ‘Multiple Analogy in Ps.Aristotle, De mundo Ch. 6’, Classical Quarterly 64, 574–91.Google Scholar

Bianchetti, S. 1997. ‘Per la datazione del Περὶ ὠκεανοῦ di Pitea di Massalia’, Sileno 23, 73–85.Google Scholar

Bianchetti, S. 1998. Pitea di Massalia: L’Oceano (Pisa–Rome: Istituti editoriali e poligrafici internazionali).Google Scholar

Bianchetti, S. 2011. ‘I Greci e il “mare esterno”: dalle esplorazioni delle aree estreme alla rappresentazione “scientifica” dell’ecumene’, in Santos Yanguas, J and Díaz Ariño, B (eds.), Los griegos y el mar (Vitoria–Gasteiz: Universidad del País Vasco), 155–72.Google Scholar

Biffi, N. 2009. L’Anatolia Meridionale in Strabone: Libro XIV della Geografia (Bari: Edipuglia).Google Scholar

Bobzien, S. 1998. Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Bodéüs, R. 2000. Aristotle and the Theology of Living Immortals (New York: SUNY Press).Google Scholar

Bodnár, I. 2002. ‘Eudemus’ Unmoved Movers: Fragments 121–123b’, in Bodnár, I and Fortenbaugh, W (eds.), Eudemus of Rhodes (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press), 171–89.Google Scholar

Bolchert, P. 1908. Aristoteles Erdkunde von Asien und Libyen (Berlin: Weidmann).Google Scholar

Boot, P. 1981. ‘An Indication for the Date of the Pseudo-Aristotelian Treatise De mundo’, Mnemosyne 34, 139–40.Google Scholar

Bos, A. P. 1978. ‘Review of G. Reale, Trattato sul Cosmo per Alessandro’, Vigiliae Christianae 32, 66–9.Google Scholar

Bos, A. P. 1991. ‘Supplementary Notes on the De mundo’, Hermes 119, 312–32.Google Scholar

Bosworth, A. B. 1970. ‘Aristotle and Callisthenes’, Historia 19, 407–13.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. 1997. ‘Locating the Cosmos: An Academic Argument against Chrysippus’, Mnemosyne 50, 577–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brisson, L. 1995. Orphée et l’Orphisme dans l’Antiquité gréco-romaine (Aldershot: Variorum), no. IV: ‘Orphée et l’orphisme à l’époque impériale: Témoignage et intéprétation philosophique, de Plutarque à Jamblique’; no. V: ‘Damascius et l’orphisme’.Google Scholar

Broche, G. 1935. Pythéas le Massaliote, découvreur de l’Extrême-Occident et du Nord de l’Europe (IV^e siècle av. J. C.) (Paris: Société française d’imprimerie et de librerie).Google Scholar

Brodersen, K. 1994. Dionysios von Alexandria: Das Lied von der Welt. Zweisprachige Ausgabe von Kai Brodersen (Hildesheim–Zurich–New York: Olms).Google Scholar

Brodersen, K. 2000. ‘Patrokles [3]’, Der neue Pauly, vol. 9, 418.Google Scholar

Bucciantini, V. 2002. ‘L’isola del Sole nel Periplo di Nearco: Problemi d’identificazione e rappresentazione’, Orbis Terrarum 8, 49–58.Google Scholar

Bucciantini, V. 2015. Studio su Nearco di Creta. Dalla descrizione geografica alla narrazione storica (Alessandria: Orso).Google Scholar

Bunbury, E. H. 1959. A History of Ancient Geography, 2 vols. (New York: Dover).Google Scholar

Burkert, W. 1972. Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism (Boston: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Burkert, W. 1985. Greek Religion, trans. Raffan, J (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Burri, R. 2014. ‘The Geography of De mundo’, in Thom, J. C. (ed.), Cosmic Order and Divine Power: Pseudo-Aristotle, On the Cosmos (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 89–106.Google Scholar

Callieri, P. 2001. ‘La presunta via commerciale tra l’India e Roma attraverso l’Oxus e il Mar Caspio: Nuovi dati di discussione’, Topoi 11, 537–46.Google Scholar

Capelle, W. 1905. ‘Die Schrift Von der Welt: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der griechischen Popularphilosophie’, Neue Jahrbücher für das Klassische Altertum 15, 529–68.Google Scholar

Cataudella, M. R. 2003. ‘Aristotele e la paternità del De mundo: Aspetti del pensiero geografico (3, 392b)’, in ΕΡΚΟΣ: Studi in onore di Franco Sartori (Padua: Sargon), 63–71.Google Scholar

Chandler, C. 2014. ‘Didactic Purpose and Discursive Strategies in On the Cosmos’, in Thom, J. C. (ed.), Cosmic Order and Divine Power: Pseudo-Aristotle, On the Cosmos (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 69–87.Google Scholar

Chiesara, M. L. 2001. Aristocles of Messene: Testimonies and Fragments (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Clay, J. S. 2003. Hesiod’s Cosmos (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Conche, M. 1998. Héraclite: Fragments, 4th ed. (Paris: Presses universitaires de France).Google Scholar

Cornford, F. M. 1937. Plato’s Cosmology: The Timaeus of Plato (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Cumont, F. 1935. ‘Les noms des planètes et l’astrolatrie chez les Grecs’, L’Antiquité Classique 4, 5–43.Google Scholar

Daffinà, P. 1968. ‘Aral, Caspio, Tanais’, Rivista degli studi orientali 43, 363–78.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. 2013. Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking (New York: Norton).Google Scholar

Diels, H. 1904. ‘Laterculi alexandrini aus einem Papyrus ptolemäischer Zeit’, Abhandlungen der königlichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 2, 1–16.Google Scholar

Dihle, A. 1997. ‘Die Geographie der Schrift vom Kosmos’, Geographia antiqua 6, 5–12.Google Scholar

Diller, A. 1949. ‘Measurements of the Earth’, Isis 40, 6–9.Google Scholar

Dion, R. 1977. Aspectes politiques de la géographie antique (Paris: Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. 1982. Il buon re secondo Omero (Naples: Bibliopolis).Google Scholar

du Toit, D. 2015. ‘Δυναμις εἰς σωτηρίαν: Röm 1,16 und Pseudo-Aristoteles De mundo 6, 398b 6–10 im Horizont antiker Diskurse über Entstehung, Bedrohung und Erhaltung der Welt’, in Breytenbach, C (ed.), Paul’s Graeco-Roman Context (Leuven–Paris: Peeters), 457–70.Google Scholar

Duhot, J. 1990. ‘Aristotélisme et Stoicisme dans le Περὶ κόσμου pseudo-aristotélicienne’, Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 8, 191–228.Google Scholar

Düring, I. 1944. Aristotle’s Chemical Treatise: Meteorologica Book IV, with Introduction and Commentary (Göteborg: Göteborgs Högskolas Årsskrift 50).Google Scholar

Eastwood, B. S. 1992. ‘Heraclides and Heliocentrism: Texts, Diagrams, and Interpretations’, Journal for the History of Astronomy 23/4, 233–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edelstein, L. and Kidd, I. G. 1988. Posidonius, vol. 1: The Fragments; vol. 2: The Commentary: (i) Testimonia and Fragments 1–149; (ii) Fragments 150–293 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Ehlers, W. W. 1985. ‘Mit dem Südwestmonsun nach Ceylon: Eine Interpretation der Iambul-Exzerpte Diodors’, Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumwissenschaft 11, 73–84.Google Scholar

Endsjø, D. Ø. 1997. ‘Placing the Unplaceable: The Making of Apollonius’ Argonautic Geography’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 38, 373–85.Google Scholar

Engels, D. W. 1978. Alexander the Great and the Logistics of the Macedonian Army (Berkeley–Los Angeles–London: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Fabre, P. 1975. ‘Étude sur Pythéas le Massaliote et l’époque de ses travaux’, Les Études Classiques 43, 25–44.Google Scholar

Falcon, A. 2005. Aristotle and the Science of Nature: Unity without Uniformity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. (eds.) 2002. Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Fronterotta, R. 2013. Eraclito: Frammenti (Milan: BUR).Google Scholar

Furley, D. J. 1956. ‘The Early History of the Concept of Soul’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 3, 1–18.Google Scholar

Galzerano, M. 2018. ‘Misquoting Sophocles’ Oedipus Tyrranus: A New Proof of the Inauthenticity of Ps.-Aristotle, On the Cosmos’, Classical Quarterly 68, 733–5.Google Scholar

Gernez, D. 1941. ‘Les périples des anciens grecs et leurs rapports avec les livres d’instructions nautiques’, Academie de Marine Belgique 4, 1–19.Google Scholar

Geus, K., 2000. ‘Utopie und Geographie: Zum Weltbild der Griechen in frühhellenistischer Zeit’, Orbis terrarum 6, 55–90.Google Scholar

Geus, K. 2002. Eratosthenes von Kyrene: Studien zur hellenistischen Kultur- und Wissenschaftsgeschichte (Munich: C. H. Beck).Google Scholar

Geus, K. 2004. ‘Measuring the Earth and the Oikoumene’, in Talbert, R and Brodersen, K (eds.), Space in the Roman World: Its Perception and Presentation (Münster: LIT Verlag), 11–26.Google Scholar

Gilbert, O. 1907. Die meteorologischen Theorien des griechischen Altertums (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar

Gisinger, F. 1921. Die Erdbeschreibung des Eudoxos von Knidos (Leipzig–Berlin: Teubner).Google Scholar

Gisinger, F. 1937. ‘Periplus’, Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, vol. 19.1, 841–50.Google Scholar

Gisinger, F. 1949. ‘Patrokles 5’, Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, vol. 18.4, 2263–73.Google Scholar

Gohlke, P. 1936. ‘Aristoteles an Alexander über das Weltall’, Neue Jahrbücher für Wissenschaft und Jugendbildung 12, 323–35.Google Scholar

González Ponce, F. J. 1995. Avieno y el periplo (Écija: Editorial Gráficas Sol).Google Scholar

González Ponce, F. J. 1998. ‘El corpus periplográfico griego y sus integrantes más antiguos: Épocas arcaica y clásica’, in Pérez Jiménez, A and Cruz, G Andreotti (eds.), Los límites de la tierra: El espacio geográfico en las culturas mediterráneas (Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas), 41–76.Google Scholar

González Ponce, F. J. 2008. Periplógrafos griegos I. Épocas Arcaica y Clásica 1: Periplo de Hanón y autores de los siglos VI y V a.C. (Zaragoza: Prensas Universitarias).Google Scholar

Gottschalk, H. B. 1987. ‘Aristotelian Philosophy in the Roman World from the Time of Cicero to the End of the Second Century a.d.’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 36.2, 1079–174.Google Scholar

Gregorić, P. 2016. ‘Review of J. C. Thom (ed.), Cosmic Order and Divine Power: Pseudo-Aristotle, On the Cosmos’, Classical Review 66, 68–70.Google Scholar

Gregorić, P. 2020. ‘The Origin and the Instrument of Animal Motion: De motu animalium Chapters 9–10’, in Rapp, C and Primavesi, O (eds.), Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium: Proceedings of the XIXth Symposium Aristotelicum (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Gregorić, P. and Kuhar, M. 2014. ‘Aristotle’s Physiology of Animal Motion: On Neura and Muscles’, Apeiron 47, 94–115.Google Scholar

Guggenberger, R. 2016. Kritische Edition der Zitate aus und Allusionen auf Homer, Aischylos, Sophokles und Euripides bei Aristoteles, samt Kommentaren und quantitativer Auswertung (Doctoral dissertation, University of Vienna).Google Scholar

Hadot, P. 2004. Le Voile d’Isis: Essai sur l’histoire de l’idée de Nature (Paris: Gallimard); The Veil of Isis: An Essay on the History of the Idea of Nature, trans. M. Chase (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Hahm, H. 1977. The Origins of Stoic Cosmology (Columbus: Ohio State University Press).Google Scholar

Hall, C. M. 1923. Nicolaus of Damascus’ Life of Augustus: A Historical Commentary Embodying a Translation (Menasha, WI: George Banta).Google Scholar

Hamilton, J. R. 1971. ‘Alexander and the Aral’, Classical Quarterly 21, 106–111.Google Scholar

Happ, H. 1968. ‘Weltbild und Seinslehre bei Aristoteles’, Antike und Abendland 14, 72–91.Google Scholar

Hebert, B. 1986. ‘Attische Gelehrsamkeit in einem alexandrinischen Papyrus? Bemerkungen und Vorschläge zu den Künstlerkanones der Laterculi Alexandrini’, Tyche 1, 127–31.Google Scholar

Heidel, W. A. 1937. The Frame of the Ancient Greek Maps (New York: American Geographical Society).Google Scholar

Heilen, S. 2000. ‘Eudoxos von Knidos und Pytheas von Massalia’, in Hübner, W (ed.), Geschichte der Mathematik und der Naturwissenschaften in der Antike, vol. 2: Geographie und verwandte Wissenschaften (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2005. ‘Embryological Models in Ancient Philosophy’, Phronesis 50, 1–42.Google Scholar

Hladký, V. (ed.) 2011. Papyrus Derveni (Červený Kostelec: Pavel Mervart).Google Scholar

Holwerda, D. 1993. ‘Textkritisches und Exegetisches zur pseudo-Aristotelischen Schrift Περὶ τοῦ κόσμου’, Mnemosyne 46, 46–55.Google Scholar

Horák, B. 1931. La question de la connaissance du lac d’Aral dans l’antiquité (Brno: Spisy odboru Československé společnosti zeměpisné v Brně).Google Scholar

Huffman, C. A. 1993. Philolaus of Croton: Pythagorean and Presocratic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Humboldt, A. von 1848. Cosmos: A Sketch of the Physical Description of the Universe, vol. 1, trans. Otté, E. C. (London: Henry G. Bohn).Google Scholar

Humboldt, A. von 1852. Cosmos: A Sketch of the Physical Description of the Universe, vol. 4, trans. Otté, E. C. and Paul, B. H. (London: Henry G. Bohn).Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. 1995. ‘Written in the Stars: Poetry and Philosophy in the Phaenomena of Aratus’, Arachnion 2, 1–34.Google Scholar

Ierodiakonou, K. 2005. ‘Empedocles on Colours and Colour Vision’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29, 1–37.Google Scholar

Ierodiakonou, K. 2011. ‘Remarks on the History of an Ancient Thought Experiment’, in Ierodiakonou, K and Roux, S (eds.), Thought Experiments in Methodological and Historical Contexts (Leiden: Brill), 37–49.Google Scholar

Ilyushechkina, E. 2010. Studien zu Dionysios von Alexandria (Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen).Google Scholar

Jacob, C. 1990. La Description de la terre habitée de Denys d’Alexandrie ou la leçon de géographie (Paris: Albin Michel).Google Scholar

Jaeger, W. 1923. Grundlegung einer Geschichte seiner Entwicklung (Berlin: Weidmann).Google Scholar

Janko, R. 2008. ‘Reconstructing (Again) the Opening of the Derveni Papyrus’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 166, 37–51.Google Scholar

Janni, P. 1984. La mappa e il periplo: Cartografia antica e spazio odologico (Rome: Bretschneider).Google Scholar

Janni, P. 1996. Il mare degli antichi (Bari: Dedalo).Google Scholar

Janni, P. 2016. ‘The Sea of the Greeks and Romans’, in Bianchetti, S, Cataudella, M. R. and Gehrke, H. J (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Ancient Geography. The Inhabited World in Greek and Roman Tradition (Leiden–Boston: Brill), 21–42.Google Scholar

Jensen, P. J. and Waszink, J. H. (eds.) 1975. Timaeus a Calcidio translatus commentarioque instructus (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Jones, R. M. 1926. ‘Posidonius and the Flight of the Mind through the Universe’, Classical Philology 21, 97–113.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. H. 1979. The Art and Thought of Heraclitus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Karamanolis, G. 2006. Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Karttunen, K. 1997. India and the Hellenistic World (Helsinki: Finnish Oriental Society).Google Scholar

Keaney, J. J. and Lamberton, R. (eds.) 1996. [Plutarch]: Essay on the Life and Poetry of Homer (Atlanta: Scholars Press).Google Scholar

Keyser, P. T. 2001. ‘The Geographical Work of Dikaiarchos’, in Fortehbaugh, W. W. and Schütrumpf, E (eds.), Dicaearchus of Messana: Text, Translation and Discussion (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press).Google Scholar

Keyser, P. T. 2009. ‘Heliocentrism in or out of Heraclides’, in Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Pender, E. E. (eds.), Heraclides of Pontus: discussion (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers), 205–35.Google Scholar

Kidd, D. A. 1997. Aratus: Phaenomena (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Kidd, I. 1978. ‘Philosophy and Science in Posidonius’, Antike und Abendland 24, 7–15.Google Scholar

Kidd, I. 1988. Posidonius, vol. 2: The Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Kidd, I. 1992. ‘Theophrastus’ Meteorology, Aristotle and Posidonius’, in Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Gutas, D (eds.), Theophrastus: His Psychological, Doxographical and Scientific Writings (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press).Google Scholar

Kirk, G. S. 1954. Heraclitus: The Cosmic Fragments (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E. and Schofield, M. 1983. The Presocratic Philosophers, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Kotwick, M. E. 2017. Der Papyrus von Derveni (Berlin–Boston: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Kouremenos, T., Parássoglou, G. and Tsantsanoglou, K. (eds.) 2006. The Derveni Papyrus (Florence: Olschki).Google Scholar

Kragh, H. 1999. Cosmology and Controversy: The Historical Development of Two Theories of the Universe (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Kraye, J. 1990. ‘Aristotle’s God and the Authenticity of De mundo: An Early Modern Controversy’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 28, 339–58.Google Scholar

Kraye, J. 2014. ‘Disputes over the Authorship of De mundo between Humanism and Altertumwissenschaft’, in Thom, J. C. (ed.), Cosmic Order and Divine Power: Pseudo-Aristotle, On the Cosmos (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 181–97.Google Scholar

Larson, J. 2007. Ancient Greek Cults: A Guide (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar

Lasserre, F. 1966. Eudoxos von Knidos (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Lightfoot, J. L. 2014. Dionysius Periegetes, Description of the Known World: With Introduction, Text, Translation and Commentary (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1966. Polarity and Analogy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Lloyd-Jones, H. 1983. The Justice of Zeus, 2nd ed. (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Lorimer, W. L. 1924. The Text Tradition of Pseudo-Aristotle “De mundo” (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Lorimer, W. L. 1925. Some Notes on the Text of Pseudo-Aristotle “De mundo” (Oxford: Humphrey Milford).Google Scholar

Magnani, S. 1995. ‘Le isole occidentali e l’itinerario piteano’, Sileno 21, 83–102.Google Scholar

Magnani, S. 2002. Il viaggio di Pitea sull’ Oceano (Bologna: Pàtron).Google Scholar

Maguire, J. P. 1939. ‘The Sources of Pseudo-Aristotle De mundo’, Yale Classical Studies 6, 111–67.Google Scholar

Mair, G. R. 1955. Callimachus: Hymns and Epigrams. Lycophron. Aratus (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. 1991. ‘Two Attributions’, Classical Quarterly 41, 541–4.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. 1992. ‘ΠΕΡΙ ΚΟΣΜΟΥ: A Note on the History of a Title’, Vigiliae Christianae 46, 391–411.Google Scholar

Marcovich, M. 2001. Heraclitus: Greek Text with a Short Commentary, 2nd ed. (Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag).Google Scholar

Martin, A. and Primavesi, O. 1999. L’Empédocle de Strasbourg (Strasbourg–Berlin–New York: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Martin, J. 1998. Aratos: Phénomènes, 2 vols (Paris: Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

McDiarmid, J. B. 1940. ‘Theophrastus on the Eternity of the World’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 71, 239–47.Google Scholar

McPhail, C. and Hannah, R. 2008–11. ‘Eratosthenes’ Perception of the Caspian Sea: A Gulf or an Inland Sea?’, Orbis Terrarum 10, 155–72.Google Scholar

Medas, S. 2004. De rebus nauticis: L’ arte della navigazione nel mondo antico (Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider).Google Scholar

Meineke, A. 1852. Vindiciarum strabonianarum liber (Berlin: Nicolai).Google Scholar

Milne, H. J. M. 1934. Greek Shorthand Manuals: Syllabary and Commentary (London: Egypt Exploration Society).Google Scholar

Moraux, P. 1984. Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen, vol. 2 (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Most, G. W. (ed.) 2007. Hesiod: Theogony. Works and Days. Testimonia (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Muñoz Pascual, A. 2012. Estudios sobre la Descripción de la tierra habitada de Dionisio el Periegeta (Doctoral dissertation, University of Murcia).Google Scholar

Nagle, D. B. 2006. The Household as the Foundation of Aristotle’s Polis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Neugebauer, O. 1975. A History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy (Berlin–New York: Springer).Google Scholar

Nock, A. D. 1931. ‘Kornutus’, Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, Supplementband 5, cols. 995–1005.Google Scholar

Norden, E. 1893. ‘Beitrage zur Geschichte der Griechischen Philosophie’, no. V: ‘Über den Streit des Theophrast und Zeno bei Philo’, Jahrbücher für Classische Philologie, Supplementband 19, 440–52.Google Scholar

Onnasch, E.-O. 1996. ‘Die Aitherlehre in De mundo und ihre Aristotelizität’, Hermes 124, 170–91.Google Scholar

Pallí Bonet, J. 1992. Aristóteles: Investigación sobre los animales (Madrid: Gredos).Google Scholar

Pearson, L. 1951. ‘Notes on Two Passages of Strabo’, Classical Quarterly 1 (N.S.), 80–5.Google Scholar

Pearson, L. 1960. The Lost Histories of Alexander the Great (New York: American Philological Association).Google Scholar

Pecker, J. and Kaufman, S. 2001. Understanding the Heavens: Thirty Centuries of Astronomical Ideas from Ancient Thinking to Modern Cosmology (Berlin–London: Springer).Google Scholar

Pender, E. E. 2000. Images of Persons Unseen: Plato’s Metaphors for the Gods and the Soul (Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag).Google Scholar

Philippson, R. 1931. ‘Athenodoros’, Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, Supplementband 5, cols. 47–55.Google Scholar

Piano, V. 2013. ‘ Ὀλυμπος καὶ χρόνος τὸ αὐτό: Sulle tracce del tempo nel papiro di Derveni’, in Di Donato, R (ed.), Origini e svolgimento del pensiero greco: Studi per Jean-Pierre Vernant (Pisa: Edizioni ETS), 49–67.Google Scholar

Piano, V. 2016. Il papiro di Derveni tra religione e filosofia (Florence: Olschki).Google Scholar

Platnauer, M. 1921. ‘Greek Colour-Perception’, Classical Quarterly 15, 153–62.Google Scholar

Pohlenz, M. 1948. Die Stoa, vol. 1 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar

Prandi, L. 1985. Callistene: Uno storico tra Aristotele e i re macedoni (Milan: JACA).Google Scholar

Primavesi, O. 2008. Empedokles Physika I (Berlin–New York: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Prontera, F. 2007–8. ‘Centro e periferia nei mappamondi greci’, Geographia antiqua 16–17, 177–87.Google Scholar

Quandt, W. 1955. Orphei hymni (Berlin: Weidmann).Google Scholar

Ramelli, I. (ed.) 2003. Anneo Cornuto: Compendio di teologia greca (Milan: Bompiani).Google Scholar

Ramelli, I. and Luccheti, G. 2004. Allegoria, vol. 1: L’età classica (Milan: Vita e pensiero).Google Scholar

Raschieri, A. A. 2004. Dionigi d’Alessandria, il Periegeta: Guida delle Terre Abitate (Alessandria: Edizioni dell’ Orso).Google Scholar

Rathmann, M. 2007. ‘Wahrnehmung und Erfassung geographischer Räume im Hellenismus am Beispiel Asiens’, in Rathmann, M (ed.), Wahrnehmung und Erfassung geographischer Räume in der Antike (Mainz: Von Zabern), 81–102.Google Scholar

Rehm, A. 1916. Griechische Windrosen (Munich: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philos.-philol. und hist. Kl.).Google Scholar

Reinhardt, K. 1912. ‘Hekataios von Abdera und Demokrit’, Hermes 47, 492–513.Google Scholar

Ricciardelli, G. 2009. ‘Zeus, primo e ultimo’, Paideia 64, 423–35.Google Scholar

Ringshausen, K. W. 1929. Poseidonios–Asklepiodot–Seneca und ihre Anschauungen über Erdbeben und Vulkane (Doctoral dissertation, University of Munich).Google Scholar

Roller, D. W. 2010. Eratosthenes’ Geography: Fragments Collected and Translated, with Commentary and Additional Material (Princeton–Oxford: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Romm, J. 1994. The Edges of the Earth in Ancient Thought: Geography, Exploration, and Fiction (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Roseman, C. H. 1990. Pytheas of Massalia: On the Ocean (Chicago: Ares).Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. 1949. Aristotle, 5th revised ed. (London: Methuen).Google Scholar

Ruge, W. 1895. ‘Arabicus sinus’, Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, vol. 2.1, cols. 362–3.Google Scholar

Sanz Morales, M. 1993. ‘Las citas homéricas contenidas en el tratado De mundo, atribuido a Aristóteles, prueba de su inautenticidad’, Vichiana 4, 38–47.Google Scholar

Schenkeveld, D. M. 1991. ‘Language and Style of the Aristotelian De mundo in Relation to the Question of its Inauthenticity’, Elenchos 12, 221–55.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 2000. ‘Metaphysics Λ 10’, in Frede, M and Charles, D (eds.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Lambda (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 327–50.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. 2001. ‘Aristotelian Theology after Aristotle’, in Frede, D and Laks, A (eds.), Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, its Background and Aftermath (Leiden: Brill), 1–40.Google Scholar

Shipton, K. M. W. 1985. ‘Heraclitus fr. 10: A Musical Interpretation’ Phronesis 30, 111–30.Google Scholar

Smith, A. 2014. ‘The Reception of On the Cosmos in Ancient Pagan Philosophy’, in Thom, J. C. (ed.), Cosmic Order and Divine Power: Pseudo-Aristotle, On the Cosmos (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 121–31.Google Scholar

Snyder, J. M. 1984. ‘The Harmonia of the Bow and the Lyre in Heraclitus Fr. 51 (DK)’, Phronesis 29, 91–5.Google Scholar

Stähelin, F. 1921. ‘Seleukos 2’, Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, vol. 2.A.1, cols. 1208, 1234.Google Scholar

Strohm, H. 1952. ‘Studien zur Schrift von der Welt’, Museum Helveticum 9, 137–75.Google Scholar

Strohm, H. 1987. ‘Ps. Aristoteles De mundo und Theilers Posidonius’, Wiener Studien 100, 69–84.Google Scholar

Stroux, J. 1933. ‘Die stoische Beurteilung Alexanders des Grossen’, Philologus 88, 222–40.Google Scholar

Tannery, P. 1893. Recherches sur l’histoire de l’astronomie ancienne (Paris: Gauthier-Villars).Google Scholar

Tarn, W. W. 1938. The Greeks in Bactria and India (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Tarn, W. W. 1948. Alexander the Great, vol. 2: Sources and Studies (Cambridge–London–New York–Melbourne: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Taub, L. 2003. Ancient Meteorology (London–New York: Routledge).Google Scholar

Taylor, A. E. 1928. A Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Theiler, W. 1982. Poseidonios: Die Fragmente, 2 vols (Berlin–New York: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Thom, J. C. 2012. ‘Popular Philosophy in the Hellenistic-Roman World’, Early Christianity 3, 279–95.Google Scholar

Thom, J. C. 2014a. ‘The Cosmotheology of De mundo’, in Thom, J. C. (ed.), Cosmic Order and Divine Power: Pseudo-Aristotle, On the Cosmos (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 107–20.Google Scholar

Thom, J. C. 2015. ‘Paul and Popular Philosophy’, in Breytenbach, C (ed.), Paul’s Graeco-Roman Context (Leuven–Paris: Peeters), 47–74.Google Scholar

Thompson, D. W. 1918. ‘The Greek Winds’, Classical Review 32, 49–56.Google Scholar

Thomson, J. O. 1948. History of Ancient Geography (New York: Macmillan).Google Scholar

Torallas Tovar, S. and Worp, K. A. 2006. To the Origins of Greek Stenography (Barcelona: Abadia de Montserrat/Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas).Google Scholar

Tsabari, I. 1990. Διονυσίου Ἀλεξανδρέως Οἰκουμένης Περιήγησις (Ioannina: Kaktos).Google Scholar

Tzvetkova-Glaser, A. 2014. ‘The Concepts of οὐσία and δύναμις in De mundo and Their Parallels in Hellenistic-Jewish and Christian Texts’, in Thom, J. C. (ed.), Cosmic Order and Divine Power: Pseudo-Aristotle, On the Cosmos (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 133–52.Google Scholar

Van Nuffelen, P. 2011. Rethinking the Gods: Philosophical Readings of Religion in the Post-Hellenistic Period (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Vanotti, G. 2007. Aristotele: Racconti meravigliosi (Milan: Bompiani).Google Scholar

Wellmann, M. 1894. ‘Antiochos 21 (I Soter)’, Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, vol. 1.2, cols. 2450–5.Google Scholar

West, M. L. (ed.) 1966. Hesiod: Theogony (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

West, M. L. 1983. The Orphic Poems (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Whitby, M. 2011. ‘Onesikritos (134)’, in Worthington, I (ed.), Brill’s New Jacoby, Leiden. http://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/brill-s-new-jacoby/onesikritos-134-a134?s.num=4 (last accessed 3 March 2017).Google Scholar

White, A. C. 1903. A Translation of the Quaestio de aqua et terra (Boston: Ginn & Co.).Google Scholar

Wildberg, C. 2009. ‘Aporiai 9–10’, in Crubellier, M and Laks, A (ed.), Aristotle: Metaphysics Beta (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 168–72.Google Scholar

Wilson, M. 2009. ‘A Somewhat Disorderly Nature: Unity in Aristotle’s Meteorologica I–III’, Apeiron 42, 63–88.Google Scholar

Wilson, M. 2013. Structure and Method in Aristotle’s Meteorologica: A More Disorderly Nature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Wilson, P. 2000. The Athenian Institution of the Khoregia: The Chorus, the City and the Stage (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Wolfsdorf, D. 2006. ‘Hippias Major 301b2–c2: Plato’s Critique of a Corporeal Conception of Forms and of the Form–Participant Relation’, Apeiron 39, 221–56.Google Scholar

Wood, J. G. 1894. Theophrastus of Eresus on Winds and Other Weather Signs (London: Edward Stanford).Google Scholar

Zeller, E. 1885. ‘Über den Ursprung der Schrift von der Welt’, Sitzungsberichte der Königlich-preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Philos.-hist. Classe 23, 399–415.Google Scholar

Zeller, E. 1923. Die Philosophie der Griechen, vol. 3, part 1 (Leipzig: Reisland).Google Scholar

Zonn, I. S., Kostianoy, A. G., Kosarev, A. N. and Glantz, M. H. (eds.) 2010. The Caspian Sea Encyclopedia (Springer:Heidelberg–Dordrecht–London).Google Scholar