Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T04:47:24.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - In the Practice Agencement

Rhythms, Refrains and Feminist Snaps

from Part I - The Politics of Time: Ontologies and Metaphysics of Organization as Time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2023

By
Silvia Gherardi
Edited by
François-Xavier de Vaujany ,
Robin Holt  and
Albane Grandazzi
François-Xavier de Vaujany
Affiliation:
Universite Paris Dauphine-PSL
Robin Holt
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business School
Albane Grandazzi
Affiliation:
Grenoble Ecole de Management
Get access

Summary

The chapter assumes a feminist new materialist approach to explore the entanglement of temporality, materiality and power within a practice agencement. Feminist new materialism in empirical research is a methodology that emphasizes the vitality of matter and the performative and affective flow of agency. The chapter deals both with the materiality of human bodies (and normative embodiment in organizations) and with the materiality of digital technologies and their normative power over teens’ sexuality. Temporality is explored by means of two concepts – refrain and feminist snap – that create orientations for thinking about how the entangled elements that form a practice assume in time different configurations according to the elements’ capacity to affect and be affected. While refrain illuminates the lines of flight within differentiating practices, feminist snap highlights the breaking moment of discontinuity when digital networking subverts the control on women’s bodies.

Keywords

agency as flowdigital activismfeminist new materialismpractice as agencementrefrain
Type
Chapter
Information
Organization as Time
Technology, Power and Politics
 , pp. 61 - 82
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, S. (2017a). Snap! In Feministkilljoys. Available at: https://feministkilljoys.com/2017/05/21/snap/.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S. (2017b). Living a Feminist Life. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Alaimo, S. (2008). Trans-corporeal feminisms and the ethical space of nature. In Alaimo, S. and Hekman, S. (eds), Material Feminisms (pp. 237–64). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Antonakaki, M., French, J. E. & Guner, C. (2018). Realising Sara Ahmed’s ‘feminist snap’: Voices, embodiment, affectivity. Ephemera, 18(4), 923–54.Google Scholar
Bachani, J. (2021). Poetry for organizing. Organizational Aesthetics, 10(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Basner, K., Christensen, J. F., French, J. E. & Schreven, S. (2018). Snaptivism: A collective biography of feminist snap as affective activism. Ephemera, 18(4), 901–22.Google Scholar
Baxter, L. F. (2021). The importance of vibrant materialities in transforming affective dissonance into affective solidarity: How the Countess Ablaze Organized the Tits Out Collective. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(3), 898–916.Google Scholar
Bertelsen, L. & Murphie, A. (2010). An Ethics of Everyday Infinities and Powers: Félix Guattari on Affect and Refrain. In Gregg, M. & Seigworth, G. J. (eds), The Affect Theory Reader (pp. 138–61). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Blithe, S. J. (2019). “I always knew I was a little girly”: The gendering of skills in management training. Management Learning, 50(5), 517–33.Google Scholar
Blockmans, I. G., De Schauwer, E., Van Hove, G. & Enzlin, P. (2020). Retouching and revisiting the strangers within: An exploration journey on the waves of meaning and matter in dance. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(7), 733–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blue, S. (2019). Institutional rhythms: Combining practice theory and rhythmanalysis to conceptualise processes of institutionalisation. Time & Society, 28(3), 922–50.Google Scholar
Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Braidotti, R. (2019). A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(6), 31–61.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2011). Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charteris, J. & Jones, M. (2020). Replete Sensations of the Refrain: Sound, Action and Materiality in Agentic Posthuman Assemblages. In Thomas, M. & Bellingham, R. (eds), Post-Qualitative Research and Innovative Methodologies (pp. 187–202). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Chia, R. & Holt, R. (2006). Strategy as practical coping: A Heideggerian perspective. Organization Studies, 27(5), 635–55.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. J. (1996). Theories of action and praxis. In Turner, B. S. (ed), The Blackwell Companion to Social Theory (pp. 111–42). Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Coleman, R., Page, T. & Palmer, H. (2019). Feminist new materialist practice: The mattering of methods. MAI Feminism and Visual Culture, Spring(3).Google Scholar
Cozza, M. & Gherardi, S. (forthcoming). Posthuman Feminism and Feminist New Materialism: Towards an Ethico-onto-epistemology in Research Practices. In Katila, S., Bell, E. & Meriläinen, S. (eds), Handbook of Feminist Methodologies in Management and Organization Studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Dall’Alba, G., Sandberg, J. & Sidhu, R. K. (2018). Embodying skilful performance: Co-constituting body and world in biotechnology. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(3), 270–86.Google Scholar
De Vaujany, F-X., Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A., Munro, I., Nama, Y. & Holt, R. (2021). Control and surveillance in work practice: Cultivating paradox in “new” modes of organizing. Organization Studies, 42(5), 675–95.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. B. Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. ([1991]1994). What Is Philosophy? Trans. H. Tomlinson & G. Burchell. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. & Parnet, C. (1988). L’Abécédaire de Gilles Deleuze [The ABCs of Gilles Deleuze]. Produced and directed by P-A. Boutang. France: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Gane, N. (2009). Concepts and the ‘new’ empiricism. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1), 83–97.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gatrell, C. (2011). Managing the maternal body: A comprehensive review and transdisciplinary analysis. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(1), 97–112.Google Scholar
Gatrell, C. (2013). Maternal body work: How women managers and professionals negotiate pregnancy and new motherhood at work. Human Relations, 66(5), 621–44.Google Scholar
Gatrell, C. (2019). Boundary creatures? Employed, breastfeeding mothers and “abjection as practice”. Organization Studies, 40(3), 421–42.Google Scholar
Gherardi, S. (1995a). Gender, Symbolism and Organizational Cultures. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gherardi, S. (1995b). When will he say: “Today the plates are soft”? Management of ambiguity and situated decision-making. Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies, 1(1), 9–27.Google Scholar
Gherardi, S. (2016). To start practice-theorizing anew: The contribution of the concepts of agencement and formativeness. Organization, 23(5), 680–98.Google Scholar
Gherardi, S. (2019). How to Conduct a Practice-based Study: Problems and Methods, (2nd ed.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Gherardi, S. & Strati, A. (1988). The temporal dimension in organizational studies. Organization Studies, 9(2), 149–64.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hernes, T. (2022). Organization and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hickey-Moody, A. (2015). Manifesto: The Rhizomatics of Practice as Research. In Hickey-Moody, A. & Page, T. (eds), Arts, Pedagogy and Cultural Resistance: New Materialism (pp. 169–92). London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hickey-Moody, A. C. (2020). New materialism, ethnography, and socially engaged practice: Space-time folds and the agency of matter. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(7), 724–32.Google Scholar
Hinton, P. & Treusch, P. (eds) (2015). Teaching with Feminist Materialisms. Utrecht: ATgender, The European Association for Gender Research, Education and Documentation.Google Scholar
Holt, R. & Sandberg, J. (2011). Phenomenology and organization theory. In Lounsbury, M. (ed), Philosophy and Organization Theory. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Höpfl, H. & Kostera, M. (eds.) (2003). Interpreting the Maternal Organization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hopwood, N. (2014). The Fabric of Practices: Times, Spaces, Bodies, Things. In McLean, L., Stafford, L. & Weeks, M., Exploring Bodies in Time and Space (pp. 137–46). Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press.Google Scholar
Hultin, L. (2019). On becoming a sociomaterial researcher: Exploring epistemological practices grounded in a relational, performative ontology. Information and Organization, 29(2), 91–104.Google Scholar
Huopalainen, A. & Satama, S. (2020). Writing birthing bodies: Exploring the entanglements between flesh and materiality in childbirth. Culture and Organization, 26(4), 333–54.Google Scholar
Jackson, A. Y. (2016). An ontology of a backflip. Cultural Studies Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 183–92.Google Scholar
Janssens, M. & Steyaert, C. (2020). The site of diversalizing: The accomplishment of inclusion in intergenerational dance. Journal of Management Studies, 57(6), 1143–73.Google Scholar
Katila, S. (2019). The mothers in me. Management Learning, 50(1), 129–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, J., Mendes, K. & Ringrose, J. (2018). Speaking “unspeakable things”: Documenting digital feminist responses to rape culture. Journal of Gender Studies, 27(1), 22–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kember, S. & Zylinska, J. (2012). Life after New Media: Mediation as a Vital Process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. (1984). Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lenz Taguchi, H. & St. Pierre, E. (2017). Using concepts as method in educational and social science inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 643–8.Google Scholar
López, D. T. (2019). The Society of the Digital Swarm: Microblogging and Construction of Subjectivity in Homo Digitalis. In González-Prida Diaz, V. & Zamora Bonilla, J. P. Handbook of Research on Industrial Advancement in Scientific Knowledge (pp. 95–110). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
MacLure, M. (2013). Classification or wonder? Coding as an analytic practice in qualitative research. In Coleman, B. & Ringrose, J. (eds), Deleuze and Research Methodologies (pp. 164–83). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Massumi, B. (1987). Translator’s Foreword: Pleasures of Philosophy. In Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (eds), A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
McCormack, D. (2013). Refrains for Moving Bodies. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mendes, K. & Ringrose, J. (2019). Digital feminist activism: # MeToo and the everyday experiences of challenging rape culture. In Fileborn, B. & Loney-Howes, R. (eds), # MeToo and the Politics of Social Change (pp.37–51). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mendes, K., Ringrose, J. & Keller, J. (2019). Digital Feminist Activism: Girls and Women Fight Back Against Rape Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Z. (2016). Affective publics and structures of storytelling: Sentiment, events and mediality. Information, Communication & Society, 19(3), 307–24.Google Scholar
Pink, S. (2001). Doing Visual Ethnography. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Poggio, B. (2003). Who’s Afraid of Mothers? In Höpfl, H. & Kostera, M. (eds), Interpreting the Maternal Organizations (pp. 13–26). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Priola, V., Lasio, D., Serri, F. & De Simone, S. (2018). The organisation of sexuality and the sexuality of organisation: A genealogical analysis of sexual ‘inclusive exclusion’ at work. Organization, 25(6), 732–54.Google Scholar
Rinaldi, C. (2020). Homophobic Conduct as Normative Masculinity Test: Victimization, Male Hierarchies, and Heterosexualizing Violence in Hate Crimes. In Balloni, A. & Sette, R. (eds), Handbook of Research on Trends and Issues in Crime Prevention, Rehabilitation, and Victim Support (pp. 100–23). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R. & Livingstone, S. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and “sexting”: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory, 14(3), 305–23.Google Scholar
Ringrose, J. & Mendes, K. (2018). Mediated Affect and Feminist Solidarity: Teens Using Twitter to Challenge “Rape Culture” In and Around School. In Sampson, T., Maddison, S. & Darren, D. (eds), Affect and Social Media: Emotion, Mediation, Anxiety and Contagion. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
Ringrose, J. & Renold, E. (2014). “F**k rape!” Exploring affective intensities in a feminist research assemblage. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 772–80.Google Scholar
Ringrose, J., Warfield, K. & Zarabadi, S. (eds) (2019). Feminist Posthumanisms, New Materialisms and Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Satama, S. (2016). “Feathers on Fire”: A study of the interplay between passion and vulnerability in dance. Organizational Aesthetics, 5(1), 64–93.Google Scholar
Satama, S., Blomberg, A. & Warren, S. (2022). Exploring the embodied subtleties of collaborative creativity: What organisations can learn from dance. Management Learning, 53(2), 167–89.Google Scholar
Sauzet, S. (2015). Thinking through Picturing. In Hinton, P. and Treusch, P. (eds), Teaching with Feminist Materialisms (pp. 37–51). Utrecht: AtGender, The European Association for Gender Research, Education and Documentation.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. (2006). The Time of Activity. Continental Philosophy Review, 39(2), 155–82.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. (2010). The Timespace of Human Activity: On Performance, Society, and History as Indeterminate Teleological Events. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Shove, E. (2009). Everyday Practice and the Production and Consumption of Time. In Shove, E., Trentmann, F. & Wilk, R. (eds), Time, Consumption and Everyday Life: Practice, Materiality and Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Springgay, S. & Zaliwska, Z. (2017). Learning to be affected: Matters of pedagogy in the artists’ soup kitchen. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(3), 273–83.Google Scholar
Stengers, I. (2008). Experimenting with refrains: Subjectivity and the challenge of escaping modern dualism. Subjectivity, 22(1), 38–59.Google Scholar
Strati, A. (2019). Organizational Theory and Aesthetic Philosophies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Amsterdam, N. & van Eck, D. (2019a). “I have to go the extra mile.” How fat female employees manage their stigmatized identity at work. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 35(1), 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Amsterdam, N. & van Eck, D. (2019b). In the flesh: A poetic inquiry into how fat female employees manage weight-related stigma. Culture and Organization, 25(4), 300–16.Google Scholar
van Amsterdam, N., van Eck, D. & Meldgaard Kjær, K. (2022). On (not) fitting in. Fat embodiment, affect and organizational materials as differentiating agents. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221074162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Eck, D. V. & van Amsterdam, N. V. (2021). Affective engagement with airport security work: Wor(l)ding material agencies through poetry. Organizational Aesthetics, 10(1), 36–41.Google Scholar
Warfield, K. & Demone, C. (2018). Writing the Body of the Paper: Three New Materialist Methods for Examining the Socially Mediated Body. In Papacharissi, Z, (ed), A Networked Self and Human Augmentics, Artificial Intelligence, Sentience (pp. 133–52). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Warren, S. (2002). “Show me how it feels to work here”: Using photography to research organizational aesthetics. Ephemera 2(3), 224–45.Google Scholar
Wehrle, M. (2016). Normative embodiment. The role of the body in Foucault’s genealogy. A phenomenological re-reading. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 47(1), 56–71.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×