Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T14:49:43.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

2 - Protecting Human Rights

Louise Chappell
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
John Chesterman
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Lisa Hill
Affiliation:
University of Adelaide
Get access

Summary

Without a bill of rights, Australians are required to look to other institutions for their human rights protection. The Constitution, parliament and the courts each play a role in this process. The Constitution includes some limited rights provisions, the legislature has passed laws to protect rights in certain areas and the courts have upheld some rights under the common law. However, the idea advanced at the time of federation that these institutions would combine to provide an adequate safeguard against the infringement of human rights by government is now seriously under question. The limitations that exist within and among these institutional arenas mean that they provide, at best, a patchy net of protection through which many minorities slip. Australia's existing human rights framework has not come to terms with important developments of the past 50 years: changing community expectations about the importance of human rights, the dominance of the executive over parliament and the rise of larger and more powerful government. Attempts by each institution, especially the High Court, to interpret the Constitution and the common law to reflect these changes, has led to controversy and conflict between the different branches of Australian government. The effort to bring the international human rights regime to bear in national human rights debates has further complicated the scene and resulted in rights seekers becoming even more confused about where to look for protection.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Attorney-General, , 2008a. ‘Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Australia and International Human Rights: Coming in from the Cold’. Ministerial Speech. Accessed online at www.attorneygeneral.gov.au/www/ministers/robertmc.nsf/Page/Speeches_2008_HumanRightsandEqualOpportunityCommission, 6 June 2008.
Attorney-General, 2008b. ‘Rudd Government Proposes Ratification of UN Disabilities Convention’. Media release. Accessed online at www.attorneygeneral.gov.au/www/ministers/RobertMc.nsf/Page/MediaReleases_2008_SecondQuarter_4June2008-RuddGovernmentProposesRatificationofUN, 6 June 2008.
Attorney-General, 2007. Acting on Conscience: How can we responsibly mix law, religion and politics?St Lucia, Queensland University Press.Google Scholar
Attorney-General, 1998. Legislating Liberty: A bill of rights for Australia?St Lucia, Queensland University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, A. J., 2006. ‘The Constitution We Were Meant to Have: Re-examining the origins and strength of Australia's unitary political traditions.’ Paper in Democratic Experiments: Lectures in the Senate Occasional Lecture Series 2004–2005'. Papers on Parliament, 44, January 2006: 41–65.Google Scholar
Callinan, I., 2005. ‘International Law and Australian Sovereignty.’ Quadrant. July–August: 9–17.Google Scholar
Campbell, T., 2001. ‘Democratising Human Rights.’ In Human Rights in Philosophy and Practice, eds Burton, M. Leisnet and Campbell, Tom D.. Dartmouth: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, H., 2002. Writing in Rights: Australia and the Protection of Human Rights. Sydney: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, H. 2006. Human Rights: Australia versus the UN, Democratic Audit of Australia, Discussion Paper 22/06.
Charlesworth, H.Chiam, Madeleine, Hovell, Devika and Williams, George. 2006. No Country is an Island: Australian and international law. Sydney: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
Chesterman, John and Galligan, Brian, 1997. Citizens Without Rights: Aborigines and Australian Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiam, Madelaine, 2004. ‘Evaluating Australia's Treaty Making Process.’ Public Law Review, 15: 265–9.Google Scholar
Doyle, John and Wells, Belinda, 1999. ‘How Far Can the Common Law Go Towards Protecting Human Rights?’ In Promoting Human Rights Through Bills of Rights: Comparative Perspectives, ed. Alston, Phillip. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Simon and Evans, Carolyn, 2007. ‘Australian Parliaments and the Protection of Human Rights’. Papers on Parliament 47, July. Canberra: Department of the Senate.Google Scholar
Evatt, Elizabeth, 2001. ‘Australia's Performance in Human Rights’. Alternative Law Journal, 26(1): 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galligan, Brian, 1995. ‘Parliamentary Responsible Government and the Protection of Rights.’ In The Australian Political System, eds Lovell, David W., McAllister, Ian, Mayley, William and Kukathas, Chandran. Melbourne: Longman.Google Scholar
Gelber, Katharine, 2005. ‘High Court Review 2004: Limits on the Judicial Protection of Rights.’ Australian Journal of Political Science, 40(2): 307–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goot, Murray and Rowse, Tim, 2007. Divided Nation? Indigenous Affairs and the Imagined Public. Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing.Google Scholar
Haller, Rochelle L., 2001. ‘Australia's Cold-Shoulder: Setting a Dangerous Precedent for Human Rights Violators.’ New York Law School Journal of Human Rights, 17: 937–41.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Clive and Maddison, Sarah, 2007. ‘Dissent in Australia’ In Silencing Dissent: How the Australian Government is Controlling Public Opinion and Stifling Debate, eds Hamilton, Clive and Maddison, Sarah. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Hill, Lisa, 2002. ‘On the Reasonableness of Compelling Citizens to Vote: The Australian Case.’ Political Studies, 50(1): 80–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Lisa 2004. ‘Compulsory Voting in Australia: A Basis for a “Best Practice” Regime’, Federal Law Review, 32(3): 479–97.Google Scholar
Hill, Lisa and Jonathon, Louth, 2005. ‘Compulsory Voting in Australia: Turnout With and Without It.’ Australian Review of Public Affairs, 6(1): 25–37.Google Scholar
Horrigan, Bryan, 2006. ‘Improving Legislative Scrutiny of Proposed Laws to Enhance basic Rights, Parliamentary Democracy, and the Quality of Law Making.’ In Protecting Rights Without a Bill of Rights, eds Campbell, Tom, Goldsworthy, Jeffrey and Stone, Adrienne. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Hovell, Devika, 2003. ‘The Sovereignty Stratagem: Australia's response to UN human rights treaty bodies.’ Alternative Law Review, 28(6): 297–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC), 2007. Social Justice Report. Accessed online at www.hreoc.gov.au/social_justice/sj_report/sjreport07/index.html, 26 August 2008.
,Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC) 2008. Reports to the Minister under the HREOCA. Accessed online at www.hreoc.gov.au/legal/HREOCA_reports/index.html, 15 May 2008.
Kildea, Paul and Gelber, Katharine, 2007. ‘High Court Review 2006: Australian Federalism-Implications of the WorkChoices Decision.’ Australian Journal of Political Science, 42(4): 649–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinley, David, 1998. Human Rights in Australian Law: Principles, practice and potential. Sydney: Federation Press.Google Scholar
Kirby, Michael, 1999. ‘Domestic Implementation of Human Rights Norms.’ Australian Journal of Human Rights, 27: 1–13.Google Scholar
Lacey, Wendy, 2001. ‘In the Wake of Teoh: Finding an Appropriate Government Response.’ Federal Law Review, 29(3): 219–40.Google Scholar
Lynch, Andrew, 2006. ‘Legislating with Urgency – The Enactment of the Anti-Terrorism Act [No. 1] 2005’. Melbourne University Law Review, 31: 747–81.Google Scholar
Maddox, Graham, 1996. Australian Democracy in Theory and Practice. 3rd edn. Melbourne: Longman.Google Scholar
Malbon, Justin, 2002. ‘Avoiding the Hindmarsh Island Bridge Disaster: Interpreting the race power.’ Flinders Journal of Law Reform, 6(1): 44–60.Google Scholar
Mason, Anthony, The Honourable Justice, 1998. ‘The Role of the Judiciary in Developing Human Rights Law in Australia.’ In Human Rights In Australian Law, ed. Kinley, David. Sydney: Federation Press.Google Scholar
Meagher, Roderick, The Honourable Justice, 1999. ‘Civil Rights and Other Impediments to Democracy.’ Eleventh Conference of the Samuel Griffith Society. Melbourne, 9–11 July.
,New South Wales Council for Civil Liberties, 2008. Does Australia violate Human Rights?. Accessed online at www.nswccl.org.au/issues/hr_violations.php, 2 June 2008.
Omar, Imtiaz, 1995. ‘Darkness On The Edge Of Town: The High Court and Human Rights in the Brandy Case.’ Australian Journal of Human Rights, 8: 115–26.Google Scholar
O'Neil, Nick, Rice, Simon and Douglas, Roger, 2004. Retreat from Injustice: Human Rights Law in Australia. 2nd edn. Sydney: Federation Press.Google Scholar
Orr, Graeme, Mercurio, Bryan and Williams, George, 2002. ‘Australian Electoral Law: A Stocktake.’ Election Law Journal, 2(3): 383–402.Google Scholar
Otto, Diane, 2001. ‘From reluctance to exceptionalism: The Australian Approach to Domestic Implementation of Human Rights.’ Alternative Law Review, 26(5): 219–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patapan, Haig, 2000. Judging Democracy: The New Politics of the High Court of Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Patapan, Haig 2003. ‘High Court Review 2002: The Least Dangerous Branch.’ Australian Journal of Political Science, 38(2): 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Public Interest Advocacy Centre, 2008. ‘Landmark Cases.’ Accessed online at www.piac.asn.au/litigation/landmark.html, 20 October.
Saunders, Cheryl, 2002. ‘Protecting Rights in Common Law Constitutional Systems: A framework for a comparative study.’ Victoria University Wellington Law Review, 33: 83–112.Google Scholar
Sidoti, Chris and Wilke, Meredith, 2000. ‘Human Rights in Australia: The Role and Perspective of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission.’ In The Politics of Australian Society: Political Issues for the New Century, eds Boreham, Paul, Geoffrey, PaulRichard Hall, Stokes. Melbourne: Longman.Google Scholar
Smith, Stephen, The Honourable and McClelland, Robert, The Honourable, 2008. ‘Re-engagement with United Nations on Torture.’ Media release. Office of the Attorney-General for Australia. Accessed online at www.attorneygeneral.gov.au/www/ministers/robertmc.nsf/Page/RWPCA237434E060DDDACA25744C00231F0A, 6 June 2008.
Solomon, David, 1999. The Political High Court: How the High Court Shapes Politics. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Solomon, David 1995. ‘What's Wrong With the High Court Playing a Significant Political Role.’ In The Australian Political System, eds Lovell, David W., McAllister, Ian, Mayley, William and Kukathas, Chandran. Melbourne: Longman.Google Scholar
‘Status of Ratifications of the Principal International Human Rights Treaties,’ 2004. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Accessed online at www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/a_ccpr.htm, 18 June 2008.
Tucker, D. F. B., 1997. ‘Natural Law or Common Law?: Human Rights in Australia.’ In Rethinking Human Rights, eds Galligan, Brian and Sampford, Charles. Sydney: Federation Press.Google Scholar
Uhr, John, 2006. ‘The Performance of Australian Legislatures in Protecting Rights.’ In Protecting Rights Without a Bill of Rights, eds Campbell, Tom, Goldsworthy, Jeffrey and Stone, Adrienne. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Williams, George, 2002. Human Rights Under the Australian Constitution. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Winterton, George, 2006. ‘An Australian Rights Council.’ In Protecting Rights Without a Bill of Rights, eds Campbell, Tom, Goldsworthy, Jeffrey and Stone, Adrienne. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Al-Kateb v Godwin [2004] HCA 37.
Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (1992) 177 CLR 106.
Dietrich v R (1992) 177 CLR 292.
Kruger v Commonwealth (1997) 190 CLR 1.
Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520.
Levy v Victoria (1997) 189 CLR 579.
Mabo v Queensland (No. 2) [1992] HCA 23.
McGinty v Western Australia (1996) 186 CLR 140.
Minister for Immigration v Teoh [1995] HCA 20.
Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Wills (1992) 177 CLR 1.
Re Woolleys [2004] HCA 49.
Wik Peoples v Queensland [1996] HCA 40.
Al-Kateb v Godwin [2004] HCA 37.
Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (1992) 177 CLR 106.
Dietrich v R (1992) 177 CLR 292.
Kruger v Commonwealth (1997) 190 CLR 1.
Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520.
Levy v Victoria (1997) 189 CLR 579.
Mabo v Queensland (No. 2) [1992] HCA 23.
McGinty v Western Australia (1996) 186 CLR 140.
Minister for Immigration v Teoh [1995] HCA 20.
Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Wills (1992) 177 CLR 1.
Re Woolleys [2004] HCA 49.
Wik Peoples v Queensland [1996] HCA 40.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×