Introduction

doi:10.1017/9781108283748.002

Introduction

Genealogies of Japanese Early Modernity

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 January 2024

David L. Howell

Edited by

David L. Howell

Show author details

David L. Howell: Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts

Book contents

Get access

Summary

I introduce this volume of the New Cambridge History of Japan with two questions: How is it that Anglophone scholars have come to refer to the Tokugawa period (1603–1868) and immediately surrounding years as Japan’s “early modern” period? And does calling the period early modern suggest something fundamentally different from the term used in Japanese, kinsei? When the first Cambridge History of Japan was published, in 1991, the answer to the latter question was yes: the kinsei of “the Japanese” was “more feudal than modern,” whereas the early modernity of “Western historians” was “more modern than feudal.” As this introduction demonstrates, however, the term kinsei has nothing to do with feudalism. The evolution of the terms of periodization used to refer to the Tokugawa era tell us something important about the global history of conceptualizing historical time, particularly the surprising career of modernity.

Keywords

early modernity historiography kindai kinsei modernity Naitō Konan periodization Song Tokugawa Uchida Ginzō

Type: Chapter
Information: The New Cambridge History of Japan , pp. 1 - 12

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108283748.002 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Araki, Moriaki. “Hōsoku ninshiki to jidai kubunron.” In Sengo Nihon shigaku no tenkai, edited by Asao, Naohiro, Ishii Susumu, Inoue Mitsusada, Ōishi Kaichirō, Kano Masanao, Kuroda Toshio, Sasaki Junnosuke, et al., 59–94. Vol. 24 of Iwanami kōza: Nihon rekishi. Iwanami Shoten, 1975.Google Scholar

Asakawa, Kan’ichi. “Some Aspects of Japanese Feudal Institutions.” Transactions of the Asiatic Society of Japan 46, no. 1 (1918): 76–102.Google Scholar

Barbour, Violet. “Rigidities Affecting Business in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries.” American Economic Review 30, no. 1 (1940): 290–97.Google Scholar

Elison, George S. Deus Destroyed: The Image of Christianity in Early Modern Japan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Friday, Karl. “The Futile Paradigm: In Quest of Feudalism in Early Medieval Japan.” History Compass 8, no. 2 (2010): 179–96.Google Scholar

Goldstone, Jack A. “The Problem of the ‘Early Modern World.’” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 41, no. 3 (1998): 249–84.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hall, John Whitney. “The Castle Town and Japan’s Modern Urbanization.” Far Eastern Quarterly 15, no. 1 (November 1955): 37–56.Google Scholar

Hall, John Whitney. ed. Early Modern Japan. Vol. 4 of The Cambridge History of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Hall, John Whitney. Hall, John Whitney. “Introduction.” In Hall, Early Modern Japan, 1–39.Google Scholar

Hall, John Whitney, and Jansen, Marius B., eds. Studies in the Institutional History of Early Modern Japan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Howell, David L. “Nihon kinseishi to ārii modan hisutorii: Jidai kubun to hikakushi no kanōsei.” Kokushigaku 210 (June 2013): 98–122.Google Scholar

Keirstead, Thomas. “Inventing Medieval Japan: The History and Politics of National Identity.” Medieval History Journal 1, no. 1 (1998): 45–71.Google Scholar

Kishimoto, Mio. Higashi Ajia no “kinsei.” Yamakawa Shuppansha, 1998.Google Scholar

Miyakawa, Hisayuki. “An Outline of the Naitō Hypothesis and Its Effects on Japanese Studies of China.” Far Eastern Quarterly 14, no. 4 (August 1955): 533–52.Google Scholar

Miyazaki, Ichisada. “Tōyō no runesansu to seiyō no runesansu.” Shirin 25, no. 4 (1940): 465–80, and 26, no. 1 (1941): 69–102.Google Scholar

Naitō, Torajirō. Shina ron. Bunkaidō Shoten, 1914.Google Scholar

Ōtsu, Tōru, Sakurai, Eiji, Fujii, Jōji, Yoshida, Yutaka, and Ri, Sonshi (Lee, Sungsi), eds. Iwanami kōza: Nihon rekishi. 22 vols. Iwanami Shoten, 2013–16.Google Scholar

Pai, Hyung Il. Constructing “Korean” Origins: A Critical Review of Archaeology, Historiography, and Racial Myth in Korean State-Formation Theories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2000.Google Scholar

Palais, James B. “A Search for Korean Uniqueness.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 55, no. 2 (1995): 409–25.Google Scholar

Reischauer, Edwin O. “Japanese Feudalism.” In Feudalism in History, edited by Coulborn, Rushton, 26–48. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1956.Google Scholar

Sakamoto, Shōzō. “Edo jidai o ‘kinsei’ to iu koto.” Nihon rekishi 769 (June 2012): 105–14.Google Scholar

Seed, Patricia. “Early Modernity: The History of a Word.” CR: The New Centennial Review 2, no. 1 (Spring 2002): 1–16.Google Scholar

Smith, Thomas C. “Landlords and Rural Capitalists in the Modernization of Japan.” Journal of Economic History 16, no. 2 (June 1956): 165–81.CrossRef Google Scholar

Starn, Randolph. “The Early Modern Muddle.” Journal of Early Modern History 6, no. 3 (2002): 296–307.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tōkyō-to Nerima-ku. Nerima-ku shi. Nerima-ku, 1957.Google Scholar

Tōyama, Shigeki and Nagahara, Keiji. “Jidai kubun ron.” In Iwanami kōza: Nihon rekishi, edited by Ienaga Saburō, Ishimoda Shō, Inoue Kiyoshi, Inoue Mitsusada, Kitajima Masamoto, Kitayama Shigeo, Satō Shin’ichi, et al. Vol. 22, 165–226. Iwanami Shoten, 1963.Google Scholar

Uchida, Ginzō. Kinsei no Nihon. Fuzanbō, 1919. Reprint, Heibonsha, 1975.Google Scholar

Uchida, Ginzō. Nihon kinseishi. Fuzanbō, 1903.Google Scholar

Wakita, Osamu. “The Social and Economic Consequences of Unification.” Translated by McClain, James L.. In Hall, Early Modern Japan, 96–127.Google Scholar

Wigen, Kären. “Mapping Early Modernity: Geographical Meditations on a Comparative Concept.” Early Modern Japan 5, no. 2 (December 1995): 1–13.Google Scholar

Yanabu, Akira. Hon’yakugo seiritsu jijō. Iwanami Shoten, 1982.Google Scholar

Yang, Lien-Sheng. “Review of Chūgoku kinseishi (History of [early] modern China), by Naitō Torajirō, and Chūgoku shigakushi (History of Chinese historiography), by Naitō Torajirō.” Far Eastern Quarterly 12, no. 2 (February 1953): 208–10.Google Scholar

Book contents

Introduction

Summary

Keywords

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive