Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-mm7gn Total loading time: 0.45 Render date: 2022-08-17T10:50:55.688Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Five - “And Make Some Other Man Our King”

Labile Elite Power Structures in Early Iron Age Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2021

T. L. Thurston
Affiliation:
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Manuel Fernández-Götz
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

This excerpt is from the Declaration of Arbroath, which was sent in 1320 with the signatures of 38 Scots noblemen to Pope John XXII in Avignon. The document is an expression of support for Robert I, also known as The Bruce, the leader of one of several competing polities in Scotland in the 14th century. Its other purpose was to petition the pope to persuade the English, led at the time by Edward I, also known as Malleus Scotorum, or “The Hammer of the Scots,” to cease hostilities against Scotland. (To be fair, he hammered the Welsh and diverse infidels in the Holy Land during the Ninth Crusade as well; hammering seems to have been his thing.) The term the Scots nobles used in the Declaration to describe their polity was nacio, usually translated as “the people,” which of course did not mean what it does today – women, children and landless males too old or poor to count were implicitly included but had no actual power over their own persons.

Type
Chapter
Information
Power from Below in Premodern Societies
The Dynamics of Political Complexity in the Archaeological Record
, pp. 106 - 124
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armit, I. (2015) Within these walls: Household and society in Iron Age Scotland and Ireland. In Hunter, F. & Ralston, I. (eds.) Scotland in Later Prehistoric Europe, 185199. Edinburgh, Society of Antiquaries of Scotland.Google Scholar
Arnold, B. (1991) The Material Culture of Social Structure: Rank and Status in Early Iron Age Europe. PhD thesis, Cambridge, ma, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Arnold, B. (1999) “Drinking the Feast”: Alcohol and the Legitimation of Power in Celtic Europe. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 9 (1), 7193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, B. (2004) Machtbeziehungen und Geschlechterdifferenz in der vorgeschichtlichen Eisenzeit Europas. In Heininger, B., Böhm, S., & Sals, U. (eds.) Machtbeziehungen, Geschlechterdifferenz und Religion, 934. Münster, LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Arnold, B. (2010) Eventful archaeology, the Heuneburg mud-brick wall and the Early Iron Age of southwest Germany. In Bolender, D. (ed.) Eventful Archaeologies, 100114. Buffalo, State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, B. (2012) Gender and temporality in Iron Age west-central Europe. In M. J. Maynes & M. Ryan (eds.) Temporalities and Periodization in Human History: Conversations across the Disciplines of History and Archaeology Special Section Social Science History 36 (1), 85112.Google Scholar
Arnold, B. (2016) Belts vs. blades: the binary bind in Iron Age southwest German mortuary contexts. In L. Ghisleni, A. Jordan, & E. Fioccoprile (eds.) “Binary Bind”: Deconstructing Sex and Gender Dichotomies in Archaeological Practice, Special Issue of the Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 23 (3), 832853.Google Scholar
Arnold, B. & Fernández-Götz, M. (2017) The grave’s a not-so-private place: Elite multiple burials in early Iron Age west-central Europe. Germania 95, 181198.Google Scholar
Arnold, B. & Gibson, D. B. (eds.) (1995) Celtic Chiefdom, Celtic State. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, B. & Hagmann, S. (2014) Pins and rings as head ornaments in early Iron Age southwest Germany. Encyclopedia of Dress and Fashion. New York, Berg. www.bergfashionlibrary.com/view/bewdf/BEWDF-v8/EDch8917.xmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, B., Murray, M. L., & Schneider, S. A. (2001) Abschließende Untersuchungen in einem hallstattzeitlichen Grabhügel der Hohmichele-Gruppe im “Speckhau,” Markung Heiligkreuztal, Gemeinde Altheim, Landkreis Biberach. Archäologische Ausgrabungen in Baden-Württemberg 2000, 6770.Google Scholar
Arnold, B., Murray, M. L., & Schneider, S. A. (2003) Untersuchungen an einem zweiten hallstattzeitlichen Grabhügel der Hohmichele-Gruppe im “Speckhau,” Markung Heiligkreuztal, Gemeinde Altheim, Landkreis Biberach. Archäologische Ausgrabungen in Baden-Württemberg 2002, 7881.Google Scholar
Biel, J. (1985) Die Ausstattung des Toten: Reichtum im Grabe – Spiegel seiner Macht. In Biel, J. (ed.) Der Keltenfürst von Hochdorf: Methoden und Ergebnisse der Landesarchäologie, 78105. Stuttgart, Konrad Theiss Verlag.Google Scholar
Blanton, R. E. & Fargher, L. (2008) Collective Action in the Formation of Pre-Modern States. New York, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanton, R. E., Feinman, G. M., Kowalewski, S. A., & Peregrine, P. N. (1996) A dual-processual theory for the evolution of Mesoamerican civilization. Current Anthropology 37 (1), 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogaard, A., Styring, A., Whitlam, J., Fochesato, M., & Bowles, S. (2018) Farming, inequality and urbanization: A comparative analysis of late prehistoric northern Mesopotamia and southwestern Germany. In Kohler, T. A. & Smith, M. E. (eds.) Ten Thousand Years of Inequality, 201229. Tucson, University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. (1998) The Passage of Arms: An Archaeological Analysis of Prehistoric Hoards and Votive Deposits. Oxford, Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Brück, J. & Fontijn, D. (2013) The myth of the chief: prestige goods, power, and personhood in the European Bronze Age. In Fokkens, H. & Harding, A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of the European Bronze Age, 197215. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caesar, [1982 Gardner, Jane ed.] De Bello Gallico/The Conquest of Gaul. Harmondsworth/New York, Penguin.Google Scholar
Clifford-Vaughan, F. (1974) Disintegration of a tribal society: The decline of the clans in Highland Scotland. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 43, 7381.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. (1981) The Politics of Elite Culture: Explorations in the Dramaturgy of Power in a Modern African Society. Berkeley, University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crumley, C. (1995) Heterarchy and the analysis of complex societies. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 6 (1), 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curet, L. A. (1991) House structure and cultural change in the Caribbean: Three case studies from Puerto Rico. Latin American Antiquity 3 (2), 160174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Götz, M., Wendling, H., & Winger, K. (eds.) (2014) Introduction: new perspectives on Iron Age urbanization. In Paths to Complexity: Centralisation and Urbanisation in Iron Age Europe, 214. Oxford, Oxbow Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garstki, K., Arnold, B., & Murray, M. L. (2015) Reconstituting community: 3D visualization and early Iron Age social organization in the Heuneburg mortuary landscape. Journal of Archaeological Science 54, 2330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gersbach, E. (1995) Baubefunde der Perioden Ivc-Iva der Heuneburg. Heuneburgstudien ix. Mainz, Philipp von Zabern Verlag.Google Scholar
Gleeson, P. (2017) Gathering the nations: Towards an archaeology of assembly in early medieval Ireland. In Beglane, F. (ed.) Gatherings: Past and Present, 7285. Oxford, Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78, 1360–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, F. R. (2002) Fürstensitz, Fürstengräber und Heiligtum. In Baitinger, H. & Pinsker, B. (eds.) Das Rätsel der Kelten vom Glauberg: Glaube, Mythos, Wirklichkeit, 90107. Stuttgart, Konrad Theiss Verlag.Google Scholar
Hill, J. D. (2006) Are we any closer to understanding how Iron Age societies worked (or did not work)? In Haselgrove, C. (ed.) Les mutations de la fin de l’âge du Fer, 169179. Bibracte, Glux-en-Glenne.Google Scholar
Huth, C. (2017) Frög – Sopron – Nové Košariská. Überlegungen zum Quellenwert früheisenzeitlicher Grabbeigaben. In Miroššayová, E., Pare, C., & Stegmann-Rajtár, S. (eds.) Das nördliche Karpatenbecken in der Hallstattzeit. Wirtschaft, Handel und Kommunikation in früheisenzeitlichen Gesellschaften zwischen Ostalpen und Westpannonien, 173190. Budapest, Archaeolingua.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. A. J. (2017) Why Did Ancient Civilizations Fail? London/New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Kienlin, T. L. (2017) World systems and the structuring potential of foreign-derived (prestige) goods. In Scholz, A. K., Bartelheim, M., Hardenberg, R., & Staecker, J. (eds.) ResourceCultures: Sociocultural Dynamics and the Use of Resources – Theories, Methods, Perspectives 5, 143158. Tübingen, Tübingen University.Google Scholar
Kohler, T. A., Smith, M. E., Bogaard, A., et al. (2018) Deep inequality: summary and conclusions. In Kohler, T. A. & Smith, M. E. (eds.) Ten Thousand Years of Inequality, 289317. Tucson, University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Krausse, D. (1999) Der “Keltenfürst” von Hochdorf: Dorfältester oder Sakralkönig? Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 29, 339358.Google Scholar
Krausse, D. & Ebinger-Rist, N. (2016) The princess’ grave from Bettelbühl. In Krausse, D., Fernández-Götz, M., & Hansen, L. (eds.) The Heuneburg and the Early Iron Age Princely Seats: First Towns North of the Alps, 132134. Budapest, Archaeolingua.Google Scholar
Krausse, D., Fernández-Götz, M., Gutekunst, A., & Hansen, L. (2019) Size matters – A reevaluation of the Heuneburg demography. Germania 97, 179189.Google Scholar
Krausse, D., Kretschmer, I., Hansen, L., & Fernández-Götz, M. (eds.) (2015) Die Heuneburg: keltischer Fürstensitz an der oberen Donau. Darmstadt, Theiss.Google Scholar
Kurz, S. (2007) Untersuchungen zur Entstehung der Heuneburg in der späten Hallstattzeit. Forschungen und Berichte zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte in Baden-Württemberg 105. Stuttgart, Konrad Theiss Verlag.Google Scholar
Kurz, S. (2008) Neue Forschungen im Umfeld der Heuneburg: Zwischenbericht zum Stand des Projektes “Zentralort und Umland: Untersuchungen zur Struktur der Heuneburg-Außensiedlung und zum Verhältnis der Heuneburg zu umgebenden Höhensiedlungen.” In Krausse, D. (ed.) Frühe Zentralisierungs- und Urbanisierungsprozesse: Zur Genese und Entwicklung frühkeltischer Fürstensitze und ihres territorialen Umlandes, 163184. Stuttgart, Konrad Theiss Verlag.Google Scholar
Kurz, S. (2010) Zur Genese und Entwicklung der Heuneburg in der Späthallstattzeit. In Krausse, D. & Beilharz, D. (eds.), Fürstensitze und Zentralorte der frühen Kelten, 239256. Stuttgart, Konrad Theiss Verlag.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. H. (1962) The Myth of the Ruling Class. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Olivier, L. (1999) The Hochdorf “princely” grave and the question of the nature of archaeological funerary assemblages. In Murray, T. (ed.) Time and Archaeology, 109138. London/New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Parkinson, W. A. (2002) Integration, interaction, and tribal “cycling”: The transition to the Copper Age on the Great Hungarian Plain. In Parkinson, W. A. (ed.) The Archaeology of Tribal Societies, 391438. Ann Arbor, International Monographs in Prehistory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, N. (1994) Cattlelords and Clansmen: The Social Structure of Early Ireland. Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragan, E. (2017) The ghosts of kings: socio-political complexity and ethnogenesis at the edge of Europe. In Crabtree, P. J. & Bogucki, P. (eds.) European Archaeology as Anthropology: Essays in Honor of Bernard Wailes, 137160. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. (1974) Beyond a subsistence economy: The evolution of social organization in prehistoric Europe. In C. B. Moore (ed.) Reconstructing Complex Societies, 69–96. Supplement to the Bulletin of the American School of Oriental Research 20.Google Scholar
Riek, G. & Hundt, H. J. (1962) Der Hohmichele: Ein Fürstengrabhügel der späten Hallstattzeit bei der Heuneburg. Berlin, Heuneburgstudien I. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. L. (2000) Clan, King and Covenant: History of the Highland Clans from the Civil War to the Glencoe Massacre. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Rösch, M. (n.d.) Pflanzenreste aus Tumulus 17 Grab 1. In Arnold, B., Murray, M. L., & Kreß, T. (eds.) A Landscape of Ancestors: Archaeological Investigations of Two Iron Age Burial Mounds in the Hohmichele Group, Baden-Württemberg. Forschungen und Berichte zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte in Baden-Württemberg.Google Scholar
Schama, S. (2000) A History of Britain: At the Edge of the World 3500 bc – 1603 ad. New York, Hyperion.Google Scholar
Schumann, R. (2015) Status und Prestige in der Hallstattkultur. Rahden/Westf, Verlag Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
Shore, C. (2002) Introduction: Toward an anthropology of elites. In Shore, C. & Nugent, S. (eds.) Elite Cultures: Anthropological Perspectives, 121. ASA Monographs 38. London/New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Terrell, J. E. (2015) A Talent for Friendship: Rediscovery of a Remarkable Trait. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Verger, S. (2008) Enterré dans souvenir de la maison a propos du Tumulus 4 de la Heuneburg dans la haute vallée du Danube. In Bartoloni, G. & Benedettini, M. G. (eds.) Sepolti tra i Vivi/Buried among the Living. Evidenza ed Interpretazione di Contesti funerario in Abitato. Scienze dell’ Antichità. Storia Archeologia Antropologia 14 (2), 919958. Rome, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sepienza.Google Scholar
Wade, L. (2017) Unearthing democracy’s roots. Science 355 (6330), 11141118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallis, R. J. (2003) Shamans/neo-Shamans: Ecstacy, Alternative Archaeologies and Contemporary Pagans. London/New York, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witgen, M. (2012) An Infinity of Nations: How the Native New World Shaped Early North America. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×