Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T10:31:15.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The distribution of malaria parasites in the mosquito vector: consequences for assessing infection intensity in the field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Valerie Isham
Affiliation:
University College London
Graham Medley
Affiliation:
University of Warwick
Get access

Summary

The most common measures of mosquito infection with Plasmodium estimated in the field are the prevalence and intensity of malarial parasites. Of these quantities, the prevalence is the simplest to measure. We are interested in the effect of sample size (numbers of mosquitoes examined) on the accuracy of estimation of these quantities, and the relationship between the distribution of infectious stages within the mosquitoes and the population dynamics and genetics of malaria.

Previous work has shown that the distribution of malaria oocysts within their vector hosts is empirically well described by a negative binomial distribution with varying mean and overdispersion (Medley et al. 1993). Although this research was carried out on laboratory derived infections, the relationship appears consistent over a variety of malaria and vector species combinations. The implication is that the relationship is an intrinsic feature of the population biology of malaria parasites within their vectors.

In this presentation, we use data from wild caught mosquitoes (Anopheles gambiae s.L and A. funestus) infected with Plasmodium falciparum. There were a total of 1112 mosquitoes within 64 samples (mean 17.4 mosquitoes, range 2–60): each sample being the total number of mosquitoes caught in a household. The total number of oocysts found in the mosquitos was 960 (mean intensity within samples 1.34, range 0.023–24). For further details see Billingsley et al. (1994). The distribution of oocysts was found to be consistent with the laboratory derived infections, and no difference was detected between the distributions in the different vector species, further suggesting that the distribution is a conserved feature of the population biology of different parasite and host species.

Type
Chapter
Information
Models for Infectious Human Diseases
Their Structure and Relation to Data
, pp. 204 - 205
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×