Book contents
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I The Italian Renaissance
- Part II Sixteenth-Century France
- Chapter 3 Jacques Lefèvre d’Étaples and Charles de Bovelles on Platonism, Theurgy, and Intellectual Difficulty
- Chapter 4 Symphorien Champier on Medicine, Theology, and Politics
- Part III The “Cambridge Platonists”
- Part IV German Romanticism
- Part V The Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries
- Appendix: Chronology of Editions and Translations of Plotinus1
- Index
- References
Chapter 4 - Symphorien Champier on Medicine, Theology, and Politics
from Part II - Sixteenth-Century France
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I The Italian Renaissance
- Part II Sixteenth-Century France
- Chapter 3 Jacques Lefèvre d’Étaples and Charles de Bovelles on Platonism, Theurgy, and Intellectual Difficulty
- Chapter 4 Symphorien Champier on Medicine, Theology, and Politics
- Part III The “Cambridge Platonists”
- Part IV German Romanticism
- Part V The Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries
- Appendix: Chronology of Editions and Translations of Plotinus1
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Plotinus' LegacyThe Transformation of Platonism from the Renaissance to the Modern Era, pp. 96 - 124Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Allen, M. J. B. (1992) “Summoning Plotinus: Ficino, Smoke and the Strangled Chickens”, in Di Cesare, M. A. (ed.) Reconsidering the Renaissance, Binghamton, NY, 63–88 [repr. in Allen, Plato’s Third Eye].Google Scholar
Allen, M. J. B. (1995) Plato’s Third Eye: Studies in Marsilio Ficino’s Metaphysics and Its Sources, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Allen, M. J. B. (1998) Synoptic Art: Marsilio Ficino on the History of Platonic Interpretation, Florence.Google Scholar
Allen, M. J. B. and Hankins, J. (ed. and trans.) (2001–2006) Marsilio Ficino, Platonic Theology, 6 vols., Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Allut, P. (1859) Études biographique et bibliographique sur Symphorien Champier, Lyon.Google Scholar
Antonioli, R. (1974) “Un médecin lecteur du Timée, Symphorien Champier,” in L’Humanisme au XVIe siècle, Grenoble, 53–62.Google Scholar
Catana, L. (2014) “Readings of Platonic Virtue Theories from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance: The Case of Marsilio Ficino’s De Amore,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 22: 680–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavallo, S. and Storey, T. (2013) Healthy Living in Late Renaissance Italy, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celenza, C. S. (2002) “Late Antiquity and Florentine Platonism: The ‘Post-Plotinian’ Ficino,” in Allen, M. J. B., Rees, V., and Davies, M. (eds.) Marsilio Ficino: His Theology, His Philosophy, His Legacy, Leiden, 71–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champier, S. (1506) De corporum animorumque morbis eorundemque remediis opusculum in duos tractatus sive libellos partitum, Lyon.Google Scholar
Champier, S. (1508) De triplici disciplina, cuius partes sunt philosophia naturalis, medicina, theologia, moralis philosophia integrantes quadrivium, Lyon.Google Scholar
Champier, S. (1516) Symphonia Platonis cum Aristotele et Galeni cum Hippocrate, Paris.Google Scholar
Champier, S. (1517) Practica nova in medicina de omnibus morborum generibus ex traditionibus Graecorum, Latinorum, Arabum, Poenorum ac recentium autorum aurei libri quinque, Lyon.Google Scholar
Champier, S. (1528?) Symphonia Galeni ad Hippocratem, Cornelii Celsi ad Avicennam, Lyon?Google Scholar
Champier, S. (1533) Periarchon, id est de principiis utriusque philosophiae […] quae Galenus in demonstrativis sermonibus, et Aristoteles in libris naturalium disciplinarum, ac Timaeus Locrus et Plato in libris de universo scripserunt […], Lyon.Google Scholar
Chin, C. “Cento,” in Grafton, A., Most, G. W., and Settis, S. (eds.) (2010) The Classical Tradition, Cambridge, MA, 189–190.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. (1988) “Humanistes et antiquaires à Lyon,” in Possenti, A. and Mastrangelo, G. (eds.) Il Rinascimento a Lione, Rome,159–174.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. (1998) “Les dernières années de Symphorien Champier,” Bulletin de l’Association d’Étude sur l’Humanisme, la Réforme et la Renaissance, 47: 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copenhaver, B. P. (1977) “Lefevre d’Etaples, Symphorien Champier, and the Secret Names of God,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 40:189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copenhaver, B. P. (1978) Symphorien Champier and the Reception of the Occultist Tradition in Renaissance France, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copenhaver, B. P. (1986) “Renaissance Magic and Neoplatonic Philosophy: Ennead 4. 3–5 in Ficino’s De vita coelitus comparanda,” in Garfagnini, G. C. (ed.) Marsilio Ficino e il ritorno di Platone: Studi e documenti, Florence, II, 351–369.Google Scholar
Corrias, A. (2013) “From Daemonic Reason to Daemonic Imagination: Plotinus and Marsilio Ficino on the Soul’s Tutelary Spirit,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21: 443–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, J. M. (1996) “An Ethic for the Late Antique Sage,” in Gerson, L. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, Cambridge, UK, 315–335,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
du Cange, C. (1883–1887) Glossarium mediae et infimae latinitatis, ed. Favre, L., 8 vols., Niort.Google Scholar
Eliasson, E. (2015) “The Late Ancient Development of a Notion of Heroic Virtue,” in Rota, S. F. and Hellerstedt, A. (eds.) Shaping the Heroic Virtue: Studies in the Art and Politics of Supereminence in Europe and Scandinavia, Leiden:19–40.Google Scholar
Ficino, M. (1576) Marsilii Ficini Florentini […] opera et quae hactenus extitere et quae in lucem nunc primum prodiere omnia […], Basel. (Photographic reprint Turin 1959, and later Lucca 2011).Google Scholar
Garin, E. (1974) “Plotino nel Rinascimento,” in Plotino e il Neoplatonismo in Oriente e in Occidente, Rome, 537–553 [repr. in Garin, Rinascite e rivoluzioni].Google Scholar
Garin, E. (1975) Rinascite e rivoluzioni: Movimenti culturali dal XIV al XVIII secolo, Bari.Google Scholar
Gersh, S. (2017) “Analytical Study of the Commentary on Ennead III,” in Gersh, S. (ed.) Marsilio Ficino, Commentary on Plotinus, Cambridge, MA, xi–ccxxxi.Google Scholar
Hankins, J. (2016) “Iamblichus, Ficino and Schleiermacher on the Sources of Religious Knowledge,” Erudition and the Republic of Letters, 1: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunkeler, T. (2007) “Symphorien Champier: Logique(s) du compilateur,” in Carlino, A. and Wenger, A. (eds.) Littérature et médicine: Approches et perspectives (XVIe-XIXe siècles), Geneva, 49–63.Google Scholar
Jodogne, P. (1972) “La correspondance de Symphorien Champier avec Jérôme de Pavie dans le ‘Duellum epistolare’ 1519,” in Verbeke, G. and Ijsewijn, J. (eds.) The Late Middle Ages and the Dawn of Humanism Outside of Italy, Leuven and The Hague, 45–56.Google Scholar
Karamanolis, G. (2013) “Numenius”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/numenius/ (accessed 16 November 2018).Google Scholar
Kaske, C. V. and Clark, J. R. (eds.) (1989) Marsilio Ficino, Three Books on Life, Binghamton, NY.Google Scholar
Kessler, E. (2011) Alexander of Aphrodisias and His Doctrine of the Soul: 1400 Years of Lasting Significance, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langseth, J. L. (2013) Knowing God: A Study of the Argument of Numenius of Apameia’s On the Good. Dissertation. University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Martin, J. (1973) “Le rôle de l’imprimerie lyonnaise dans le premier humanisme français,” in L’Humanisme français au début de la Renaissance: Colloque international de Tours, Paris, 81–91.Google Scholar
Muccillo, M. (1996) Platonismo, ermetismo e ‘prisca theologia’: Ricerche di storiografia filosofica rinascimentale, Florence.Google Scholar
Renaudet, A. (1916) Préréforme et humanisme à Paris pendant les premières guerres d’Italie (1494–1511), Paris.Google Scholar
Robichaud, D. J.-J. (2016) “Platonic Questions: Ficino’s Latin and Schleiermacher’s German,” Historia Philosophica: An International Journal, 14: 159–174.Google Scholar
Robichaud, D. J.-J. (2018) Plato’s Persona: Marsilio Ficino, Renaissance Humanism, and Platonic Traditions, Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roger, J. (1973) “L’humanisme médical de Symphorien Champier,” in L’Humanisme français au début de la Renaissance: Colloque de Tours, Paris, 261–272.Google Scholar
Saffrey, H.-D. (1996) “Florence 1492: The Reappearance of Plotinus,” Renaissance Quarterly, 49: 488–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saulnier, V. I. (1958) “Lyon et la médicine aux temps de la Renaissance,” La Revue Lyonnaise de Médicine 7: 73–83.Google Scholar
Schniewind, A. (2003) L’Éthique du sage chez Plotin: Le paradigme du spoudaios, Paris.Google Scholar
Silver, I. (1993) “Plato and Ficino in the Work of Symphorien Champier,” Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance, 55: 271–280.Google Scholar
Siraisi, N. G. (2007) History, Medicine, and the Traditions of Renaissance Learning, Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasoli, C. (1960) “Temi e fonti della tradizione ermetica in uno scritto di Symphorien Champier,” in Castelli, E. (ed.) Umanesimo e esoterismo, Padua, 235–247.Google Scholar
Wadsworth, J. B. (1962) Lyons 1473–1503: The Beginnings of Cosmopolitanism, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Walker, D. P. (1954) “The Prisca Theologia in France,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 17: 204–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar