Bibliography

Abbott, E. A. Johannine Grammar (London: A&C Black, 1906).Google Scholar

Adam, A. K. M. Making Sense of New Testament Theology: “Modern” Problems and Prospects (Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Adam, A. K. M., Fowl, Stephen E., Vanhoozer, Kevin J., and Watson, Francis. Reading Scripture with the Church: Toward a Hermeneutic for Theological Interpretation (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2006).Google Scholar

Adams, Edward. Constructing the World: A Study in Paul’s Cosmological Language (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 2000).Google Scholar

Adams, Sean A. “James Barr and Theological Lexicography,” in Pillars in the History of Biblical Interpretation, 2 vols., eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Adams, Sean A., MBSS 2 (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2016), 2:319–36.Google Scholar

Akmajian, Adrian, Demers, Richard A., Farmer, Ann K., and Harnish, Robert M.. Linguistics: An Introduction to Language and Communication, 5th ed. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Alhindi, Yousif. “Ferdinand de Saussure,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 241–48.Google Scholar

Allan, Keith. The Western Classical Tradition in Linguistics, 2nd ed. (London: Equinox, 2010).Google Scholar

Allison, Dale C. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle of James, ICC (New York: Bloomsbury, 2013).Google Scholar

Andreski, Stanislav, ed. Herbert Spencer: Structure, Function and Evolution (London: Michael Joseph, 1971).Google Scholar

Andrews, Edna. Markedness Theory: The Union of Asymmetry and Semiosis in Language (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Ashcraft, Morris. Rudolf Bultmann, MMTM (Waco, TX: Word, 1972).Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words, 2nd ed., eds. Urmson, J. O. and Sbisà, Marina (Oxford: Clarendon, 1962).Google Scholar

Baird, William. History of New Testament Research, 3 vols. (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1992–2013).Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. Holquist, Michael, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, trans. Caryl Emerson (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. Rabelais and His World, trans. Helene Iswolsky (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1965).Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, trans. Vern W. McGee, eds. Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Baldwin, Jennifer A. “Franz Boas,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 41–42.Google Scholar

Balla, Peter. Challenges to New Testament Theology, WUNT 2/95 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1997; repr., Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1997).Google Scholar

Banks, David. A Systemic Functional Grammar of English: A Simple Introduction (London: Routledge, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bann, S., and Bowlt, J. E., eds. Russian Formalism: A Collection of Articles and Texts in Translation (Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1973).Google Scholar

Bar-Tal, Daniel. Group Beliefs: A Conception for Analyzing Group Structure, Processes, and Behavior (New York: Springer, 1990).Google Scholar

Barclay, John M. G. Paul and the Gift (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2015).Google Scholar

Barker, Joel. “Brevard S. Childs and the Canonical Approach,” in Pillars in the History of Biblical Interpretation, 2 vols., eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Adams, Sean A., MBSS 2 (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2016), 2:359–79.Google Scholar

Barr, James. “’Abbā isn’t ‘Daddy,’” JTS 39 (1988) 28–47.Google Scholar

Barr, James. The Bible in the Modern World (London: SCM Press, 1973).Google Scholar

Barr, James. “Biblical Theology,” in The Encyclopedia of Christianity, trans. Geoffrey W. Bromiley, 5 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans; Leiden: Brill, 1999–2008), 1:246–51, English translation of “Biblische Theologie,” in Evangelisches Kirchenlexikon, eds. Fahlbusch, Erwin et al., 5 vols. (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1986–1997), 1: cols. 488–94.Google Scholar

Barr, James. “Biblical Theology,” in The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, supplementary vol., ed. Crim, Keith (Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1962), 104–109.Google Scholar

Barr, James. Biblical Words for Time, rev. ed., SBT 33 (London: SCM Press, 1969 [1962]).Google Scholar

Barr, James. The Concept of Biblical Theology (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1999).Google Scholar

Barr, James. Old and New in Interpretation: A Study of the Two Testaments (London: SCM Press, 1966).Google Scholar

Barr, James. “Revelation in History,” in The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, supplementary vol., ed. Crim, Keith (Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1962), 746–49.Google Scholar

Barr, James. “Revelation Through History in the Old Testament and in Modern Theology,” PSB 56 (1963) 4–14 (also published in Int 17 [1963] 193–205).Google Scholar

Barr, James. The Semantics of Biblical Language (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961).Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. The Epistle to the Romans, trans. Edwin C. Hoskyns (London: Oxford University Press, 1933).Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. “The Death of the Author,” in Image–Music–Text, trans. S. Heath (New York: Hill and Wang, 1977), 42–48.Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. Image–Music–Text, trans. S. Heath (New York: Hill and Wang, 1977).Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. The Pleasure of the Text, trans. Richard Miller (New York: Hill and Wang, 1975).Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. The Semiotic Challenge, trans. Richard Howard (New York: Hill and Wang, 1988).Google Scholar

Bartholomew, Craig G. “Biblical Theology,” in Dictionary for Theological Interpretation of the Bible, ed. Vanhoozer, Kevin J. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2005), 84–90.Google Scholar

Bartholomew, Craig G. Introducing Biblical Hermeneutics: A Comprehensive Framework for Hearing God in Scripture (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2015).Google Scholar

Bateman, John A. “The Place of Systemic Functional Linguistics as a Linguistic Theory in the Twenty-First Century,” in The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, eds. Bartlett, Tom and O’Grady, Gerard (London: Routledge, 2017), 11–26.Google Scholar

Bates, Matthew. “The External-Relational Shift in Faith (Pistis) in New Testament Research: Romans 1 as Gospel-Allegiance Test Case,” CBR 18 (2020) 176–202.Google Scholar

Battistella, Edwin L. Markedness: The Evaluative Superstructure of Language (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard. Jesus and the God of Israel: God Crucified and Other Studies on the New Testament’s Christology of Divine Identity (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2008).Google Scholar

Bauer, Georg Lorenz. Biblische Theologie des Neuen Testaments, 4 vols. (Leipzig: Weygand, 1800–1802).Google Scholar

Bauer, Walter. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and other Early Christian Literature, 3rd ed., rev. and ed. Danker, Frederick William (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Baumgarten-Crusius, Ludwig F. O. Grundzüge der Biblischen Theologie (Jena: Friedrich Frommann, 1828).Google Scholar

Baur, Ferdinand Christian. Paul the Apostle of Jesus Christ: His Life and Works, His Epistles and Teachings, 2 vols. (London: Williams & Norgate, 1873–1875; repr. in single vol., Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2003).Google Scholar

Baur, Ferdinand Christian. Vorlesungen über Neutestamentliche Theologie, ed. Baur, F. F. (Leipzig: Fues, 1864).Google Scholar

Bazell, Charles E. Linguistic Form (Istanbul: Istanbul Press, 1953).Google Scholar

Beale, G. K. A New Testament Biblical Theology: The Unfolding of the Old Testament in the New (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2011).Google Scholar

Beaugrande, Robert de. Linguistic Theory: The Discourse of Fundamental Works (London: Longman, 1991).Google Scholar

Bebbington, D. W. Patterns in History: A Christian View (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1979).Google Scholar

Beekes, Robert S. P. Comparative Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, Allan. The Guidebook to Sociolinguistics (Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2014).Google Scholar

Bell, Allan. “Language Style as Audience Design,” Language in Society 13 (1983) 145–202.Google Scholar

Benveniste, Émile. Problèmes de linguistique générale, 2 vols. (Paris: Gallimard, 1966–1974), English translation Problems in General Linguistics, vol. 1, trans. Mary Elizabeth Meek (Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press, 1971).Google Scholar

Berding, Kenneth, and Lunde, Jonathan, eds. Three Views on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2007).Google Scholar

Berger, Peter L. The Heretical Imperative: Contemporary Possibilities of Religious Affirmation (London: Collins, 1980).Google Scholar

Berger, Peter L., and Luckmann, Thomas. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1967).Google Scholar

Berry, Margaret. Introduction to Systemic Linguistics, 2 vols. (London: Batsford, 1975–1977).Google Scholar

Beyschlag, Willibald. New Testament Theology, 2 vols., trans. Neil Buchanan (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1895).Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. “Representativeness in Corpus Design,” Literary and Linguistic Computing 8 (1993) 243–57.Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, and Susan, Conrad. Register, Genre, and Style, CTL (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Billings, J. Todd. The Word of God for the People of God: An Entryway to the Theological Interpretation of Scripture (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2010).Google Scholar

Black, David Alan. It’s Still Greek to Me: An Easy-to-Understand Guide to Intermediate Greek (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1998).Google Scholar

Black, David Alan. Learn to Read New Testament Greek (Nashville, TN: Broadman, 1993).Google Scholar

Black, David Alan. Linguistics for Students of New Testament Greek: A Survey of Basic Concepts and Applications (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1988; 2nd ed., 1995).Google Scholar

Black, Stephanie L. Sentence Conjunctions in the Gospel of Matthew: καί, δέ, τότε, γάρ, οὖν and Asyndeton in Narrative Discourse, JSNTSup 216, SNTG 9 (London: Sheffield Academic, 2002).Google Scholar

Blakemore, Diane. Understanding Utterances: An Introduction to Pragmatics (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).Google Scholar

Blass, Friedrich. Grammar of New Testament Greek, trans. Henry St. John Thackeray (London: Macmillan, 1898).Google Scholar

Blass, Friedrich. Grammatik des Neutestamentlichen Griechisch (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1896).Google Scholar

Blass, Friedrich, and Debrunner, Albert. A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, trans. Robert W. Funk (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961).Google Scholar

Blomberg, Craig L. A New Testament Theology (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Bloom, Harold. The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry (London: Oxford University Press, 1973).Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Leonard. Language (New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston, 1933).Google Scholar

Boas, Franz. “Introduction,” in Handbook of American Indian Languages, 3 vols. (Washington, DC: American Print Office, 1911–1938), 1:1–83.Google Scholar

Boas, Franz. Race, Language, and Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1940).Google Scholar

Bock, Darrell L., and Charlesworth, James H., eds. The Parables of Enoch: A Paradigm Shift (London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2013).Google Scholar

Boman, Thorleif. Hebrew Thought Compared with Greek, trans. Jules L. Moreau (London: SCM Press, 1960 [1954]).Google Scholar

Bonsirven, Joseph. Théologie du Nouveau Testament (Paris: Aubier, 1951).Google Scholar

Bopp, Franz. A Comparative Grammar of the Sanscrit, Zend, Greek, Latin, Lithuanian, Gothic, German, and Sclavonic Languages, trans. Lieutenant Eastwick, ed. Wilson, H. H., 3 parts in 2 vols. (London: James Madden, 1845–1850; repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1985).Google Scholar

Bopp, Franz. Über das Conjugationssystem der Sanskritsprache in Vergleichung mit jenem der griechischen, lateinischen, persischen und germanischen Sprache, ed. Windischmann, R. J. (Frankfurt am Main: Andreäischen, 1816; repr., London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Bormann, Lukas. “Das Theologische Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament im 21. Jahrhundert: Überlegungen zu seiner Geschichte und heutigen Benutzung,” in Theologisches Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament, 9 vols., eds. Kittel, Gerhard and Friedrich, Gerhard (repr., Darmstadt: Academic, 2019), 1:v–xxii.Google Scholar

Bornkamm, Günther. “The Stilling of the Storm in Matthew” (1948), inTradition and Interpretation in Matthew, by Bornkamm, Günther, Barth, Gerhard, and Held, Heinz Joachim, trans. Scott, Percy (London: SCM Press, 1963), 52–57.Google Scholar

Borsch, Frederick Houk. The Christian and Gnostic Son of Man, SBT Second Series 14 (London: SCM Press, 1970).Google Scholar

Borsch, Frederick Houk. The Son of Man in Myth and History, NTL (London: SCM Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Botha, Rudolf P. Challenging Chomsky: The Generative Garden Game (Oxford: Blackwell, 1989).Google Scholar

Bouquet, Simon, and Engler, Rudolf. “Preface,” in Writings in General Linguistics, by de Saussure, Ferdinand (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), xi–xvi.Google Scholar

Bousset, Wilhelm. Kyrios Christos: Geschichte des Christusglaubens von den anfängen des Christentums bis Irenaeus (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1913), English translation Kyrios Christos: A History of the Belief in Christ from the Beginnings of Christianity to Irenaeus, trans. John E. Steely (Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1970).Google Scholar

Brant, Jo-Ann A. Dialogue and Drama: Elements of Greek Tragedy in John’s Gospel (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2004).Google Scholar

Branton, James. “Our Present Situation in Biblical Theology,” Religion in Life 26 (1956–1957) 5–18.Google Scholar

Breytenbach, Cilliers. Versöhnung: Eine Studie zur paulinischen Soteriologie, WMANT 60 (Neukirchen: Neukirchener, 1989).Google Scholar

Brooks, Cleanth. The Well-Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1947).Google Scholar

Brooks, James A., and Winbery, Carlton L.. Syntax of New Testament Greek (Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1979; repub., 1988).Google Scholar

Brown, Gillian, and Yule, George. Discourse Analysis, CTL (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Brugmann, Karl. Griechische Grammatik (Munich: Beck, 1885).Google Scholar

Brugmann, Karl. Kurze Vergleichende Grammatik der Indogermanische Sprachen, 3 vols. (Strassburg: Trübner, 1903).Google Scholar

Brugmann, Karl, and Delbrück, Berthold. Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der Indogermanischen Sprachen, 5 vols. (Strassburg: Trübner, 1886–1900).Google Scholar

Buber, Martin. I and Thou, trans. Walter Kaufmann (New York: Scribners, 1970).Google Scholar

Bühler, Karl. Schriften zur Sprachtheorie, ed. Eschbach, Achim (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012).Google Scholar

Bühler, Karl. Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language, trans. Donald Fraser Goodwin (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1990), English translation of Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungfunktion der Sprache (Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1934; repr., 1982).Google Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolf. The History of the Synoptic Tradition, rev. ed., trans. Marsh, John (Oxford: Blackwell, 1972 [1921]).Google Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolf. Theology of the New Testament, 2 vols., trans. Kendrick Grobel (New York: Scribners, 1951–1955), English translation of Theologie des Neuen Testaments, 2 vols. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1948–1953).Google Scholar

Burkett, Delbert. The Son of Man Debate: A History and Evaluation, SNTSMS 107 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Burkett, Delbert. The Son of the Man in the Gospel of John, JSNTSup 56 (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1991).Google Scholar

Burney, C. F. The Aramaic Origin of the Fourth Gospel (Oxford: Clarendon, 1922).Google Scholar

Burridge, Richard A. What are the Gospels? A Comparison with Graeco-Roman Biography, SNTSMS 70 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992; 2nd ed, Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2004; 3rd ed., 2017).Google Scholar

Burton, Ernest De Witt. Syntax of the Moods and Tenses in New Testament Greek (1888; 3rd ed., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1903).Google Scholar

Buss, Martin J. The Changing Shape of Form Criticism: A Relational Approach, ed. Stipe, Nickie M. (Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2010).Google Scholar

Butler, Christopher S. Structure and Function: A Guide to Three Major Structural-Functional Theories, 2 vols. (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2003).Google Scholar

Butticaz, Simon. “Theologies of the New Testament in Twentieth-Century Francophone Scholarship: An Assessment of an (Absent) Tradition,” JSNT 41 (2019) 519–36.Google Scholar

Buttmann, Alexander. A Grammar of the New Testament Greek, trans. J. H. Thayer (Andover, MA: Warren F. Draper, 1880).Google Scholar

Bynon, Theodora. Historical Linguistics, CTL (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Caird, G. B. The Apostolic Age (London: Gerald Duckworth, 1955).Google Scholar

Caird, G. B. The Language and Imagery of the Bible (Philadelphia, PA: Westminster, 1980).Google Scholar

Caird, G. B. New Testament Theology, comp. and ed. Hurst, L. D. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1994).Google Scholar

Campbell, Constantine R. “Aspect and Tense in New Testament Greek,” in Linguistics in New Testament Greek: Key Issues in the Current Debate, eds. Black, David Alan and Merkle, Benjamin L. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2020), 37–53.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle. Historical Linguistics: An Introduction (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Caragounis, Chrys C. The Development of Greek and the New Testament: Morphology, Syntax, Phonology, and Textual Transmission, WUNT 167 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004).Google Scholar

Caragounis, Chrys C. The Son of Man: Vision and Interpretation, WUNT 38 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1986).Google Scholar

Caragounis, Chrys C., ed. Greek: A Language in Evolution. Essays in Honour of Antonios N. Jannaris (Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2010).Google Scholar

Carson, D. A. Exegetical Fallacies (Grand Rapids, MA: Baker, 1984; 2nd ed., 1996).Google Scholar

Casey, Maurice. The Solution to the “Son of Man” Problem (London: T&T Clark, 2007).Google Scholar

Casey, Maurice. Son of Man: The Interpretation and Influence of Daniel 7 (London: SPCK, 1979).Google Scholar

Casson, Sarah H. Textual Signposts in the Argument of Romans: A Relevance-Theory Approach (Atlanta, GA: SBL, 2019).Google Scholar

Caton, Charles E., ed. Philosophy and Ordinary Language (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1963).Google Scholar

Chadwick, Henry. “Memoir,” in The Glory of Christ in the New Testament: Studies in Christology in Memory of George Bradford Caird, eds. Hurst, L. D. and Wright, N. T. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1987), xvii–xxii.Google Scholar

Chamberlain, William Douglas. An Exegetical Grammar of the Greek New Testament (New York: Macmillan, 1941; repr., Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1994).Google Scholar

Chapman, Siobhan. “H. P. Grice,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 108–14.Google Scholar

Chapman, Siobhan. Language and Empiricism: After the Vienna Circle (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).Google Scholar

Charles, R. H. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Revelation of St. John, ICC, 2 vols. (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1920).Google Scholar

Chatman, Seymour. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Childs, Brevard S. Biblical Theology in Crisis (Philadelphia, PA: Westminster, 1970).Google Scholar

Chilton, Bruce. “The Son of Man: Human and Heavenly,” in The Four Gospels 1992: Festschrift Frans Neirynck, eds. Van Segbroek, F., Tuckett, C. M., van Belle, G., and Verheyden, J., 3 vols., BETL 100 (Leuven: Peeters, 1992), 1:203–18.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1965).Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. Language and Mind (New York: Harcourt, Brace, World, 1968; enlarged ed., 1972).Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. Lectures on Government and Binding (Dordrecht: Foris, 1981).Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. “Linguistic Theory,” in Chomsky: Selected Readings on Transformational Theory, eds. Allen, J. P. B. and van Buren, P. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971 [1965]), 152–59.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. The Minimalist Program (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. Syntactic Structures, JL series minor 4 (The Hague: Mouton, 1957).Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. Topics in the Theory of Generative Grammar (The Hague: Mouton, 1971).Google Scholar

Christian, C. W. Friedrich Schleiermacher, MMTM (Waco, TX: Word, 1979).Google Scholar

Cirafesi, Wally V. Verbal Aspect in Synoptic Parallels: On the Method and Meaning of Divergent Tense-Form Usage in the Synoptic Passion Narratives, LBS 7 (Leiden: Brill, 2013).Google Scholar

Clackson, James. Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction, CTL (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Collinge, N. E. The Laws of Indo-European (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1985).Google Scholar

Collinge, Nigel E. “Some Reflexions on Comparative Historical Syntax,” Archivum Linguisticum 12 (1960) 79–101.Google Scholar

Cölln, Daniel Georg Conrad von. Biblische Theologie, 2 vols., ed. Schulz, David (Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth, 1836).Google Scholar

Condillac, Étienne Bonnot de. “Essai sur l’origine des connoissances humaines,” in Oeuvres de Condillac, 3 vols., ed. Le Roy, Georges (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1947), 1:1–118.Google Scholar

Conzelmann, Hans. An Outline of the Theology of the New Testament, trans. John Bowden (London: SCM Press, 1969), English translation of Grundriss der Theologie des Neuen Testaments, 2nd ed. (Munich: Christian Kaiser, 1968).Google Scholar

Conzelmann, Hans. The Theology of St Luke, trans. Geoffrey Buswell (London: Faber and Faber, 1960 [1953]).Google Scholar

Cotterell, Peter, and Turner, Max. Linguistics and Biblical Interpretation (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1989).Google Scholar

Cowie, Fiona. What’s Within? Nativism Reconsidered (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Crellin, Robert. The Syntax and Semantics of the Perfect Active in Literary Koine Greek (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016).Google Scholar

Croft, William, and Alan Cruse, D.. Cognitive Linguistics, CTL (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Crowe, Brandon D. “J. J. Griesbach and Karl Lachmann,” in Pillars in the History of Biblical Interpretation, 2 vols., eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Adams, Sean A., MBSS 2 (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2016), 1:71–90.Google Scholar

Crystal, David. A Dictionary of Language, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999 [1992]).Google Scholar

Crystal, David. Linguistics (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971).Google Scholar

Crystal, David. What Is Linguistics? 3rd ed. (London: Arnold, 1974).Google Scholar

Culler, Jonathan. Barthes, rev. ed. (London: Fontana, 1990).Google Scholar

Culler, Jonathan. “Making Sense,” Twentieth Century Studies 12 (1974) 27–36.Google Scholar

Culler, Jonathan. Saussure (London: Fontana, 1976).Google Scholar

Culler, Jonathan. Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

Cullmann, Oscar. Christ and Time: The Primitive Christian Conception of Time and History, trans. Floyd V. Filson (London: SCM Press, 1951 [1946]; 3rd rev. ed., 1962).Google Scholar

Cullmann, Oscar. The Christology of the New Testament, trans. Shirley C. Guthrie and Charles A. M. Hall, NTL (London: SCM Press, 1959 [1957]; 2nd ed., 1963).Google Scholar

Cullmann, Oscar. Immortality of the Soul or Resurrection of the Dead? The Witness of the New Testament (London: Epworth, 1958).Google Scholar

Cullmann, Oscar. Salvation in History, trans. Sidney G. Sowers (London: SCM Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Cumont, Franz. Les religions orientales dans le paganism romain (Paris: E. Leroux, 1906), English translation Oriental Religions in Roman Paganism (repr., New York: Dover, 1911).Google Scholar

Curtius, Georg. Die Bildiung der Tempora und Modi im Griechischen und Lateinischen sprachvergleichend dargestellt (Berlin: Wilhelm Besser, 1846), English translation The Greek Verb: Its Structure and Development, trans. Augustus S. Wilkins and Edwin B. England (London: John Murray, 1880).Google Scholar

Curtius, Georg. Erläuterungen zu meiner griechischen Schulgrammatik (Prague: F. Tempsky, 1863), English translation Elucidations of the Student’s Greek Grammar, 2nd ed., trans. E. Abbott (London: John Murray, 1875).Google Scholar

Curtius, Georg. Griechische Schulgrammatik (Prague: F. Tempsky, 1852).Google Scholar

D’Elia, John A. A Place at the Table: George Eldon Ladd and the Rehabilitation of Evangelical Scholarship in America (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Dana, H. E., and Mantey, Julius R.. A Manual Grammar of the Greek New Testament (New York: Macmillan, 1927).Google Scholar

Danesi, Marcel, and Rocci, Andrea. Global Linguistics: An Introduction (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2009).Google Scholar

Danove, Paul L. The End of Mark’s Story: A Methodological Study, BINS 3 (Leiden: Brill, 1993).Google Scholar

Danove, Paul L. Grammatical and Exegetical Study of New Testament Verbs of Transference: A Case Frame Guide to Interpretation and Translation, LNTS 329 (London: T&T Clark, 2009).Google Scholar

Danove, Paul L. Linguistics and Exegesis in the Gospel of Mark: Applications of a Case Frame Analysis and Lexicon, JSNTSup 218 (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 2002).Google Scholar

Danove, Paul L. New Testament Verbs of Communication: A Case Frame and Exegetical Study, LNTS 520 (London: Bloomsbury, 2015).Google Scholar

Danove, Paul L. The Rhetoric of Characterization of God, Jesus, and Jesus’ Disciples in the Gospel of Mark, JSNTSup 290 (New York: T&T Clark, 2005).Google Scholar

Danove, Paul L. Theology of the Gospel of Mark: A Semantic, Narrative, and Rhetorical Study of the Characterization of God (London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2019).Google Scholar

Davis, Thomas. Shifting Sands: The Rise and Fall of Biblical Archaeology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Davis, William Hersey. Beginner’s Grammar of the Greek New Testament (New York: Doran, 1923).Google Scholar

Dawson, Zachary K. “Monogenēs and the Social Trinity: A Test Case for Using Lexical Semantics in Systematic Theology,” MJTM 18 (2016–2017) 32–66.Google Scholar

Dawson, Zachary K. “The Problem of Gospel Genres: Unmasking a Flawed Consensus and Providing a Fresh Way Forward with Systemic Functional Linguistics Genre Theory,” BAGL 8 (2019) 33–78.Google Scholar

Dawson, Zachary K., and Dvorak, James D.. “Conclusion: Linguistic Exegesis of the Epistle of James with Reference to Exegetical Commentary Writing,” in The Epistle of James: Linguistic Exegesis of an Early Christian Letter, eds. Dvorak, James D. and Dawson, Zachary K., LENT 1 (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2019), 306–17.Google Scholar

de Jonge, Marinus. Christology in Context: The Earliest Response to Jesus (Philadelphia, PA: Westminster, 1988).Google Scholar

de Man, Paul. “Semiology and Rhetoric,” in Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1979), 3–19.Google Scholar

de Wette, Wilhelm Martin Leberecht. Biblische Dogmatik: Alten und Neuen Testaments. Oder kritische Darstellung der Religionslehre des Hebrasimus, des Judenthums und Urchristenthums (Berlin: G. Reimer, 1813).Google Scholar

Decker, Rodney J. Reading Koine Greek: An Introduction and Integrated Workbook (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2014).Google Scholar

Deissmann, G. Adolf. Bible Studies, trans. Alexander Grieve, 2nd ed. (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1903).Google Scholar

Deissmann, G. Adolf. Light from the Ancient East, trans. L. R. M. Strachan (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1910).Google Scholar

Delling, Gerhard. “καιρός κτλ.,” in Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, eds. Kittel, Gerhard and Friedrich, Gerhard, trans. Geoffrey W. Bromiley, 10 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1964–1976), 3:455–64.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. “‘Genèsse et structure’ et la phénoménologie,” in Genèse et structure, eds. de Gandillac, Maurice, Goldmann, Lucien, and Piaget, Jean (The Hague: Mouton, 1964), English translation “‘Genesis and Structure’ and Phenomenology,” in Writing and Difference, trans. Alan Bass (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978), 154–68.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. On Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976), English translation of De la Grammatologie (Paris: Minuit, 1967).Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. Speech and Phenomena, and Other Essays on Husserl’s Theory of Signs, trans. David B. Allison (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1973), English translation of La Voix et la phénomène: Introduction au problème du signe dans la phénoménologie de Husserl (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1967).Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. “Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences,” in The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man, eds. Macksey, Richard and Donato, Eugenio (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972), 247–65.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. Writing and Difference, trans. Alan Bass (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978), English translation of L’écriture et la difference (Paris: Seuil, 1967).Google Scholar

DeVries, D. “Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst,” in Historical Handbook of Major Biblical Interpreters, ed. McKim, Donald K. (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1998), 350–55.Google Scholar

Dibelius, Martin. From Tradition to Gospel, trans. Bertram Lee Woolf (London: Ivor Nicholson and Watson, 1934 [1919]).Google Scholar

Diest, Henricus von. Theologia biblica (Daventri: C. Thoma, 1643).Google Scholar

Dik, Simon C. The Theory of Functional Grammar, 2 vols., ed. Hengeveld, Kees (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1997).Google Scholar

Dinneen, Francis P. An Introduction to General Linguistics (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Dinneen, Francis P. “Linguistics and Classic Philosophy,” in Report of the Fourteenth Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies, ed. Di Pietro, Robert J., Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics 16 (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Institute of Languages and Linguistics, 1963), 3–10.Google Scholar

Dodd, C. H. The Parables of the Kingdom, rev. ed. (New York: Scribners, 1961 [1935]).Google Scholar

Doja, Albert. “Claude Lévi-Strauss at his Centennial: Toward a Future Anthropology,” TCS 25 (2008) 321–40.Google Scholar

Dooley, Robert A., and Levinsohn, Stephen H.. Analyzing Discourse: A Manual of Basic Concepts (Dallas: SIL International, 2001).Google Scholar

Downs, David J. The Offering of the Gentiles: Paul’s Collection for Jerusalem in Its Chronological, Cultural, and Cultic Contexts (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008; repr., Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2016).Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert L., and Paul, Rabinow. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Driver, Daniel R. Brevard Childs, Biblical Theologian: For the Church’s One Bible (repr., Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2010).Google Scholar

Droste, Flip G., and Joseph, John E., eds. Linguistic Theory and Grammatical Description (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1991).Google Scholar

Duden’s Die Grammatik (Mannheim: DudenVerlag, 2009).Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. G. Jesus Remembered (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003).Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. G. New Testament Theology: An Introduction (Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 2009).Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. G. The Theology of Paul the Apostle (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1998).Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. G. Unity and Diversity in the New Testament: An Inquiry into the Character of Earliest Christianity (Philadelphia, PA: Westminster, 1977).Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. G., and James, P. Mackey. New Testament Theology in Dialogue (London: SPCK, 1987).Google Scholar

Dvorak, James D., and Dawson, Zachary K., eds. The Epistle of James: Linguistic Exegesis of an Early Christian Letter, LENT 1 (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2019).Google Scholar

Easley, Kendall H. User-Friendly Greek: A Common Sense Approach to the Greek New Testament (Nashville, TN: B&H, 1994).Google Scholar

Eichh, orn, Albert. Das Abendmahl im Neuen Testament, HCW 36 (Leipzig: Mohr Siebeck, 1898).Google Scholar

Eichrodt, Walter. Theology of the Old Testament, 2 vols., trans. John Baker (London: SCM Press, 1961–1967 [1933–1939]).Google Scholar

Elhindi, Yousif. “Ferdinand de Saussure,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 241–48.Google Scholar

Eliade, Mircea. A History of Religious Ideas, 2 vols. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979–1982).Google Scholar

Ellens, J. Harold. The Son of Man in the Gospel of John, NTM 28 (Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2010).Google Scholar

Ellis, E. Earle. The Gospel of Luke, NCB (London: Marshall, Morgan and Scott, 1966; 2nd ed., 1974).Google Scholar

Ellis, E. Earle. Paul and His Recent Interpreters (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1961).Google Scholar

Erickson, Richard J. James Barr and the Beginnings of Biblical Semantics (Notre Dame, IN: Foundations Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Esler, Philip F. New Testament Theology: Communion and Community (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2005).Google Scholar

Evans, Craig A. Jesus and His Contemporaries: Comparative Studies, AGJU 25 (Leiden: Brill, 1995).Google Scholar

Evans, Richard J. In Defense of History (London: Granta, 1997).Google Scholar

Evans, Vyvyan, and Green, Melanie. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, 2nd ed. (London: Longman, 2010).Google Scholar

Fanning, Buist M. Verbal Aspect in New Testament Greek (Oxford: Clarendon, 1990).Google Scholar

Fantin, Joseph D. The Greek Imperative Mood in the New Testament: A Cognitive and Communication Approach, SBG 12 (New York: Peter Lang, 2010).Google Scholar

Fantin, Joseph D. The Lord of the Entire World: Lord Jesus, a Challenge to Lord Caesar? NTM 31 (Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2011).Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles, and Turner, Mark. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities (New York: Basic Books, 2002).Google Scholar

Feine, Paul. Theologie des Neuen Testaments, 8th ed. (Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 1953 [1922]).Google Scholar

Fergusson, David. “Bultmann, Rudolf,” in Historical Handbook of Major Biblical Interpreters, ed. Donald, K. McKim (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1998), 449–56.Google Scholar

Fergusson, David. Rudolf Bultmann (London: Continuum, 1992).Google Scholar

Fewster, Gregory P. Creation Language in Romans 8: A Study in Monosemy, LBS 8 (Leiden: Brill, 2013).Google Scholar

Feyerabend, Paul. “Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism” (1962), in Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method, Philosophical Papers 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), 44–96.Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. “The Case for Case,” in Universals in Linguistic Theory, eds. Bach, Emmon and Harms, Robert T. (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1968), 1–88.Google Scholar

Filson, Floyd V. The New Testament Against Its Environment: The Gospel of Christ the Risen Lord, SBT 3 (London: SCM Press, 1950).Google Scholar

Firbas, Jan. Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Firth, J. R. Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951 (London: Oxford University Press, 1957).Google Scholar

Firth, J. R. Selected Papers of J. R. Firth 1952–59, ed. Palmer, F. R. (London: Longmans, 1968).Google Scholar

Firth, J. R. “A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory, 1930–1955,” in Studies in Linguistic Analysis (Oxford: Blackwell, 1957), 1–32.Google Scholar

Fish, Stanley. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Fiske, John. Introduction to Communication Studies, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar

Fodor, Jerry. “Doing Without What’s Within: Fiona Cowie’s What’s Within? Nativism Reconsidered,” Mind 110 (2001) 99–148.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language, trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith (New York: Pantheon, 1972 [1969]).Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality, Vol. 3: The Care of the Self (New York: Vintage, 1988).Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, ed. Bouchard, D. F., trans. D. F. Bouchard and S. Simon (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. “What Is an Author?” (1969), in Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, ed. Bouchard, D. F., trans. D. F. Bouchard and S. Simon (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1977), 113–38.Google Scholar

Fowl, Stephen E. Theological Interpretation of Scripture (Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2009).Google Scholar

Frampton, Travis L. “Spinoza and His Influence on Biblical Interpretation,” in A History of Biblical Interpretation, Volume 3: The Enlightenment through the Nineteenth Century, eds. Hauser, Alan J. and Watson, Duane F. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2017), 120–50.Google Scholar

Fries, Peter H. “Systemic Functional Linguistics: A Close Relative of French Functional Linguistics?” La Linguistique 37 (2001) 89–100.Google Scholar

Funk, Robert W. Parables and Presence: Forms of the New Testament Tradition (Philadelphia, PA: Fortress, 1982).Google Scholar

Gabler, Johann P. “An Oration on the Proper Distinction between Biblical and Dogmatic Theology and the Specific Objectives of Each,” in The Flowering of Old Testament Theology, eds. Ollenburger, Ben C., Martens, Elmer A., and Hasel, Gerhard F. (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1992), 489–502, English translation of Oratio de iusto discrimine theologiae biblicae et dogmaticae regundisque recte ultriusque finibus, repr. in Kleinere theologische Schriften, eds. Gabler, T. A. and Gabler, J. G., 2 vols. (Ulm: Stettin, 1831), 2:179–98.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method, 2nd ed., trans. Joel Weinsheimer and Donald Marshall (New York: Crossroad, 1989; 2nd rev. ed., New York: Continuum, 2002).Google Scholar

Galen, F. W. Historic Structures: The Prague School Project, 1928–1948 (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Gardiner, Alan. The Theory of Speech and Language, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1951 [1932]).Google Scholar

Garvin, Paul L., ed. and trans. A Prague School Reader on Esthetics, Literary Structure, and Style (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1964).Google Scholar

Gee, James Paul. Introducing Discourse Analysis: From Grammar to Society (London: Routledge, 2018).Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford. “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture,” in The Interpretation of Cultures (New York: Basic Books, 1973), 3–30.Google Scholar

Genette, Gérard. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method, trans. Jane E. Lewin (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Giacobbe, Mark S. Review of Intermediate Greek Grammar by David L. Mathewson and Elodie Ballantine Emig, WTJ 80 (2018) 376–79.Google Scholar

Giannakis, Georgios K. “Can a Historical Greek Grammar Be Written? – An Appraisal of A. N. Jannaris’ Work,” in Greek: A Language in Evolution. Essays in Honour of Antonios N. Jannaris, ed. Caragounis, Chrys C. (Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2010), 296–313.Google Scholar

Gibson, Richard J., and Campbell, Constantine R.. Reading Biblical Greek: A Grammar for Students (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2017).Google Scholar

Giles, Peter. A Short Manual of Comparative Philology, 2nd ed. (London: Macmillan, 1901).Google Scholar

Gilkey, Langdon. “Cosmology, Ontology, and the Travail of Biblical Language,” JR 41 (1961) 194–205.Google Scholar

Gleason Jr., Henry A. An Introduction to Descriptive Linguistics, rev. ed. (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1961).Google Scholar

Gnilka, Joachim. Neutestamentliche Theologie: Ein Überblick (Würzburg: Echter, 1989).Google Scholar

Gnilka, Joachim. Theologie des Neuen Testaments, HTKNT (Freiburg: Herder, 1994).Google Scholar

Godel, Robert, ed. A Geneva School Reader in Linguistics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1969).Google Scholar

Goertz, Hans-Jürgen. Unsichere Geschichte: Zur Theorie historischer Referentialität (Stuttgart: Reclam, 2001).Google Scholar

Goetchius, Eugene Van Ness. The Language of the New Testament (New York: Scribner, 1965).Google Scholar

Goodwin, William Watson. A Greek Grammar, rev. ed. (Boston, MA: Ginn, 1892).Google Scholar

Goodwin, William Watson. Greek Grammar, rev. Charles Burton Gulick (Boston, MA: Ginn, 1930).Google Scholar

Goppelt, Leonhard. Theology of the New Testament, 2 vols., ed. Roloff, Jürgen, trans. John Alsup (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1981–1982), English translation of Theologie des Neuen Testaments, 2 vols. (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1975–1976).Google Scholar

Gordley, Matthew E. New Testament Christological Hymns: Exploring Texts, Contexts, and Significance (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2018).Google Scholar

Gordon, Scott. The History and Philosophy of Social Science (London: Routledge, 1991).Google Scholar

Götzsche, Hans. “Louis Hjelmslev,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 124–27.Google Scholar

Götzsche, Hans. “Rasmus Rask,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 226–27.Google Scholar

Götzsche, Hans. “Roman Jakobson,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 139–47.Google Scholar

Grässer, Erich. “Beobachtungen zum Menschensohn in Hebr 2,6,” in Jesus und der Menschensohn, für Anton Vögtle, eds. Pesch, Rudolf and Schnackenburg, Rudolf (Freiburg: Herder, 1975), 404–14.Google Scholar

Green, Joel B. Practicing Theological Interpretation: Engaging Biblical Texts for Faith and Formation (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2011).Google Scholar

Green, Joel B. Seized by Truth: Reading the Bible as Scripture (Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 2007).Google Scholar

Green, Thomas Sheldon. A Treatise on the Grammar of the New Testament Dialect; Embracing Observations on the Literal Interpretation of Numerous Passages (London: Bagster, 1842).Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph. Language Universals (The Hague: Mouton, 1966).Google Scholar

Greimas, A.-J. Structural Semantics: An Attempt at a Method, trans. Daniel McDowell, Ronald Schleifer, and Alan Velie (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1983), English translation of Sémantique structurale: Recherche de méthode (Paris: Larousse, 1966).Google Scholar

Grenz, Stanley J., and Olson, Roger E.. Twentieth-Century Theology: God and the World in a Transitional Age (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1992).Google Scholar

Grice, H. Paul. “Logic and Conversation,” in Syntax and Semantics, Volume 3: Speech Acts, eds. Cole, Peter and Jerry, L. Morgan (New York: Academic, 1975), 41–58.Google Scholar

Grice, H. Paul. “Meaning,” Philosophical Review 66 (1957) 377–88.Google Scholar

Grice, H. Paul. Studies in the Way of Words (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Grimm, Jacob. Deutsche Grammatik (Göttingen: Dieterichschen Buchhandlung, 1819–1837).Google Scholar

Gumperz, John J., and Levinson, Stephen C., eds. Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Gunkel, Hermann. Genesis: Translated and Explained, trans. Mark Biddle (Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1997 [1901]).Google Scholar

Gunkel, Hermann. Schöpfung und Chaos in Urzeit und Endzeit: Eine religionsgeschichtliche Untersuchung über Gen 1 und Ap Joh 12 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1895), English translation Creation and Chaos in the Primeval Era and the Eschaton: A Religio-Historical Study of Genesis 1 and Revelation 12, trans. K. William Whitney (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2006).Google Scholar

Gupta, Nijay K. Worship that Makes Sense to Paul: A New Approach to the Theology and Ethics of Paul’s Cultic Metaphors, BZNW 175 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2010).Google Scholar

Guthrie, Donald. New Testament Theology (Leicester: InterVarsity, 1981).Google Scholar

Gutt, Ernst-August. Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context (Oxford: Blackwell, 1991; repr., Manchester: St. Jerome, 2010).Google Scholar

Hafemann, S. J. “Baur, F(erdinand) C(hristian),” in Historical Handbook of Major Biblical Interpreters, ed. McKim, Donald K. (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1998), 285–89.Google Scholar

Hahn, Ferdinand. The Titles of Jesus in Christology: Their History in Early Christianity, trans. H. Knight and G. Ogg (New York: World, 1969).Google Scholar

Hahn, H.-C. “καιρός,” in The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology, ed. Colin, Brown, 3 vols. (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1975–1978), 3:833–39.Google Scholar

Hahn, Stephen. On Derrida (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson, 2002).Google Scholar

Hall Jr., Robert A. Linguistics and Your Language, 2nd ed. (Garden City, NY: Anchor, 1960).Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th ed., rev. Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen (London: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. “Introduction: On the ‘Architecture’ of Human Language,” in On Language and Linguistics, ed. Webster, Jonathan J., Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday 3 (London: Continuum, 2003), 1–29.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning (London: Arnold, 1978).Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. “Language Structure and Language Function,” in New Horizons in Linguistics, ed. Lyons, John (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1970), 140–65.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. “Meaning as Choice,” in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring Choice, eds. Fontaine, Lise, Bartlett, Tom, and O’Grady, Gerard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 15–36.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K., and Webster, Jonathan J.. Text Linguistics: The How and Why of Meaning (Sheffield: Equinox, 2014).Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K., and Hasan, Ruqaiya. Cohesion in English (London: Longman, 1976).Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K., and Hasan, Ruqaiya. Language, Context, and Text, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Hamerton-Kelly, R. G. Pre-Existence, Wisdom and the Son of Man: A Study of the Idea of Pre-Existence in the New Testament, SNTSMS 21 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973).Google Scholar

Hammann, Konrad. Rudolf Bultmann: A Biography, trans. Philip E. Devenish (Salem, OR: Polebridge, 2013).Google Scholar

Hare, Douglas R. A. The Son of Man Tradition (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1990).Google Scholar

Harris, Horton. The Tübingen School: A Historical and Theological Investigation of the School of F. C. Baur (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975; repr., Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1990).Google Scholar

Harris, James. Hermes, Or, A Philosophical Inquiry Concerning Universal Grammar (London, 1765).Google Scholar

Harris, Murray J. Prepositions and Theology in the Greek New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2012).Google Scholar

Harris, Zellig S. Structural Linguistics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951).Google Scholar

Harrisville, Roy A., and Sundberg, Walter. The Bible in Modern Culture: Baruch Spinoza to Brevard Childs, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2002).Google Scholar

Hart, D. G. “Machen, J(ohn) Gresham,” in Historical Handbook of Major Biblical Interpreters, ed. Donald, K. McKim (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1998), 595–98.Google Scholar

Hasel, Gerhard. New Testament Theology: Basic Issues in the Current Debate (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1978).Google Scholar

Hasselbrook, David S. Studies in New Testament Lexicography: Advancing toward a Full Diachronic Approach with the Greek Language, WUNT 2/303 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011).Google Scholar

Hatch, Edwin. Essays in Biblical Greek (Oxford: Clarendon, 1889).Google Scholar

Hatina, Thomas R. New Testament Theology and its Quest for Relevance: Ancient Texts and Modern Readers (London: Bloomsbury, 2013).Google Scholar

Hatzidakis, Georgios N. Einleitung in die Neugriechische Grammatik (Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1892; repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1977).Google Scholar

Havránek, Bohuslav. “The Functional Differentiation of the Standard Language,” in A Prague School Reader on Esthetics, Literary Structure, and Style, ed. and trans. Garvin, Paul L. (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1964), 3–16.Google Scholar

Hays, Richard B. Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Hays, Richard B. “Humanity Prior to the Revelation of Faith,” in Beyond Bultmann: Reckoning a New Testament Theology, eds. Longenecker, Bruce W. and Parsons, Mikeal C. (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2014), 61–77.Google Scholar

Hays, Richard B., Alkier, Stefan, and Huizenga, Leroy A., eds. Reading the Bible Intertextually (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time, trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson (New York: Harper & Row, 1962).Google Scholar

Heim, Erin M. Adoption in Galatians and Romans: Contemporary Metaphor Theories and the Pauline Huiothesia Metaphors, BINS 153 (Leiden: Brill, 2017).Google Scholar

Heitmüller, Wilhelm. Taufe und Abendmahl bie Paulus: Darstellung und religionsgeschichtliche Beleuchtung (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1903).Google Scholar

Hengel, Martin. Studies in Early Christology (London: T&T Clark, 1995).Google Scholar

Hengel, Martin. The Son of God, trans. John Bowden (London: SCM Press, 1976 [1975]).Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. “Essay on the Origin of Language,” in On the Origin of Language, trans. Alexander Gode (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966), 87–166.Google Scholar

Herrmann-Kaliner, Eva. “André Martinet,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 187–89.Google Scholar

Higgins, A. J. B. Jesus and the Son of Man (London: Lutterworth, 1964).Google Scholar

Higgins, A. J. B. The Son of Man in the Teaching of Jesus, SNTSMS 39 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Hirsch Jr., E. D. Validity in Interpretation (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Hjelmslev, Louis. La catégorie des cas: Étude de grammaire générale, 2 vols. (Aarhus: Universitetsforlaget, 1935–1937; repr., Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1972).Google Scholar

Hjelmslev, Louis. Essais linguistiques (Paris: Minuit, 1971 [1959]).Google Scholar

Hjelmslev, Louis. Prolegomena to a Theory of Language, trans. Whitfield, Francis J., rev. ed. (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1961 [1943]).Google Scholar

Hjelmslev, Louis. Résumé of a Theory of Language, ed. and trans. Whitfield, Francis J. (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1975 [manuscript 1943–1944]).Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles F. A Course in Modern Linguistics (New York: Macmillan, 1958).Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles F. The State of the Art, JL series minor 78 (The Hague: Mouton, 1968).Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles F., ed. A Leonard Bloomfield Anthology, abr. ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Hodgson, Peter C. The Formation of Historical Theology: A Study of Ferdinand Christian Baur (New York: Harper & Row, 1966).Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Ernst G., and von Siebenthal, Heinrich. Griechische Grammatik zum Neuen Testament (Riehen: Immanuel, 1985).Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Otto. Die Griechischen Dialekte in ihrem historischen Zusammenhange, 3 vols. (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1891–1898).Google Scholar

Hoijer, Harry, ed. Language in Culture: Conference on the Interrelations of Language and Other Aspects of Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1954).Google Scholar

Hollander, John. The Figure of Echo: A Mode of Allusion in Milton and After (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Holquist, Michael. Dialogism, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar

Holtzmann, Heinrich Julius. Lehrbuch der Neutestamentlichen Theologie, 2 vols., eds. Jülicher, A. and Bauer, W. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1911).Google Scholar

Honeybone, Patrick. “J. R. Firth,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 80–86.Google Scholar

Honeybone, Patrick. “Jacob Grimm,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 114–16.Google Scholar

Honeybone, Patrick. “Karl Brugmann,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 45–48.Google Scholar

Honeybone, Patrick. “N. S. Trubetzkoy,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 267–68.Google Scholar

Honour, Hugh. Romanticism (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1979).Google Scholar

Hooker, Morna D. The Son of Man in Mark: A Study of the Background of the Term “Son of Man” and its Use in St Mark’s Gospel (London: SPCK, 1967).Google Scholar

Hordern, William E. A Layman’s Guide to Protestant Theology, rev. ed. (New York: Collier/Macmillan, 1968).Google Scholar

Hordern, William E. New Directions in Theology Today, Volume 1: Introduction (London: Lutterworth, 1966).Google Scholar

Howe, Bonnie. Because You Bear This Name: Conceptual Metaphor and the Moral Meaning of 1 Peter, BINS 81 (Leiden: Brill, 2008).Google Scholar

Howells, Christina. Derrida: Deconstruction from Phenomenology to Ethics (Cambridge: Polity, 1998).Google Scholar

Hubbeling, H. G. Spinoza’s Methodology (Assen: Van Gorcum, 1967).Google Scholar

Hübner, Hans. Biblische Theologie des Neuen Testaments, 3 vols. (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1990–1995).Google Scholar

Hudson, Richard A. Invitation to Linguistics (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985).Google Scholar

Hudson, Richard A. “Some Issues on which Linguists Can Agree,” JoL 17 (1981) 333–43.Google Scholar

Hultgren, Arland J. The Parables of Jesus: A Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2000).Google Scholar

Humboldt, Wilhelm von. On Language: On the Diversity of Human Language Construction and its Influence on the Mental Development of the Human Species, ed. Losonsky, Michael, trans. Peter Heath (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Humboldt, Wilhelm von. Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwickelung des Menschengeschlechts (Berlin: Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1836), English translation On Language: On the Diversity of Human Language Construction and its Influence on the Mental Development of the Human Species, ed. Losonsky, Michael, trans. Peter Heath (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Hunter, Ian. “Scenes from the History of Poststructuralism: Davos, Freiburg, Baltimore, Leipzig,” NLH 41 (2010) 491–516.Google Scholar

Hurst, L. D. “Caird, G(eorge) B(radford),” in Historical Handbook of Major Biblical Interpreters, ed. McKim, Donald K. (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1998), 456–62.Google Scholar

Hurtado, Larry W. Ancient Jewish Monotheism and Early Christian Jesus-Devotion: The Context and Character of Christological Faith (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Hurtado, Larry W. At the Origins of Christian Worship: The Context and Character of Earliest Christian Devotion (Carlisle: Paternoster, 1999).Google Scholar

Hurtado, Larry W. How on Earth Did Jesus Become a God? Historical Questions about Earliest Devotion to Jesus (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2005).Google Scholar

Hurtado, Larry W. Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003).Google Scholar

Hurtado, Larry W. One God, One Lord: Early Christian Devotion and Ancient Jewish Monotheism (London: SCM Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Hurtado, Larry W. “Summary and Concluding Observations,” in “Who is This Son of Man?”: The Latest Scholarship on a Puzzling Expression of the Historical Jesus, eds. Hurtado, Larry W. and Owen, Paul L., LNTS 390 (London: T&T Clark, 2011), 159–77.Google Scholar

Hurtado, Larry W., and Owen, Paul L., eds. “Who is This Son of Man?”: The Latest Scholarship on a Puzzling Expression of the Historical Jesus, LNTS 390 (London: T&T Clark, 2011).Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. Logical Investigations, trans. John N. Findlay (New York: Humanities, 1970), English translation of Logische Untersuchungen (Halle: M. Niemeyer, 1900–1901; 2nd ed., 1913).Google Scholar

Iser, Wolfgang. The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974).Google Scholar

Ivić, Milka. Trends in Linguistics, trans. Muriel Heppell, JL series minor 42 (The Hague: Mouton, 1965).Google Scholar

Jackson, Leonard. The Poverty of Structuralism: Literature and Structuralist Theory (London: Longman, 1991).Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. “Autobiographical Notes on N. S. Trubetzkoy, As Related by Roman Jakobson,” in Introduction to the Principles of Phonological Descriptions, by Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S., trans. L. A. Murray, ed. Bluhme, H. (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1968), 309–23.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. “Linguistics and Poetics,” in Style in Language, ed. Sebeok, Thomas A. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1960), 350–77.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. On Language, eds. Waugh, Linda R. and Monville-Burston, Monique (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. “Signe zéro,” in Mélanges de linguistique et de philologie offerts à J. van Ginneken à l’occasion du soixantième anniversaire de sa naissance (21 avril 1937) (Paris: Klincksieck, 1937), 143–52, repr. in Selected Writings II: Word and Language (The Hague: Mouton, 1971), 212–19.Google Scholar

Jameson, Frederic. “Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism,” New Left Review 146 (1984) 53–92.Google Scholar

Jameson, Frederic. The Prison-House of Language: A Critical Account of Structuralism and Russian Formalism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1972).Google Scholar

Jankowsky, Kurt R. The Neogrammarians, JL series minor 116 (The Hague: Mouton, 1972).Google Scholar

Jannaris, A. N. A Historical Greek Grammar Chiefly of the Attic Dialect (London: Macmillan, 1897).Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. Language: Its Nature, Development, and Origin (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1922).Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. The Philosophy of Grammar (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1924).Google Scholar

Jodock, Darrell. “Biblical Interpretation in the Work of F. C. Baur and the Tübingen School,” in A History of Biblical Interpretation, Volume 3: The Enlightenment through the Nineteenth Century, eds. Hauser, Alan J. and Watson, Duane F. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2017), 170–91.Google Scholar

Johnson, Aubrey R. The One and the Many in the Israelite Conception of God (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1942).Google Scholar

Johnson, Aubrey R. The Vitality of the Individual in the Thought of Ancient Israel (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1949; 2nd ed., 1964).Google Scholar

Johnson, Luke Timothy. The Writings of the New Testament (Philadelphia, PA: Fortress, 1986).Google Scholar

Johnson, Marta K., ed. and trans. Recycling the Prague Linguistic Circle (Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma, 1978).Google Scholar

Johnson, Paul. The Birth of the Modern: World Society 1815–1830 (New York: HarperCollins, 1991).Google Scholar

Johnston, Charles M. McMaster University, 2 vols. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976–1981).Google Scholar

Jones, William. Discourses: Delivered at the Asiatick Society 1785–1792 (repr., London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Joseph, John E., and Taylor, Talbot J., eds. Ideologies of Language (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar

Kähler, Martin. The So-Called Historical Jesus and the Historic, Biblical Christ, trans. Carl E. Braaten (Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Fortress, 1964).Google Scholar

Kaiser, Gottlob Philipp Christian. Die biblische Theologie, oder Judaismus und Christianismus nach der grammatisch-historischen Interpretation und nach einer freymütigen Stellung in die kritischvergleichende Universalgeschichte der Religionen, und die universale Religion, 3 vols. (Erlangen: Johann Jacob Palm, 1813–1821).Google Scholar

Kapahu, William K. K. “Walther Eichrodt: His Times and His Theology,” in Pillars in the History of Biblical Interpretation, 2 vols., eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Adams, Sean A., MBSS 2 (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2016), 1:367–85.Google Scholar

Kasher, Asa. “J. L. Austin,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 10–16.Google Scholar

Kaye, Alan S. “Franz Bopp,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 42–43.Google Scholar

Kaye, Alan S. “Wilhelm von Humboldt,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 128–31.Google Scholar

Kim, Seyoon. “The ‘Son of Man’” as the Son of God (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1983; repr., Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1985).Google Scholar

King, Winston L. “Some Ambiguities in Biblical Theology,” Religion in Life 27 (1957–1958) 95–104.Google Scholar

Kittel, Gerhard, and Friedrich, Gerhard, eds. Theologisches Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament, 9 vols. (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1933–1979), English translation Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, trans. Geoffrey W. Bromiley, 10 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1964–1976).Google Scholar

Klink III, Edward W., and Darian, R. Lockett. Understanding Biblical Theology: A Comparison of Theory and Practice (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2012).Google Scholar

Klutz, Todd. The Exorcism Stories in Luke–Acts: A Sociostylistic Reading, SNTSMS 129 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Koerner, E. F. K. “Notes on the History of the Concept of Language as a System ‘Où tout se tient,’” Linguistica Atlantica 19 (1997) 1–20.Google Scholar

Koester, Helmut. “Early Christianity from the Perspective of the History of Religions: Rudolf Bultmann’s Contribution” (1985), repr. in Paul and His World: Interpreting the New Testament in Its Context (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2007), 267–78.Google Scholar

Koester, Helmut. “The History-of-Religions School, Gnosis, and the Gospel of John” (1986), repr. in From Jesus to the Gospels: Interpreting the New Testament in Its Context (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2007), 105–21.Google Scholar

Köstenberger, Andreas J., Merkle, Benjamin L., and Plummer, Robert L.. Going Deeper with New Testament Greek: An Intermediate Study of the Grammar and Syntax of the New Testament (Nashville, TN: B&H, 2016).Google Scholar

Kousta, Stavroula-Thaleia. “Julia Kristeva,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 166–72.Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Kretschmer, Paul. Einleitung in die Geschichte der Griechischen Sprache (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1896).Google Scholar

Kristeva, Julia. Language – The Unknown: An Initiation into Linguistics, trans. Anne M. Menke (New York: Columbia University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Kristeva, Julia. La révolution du langage poétique: L’avant-garde à la fin du XIXe siècle. Lautréamont et Mallarmé (Paris: Seuil, 1974).Google Scholar

Kristeva, Julia. Revolution in Poetic Language, trans. Margaret Waller (New York: Columbia University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Kristeva, Julia. “Revolution in Poetic Language,” in The Kristeva Reader, ed. Moi, Toril (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), 90–136.Google Scholar

Kristeva, Julia. Σημειωτικὴ: Recherches pour une sémanalyse (Paris: Seuil, 1969).Google Scholar

Kristeva, Julia. “Word, Dialogue and Novel,” in Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art, ed. Roudiez, Léon S., trans. Alice Jardine, Tomas A. Gora, and Léon S. Roudiez (Oxford: Blackwell, 1980), 52–91, English translation of Σημειωτικὴ: Recherches pour une sémanalyse (Paris: Seuil, 1969), 82–112.Google Scholar

Krumbacher, Karl. Das Problem des neugriechischen Schriftsprache (Munich: G. Frank’schen, 1902).Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S. “Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability” (1983), in The Road since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993, with an Autobiographical Interview, eds. Conant, James and Haugeland, John (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), 32–57.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S. “Reflections on my Critics,” in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, eds. Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970), 231–78.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar

Kümmel, Werner Georg. The New Testament: The History of the Investigation of its Problems, trans. S. MacLean Gilmour and Howard Clark Kee (Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1972).Google Scholar

Kümmel, Werner Georg. Promise and Fulfillment: The Eschatological Message of Jesus (London: SPCK, 1957).Google Scholar

Kümmel, Werner Georg. The Theology of the New Testament, trans. John E. Steely (Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1978), English translation of Die Theologie des Neuen Testaments (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1969).Google Scholar

Kuss, Otto. Die Theologie des Neuen Testamentes: Eine Einführung (Regensburg: Pustet, 1937).Google Scholar

Kwong, Ivan Shin Chun. The Word Order of the Gospel of Luke: Its Foregrounded Messages, LNTS 298 (London: T&T Clark, 2006).Google Scholar

Ladd, George Eldon. The Presence of the Future: The Eschatology of Biblical Realism (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1974).Google Scholar

Ladd, George Eldon. A Theology of the New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1974; rev. Donald A. Hagner, 1993).Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. “The Invariance Hypothesis: Is Abstract Reason Based on Image-Schemas?” Cognitive Linguistics 1 (1990) 39–74.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark. Metaphors We Live By (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Lamb, David A. Text, Context and the Johannine Community: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of the Johannine Writings, LNTS 477 (London: Bloomsbury, 2014).Google Scholar

Land, Christopher D. The Integrity of 2 Corinthians and Paul’s Aggravating Absence, NTM 36 (Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2015).Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. Cognitive Grammar (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. Language and Its Structure: Some Fundamental Linguistic Concepts (New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, 1968).Google Scholar

Langendoen, D. Terence. The London School of Linguistics: A Study of the Linguistic Theories of B. Malinowski and J. R. Firth (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1968).Google Scholar

Lanier, Gregory R. Old Testament Conceptual Metaphors and the Christology of Luke’s Gospel, LNTS 591 (London: Bloomsbury, 2018).Google Scholar

Lappenga, Benjamin J. Paul’s Language of Ζῆλος: Monosemy and the Rhetoric of Identity and Practice, BINS 137 (Leiden: Brill, 2015).Google Scholar

LaSor, William Sanford. Handbook of New Testament Greek: An Inductive Approach Based on the Greek Text of Acts, 2 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1973).Google Scholar

Law, Vivien. The History of Linguistics in Europe, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Leach, Edmund. Lévi-Strauss (London: Fontana/Collins, 1970).Google Scholar

Lechte, John. Fifty Key Contemporary Thinkers: From Structuralism to Post-Humanism, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar

Lee, Jae-Hyun. Paul’s Gospel in Romans: A Discourse Analysis of Rom 1:16–8:39, LBS 3 (Leiden: Brill, 2010).Google Scholar

Lee, John A. L. A History of New Testament Lexicography, SBG 8 (New York: Peter Lang, 2003).Google Scholar

Lee, John J. H. “Kenneth Lee Pike’s Tagmemics and Its Discourse Analytic Implications for the Interpretation of the New Testament,” in Pillars in the History of Biblical Interpretation, Volume 3: Further Essays on Prevailing Methods, eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Dawson, Zachary K., MBBS 6 (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2021), 333–53.Google Scholar

Lee, Penny. The Whorf Theory Complex: A Critical Reconstruction (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1996).Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey, and Thomas, Jenny. “Language, Meaning and Context: Pragmatics,” in An Encyclopaedia of Language, ed. Collinge, N. E. (London: Routledge, 1990), 173–206.Google Scholar

Legaspi, Michael C. “The Term ‘Enlightenment’ and Biblical Interpretation,” in A History of Biblical Interpretation, Volume 3: The Enlightenment through the Nineteenth Century, eds. Hauser, Alan J. and Watson, Duane F. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2017), 73–92.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Winfred P. Language: An Introduction (New York: Random House, 1983).Google Scholar

Lehmann, Winfred P., ed. and trans. A Reader in Nineteenth-Century Historical Indo-European Linguistics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Lemke, Jay L. “Discourses in Conflict: Heteroglossia and Text Semantics,” in Systemic Functional Approaches to Discourse: Selected Papers from the 12^th International Systemic Workshop, eds. Benson, James D. and Greaves, William S. (Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1988), 29–50.Google Scholar

Lemke, Jay L. “Ideology, Intertextuality and the Communication of Science,” in Relations and Functions within and around Language, eds. Fries, Peter H., Cummings, Michael, Lockwood, David, and Spruiell, William (London: Continuum, 2002), 32–55.Google Scholar

Lemke, Jay L. “Ideology, Intertextuality, and the Notion of Register,” in Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, eds. Benson, James D. and Greaves, William S. (Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1985), 275–94.Google Scholar

Lemke, Jay L. “Interpersonal Meaning in Discourse: Value Orientations,” in Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice, eds. Davies, Martin and Ravelli, Louise (London: Pinter, 1992), 82–104.Google Scholar

Lemke, Jay L. “Intertextuality and Text Semantics,” in Discourse in Society: Systemic Functional Perspectives, eds. Howard Fries, Peter, Gregory, Michael, and Halliday, M. A. K. (Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1995), 85–114.Google Scholar

Lemke, Jay L. “Intertextuality and the Project of Text Linguistics,” Text 20 (2000) 221–25.Google Scholar

Lemke, Jay L. Textual Politics (London: Taylor and Francis, 1995).Google Scholar

Lemke, Jay L. “Thematic Analysis: Systems, Structures, and Strategies,” Semiotic Inquiry 3 (1983) 159–87.Google Scholar

Lemon, Lee T., and Reis, Marion J., eds. and trans. Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1965).Google Scholar

Lepschy, Giulio C. A Survey of Structural Linguistics (London: Andre Deutsch, 1970; 2nd ed., 1985).Google Scholar

Lepschy, Giulio C., ed. History of Linguistics: Classical and Medieval Linguistics (London: Longman, 1990).Google Scholar

Leroy, Maurice. The Main Trends in Modern Linguistics, trans. Glanville Price (Oxford: Blackwell, 1967).Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. The Elementary Structures of Kinship, trans. James Bell, John von Sturmer, and Rodney Needham (Boston, MA: Beacon, 1969).Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. Race and History (Paris: UNESCO Publications, 1958).Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. The Raw and the Cooked, trans. John and Doreen Wightman (New York: Harper and Row, 1969).Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. The Savage Mind (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966).Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. Tristes tropiques, trans. John Russell (London: Hutchinson, 1961).Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude, and Jakobson, Roman. “‘Les Chats’ de Charles Baudelaire,” L’Homme 2 (1962) 5–21, English translation “Charles Baudelaire’s ‘Les Chats,’” in Introduction to Structuralism, ed. Lane, Michael (New York: Basic Books, 1970), 202–21.Google Scholar

Levinsohn, Stephen H. Discourse Features of New Testament Greek: A Coursebook on the Information Structure of New Testament Greek, 2nd ed. (Dallas, TX: SIL International, 2000).Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. Pragmatics, CTL (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Libby, James A. “The Pauline Canon Sung in a Linguistic Key: Visualizing New Testament Text Proximity by Linguistic Structure, System, and Strata,” BAGL 5 (2016) 122–201.Google Scholar

Liebenberg, Jacobus. The Language of the Kingdom and Jesus: Parable, Aphorism, and Metaphor in the Sayings Material Common to the Synoptic Tradition and the Gospel of Thomas, BZNW 102 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2001).Google Scholar

Lietzmann, Hans. An die Korinther I-II, 3rd ed., HNT 9 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1931).Google Scholar

Lietzmann, Hans. Der Menschensohn: Ein Beitrag zur neutestamentlichen Theologie (Freiburg: Mohr, 1896).Google Scholar

Lincicum, David. “Ferdinand Christian Baur and Biblical Theology,” ASE 30 (2013) 79–92.Google Scholar

Lindars, Barnabas. Jesus Son of Man: A Fresh Examination of the Son of Man Sayings in the Gospels (London: SPCK, 1983).Google Scholar

Loisy, Alfred. The Gospel and the Church, trans. Christopher Home (London: Isbister, 1903).Google Scholar

Long, Frederick J. Κοινὴ Γραμματική Koine Greek Grammar: A Beginning-Intermediate Exegetical and Pragmatic Handbook (Wilmore, KY: Glossa House, 2015).Google Scholar

Longacre, Robert E. The Grammar of Discourse, 2nd ed. (New York: Plenum, 1996).Google Scholar

Longacre, Robert E. “Tagmemics as a Framework for Discourse Analysis,” in Second Annual Linguistic Metatheory Conference Proceedings 1977, ed. Wang, James (East Lansing, MI: Department of Linguistics, Michigan State University, 1977), 1–27.Google Scholar

Longenecker, Bruce W., and Parsons, Mikeal C., eds. Beyond Bultmann: Reckoning a New Testament Theology (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Longenecker, Richard N. Galatians, Word Biblical Commentary 41 (Dallas, TX: Word, 1990).Google Scholar

Louw, J. P. Semantics of New Testament Greek (Philadelphia, PA: Fortress; Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Louw, Johannes P., and Nida, Eugene A.. Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament Based on Semantic Domains, 2 vols. (New York: American Bible Society, 1988).Google Scholar

Lucy, John A. Grammatical Categories and Cognition: A Case Study of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Lucy, John A. Language Diversity and Thought: A Reformulation of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Lyons, John. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968).Google Scholar

Lyons, John. Language and Linguistics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Lyons, John. Noam Chomsky, rev. ed. (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977).Google Scholar

Lyons, John. Semantics, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Lyons, John. Structural Semantics: An Analysis of Part of the Vocabulary of Plato, Publications of the Philological Society 20 (Oxford: Blackwell, 1963).Google Scholar

Malinowski, Bronisław. Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea (New York: Dutton, 1961 [1922]).Google Scholar

Malinowski, Bronisław. “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages,” in The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism, by Ogden, C. K. and Richards, I. A., 3rd ed. rev. (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1930 [1923]), 296–336.Google Scholar

Marchese, Maria Pia, ed. Ferdinand de Saussure, Phonétique: Il manoscritto di Harvard Houghton Library bMS Fr 266 (8) (Florence: Unipress, 1995).Google Scholar

Marsh, John. The Fulness of Time (London: Nisbet, 1952).Google Scholar

Marshall, I. Howard. Beyond the Bible: Moving from Scripture to Theology, with essays by Kevin J. Vanhoozer and Stanley E. Porter (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2004).Google Scholar

Marshall, I. Howard. New Testament Theology: Many Witnesses, One Gospel (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2004).Google Scholar

Martín-Asensio, Gustavo. Transitivity-Based Foregrounding in the Acts of the Apostles: A Functional-Grammatical Approach to the Lukan Perspective, JSNTSup 202, SNTG 8 (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 2000).Google Scholar

Martin, Dale B. Biblical Truths: The Meaning of Scripture in the Twenty-First Century (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Martin, Dale B. The Corinthian Body (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Martin, Dale B. Inventing Superstition from the Hippocratics to the Christians (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Martin, Dale B. New Testament History and Literature (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Martin, Dale B. Pedagogy of the Bible: An Analysis and Proposal (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2008).Google Scholar

Martin, Dale B. Sex and the Single Savior: Gender and Sexuality in Biblical Interpretation (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2006).Google Scholar

Martin, Dale B. Slavery as Salvation: The Metaphor of Slavery in Pauline Christianity (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Martinet, André. Elements of General Linguistics, trans. Elisabeth Palmer (London: Faber and Faber, 1964), English translation of Elements de Linguistique Générale (Paris: Armand Colin, 1960).Google Scholar

Martinet, André. A Functional View of Language (Oxford: Clarendon, 1962).Google Scholar

Marxsen, Willi. Mark the Evangelist: Studies on the Redaction History of the Gospel, trans. James Boyce et al. (Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1969 [1956]).Google Scholar

Masterman, Margaret. “The Nature of a Paradigm,” in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, eds. Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970), 59–90.Google Scholar

Matejka, Ladislav. “Jakobson’s Response to Saussure’s Cours,” Cahiers de l’ILSL 9 (1997) 169–76.Google Scholar