Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T14:39:05.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The history of early intervention for infants and young children with Down syndrome and their families

Where have we been and where are we going?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2011

By
Donna Spiker
Edited by
Jean-Adolphe Rondal ,
Juan Perera  and
Donna Spiker
Donna Spiker
Affiliation:
Center for Education and Human Services, SRI International
Jean-Adolphe Rondal
Affiliation:
Université de Liège, Belgium
Juan Perera
Affiliation:
Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca
Donna Spiker
Affiliation:
Stanford Research Institute International
Get access

Summary

Fifty years ago, early intervention (EI) for infants and young children with Down syndrome (DS) did not exist in any formalized or universal way. Beginning with a few experimental programs instigated by the advocacy of parents and the forward thinking of researchers, the field of EI for infants and young children with disabilities was born. Since then, steady progress and significant changes have occurred in the practice of EI. Many factors are influencing what we know and how we think about EI – changes in our understanding of and research about the development of infants and young children with DS, research on early development and learning more generally, and significant policy developments and changes in expectations about participation of persons with disabilities, including those with DS, in education and the community.

This chapter presents an overview of the history of EI, with a particular emphasis on EI for infants and young children with DS. The history includes summaries of: (1) the goals of EI for both the children and their families and how they have changed over the past 50 years; (2) research on the efficacy of EI as well as its actual implementation in practice; (3) how research in early childhood and early learning has in the past and will in the future affect the practice of EI; and (4) how research and policy developments concerning older children and adults with disabilities, including those with DS, are influencing the practice of EI. Conclusions about where we have been with research and policy developments are used to discuss implications for the future directions of the EI field.

Type
Chapter
Information
Neurocognitive Rehabilitation of Down Syndrome
Early Years
 , pp. 15 - 35
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, D. B., Jr., Bruder, M. B., Hebbeler, K., et al. (2006). Recommended outcomes for families of young children with disabilities. Journal of Early Intervention, 28(4), 227–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, D. B., McWilliam, R. A., Darkes, L. A., et al. (1998). Family outcomes in early intervention: a framework for program evaluation and efficacy research. Exceptional Children, 64, 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, D. B., Jr. & Powell, T. (2005). Assessing the information needs of families in early intervention. In Guralnick, M. J. (ed.), The Developmental Systems Approach to Early Intervention, pp. 151–183. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Bowman, B. T., Donovan, M. S., Burns, M. S. (eds.) (2001). Eager to Learn: Educating our Preschoolers. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Bricker, D. (2000). Inclusion: how the scene has changed. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20(1), 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruder, M. B. & Dunst, C. J. (1999). Expanding learning opportunities for infants and toddlers in natural environments: a chance to reconceptualize early intervention. Zero To Three, 20, 34–36.Google Scholar
Buysse, V. & Bailey, D. B. (1993). Behavioral and developmental outcomes in young children with disabilities in integrated and segregated settings: a review of comparative studies. Journal of Special Education, 26, 434–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, R. S. (1995). Language development in children and adolescents with Down syndrome. In Fletcher, P. & MacWhinney, B. (eds.), Handbook of Child Language, pp. 641–663. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clibbens, J. (2001). Signing and lexical development in children with Down syndrome. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 7, 101–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied Behavior Analysis (2nd edn.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Crnic, K. & Stormshak, E. (1997). The effectiveness of providing social support for families of children at risk. In Guralnick, M. J. (ed.), The Effectiveness of Early Intervention. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
,DEC/NAEYC. (2009). Early Childhood Inclusion: A joint position statement of the Division for Early Childhood (DEC) and the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute.Google Scholar
,Division for Early Childhood (DEC). (2007). Promoting Positive Outcomes for Children with Disabilities: Recommendations for Curriculum, Assessment, and Program Evaluation. Missoula, MT: Author.Google Scholar
Dunst, C. J., Bruder, M. B., Trivette, C. M., Hamby, D. W. (2006). Everyday activity settings, natural learning environments, and early intervention practices. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 3(1), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., Jodry, W. (1997). Influences of social support on children with disabilities and their families. In Guralnick, M. J. (ed.), The Effectiveness of Early Intervention. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Fewell, R. R. & Oelwin, P. L. (1991). Effective early intervention: results from the model preschool program for children with Down syndrome and other developmental delays. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 11, 56–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fidler, D. J. (2006). The emergence of a syndrome-specific personality profile in young children with Down syndrome. In Rondal, J. A. & Perera, J. (eds.), Down Syndrome, pp. 139–152. West Sussex: Wiley.Google ScholarPubMed
Fuchs, D. & Fuchs, L. (1994). Inclusive schools movement and the radicalization of special education reform. Exceptional Children, 60, 294–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, J. (2000). The beginnings of federal help for young children with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20(1), 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, W. I. (2006). Behavior Modification in Mental Retardation. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gibson, D. & Harris, A. (1988). Aggregated early intervention effects for Down's syndrome persons: patterning and longevity of benefits. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 32, 1–17.Google Scholar
Glenn, S., Dayus, B., Cunningham, C., Horgan, M. (2001). Mastery motivation in children with Down syndrome. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 7, 52–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guralnick, M. J. (ed.) (1997). The Effectiveness of Early Intervention. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Guralnick, M. J. (ed.) (2001). Early Childhood Inclusion. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Guralnick, M. J. (2005). Inclusion as a core principle in the early intervention system. In Guralnick, M. J. (ed.), The Developmental Systems Approach to Early Intervention, pp. 59–69. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Guralnick, M. J. & Bricker, D. (1987). The effectiveness of early intervention for children with cognitive and general developmental delays. In Guralnick, M. J. & Bennett, F. C. (eds.), The Effectiveness of Early Intervention for At-risk and Handicapped Children, pp. 115–173. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Guralnick, M. J., Neville, B., Hammond, M. A., Connor, R. T. (2008). Continuity and change from full-inclusion early childhood programs through the early elementary period. Journal of Early Intervention, 30(3), 237–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanson, M. J. (2003). Twenty-five years after early intervention. Infants and Young Children, 16(4), 354–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, B. & Risley, T. (1995). Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Hayden, A. H. & Dmitriev, V. (1975). The multidisciplinary preschool program for Down's syndrome children at the University of Washington model preschool center. In Friedlander, B. Z., Sterritt, G. M., Kirk, G. E. (eds.), Exceptional Infant. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
Hebbeler, K. & Barton, L. (2007). The need for data on child and family outcomes at the Federal and State levels. Young Exceptional Children Monograph Series, 9, 1–15.Google Scholar
Hebbeler, K., Barton, L., Mallik, S. (2008). Assessment and accountability for programs serving young children with disabilities. Exceptionality, 1(16), 48–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebbeler, K., Spiker, D., Bailey, D., et al. (2007). Early intervention for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families: Participants, services, and outcomes. Final Report of the National Early Intervention Longitudinal Study (NEILS). Menlo Park: SRI International.Google Scholar
Hebbeler, K., Spiker, D., Morrison, K., Mallik, S. (2008). A national look at the characteristics of Part C early intervention services. Young Exceptional Children Monograph Series No. 10.
Hemmeter, M. L. (2000). Classroom-based interventions: evaluating the past and looking toward the future. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20(1), 56–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepburn, S. L. (2003). Clinical implications of temperamental characteristics of young children with developmental disabilities. Infants and Young Children, 16, 59–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kasari, C., Freeman, S., Mundy, P., Sigman, M. D. (1995). Attention regulation by children with Down syndrome: coordinated joint attention and social referencing looks. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 100, 128–136.Google ScholarPubMed
Kelly, J. F., Booth-LaForce, C., Spieker, S. J. (2005). Assessing family characteristics relevant to early intervention. In Guralnick, M. J. (ed.), The Developmental Systems Approach to Early Intervention, pp. 235–265. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. F., Zuckerman, T., Rosenblatt, S. (2008). Promoting first relationships: a relationship-focused early intervention approach. Infants and Young Children, 21, 285–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. & Mahoney, G. (2004). The effects of mother's style of interaction on children's engagement: Implications for using responsive interventions with parents. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 24, 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koegel, R. L. & Koegel, L. K. (2006). Pivotal Response Treatments for Autism. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Landry, S. H., Miller-Loncar, C. L., Swank, P. R. (1998). Goal-directed behavior in children with Down syndrome: the role of joint play situations. Early Education & Development, 9, 264–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linn, M. I., Goodman, J. F., Lender, W. L. (2000). Played out? Passive behavior by children with Down syndrome during unstructured play. Journal of Early Intervention, 23, 264–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, G., Boyce, G., Fewell, R. R., Spiker, D., Wheeden, C. A. (1998). The relationship of parent-child interaction to the effectiveness of early intervention services for at-risk children and children with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 18, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, G. & Perales, F. (2003). Using relationship-focused intervention to enhance the social-emotional functioning of young children with autism spectrum disorders. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 23(2), 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, G. & Perales, F. (2005). Relationship-focused intervention with children with pervasive developmental disorders and other disabilities: a comparative study. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 26, 77–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markowitz, J., Carlson, E., Frey, W., et al. (2006). Preschool with Disabilities: Wave 1 Overview Report from the Pre-Elementary Education Longitudinal Study (PEELS). Washington: Institute for Education Sciences.Google Scholar
McCathren, R. B., Yoder, P. J., Warren, S. F. (1995). The role of directives in early language intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 19, 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLanahan, S. (2005). School readiness: closing racial and ethnic gaps. The Future of Children, 15(1).Google Scholar
McLean, M., Wolery, M., Bailey, D. B., Jr. (2004). Assessing Infants and Preschoolers with Special Needs (3rd edn.), Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
McWilliam, R. A. (2005). Assessing the resource needs of families in the context of early intervention. In Guralnick, M. J. (ed.), The Developmental Systems Approach to Early Intervention, pp. 215–233. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
,National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) & National Association of Early Childhood Specialists (NAECS) in State Departments of Education. (2003). Where We Stand on Curriculum, Assessment, and Program Evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.naeyc.org/about/positions/pdf/StandlCurrAss.pdf.
,National Education Goals Panel. (1997). Special Early Childhood Report 1997. Washington: Author.Google Scholar
,National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2000). From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Niccols, A., Atkinson, L., Pepler, D. (2003). Mastery motivation in young children with Down's syndrome: relationship with cognitive and adaptive competence. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47(2), 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orsmond, G. I. (2005). Assessing interpersonal and family distress and threats to confident parenting in the context of early intervention. In Guralnick, M. J. (ed.), The Developmental Systems Approach to Early Intervention, pp. 185–213. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Ramruttun, B. & Jenkins, C. (1998). Prelinguistic communication and Down syndrome. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 5, 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roper, N. & Dunst, C. J. (2003). Communication interventions in natural environments: guidelines for practice. Infants and Young Children, 16, 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rynders, J. & Horrobin, J. (1975). Project EDGE: a communication stimulation program for Down's syndrome infants. In Friedland, B., Steritt, G., Kirk, G. (eds.), Exceptional Infant: Assessment and Intervention, pp. 173–192. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
Rynders, J. E. & Horrobin, J. M. (1990). Always trainable? Never educable? Updating educational expectations concerning children with Down syndrome. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 95, 77–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Rynders, J. E., Spiker, D., Horrobin, J. (1978). Underestimating the educability of Down's syndrome children: examination of methodological problems in recent literature. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 82, 440–448.Google ScholarPubMed
Scarborough, A. A., Hebbeler, K. M., Spiker, D. (2006). Eligibility characteristics of infants and toddlers entering early intervention in the United States. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 3(1), 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarborough, A., Spiker, D., Mallik, S., et al. (2004). Who are the children and families receiving early intervention services? Exceptional Children, 70, 469–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. F. & Berg, J. M. (1976). Down's Anomaly (2nd edn.). New York: Longman Group Limited.Google Scholar
Spiker, D. (2006). Off to a good start: early interventions for infants and young children with Down syndrome and their families. In Rondal, J. A. & Perera, J. (eds.), Down Syndrome: Neurobehavioral Specificity, pp. 176–190. West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
Spiker, D., Boyce, G., Boyce, L. (2002). Parent-child interactions when infants and young children have disabilities. In Gidden, L. (ed.), International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, Vol. 25, pp. 35–70. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Spiker, D., Hebbeler, K., Mallik, S. (2005). Developing and implementing early intervention programs for children with established disabilities. In Guralnick, M. J. (ed.), The Developmental Systems Approach to Early Intervention, pp. 305–349. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Spiker, D. & Hopmann, M. R. (1997). The effectiveness of early intervention for children with Down Syndrome. In Guralnick, M. J. (ed.), The Effectiveness of Early Intervention, pp. 271–306. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Turnbull, A. P., Turbiville, V., Turnbull, H. R. (2000). Evolution of family-professional partnerships: collective empowerment as the model for the early twenty-first century. In Shonkoff, J. P. & Meisels, S. J. (eds.), Handbook of Early Childhood Intervention (2nd edn.), pp. 630–650. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, L. J., Salisbury, C. L., Strain, P., McCormick, C., Tessier, A. (1990). A behavioral-ecological approach to early intervention: focus on cultural diversity. In Meisels, S. J. & Shonkoff, J. P. (eds.), Handbook of Early Childhood Intervention, pp. 173–195. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., Levine, P. (2005). Changes Over Time in the Early Postschool Outcomes of Youth with Disabilities. Menlo Park: SRI International.Google Scholar
Walker, D., Bigelow, K. M., Harjusola-Webb, S. (2008). Increasing communication and language-learning opportunities for infants and toddlers. Young Exceptional Children Monograph Series No. 10, 105–121.Google Scholar
Warren, S. F. (2000). The future of early communication and language intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wishart, J. (1993). The development of learning difficulties in children with Down's syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 37, 389–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wishart, J. (1996). Learning in young children with Down syndrome: developmental trends. In Rondal, J. A. & Perera, J. (eds.), Down Syndrome: Psychological, Psychobiological, and Socio-educational Perspectives, pp. 81–96. London: Whurr.Google Scholar
Wishart, J. (2001). Motivation and learning styles in young children with Down syndrome. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 7, 47–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolery, M. (2000). Behavioral and educational approaches to early intervention. In Shonkoff, J. P. & Meisels, S. J. (eds.), Handbook of Early Childhood Intervention (2nd edn.), pp. 179–203. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolery, M. & Wilbers, J. S. (eds.). (1994). Including Children with Special Needs in Early Childhood Programs. Washington: National Association for the Education of Young Children.Google Scholar
Yoder, P. J. & Warren, S. F. (2004). Early predictors of language in children with and without Down syndrome. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 109, 285–300.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×