We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Abi-Saab, Georges, “Fragmentation or Unification: Some Concluding Remarks” (1999) 31New York University Journal of International Law and Politics4: 919–934.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce, “The Rise of World Constitutionalism” (1997) 83Virginia Law Review4: 771-797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ager, Sheila L., “Treaties, Archaic and Classical Greece,” in Bagnall, Roger S. et al. (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Ancient History (1st ed.) (Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing, 2013), 6837–6838.Google Scholar
Ago, Roberto, “The Concept of ‘International Community as a Whole’: A Guarantee to the Notion of State Crimes,” in Weiler, Joseph H. H., Cassese, Antonio, and Spinedi, Marina (eds.), International Crimes of State – A Critical Analysis of the ILC’s Draft Article 19 on State Responsibility (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1989), 252–253.Google Scholar
Alexandrov, Stanimir A., “The Compulsory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice: How Compulsory Is It?” (2006) 5Chinese Journal of International Law1: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, Robert, “Hans Kelsens Begriff des Relativen Apriori,” in Alexy, Robert et al. (eds.), Neukantianismus und Rechtsphilosophie (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2002), 179–202.Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert, “On the Concept and the Nature of Law” (2008) 21Ratio Juris3: 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, Robert, “Law, Morality, and the Existence of Human Rights” (2012) 25Ratio Juris1: 2–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aljaghoub, Mahasen M., The Advisory Function of the International Court of Justice: 1946−2005 (Heidelberg: Springer, 2006).Google Scholar
Altman, Amnon, Tracing the Earliest Recorded Concepts of International Law – The Ancient Near East (2500–330 BCE) (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, José E., International Organizations as Law-makers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Anaya, S. James, Indigenous Peoples in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Andenas, Mads and Bjorge, Eirik, “Introduction: From Fragmentation to Convergence in International Law,” in Andenas, Mads and Bjorge, Eirik (eds.), A Farewell to Fragmentation – Reassertion and Convergence in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, , Rhetoric (translated by John Henry Freese) (London: William Heinemann and G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1926), Book I.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Politics (translated, with introduction and notes, by C. D. C. Reeve) (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1998).Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Nicomachean Ethics (translated, with an interpretative essay, notes, and glossary by Robert C. Bartlett and Susan D. Collins) (Chicago:The University of Chicago Press, 2011), Book V.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, David R., “Globalizing Jeremy Bentham” (2011) 32History of Political Thought1: 63–82.Google Scholar
Asamoah, Obed Y., The Legal Significance of the Declarations of the General Assembly of the United Nations (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, John, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (edited by Rumble, Wilfrid E.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banaś, Paweł, “The Philosophy of Legal Philosophy: An Introduction,” in Banaś, Paweł, Dyrda, Adam and Gizbert-Studnicki, Tomasz (eds.), Metaphilosophy of Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016), 1–8.Google Scholar
Barboza, Julio, “Legal Injury: The Tip of the Iceberg in the Law of State Responsibility,” in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), International Responsibility Today – Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005), 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, Richard R., “International Law in ‘Her Infinite Variety’” (1980) 29International and Comparative Law Quarterly4: 549–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaulac, Stéphane, The Power of Language in the Making of International Law – The Word Sovereignty in Bodin and Vattel and the Myth of Westpahila (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2004).Google Scholar
Beckett, Jason A., “The Hartian Tradition in International Law” (2008) The Journal Jurisprudence: 51–83.Google Scholar
Bederman, David J., International Law in Antiquity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bederman, David J., Custom as a Source of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy, “Anarchical Fallacies,” in The Works of Jeremy Bentham, Vol. 2 (edited by SirBowring, John ) (Edinburgh: William Tait, 1843), 483–534.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy, A Fragment on Government (with an introduction by F.C. Montague) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1891).Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1780/1789) (Kitchener: Batoche Books, 2000).Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, “Customary International Law as a Judicial Tool for Promoting Efficiency,” in Benvenisti, Eyal and Hirsh, Moshe (eds.), The Impact of International Law on International Cooperation – Theoretical Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 85–116.Google Scholar
Berman, FranklinSir, “The International Court of Justice as an ‘Agent’ of Legal Development,” in Tams, Christian J. and Sloan, James (eds.), The Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “The Authority of International Law – Lifting the State Veil” (2009) 31Sydney Law Review3: 343–380.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “Theorizing the Sources of International Law,” in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 164–185.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “International Judges as Dispute-Settlers and Law Enforcers: From International Law without Courts to International Courts without Law” (2011). 34Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review1: 33–52.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “Sovereignty, International Law and Democracy” (2011) 22European Journal of International Law2: 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “Sovereignty,” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha and d’Aspremont, Jean, “The Sources of International Law – Introduction,” in Besson, Samantha and D’Aspremont, Jean (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on the Sources of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John, “Introduction,” in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 1–32.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Andrea, “Human Rights and the Magic of Jus Cogens” (2008) 19European Journal of International Law3: 491–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bix, Brian H., “Ideals, Practices, and Concepts in Legal Theory,” in Beltrán, Jordi Ferrer, Moreso, José Juan, and Papayannis, Diego M. (eds.), Neutrality and Theory of Law (Dordrecht: Springer, 2013), 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bix, Brian, “Kelsen and Normativity Revisited,” at ssrn.com/abstract=2287870 (Published in Spanish, Bix, Brian H., “De Nuevo sobre Kelsen y la normatividad,” in Bernal, Carlos and Porciuncula, Marcelo (eds.), Kelsen para erizos. Ensayos en honor a Stanley L. Paulson (Bogota: Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2017), 273–296).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bix, Brian, “The Nature of Legal Obligation,” in Himma, Kenneth Einar, Jovanović, Miodrag, and Spaić, Bojan (eds.), Unpacking Normativity: Conceptual, Normative, and Descriptive Issues (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2018).Google Scholar
Bluntschli, Johann Caspar, Das moderne Volkerrecht der civilisirten Staaten als Rechtsbuch dargestellt (Nordlingen: Druck und Verlag der C.H. Beck’schen Buckhandlung, 1872).Google Scholar
Bos, Maarten, “The Recognized Manifestations of International Law” (1977) 20German Year Book of International Law, 9–76.Google Scholar
Bos, Maarten, “The Identification of Custom in International Law” (1982) 25German Yearbook of International Law: 9–53.Google Scholar
Bothe, Michael, “Legal and Non-Legal Norms – A Meaningful Distinction in International Relations?” (1980) 11Netherlands Yearbook of International Law: 65–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brake, Elizabeth, Minimizing Marriage – Marriage, Morality, and the Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockmöller, Annette, Die Entstehung der Rechtstheorie im 19. Jahrhundert in Deutschland (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1997).Google Scholar
Bross, Siegfried, “Reflections on the Execution of Constitutional Court Decisions in a Democratic State under the Rule of Law on the Basis of the Constitutional Law Situation in the Federal Republic of Germany” (2009), European Commission for Democracy through Law, CDL- JU(2009)001, at www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-JU(2009)001-eGoogle Scholar
Brown, Bartram S., “Human Rights, Sovereignty, and the Final Status of Kosovo” (2005) 80Chicago-Kent Law Review3: 235–272.Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian, “The Reality and Efficacy of International Law” (1981) 51British Yearbook of International Law: 1–8.Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian, “International Law at the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nations,” The Rule of Law in International Affairs: International Law at the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nations (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1998).Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen, “Reforming the International Law of Humanitarian Intervention,” in Holzgrefe, J. L. and Jeohane, Robert E. (eds.), Humanitarian Intervention – Ethical, Legal and Political Dilemmas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 130–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Allen, “The Legitimacy of International Law,” in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 79–96.Google Scholar
Buerganthal, Thomas, “Proliferation of International Courts and Tribunals: Is It Good or Bad?” (2001) 14Leiden Journal of International Law2: 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulygin, Eugenio, “An Antinomy in Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law,” in Paulson, Stanley L. and Paulson, Bonnie Litschewski (eds.), Normativity and Norms – Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998), 297–315.Google Scholar
Burazin, Luka, “Can There Be an Artifact Theory of Law?” (2016) 29Ratio Juris3: 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, Tony, Aristotle and Natural Law (London: Continuum International Publishing, 2011).Google Scholar
Bustamante, Thomas, “Revisiting Dworkin’s Philosophy of International Law: Could the Hedgehog Have Done It Any Other Way?” (2017) 30Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence2: 259–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butt, Daniel, Rectifying International Injustice – Principles of Compensation and Restitution Between Nations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Çali, Bașak, “On Interpretivism and International Law” (2009) 20European Journal of International Law3: 805–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çali, Başak, The Authority of International Law – Obedience, Respect, and Rebuttal (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trindade, Cançado, Judge, Antônio A., The Construction of a Humanized International Law: A Collection of Individual Opinions (1991–2013), Vol. 3 (Brill: Leiden, 2017).Google Scholar
Capps, Patrick, Human Dignity and the Foundations of International Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf, Hahn, Hans and Neurath, Otto (eds.) Logischer Empirismus – der Wiener Kreis. Ausgewählte Texte mit einer Einleitung (München: Fink, 1975).Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, Self-determination of Peoples: A Legal Reappraisal (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, “Ex iniuria ius oritur: Are We Moving towards International Legitimation of Forcible Humanitarian Countermeasures in the World Community?” (1999) 10European Journal of International Law1: 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, International Law (2nd ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, “The Nicaragua and Tadić Tests Revisited in Light of the ICJ Judgment on Genocide in Bosnia” (2007) 18European Journal of International Law4: 649−668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, “For an Enhanced Role of Jus Cogens,” in Cassese, Antonio (ed.), Realizing Utopia – The Future of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 158–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castaneda, Jorge, Legal Effects of United Nations Resolutions (New York: Columbia University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Cheng, Bin, Studies in International Space Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Chesterman, Simon, Johnstone, Ian and Malone, David M., Law and Practice of the United Nations – Documents and Commentary (2nd ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiassoni, Pierluigi, “Supporting The Force of Law: A Few Complementary Arguments Against Essentialist Jurisprudence,” in Bezemek, Christoph and Ladavac, Nicoletta (eds.), The Force of Law Reaffirmed – Frederick Schauer Meets the Critics (Cham: Springer, 2016), 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Adam S., “A Reply to Dworkin’s New Theory of International Law” (2013) 80The University of Chicago Law Review Dialogue: 105–115.Google Scholar
Chinkin, Christine M., “The Challenge of Soft Law: Development and Change in International Law” (1989) 38International and Comparative Law Quarterly4: 850–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, Thomas, “Ronald Dworkin, State Consent, and Progressive Cosmopolitanism,” in Waluchow, Wil and Sciaraffa, Stefan (eds.), The Legacy of Ronald Dworkin (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicero, , On the Commonwealth and On the Laws (edited by Zetzel, James E. G.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia, The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages: Stoicism in Classical Latin Literature (Leiden: Brill Publishers, 1985).Google Scholar
Collins, Richard, “Classical Legal Positivism in International Law Revisited,” in Kammerhofer, Jörg and D’Aspremont, Jean (eds.), International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Richard, The Institutional Problem in Modern International Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016).Google Scholar
Commager, Henry Steel and Cantor, Milton (eds.), Documents of American History (since 1898), Vol. II (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1988).Google Scholar
Conforti, Benedetto, The Law and Practice of the United Nations (3rd revised ed.) (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005).Google Scholar
Cottier, Thomas, Equitable Principles of Maritime Boundary Delimitation: The Quest for Distributive Justice in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, James R., The Creation of States in International Law (2nd ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, James, State Responsibility: The General Part (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, James and Nicholson, Rowan, “The Continued Relevance of Established Rules and Institutions Relating to the Use of Force,” in Weller, Marc, Solomou, Alexia, and Rylatt, Jake William (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 96–113.Google Scholar
Culver, Keith and Giudice, Michael, Legality’s Borders: An Essay in General Jurisprudence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumings, Bruce, Korea’s Place in the Sun: A Modern History (New York: W.W. Norton, 2005).Google Scholar
Dahlman, Christian, “The Function of Opinio Juris in Customary International Law” (2012) 81Nordic Journal of International Law3: 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Amato, Anthony, “The Neo-Positivist Concept of International Law” (1965) 59American Journal of International Law: 321–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Amato, Anthony, “It’s a Bird, It’s a Plane, It’s a Jus Cogens!” (1990) 6Connecticut Journal of International Law1: 1–6.Google Scholar
Darcy, Shane, Judges, Law and War: The Judicial Development of International Humanitarian Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d’Aspremont, Jean, “Softness in International Law: A Self-Serving Quest for New Legal Materials” (2008) 19European Journal of International Law5: 1075–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d’Aspremont, Jean, Formalism and the Sources of International Law – A Theory of the Ascertainment of Legal Rules (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, Jean and Aalberts, Taanja, “Which Future for the Scholarly Concept of Soft International Law? Editors’ Introductory Remarks” (2012) 25Leiden Journal of International Law2: 309–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d’Aspremont, Jean, “Bindingness” (2015) ACIL Research Paper 2015–19, at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2690155, 1. (forthcoming in d’Aspremont, Jean and Singh, Sahib (eds.), Concepts for International Law ‐ Contributions to Disciplinary Thought (London: Edward Elgar, 2019).Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, Jean, “The Decay of Modern Customary International Law in Spite of Scholarly Heroism” (2015) The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence:9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d’Aspremont, Jean, “The Doctrine of Fundamental Rights of States and the Functions of Anthropomorphic Thinking in International Law” (2015) 4Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law3: 501–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delacroix, Sylvie, Legal Norms and Normativity – An Essay in Genealogy (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006).Google Scholar
den Heijer, Maarten and van der Wilt, Harmen, “Jus Cogens and the Humanization and Fragmentation of International Law” (2015) 46Netherlands Yearbook of International Law: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deplano, Rosanna, The Strategic Use of International Law by the United Nations Security Council – An Empirical Study (Cham: Springer, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desta, Melaku Geboye, “Soft Law in International Law: An Overview,” in Bjorklund, Andrea K. and Reinisch, August (eds.), International Investment Law and Soft Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012), 39–50.Google Scholar
de Vattel, Emmerich, The Law of Nations; Or Principles of the Law of Nature Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns (Philadelphia: T& J. W. Johnson Law Booksellers, 1844).Google Scholar
Dickson, Julie, Evaluation and Legal Theory (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001).Google Scholar
Dickson, Julie, “Is Bad Law Still Law? Is Bad Law Really Law?,” in Del Mar, Maksymilian and Bankowski, Zenon (eds.), Law as Institutional Normative Order (Farnham: Ashgate, 2009), 161–183.Google Scholar
Dickson, Julie, “Ours is a Broad Church: Indirectly Evaluative Legal Philosophy as a Facet of Jurisprudential Inquiry” (2015) 6Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought2: 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, “The Thirteenth Waldemar A. Solf Lecture in International Law” (2000) 166Military Law Review: 93–108.Google Scholar
Divac Öberg, Marko, “The Legal Effects of Resolutions of the UN Security Council and General Assembly in the Jurisprudence of the ICJ” (2005) 16European Journal of International Law5: 879–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Rosalind and Stone, Adrienne (eds.), The Invisible Constitution in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörr, Oliver, “Article 31,” in Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary(Heidelberg:, Springer, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droubi, Sufyan, Resisting United Nations Security Council Resolutions (London: Routledge, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte D’Almeida, Luís, “Legal Statements and Normative Language” (2011) 30Law and Philosophy2: 167–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, “International Law: Torn between Coexistence, Cooperation and Globalization. General Conclusions” (1998) 9European Journal of International Law2: 278–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, “The Place and Role of Unilateralism in Contemporary International Law” (2000) 11European Journal of International Law1: 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, “Hart’s Postscript and the Character of Legal Philosophy” (2004) 24Oxford Journal of Legal Studies1: 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Is Democracy Possible Here? Principles for a New Political Debate (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Justice in Robes (Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Justice for Hedgehogs (Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, “A New Philosophy for International Law” (2013) 41Philosophy and Public Affairs1: 2–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagleton, Clyde, “Covenant of the League of Nations and Charter of the United Nations: Points of Difference” (1945) 13The Department of State Bulletin321: 263–269.Google Scholar
Eaton, Jonah, “An Emerging Norm – Determining the Meaning and Legal Status of the Responsibility to Protect” (2011) 32Michigan Journal of International Law4: 765–804.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, Kenneth M., “Defending the Possibility of a Neutral Functional Theory of Law” (2009) 29Oxford Journal of Legal Studies1: 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenberg, Kenneth, “Critical Reception of Raz’s Theory of Authority” (2011) 6Philosophy Compass11: 777–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenberg, Kenneth, “Joseph Raz’s Theory of Authority” (2011) 6Philosophy Compass12: 884–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenberg, Kenneth M., The Functions of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, Eugene, Die juristische Logik (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1918).Google Scholar
Eng, Svein, “Fusion of Descriptive and Normative Propositions. The Concepts of ‘Descriptive Proposition’ and ‘Normative Proposition’ as Concepts of Degree” (2000) 13Ratio Juris3: 236–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esakov, Gennady, “International Criminal Law and Russia: From ‘Nuremberg’ Passion to ‘The Hague’ Prejudice” (2017) 69Europe-Asia Studies8: 1184–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estreicher, Samuel, “Rethinking the Binding Effect of Customary International Law” (2003) 44Virginia Journal of International Law1: 5–17.Google Scholar
Fassbender, Bardo, The United Nations Charter as the Constitution of the International Community (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, Andreas and Teubner, Gunther, “Regime Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law” (2004) 25Michigan Journal of International Law4: 999–1046.Google Scholar
Focarelli, Carlo, International Law as Social Construct – The Struggle for Global Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., “Lessons of Kosovo” (1999) 93American Journal of International Law4: 857–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, Wolfgang, The Changing Structure of International Law (New York: Columbia University Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Finnis, John, “Grounds of Law and Legal Theory: A Response” (2007) 13Legal Theory3–4: 315–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, John, “Marriage: A Basic and Exigent Good” (2008) 91Monist3–4: 388–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis., John, Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Finnis, John, Philosophy of Law: Collected Essays Volume IV (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, John, “Revolutions and Continuity of Law,” in Philosophy of Law: Collected Essays Volume IV (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 407–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Gerald G., Special Rapporteur, “Second Report on the Law of Treaties” (1957) Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol. II.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Gerald G.Sir, “Some Problems Regarding the Formal Sources of International Law,” in van Asbek, Frederick Mari (ed.), Symbolae Verzijl (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1958), 153–186.Google Scholar
Frowein, Jochen Abraham, “Jus Cogens,” in Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. 7 (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1984).Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis, The Origins of Political Order – From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011).Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon, Legal Fictions (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L., The Morality of Law (revised ed.) (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Gagarin, Michael and Woodruff, Paul, “Early Greek Legal Thought,” in Miller, Fred D.Jr. and Biondi, Carrie-Ann (eds.), A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence Vol. 6 – A History of the Philosophy of Law from the Ancient Greeks to the Scholastics (Heidelberg: Springer, 2007), 7–34.Google Scholar
García-Salmones Rovira, Mónica, The Project of Positivism in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, John, “Legal Positivism: 5½ Myths” (2001) 46The American Journal of Jurisprudence1: 199–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, John, Law as a Leap of Faith (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, John, “Why Law Might Emerge: Hart’s Problematic Fable,” in d’Almeida, Luís Duarte, Edwards, James, and Dolcetti, Andrea (eds.), Reading HLA Hart’s ‘The Concept of Law’ (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013), 81–96.Google Scholar
Garibaldi, Oscar M., “The Legal Status of General Assembly Resolutions: Some Conceptual Observations” (1979) 73Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law):324–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garlicki, Lech, “Constitutional Courts versus Supreme Courts” (2007) 5International Journal of Constitutional Law1: 44–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Paul, The Philosophy of Nationalism (Boulder: Westview Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Giudice, Michael, “Hart and Kelsen on International Law,” in Green, Leslie and Leiter, Brian (eds.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law, Vol. 2 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 148–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giudice, Michael, Understanding the Nature of Law: A Case for Constructive Conceptual Explanation (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giudice, Michael, “Sources and the Systematicity of International Law – A Philosophical Perspective,” in Besson, Samantha and D’Aspremont, Jean (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on the Sources of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 583–603.Google Scholar
Glennon, Michael J., “How International Rules Die” (2005) 93Georgetown Law Journal3: 939–991.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack and Levinson, Daryl, “Law for States: International Law, Constitutional Law, Public Law” (2009) 122Harvard Law Review7: 1791–1868.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L. and Posner, Eric A., The Limits of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Camille, “Acta Sunt Servanda? A Regime for Regulating the Unilateral Acts of States at International Law” (2006) 25Australian Year Book of International Law: 43–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodrich, Leland M., “From League of Nations to United Nations” (1947) 1International Organization1: 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabowski, Andrzej, Juristic Concept of the Validity of Statutory Law – A Critique of Contemporary Legal Nonpositivism (Heidelberg: Springer, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graebner, Norman A. and Bennett, Edward M., The Versailles Treaty and Its Legacy – The Failure of the Wilsonian Vision (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Green, James A., The Persistent Objector Rule in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Green, Leslie, “The Morality in Law,” in d’Almeida, Luís Duarte, Edwards, James, and Dolcetti, Andrea (eds.), Reading HLA Hart’s ‘The Concept of Law’ (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013), 177–209.Google Scholar
Green, Leslie, “The Forces of Law: Duty, Coercion and Power” (2016) 29Ratio Juris2: 164–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Mark, “How to Explain Things with Force” (2016) 129Harvard Law Review7: 1932–1979.Google Scholar
Greenwood, ChristopherSir, “Unity and Diversity in International Law,” in Andenas, Mads and Bjorge, Eirik (eds.), A Farewell to Fragmentation – Reassertion and Convergence in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Leo, “The Peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948” (1948) 42American Journal of International Law1: 20–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grotius, Hugo, The Rights of War and Peace (edited and with an Introduction by Tuck, Richard) (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005), Prolegomena to the first edition of De Iure Belli ac Pacis, 1746.Google Scholar
Gruchalla-Wesierski, Tadeusz, “A Framework for Understanding ‘Soft Law’” (1984) 30McGill Law Journal1: 37–88.Google Scholar
Guastini, Riccardo, “A Realistic View on Law and Legal Cognition” (2015) 27Revus – Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law: 45–54.Google Scholar
Guastini, Riccardo, “Preface,” in Ávila, Humberto, Certainty in Law (Basel: Springer, 2016), v–ix.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T., How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallpike, Christopher Robert, On Primitive Society: And Other Forbidden Topics (Bloomington: Author House, 2011).Google Scholar
Hampton, James A., “The Role of Similarity in Natural Categorization,” in Hahn, Ulrike and Ramscar, Michael (eds.), Similarity and Categorization (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harnad, Steven, “To Cognize Is to Categorize: Cognition Is Categorization,” in Cohen, Henry and Lefebvre, Claire (eds.), Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005), 20–45.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom, Social Being (Oxford: Blackwell, 1979).Google Scholar
Harrison, Ross, “The Equal Extent of Natural and Civil Law,” in Dyzenhaus, David and Poole, Thomas (eds.), Hobbes and The Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Herbert L. A., “Are There Any Natural Rights?” (1955) 64The Philosophical Review2: 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Herbert, “Analytical Jurisprudence in Mid-twentieth Century: A Reply to Professor Bodeheimer” (1957) 105University of Pennsylvania Law Review: 953–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Herbert, “Kelsen Visited” (1963) 10UCLA Law Review4: 709–728.Google Scholar
Hart, Herbert L. A., “Commands and Authoritative Reasons,” in Essays on Bentham (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982), 243–268.Google Scholar
Hart, Herbert L. A., Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Herbert, The Concept of Law (with an Introduction by Leslie Green, 3rd ed.) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Herbert, “Answers to Eight Questions,” in Duarte d’Almeida, Luís, Edwards, James, and Dolcetti, Andrea (eds.), Reading HLA Hart’s ‘The Concept of Law’ (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013), 279–297.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona and Shapiro, Scott J., “Outcasting: Enforcement in Domestic and International Law” (2011) 121The Yale Law Journal2:252–348.Google Scholar
Hehir, Aidan, Humanitarian Intervention – An Introduction (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).Google Scholar
Heinsch, Robert, Die Weiterentwicklung des humanitären Völkerrechts durch die Strafgerichtshöfe für das ehemalige Jugoslawien und Ruanda (Zur Bedeutung von internationalen Gerichtsentscheidungen als Rechtsquelle des Völkerstrafrechts) (Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2007).Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis, How Nations Behave (New York: Columbia University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis, “Kosovo and the Law of ‘Humanitarian Intervention’” (1999) 93American Journal of International Law4: 824–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herren, Madeleine, “International Organizations, 1865–1945,” in Cogan, Jacob Katz, Hurd, Ian, and Johnstone, Ian (eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Organizations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 91–112.Google Scholar
Hershey, Amos S., “The History of International Relations during Antiquity and the Middle Ages” (1911) 5American Journal of International Law4: 901–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, “The International Court of Justice: Selected Issues of State Responsibility,” in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), International Responsibility Today – Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005), 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillier, Tim, Sourcebook on Public International Law (London: Cavendish Publishing Limited, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilpold, Peter, “The EU Law and the UN Law in Conflict: The Kadi Case” (2009) 13Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law: 141–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himma, Kenneth Einar, “Do Philosophy and Sociology Mix? A Non-Essentialist Socio-Legal Positivist Analysis of the Concept of Law” (2004) 24Oxford Journal of Legal Studies4: 717–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himma, Kenneth Einar, “Final Authority to Bind with Moral Mistakes: On the Explanatory Potential of Inclusive Legal Positivism” (2005) 24Law and Philosophy1: 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himma, Kenneth Einar, “Conceptual Jurisprudence: An Introduction to Conceptual Analysis and Methodology in Legal Theory” (2015) 26Revus – Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law: 65–92.Google Scholar
Himma, Kenneth Einar, “The Authorization of Coercive Enforcement Mechanisms as a Conceptually Necessary Feature of Law” (2016) 7Jurisprudence3: 593–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himma, Kenneth Einar, “Authority,” in Bongiovanni, Giorgio et al. (eds.), Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation (Dordrecht: Springer, 2018), 191–217.Google Scholar
Hobe, Stephan, “Evolution of the Principle on Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources: From Soft Law to a Customary Law Principle?,” in Bungenberg, Marc and Hobe, Stephan (eds.), Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources (Cham: Springer, 2015).Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb, Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning and Other Legal Essays (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1919).Google Scholar
Huneeus, Alexandra V., “Compliance with International Court Judgments and Decisions,” in Alter, Karen J., Romano, Cesare, and Shany, Yuval (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 437–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Alan, Governance of Consumer Passions: A History of Sumptuary Law (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, Heide M., Moral Combat (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew, “International Law and the Making and Unmaking of Boundaries,” in Buchanan, Allen and Moore, Margaret (eds.), States, Nations, and Borders: The Ethics of Making Boundaries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, The Responsibility to Protect (Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 2001).Google Scholar
Itzkowitz, Norman, Ottoman Empire and Islamic Tradition (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Jabloner, Clemens and Stadler, Friedrich (eds.), Logischer Empirismus und Reine Rechtslehre –Beziehungen zwischen dem Wiener Kreis und der Hans Kelsen-Schule (Wien: Springer, 2001).Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank, From Metaphysics to Ethics – A Defence of Conceptual Analysis (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Janis, M. W., “Jeremy Bentham and the Fashioning of ‘International Law’” (1984) 78American Journal of International Law2: 405–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jellinek, Georg, Ein Verfassungsgericht für Österreich (Wien: Alfred Hölder, 1885).Google Scholar
Jellinek, Georg, Allgemeine Staatslehre (Berlin: Verlag von Julius Springer, 1929).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, Robert and Watts, Arthur (eds.), Oppenheim’s International Law: Volume 1 Peace (9th ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeutner, Valentin, Irresolvable Norm Conflicts in International Law: The Concept of a Legal Dilemma (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanović, Miodrag, Constitutionalizing Secession in Federalized States: A Procedural Approach (Utrecht: Eleven Publishing International, 2007).Google Scholar
Jovanović, Miodrag, “Is Kosovo and Metohija Indeed a ‘Unique Case’?”, in Summers, James (ed.), Kosovo: A Precedent? The Declaration of Independence, the Advisory Opinion and Implications for Statehood, Self-Determination and Minority Rights (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011), 345–374.Google Scholar
Jovanović, Miodrag, Collective Rights – A Legal Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanović, Miodrag, “Dworkin on International Law: Not Much of a Legacy?” (2015) 28Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence2: 443–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanović, Miodrag, “Is Legal Positivism Tenable Beyond Moral Relativism?” (2015) 9Problema – Anuario de Filosofia y Teoría del Derecho:193–252.Google Scholar
Jovanović, Miodrag, “Responsibility to Protect and the International Rule of Law” (2015) 14Chinese Journal of International Law4: 757–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanović, Miodrag, “Theorizing ‘Unidentified Normative Objects’ of Global Regulatory Regimes,” in Himma, , Jovanović, , and Spaić, (eds.), Unpacking Normativity: Conceptual, Normative, and Descriptive Issues (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2018), 227–250.Google Scholar
Jovanović, Miodrag, “‘Global/Transnational Law’ Challenges to Theorizing About Law,” in Fabra-Zamora, Jorge Luis (ed.), Jurisprudence in a Globalized World (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, forthcoming 2019).Google Scholar
Kadelbach, Stefan, “Jus Cogens, Obligations Erga Omnes and other Rules – The Identification of Fundamental Norms,” in Tomuschat, Christian and Thouvenin, Jean-Marc (eds.), The Fundamental rules of the International Legal Order – Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2006, 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kammerhofer, Jörg, “The Benefits of the Pure Theory of Law for International Lawyers, or: What use is Kelsenian Theory?” (2006) 12International Legal Theory: 5–54.Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, Jörg, Uncertainty in International Law – A Kelsenian Perspective (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, Jörg and D’Aspremont, Jean, “Introduction – The Future of International Legal Positivism,” in Kammerhofer, Jörg and D’Aspremont, Jean (eds.), International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Hamburg: Felix Mainer, 1956).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, “Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch,” in Political Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 93–131.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Arthur, “Problemgeschichte der Rechtsphilosophie,” in Kaufmann, Arthur, Hassemer, Winfried, and Neumann, Ulfried (eds.), Einführung in Rechtsphhilosophie und Rechtstheorie der Gegenwart (Heidelberg: C. F. Müller Verlag, 2004), 26–147.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Arthur, “Rechtsphilosophie, Rechtstheorie, Rechtsdogmatik,” in Kaufmann, Arthur, Hassemer, Winfried, and Neumann, Ulfried (eds.), Einführung in Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie der Gegenwart (Heidelberg: C.F. Müller Verlag, 2004), 1–25.Google Scholar
Kazui, Tashiro, “Foreign Relations during the Edo Period: Sakoku Reexamined” (1982) 8Journal of Japanese Studies2: 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keay, Andrew, “Comply or Explain in Corporate Governance Codes: In Need of Greater Regulatory Oversight?” (2014) 34Legal Studies2: 279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, J. Patrick, “The Twilight of Customary International Law” (2000) 40Virginia Journal of International Law2: 449–543.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr [P. Siebeck], 1920).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, “The Pure Theory of Law and Analytical Jurisprudence” (1941) 55Harvard Law Review1: 44–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Law and Peace in International Relations, The Oliver Wendell Holmes Lectures, 1940–41 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1942).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, General Theory of Law and State (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1949).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, “Science and Politics” (1951) 45The American Political Science Review3: 641–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, The Law of the United Nations – A Critical Analysis of Its Fundamental Problems (With Supplement) (London: Stevens & Sons Ltd., 1951).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Principles of International Law (New York: Rinehart & Company Inc., 1952).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, “On the Pure Theory of Law” (1966) 1Israel Law Review1: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Pure Theory of Law (trans. by Max Knight) (Berkeley: University of California Press: 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, On the Issue of the Continental Shelf – Two Legal Opinions (Wien: Springer, 1986).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, “Naturrechtslehre und Rechtspositivismus” in Koja, Friedrich (ed.), Hans Kelsen oder Die Reinheit der Rehtslehre (Vienna: Böhlau Verlag1988), 231–247.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Was ist Gerechtigkeit? (Stuttgart: Reclam, 2000).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, General Theory of Law and State (with a new introduction by A. Javier Treviño) (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2006).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, “On the Theory of Juridic Fictions. With Special Consideration of Vaihinger’s Philosophy of the As-If,” in Del Mar, Maksymilian and Twining, William (eds.), Legal Fictions in Theory and Practice (Cham: Springer, 2015), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, “Validity and Efficacy of the Law” (1967), in Bernal, Carlos et al. (eds.), Essays in Legal Philosophy – Eugenio Bulygin (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 52–68.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World (London: Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, “State of Nature versus Commercial Sociability as the Basis of International Law: Reflections on the Roman Foundations and Current Interpretations of the International Political and Legal Thought of Grotius, Hobbes, and Pufendorf,” in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 33–52.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, “The Redundancy of Soft Law” (1996) 65Nordic Journal of International Law2: 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, An Introduction to International Institutional Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, “(I Can’t Get No) Recognition: Subjects Doctrine and the Emergence of Non-State Actors,” in Petman, Jarna and Klabbers, Jan (eds.), Nordic Cosmopolitanism – Essays in International Law for Martti Koskenniemi (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003), 351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, “Virtuous Interpretation,” in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia et. al. (eds.), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years on, Vol. 1 (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010), 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, “Setting the Scene,” in Jan Klabbers, Anne Peters, and Geir Ulfstein, The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 1–44.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, Peters, Anne and Ulfstein, Geir, The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Klass, Gregory, “Efficient Breach,” in Klass, Gregory, Letsas, George, and Saprai, Prince (eds.), The Philosophical Foundations of Contract Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 362–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinton, Alexander W., “NATO’s Intervention in Kosovo: The Legal Case for Violating Yugoslavia’s National Sovereignty in the Absence of Security Council Approval” (2000) 22Houston Journal of International Law3: 403–449.Google Scholar
Klosko, George, Political Obligations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, Robert, Peremptory International Law – Jus Cogens: A General Inventory (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations – The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870– 1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, From Apology to Utopia – The Structure of International Legal Argument (Reissue with a new Epilogue) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. “Into Positivism: Georg Friedrich von Martens (1756–1821) and Modern International Law” (2008) 15Constellations2: 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, “‘The Lady Doth Protest Too Much’: Kosovo, and the Turn to Ethics in International Law,” in The Politics of International Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, “Methodology of International Law,” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul A., Naming and Necessity (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico, “Unilateral Enforcement of Collective Will: Kosovo, Iraq, and the Security Council” (1999) 3Max Planck Yearbook of International Law: 59–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krisch, Nico, Beyond Constitutionalism – The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, Nicola, A Life of H.L.A. Hart: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Lalonde, Suzanne, Determining Boundaries in a Conflicted World – The Role of Uti Possidetis (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Langford, Peter, Bryan, Ian and McGarry, John, “Introduction: Kelsen, Legal Science and Positive Law,” in Langford, Peter, Bryan, Ian, and McGarry, John (eds.), Kelsenian Legal Science and the Nature of Law (Cham: Springer, 2017), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lansing, Robert, The Peace Negotiations – A Personal Narrative (Orlando: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1921).Google Scholar
Larkins, Jeremy, From Hierarchy to Anarchy – Territory and Politics before Westphalia (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laursen, Andreas, “NATO, the War over Kosovo, and the ICTY Investigation” (2002) 17American University International Law Review4: 765–814.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, “Westlake and Present Day International Law” (1925) 15Economica: 307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, Private Law Sources and Analogies of International Law: With Special Reference to International Arbitration (Hamden: Archon Books, 1927).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, “The Covenant as the Higher Law” (1936) 17British Year Book of International Law: 54–65.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, HerschSir, The Development of International Law by the International Court (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, HerschSir, The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, HerschSir, Recognition in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, [1947] 2013).Google Scholar
Leben, Charles, “Hans Kelsen and the Advancement of International Law” (1998) 9European Journal of International Law2: 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiter, Brian, “Beyond the Hart/Dworkin Debate: The Methodology Problem in Jurisprudence” (2003) 48American Journal of Jurisprudence1: 17–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiter, Brian, Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiter, Brian, “Legal Realism and Legal Formalism: What Is the Issue?” (2010) 16Legal Theory2: 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiter, Brian, “The Demarcation Problem in Jurisprudence: A New Case for Skepticism” (2011) 31Oxford Journal of Legal Studies4: 663–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepard, Brian D., Customary International Law: A New Theory with Practical Applications (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf, “Normative Conflict and the Fuzziness of the International ius cogens Regime” (2009) 69Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht: 961–977.Google Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf, “Understanding the Jus Cogens Debate: The Pervasive Influence of Legal Positivism and Legal Idealism” (2015) 46Netherlands Yearbook of International Law: 51–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernando, Llano Alonso, “Cosmopolitanism and Natural Law in Cicero,” in Contreras, Francisco José (ed.), The Threads of Natural Law – Unravelling a Philosophical Tradition (Heidelberg: Springer, 2013), 27–36.Google Scholar
Long, Roderick T., “Hellenistic Philosophers of Law,” in Miller, Fred D.Jr. and Biondi, Carrie-Ann (eds.), A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence Vol. 6 – A History of the Philosophy of Law from the Ancient Greeks to the Scholastics (Heidelberg: Springer, 2007), 111–131.Google Scholar
Loquai, Heinz, “Kosovo – A Missed Opportunity for a Peaceful Solution to the Conflict?” (1999) OSCE Yearbook: 79–92.Google Scholar
Loquai, Heinz, Der Kosovo-Konflikt – Wege in einen vermeidbaren Krieg (Die Zeit von Ende November 1997 bis März 1999) (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2000).Google Scholar
Luhman, Niklas, Law as a Social System (translated by Klaus A. Ziegert) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas, A Systems Theory of Religion (translated by David A. Brenner with Adrian Hermann) (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
MacCormack, Geoffrey, “Anthropology and Legal Theory” (1978) The Juridical Review: 216–232.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (with a revised foreword) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, Neil, “Institutional Normative Order: A Conception of Law” (1997) 82Cornell Law Review5: 1051–1070.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil, Institutions of Law – An Essay in Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò, The Prince (Translated and edited by Peter Bondanella) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Marmor, Andrei, Law in the Age of Pluralism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmor, Andrei, “The Conventional Foundations of Law,” in Bertea, Stefano and Pavlakos, George (eds.), New Essays on the Normativity of Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011), 143–157.Google Scholar
Marmor, Andrei, “Farewell to Conceptual Analysis (in Jurisprudence),” in Waluchow, Wil and Sciaraffa, Stefan (eds.), Philosophical Foundations to the Nature of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martenczuk, Bernd, “The Security Council, the International Court and Judicial Review: What Lessons from Lockerbie?” (1999) 10European Journal of International Law3: 517–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martens, Georg Friedrich, Summary of the Law of Nations, Founded on the Treaties and Customs of the Modern Nations of Europe (translated by William Cobbett) (Philadelphia: Thomas Bradford, 1795).Google Scholar
Martin, Elizabeth A. (ed.), A Dictionary of Law (4th ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Martinez, Jenny S., The Slave Trade and the Origins of International Human Rights Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massa, Anne-Sophie, “NATO’s Intervention in Kosovo and the Decision of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia Not to Investigate: An Abusive Exercise of Prosecutorial Discretion?” (2006) 24Berkeley Journal of International Law2: 610–649.Google Scholar
McCaffrey, Stephen, “Lex Lata or the Continuum of State Responsibility,” in Weiler, Joseph H. H., Cassese, Antonio, and Spinedi, Marina (eds.), International Crimes of State – A Critical Analysis of the ILC’s Draft Article 19 on State Responsibility (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1989), 242–244.Google Scholar
McCormick, Alison, “From Sovereignty to Responsibility: An Emerging International Norm and Its Call to Action in Burma” (2011) 18Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies1: 563–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric, “Globalization,” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 493–507.Google Scholar
Merrills, John G., International Dispute Settlement (5th ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrills, John, “The Place of International Litigation in International Law,” in Klein, Natalie (ed.), Litigating International Law Disputes – Weighing the Balance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyerson, Denise, “The Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers” (2004) 4Macquarie Law Journal1: 1–6.Google Scholar
Michelon, Claudio, “The Public Nature of Private Law?,” in Michelon, Claudio et al. (eds.), The Public in Law Representations of the Political in Legal Discourse (Farnham: Ashgate, 2012), 195–204.Google Scholar
Miller, Fred D.Jr., “Aristotle’s Philosophy of Law,” in Miller, Fred D.Jr. and Biondi, Carrie-Ann (eds.), A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence Vol. 6 – A History of the Philosophy of Law from the Ancient Greeks to the Scholastics (Heidelberg: Springer, 2007), 79–110.Google Scholar
Miller, Fred D.Jr., “Near Eastern Antecedents of Western Legal Thought,” in Miller, Fred D.Jr. and Biondi, Carrie-Ann (eds.), A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence Vol. 6 – A History of the Philosophy of Law from the Ancient Greeks to the Scholastics (Heidelberg: Springer, 2007), 1–5.Google Scholar
Miller, Seumas, “Social Institutions,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014 Edition), at.Google Scholar
Moral Soiano, Leonor, “A Modest Notion of Coherence in Legal Reasoning. A Model for the European Court of Justice” (2003) 16Ratio Juris3: 296–323.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J., Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (2nd ed.) (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1954).Google Scholar
Morpeth, Neil, “Autarkeia: Notes on its Cultural and Historical Context” (1993) 25Prudentia (Supplementary Number: Multarum Artium Scientia):126–130.Google Scholar
Munzer, Stephen, Legal Validity (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Liam, What Makes Law? An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C., “Two Unhappy Dilemmas for Natural Law Jurisprudence” (2015) 60The American Journal of Jurisprudence2: 121–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Sean D., “Assessing the Legality of Invading Iraq” (2004) 92Georgetown Journal of International Law2: 173–257.Google Scholar
Murphy, Sean D., “Identification of Customary International Law and other Topics: The Sixty-Seventh Session of the International Law Commission” (2015) 109American Journal of International Law4: 822–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nader, Laura and Sursock, Andrée, “Anthropology and Justice,” in Cohen, Ronald L. (ed.), Justice – Views from the Social Sciences (New York: Plenum Press, 1986), 205–233.Google Scholar
Neiberg, Michael S., The Treaty of Versailles – A Concise History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Newey, Glen, Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Hobbes and Leviathan (London: Routledge, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, Timothy and Sandis, Constantine (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Action (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oellers-Frahm, Karin “Lawmaking through Advisory Opinions?” (2011) 12German Law Journal5: 1033–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orakhelashvili, Alexander, Peremptory Norms in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, Alexander, “The Acts of the Security Council: Meaning and Standards of Review” (2007) 11Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law: 143–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osherson, Daniel N. and Smith, Edward E., “On the Adequacy of Prototype Theory as the Theory of Concepts” (1981) 9Cognition1: 35–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palladini, Fiammetta, “Pufendorf Disciple of Hobbes: The Nature of Man and the State of Nature: The Doctrine of Socialitas” (2008) 34History of European Ideas1: 26–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmeter, David and Mavroidis, Petros C., “The WTO Legal System: Sources of Law” (1998) 92American Journal of International Law3: 398–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passerin d’Entreves, Alexander, The Notion of the State – An Introduction to Political Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Pavlakos, George and Rodriguez-Blanco, Veronica (eds.), Reasons and Intentions in Law and Practical Agency (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlakos, George and Rodriguez-Blanco, Veronica, “Introduction,” in Pavlakos, George and Rodriguez-Blanco, Veronica (eds.), Reasons and Intentions in Law and Practical Agency (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payan deh, Mehrdad, Internationales Gemeinschaftsrecht – Zur Herausbildung gemeinschaftsrechtlicher Strukturen im Völkerrecht der Globalisierung (Heidelberg: Springer, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payandeh, Mehrdad, “The Concept of International Law in the Jurisprudence of H.L.A. Hart” (2010) 21European Journal of International Law4: 967–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payandeh, Mehrdad, “With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility? The Concept of the Responsibility To Protect Within the Process of International Lawmaking” (2010) 35Yale Journal of International Law2: 469–516.Google Scholar
Pelc, Krzysztof J., “Eluding Efficiency: Why Do We Not See More Efficient Breach at the WTO?” (2010) 9 World Trade Review4: 629–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellet, Alain, “Brief Remarks on the Unilateral Use of Force” (2000) 11European Journal of International Law2: 385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellet, Alain, “Article 38,” in Zimmerman, Andreas, Tomuschat, Christian, and Frahm, Karin Oellers- (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice – A Commentary (2nd ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 677–792.Google Scholar
Peristiany, John George, “Law,” in Evans-Pritchard, Edward Evan et al. (eds.), The Institutions of Primitive Society(Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1954), 39–49.Google Scholar
Perreau-Saussine, Amanda, “Immanuel Kant on International Law,” in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 53–78.Google Scholar
Perry, Stephen, “Second Order Reasons, Uncertainty, and Legal Theory” (1989) 62Southern California Law Review: 913–994.Google Scholar
Perry, Stephen R., “On the Relationship Between Corrective and Distributive Justice,” in Horder, Jeremy (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Fourth Series) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 237–263.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, “Statehood after 1989: ‘Effectivités’ between Legality and Virtuality,” in Crawford, James and Nouwen, Sarah (eds.), Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law, Vol III (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012), 171–183.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, Beyond Human Rights: The Legal Status of the Individual in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Anne, “International Organizations and International Law,” in Cogan, Jacob Katz, Hurd, Ian, and Johnstone, Ian (eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Organizations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 33–59.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne and Pagotto, Isabella, “Soft Law as a New Mode of Governance: A Legal Perspective” (2006) New Modes of Governance Project, Paper n. 04º/D11: 1–35.Google Scholar
Peters, Christopher J. (ed.), Precedent in the United States Supreme Court (Dordrecht: Springer, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Ronald M., The Massachusetts Constitution of 1780: A Social Compact (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Pettersson, Therese and Wallensteen, Peter. “Armed Conflicts, 1946–2014” (2015) 52Journal of Peace Research4: 536–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer, A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Eric and Sykes, Alan O., “Efficient Breach of International Law: Optimal Remedies, Legalized Noncompliance, and Related Issues” (2011) 110Michigan Law Review2: 243–294.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe, “Philosophical Theory and International Law,” in Bibliotheca Visseriana dissertationum ius internationale illustrantium Vol. 1 (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1923).Google Scholar
Priel, Dan, “Jurisprudence and Necessity” (2007) 20Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence1: 173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priel, Dan, “Jurisprudence and Psychology,” in Del Mar, Maksymilian (ed.), New Waves in Philosophy of Law (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priel, Dan, “Jurisprudence Between Science and the Humanities” (2012) 4Washington University Jurisprudence Review: 269–323.Google Scholar
Primmer, Jennifer W., “Beyond the Law-State: The Adequacy of Raz’s Account of Legal Systems in Explaining Intra-State and Supra-State Legality” (2015) 28Ratio Juris1: 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pütter, Johann Stephan and Achenwall, Gottfried, Anfangsgründe des Naturrechts (Elementa juris naturae) (edited by Schröder, Jan) (Frankfurt: Insel Verlag, 1995).Google Scholar
Radbruch, Gustav, “Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946)” (2006) 26Oxford Journal of Legal Studies1: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radbruch, Gustav, Rechtsphilosophie (Heidelberg: C. F. Müller Verlag, 2011).Google Scholar
Raftopoulos, Evangelos, The Inadequacy of the Contractual Analogy in the Law of Treaties (Athens: Publications of the Hellenic Institute of International and Foreign Law, 1990).Google Scholar
Ragazzi, Maurizio, The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Rainioa, J., Lalu, K. and Penttila, A., “Independent Forensic Autopsies in an Armed Conflict: Investigation of the Victims from Racak, Kosovo” (2001) 116Forensic Science International2: 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralston, Jackson Harvey, International Arbitration from Athens to Locarno (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1929).Google Scholar
Ramsey, William M., “Prototypes and Conceptual Analysis” (1992) 11Topoi1: 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, William M., Representation Reconsidered (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratner, Steven R., The Thin Justice of International Law: A Moral Reckoning of the Law of Nations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauschning, Dietrich, “Georg Friedrich von Martens (1756–1821) Lehrer des praktischen Europäischen Völkerrechts und der Diplomatie zu Göttingen,” in Loos, Fritz (ed.), Rechtswissenschaft in Göttingen: Göttinger Juristen aus 250 Jahren (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1987), 123–145.Google Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph, The Authority of Law – Essays on Law and Morality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph, The Concept of a Legal System: An Introduction to the Theory of Legal System (2nd ed.) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph, “Can There Be a Theory of Law?,” in Golding, Martin P. and Edmundson, William A. (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2005), 324–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph, “Respect for Law,” in The Authority of Law – Essays on Law and Morality (2nd ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 250–261.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, “The Purity of the Pure Theory,” in The Authority of Law – Essays on Law and Morality (2nd ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 293–312.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, “Reasons: Explanatory and Normative,” in Sandis, Constantine (ed.), New Essays on the Explanation of Action (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), 184–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph, “Human Rights in the Emerging World Order” (2010) 1Transnational Legal Theory1: 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph, “Human Rights Without Foundations,” in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 321–337.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, “On the Guise of the Good,” in Tenenbaum, Sergio (ed.), Desire, Practical Reason and the Good(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 111–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, Donald H., “Reasons, Authority, and the Meaning of ‘Obey’: Further Thoughts on Raz and Obedience to Law” (1990) 3Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence1: 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichler, Paul S. and Parkhomenko, Yuri B., “Nicaragua v. United States and Matters of Evidence Before the International Court of Justice,” in Obregon, Edgardo Sobenes and Samson, Benjamin (eds.), Nicaragua Before the International Court of Justice – Impacts on International Law (Cham: Springer, 2018), 43–56.Google Scholar
Reisman, W. Michael, “Kosovo Antinomies” (1999) 93American Journal of International Law4: 860–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisman, W. Michael, “Sanctions and International Law” (2009) 4Intercultural Human Rights Law Review1: 9–20.Google Scholar
Rigaux, Francois, “Hans Kelsen on International Law” (1998) 9European Journal of International Law2: 325–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Blanco, Veronica, Law and Authority under the Guise of the Good (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014).Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Blanco, Veronica, “Legal Authority and the Paradox of Intention in Action,” in Pavlakos, George and Rodriguez-Blanco, Veronica (eds.), Reasons and Intentions in Law and Practical Agency (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, Cesare P. R., “The Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies: The Pieces of the Puzzle” (1999) 31New York University Journal of International Law and Politics4: 709–751.Google Scholar
Romano, Cesare P. R., “The Shift From the Consensual to the Compulsory Paradigm in International Adjudication: Elements for a Theory of Consent” (2007) 39New York University Journal of International Law and Politics4: 791–872.Google Scholar
Romano, Cesare P. R., “A Taxonomy of International Rule of Law Institutions” (2011) 2Journal of International Dispute Settlement1: 241–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, Cesare P. R., “Litigating International Law Disputes: Where To?,” in Klein, Natalie (ed.), Litigating International Law Disputes – Weighing the Balance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 461–471.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor, “Reclaiming Concepts,” in Núñez, Rafael and Freeman, Walter J. (eds.), Reclaiming Cognition: The Primacy of Action, Intention and Emotion (Thorverton: Imprint Academic, 1999), 61–76.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor and Mervis, Carolyn B., “Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories” (1975) 7Cognitive Psychology: 573–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Alf, A Textbook of International Law – General Part (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1947).Google Scholar
Sancin, Vasilka (ed.), Responsibility to Protect: Where Do We Stand Ten Years After? (Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Sandis, Constantine (ed.), New Essays on the Explanation of Action (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandro, Paolo, “An Axiomatic Theory of Law” (2011) 17Res Publica4: 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarffe, Eric J., “‘A New Philosophy for International Law’ and Dworkin’s Political Realism” (2016) 29Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence1: 191–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, Frederick, Playing By the Rules – A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick, The Force of Law (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Schermers, Henry G. and Blokker, Niels M., International Institutional Law – Unity within Diversity(5th revised ed.) (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., “System‐Building in Investment Treaty Arbitration and Lawmaking” (2011) 12German Law Journal5: 1083–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlütter, Birgit, Developments in Customary International Law (Theory and the Practice of the International Court of Justice and the International ad hoc Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and Yugoslavia) (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010).Google Scholar
Schrijver, Nico, Sovereignty over Natural Resources – Balancing Rights and Duties (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R., “How to Derive ‘Ought’ From ‘Is’” (1964) 73The Philosophical Review1: 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahabuddeen, Mohamed, Precedent in the World Court (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahabuddeen, Mohamed, International Criminal Justice at the Yugoslav Tribunal: A Judge’s Recollection (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Scott J., Legality (Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Malcolm, Title to Territory in Africa – International Legal Issues (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Shaw, Malcolm N., International Law (6th ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, Nicholas and Bayne, Tim, “The Vegetative State and the Science of Consciousness” (2010) 61The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science3: 459–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shelton, Dinah, “International Law and ‘Relative Normativity,’” in Evans, Malcolm D. (ed.), International Law (1st ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), 141–171.Google Scholar
Shelton, Dinah, “Sherlock Holmes and the Mystery of Jus Cogens” (2015) 46Netherlands Yearbook of International Law: 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiner, Roger A., “Law and Normativity,” in Patterson, Dennis (ed.), A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (2nd ed.) (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), 417–445.Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno, “Self-contained Regimes” (1985) 16Netherlands Yearbook of International Law: 111–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simma, Bruno, “NATO, the UN and the Use of Force: Legal Aspects” (1999) 10European Journal of International Law1: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simma, Bruno, “Fragmentation in a Positive Light” (2004) 25Michigan Journal of International Law4: 845–847.Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno and Alston, Philip “The Sources of Human Rights Law: Custom, Jus Cogens and General Principles” (1988–1989) 12Australian Yearbook of International Law:82–108.Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno and Pulkowski, Dirk, “Of Planets and the Universe: Self-contained Regimes in International Law” (2006) 17European Journal of International Law3: 483–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skubiszewski, Krzysztof, “Implied Powers of International Organizations,” in Dinstein, Yoram (ed.), International Law at a Time of Perplexity – Essays in Honour of Shabatai Rosenne (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1989), 855–868.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie, “A Global Community of Courts” (2003) 44Harvard International Law Journal1: 191–219.Google Scholar
Sloan, Blaine, “General Assembly Resolutions Revisited (Forty Years Later)” (1988) 58British Yearbook of International Law: 39–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slocum, Brian G. (ed.), The Nature of Legal Interpretation: What Jurists Can Learn about Legal Interpretation from Linguistics and Philosophy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solum, Lawrence B., “Procedural Justice” (2004) 78Southern California Law Review1: 181–321.Google Scholar
Somek, Alexander, “Kelsen Lives” (2007) 18European Journal of International Law3: 409–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somek, Alexander, “Beyond Kelsen and Hart,” in Kammerhofer, Jörg and D’Aspremont, Jean (eds.), International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 151–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spain, Anna, “Integration Matters: Rethinking the Architecture of International Dispute Resolution” (2010) 32University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law1: 1–55.Google Scholar
Spain, Anna, “Examining the International Judicial Function: International Courts as Dispute Resolvers” (2011) 34Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review1: 5–31.Google Scholar
Spierman, Ole, International Legal Argument in the Permanent Court of International Justice – The Rise of the International Judiciary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Stevenson, Drury D., “Kelsen’s View of the Addressee of the Law: Primary and Secondary Norms,” in Telman, D. A. Jeremy (ed.), Hans Kelsen in America – Selective Affinities and the Mysteries of Academic Influence(Berlin: Springer, 2016), 297–318.Google Scholar
Striker, Gisela, Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, Robert S., “H. L. A. Hart on Justice” (1962) 59Journal of Philosophy: 479–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, Robert S., “The New Analytical Jurist” (1966) 41New York University Law Review5: 861–896.Google Scholar
Sweet, Alec Stone, The Judicial Construction of Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmon, Stefan, “The Security Council as World Legislature” (2005) 99American Journal of International Law1: 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmon, Stefan, “Determining Customary International Law: The ICJ’s Methodology between Induction, Deduction and Assertion” (2015) 26The European Journal of International Law2: 417–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z., “Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global” (2008) 30Sidney Law Review3: 375–411.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian, A Realistic Theory of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tams, Christian J., “Meta-Custom and the Court: A Study in Judicial Law-Making” (2015) 14The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals1: 51–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, Elaine S., “An Empty Shell? Rethinking the Usury Laws in Medieval Europe” (2002) 23The Journal of Legal History3: 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenenbaum, Sergio (ed.), Desire, Practical Reason and the Good(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesón, Fernando R., “Fake Custom,” in Lepard, Brian D. (ed.), Reexamining Customary International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 86–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, Gunther, “Autopoiesis in Law and Society: A Rejoinder to Blankenburg” (1984) 18Law & Society Review2: 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thirlway, Hugh, The Sources of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Tomuschat, Christian, “Reconceptualizing the Debate on Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes– Concluding Observations,” in Tomuschat, Christian and Thouvenin, Jean-Marc (eds.), The Fundamental Rules of the International Legal Order – Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2006), 425–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toohey, Lisa, “Barriers to Universal Membership of the World Trade Organization” (2012) 19Australian International Law Journal: 97–115.Google Scholar
Trachtman, Joel P., “The Growing Obsolescence of Customary International Law,” in Bradley, Curtis A. (ed.), Custom’s Future – International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016), 172–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treves, Tulio, “Customary International Law,” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard, The Rights of War and Peace – Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Twining, William, General Jurisprudence: Understanding Law from a Global Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twining, William, Globalisation and Legal Scholarship (Oisterwijk: Wolf Legal Publishers, 2011).Google Scholar
Ulfstein, Geir, “Institutions and Competences,” in Jan Klabbers, Anne Peters, and Geir Ulfstein, The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 45–80.Google Scholar
Ullmann, Walter, Law and Politics in the Middle Ages – An Introduction to the Sources of Medieval Political Ideas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Vaihinger, Hans, The Philosophy of ‘As if’ – A System of Theoretical, Practical and Religious Fictions of Mankind (translated by C. K. Ogden) (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1925).Google Scholar
Valticos, Nicolas, “Foreword to the Original Edition,” in Ramcharan, Bertrand G. (ed.), International Law and Fact-Finding in the Field of Human Rights (revised and edited reprint) (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2014), xv–xix.Google Scholar
Vamvoukos, Athanassios, Termination of Treaties in International Law: The Doctrine of Rebus Sic Stantibus and Desuetude (Oxford: Clarendon Oxford1985).Google Scholar
van Aaken, Anne, “Balancing of Human Rights – Constitutional Interpretation in International Law,” in Jovanović, Miodrag A. and Krstić, Ivana (eds.), Human Rights Today – 60 Years of the Universal Declaration (Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing, 2010), 51–76.Google Scholar
VanLandingham, Rachel E., “Politics or Law? The Dual Nature of the Responsibility to Protect” (2012) 41Denver Journal of International Law & Policy1: 101–123.Google Scholar
Van Orman Quine, Willard, “Two Dogmas of Empiricism” (1951) 60The Philosophical Review1: 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venzke, Ingo, How Interpretation Makes International Law – On Semantic Change and Normative Twists (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdross, Alfred, Völkerrecht (unter Mitarbeit von Karl Zemanek) (4th ed.) (Wien: Springer, 1959).Google Scholar
Verdross, Alfred, “Jus Dispositivum and Jus Cogens in International Law” (1966) 60American Journal of International Law1: 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernet, Paula María, “Decolonization: Spanish Territories,” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Vidmar, Jure, Democratic Statehood in International Law: The Emergence of New States in Post-Cold War Practice (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013).Google Scholar