Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-594f858ff7-jtv8x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-06-08T06:22:25.558Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "corePageComponentUseShareaholicInsteadOfAddThis": true, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

8 - Crossmodal Plasticity in Early Blindness


Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

Josef P. Rauschecker
Georgetown University Medical Center
Jennifer K. E. Steeves
York University, Toronto
Laurence R. Harris
York University, Toronto
Get access



The plasticity of the mammalian brain – that is, its ability to adapt to environmental situations by changing its connectivity – is one of its most outstanding properties, distinguishing it from most other computational devices. This plasticity is perhaps most striking in the sensory systems that provide input to the brain. The plasticity of sensory systems in higher centers of the brain, such as the cerebral cortex, is the basis for its adaptability to the environment. During individual development, neural plasticity is greater than during adulthood, which is necessitated by the growth of the organism and the need of the brain to get programmed. Although sensory plasticity tapers off in adulthood, it does not cease completely. This chapter deals with the behavioral, anatomical, and physiological plasticity in animals and humans that grow up blind. I discuss plasticity in the somatosensory and auditory systems of visually deprived cats, mice, and humans. Evidence for crossmodal plasticity was acquired using single-unit neurophysiology and neuroanatomy in animal models of early blindness and using imaging techniques in humans. The data support a concept of developmental plasticity whereby major sensory processing modules in the cortex are set up without the influence of sensory experience, but the sensory modality that drives them depends on sensory experience.

Expansion of Whisker-Barrel System in Early-Blind Animals

In rodents, the facial vibrissae, or whiskers, provide one of the most important sources of information to the brain. This is underscored by the fact that rodents possess a special representation in their somatosensory cortex known as barrels that can be visualized with various anatomical and histochemical techniques (Van der Loos and Woolsey, 1973). The barrel cortex shows pronounced intramodal plasticity: when one of the whiskers is removed, the corresponding barrel shrinks. However, this plasticity of the whisker-barrel system is apparent even when sensory deprivation is exerted in a different sensory modality, such as the visual: mice that are reared blind from birth with a binocular enucleation develop significantly longer vibrissae and, correspondingly, an expanded barrel field (Rauschecker et al., 1992; Fig. 8.1). This may be interpreted by increased usage of the whiskers, which leads to not only use-dependent expansion of their central representation but also a hypertrophy of the peripheral sense organ itself.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Amedi, A., Stern, W. M., Camprodon, J. A., Bermpohl, F., Merabet, L., Rotman, S., Hemond, C., Meijer, P. and Pascual-Leone, A. (2007). Shape conveyed by visual-to-auditory sensory substitution activates the lateral occipital complex. Nat. Neurosci., 10: 687–689.Google Scholar
Arno, P., De Volder, A. G., Vanlierde, A., Wanet-Defalque, M. C., Streel, E., Robert, A., Sanabria-Bohorquez, S. and Veraart, C. (2001). Occipital activation by pattern recognition in the early blind using auditory substitution for vision. Neuroimage, 13: 632–645.Google Scholar
Büchel, C., Price, C., Frackowiak, R. S. and Friston, K. (1998). Different activation patterns in the visual cortex of late and congenitally blind subjects. Brain, 121: 409–419.Google Scholar
Bushara, K. O., Weeks, R. A., Ishii, K., Catalan, M.-J., Tian, B., Rauschecker, J. P. and Hallett, M. (1999). Modality-specific frontal and parietal areas for auditory and visual spatial localization in humans. Nat. Neurosci., 2: 759–766.Google Scholar
Collignon, O., Vandewalle, G., Voss, P., Albouy, G., Charbonneau, G., Lassonde, M. and Lepore, F. (2011). Functional specialization for auditory-spatial processing in the occipital cortex of congenitally blind humans. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 108: 4435–4440.Google Scholar
De Volder, A. G., Catalan-Ahumada, M., Robert, A., Bol, A., Labar, D., Coppens, A., Michel, C. and Veraart, C. (1999). Changes in occipital cortex activity in early blind humans using a sensory substitution device. Brain Res., 826: 128–134.Google Scholar
Falchier, A., Clavagnier, S., Barone, P. and Kennedy, H. (2002). Anatomical evidence of multimodal integration in primate striate cortex. J. Neurosci., 22: 5749–5759.Google Scholar
Fishman, M. C. and Michael, P. (1973). Integration of auditory information in the cat's visual cortex. Vision Res., 13: 1415–1419.Google Scholar
Innocenti, G. M. and Clarke, S. (1984). Bilateral transitory projection from auditory cortex in kittens. Dev. Brain Res., 14: 143–148.Google Scholar
King, A. J. and Parsons, C. (1999). Improved auditory spatial acuity in visually deprived ferrets. Eur. J. Neurosci., 11: 3945–3956.Google Scholar
King, A. J. and Semple, D. J. (1996). Improvement in auditory spatial acuity following early visual deprivation in ferrets. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 22: 129.4.Google Scholar
Korte, M. and Rauschecker, J. P. (1993). Auditory spatial tuning of cortical neurons is sharpened in cats with early blindness. J. Neurophysiol., 70: 1717–1721.Google Scholar
Kujala, T., Alho, K., Paavilainen, P., Summala, H. and Näätänen, R. (1992). Neural plasticity in processing sound location by the early blind: an event-related potential study. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 84: 469–472.Google Scholar
Kujala, T., Huotilainen, M., Sinkkonen, J., Ahonen, A. I., Alho, K., Hämäläinen, M. S., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Kajola, M., Knuutila, J. E. and Lavikainen, J. (1995). Visual cortex activation in blind humans during sound discrimination. Neurosci. Lett., 183: 143–146.Google Scholar
Lessard, N., Paré, M., Lepore, F. and Lassonde, M. (1998). Early-blind human subjects localize sound sources better than sighted subjects. Nature, 395: 278–280.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. W. and van Essen, D. C. (2000). Corticocortical connections of visual, sensorimotor, and multimodal processing areas in the parietal lobe of the macaque monkey. J. Comp. Neurol., 428: 112–137.Google Scholar
Meredith, M. A. and Clemo, H. R. (1989). Auditory cortical projection from the anterior ectosylvian sulcus (Field AES) to the superior colliculus in the cat: an anatomical and electrophysiological study. J. Comp. Neurol., 289: 687–707.Google Scholar
Mesulam, M. M. (1999). Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., 354: 1325–1346.Google Scholar
Middlebrooks, J. C. and Green, D. M. (1991). Sound localization by human listeners. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 42: 135–159.Google Scholar
Muchnik, C., Efrati, M., Nemeth, E., Malin, M. and Hildesheimer, M. (1991). Central auditory skills in blind and sighted subjects. Scand. Audiol., 20: 19–23.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, A. and Hamilton, R. (2001). The metamodal organization of the brain. Prog. Brain Res., 134: 427–445.Google Scholar
Petitto, L. A., Zatorre, R. J., Gauna, K., Nikelski, E. J., Dostie, D. and Evans, A. C. (2000). Speech-like cerebral activity in profoundly deaf people processing signed languages: implications for the neural basis of human language. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97: 13961–13966.Google Scholar
Poirier, C., Collignon, O., Scheiber, C., Renier, L., Vanlierde, A., Tranduy, D., Veraart, C. and De Volder, A. G. (2006). Auditory motion perception activates visual motion areas in early blind subjects. Neuroimage, 31: 279–285.Google Scholar
Prather, S. C., Votaw, J. R. and Sathian, K. (2004). Task-specific recruitment of dorsal and ventral visual areas during tactile perception. Neuropsychologia, 42: 1079–1087.Google Scholar
Rauschecker, J. P. (1995). Compensatory plasticity and sensory substitution in the cerebral cortex. Trends Neurosci., 18: 36–43.Google Scholar
Rauschecker, J. P. (2002). Auditory reassignment. In Boller, F. and Grafman, J. (eds.), Handbook of Neuropsychology, Plasticity and Rehabilitation, 2nd ed., vol. 9, pp. 167–176. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Rauschecker, J. P. (2006a). Adaptive plasticity and sensory substitution in the cerebral cortex. In Lomber, S. G. and Eggermont, J. J. (eds.), Reprogramming the Cerebral Cortex: Plasticity Following Central and Peripheral Lesion, pp. 361–376. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rauschecker, J. P. (2006b). Plasticity in auditory functions. In Selzer, M., Clarke, S., Cohen, L., Duncan, P., and Gage, F. (eds.) Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation, Vol. 1: Neural Repair and Plasticity, pp. 162–179. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rauschecker, J. P. and Harris, L. R. (1983). Auditory compensation of the effects of visual deprivation in the cat's superior colliculus. Exp. Brain Res., 50, 69–83.Google Scholar
Rauschecker, J. P. and Henning, P. (2001). Crossmodal expansion of cortical maps in early blindness. In Kass, J. (ed.), The Mutable Brain, pp. 243–259, Singapore: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Rauschecker, J. P. and Kniepert, U. (1994). Enhanced precision of auditory localization behavior in visually deprived cats. Eur. J. Neurosci., 6: 149–160.Google Scholar
Rauschecker, J. P. and Korte, M. (1993). Auditory compensation for early blindness in cat cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci., 13: 4538–4548.Google Scholar
Rauschecker, J. P. and Scott, S. (2009). Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: non-human primates illuminate human speech processing. Nat. Neurosci., 12: 718–724.Google Scholar
Rauschecker, J. P. and Tian, B. (2000). Mechanisms and streams for processing of “what” and “where” in auditory cortex. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 97: 11800–11806.Google Scholar
Rauschecker, J. P., Tian, B., Korte, M. and Egert, U. (1992). Crossmodal changes in the somatosensory vibrissa/barrel system of visually deprived animals. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 89: 5063–5067.Google Scholar
Renier, L. A., Anurova, I., De Volder. A. G., Carlson, S., VanMeter, J. and Rauschecker, J. P. (2009). Multi-modal versus modality-specific activation within the “what” and “where” processing streams for sounds and vibro-tactile stimuli. J. Neurosci., 29: 10950–10960.Google Scholar
Renier, L. A., Anurova, I., De Volder. A. G., Carlson, S., VanMeter, J. and Rauschecker, J. P. (2010). Preserved functional specialization for spatial processing in the occipital cortex of the early blind. Neuron, 68: 138–148.Google Scholar
Rice, C. E. (1970). Early blindness, early experience, and perceptual enhancement. Res. Bull. Am. Found. Blind., 22: 1–22.Google Scholar
Rice, C. E., Feinstein, S. H. and Schusterman, R. J. (1965). Echo-detection ability of the blind: size and distance factor. J. Exp. Psychol., 70: 246–251.Google Scholar
Rockland, K. S. and Ojima, H. (2003). Multisensory convergence in calcarine visual areas in macaque monkey. Int. J. Psychophysiol., 50: 19–26.Google Scholar
Röder, B., Teder-Salejarvi, W., Sterr, A., Rosler, F., Hillyard, S. A. and Neville, H. J. (1999). Improved auditory spatial tuning in blind humans. Nature, 400: 162–166.Google Scholar
Romanski, L. M., Tian, B., Fritz, J., Mishkin, M., Goldman-Rakic, P. S. and Rauschecker, J. P. (1999). Dual streams of auditory afferents target multiple domains in the primate prefrontal cortex. Nat. Neurosci., 2: 1131–1136.Google Scholar
Sadato, N., Pascual-Leone, A., Grafman, J., Ibanez, V., Deiber, M.-P., Dold, G. and Hallett, M. (1996). Activation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects. Nature, 380: 526–528.Google Scholar
Smiley, J. F., Hackett, T. A., Ulbert, I., Karmos, G., Lakatos, P., Javitt, D. C. and Schroeder, C. E. (2007). Multisensory convergence in auditory cortex I. Cortical connections of the caudal superior temporal plane in macaque monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol., 502: 894–923.Google Scholar
Spinelli, D. N., Starr, A. and Barrett, T. W. (1968). Auditory specificity in unit recordings from cat's visual cortex. Exp. Neurol., 22: 75–84.Google Scholar
Talairach, J. and Tournoux, P. (1988). A Coplanar Sterotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme Verlag.
Uhl, F., Franzen, P., Podreka, I., Steiner, M. and Deecke, L. (1993). Increased regional cerebral blood flow in inferior occipital cortex and cerebellum of early blind humans. Neurosci. Lett., 150: 162–164.Google Scholar
Van der Loos, H. and Woolsey, T. A. (1973). Somatosensory cortex: structural alterations following early injury to sense organs. Science, 179: 395–398.Google Scholar
Wanet-Defalque, M. C., Veraart, C., De Volder, A., Metz, R., Michel, C., Dooms, G. and Goffinet, A. (1988). High metabolic activity in the visual cortex of early blind human subjects. Brain Res., 446: 369–373.Google Scholar
Weeks, R. A., Aziz-Sultan, A., Bushara, K. O., Tian, B., Wessinger, C. M., Dang, N., Rauschecker, J. P. and Hallett, M. (1999). A PET study of human auditory spatial processing. Neurosci. Lett., 262: 155–158.Google Scholar
Weeks, R. A., Horwitz, B., Aziz-Sultan, A., Tian, B.,Wessinger, C. M., Cohen, L., Hallett, M. and Rauschecker, J. P. (2000). A positron emission tomographic study of auditory localisation in the congenitally blind. J. Neurosci., 20: 2664–2672.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats