Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T11:16:44.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Paradoxes of learning and memory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Henry L. Roediger III
Affiliation:
Washington University
Andrew C. Butler
Affiliation:
Duke University
Narinder Kapur
Affiliation:
University College London
Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School
Vilayanur Ramachandran
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Jonathan Cole
Affiliation:
University of Bournemouth
Sergio Della Sala
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Tom Manly
Affiliation:
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit
Andrew Mayes
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Oliver Sacks
Affiliation:
Columbia University Medical Center
Get access

Summary

Summary

We explore 12 paradoxes of learning, memory and knowing in our chapter. These are mysteries in which subjective experience – what we think we know or remember – does not correspond to objective facts. In some cases, we hold false memories: we are utterly confident in our memories that events happened one way, but they did not. Another example is hindsight bias: we may believe that we knew (after the fact) how an event would turn out, but controlled experiments show people cannot predict the event. Another category of illusion occurs with learning. Often students judge one method of learning to be superior to a second method, but their actual performance shows the reverse to be true. The paradox of interference creates other puzzles: when people try to remember similar events, they will often confuse one for another. We discuss 12 paradoxes and their implications for cognitive functioning. Some of these errors may implicate cognitive strategies that we use because they often lead to correct answers in many situations, but can produce errors in other instances.

Introduction

Psychologists love mysteries and paradoxes. They always have, they always will. There is nothing surprising here; all people like paradoxes and puzzles. Look at Figure 8.1 and ask yourself which surface of the two boxes is longer, the one on the left or the one on the right? Every person naïve to the situation will answer the one on the left. However, the two surfaces are exactly congruent. They are the same.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Paradoxical Brain , pp. 151 - 176
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20: 1063–87.Google ScholarPubMed
Bahrick, H. P., Bahrick, L. E., Bahrick, A. S., & Bahrick, P. E. (1993). Maintenance of foreign language vocabulary and the spacing effect. Psychological Science, 4: 316–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Duchek, J. M., et al. (1999). Veridical and false memories in healthy older adults and in dementia of the Alzheimers type. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16: 361–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bäuml, K. H. (2008). Inhibitory processes. In: Roediger, H. L. (Ed.). Cognitive Psychology of Memory. Oxford: Elsevier, 195–220.Google Scholar
Bjork, R. A. (1975). Retrieval as a memory modifier. In: Solso, S. (Ed.). Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 123–44.Google Scholar
Bjork, R. A. (1994a). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In: Metcalfe, J. & Shimamura, A. (Eds.). Metacognition: Knowing About Knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 185–205.Google Scholar
Bjork, R. A. (1994b). Institutional impediments to effective training. In: Druckman, D. and Bjork, R. A. (Eds.). Learning, Remembering, Believing: Enhancing Human Performance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 295–306.Google Scholar
Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In: Healy, A., Kosslyn, S. & Shiffrin, R. (Eds.). From Learning Processes to Cognitive Processes: Essays in Honor of William K. Estes, Volume. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 35–67.Google Scholar
Bower, G. H., & Reitman, J. S. (1972). Mnemonic elaboration in multilist learning. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behaviour, 11: 478–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. S., & Halliday, H. E. (1991). Crytomnesia and source memory difficulties. American Journal of Psychology, 104: 475–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. S., & Murphy, D. R. (1989). Cryptomnesia: delineating inadvertent plagiarism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15: 432–42.Google Scholar
Callender, A. A., & McDaniel, M. A. (2009). The limited benefits of rereading educational texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34: 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20: 632–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, J. S. (1978). The effect of imagining an event on expectations for the event: an interpretation in terms of the availability heuristic. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14: 88–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castel, A. D., McCabe, D. P., & Roediger, H. L., & Heitman, J. (2007). The dark side of expertise: domain specific memory errors. Psychological Science, 18: 3–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cepeda, N. J., Vul, E., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., & Pashler, H., (2008). Spacing effect in learning: a temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychological Science, 19: 1095–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: a review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132: 354–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christina, R. W., & Bjork, R. A. (1991). Optimizing long-term retention and transfer. In: Druckman, D. & Bjork, R. A. (Eds.). InThe Mind's Eye: Enhancing Human Performance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 23–56.Google Scholar
Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58: 17–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dempster, F. N. (1989). Spacing effects and their implications for theory and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 1: 309–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, D. (2005). Self-insight: Roadblocks and Detours on the Path to Knowing Thyself. New York, NY: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbinghaus, H. (1967). Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology (Ruger, H. A. & Bussenius, C. E., Trans.). New York, NY: Dover. (Original work published 1885.)Google Scholar
Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight is not equal to foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgement under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1: 288–99.Google Scholar
Fischhoff, B., & Beyth, R. (1975). ‘I knew it would happen’: remembered probabilities of once-future things. Organizational Behaviour & Human Performance, 13: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, J. B., & Magdoff, F. (2009). The Great Financial Crisis: Causes and Consequences. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Gallo, D. A. (2006). Associative Illusions of Memory. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Memory & Cognition, 16: 309–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilovich, T. (1991). How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. M. (1976). Monotonic and nonmonotonic lag effects in paired-associate and recognition memory paradigms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, J. A. (1989). The ‘testing’ phenomenon: not gone but nearly forgotten. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81: 392–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goff, L. M., & Roediger, H. L. (1998). Imagination inflation for action events: repeated imaginings lead to illusory recollections. Memory & Cognition, 26: 20–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goode, M. K., Geraci, L., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Superiority of variable to repeated practice in transfer on anagram solution. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15: 662–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., & Dywan, J. (1989). Memory attributions. In: Roediger, H. L. & Craik, F. I. M. (Eds.). Varieties of Memory and Consciousness: Essays in Honour of Endel Tulving. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 391–422.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88: 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114: 3–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Wang, A. Y., & Taylor, T. H. (1979). Fact and fantasy: the roles of accuracy and variability in confusing imaginations with perceptual experiences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5: 229–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93: 1449–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 15: 966–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: do students practice retrieval when they study on their own?Memory, 17: 471–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelley, C. M., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Remembering mistaken as knowing: ease of generation as a basis for confidence in answers to general knowledge questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, R., & Booth, B. (1978). Specific and varied practice of a motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46: 395–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2007). The promise and perils of self-regulated study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14: 219–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhl, B. A., Dudukovic, N. M., Kahn, I., & Wagner, A. D. (2007). Decreased demands on cognitive control reveal the neural processing benefits of forgetting. Nature Neuroscience, 10: 908–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loftus, E., Miller, D., & Burns, H. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4: 19–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automation destruction: an example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13: 585–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magill, R. A., & Hall, K. G. (1990). A review of the contextual inference effect in motor skill acquisition. Human Movement Science, 9: 241–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, R. L., & Bower, G. H. (1993). Eliciting cryptomnesia: unconscious plagiarism in a puzzle task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19: 673–88.Google Scholar
Marsh, R. L., Landau, J. D., & Hicks, J. L. (1997). Contributions of inadequate source monitoring to unconscious plagiarism during idea generation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23: 886–97.Google Scholar
Mawhinney, V. T., Bostow, D. E., Laws, D. R., Blumenfeld, G. J., & Hopkins, B. L. (1971). A comparison of students studying-behavior produced by daily, weekly, and three-week testing schedules. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4: 257–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCabe, D. P., Smith, A. D., & Parks, C. M. (2007). Inadvertent plagiarism in young and older adults: the role of working memory capacity in reducing memory errors. Memory & Cognition, 35: 231–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarland, C., & Ross, M. (1987). The relation between current impressions and memories of self and dating partners. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12: 228–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meade, M. L., & Roediger, H. L. (2002). Explorations in the social contagion of memory. Memory & Cognition, 30: 995–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melton, A. W. (1970). The situation with respect to the spacing of repetitions and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9: 596–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, J. (1991). A behavioral perspective on college teaching. The Behavior Analyst, 14: 229–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mobbs, D., Hassabis, D., Seymour, B., et al. (2009). Choking on the money: reward-based performance decrements are associated with midbrain activity. Psychological Science, 20: 955–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newell, A. (1973). You can't play 20 questions with nature and win: projective comments on the papers of this symposium. In: Chase, W. G. (Ed.). Visual Information Processing. New York, NY: Academic Press, 283–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, L. (1990). Overcofidence in the communication of intent: heard and unheard melodies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84: 231–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheimer, D. M. (2006). Consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity: problems with using long words needlessly. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20: 139–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfect, T. J., & Stark, L. (2008). Why do I always have the best ideas? The role of idea quality in unconscious plagiarism. Memory, 16: 386–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piaget, J. (1962). Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Pohl, R. F. (2004). Cognitive Illusions: A Handbook on Fallacies and Biases in Thinking, Judgement and Memory. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Preston, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2007). The eureka error: inadvertent plagiarism by misattributions of effort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92: 575–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: two means of access to the personal past. Memory & Cognition, 21: 89–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roediger, H. L. (1974). Inhibiting effects of recall. Memory & Cognition, 2: 261–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roediger, H. L. (1978). Recall as a self-limiting process. Memory & Cognition, 6: 54–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roediger, H. L. (1980). Memory metaphors in cognitive psychology. Memory & Cognition, 8: 231–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roediger, H. L. (1990). Implicit memory: retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45: 1043–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006a). The power of testing memory: basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1: 181–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006b). Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17: 249–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: remembering words that were not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21: 803–14.Google Scholar
Roediger, H. L., Balota, D. A., & Watson, J. M. (2001a). Spreading activation and the arousal of false memories. In: Roediger, H. L., Nairne, J. S., Neath, I. & Surprenant, A. M. (Eds.). The Nature of Remembering: Essays in Honor of Robert G. Crowder. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association Press, 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roediger, H. L., Jacoby, D., & McDermott, K. B. (1996). Misinformation effects in recall: creating false memories through repeated retrieval. Journal of Memory and Language, 35: 300–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roediger, H. L., Meade, M. L., & Bergman, E. (2001b). Social contagion of memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8: 365–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, M. (1989). Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychological Review, 96: 341–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, M., & Wilson, A. E. (2002). It feels like yesterday: self-esteem, valence of personal past experiences, and judgments of subjective distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82: 792–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, M., & Wilson, A. E. (2003). Autobiographical memory and conceptions of self: getting better all the time. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12: 66–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundus, D. (1973). Negative effects of using list items as recall cues. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12: 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3: 207–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61: 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, D. C., & Schmidt, R. A. (1982). The schema theory: recent evidence and developmental implications. In: Kelso, J. A. S. & Clark, J. E. (Eds.). The Development of Movement Control and Co-ordination. New York, NY: Wiley, 113–50.Google Scholar
Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5: 179–87.Google Scholar
Shepard, R. N. (1981). Psychological complementarity. In: Kubovy, M. & Pomerantz, J. R. (Eds.). Perceptual Organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 279–342.Google Scholar
Slamecka, N. J. (1968). An examination of trace storage in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76: 504–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starfield, B. (2000). Is US health really the best in the world?Journal of the American Medical Association, 284: 483–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, A. K., Bulevich, J. B., & Loftus, E. F. (2003). Exploring the role of repetition and sensory elaboration in the imagination inflation effect. Memory & Cognition, 31: 630–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trepel, C., Fox, C. R., & Poldrack, R. A. (2005). Prospect theory on the brain: toward a cognitive neuroscience of decision under risk. Cognitive Brain Research, 23: 34–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychologist, 26: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulving, E., & Arbuckle, T. Y. (1963). Sources of intratrial interference in paired-associate learning. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1: 321–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5: 207–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgments under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185: 1124–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Underwood, B. J. (1961). Ten years of massed practice on distributed practice. Psychological Review, 68: 229–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A. E., & Ross, M. (2001). From chump to champ: people's appraisals of their earlier and current selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80: 572–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, T. D. (2002). Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, G. (1978). The knew-it-all-along effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4: 345–53.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×