Next Generation Technology-Enhanced Assessment Global Perspectives on Occupational and Workplace Testing
Book contents
- Next Generation Technology-Enhanced Assessment
- Next Generation Technology-Enhanced Assessment
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Series Editor’s Foreword
- Preface
- Part I Common Assessment Methods Deployed with Internet Technology
- Chapter 1 Employment Testing
- Chapter 2 Licensing and Certification
- Part II Technical Foundations for Internet-Based Assessment Delivery
- Part III Advances, Trends, and Issues
- Part IV Guidelines for Practice and Future Directions
- Index
- References
Chapter 2 - Licensing and Certification
from Part I - Common Assessment Methods Deployed with Internet Technology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 December 2017
Book contents
- Next Generation Technology-Enhanced Assessment
- Next Generation Technology-Enhanced Assessment
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Series Editor’s Foreword
- Preface
- Part I Common Assessment Methods Deployed with Internet Technology
- Chapter 1 Employment Testing
- Chapter 2 Licensing and Certification
- Part II Technical Foundations for Internet-Based Assessment Delivery
- Part III Advances, Trends, and Issues
- Part IV Guidelines for Practice and Future Directions
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Next Generation Technology-Enhanced AssessmentGlobal Perspectives on Occupational and Workplace Testing, pp. 36 - 68Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AERA.Google Scholar
Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Pub. L. 101–336. 26 July 1990. 104 Stat. 328.Google Scholar
Baker, & McKenzie, (2006). Worldwide guide to termination, employment discrimination, and workplace harassment laws. Ithaca, NY: Cornell ILR School Digital Commons.Google Scholar
Bennett, R. E., & Zhang, M. (2016). Validity and automated scoring. In Drasgow, F. (Ed.), Technology and testing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co.Google Scholar
Cizek, G. J. (Ed.). (2001). Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods and perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Davey, T., & Nering, M. (2002). Controlling item exposure and maintaining item security. In Mills, C. N., Potenza, M. T., Fremer, J. J., & Ward, W. C. (Eds.), Computer-based testing: Building the foundations for future assessments (pp. 165–191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Feinberg, R. A., Raymond, M. R., & Haist, S. A. (2015). Repeat testing effects on credentialing exams: Are repeaters misinformed or uninformed? Educational Measurement Issues and Practice, 34(1), 34–39.Google Scholar
Foster, D., & Miller, H. L., Jr. (2009). A new format for multiple-choice testing: Discrete-Option Multiple-Choice. Results from early studies. Psychology Science Quarterly, 51(4), 355–369.Google Scholar
Foster, D. F., & Zervos, C. (2006). The big Internet heist. Poster presented at the Association of Test Publishers annual conference, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
Gibson, W. M., & Weiner, J. A. (1998). Generating random parallel test forms using CTT in a computer-based environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 25, 4.Google Scholar
Gierl, M., & Lai, H. (2013). Educational measurement: Issues and practice: Instructional topics in educational measurement (ITEMS). Module: Using automated processes to generate test items.Google Scholar
Gulino v. The Board of Education of the City of New York and the New York State Education.Google Scholar
The International Standards Organization (ISO) (2012). International Standard ISO/IEC Standard 17024:2012 ISO.Google Scholar
Krogue, K. (2012, September 18). 5 gamification rules from the grandfather of gamification. Forbes.Google Scholar
Lord, F., & Novick, M. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Mehrens, W. A. (1995). Licensure testing: Purposes, procedures, and practices. Paper 6.Google Scholar
Moore, G. (circa 1970). Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore%27s_law (accessed May 21, 2016).Google Scholar
National Commission for Certifying Agencies (2016). Standards for the accreditation of certification programs. Washington DC: Institute for Credentialling Excellence.Google Scholar
Peng, C. J., & Subkoviak, M. J. (1980). A note on Huynh’s normal approximation procedure for estimating criterion-referenced reliability. Journal of Educational Measurement, 17(4), 359–368.Google Scholar
Segall, D. O., & Moreno, K. E. (1999). Development of the computerized adaptive testing version of the Armed Services Vocational Batter. In Drasgow, F. & Olson-Buchanan, J. B. (Eds.), Innovations in cauterized assessments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sergeant, (2012). Verification and validation of simulation models. Journal of Simulation, 7, 12–14.Google Scholar
Shapiro, J. (2015). How a law to protect disabled Americans became imitated around the world. Retrieved from www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2015/07/24/425607389/how-a-law-to-protect-disabled-americans-became-imitated-around-the-world.Google Scholar
US Copyright Office, Library of Congress (2000). Copyright basics. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
US Copyright Office, Library of Congress (2015). Circular 38a.0915. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Department of Labor, Department of Justice, & Civil Service Commission (1978). Section 60–3, Uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. 43 FR 38295.Google Scholar
Weller, J., Henderson, R., Webster, C., Shulruf, B., Torrie, J., Davies, E., Frampton, C., & Merry, A. (2014). Building the evidence on simulation validity: Comparison of anesthesiologists’ communication patterns in real and simulated cases. Anesthesiology, 120, 1.Google Scholar
Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2015). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Wharton Digital Press.Google Scholar