aa.vv. (1973). Zetesis: Album amicorum door vrienden en collega’s aangeboden aan Prof. Dr. E. de Strycker ter gelegenheid van zijn 65e verjaardag. Antwerp and Utrecht: De Nederlandsche Boekhandel.Google Scholar

aa.vv. (eds.) (1995). ‘Commentarium in Platonis “Alcibiadem”’, Corpus dei Papiri Filosofici Greci e Latini iii. Florence: Olschki, 52–62.Google Scholar

Aalders, G. J. D. (1982). Plutarch’s Political Thought. Amsterdam, Oxford and New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Abbate, M. (2002). ‘Non-dicibilità del “Primo Dio” e via remotionis nel cap. x del Didaskalikos’ in Calabi, 2002a: 53–75.Google Scholar

Adamson, P. (2012). ‘Galen and al-Rāzī on Time’ in Hansberger, R., al-Akiti, M. A. and Burnett, C. (eds.), Medieval Arabic Thought: Essays in Honour of Fritz Zimmermann. London: Warburg Institute; Turin: Nino Aragno Editore, 1–14.Google Scholar

Addey, C. (2014). ‘The Daimonion of Socrates: Daimones and Divination in Neoplatonism’ in Layne, D. A. and Tarrant, H. (eds.), The Neoplatonic Socrates. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 51–72.Google Scholar

Alfageme, I. R. (2005). ‘Aspectos de la medicina hellenística en Plutarco’ in Casanova, 2005: 435–65.Google Scholar

Algra, K. A. (2014). ‘Plutarch and the Stoic Theory of Providence’ in d’Hoine, and Van Riel, 2014: 117–46.Google Scholar

Algra, K. A., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.) (1999). The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Algra, K. A., Van der Horst, P. W. and Runia, D. T. (eds.) (1996). Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy. Presented to Jaap Mansfeld on His Sixtieth Birthday. Leiden, New York and Cologne: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alt, K. (1993). Weltflucht und Weltbejahung: Zur Frage des Dualismus bei Plutarch, Numenios, Plotin. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar

Anastassiou, A. and Irmer, D. (2006). Testimonien zum Corpus Hippocraticum. Vol. i: Nachleben der hippokratischen Schriften bis zum 3. Jahrhundert n. Chr. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

André, J.-M. (1987). ‘Les Écoles philosophiques aux premiers siècles de l’Empire’, ANRW ii. 36.1: 5–77.Google Scholar

Andresen, C. (1952–3). ‘Justin und der mittlere Platonismus’, Zeitschrift für Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 44: 157–95. (Reprinted in Zintzen 1981: 319–68.)Google Scholar

Andresen, C. (1984). ‘The Integration of Platonism in Early Christian Theology’, Studia Patristica 15 = Texte und Untersuchungen 128: 399–413.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (1999). Platonic Ethics, Old and New. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (2002). ‘Platonist Ethics and Plato’ in Canto-Sperber, M. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Le Style de la pensée: Recueil de textes en hommage à Jacques Brunschwig. Paris: Belles Lettres, 1–24.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (2013). ‘Plato’s Laws and Cicero’s De Legibus’ in Schofield, 2013: 206–24.Google Scholar

Armstrong, A. H. (1940). The Architecture of the Intelligible Universe in the Philosophy of Plotinus: An Analytical and Historical Study. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Armstrong, A. H. (1960). ‘The Background of the Doctrine “That the Intelligibles Are Not outside the Intellect”’ in Les Sources de Plotin = Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique 5. Geneva: Fondation Hardt, 391–413.Google Scholar

Armstrong, A. H. (ed.) (1967). The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, A. H. (1992). ‘Dualism: Platonic, Gnostic, Christian’ in Wallis, 1992a: 33–54.Google Scholar

Aronadio, F. (2008). ‘L’orientamento filosofico di Cicerone e la sua traduzione del Timeo’, Méthexis 21: 111–29.Google Scholar

Athanassiadi, P. (1999). ‘The Chaldaean Oracles: Theology and Theurgy’ in Athanassiadi, P. and Frede, M. (eds.), Pagan Monotheism in Late Antiquity. Oxford University Press, 149–83.Google Scholar

Athanassiadi, P. (2005). ‘Apamea and the Chaldaean Oracles: A Holy City and a Holy Book’ in Smith, A. (ed.), The Philosopher and Society in Late Antiquity: Essays in Honour of Peter Brown. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales, 117–43.Google Scholar

Athanassiadi, P. (2010). ‘Canonizing Platonism: The Fetters of Iamblichus’ in Thomassen, E. (ed.), Canon and Canonicity: The Formation and Use of Scripture. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 129–41.Google Scholar

Auffret, T. (2014). ‘Serenus d’Antinoë dans la tradition gréco-arabe des Coniques’, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 24: 181–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babut, D. (1960). Review of de Lacy, P. and Einarson, B. (ed. and trans.), Plutarch’s Moralia vii (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1959), L’Antiquité Classique 29: 193–5.Google Scholar

Babut, D. (1969a). Plutarque et le stoïcisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Babut, D. (1969b). Plutarque de la vertu éthique. Introduction, text, translation and commentary. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Babut, D. (1975). ‘Ἱστορία οἷον ὕλη φιλοσοφίας: histoire et réflexion morale dans l’oeuvre de Plutarque’, Revue des Études Grecques 88: 206–19.Google Scholar

Babut, D. (1984). ‘Le dialogue de Plutarque “Sur le démon de Socrate”: essai d’interprétation’, Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 1: 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babut, D. (2007). ‘L’unité de l’académie selon Plutarque: notes en marge d’un débat ancien et toujours actuel’ in Bonazzi, , Lévy, and Steel, 2007: 63–98.Google Scholar

Baldassarri, M. (1993). ‘Ein kleiner Traktat Plutarchs über stoische Logik’ in Döring, K. and Ebert, T. (eds.), Dialektiker und Stoiker: Zur Logik der Stoa und ihrer Vorlaüfer. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 33–45.Google Scholar

Baltes, M. (1976). Die Weltentstehung des platonischen Timaios nach den antiken Interpreten. Vol. i. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baltes, M. (1983). ‘Zur Philosophie des Platonikers Attikos’ in Blume, and Mann, 1983: 38–57. (Reprinted in Baltes 1999b: 81–111.)Google Scholar

Baltes, M. (1985a). ‘Ammonios Sakkas’, Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum: Sachwörterbuch zur Auseinandersetzung des Christentums mit der antiken Welt. Suppl. 3. Stuttgart: Hiersemann, 323–9. (Reprinted in Baltes 1999b: 113–20.)Google Scholar

Baltes, M. (1985b). Review of Deuse 1983, Göttingische Gelehrte Anzeigen 237: 197–213. (Reprinted in Baltes 1999b: 121–39.)Google Scholar

Baltes, M. (1993). ‘Was ist antiker Platonismus?’ in Livingstone, 1993: i. 223–47.Google Scholar

Baltes, M. (1994). ‘Idee (Ideenlehre)’, Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum 17: 213–46. (Reprinted in Baltes 1999b: 275–302.)Google Scholar

Baltes, M. (1996a). ‘Muß die “Landkarte des Mittelplatonismus” neu gezeichnet werden?’, Göttingische gelehrte Anzeigen 248: 91–111. (Reprinted in Baltes 1999b: 327–50.)Google Scholar

Baltes, M. (1996b). ‘Γέγονεν (Platon, Tim. 28B7). Ist die Welt real entstanden oder nicht?’ in Algra, , Van der Horst, and Runia, 1996: 76–96. (Reprinted in Baltes 1999b: 303–25.)Google Scholar

Baltes, M. (1997). ‘Is the Idea of the Good in Plato’s Republic Beyond Being?’ in Joyal, 1997: 3–23. (Reprinted in Baltes 1999b: 351–71.)Google Scholar

Baltes, M. (1999a). ‘Der Platonismus und die Weisheit der Barbaren’ in Cleary, 1999: 115–38. (Reprinted in Baltes 2005a: 1–26.)Google Scholar

Baltes, M. (1999b). ΔΙΑΝΟΗΜΑΤΑ: Kleine Schriften zu Platon und zum Platonismus, ed. Hüffmeier, A., Lakmann, M.-L., Vorwerk, M.. Stuttgart and Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Baltes, M. (2000). ‘La dottrina dell’anima in Plutarco’, Elenchos 21: 245–70. (Trans. as ‘Plutarchs Lehre von der Seele’ in Baltes, 2005a: 77–99.)Google Scholar

Baltes, M. (2004). ‘Der Niedergang des delphischen Orakels. Delphis oracula cessant’ in Gebauer, J., Grabow, E., Jünger, F. and Metzler, D. (eds.), Bildergeschichte: Festschrift K. Stähler. Möhnesee: Bibliopolis, 1–15. (Reprinted in Baltes 2005a: 135–54.)Google Scholar

Baltes, M. (2005a). ΕΠΙΝΟΗΜΑΤΑ: Kleine Schriften zur antiken Philosophie und homerischen Dichtung, ed. Lakmann, M.-L.. Munich: K. G. Saur.Google Scholar

Baltes, M. (2005b). ‘Mittelplatonische ἐπιτομαί zu den Werken und der Philosophie Platons’ in Baltes, 2005a: 155–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baltzly, D. (2014). ‘Plato’s Authority and the Formation of Textual Communities’, Classical Quarterly 64: 793–807.Google Scholar

Barbanti, M., Giardina, G. R. and Manganaro, P. (eds.) (2002). ΕΝΩΣΙΣ ΚΑΙ ΦΙΛΙΑ: unione e amicizia: omaggio a Francesco Romano. Catania: CUECM.Google Scholar

Barigazzi, A. (1993). ‘Favorino di Arelate’, ANRW ii. 34.1: 556–81.Google Scholar

Barker, A. (ed. and trans.) (2015). Porphyry’s Commentary on Ptolemy’s Harmonics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1985). ‘Theophrastus and Hypothetical Syllogistic’ in Fortenbaugh, W. W., Huby, P. M. and Long, A. A. (eds.), Theophrastus of Eresus: On His Life and Work. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 125–41.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1991). ‘The Hellenistic Platos’, Apeiron 24: 115–28.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1993a). ‘“A Third Sort of Syllogism”: Galen and the Logic of Relations’ in Sharples, R. W. (ed.), Modern Thinkers and Ancient Thinkers (Keeling Memorial Lectures 1981–91). University College London, 172–94.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1993b). ‘Meaning, Saying, and Thinking’ in Döring, K. and Ebert, T. (eds.), Dialektiker und Logiker: Zur Logik der Stoa und ihrer Vorlaüfer. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 47–61.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1997). Logic and the Imperial Stoa. Leiden and New York: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, J. (1999). ‘Logic. i: The Peripatetics’ in Algra, et al. 1999: 77–83.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (ed. and trans.) (2003a). Porphyry: Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (2003b). ‘Proofs and Syllogisms in Galen’ in Barnes, J. and Jouanna, J. (eds.), Galien et le philosophie = Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique 49. Geneva: Fondation Hardt, 1–24.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. (eds.) (1997). Philosophia Togata II. Plato and Aristotle at Rome. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Barra, G. (1963). ‘La biografia di Platone’, Rendiconti dell’Accademia di archeologia, lettere e belle arti di Napoli 38: 5–18.Google Scholar

Barra, G. (1965). ‘Initia rerum: un passo controverso del “De Platone et ejus dogmate” di Apuleio’, Rendiconti dell’Accademia di archeologia, lettere e belle arti di Napoli 40: 35–42.Google Scholar

Bastianini, G. and Sedley, D. N. (eds.) (1995). ‘Commentarium in Platonis “Theaetetum”’, Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini iii. Florence: Olschki, 227–562.Google Scholar

Becchi, F. (1990). ‘Riflessioni sul pensiero etico di Albino-Alcinoo con una proposta di correzione al testo del Didaskalikos’, Prometheus 16: 269–78.Google Scholar

Becchi, F. (1999). ‘Plutarco tra Platonismo e Aristotelismo: la filosofia come παιδεία dell’anima’ in Pérez Jiménez, , García López, and Aguilar, 1999: 25–43.Google Scholar

Becchi, F. (2012). ‘The Doctrine of the Passions: Plutarch, Posidonius and Galen’ in Lanzillotta, Roig and Gallarte, Muñoz 2012: 43–53.Google Scholar

Bechtle, G. (1999). The Anonymous Commentary on Plato’s ‘Parmenides’. Bern, Stuttgart and Vienna: Paul Haupt.Google Scholar

Bechtle, G. (2006). ‘A Neglected Testimonium (Fragment?) on the Chaldaean Oracles’, Classical Quarterly 56: 563–81.Google Scholar

Bechtle, G. (2012). ‘Categories and Conversion’ in Corrigan, , Turner, and Wakefield, 2012: 107–20.Google Scholar

Beierwaltes, W. (1993). Review of PidA i, Philosophisches Jahrbuch 100: 194–9.Google Scholar

Bellanti, A. (2007). ‘La teoria plutarchea della virtù tra platonismo, pitagorismo e aristotelismo’ in Cacciatore, and Ferrari, 2007: 223–64.Google Scholar

Belletti, B. (1982). ‘La dottrina dell’assimilazione a Dio in Filone di Alessandria’, Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 74: 419–40.Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, T. (2006). ‘Philosophic Schools in Hellenistic and Roman Times’ in Gill, M. L. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), A Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 415–29.Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, T. (2009). ‘Θεωρία et vie contemplative du Stoïcisme au Platonisme: Chrysippe, Panétius, Antiochus et Alcinoos’ in Bonazzi, and Opsomer, 2009: 3–31.Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, T. and Bonazzi, M. (eds.) (2012). Theoria, Praxis and the Contemplative Life after Aristotle and Plato. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, T., Maffi, E. and Trabattoni, F. (eds.) (2011). Plato, Aristotle, or Both? Dialogues between Platonism and Aristotelianism in Antiquity. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York: Georg Olms.Google Scholar

Benko, S. (1980). ‘Pagan Criticism of Christianity During the First Two Centuries ad’, ANRW ii. 23.2, 1055–118.Google Scholar

Berchman, R. M. (1984). From Philo to Origen: Middle Platonism in Transition. Chico, Ca.: Scholars Press.Google Scholar

Bernard, W. (1994). ‘Zur Dämonologie des Apuleius von Madaura’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 137: 358–73.Google Scholar

Betegh, G. and Gregoric, P. (2014). ‘Multiple Analogy in Ps.-Aristotle, De Mundo 6’, Classical Quarterly 64: 574–91.Google Scholar

Bianchi, U. (1986). ‘Plutarco e il dualismo’ in Brenk, and Gallo, 1986: 111–20.Google Scholar

Bianchi, U. (1987). ‘Plutarch und der Dualismus’, ANRW ii. 36.1: 350–65.Google Scholar

Bickel, E. (1960). ‘Senecas Brief 58 und 65: das Antiochus-Posidonius-Problem’, Rheinisches Museum 103: 1–20.Google Scholar

Biggs, C. (1886). The Christian Platonists of Alexandria. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Blume, F. and Mann, F. (eds.) (1983). Platonismus und Christentum: Festschrift für Heinrich Dörrie = Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum Ergänzungsband 10. Munster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar

Blumenthal, H. J. (1972). ‘Plotinus’ Psychology: Aristotle in the Service of Platonism’, International Philosophical Quarterly 12: 340–64.Google Scholar

Blumenthal, H. J. and Markus, R. A. (eds.) (1981). Neoplatonism and Early Christian Thought: Essays in Honour of A. H. Armstrong. London: Variorum.Google Scholar

Bobzien, S. (1998a). Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bobzien, S. (1998b). ‘The Inadvertent Conception and Late Birth of the Free-Will Problem’, Phronesis 43: 133–75.Google Scholar

Bobzien, S. (2000). ‘Did Epicurus Discover the Free Will Problem?’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 19: 287–337.Google Scholar

Bobzien, S. (2002). ‘The Development of Modus Ponens in Antiquity: From Aristotle to the 2nd Century ad’, Phronesis 47: 359–94.Google Scholar

Bobzien, S. (2004). ‘Hypothetical Syllogistic in Galen: Propositional Logic off the Rails?’, Rhizai 1: 57–102.Google Scholar

Bodnár, I. M. (1997). ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias on Celestial Motions’, Phronesis 42: 190–205.Google Scholar

Bohm, R. K. (1973). ‘The Isis Episode in Apuleius’, The Classical Journal 68: 228–31.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2000a). ‘Plotino e la tradizione pitagorica’, Acme 53.2: 39–73.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2000b). ‘Tra Atene e la Palestina: il De Anima di Plutarco e i Cristiani’, Κοινωνία 24: 5–46.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2002). ‘Eudoro di Alessandria e il Timeo di Platone (a proposito di Simpl. In Phys. p. 181, 7–30 Diels)’, in Calabi, 2002a: 11–34; also Hyperboreus: Studia Classica 8: 159–79.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2003a). Academici e Platonici: il dibattito antico sullo scetticismo di Platone. Milan: Edizioni Universitarie di Lettere Economia Diritto.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2003b). ‘Un dibattito tra Academici e Platonici sull’ eredità di Platone’, Papiri Filosofici: Miscellanea di Studi 4: 41–74.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2004a). ‘Contro la rappresentazione sensible: Plutarco tra l’Academia e il Platonismo’, Elenchos 25: 41–71.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2004b). ‘Un lettore antico della Reppublica: Numenio di Apamea’, Méthexis 17: 71–84.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2006). ‘Continuité et rupture entre l’Académie et le Platonisme’, Études Platoniciennes iii. Paris: Belles Lettres, 231–44.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2007a). ‘Eudorus of Alexandria and Early Imperial Platonism’ in Sorabji, and Sharples, 2007: 365–77.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2007b). ‘Eudorus’ Psychology and Stoic Ethics’ in Bonazzi, and Helmig, 2007: 109–31.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2007c). ‘Plutarco, l’Academia e la politica’ in Cacciatore, and Ferrari, 2007: 267–80.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2008). ‘The Commentary as Polemical Tool: The Anonymous Commentator on the Theaetetus against the Stoics’, Laval théologique et philosophique 64: 597–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2009). ‘Antiochus’ Ethics and the Subordination of Stoicism’ in Bonazzi, and Opsomer, 2009: 33–54.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2010). ‘Plutarque et l’immortalité de l’âme’ in Brouillette, and Giavatto, 2010: 77–89.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2011). ‘Il platonismo nel secondo libro dell’ Anthologium di Stobeo: il problema di Eudoro’ in Reydams-Schils, 2011: 441–56.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2012a). ‘Theoria and Praxis: On Plutarch’s Platonism’ in Bénatouïl, and Bonazzi, 2012: 139–61.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2012b). ‘Plutarch on the Difference between the Pyrrhonists and the Academics’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43: 271–98.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2013a) ‘Pythagoreanising Aristotle: Eudorus and the Systematisation of Platonism’ in Schofield, 2013: 160–86.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2013b). ‘Il posto dell’etica nel sistema del Platonismo’ in Pietsch, 2013: 25–33.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2013c). ‘Concezioni stoiche, idee platoniche’, Elenchos 34: 327–50.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2014). ‘Middle Platonists on Fate and Human Autonomy: A Confrontation with the Stoics’ in Destrée, P., Salles, R. and Zingano, M. (eds.), What Is Up to Us? Studies on Agency and Responsibility in Ancient Philosophy. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 283–93.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2015a). ‘La teoria della conoscenza’ in Bonazzi, , Donini, and Ferrari, 2015: 339–57.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2015b). ‘Numenio, il platonismo e le tradizioni orientali’ in Dualismes = Χώρα: Revue d’études anciennes et médiévales, special issue, 225–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2016a). ‘Platonismo e Gnosticismo’ in Galand, and Malaspina, 2016: 25–37.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2016b). ‘The Perfidious Strategy; or, the Platonists against Stoicism’ in Weisser, S. and Thaler, N. (eds.), Strategies of Polemics in Greek and Roman Philosophy. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 166–84.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2017). ‘A New Text by Apuleius? A Review Article of Stover, J. A. (ed.), A New Work by Apuleius: The Lost Third Book of the De Platone [Apuleius] (Oxford, 2016)’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 53: 215–36.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. and Chiaradonna, R. (2012). ‘Prima di Plotino: le correnti filosofiche in età imperiale’ in Chiaradonna, 2012a: 25–46.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M., Donini, P. and Ferrari, F. (eds.) (2015). Sistema, tradizioni, esegesi. Il Medioplatonismo = Rivista di Storia della Filosofia n.s. 2.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. and Helmig, C. (eds.) (2007). Platonic Stoicism – Stoic Platonism: The Dialogue Between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity. Leuven University Press.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M., Lévy, C. and Steel, C. (eds.) (2007). A Platonic Pythagoras: Platonism and Pythagoreanism in the Imperial Age. Brepols: Turnhout.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. and Opsomer, J. (eds.) (2009). The Origins of the Platonic System: Platonisms of the Early Empire and their Philosophical Contexts. Louvain, Namur, Paris and Walpole, Mass.: Éditions Peeter / Société des Études Classiques.Google Scholar

Bos, A. P. (1989). Cosmic and Meta-Cosmic Theology in Aristotle’s Lost Dialogues. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Bos, A. P. (2004). ‘The Dreaming Kronos as World Archon in Plutarch’s de facie in orbe lunae’ in de Blois, L., Kessels, J. B. T. and Schenkeveld, D. M. (eds.), The Statesman in Plutarch’s Works: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the International Plutarch Society. Vol. 1: Plutarch’s Statesman and His Aftermath: Political, Philosophical, and Literary Aspects. Leiden: Brill, 175–87.Google Scholar

Boulogne, J. (1996). ‘Plutarque et la médecine’, ANRW ii. 37.3: 2762–92.Google Scholar

Boulogne, J. (2008). ‘Les digressions scientifiques dans les Vies de Plutarque’ in Nikolaidis, 2008: 733–49.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (1997a). ‘Thyrsus-Bearer of the Academy or Enthusiast for Plato? Plutarch’s de Stoicorum repugnantiis’, in Mossman, J. (ed.), Plutarch and His Intellectual World. London: Duckworth, 41–58.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (1997b). ‘Plutarch on the Probable Principle of Cold: Epistemology and the de primo frigido’, Classical Quarterly 47: 227–38.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (2001). Post-Hellenistic Philosophy: A Study of Its Development from the Stoics to Origen. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (2003). ‘The Stoics’ Two Types of Allegory’, in Boys-Stones, G. R. (ed.), Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition: Ancient Thought and Modern Revisions. Oxford University Press, 189–216.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (2005). ‘Alcinous, Didaskalikos 4: In Defence of Dogmatism’, in Bonazzi, M. and Celluprica, V. (eds.), L’eredità platonica: studi sul platonismo da Arcesilao a Proclo. Naples: Bibliopolis, 201–34.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (2007a). ‘Physiognomy in Ancient Philosophy’ in Swain, S. et al., Seeing the Face, Seeing the Soul: Polemon’s Physiognomy from Classical Antiquity to Medieval Islam. Oxford University Press, 19–124.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (2007b). ‘“Middle” Platonists on Fate and Human Autonomy’ in Sorabji, and Sharples, 2007: 431–47.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (2007c). ‘Human Autonomy and Divine Revelation in Origen’ in Swain, S., Harrison, S. and Elsner, J. (eds.), Severan Culture. Cambridge University Press, 488–99.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (2009a). ‘Cornutus und sein philosophisches Umfeld: Der Antiplatonismus der Epidrome’ in Nesselrath, H. G. (ed.), Cornutus: Die griechischen Götter. Ein Überlick über Namen, Bilder und Deutungen. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 141–61.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (2009b). ‘Ancient Philosophy of Religion: An Introduction’ in Oppy, and Trakakis, 2009: 1–22.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (2011). ‘Time, Creation and the Mind of God: The Afterlife of a Platonist Theory in Origen’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 40: 319–37.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (2012a). ‘Antiochus’ Metaphysics’ in Sedley, 2012b: 220–36.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (2012b). ‘Harpocration of Argos: Etymology and Metaphysics in the Platonist Revival’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 132: 1–6.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (2013a). ‘The Consolatio ad Apollonium: Therapy for the Dead’ in Baltussen, H. (ed.), Greek and Roman Consolations: Eight Studies of a Tradition and Its Afterlife. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales, 123–37.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (2013b). ‘Seneca against Plato: Letters 58 and 65’ in Long, A. G. (ed.), Plato and the Stoics. Cambridge University Press, 128–46.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (2014). ‘Unity and the Good: Platonists against οἰκείωσις’ in Collette-Dučić, B. and Delcomminette, S. (eds.), Unité et origine des vertus dans la philosophie anciennes. Brussels: Éditions Ousia, 297–320.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (2016). ‘Philosophy as Religion and the Meaning of “Providence” in Middle Platonism’ in Eidenow, E., Kindt, J. and Osborne, R. (eds.), Theologies of Ancient Greek Religion. Cambridge University Press, 317–38.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (2017). ‘Are We Nearly There Yet? Eudorus on Aristotle’s Categories’ in Engberg-Pedersen, 2017: 67–79.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (forthcoming a). ‘Numenius on Intellect, Soul, and the Authority of Plato’ in Bryan, J., Wardy, R. and Warren, J. (eds.), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (forthcoming b). ‘Introduction’ in Boys-Stones, L. Annaeus Cornutus: The Greek Theology, Fragments and Testimonia. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (forthcoming c). ‘The Hypothesis of Platonic Authority in Plutarch’s E at Delphi’.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. and Rowe, C. J. (2013). The Circle of Socrates: Readings in the First-Generation Socratics. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Bozonis, G. (1976). ‘A Criticism of Two of Atticus’ Arguments Against Aristotle’, Diotima 4: 53–7.Google Scholar

Brancacci, A. (ed.) (2000). La filosofia in età imperiale: le scuole e le tradizioni filosofiche. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. E. (1973). ‘“A Most Strange Doctrine”: Daimon in Plutarch’, The Classical Journal 69: 1–11.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. E. (1986). ‘In the Light of the Moon: Demonology in the Early Imperial Period’, ANRW ii. 16.3: 2068–145.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. E. (1987a). ‘An Imperial Heritage: The Religious Spirit of Plutarch of Chaeironeia’, ANRW ii. 36.1: 248–349. (Revised version in Brenk 2017.)Google Scholar

Brenk, F. E. (1987b). ‘From Rex to Rana: Plutarch’s Treatment of Nero’ in Cerasa-Gastaldo, A. (ed.), Il protagonismo nella storiografia classica. Geneva: Università di Genova, 121–42. (Reprinted in Brenk 1998a: 82–103.)Google Scholar

Brenk, F. E. (1988). ‘“Erotikos”: The Drag down Pulled up’ in Marcovich, M., Brenk, F. E. and Hershbell, J. P. (eds.), Plutarch = Illinois Classical Studies 13: 457–71.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. E. (1991). ‘Tempo come struttura nel dialogo “Sul Daimonion di Socrate” di Plutarco’, in d’Ippolito, G. and Gallo, I. (eds.), Strutture formali dei ‘Moralia’ di Plutarco. Naples: M. d’Auria, 69–82.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. E. (1992). ‘Darkly Beyond the Glass: Middle Platonism and the Vision of the Soul’ in Gersh, and Kannengiesser, 1992: 39–60. (Reprinted in Brenk 1998a: 269–90.)Google Scholar

Brenk, F. E. (1994). ‘The Origin and the Return of the Soul in Plutarch’ in García Valdés, M. (ed.), Estudios sobre Plutarco: ideas religiosas. Actas del III Simposio Internacional sobre Plutarco. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas: Madrid, 3–24. (Reprinted in Brenk 1998a: 28–49.)Google Scholar

Brenk, F. E. (1996). ‘Time as Structure in Plutarch’s The Daimonion of Sokrates’ in Van der Stockt, L. (ed.), Plutarchea Lovaniensia: A Miscellany of Essays on Plutarch. Leuven: Peeters, 29–51. (Reprinted in Brenk 1998a: 59–81.)Google Scholar

Brenk, F. E. (1997). ‘Plutarch, Judaism and Christianity’ in Joyal, 1997: 97–117.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. E. (1998a). Relighting the Souls: Studies in Plutarch, in Greek Literature, Religion, and Philosophy, and in the New Testament Background. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. E. (1998b). ‘Genuine Greek Demons, “In Mist Apparelled”? Hesiod and Plutarch’ in Brenk, 1998a: 170–81.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. E. (1999). ‘“Isis Is a Greek Word”: Plutarch’s Allegorization of Egyptian Religion’ in Pérez Jiménez, , García López, and Aguilar, 1999: 227–38.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. E. (2002). ‘Religion under Trajan: Plutarch’s Resurrection of Osiris’ in Stadter, and Van der Stockt, 2002: 73–92.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. E. (2003).‘Finding One’s Place: Eschatology in Plato’s Laws and First-century Platonism’, Scolnicov, S. and Brisson, L. (eds.), Plato’s Laws: From Theory into Practice. International Plato Studies 15. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 312–19.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. E. (2005). ‘Plutarch’s Middle-Platonic God: About to Enter (or Remake) the Academy’ in Graf, F., Kippenberg, H. G. and Sullivan, L. E. (eds.), Religionsgeschichtliche Versuche und Vorarbeiten (Berlin and New York: de Gruyter), 28–49.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. E. (2014). ‘Philo and Plutarch on the Nature of God’ in Runia, D. T. and Sterling, G. E. (eds.), Studia Philonica Annual 26 (Studies in Hellenistic Judaism). Atlanta, Ga.: Society of Biblical Literature, 69–92.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. E. (2017). Plutarch, Religious Thinker and Biographer: ‘The Religious Spirit of Plutarch of Chaironeia’ and ‘The Life of Mark Antony’, ed. Lanzillotta, L. Roig with the collaboration of Lesage, L.. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. E. and Gallo, I. (eds.) (1986). Miscellanea Plutarchea: Atti del I convegno di studi su Plutarco = Quaderni del Giornale Filologico Ferrarese 8. Ferrara: Giornale Filologico Ferrarese.Google Scholar

Brisson, L. (1987).‘Amélius: sa vie, son oeuvre, sa doctrine, son style’, ANRW ii. 36.2: 793–860.Google Scholar

Brisson, L. (1999). ‘The Platonic Background in the Apocalypse of Zostrianos: Numenius and Letter ii attributed to Plato’ in Cleary, 1999: 173–88.Google Scholar

Brisson, L. (2000). ‘Le commentaire comme prière destinée à assurer le salut de l’âme: le place et le rôle des Oracles Chaldaïques dans le commentaire sur le Timée de Platon par Proclus’ in Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (ed.), Le Commentaire entre tradition et innovation, with the editorial collaboration of Dorandi, T., Goulet, R., Hugonnard-Roche, H., Le Boulluec, A. and Ornato, E.. Paris: Vrin, 329–53.Google Scholar

Brisson, L. (2003). ‘Plato’s Timaeus and the Chaldaean Oracles’ in Reydams-Schils, 2003: 111–32.Google Scholar

Brittain, C. F. (2001). Philo of Larissa: The Last of the Academic Sceptics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brittain, C. F. (2003). ‘Attention Deficit in Plotinus and Augustine: Pyschological Problems in Christian and Platonist Theories of the Grades of Virtue’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 18: 223–63.Google Scholar

Brittain, C. F. (2007). ‘Middle Platonists on Academic Scepticism’ in Sorabji, and Sharples, 2007: 297–315.Google Scholar

Brittain, C. F. (2012). ‘Antiochus’ Epistemology’ in Sedley, 2012b: 104–30.Google Scholar

Broadie, S. (2007). ‘Why No Platonistic Ideas of Artefacts?’ in Scott, D. (ed.), Maieusis: Essays on Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat. Oxford University Press, 232–53.Google Scholar

Broadie, S. (2012). Nature and Divinity in Plato’s Timaeus. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brouillette, X. (2010). ‘Apollon au-delà de tout ce qui est visible: Plutarque et République 6, 509B’ in Brouillette, and Giavatto, 2010: 29–46.Google Scholar

Brouillette, X. and Giavatto, A. (eds.) (2010a). Les dialogues platoniciens chez Plutarque: stratégies et méthodes exégétiques. Leuven University Press.Google Scholar

Brouillette, X. and Giavatto, A. (2010b). ‘Les dialogues platoniciens chez Plutarque: une introduction’ in Brouillette, and Giavatto, 2010a: 1–25.Google Scholar

Buffière, F. (1956). Les mythes d’Homère et la pensée grecque. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. (1978). ‘The Philosophical Sense of Theaetetus’ Mathematics’, Isis 69: 489–513.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. (1982). ‘Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed’, Philosophical Review 91: 3–40.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. (2005). ‘Platonism in the Bible: Numenius of Apamea on Exodus and Eternity’ in Salles, 2005: 143–69.Google Scholar

Cacciatore, P. V. and Ferrari, F. (eds.) (2007). Plutarco e la cultura della sua età. Atti del X Convegno plutarcheo. Naples: M. D’Auria.Google Scholar

Calabi, F. (ed.) (2002a). Arrhetos Theos: l’ineffabilità del primo principio nel medio platonismo. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.Google Scholar

Calabi, F. (2002b). ‘Conoscibilità e inconoscibilità di dio in Filone di Alessandria’ in Calabi, 2002a: 35–54.Google Scholar

Caldini-Montanari: see Montanari Caldini.Google Scholar

Caluori, D. (2015). Plotinus on the Soul. Cambridge Unversity Press.Google Scholar

Calvetti, G. (1977). ‘Eudoro di Alessandria: medioplatonismo e neopitagorismo nel i secolo a.c.’, Rivista di Filosofia Neoscolastica 69: 3–19.Google Scholar

Capelle, O. (1927). ‘Lukios (1)’, Paulys Real-Encyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft xiii. 2. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 1791–7.Google Scholar

Caquot, A., Hadas-Lebel, M. and Riaud, J. (eds.) (1986). Hellenica et Judaica: hommage à Valentin Nikiprowetzky. Leuven and Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar

Carlini, A. (1994). ‘Il commento anonimo al Teeteto e il testo di Platone’, in Storia, poesia e pensiero nel mondo antico: studi in onore di Marcello Gigante. Naples: Bibliopolis, 83–91.Google Scholar

Carlini, A. (1995). ‘Commentarium in Platonis “Phaedonem” (?)’, Corpus dei Papiri Filosofici e Latini iii. Florence: Olschki, 203–20.Google Scholar

Carpenter, A. (2010). ‘Embodied Intelligent (?) Souls: Plants in Plato’s Timaeus’, Phronesis 281–303.Google Scholar

Casanova, A. (ed.) (2005). Plutarco e l’età ellenistica. Florence: Università degli studi di Firenze.Google Scholar

Castner, C. (1988). Prosopography of Roman Epicureans from the Second Century B.C. to the Second Century A.D. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Caston, V. (1999). ‘Something and Nothing: The Stoics on Concepts and Universals’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17: 145–213.Google Scholar

Catana, L. (2013). ‘The Origin of the Division between Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism’, Apeiron 46: 166–200.Google Scholar

Centrone, B. (1987). ‘Alcune osservavoni sui Placita di Platone in Diogene Laerzio III 67-80’, Elenchos 8: 105–18.Google Scholar

Centrone, B. (1990). Pseudopythagorica Ethica: I trattati morali di Archita, Metopo, Teage, Eurifamo. Introduction, edition, translation, commentary. Elenchos 17. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar

Centrone, B. (2000). ‘Cosa significa essere pitagorico in età imperiale: per una riconsiderazione della categoria storiografica del neopitagorismo’ in Brancacci, 2000: 136–68.Google Scholar

Chadwick, H. (1967).‘Philo’ in Armstrong, 1967: 137–57.Google Scholar

Chase, M. (2011). ‘Individus et description: contribution à une histoire du problème de la connaissance des individus dans la philosophie néoplatonicienne’, Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 95: 3–36Google Scholar

Chaumartin, F.-R. (1993). ‘Sénèque et le platonisme: à propos des lettres 58 et 65’ in Dixsaut, M. (ed.), Contre Platon I: Le platonisme dévoilé. Paris: Vrin, 103–15.Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. (1949). Review of Louis, P. (ed. and trans.), Albinos: Epitomé (Paris: Belles Lettres, 1945), American Journal of Philology 70: 76–80.Google Scholar

Chesnut, G. F. (1978). ‘The Rule and the Logos in Neopythagorean, Middle Platonist, and Late Stoic Political Philosophy’, ANRW ii. 16.2: 1310–32.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2000). ‘La teoria dell’individuo in Porfirio’, Elenchos 21: 303–31.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2007a). ‘Platonismo e teoria della conoscenza stoica tra ii e iii secolo d.C.’ in Bonazzi, and Helmig, 2007: 209–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2007b). ‘Porphyry’s View on the Immanent Incorporeals’ in Karamanolis, G. and Sheppard, A. (eds.), Studies on Porphyry. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 35–49.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2008). ‘Hylémorphisme et causalité des intelligibles: Plotin et Alexandre d’Aphrodise’, Études Philosophiques 86: 379–97.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2009a). ‘Autour d’Eudore: les débuts de l’exégèse des Catégories dans le Moyen Platonisme’ in Bonazzi, and Opsomer, 2009: 89–111.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2009b). ‘Galen and Middle Platonism’ in Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T. and Wilkins, J. (eds.), Galen and the World of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press, 242–60.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (ed.) (2012a). Filosofia tardoantica. Rome: Carocci editore.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2012b). ‘Nota su partecipazione e atto d’essere nel neoplatonismo: l’anonimo Commento al Parmenide’, Studia graeco-arabica 2:87–97.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2014). ‘Plotinus on Sensible Particulars and Individual Essences’ in Torrance, A. and Zachhuber, J. (eds.), Individuality in Late Antiquity. Farnham: Ashgate, 47–61.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2015a). ‘Plotinus’ Account of Demiurgic Causation and Its Philosophical Background’ in Marmodoro, A. and Price, B. D. (eds.), Causation and Creation in Late Antiquity. Cambridge University Press, 31–50.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2015b). ‘Medioplatonismo e aristotelismo’ in Bonazzi, , Donini, and Ferrari, 2015: 425–46.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (forthcoming). ‘Galen and Middle Platonists on Dialectic and Knowledge’ in Bénatouïl, T. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.), Dialectic in the Hellenistic Age.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R., Rashed, M., and Sedley, D. (2013). ‘A Rediscovered Categories Commentary’ with palaeographical appendix by Tchernetska, N., Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 44: 129–94.Google Scholar

Chlup, R. (2000).‘Plutarch’s Dualism and the Delphic Cult’, Phronesis 45: 138–58.Google Scholar

Cleary, J. J. (ed.) (1999). Traditions of Platonism: Essays in Honour of John Dillon. Aldershot and Brookfield, Vt.: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Collette-Dučić, B. (2011–12). ‘Sommeil, éveil et attention chez Plotin’, Χώρα: Revue d’Études Anciennes et Médiévales 9–10: 259–81.Google Scholar

Corrigan, K. (2000).‘Platonism and Gnosticism: The Anonymous Commentary on the Parmenides: Middle or Neoplatonic?’ in Turner, and Majercik, 2000: 141–77.Google Scholar

Corrigan, K. (2012). ‘Religion and Philosophy in the Platonic Tradition’ in Corrigan, , Turner, and Wakefield, 2012: 19–34.Google Scholar

Corrigan, K., Turner, J. D. and Wakefield, P. (eds.) (2012). Religion and Philosophy in the Platonic and Neoplatonic Traditions: From Antiquity to the Medieval Period. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar

Corvisier, J.-N. (2001). ‘Les préceptes de santé de Plutarque et leur place dans la littérature comparable’ in Corvisier, J.-N., Didier, C. and Valdher, M. (eds.), Thérapies, médicine et démographie antiques. Arras Cedex: Artois Presses Université, 137–56.Google Scholar

Courcelle, P. (1943). Les lettres grecques en occident de Macrobe à Cassiodore. Paris: E. de Boccard.Google Scholar

Courcelle, P. (1971).‘Philon d’Alexandrie et le précepte delphique’ in Palmer, and Hamerton-Kelly, 1971: 245–50.Google Scholar

Creese, D. (2010). The Monochord in Ancient Greek Harmonic Science. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Creese, D. (2012). ‘Rhetorical uses of Mathematical Harmonics in Philo and Plutarch’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43: 258–69Google Scholar

Crouzel, H. (1956). Théologie de l’image de dieu chez Origène. Aubier: Éditions Montaigne.Google Scholar

Crouzel, H. (1977). ‘Le thème platonicien de “véhicule de l’âme” chez Origène’, Didaskalia 7: 225–37.Google Scholar

Crouzel, H. (1987). ‘Qu’est-ce qui Correspond chez Origène a la troisième Hypostase Plotinienne l’âme du monde?’ in ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΙΝΑ. Hellénisme, judaïsme et christianisme à Alexandrie. Mélanges offerts à P. Claude Mondésert (Paris: CERF), 203–20.Google Scholar

Culham, P. (1992). ‘Plutarch on the Roman Siege of Syracuse: The Primacy of Science over Technology’ in Gallo, 1992: 179–97.Google Scholar

Cumont, F. (1915). ‘Les anges du paganisme’, Revue de l’Histoire des Religions 72: 159–82.Google Scholar

Cuomo, S. (2001). Ancient Mathematics. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Curry, C. (1988). ‘The Theogony of Theophilus’, Vigiliae Christianae 42: 318–26.Google Scholar

D’Ancona, C. (2002). Review of Reis 1999b, Mnemosyne 55: 613–26.Google Scholar

D’Hoine, P. (2006a). ‘Proclus and Syrianus on Ideas of Artefacts: A Test Case for Neoplatonic Hermeneutics’ in Perkams, and Piccione, 2006: 279–302.Google Scholar

D’Hoine, P. (2006b). ‘The Status of the Arts: Proclus’ Theory of Artefacts’, Elenchos 27: 305–44.Google Scholar

D’Hoine, P. (2011). ‘Forms of symbebêkota in the Neoplatonic Commentaries on Plato and Aristotle’ in Bénatouïl, , Maffi, and Trabattoni, 2011: 161–87.Google Scholar

D’Hoine, P. and Van Riel, H. (eds.) (2014). Fate, Providence and Moral Responsibility in Ancient, Medieval and Early Modern Thought: Studies in Honour of Carlos Steel. Leuven University Press.Google Scholar

Da Rocha Júnior, R. A. (2008). ‘Plutarch and the Music’ in Nikolaidis, 2008: 651–6.Google Scholar

dal Pra, M. (1950). La storiografia filosofica antica. Milan: Fratelli Booca.Google Scholar

Dawson, D. (1992). Allegorical Readers and Cultural Revision in Ancient Alexandria. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar

de Ley, H. (1967). ‘Le traité sur l’emplacement des enfers chez Macrobe’, L’Antiquité Classique 36: 190–208.Google Scholar

de Ley, H. (1972). Macrobius and Numenius: A Study of Macrobius, In Somn., I. c. 12. Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar

de Vogel, C. J. (1953). ‘On the Neoplatonic Character of Platonism and the Platonic Character of Neoplatonism’, Mind 62: 43–64.Google Scholar

de Vogel, C. J. (1954). ‘À la recherche des étapes précises entre Platon et le néo-Platonisme’, Mnemosyne 7: 111–22.Google Scholar

de Vogel, C. J. (1959). Greek Philosophy: A Collection of Texts with Notes and Explanations. Vol. 3: The Hellenistic-Roman Period. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

de Vogel, C. J. (1983). ‘Der sog. Mittelplatonismus, überwiegend eine Philosophie der Diesseitigkeit?’ in Blume, and Mann, 1983: 277–302.Google Scholar

DeFilippo, J. G. (1991). Review of Johnston 1990, Bryn Mawr Classical Review http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/1991/02.06.11.html.Google Scholar

Deitz, L. (1987). ‘Bibliographie du platonisme impérial antérieur à Plotin: 1926-1986’, ANRW ii. 36.1: 124–82.Google Scholar

den Boeft, J. (1970). Calcidius on Fate: His Doctrine and Sources. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

des Places, É. (ed.) (1973a). Numénius: Fragments. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

des Places, É. (1973b). ‘Le “Dieu incertain” des Juifs’, Journal des Savants 1973: 289–94. (Reprinted in des Places 1981: 195–9.)Google Scholar

des Places, É. (1973c). ‘La Matière dans le Platonisme Moyen surtout chez Numénius et dans les Oracles chaldaïques’ in aa. vv. 1973: 215–23. (Reprinted in des Places 1981: 285–9.)Google Scholar

des Places, É. (1974). ‘Études récentes (1953–1973) sur le platonisme moyen du ii^e siècle après J.-C.’, Bulletin de l’Association G. Budé 33: 347–58. (Reprinted in des Places 1981: 273–84.)Google Scholar

des Places, É. (1975). ‘Du Dieu jaloux au nom incommunicable’ in Bingen, J., Cambier, G. and Nachtergael, G. (eds.), Le monde grec: pensée, littérature, histoire, documents. Hommages à Cl. Préaux. University of Brussels, 338–42. (Reprinted in des Places 1981: 305–9.)Google Scholar

des Places, É. (ed.) (1977). Atticus: Fragments. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

des Places, É. (1981). Études Platoniciennes 1929–1979. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

des Places, É. (1984). ‘Platonisme moyen et apologétique chrétienne au ii^e siècle ap. J.-C. Numénius, Atticus, Justin’, Studia Patristica 15: 432–41.Google Scholar

Desmond, W. (2011). Philosopher-Kings of Antiquity. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Deuse, W. (1983). Untersuchungen zur mittelplatonischen und neuplatonischen Seelenlehre. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar

Di Pasquale Barbanti, M. and Martello, C. (eds.) (2006). Neoplatonismo pagano vs neoplatonismo cristiano: identità e intersezioni. Catania: CUECM.Google Scholar

Di Stefano, E. (2010). La triade divina in Numenio: un’ anticipazione della telologi neoplatonica. Symbolon 38. Catania: CUECM.Google Scholar

Diels, H. and Schubart, W. (eds.)(1905). Anonymer Kommentar zu Platos Theaetet (Papyrus 9728). Berliner Klassikertexte. Berlin: Generalverwaltung der Königlichen Museen zu Berlin.Google Scholar

Dihle, A. (1982). The Theory of Will in Classical Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Dihle, A. (1986). ‘Freiheit und Schicksal in der hellenistischen Philosophie’ in Hennig, H. et al. (eds.), Max-Planck-Gymnasium: Festschrift zum Jubiläum des ältesten Göttinger Gymnasiums 1586–1986. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 174–82.Google Scholar

Dihle, A. (1987). ‘Philosophische Lehren von Schicksal und Freiheit in der früchristlichen Theologie’, Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum 30: 14–28.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1969). ‘A Date for the Death of Nicomachus of Gerasa?’, Classical Quarterly 19: 274–5.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1973). ‘The Concept of Two Intellects: A Footnote in the History of Platonism’, Phronesis 18: 176–85. (Reprinted in Dillon 1990: ch. 16.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1975). ‘The Transcendence of God in Philo: Some Possible Sources’, Center for Hermeneutical Studies 16: 1–8. (Reprinted in Dillon 1990: ch. 9.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1977a). The Middle Platonists 80 B.C. to A.D. 220. London: Duckworth. (Revised edn with a new afterword published 1996.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1977b). ‘The Platonizing of Mithra’, Journal of Mithraic Studies 2: 79–85.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1979). ‘The Academy in the Middle Platonic Period’, Dionysius 3: 63–77. (Reprinted in Dillon 1990: ch. 3.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1980). ‘The Descent of the Soul in Middle Platonic and Gnostic Theory’ in Heerma van Voss, H., Sharpe, E. J. and Werblowsky, R. J. Z (eds.), The Rediscovery of Gnosticism. Vol. i. Leiden: Brill, 357–64.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1982a). ‘Origen’s Doctrine of the Trinity and Some Later Neoplatonic Theories’ in O’Meara, 1982: 19–33. (Reprinted in Dillon 1990: ch. 21.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1982b). ‘Self-Definition in Later Platonism’ in Meyer, B. E. and Sanders, E. P. (eds.), Jewish and Christian Self-Definition. Vol. iii: Self-Definition in the Greco-Jewish World. London: SCM; Philadelphia: Fortress, 60–75. (Reprinted in Dillon 1990: ch. 2.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1983a). ‘The Formal Structure of Philo’s Allegorical Exegesis’ in Winston, and Dillon, 1983: 77–87. (Reprinted in J. Glucker and A. Laks (eds.), Jacob Bernays, un philologue juif, Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, 123–31; and again in Dillon 1997: ch. 5.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1983b). ‘Philo’s Doctrine of Angels’ in Winston, and Dillon, 1983: 197–205.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1983c). ‘The Nature of God in the “Quod Deus”’ in Winston, and Dillon, 1983: 217–27.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1983d). ‘Metriopatheia and Apatheia: Some Reflections on a Controversy in Later Greek Ethics’ in Anton, J. P. and Preus, A. (eds.), Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, vol. ii. Albany: SUNY, 508–17. (Reprinted in Dillon 1990: ch. 8.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1986a). ‘Aisthêsis Noêtê: A Doctrine of Spiritual Senses in Origen and in Plotinus’ in Caquot, , Hadas-Lebel, and Riaud, (1986), 443–55. (Reprinted in Dillon 1990: ch. 19.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1986b). ‘Plutarch and Second Century Platonism’ in Armstrong, A. H. (ed.), Classical Mediterranean Spirituality. Egyptian, Greek, Roman = World Spirituality: An Encyclopedic History of the Religious Quest 15. New York: Crossroad, 214–29. (Reprinted in Dillon 1990: ch. 13.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1986c). ‘Female Principles in Platonism’, Itaca 1: 107–23. (Reprinted in Dillon 1990: ch. 4.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1988a). ‘Looking on the Light: Some Remarks on the Imagery of Light in the First Chapters of the Peri Archon’ in Kannengiesser, C. and Petersen, W. L., Origen of Alexandria. His World and His Legacy. University of Notre Dame Press, 215–30. (Reprinted in Dillon 1990: ch. 22.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1988b). ‘“Orthodoxy” and “Eclecticism”. Middle Platonists and Neo-Pythagoreans’ in Dillon, and Long, 1988: 103–25. (Reprinted in Dillon 1997a: ch. 6.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1988c). ‘Plutarch and Platonist Orthodoxy’, Illinois Classical Studies 13: 357–64.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1988d). ‘Late Platonism’, Classical Review 38: 71–3. (A review of Gersh 1986.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1989a). ‘Tampering with the Timaeus: Ideological Emendations in Plato, with Special Reference to the Timaeus’, American Journal of Philology 110: 50–72. (Reprinted in Dillon 1990: ch. 5.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1989b). ‘Logos and Trinity: Patterns of Platonist Influence on Early Christianity’ in Vessey, G. (ed.), The Philosophy in Christianity. Cambridge University Press, 1–13. (Reprinted in Dillon 1997a: ch. 8.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1989c). ‘The Theory of Three Classes of Men in Plotinus and Philo’ in Link-Salinger, R. (ed.), Scholars, Savants and their Texts: Studies in Philosophy and Religious Thought: Essays in Honour of Arthur Hyman. New York: Peter Lang, 69–76. (Reprinted in Dillon 1990: ch. 20.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1990). The Golden Chain. Aldershot: Variorum.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1992a). ‘Pleroma and Noetic Cosmos: A Comparative Survey’ in Wallis, 1992a: 99–110. (Reprinted in Dillon 1997: ch. 9.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1992b). ‘Plotinus and the Chaldaean Oracles’ in Gersh, and Kannengiesser, 1992: 131–40. (Reprinted, with correction to note numbers, in Dillon 1997: ch. 15.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (trans.) (1993). Alcinous: The Handbook of Platonism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1994a). ‘A Platonist Ars Amatoria’, Classical Quarterly 44: 387–92.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1994b). ‘Calcidius’ (C12) in Goulet, 1989–: ii. 156–7.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1995). ‘Reclaiming the Heritage of Moses: Philo’s Confrontation with Greek Philosophy’, Studia Philonica 7: 108–23. (Reprinted in Dillon 1997a: ch. 3.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1996). ‘Thrasyllus and the Logos’, Apeiron 29: 99–103. (Reprinted in Dillon 2012: ch. 9.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1997a). The Great Tradition: Further Studies in the Development of Platonism and Early Christianity. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1997b). ‘Die Entwicklung des Mittelplatonismus’ in Kobusch, T. and Mojsisch, B. (eds.), Platon in der abendländischen Geistesgeschichte: Neue Forschungen zum Platonismus. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 15–32.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1997c). ‘Plutarch and the End of History’ in Mossman, J. (ed.), Plutarch and His Intellectual World: Essays on Plutarch. London: Duckworth, 233–40. (Reprinted in Dillon 1997: ch. 7.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1997d). ‘The Pleasures and Perils of Soul-Gardening’, Studia Philonica 9: 190–7. (Reprinted in Dillon 2012: ch. 7.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1998). ‘Asômatos: Nuances of Incorporeality in Philo’ in Lévy, C. (ed.), Philon d’Alexandrie et le langage de la philosophie. Turnhout: Brepols, 99–110. (Reprinted in Dillon 2012: ch. 8.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1999). ‘Plutarch’s Debt to Xenocrates’ in Pérez Jiménez, , García López, and Aguilar, 1999: 305–11. (Reprinted in Dillon 2012: ch. 10.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2000). ‘Eudore d’Alexandrie’ (E97) in Goulet, 1989–: iii. 290–3.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2001). ‘Plutarch and the Separable Intellect’ in Pérez Jimenez, A. and Casadesús Bordoy, F. (eds.), Estudios sobre Plutarco: Misticismo y religiones mistéricas en la obra de Plutarco. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas, 35–44. (Reprinted in Dillon 2012: ch. 11.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2002a). ‘Plutarch and God: Theodicy and Cosmogony in the Thought of Plutarch’ in Frede, and Laks, 2002: 223–37. (Reprinted in Dillon 2012: ch. 12.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2002b). ‘An Unknown Platonist on God’ in Barbanti, , Giardina, and Manganaro, 2002: 237–45. (Reprinted in Dillon 2012: ch. 17.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2002c). ‘The Social Role of the Philosopher in the Second Century ce: Some Remarks’ in Stadter, and Van der Stockt, 2002: 29–40. (Reprinted in Dillon 2012: ch. 14.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2006). ‘Pedantry and Pedestrianism? Some Reflections on the Middle Platonic Commentary Tradition’ in Tarrant, and Baltzly, 2006: 19–31. (Reprinted in Dillon 2012: ch. 15.)Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2007).‘Numenius: Some Ontological Questions’ in Sorabji, and Sharples, 2007: 397–402.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2009). ‘Plutarch of Chaeroneia’ in Oppy, and Trakakis, 2009: 159–71.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2010a). ‘Pythagoreanism in Plutarch’ in Nesselrath, H.-G. (ed.), Plutarch: On the Daimonion of Socrates: Human Liberation, Divine Guidance and Philosophy. Introduction, Text, Translation and Interpretative Essays. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 139–44.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2010b). ‘Philo of Alexandria and Platonist Psychology’, Études Platoniciennes 7: 163–9.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2011). ‘The Ideas as Thoughts of God’, Études Platoniciennes 8 (Les Formes platoniciennes dans l’Antiquité tardive): 31–42.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2012). The Platonic Heritage: Further Studies in the History of Platonism and Early Christianity. Ashgate: Variorum.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2013). ‘The Hierarchy of Being as Framework for Platonic Ethical Theory’ in Pietsch, 2013: 91–8.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. and Long, A. A. (eds.) (1988). The Question of ‘Eclecticism’: Studies in Later Greek Philosophy. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Dodds, E. R. (1928). ‘The Parmenides of Plato and the Origin of the Neoplatonic “One”’, Classical Quarterly 22: 129–42.Google Scholar

Dodds, E. R. (1960). ‘Numenius and Ammonius’ in Les Sources de Plotin = Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique 5. Geneva: Fondation Hardt, 1–32. (Trans. in Zintzen 1981: 488–517.)Google Scholar

Dodds, E. R. (1963). Proclus: The Elements of Theology. A Revised Text with Translation, Introduction and Commentary. 2nd edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dodge, B. (ed. and trans.) (1970). The Fihrist of al-Nadīm: A Tenth-Century Survey of Muslim Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Doherty, K. F. (1960). ‘Location of the Platonic Ideas’, Review of Metaphysics 14: 57–72.Google Scholar

Donini, P. (1979). ‘L’eclettismo impossibile: Seneca e il platonismo medio’ in Donini, P. and Gianotti, G. F., Modelli filosofici e letterari: Lucrezio, Orazio, Seneca. Bologna: Pitagora Editrice, 149–300. (Appendix A reprinted as ‘Le fonti medioplatoniche di Seneca: Antioco, la conoscenze e le idee’ in Donini, 2011: 297–313.)Google Scholar

Donini, P. (1980). ‘Motivi filosofici in Galeno’, La parole del passato 35: 333–70.Google Scholar

Donini, P. (1982). Le scuole, l’anima, l’impero: la filosofia antica da Antioco a Plotino. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar

Donini, P. (1986a). ‘Plutarco, Ammonio e l’Academia’ in Brenk, and Gallo, 1986: 97–110. (Reprinted in Donini 2011: 315–26.)Google Scholar

Donini, P. (1986b). ‘Lo scetticismo academico, Aristotele e l’unità della tradizione platonica secondo Plutarco’ in Cambiano, G. (ed.), Storiografia e dossografia nella filosofia antica. Turin: Tirrenia, 204–26.Google Scholar

Donini, P. (1988a). ‘La connaissance de dieu et la hiérarchie divine chez Albinos’ in van den Broek, , Baarda, and Mansfeld, 1988: 118–31. (Reprinted in Donini 2011: 423–36.)Google Scholar

Donini, P. (1988b). ‘The History of the Concept of Eclecticism’ in Dillon, and Long, 1988: 15–33. (Reprinted in Donini 2011: 197–209.)Google Scholar

Donini, P. (1990). ‘Medioplatonismo e filosofi medioplatonic: una raccolta di studi’, Elenchos 11: 79–93. (Reprinted in Donini 2011: 283–96.)Google Scholar

Donini, P. (1992a). ‘Il De Facie di Plutarco e la teologia medioplatonica’ in Gersh, and Kannengiesser, 1992: 103–12.Google Scholar

Donini, P. (1992b). ‘I fondamenti della fisica e la teoria delle cause in Plutarco’ in Gallo, 1992: 99–120. (Reprinted in Donini 2011: 341–57.)Google Scholar

Donini, P. (1992c). ‘Plutarco e i metodi dell’ esegesi filosofica’ in Gallo, I. and Laurenti, R. (eds.), I Moralia di Plutarco tra filologia e filosofia = Strumenti per la Ricerca Plutarchea 1. Pales: M. D’Auria, 79–96.Google Scholar

Donini, P. (1994). ‘Testi e commenti, manuali e insegnamento: la forma sistematica e i metodi della filosofia in età posthellenistica’, ANRW ii. 36.7: 5027–100. (Reprinted in Donini 2011: 211–81.)Google Scholar

Donini, P. (1999a). ‘La giustizia nel medioplatonismo, in Aspasio e in Apuleio’ in Vegetti, and Abbate, 1999: 131–50. (Reprinted in Donini 2011: 179–93.)Google Scholar

Donini, P. (1999b). ‘Platone e Aristotele nella tradizione pitagorica secondo Plutarco’ in Pérez Jiménez, , García López, and Aguilar, 1999: 9–24. (Reprinted in Donini 2011: 359–73.)Google Scholar

Donini, P. (2002). ‘Apuleio: ineffibilità o inconoscibilità del principio?’ in Calabi, 2002a: 93–102.Google Scholar

Donini, P. (2003). ‘L’eredità academica e i fondamenti del platonismo in Plutarco’ in Barbanti, , Giardina, and Manganaro, 2002: 247–73. (Reprinted in Donini 2011: 375–402.)Google Scholar

Donini, P. (2004). ‘Sokrates und sein Dämon im Platonismus des 1. und 2. Jahrhunderts n. Chr.’ in Baltes, M. et al. (eds.), Apuleius, de deo Socratis: Über den Gott des Sokrates. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 142–61. (Reprinted in Donini 2011: 437–52.)Google Scholar

Donini, P. (2007). ‘Tra Academia e pitagorismo: il platonismo nel de genio Socratis de Plutarco’ in Bonazzi, , Lévy, and Steel, 2007: 99–125.Google Scholar

Donini, P. (2009). ‘Il silenzio di Epaminonda, i demoni e il mito: il platonismo di Plutarco nel de genio Socratis’ in Bonazzi, and Opsomer, 2009: 187–214.Google Scholar

Donini, P. (2011). Commentary and Tradition: Aristotelianism, Platonism, and Post-Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. Bonazzi, Mauro. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Donini, P. (2012). ‘Una nuova raccolta di studi su Antioco di Ascalona’, Méthexis 25: 151–64.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (1999). ‘Organization and structure of the philosophical schools’ in Algra, et al. 1999: 55–62.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (2008). ‘Notes critiques et exégétiques aux livres iii à v des Vies des philosophes de Diogène Laërce’, Eikasmos 19: 241–62.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1944). ‘Der Platoniker Eudoros von Alexandreia’, Hermes 79: 25–38. (Reprinted in Dörrie 1976a: 297–309.)Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1954). ‘Zum Ursprung der neuplatonischen Hypostasenlehre’, Hermes 82: 331–42. (Reprinted in Dörrie 1976a: 286–96.)Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1955). ‘Ammonios, der Lehrer Plotins’, Hermes 83: 439–77. (Reprinted in Dörrie 1976a: 324–60.)Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1957a). Review of Andresen, C., Logos und Nomos: die Polemik des Kelsos wider das Christentum (Berlin: de Gruyter), Gnomon 29: 185–96. (Reprinted in Dörrie 1976a: 263–74.)Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1957b). ‘Kontroversen um die Seelenwanderung im kaiserzeitlichen Platonismus’, Hermes 85: 414–35. (Reprinted in Dörrie 1976a: 420–40.)Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1959). Porphyrios’ ‘Symmikta zetemata’: ihre Stellung in System und Geschichte des Neuplatonismus, nebst einem Kommentar zu den Fragmenten. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1960). ‘Die Frage nach dem Tranzendenten im Mittelplatonismus’ in Les Sources de Plotin = Entretiens dur l’Antiquité Classique 5. Geneva: Fondation Hardt, 191–223. (Reprinted in Dörrie 1976a: 211–28.)Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1966). ‘Die Schultradition im Mittelplatonismus und Porphyrios’ in Porphyre = Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique 12. Geneva: Fondation Hardt, 1–25. (Reprinted in Dörrie 1976a: 406–19.)Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1967). ‘Die platonische Theologie des Kelsos in ihrer Auseinandersetzung mit der christlichen Theologie auf Grund von Origenes C. Celsum 7, 42 ff.’, Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen (phil.-hist. Klasse) 2: 19–55. (Reprinted in Dörrie 1976a: 229–62.)Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1969a). ‘Präpositionen und Metaphysik’, Museum Helveticum 26: 217–83. (Reprinted in Dörrie 1976a: 124–36.)Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1969b). ‘Le platonisme de Plutarque’, in Actes du VIIIe Congrès Association Guillaume Budé. Paris: Belles Lettres, 519–29.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1970a). ‘Spätantike Symbolik und Allegorese’, Frümittelalterliche Studien 3: 1–12. (Reprinted in Dörrie 1976a: 112–23.)Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1970b). ‘Der König: ein platonisches Schlüsselwort, von Plotin mit neuem Sinn erfüllt’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 24: 217–35. (Reprinted in Dörrie 1976a: 390–405.)Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1971a). ‘Die Stellung Plutarchs im Platonismus seier Zeit’ in Palmer, and Hamerton-Kelly, 1971: 36–56.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1971b). ‘Die Erneuerung des Platonismus im ersten Jahrhundert vor Christus’ in Le Néoplatonisme. Paris: CNRS, 17–23. (Reprinted in Dörrie 1976a: 154–65.)Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1972a). ‘Une exégèse néoplatonicienne du Prologue de l’Évangile selon Saint Jean’ in Fontaine, and Kannengiesser, 1972: 75–87. (Reprinted in Dörrie 1976a: 491–507.)Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1972b). ‘Was ist “spätantiker Platonismus”? Überlegungen zur Grenzziehung zwischen Platonismus und Christentum’, Theologische Rundschau 36: 285–302. (Reprinted in Dörrie 1976a: 508–23.)Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1973). ‘L. Kalbenos Tauros: Das Persönlichkeitsbild eines platonischen Philosophen im die Mitte des 2. Jahrh. n. Chr.’, Kairos 15: 24–35. (Reprinted in Dörrie 1976a: 310–23.)Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1975a). ‘Logos-Religion? Oder Nous-Theologie? Die hauptsächlichen Aspekte des kaiserzeitlichen Platonismus’ in Mansfeld, J. and de Rijk, L. M. (eds.), Kephalaion: Studies in Greek Philosophy and Its Continuation Offered to Professor C. J. de Vogel. Assen: Van Gorcum, 115–36.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1975b). ‘Die Religiosität des Platonismus im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert nach Christus’ in De Jamblique à Proclus = Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique 21. Geneva: Fondation Hardt, 258–81.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1976a). Platonic Minora. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1976b). ‘Der Platonismus in der Kultur- und Geistesgeschichte der frühen Kaiserzeit’ in Dörrie, 1976a: 166–210.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1976c). ‘Bibliographischer Bericht zum Stand der Forschung zum Mittleren und zum Neueren Platonismus (Versuch einer Bibliographie raisonnée)’ in Dörrie, 1976a: 524–48.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1976d). Von Platon zum Platonismus: ein Bruch in der Überlieferung und seine Überwindung. Rheinisch-Westfälische Akademie der Wissenschaften Vorträge G 211. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1977). ‘Der Begriff “Pronoia” in Stoa und Platonismus’, Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 24: 60–87.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1981a). ‘Gnostische Spuren bei Plutarch’ in van den Broek and Vermaseren 1981: 92–116.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1981b). ‘Formula Analogiae: An Exploration of a Theme in Hellenistic and Imperial Platonism’ in Blumenthal, and Markus, 1981: 33–49.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1981c). ‘Die andere Theologie: Wie stellten die frühchristlichen Theologen des 2.–4. Jahrhunderts ihren Lesern die “Griechische Weisheit” (= den Platonismus) dar?’, Theologie und Philosophie 56: 1–46.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1983). ‘Der “Weise vom Roten Meer”: eine okkulte Offenbarung durch Plutarch als Plagiat entlarvt’ in Händel, P. and Meid, W. (eds.), Festschrift für Robert Muth. Innsbruck: Amse, 95–110.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. et al. (1987–). Der Platonismus in der Antike. Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog. [PidA]Google Scholar

Dragona-Monachou, M. (1994), ‘Divine Providence in the Philosophy of the Empire’, ANRW ii. 36.7: 4417–90.Google Scholar

Drews, F. (2009). Menschliche Willensfreiheit und göttliche Vorsehung bei Augustinus, Proklos, Apuleius und John Milton, 1 vol. in 2. Frankfurt, Lancaster and New Brunswick, NJ: Ontos Verlag.Google Scholar

Duff, T. E. (2011). ‘Plutarch’s Lives and the Critical Reader’ in Roskam, G. and Van der Stockt, L. (eds.), Virtues for the People: Aspects of Plutarchan Ethics. Leuven University Press, 59–82.Google Scholar

Dunn, M. R. (1974). ‘The Organization of the Platonic Corpus between the First Century bc and the Second Century ad’. PhD diss., Yale University.Google Scholar

Dunn, M. R. (1976). ‘Iamblichus, Thrasyllus, and the Reading Order of the Platonic Dialogues’ in Harris, R. B. (ed.), The Significance of Neoplatonism. Norfolk, Va.: International Society for Neoplatonic Studies, 59–80.Google Scholar

Edelstein, E. J. and Edelstein, L. (1945). Asclepius: A Collection and Interpretation of the Testimonies. 2 vols. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. J. (1989). ‘Numenius, fr. 13 (des Places): A Note on Interpretation’, Mnemosyne 42: 478–82.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. J. (1991a). ‘On the Platonic Schooling of Justin Martyr’, Journal of Theological Studies 42: 17–34.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. J. (1991b). ‘Middle Platonism on the Beautiful and the Good’, Mnemosyne 44: 161–7.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. J. (2000). ‘Clement of Alexandria and His Doctrine of the Logos’, Vigiliae Christianae 54: 159–77.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. J. (2002). Origen against Plato. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Eisele, T. (1904). ‘Zur Dämonologie Plutarchs von Chäronea’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 17: 28–51.Google Scholar

Elferink, M. A. (1968). La Descente de l’âme d’après Macrobe. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Eliasson, E. (2008). The Notion of That which Depends on Us in Plotinus and Its Background. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Eliasson, E. (2013). ‘The Middle Platonist Reception of the Myth of Er as a Theory of Fate and That which Depends on Us: The Case of Alcinous’ Didascalicus’ in Sheppard, A. (ed.), The Reception of Plato’s Republic. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 59–85.Google Scholar

Emilsson, E. K. (1988). Plotinus on Sense-Perception: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Emilsson, E. K. (1994). ‘Platonic Soul-Body Dualism in the Early Centuries of the Empire to Plotinus’, ANRW ii. 36.7, 5331–62.Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, T. (2010). ‘Setting the Scene: Stoicism and Platonism in the Transitional Period in Ancient Philosophy’ in Rasimus, T., Engberg-Pedersen, T. and Dunderberg, I. (eds.), Stoicism in Early Christianity. Grand Rapids, Mi.: Baker Academic, 1–14.Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, T. (ed.) (2017). From Stoicism to Platonism: The Development of Philosophy, 100 BCE – 100 CE. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Erler, M. (2013). ‘Hellenistische Elemente in der platonischen praeparatio philosophica der Kaiserzeit (am Beispiel des ἐπιλογισμός bei Plutarch)’ in Pietsch, 2013: 273–82.Google Scholar

Fabricius, J. A. (1716). Bibliotheca Graeca, vol. iii. Hamburg: Bohn.Google Scholar

Feke, J. (2012). ‘Ptolemy’s Defense of Theoretical Philosophy’, Apeiron 45: 61–90.Google Scholar

Feldmeier, R. (2005). ‘Osiris: der Gott der Toten als Gott des Lebens’ in Hirsch-Luipold, 2005: 215–37.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (1995). Dio, idee e materia: la struttura del cosmos in Plutarco di Cheronea = Strumenti per la ricerca plutarchea. Naples: M. D’Auria.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (1996a). ‘La generazione precosmica e la struttura della materia in Plutarco’, Museum Helveticum 53: 44–55.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (1996b). ‘La teoria delle idee in Plutarco’, Elenchos 17: 121–42.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (1996c). ‘Dio: padre e artefice. La teologia di Plutarco in Plat. Quaest. 2’ in Gallo, I. (ed.), Plutarco e la religione: Atti del VI Convegno plutarcheo. Naples: D’Auria, 395–409.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (1996d). ‘Plutarco filosofo platonico’, Cenobio 2: 107–25.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (1998). ‘Galeno interprete del Timeo’, Museum Helveticum 55: 14–34.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (1999a). ‘Πρόνοια platonica e νόησις νοήσεως aristotelica: Plutarco e l’impossibilità di una sintesi’ in Pérez Jiménez, , García López, and Aguilar, 1999: 63–77.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (1999b). ‘Transcendenza e immanenza dell’intellegibile: L’interpretazione plutarchea della metafora della linea’ in Vegetti, and Abbate, 1999: 107–30.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (1999c). ‘Platone, Tim. 35a1–6 in Plutarco, An. Procr. 1012B–C: citazione ed esegesi’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 142: 326–39.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2000a). ‘I commentari specialistici alle sezioni matematiche del Timeo’ in Brancacci, 2000: 169–224.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2000b). ‘Plutarch: Platonismus und Tradition’ in Erler, M. and Graeser, A. (eds.) Philosophen des Altertums. Darmstadt: Primus, 109–27.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2001). ‘Struttura e funzione dell’ esegesi testuale nel medioplatonismo: il caso del Timeo’, Athenaeum 89: 525–74.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2002). ‘La trascedenza razionale: il principio secondo Plutarco’ in Calabi, 2002a: 77–91.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2003). ‘Verso la costruzioine del sistema: il medioplatonismo’, Paradigmi. Rivista di Critica Filosofica 21: 343–54.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2004). ‘Il Timeo degli antichi’, Athenaeum 92: 255–64.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2005a). ‘Dottrina delle idee nel medioplatonismo’ in Fronterotta, F. and Leszl, W. (eds.), Eidos – Idea: Platone, Aristotele e la tradizione platonica. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 233–46.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2005b). ‘Plutarco e lo scetticismo ellenistico’ in Casanova, 2005: 369–84.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2005c). ‘Der Gott Plutarchs und der Gott Platons’ in Hirsch-Luipold, 2005: 13–25.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2006). ‘Poietes kai pater: esegesi medioplatoniche di Timeo, 28c3’ in de Gregorio, G. and Medaglia, S. M. (eds.), Tradizione, ecdotica, esegesi: miscellanea di studi. Naples: Arte tipografica, 43–58.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2008). ‘Moderatismo etico e contollo delle passioni in Plutarco’ in Giardina, G. R. and di Pasquale Barbanti, M. (eds.), Le emozioni secondo i filosofi antichi. Catania: CUECM, 135–62.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2010). ‘Provvidenza platonica o autocontemplazione aristotelica: la scelta di Plutarco’ in Van der Stockt, L., Titchener, F., Ingenkamp, H. G. and Pérez Jiménez, A. (eds.), Gods, Daimones, Rituals, Myths and History of Religion in Plutarch’s Works: Studies devoted to Professor Frederick E. Brenk by the International Plutarch Society. Universidad de Málaga, 177–92.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2012). ‘L’esegesi medioplatonica del Timeo: metodi, finaltà, risultati’ in Celia, F. and Ulacco, A. (eds.), Il Timeo: esegi greche, arabe, latine. With preface by Fioravanti, G.. Pisa University Press, 81–131.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2014). ‘Le système des causes dans le Platonisme moyen’ in Natali, C. and Viano, C. (eds.), Aitia II: le débat sur les causes à l’âge hellénistique et imperial. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters, 185–205.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2015). ‘Metafisica e teologia nel medioplatonismo’ in Bonazzi, , Donini, and Ferrari, 2015: 321–37.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. and Männlein-Robert, I. (forthcoming), ‘Mittelplatonismus und Neupythagoreismus’ in Horn, C., Riedweg, C. and Wyrwa, D. (eds.), Philosophie der Antike, vol. v: Philosophie der Kaiserzeit und der Spätantike. Basel: Schwabe, ch. 6.Google Scholar

Festugière, A. J. (1944–54). La révélation d’Hermès Trismégiste, 4 vols. Paris: Lecoffre.Google Scholar

Festugière, A. J. (1952). ‘Le Compendium Timaei de Galien’, Revue des Études Grecques 65: 97–116. (Reprinted in Festugière 1971: 487–506.)Google Scholar

Festugière, A. J. (1954). ‘L’Âme et la musique, d’après Aristide Quintilien’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 85: 55–78. (Reprinted in Festugière 1971, 463–86.)Google Scholar

Festugière, A. J. (1971). Études de philosophie grecque. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Finamore, J. F. (2006). ‘Apuleius on the Platonic Gods’ in Tarrant, and Baltzly, 2006: 33–48Google Scholar

Finamore, J. F. and Dillon, J. M. (2002). Iamblichus De Anima: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Fine, G. (1993). On Ideas. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fine, G. (2014). The Possibility of Inquiry: Meno’s Paradox from Socrates to Sextus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Flannery, K. L. (1995). Ways into the Logic of Alexander of Aphrodisias. Leiden, New York and Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar

Fletcher, R. (2014). Apuleius’ Platonism: The Impersonation of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fletcher, R. (2015). ‘Platonizing Latin. Apuleius’s Phaedo’ in Williams, G. D. and Volk, K. (eds.), Roman Reflections: Studies in Latin Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 238–59.Google Scholar

Fontaine, J. and Kannengiesser, C. (eds.) (1972). Epektasis: mélanges patristiques offerts au Cardinal Jean Daniélou. Paris: Beauchesne.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. C. (2016). Imperial Plato: Albinus, Maximus, Apuleius. Text and Translation, with an Introduction and Commentary. Las Vegas, Zurich and Athens: Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar

Frazier, F. (2005). ‘Göttlichkeit und Glaube: persönliche Gottesbeziehung im Spätwerk Plutarchs’ in Hirsch-Luipold, 2005: 111–37.Google Scholar

Frazier, F. (2008). ‘Eros, Arès et Aphrodite dans l’Érotikos: une reconsidération de la réponse à Pemptidés (ch. 13–18)’ in Ferreira, J. R., Van der Stockt, L. and do Céu Fialho, M. (eds.), Philosophy in Society: Virtues and Values in Plutarch. Leuven and Coimbra: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, 117–35.Google Scholar

Frede, D. and Laks, A. (eds.) (2002). Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, Its Background and Aftermath. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1974). ‘Stoic vs Aristotelian Syllogistic’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 56: 1–32.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1987). ‘Numenius’, ANRW ii. 36.2: 1034–75.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1990). ‘La teoria de las Ideas de Longino’, Méthexis 3: 85–98.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1994). ‘Celsus philosophus platonicus’, ANRW ii. 36.7: 5183–213.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1999a). ‘Epilogue’ in Algra, et al. 1999: 771–97.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1999b). ‘On the Stoic Conception of the Good’ in Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.), Topics in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 71–94.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (2003). ‘Galen’s Theology’ in Galien et la Philosophie = Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classicque 49. Geneva: Fondation Hardt, 73–126.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (2005). ‘Les Catégories d’Aristote et les Pères de l’Église grecs’ in Bruun, O. and Corti, L. (eds.), Les Catégories et leur histoire. Paris: Vrin, 135–73.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (2011). A Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought, ed. Long, A. A., with a foreword by Sedley, David. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Freudenthal, J. (1879). Hellenistische Studien, vol. iii: Der Platoniker Albinos und der falsche Alkinoos. Berlin: S. Calvary & Co.Google Scholar

Frick, P. (1999). Divine Providence in Philo of Alexandria. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar

Fronterotta, F. (2008). ‘Chiusura causale della fisica razionalità del tutto: alcune opzioni esegetiche sull’efficienza causal delle idee platoniche’, Journal of the International Plato Society 8 (http://gramata.univ-paris1.fr/Plato).Google Scholar

Funghi, M. S. (1984). ‘Un Commentario all’Alcibiade I (Pap.Oxy.1609 + Pap.Princeton Inv. AM 11224 C)’, Zetschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphie 55: 5–6.Google Scholar

Futre Pinheiro, M. and Montiglio, S. (eds.) (2015). Philosophy and the Ancient Novel. Eelde: Barkhuis.Google Scholar

Gaiser, K. (1973). ‘Die Platon-Referate des Alkimos bei Diogenes Laertios (iii 9–17)’ in aa.vv. 1973: 61–79.Google Scholar

Galand, P. and Malaspina, E. (eds.) (2016). Verité et apparance: mélanges en honeur de Carlos Lévy. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar

Gallo, I. (ed.) (1992). Plutarco e le scienze: atti del iv Convegno plutarcheo. Genoa: Sagep.Google Scholar

Gannagé, E. (trans.) (2005). Alexander of Aphrodisias: On Aristotle On Coming to Be and Perishing 2.2–5. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Georgiadou, A. (1992). ‘The Corruption of Geometry and the Problem of Two Mean Proportionals’ in Gallo, 1992: 147–64.Google Scholar

Gercke, A. (1886). ‘Ein platonische Quelle des Neuplatonismus’, Rheinisches Museum 41: 266–91.Google Scholar

Gersh, S. (1986). Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism: The Latin Tradition, 1 vol. in 2. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Gersh, S. (1989). ‘Calcidius’ Theory of First Principles’, Studia Patristica 18.2: 85–92. (Reprinted in S. Gersh Reading Plato, Tracing Plato: From Ancient Commentary to Medieval Reception, Ashgate: Variorum, 2005, ch. 4.)Google Scholar

Gersh, S. and Kannengiesser, C. (eds.) (1992). Platonism in Late Antiquity. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. (1999). ‘The Concept in Platonism’ in Cleary, 1999: 65–80.Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. (2004a). ‘Platonism in Aristotle’s Ethics’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 27: 217–48.Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. (2004b). ‘Platonism and the Invention of the Problem of Universals’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 86: 233–56.Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. (2005a). Aristotle and Other Platonists. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. (2005b). ‘What is Platonism?’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 43: 253–76.Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. (2006). ‘The “Holy Solemnity” of Forms and the Platonic Interpretation of Sophist’, Ancient Philosophy 26: 291–304.Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. (2011). ‘Proclus and the Third Man’, Études Platoniciennes 8: 105–18.Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. (2013). From Plato to Platonism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Gigon, O. (1955). ‘Die Erneuerung der Philosophie in der Zeit Ciceros’ in Recherches sur la Tradition Platonicienne = Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique 3. Geneva: Fondation Hardt, 25–59.Google Scholar

Gigon, O. (1986). ‘Das dritte Buch des Diogenes Laertios’, Elenchos 7: 135–82.Google Scholar

Gili, L. (2011). La sillogistica di Alessandro di Afrodisia. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York: Georg Olms.Google Scholar

Gioè, A. (1991–4). ‘Il medioplatonico Severo: testimonianze e frammenti’, Annali dell’Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Storici 12: 405–37.Google Scholar

Gioè, A. (1993). ‘Severo, il medioplatonismo e le categorie’, Elenchos 14: 33–53.Google Scholar

Gioè, A. (1996). ‘Aspetti dell’esegesi medioplatonica: la manipolazione e l’adattamento delle citazioni’, Rendiconti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei (Classe di Scienze morali, storiche e filologiche) ser. ix, v. 7: 287–309.Google Scholar