Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-jzjqj Total loading time: 1.174 Render date: 2022-08-16T14:08:29.731Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true
Mixed Methods Mixed Methods
Interviews, Surveys, and Cross-Cultural Comparisons
Buy print or eBook[Opens in a new window]

Book contents

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2017

Robert W. Schrauf
Robert W. Schrauf
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Mixed Methods
Interviews, Surveys, and Cross-Cultural Comparisons
 , pp. 238 - 256
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Purchase

Buy Book

Buy print or eBook[Opens in a new window]

References

Allalouf, A, Hambleton, RK, Sireci, SG 1999. “Identifying the causes of DIF in translated verbal items.” Journal of Educational Measurement 36: 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alzheimer‘s Association 2013. “2013 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures.” Alzheimer’s and Dementia 9: 208–245.CrossRef
Arrendondo, GF, Vaillant, D 2004. “Mexicans,” in Grossman, JR, Keating, AD, and Reiff, JL (eds.) Encyclopedia of Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 532–534.Google Scholar
Austin, JL 1962. How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Axinn, WG, Pearce, LD 2006. Mixed method data collection strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayalon, L, Areán, PA 2004. “Knowledge of Alzheimer’s disease in four ethnic groups.” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 19: 51–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bachman, LF 1990. Fundamental considerations in language testing. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, LF, Palmer, AS 1996. Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baer, RD, Weller, SC, Garcia de Alba Garcia, J, Glazer, M, Trotter, R, Pachter, L, Klein, RE 2003. “A cross-cultural approach to the study of the folk illness nervios.” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 27: 315–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, RD, Weller, SC, Garcia de Alba Garcia, J, Salcedo Rocha, AL 2004. “A comparison of community and physician explanatory models of AIDS in Mexico and the United States.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 18: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, RD, Weller, SC, Garcia de Alba Garcia, J, Salcedo Rocha, AL 2008. “Cross-cultural perspectives on physician and lay models of the common cold.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 22: 148–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baer, RD, Weller, SC, Pachter, L, Trotter, R, Garcia de Alba Garcia, J, Glazer, M, Klein, R, Deitrick, L, Baker, DF, Brown, LF, Kahn-Gordon, K, Martin, SR, Nichols, J, Ruggerio, J 1999. “Cross-cultural perspectives on the common cold: Data from five populations.” Human Organization 58: 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakeman, R, Robinson, BF 2005. Understanding statistics in the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
Baker, CD 1984. “The search for adultness: Membership work in adolescent-adult talk.” Human Studies 7: 301–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, CD 2004. “Membership categorization and interview accounts,” in Silverman, D (ed.) Qualitative research: Theory, method, and practice, 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications, pp. 160–176.Google Scholar
Baker, CD, Johnson, G 2000. “Stories of courtship and marriage: Orientations in openings.” Narrative Inquiry 10: 377–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballenger, J 2000. “Beyond the characteristic plaques and tangles: Mid-twentieth century U.S. psychiatry and the fight against senility,” in Whitehouse, PJ, Maurer, K, and Ballenger, J (eds.) Concepts of Alzheimer’s disease: Biological, clinical, and cultural perspectives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 83–103.Google Scholar
Ballenger, JF 2006. Self, senility, and Alzheimer’s disease in modern America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Barth, F 1969 [1998]-a. “Introduction,” in Barth, F (ed.) Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, pp. 9–38.Google Scholar
Barth, F 1969 [1998]-b. “Pathan identity and its maintenance,” in Barth, F (ed.) Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, pp. 117–134.Google Scholar
Barth, F 1975. Ritual and knowledge among the Baktaman of New Guinea. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Barth, F 1983. Sohar: Culture and society in an Omani town. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Barth, F 1987. Cosmologies in the making: A generative approach to cultural variation in inner New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, F 1993. Balinese worlds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Barth, F 1999. “Comparative methodologies in the analysis of anthropological data,” in Bowen, JR and Petersen, R (eds.) Critical comparisons in politics and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, F 2007. “Overview: Sixty years in anthropology.” Annual Review of Anthropology 36: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelder, WH, Romney, AK 1988. “Test theory without an answer key.” Psychometrika 53: 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battle, J 2002. Culture free self-esteem inventories, 3rd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Baumann, G 1996. Contesting culture: Discourse of identity in multi-ethnic London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Behling, O, Law, KS (eds.) 2000. Translating questionnaires and other research instruments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, T, Savage, M, Silva, E, Warde, A, Gayo-Cal, M, Wright, D 2009. Culture, class, distinction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernard, HR 2006. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, 4th ed. New York: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
Bernard, HR (ed.) 2011. Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
Blessed, G, Tomlinson, BE, Roth, M 1968. “The association between quantitative measures of dementia and senile change in the cerebral grey matter of elderly subjects.” British Journal of Psychiatry 114: 797–811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloor, D 1997. Wittgenstein: Rules and institutions. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bolden, GL 2009. “Implementing incipient actions: The discourse marker ‘so’ in English conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 974–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, SP 1994. “Cultural domain analysis.” Journal of Quantitative Anthropology 4: 261–278.Google Scholar
Borgatti, SP 2002. Netdraw software for network visualization. Lexington, KY: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
Borgatti, SP, Everett, MG, Freeman, LC 2002. UCINET 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Boston: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
Borgatti, SP, Haglin, D 2011. “Consensus analysis,” in Kronenfeld, D, Bennardo, G, De Munck, V, and Fischer, MD (eds.) A companion to cognitive anthropology. New York: Blackwell, pp. 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, SP, Mehra, A, Brass, DL, Labianca, G 2009. “Network analysis in the social sciences.” Science 323: 892–895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boster, JS 1985. “‘Requiem for the omniscient informant’: There’s life in the old girl yet,” in Dougherty, JWP (ed.) Directions in cognitive anthropology. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 177–197.Google Scholar
Boster, JS 1986. “Exchange of varieties and information between Aguaruna Manioc cultivators.” American Anthropologist 88: 428–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P 1971. “Intellectual field and creative project,” in Young, MFD (ed.) Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education. London: Collier-Macmillan, pp. 161–188.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P 1984. Distinction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P 1988. Homo academicus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P, Passeron, Jean-Claude 1977. Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P, Wacquant, LJD 1992. An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bradburn, NM, Sudman, S 1979. Improving interview method and questionnaire design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Breen, R, Rottman, DB 1998. “Is the national state the appropriate geographical unit for class analysis?” Sociology 32: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breivik, LE, Martinez-Insua, AE 2008. “Grammaticalization, subjectification and non-concord in English existential sentences.” English Studies 89: 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, RL, Prediger, DJ 1981. “Coefficient kappa. Some uses, misuses, and alternatives.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 41: 687–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, CL 1986. Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, CL 2007. “Anthropology, interviewing, and communicability in contemporary society.” Current Anthropology 48: 551–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brislin, RW 1970. “Back translation for cross-cultural research.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1: 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R, Gilman, A 1960. “The pronouns of power and solidarity,” in Sebeok, TA (ed.) Style in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 253–276.Google Scholar
Bryman, A 2006. “Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done?” Qualitative Research 6: 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, FB, Yarnold, PR 1995. “Principle components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis,” in Grimm, L and Yarnold, PR (eds.) Reading and understanding multivariate statistics, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 99–136.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M, Hall, K 2004. “Language and identity,” in Duranti, A (ed.) A companion to linguistic anthropology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 369–394.Google Scholar
Canale, M 1983. “From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy,” in Richards, JC and Schmidt, RW (eds.) Language and communication. London: Longman, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Canale, M, Swain, M 1980. “Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing.” Applied Linguistics 1: 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caulkins, D, Hyatt, SB 1999. “Using consensus analysis to measure cultural diversity in organizations and social movements.” Field Methods 11: 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavez, LR, Hubbell, FA, McMullin, JM, Martinez, RG, Mishra, SI 1995. “Structure and meaning in models of breast and cervical cancer risk factors: A comparison of perceptions among Latinas, Anglo women, and physicians.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 9: 40–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chernilo, D 2006. “Social theory’s methodological nationalism: Myth and reality.” European Journal of Social Theory 9: 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin, AL, Negash, S, Hamilton, R 2011. “Diversity and disparity in dementia: The impact of ethnoracial differences in Alzheimer disease.” Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 25: 187–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chun, KM, Organista, PB, Marin, G (eds.) 2003. Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement, and applied research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicourel, A 1974. Theory and method in a study of Argentine fertility. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Clark, C, DeCarli, C, Mungas, D, Chui, H, Higdon, R, Nunez, J, Fernandez, H, Negron, M, Manly, J, Ferris, S, Perez, A, Torres, M, Ewbank, D, Glooser, G, van Belle, G 2005a. “Earlier onset of Alzheimer’s disease symptoms in Latinos compared with Anglo individuals.” Archives of Neurology 62: 774–778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, HH, Gerrig, RT 1990. “Quotations as demonstrations.” Language 66: 764–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, HH, Schober, MF 1992. “Asking questions and influencing answers,” in Tanur, JM (ed.) Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys. New York: Russell Sage, pp. 15–48.Google Scholar
Clark, PC, Kutner, NG, Goldstein, FC, Peterson-Hazen, S, Garner, V, Zhang, R, Bowles, T 2005b. “Impediments to timely diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease in African Americans.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53: 2012–2017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Comrie, B, Haspelmath, H, Bickel, B 2008. Leipzig Glossing Rules. Retrieved December 5, 2013, from www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/resources/glossing-rules.php.
Connell, CM, Gallant, MP 1996. “‘Spouse caregivers’ attitudes toward obtaining a diagnosis of a dementing illness.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 44: 1003–1010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connell, CM, Roberts, JS, McLaughlin, SJ 2007. “Public opinion about Alzheimer’s disease among blacks, hispanics, and whites.” Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 21: 232–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connell, CM, Roberts, JS, McLaughlin, SJ, Akinleye, D 2009a. “Racial differences in knowledge and beliefs about Alzheimer’s disease.” Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 23: 110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, CM, Roberts, JS, McLaughlin, SJ, Carpenter, BD 2009b. “Black and white adult family members’ attitudes toward a dementia diagnosis.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 57: 1562–1568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, FG, Schober, MF, Schwarz, N 2014. “Pragmatic processes in survey interviewing,” in Holtgraves, T (ed.) The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 420–437.Google Scholar
Coon, DW, Rubert, M, Solano, N, Mausbach, B, Kramer, H, Argüelles, T, Haley, WE, Thompson, LW, … Gallagher-Thompson, D 2004. “Well-being, appraisal, and coping in Latina and Caucasian female dementia caregivers: Findings from the REACH study.” Aging and Mental Health 8: 330–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corbin, J, Strauss, A 2007. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 3rd ed. Walnut Creek, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E 1998. “Coherent voicing: On prosody in conversational reported speech.” In LiSt: Interaction and Linguistic Structures 1: 1–28.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E 2004. “Prosody and sequence organization in English conversation: The case of new beginnings,” in Couper-Kuhlen, E and Ford, CF (eds.) Sound patterns in interaction: Cross-linguistics studies from conversation. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 335–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, JW 2003. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Creswell, JW 2015. A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Creswell, JW, Plano Clark, VL 2010. Designing and conducting mixed methods research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Creswell, JW, Plano Clark, VL, Gutmann, ML, Hanson, WE 2003. “Advanced mixed methods research designs,” in Tashakkori, A and Teddlie, C (eds.) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 209–240.Google Scholar
Croot, EJ, Lees, J, Grant, G 2011. “Evaluating standards in cross-language research: A critique of Squires’ criteria.” International Journal of Nursing Studies 48: 1002–1011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Fina, A 2012. Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeJordy, R, Borgatti, SP, Roussin, C, Halgin, DS 2007. “Visualizing proximity data.” Field Methods 19: 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De la Mota, C, Butraqueno, PM, Prieto, P 2010. “Mexican Spanish intonation,” in Prieto, P and Roseana, P (eds.) Transcription of intonation of the Spanish language. Munchen: Lincom Europa, pp. 319–350.Google Scholar
de Saussure, F 1916 [1974]. Course in general linguistics. Bally, C and Sechahaye, A with Reidlinger, A (eds.) Translated by Baskin, W. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Dewey, J 1925. Experience and nature. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger.Google Scholar
Dilworth-Anderson, P, Gibson, BE 2002. “The cultural influence of values, norms, meanings, and perceptions in understanding dementia in ethnic minorities.” Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 16: S56–S63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dressler, WW, Balieiro, MC, dos Santos, JE 2015. “Finding culture change in the second factor: Stability and change in cultural consensus and residual agreement.” Field Methods 27(1): 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, P, Heritage, J 1992. “Analyzing talk at work: An introduction,” in Drew, P and Heritage, J (eds.) Talk at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–65.Google Scholar
Du Bois, JW 2007. “The stance triangle,” in Engelbretson, R (ed.) Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 139–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, JW, Schuetze-Coburn, S, Cummings, S, Paolino, D 1993. “Outline of discourse transcription,” in Edwards, JA and Lampert, MD (eds.) Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Duranti, A 1997. Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D 1994. “Script formulations: An analysis of event descriptions in conversation.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13: 211–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D 1995. “Two to tango: Script formulations, dispositions, and rhetorical symmetry in relationship troubles talk.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 28: 319–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D 1997. Discourse and cognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Edwards, D 2000. “Extreme case formulations: Softeners, investment, and doing nonliteral.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 33(4): 347–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D 2003. “Analyzing racial discourse: The discursive psychology of mind-world relationships,” in Van den Berg, H, Wetherell, M, and Houtkoop-Steenstra, H (eds.) Analyzing race talk: Multidisciplinary perspectives on the research interview. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 31–48.Google Scholar
Eidhem, H 1969 [1998]. “When ethnic identity is a social stigma,” in Barth, F (ed.) Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, pp. 39–57.Google Scholar
Ember, CR, Ember, M 2009. Cross-cultural research methods, 2nd ed. New York: Altamira.Google Scholar
Ensink, T 2003. “The frame analysis of research interviews: Social categorization and footing in interview discourse,” in Van den Berg, H, Wetherell, M, and Houtkoop-Steenstra, H (eds.) Analyzing race talk: Multidisciplinary perspectives on research interviews. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 156–176.Google Scholar
Eriksen, TH 2010. Ethnicity and nationalism, 3rd ed. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Fabrigar, LR, Wegener, DT 2012. Exploratory factor analysis (Understanding Statistics). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Farr, M 2005. Latino language and literacy in ethnolinguistic Chicago. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Feilzer, MY 2010. “Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 4: 6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetters, MD, Curry, LA, Creswell, JW 2013. “Achieving integration in mixed methods designs–principles and practices.” Health Services Research 35: 2134–56.Google Scholar
Fickett, JG 1972. “Tense and aspect in Black English.” Journal of English Linguistics 6: 17–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foddy, W 1993. Constructing questions for interviews and questionnaires: Theory and practice in social research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontaine, JRJ 2008. “Traditional and multilevel approaches in cross-cultural research: An integration of methodological frameworks,” in Van de Vijver, FJR, Van Hemert, DA, and Poortinga, YH (eds.) Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 65–92.Google Scholar
Foucault, M 1965. Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason, translated by Howard, R. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Foucault, M 1970. The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Foucault, M 1988. “Technologies of the self,” in Gutman, ML and Hutton, P (eds.) Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, pp. 16–49.Google Scholar
Fowler, FJ, Mangione, TW 1990. Standardized survey interviewing: Minimizing interviewer-related error. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, PJ 2000. “The role of the concept of Alzheimer’s disease in the development of the Alzheimer’s Association in the United States,” in Whitehouse, PJ, Maurer, K, and Ballenger, JF (eds.) Concepts of Alzheimer’s disease: Biological, clinical, and cultural perspectives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fries, CJ 2009. “Bourdieu’s reflexive sociology as a theoretical basis for mixed methods research: An application to complementary and alternative medicine.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 3: 326–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, JM 2003. “The influence of speaker roles on discourse marker use.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H 1948 [2006]. Seeing sociologically: The routine grounds of social action. Rawls, A (ed.). Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gee, JP, Michaels, S, O’Connor, MC 1992. “Discourse analysis,” in LeCompte, MD, Millroy, WL, and Pressle, J (eds.) The handbook of qualitative research in education. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 227–291.Google Scholar
Geertz, C 1973. The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Glaser, B, Strauss, A 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Goffman, E 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Goffman, E 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Greenacre, MJ 2007. Correspondence analysis in practice. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, JC, Caracelli, VJ, Graham, WF 1989. “Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 11: 255–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, HP 1975. “Logic and conversation,” in Cole, P and Morgan, J (eds.) Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
Grossman, JR, Keating, AD, Reiff, JL 2004. Encyclopedia of Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Guba, E, Lincoln, Y 1989. Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Gubrium, JF, Holstein, J (eds.) 2002. Handbook of interview research: Context and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Gubrium, JF, Holstein, JA, Marvasti, AB, McKinney, KD 2012. The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft. Walnut Creek, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guest, A 2007. “Cultures of childhood and psychosocial characteristics: Self-esteem and social comparison in two distinct communities.” Ethos 35: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillemin, F, Bombardier, C, Beaton, D 1993. “Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 46: 1417–1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurland, BJ, Wilder, DE, Lantigua, R, Yaakov, S, Chen, J, Killefer, E, Mayeux, R 1999. “Rates of dementia in three ethnoracial groups.” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 14: 481–493.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haaland, G 1969 [1988]. “Economic determinants in ethnic processes,” in Barth, F (ed.) Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, pp. 58–73.Google Scholar
Hambleton, RK, Merenda, PF, Spielberger, CD (eds.) 2005. Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hambleton, RK, Zenisky, AL 2011. “Translating and adapting tests for cross-cultural assessments,” in Matsumoto, D and Van de Vijver, FJR (eds.) Cross-cultural research methods in psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 46–74.Google Scholar
Handwerker, P, Borgatti, S 2000. “Text analysis: Qualitative and quantitative methods,” in Bernard, HR (ed.) Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Walnut Creek, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 595–646.Google Scholar
Hanks, WF 1992. “The indexical ground of deictic reference,” in Duranti, A and Goodwin, C (eds.) Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 43–76.Google Scholar
Harkness, J 2003. “Questionnaire translation,” in Harkness, J, Van de Vijver, FJR, and Moher, P (eds.) Cross-cultural survey methods. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 35–56.Google Scholar
Harkness, J, Pennell, BE, Schoua-Glusberg, A 2004. “Survey questionnaire translation and assessment,” in Presser, S, Rothgeb, J, Couper, MP, Lessler, JT, Martin, E, and Singer, E (eds.) Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 453–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harkness, J, Schoua-Glusberg, A 1998. “Questionnaires in translation.” ZUMA-Nachrichten Spezial January: 87–126.
Harre, R, Gillet, G 1994. The discursive mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Harrits, GS 2011. “More than a method?: A discussion of paradigm differences within mixed methods research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 5: 50–66.Google Scholar
Hepburn, A, Wiggins, S (eds.) 2007. Discursive research in practice: New approaches to psychology and interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J 1984. “A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement,” in Atkinson, JM and Heritage, J (eds.) Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 299–345.Google Scholar
Hinton, L, Franz, CE, Yeo, G, Levkoff, S 2005. “Conceptions of dementia in a multiethnic sample of family caregivers.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53: 1405–1410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, JS, Wardlow, H, Smith, DJ, Phinney, HM, Parikh, S, Nathanson, CA 2010. The secret: Love, marriage, and HIV. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Ho, K 2009. Liquidated: An ethnography of Wall Street. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G 1980. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Holland, D, Quinn, N (eds.) 1987. Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holstein, JA, Gubrium, JF 1997. “Active interviewing,” in Silverman, S (ed.) Qualitative research: Theory, method, and practice. London: Sage Publications, pp. 113–129.Google Scholar
Holt, E 1996. “Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 29: 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, E 2000. “Reporting and reacting: Concurrent responses to reported speech.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 33: 425–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holy, L 1987. “Description, generalization and comparison: Two paradigms,” in Holy, L (ed.) Comparative anthropology. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, H 2000. Interaction and the standardized survey interview: The living questionnaire. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hruschka, DJ 2009. “Defining cultural competence in context: Dyadic norms of friendship among U.S. high school students.” Ethos 37: 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hruschka, DJ, Maupin, JN 2012. “Competence, agreement, and luck: Testing whether some people agree more with a cultural truth than others do.” Field Methods 25: 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hruschka, DJ, Sibley, LM, Kalim, N, Edmonds, JK 2008. “When there is more than one answer key: Cultural theories of postpartum hemorrhage in Matlab, Bangladesh.” Field Methods 20: 315–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, SM, Bhopal, R 2004. “Self-report in clinical and epidemiological studies with non-English speakers: The challenge of language and culture.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 58: 618–622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchby, I, Wooffitt, R 1998. Conversation analysis: Principles, practices, and applications. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hyman, HH, Cobb, WJ, Feldman, JJ, Hart, CW, Stember, CH 1954. Interviewing in social research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D 1972. “Toward ethnographies of communication: The analysis of communicative events,” in Giglioli, PP (ed.) Language and social context. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin, pp. 21–44.Google Scholar
Hymes, D 1974. Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A 2009a. “Introduction: The sociolinguistics of stance,” in Jaffe, A. (ed.) Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A (ed.) 2009b. Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G 1989. “Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a “‘standard maximum’ silence of about one second in conversation,” in Rogers, D and Bull, P (eds.) Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 156–197.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G 2004. “Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction,” in Lerner, GH (ed.) Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenks, CJ 2011. Transcribing text and interaction: Issues in the representation of communication data. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, RB, Onwuegbuzie, AJ 2004. “Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come.” Educational Researcher 33: 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, RB, Onwuegbuzie, AJ, Turner, LA 2007. “Toward a definition of mixed methods research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1: 112–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, PN 1983. Mental models: Toward a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, B 2008. Discourse analysis, 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google ScholarPubMed
Johnstone, B 2009. “Stance, style, and the linguistic individual,” in Jaffe, A (ed.) Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, AH, Smith, SW 1998. “And people just you know, like ‘wow,’” in Jucker, AH and Ziv, Y (eds.) Discourse markers: Descriptions and theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahma, N, Toikka, A 2012. “Cultural map of Finland 2007: Analyzing cultural differences using multiple correspondence analysis.” Cultural Trends 21: 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, SY 2006. “Measurement of acculturation, scale formats, and language competence.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 37: 669–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karasz, A 2005. “Cultural differences in conceptual models of depression.” Social Science and Medicine 60: 1625–1635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katzman, R 1976. “The prevalence and malignancy of Alzheimer’s disease: A major killer.” Archives of Neurology 33: 217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katzman, R, Bick, KL 2000. “The rediscovery of Alzheimer’s disease during the 1960’s and 1970’s,” in Whitehouse, PJ, Maurer, K, and Ballenger, J (eds.) Concepts of Alzheimer’s disease: Biological, clinical, and cultural perspectives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 104–114.Google Scholar
Klassen, RM, Chong, WH, Huan, VS, Wong, I, Kates, A, Hannok, W 2008. “Motivation beliefs of secondary school teachers in Canada and Singapore: A mixed methods study.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24: 1919–1934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klewitz, G, Couper-Kuhlen, E 1999. “Quote-unquote: The role of prosody in the contextualization of reported speech sequences.” Pragmatics 9: 459–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koven, M 2014. “Interviewing: Practice, ideology, genre, and intertextuality.” Annual Review of Anthropology 43: 499–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krippendorf, KH 2012. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology, 3rd ed. Walnut Creek, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Krull, AC 2005. “First signs and normalizations: Caregiver routes to the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease.” Journal of Aging Studies 19: 407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W 1972. Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lai, J-S, Teresi, JA, Gershon, R 2005. “Procedures for the analysis of differential item functioning (DIF) for small sizes.” Evaluation and the Health Professions 28: 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landrine, H, Klonoff, EA 1995. “The African-American Acculturation Scale II: Cross-validation and short form.” Journal of Black Psychology 21: 124–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laroche, M, Kim, C, Hui, MK, Tomiuk, MA 1998. “Test of a non-linear relationship between linguistic acculturation and ethnic identification.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 29: 418–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, C 1982. “Directions for interlinear morphemic translation.” Folia Linguistica 16: 199–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, C 2004. “Interlinear morphemic glossing,” in Booij, G, Lehmann, C, Mugdan, J, and Skopeteas, S (eds.) Morphologie. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung 2. Halbband. Berlin: W. de Gruyter, pp. 1834–1857.Google Scholar
LePage, RB, Tabouret-Keller, A 1985. Acts of identity: Creole-based approaches to language and ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Le Roux, B, Rouanet, H 2004. Geometric data analysis: From correspondence analysis to structured data analysis. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Leventhal, H, Nerenz, D, Steele, DJ 1984. “Illness representations and coping with health threats,” in Baum, A, Taylor, SE, and Singer, JE (eds.) Handbook of psychology and health: Vol. IV. Social psychological aspects of health. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 219–252.Google Scholar
Levinson, SC 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Licht, MH 1995. “Multiple regression and correlation,” in Grimm, LG and Yarnold, PR (eds.) Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 19–64.Google Scholar
Lichtman, MV 2013. Qualitative research for the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lieberman, ES 2005. “Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research.” American Political Science Review 99: 435–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livney, MG, Clark, CM, Karlawish, JHT, Cartmell, S, Negron, M, Nunez, J, Xie, SX, Entenza-Cabrera, F, Vega, IE, Arnold, SE 2011. “Ethnoracial differences in the clinical characteristics of Alzheimer’s disease at initial presentation at an urban Alzheimer’s disease center.” American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 19: 430–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malinowski, B 1922 [1984]. Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Manning, C 2004. “African Americans,” in Grossman, JR, Keating, AD, Reiff, JL (eds.) Encyclopedia of Chicago. Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 5–7.Google Scholar
Mathis, T, Yule, G 1994. “Zero quotatives.” Discourse Processes 18: 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, D, van de Vijver, FJR (eds.) 2011. Cross-cultural research methods in psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maurer, K, Volk, S, Gerbaldo, H 2000. “Auguste D.: The history of Alois Alzheimer’s first case,” in Whitehouse, PJ and Maurer, K (eds.) Concepts of Alzheimer’s disease: Biological, clinical, and cultural perspectives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 5–29.Google Scholar
Maxcy, SJ 2003. “Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: The search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism,” in Tashakkori, A and Teddlie, C (eds.) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 51–90.Google Scholar
Miles, M, Huberman, A 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Mishler, E 1984. The discourse of medicine: Dialectics of medical interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Morgan, DL 2007. “Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1: 48–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, JM 1991. “Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation.” Nursing Research 40: 120–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, JM, Niehaus, L 2009. Mixed methods design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Muhr, T 2004. Atlas.ti: The knowledge workbench (Version 5.0). Berlin: Scientific Software Development.Google Scholar
Müller, N (ed.) 2006. Multilayered transcription. San Diego: Plural Publishing.Google Scholar
National Research Council 2004. Critical perspectives on racial and ethnic differences in health in late life. Edited by the Panel on Race, Health, and Ethnicity in Later Life. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.PubMed
Neisser, U 1976. Cognition and reality. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Neuendorf, KA 2001. The content analysis guidebook. Walnut Creek, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Nikander, P 2008. “Working with transcripts and translated data.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 5: 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E 1979. “Transcription as theory,” in Ochs, E and Schieffelin, B (eds.) Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 43–72.Google Scholar
Ochs, E 1990. “Indexicality and socialization,” in Stigler, JW, Shweder, RA, and Herdt, G (eds.) Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 287–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E 2004. “Narrative lessons,” in Duranti, A (ed.) A companion to linguistic anthropology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 269–289.Google Scholar
Ochs, E, Capps, L 2001. Living narrative: Creating lives in storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics 2003. Ethnic group statistics: A guide for the collection and classification of ethnicity data. Retrieved on November 25, 2013 from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160105160709/http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/index.html.
Ortiz, MA, Fitten, LJ, Cummings, LJ, Hwang, S, Fonseca, M 2006. “Neuropsychiatric and behavioral symptoms in a community sample of Hispanics with Alzheimer’s disease.” American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias 21: 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pachter, L, Weller, SC, Baer, RD, Garcia de Alba Garcia, J, Trotter, RT III, Glazer, M, Klein, R 2002. “Variations in asthma beliefs and practices among mainland Puerto Ricans, Mexican-Americans, Mexicans, and Guatemalans.” Journal of Asthma 39: 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, R 1921. “Sociology and the social sciences.” American Journal of Sociology 26: 401–424; 27: 1–21; 27: 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, A 1999. “New approaches to concepts in bilingual memory.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2: 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, DL, Clancy, KJ 1972. “Some effects of ‘social desirability’ in survey studies.” American Journal of Sociology 77(5): 921–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plano Clark, VL, Cresswell, J 2008. The mixed methods reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Platt, J 2012. “The history of the interview,” in Gubrium, JF, Holstein, JA, Marvasti, AB and McKinney, KD (eds.) The Sage handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, A 1986. “Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimating claims.” Human Studies 9: 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, GG, Plassman, BL, Burke, JR, Kabeto, MU, Langa, KM, Llewellyn, DJ, Rogers, MAM, Steffans, DC 2009. “Cognitive performance and informant reports in the diagnosis of cognitive impairment and dementia in African Americans and whites.” Alzheimer’s and Dementia 5: 445–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, J 1996. Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric, and social construction. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, J, Hepburn, A 2005. “Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 2: 281–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, J, Wetherell, M 1987. Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage Publications.Google ScholarPubMed
Powers, WR 2005. Transcription techniques for the spoken word. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
Purhonen, S, Gronow, J, Rhakoen, K 2011. “Highbrow culture in Finland: Knowledge and participation.” Acta Sociologica 54: 385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purhonen, S, Wright, D 2013. “Methodological issues in national-comparative research on cultural tastes: The case of cultural capital in the UK and Finland.” Cultural Sociology 7: 257–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabbins, P 2004. “Research update: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI): Definitions, diagnosis, and treatment possibilities.” Advanced Studies in Medicine 4: 290–296.Google Scholar
Rallis, SF, Rossman, GB 2003. “Mixed methods in evaluation contexts: A pragmatic framework,” in Tashakkori, A and Teddlie, C (eds.) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 491–512.Google Scholar
Randolph, J 2005. “Free marginal multirater kappa: An alternative to Fleiss’ fixed marginal multivariate kappa.” Paper presented at the Joensuu University Learning and Instructional Symposium (October 14–15, 2005), Joensuu, Finland.
Rapley, TJ, Antaki, C 1998. “‘What do you think about … ?’ Generating views in an interview.” Text 18: 587–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redeker, G 1990. “Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure.” Journal of Pragmatics 14: 367–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, JR 1999. African American vernacular English: Features, evolution, educational implications. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Riessman, CK 2008. Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Roberts, JS, Connell, CM 2000. “Illness representations among first-degree relatives of people with Alzheimer’s disease.” Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 14: 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, JS, Connell, CM, Cisewski, D, Hipps, YG, Demissie, S, Green, RC 2003. “Differences between African Americans and Whites in their perceptions of Alzheimer’s disease.” Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 17: 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romney, AK, Batchelder, WH, Weller, SC 1987. “Recent applications of cultural consensus theory.” American Behavioral Scientist 31: 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romney, AK, Weller, SC, Batchelder, WH 1986. “Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy.” American Anthropologist 88: 313–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R 1999. Philosophy and social hope. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Ross, NO 2004. Culture and cognition: Implications for theory and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Roulston, K 2006. “Close encounters of the ‘CA’ kind: A review of the literature analyzing talk in research interviews.” Qualitative Research 6: 535–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, GW, Bernard, HR 2003. “Techniques to identify themes.” Field Methods 15: 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H 1985. “On doing ‘being ordinary’,” in Atkinson, JM (ed.) Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 413–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H 1987. “The preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation,” in Button, G and Lee, JRE (eds.) Talk and social organization. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. 54–69.Google Scholar
Sacks, H 1992. Lectures on conversation (Vol. 2). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, H, Schegloff, EA 1979. “Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction,” in Psathas, G. (ed.) Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington, pp. 15–21.Google Scholar
Sacks, H, Schegloff, EA, Jefferson, G 1974. “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language 50: 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, S, Nomura, N, Noguchi, Y, Tezuka, I 1996. “Translatability of family concepts into the Japanese culture: Using the Family Environment Scale.” Family Process 35: 239–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandelowski, M 2003. “Tables or tableaux? The challenges of writing and reading mixed methods studies,” in Tashakkori, A and Teddlie, C (eds.) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 321–350.Google Scholar
Sarangi, S 2003. “Institutional, professional, and lifeworld frames in interview talk,” in van den Berg, H and Houtkoop-Steenstra, H (eds.) Analyzing race talk: Multidisciplinary perspectives on the research interview. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64–84.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, NC, Maynard, DW 1996. “From paradigm to prototype and back again: Interactive aspects of ‘cognitive processing’ in standardized survey interviews,” in Schwarz, N and Sudman, S (eds.) Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 65–88.Google Scholar
Schank, RC 1982. Dynamic memory: A theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schank, RC, Abelson, RP 1977. Scripts, plans, goals, and understandings: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D 1987. Discourse markers. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D 1994. Approaches to discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schneider, EW 2004. A handbook of varieties of English: A multimedia reference tool. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schrauf, RW 1997. “!Costalero quiero ser! Autobiographical memory and the oral life story of a Holy Week Brother in Southern Spain.” Ethos 25: 428–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrauf, RW 2002. “Comparing cultures within subjects: A cognitive account of acculturation as a framework for cross-cultural study.” Anthropological Theory 2: 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrauf, RW 2009. “Intracultural variation in cross-cultural gerontology.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 29: 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrauf, RW, Iris, M 2011a. “A direct comparison of popular models of normal memory loss and Alzheimer’s disease in samples of African Americans, Mexican Americans, and refugees and immigrants from the Former Soviet Union.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 59: 628–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schrauf, RW, Iris, M 2011b. “Using consensus analysis to investigate cultural models of Alzheimer’s disease,” in Kronenfeld, D, Bennardo, G, de Munck, V, and Fischer, MD (eds.) A companion to cognitive anthropology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 548–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrauf, RW, Iris, M 2012. “Very long pathways to diagnosis among African Americans and Hispanics with memory and behavioral problems associated with dementia.” Dementia 11: 726–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrauf, RW, Iris, M 2014a. “How to construct a case of Alzheimer’s disease in three languages: Case-based reasoning in narrative gerontology.” Ageing and Society 34: 280–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrauf, RW, Iris, M 2014b. “‘What they’re said to say’: The discursive construction of Alzheimer’s disease by older adults,” in Schrauf, RW and Muller, N (eds.) Dialogue and dementia: Cognitive and communicative resources for engagement. New York: Taylor and Francis, pp. 27–57.Google Scholar
Schrauf, RW, Navarro, E 2005. “Using existing tests and scales in the field.” Field Methods 17: 373–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrauf, RW, Sanchez, J 2008. “Using freelisting to identify, assess, and characterize age differences in shared cultural domains.” Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 63B: S385–S393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, R, Burgio, L, Burns, R, Eisdorfer, C, Gallagher-Thompson, D, Gitlin, LN, Feeney Mahoney, D 2003. “Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer’s Caregiver Health (REACH): Overview, site-specific outcomes and future directions.” The Gerontologist 43: 514–520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schuman, H, Converse, JM 1971. “The effects of Black and White interviewers on black responses in 1968.” Public Opinion Quarterly 35: 44–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, N 1996. Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods, and the logic of conversation. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Scott, J 2013. Social network analysis, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google ScholarPubMed
Searle, JR 1969. Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selting, M, Auer, P, Barth-Weingarten, D, Bergmann, J, Bergmann, P, Birkner, K, Couper-Kuhlen, E, Depperman, A, Gilles, P, Gunther, S, Hartung, M, Kern, F, Mertzlufft, C, Meyer, C, Morek, M, Oberzaucher, F, Peters, J, Quashoff, U, Schutte, W, Stukenbroch, A, Uhmann, S 2009. “Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 GAT 2.” Gesprächsforschung 10: 353–402.Google Scholar
Shadlen, M-F, Larson, EB, Gibbbons, L, McCormick, WC, Teri, L 1999. “Alzheimer’s disease symptoms in blacks and whites.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 47: 482–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, C 1999. “A framework for the study of coping, illness behaviour and outcomes.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 29: 1246–1255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shimpuku, Y, Norr, KF 2012. “Working with interpreters in cross-cultural qualitative research in the context of a developing country: Systematic literature review.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 68: 1692–1706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shulman, N, Adams, B 2002. “A comparison of Russian and British attitudes towards mental health problems in the community.” International Journal of Social Psychiatry 48: 266–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, J, Stivers, T (eds.) 2014. The handbook of conversation analysis (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics). Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Silva, E, Warde, A, Wright, D 2009. “Using mixed methods for analyzing culture: The cultural capital and social exclusion project.” Cultural Sociology 3: 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, S 1993. Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for interpreting talk, text, and interaction. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M 1976. “Shifter, linguistic categories, and cultural description,” in Basso, KH and Selby, HA (eds.) Meaning in anthropology. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 11–56.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M 2003a. “Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life.” Language and Communication 23: 193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M 2003b. “Translation, transduction, transformation: Skating ‘glossando’ on thin semiotic ice,” in Rubel, PG and Rosman, A (eds.) Translating cultures: Perspectives on translation and anthropology. New York: Berg, pp. 75–105.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M 2004. “‘Cultural’ concepts and the language-culture nexus.” Current Anthropology 45: 621–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M 2006. “Old wine, new ethnographic lexicography.” The Annual Review of Anthropology 35: 481–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sink, KM, Covinsky, KE, Newcomer, R, Yaffe, K 2004. “Ethnic differences in the prevalence and patterns of dementia-related behaviors.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 52: 1277–1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, HJ, Chen, J, Liu, X 2008. “Language and rigor in qualitative research: Problems and principles in analyzing data collected in Mandarin.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 8(44). Retrieved on November 11, 2015 from www.biomedcentral.com/1471–2288/8/44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, TW 2004. “Evaluating cross-national survey instruments,” in Presser, S, Rothgeb, J, Couper, MP, Lessler, JT, Martin, E, and Singer, E (eds.) Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 431–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spradley, JP 1979. The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Squires, A 2008. “Language barriers and qualitative nursing research: Methodological considerations.” International Nursing Review 55: 265–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Squires, A 2009. “Methodological challenges in cross-language qualitative research: A research review.” International Journal of Nursing Studies 46: 277–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stange, KC, Crabtree, BF, Miller, WL 2006. “Publishing multimethod research.” Annals of Family Medicine 4(4): 292–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephenson, M 2000. “Development and validation of the Stephenson Multigroup Acculturation Scale (SMAS).” Psychological Assessment 12: 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T 2008. “Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41: 31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, S, Feiz, P 2014 Discourse analysis: Putting our worlds into words. New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
Suchman, L, Jordan, B 1990. “Interactional troubles in face-to-face survey interviews.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 85: 232–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swartz, D 1997. Culture and power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Szczepek Reed, B 2011. Analysing conversation: An introduction to prosody. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taggart, F, Friede, T, Welch, S, Clarke, A, Johnson, M, Stewart-Brown, S 2013. “Cross-cultural evaluation of the Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS) – a mixed methods study.” Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 11: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tannen, D (ed.) 1993. Framing in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tashakkori, A, Cresswell, JW 2007. “Exploring the nature of research questions in mixed methods research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1: 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tashakkori, A, Teddie, C 2010. SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tashakkori, A, Teddlie, C 1998. Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Teddlie, C, Tashakkori, A 2009. Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Teddlie, C, Yu, F 2007. “Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1: 77–100.Google Scholar
Temple, B 1997. “Watch your tongue: Issues in translation and cross-cultural research.” Sociology 31: 607–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temple, B 2002. “Crossed wires: Interpreters, translators, and bilingual workers in cross-language research.” Qualitative Health Research 12: 844–854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Temple, B 2006. “Grasping at context: Cross-language qualitative research as secondary data analysis.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 7(4). Retrieved October 19, 2015 from www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/176/393.Google Scholar
Temple, B, Young, A 2004. “Qualitative research and translation dilemmas.” Qualitative Research 4: 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tennant, R, Hiller, L, Fishwick, R, Plant, S, Joseph, S, Welch, S, Parkinson, J, Secker, J, Stewart-Brown, S 2007. “The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation.” Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 5: 63–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tourangeau, R, Rips, LJ, Rasinski, K 2000. The psychology of survey response. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trotter, R, Weller, SC, Baer, RD, Pachter, L, Glazer, M, Garcia de Alba Garcia, J, Klein, R 1999. “Consensus theory model of AIDS/SIDA beliefs in four latino populations.” AIDS Education and Prevention 11: 414–426.Google ScholarPubMed
Twinn, S 1997. “An exploratory study examining the influence of translation on the validity and the reliability of qualitative data in nursing research.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 26: 418–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van den Berg, H 1996. “Frame analysis of open interviews on interethnic relations.” Bulletin de Methodologique Sociologique 53: 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Vijver, F, Leung, K 1997. Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
van de Vijver, FJR, Leung, KK 2006. “Equivalence and bias: A review of concepts, models, and data analytic procedures,” in Matsumoto, D and Van de Vijver, FJR (eds.) Cross-cultural research methods in psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17–45.Google Scholar
van de Vijver, FJR, van Hemert, DA, Poortinga, YH (eds.) 2008. Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Wallin, A, Ahlstrom, G 2006. “Cross-cultural interview studies using interpreters: Systematic literature review.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 26: 723–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, S, Faust, K 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, MF, Moore, RP 1981. “Ethnicity-of-interviewer effects on ethnic respondents.” Public Opinion Quarterly 45: 245–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, LC, Botelho, EM, Tenstedt, SL 2011. “Race and ethnic differences in health beliefs about lower urinary tract symptoms.” Nursing Research 60: 165–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weller, S 1987. “Shared knowledge, intracultural variation, and knowledge aggregation.” The American Behavioral Scientist 31: 178–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, S 2007. “Cultural consensus theory: Applications and frequently asked questions.” Field Methods 19: 339–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, S, Mann, NC 1997. “Assessing rater performance without a ‘Gold Standard’ using consensus theory.” Medical Decision Making 17: 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, SC, Baer, RD, Garcia de Alba Garcia, J, Glazer, M, Trotter, R II, Salcedo Rocha, AL, Klein, RE, Pachter, LM 2015. “Variation and persistence in Latin American Beliefs about evil eye.” Cross Cultural Research 49: 174–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetherell, M 2003. “Racism and the analysis of cultural resources in interviews,” in Van den Berg, H, Wetherell, M, and Houtkoop-Steenstra, H (eds.) Analyzing race talk: Multidisciplinary perspectives on the research interview. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–30.Google Scholar
Wetherell, M, Potter, J 1992. Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, PJ, George, D 2008. The myth of Alzheimer’s disease: What you aren’t being told about today’s most dreaded diagnosis. New York: Saint Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Wilce, JM 2009. “Medical discourse.” Annual Review of Anthropology 38: 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, A, Glick-Schiller, N 2002. “Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation-state building, migration, and the social sciences.” Global Networks 2: 301–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L 1953. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wortham, SE 2001. Narratives in action: A strategy for research and analysis. New York: Teachers College.Google Scholar
Zentella, AC 1997. Growing up bilingual: Puerto Rican children in New York. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar