Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-kw98b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-22T10:13:06.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part 2 - Quantitative Approaches to Measuring Corporate Compliance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2022

Melissa Rorie
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Benjamin van Rooij
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam, School of Law
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Measuring Compliance
Assessing Corporate Crime and Misconduct Prevention
, pp. 91 - 186
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abbott, Pamela and Sapsford, Roger. 1993. Studying policy and practice: The use of vignettes. Nursing Research, 1, 81.Google Scholar
Aguinis, Herman and Bradley, Kyle J.. 2014. Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational Research Methods, 17, 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Cheryl S. and Becker, Henry J.. 1978. The use of vignettes in survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 93104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andes, Scott and Correa, Daniel. 2017. November 2. Comment: Boosting research funding as uncertainty reigns. Nature Index 2017 United States. www.nature.com/collections/qqmnjbjjdb.Google Scholar
Atzmüller, Christiane and Steiner, Peter M.. 2010. Experimental vignette studies in survey research, Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 6, 128.Google Scholar
Auspurg, Katrin and Jäckle, Annette. 2012. First Equals Most Important? Order Effects in Vignette-Based Measurement. University of Essex: Institute for Social and Economic Research.Google Scholar
Auspurg, Katrin, Hinz, Thomas, and Liebig, Stefan. 2009. Complexity, Learning Effects, and Plausibility of Vignettes in Factorial Surveys. Bibliothek der Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
Aviram, Hadar. 2012. What would you do? Conducting web-based factorial vignette surveys. In Gideon, Lior, ed., Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Beck, Lisa and Ajzen, Icek. 1991. Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25(3), 285301.Google Scholar
Chu, Amanda M. Y., So, Mike K. P., and Chung, Ray S. W.. 2018. Applying the randomized response technique in business ethics research: The misuse of information systems resources in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 195212.Google Scholar
Drummond, Frances J., Sharp, Linda, Carsin, Anne-Elie, Kelleher, Tracy, and Comber., Harry 2018. Questionnaire order significantly increased response to a postal survey sent to primary care physicians. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61, 177–85.Google Scholar
Eifler, Stefanie. 2010. Validity of a factorial survey approach to the analysis of criminal behavior. Methodology, 6, 139.Google Scholar
Exum, M. Lyn, Bailey, Diana, and Wright, Eric L.. 2014. False positive and false negative rates in self-reported intentions to offend: A replication and extension. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Exum, M. Lyn, Turner, Michael G., and Hartman., Jennifer L. 2012. Self-reported intentions to offend: All talk and no action? American Journal of Criminal Justice, 17, 523.Google Scholar
Faia, Michael A. 1980. The vagaries of the vignette world: A comment on Alves and Rossi. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 951.Google Scholar
Falk, Armin, Meier, Stephan, and Zehnder., Christian 2013. Do lab experiments misrepresent social preferences? The case of self-selected student samples. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(4), 839–52.Google Scholar
Finch, Janet. 1987. The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology, 21, 105.Google Scholar
Fisher, Sarah. 2020. September 4. Employee satisfaction surveys: Best practices and sample questions. Qualtrics Blog. www.qualtrics.com/blog/employee-satisfaction-survey/.Google Scholar
Gould, Dinah. 1996. Using vignettes to collect data for nursing research studies: How valid are the findings? Journal of Clinical Nursing, 5, 207.Google Scholar
Green, Donald E. 1989. Measures of illegal behavior in individual-level deterrence research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 26(3), 253–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Robert G., Murphy, Katrina D., and Snyder., Shelita M. 2000. Should demographics be placed at the end or at the beginning of mailed questionnaires? An empirical answer to a persistent methodological question. Social Work Research, 24(4), 237–41.Google Scholar
Hox, Joop J., Kreft, Ita G. G., and Hermkens, Piet L. J.. 1991. The analysis of factorial surveys. Sociological Methods and Research, 19, 493.Google Scholar
Hughes, Jennifer L., Camden, Abigail A., and Yangchen., Tenzin 2016. Rethinking and updating demographic questions: Guidance to improve descriptions of research samples. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 21(3), 138–51.Google Scholar
Hughes, Rhidian and Huby, Meg. 2012. The construction and interpretation of vignettes in social research. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 11, 36.Google Scholar
Jehn, Karen A. and Jonsen., Karsten 2010. A multimethod approach to the study of sensitive organizational issues. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(4), 313–41.Google Scholar
Johnson, David R. 2018, June 5. With federal funding for science on the decline, what’s the role of a profit motive in research? The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/with-federal-funding-for-science-on-the-decline-whats-the-role-of-a-profit-motive-in-research–93322.Google Scholar
Jones, Thomas V., Gerrity, Martha S., and Earp, JoAnne. 1990. Written case simulations: Do they predict physicians’ behavior? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43(8), 805–15.Google Scholar
Judd, Scott, O’Rourke, Eric, and Grant, Adam. 2018. Employee surveys are still one of the best ways to measure engagement. Harvard Business Review. March 14. https://hbr.org/2018/03/employee-surveys-are-still-one-of-the-best-ways-to-measure-engagement.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Jay P. and Ticknor., Bobbie 2012. Studying corporate crime: Making the case for virtual reality. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 7(1), 416–30.Google Scholar
Kirwan, J. R., De Saintonge, D. C., Joyce, C. R., and Currey, H. L.. 1983. Clinical judgment in rheumatoid arthritis. I. Rheumatologists’ opinions and the development of “paper patients.” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 42(6), 644–7.Google Scholar
Kreuter, Frauke, Presser, Stanley, and Tourangeau, Roger. 2008. Social desirability bias in CATI, IVR, and Web surveys the effects of mode and question sensitivity. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 847.Google Scholar
Langley, G. Ross, Tritchler, David L., Llewellyn-Thomas, Hilary A., and Till, James E.. 1991. Use of written cases to study factors associated with regional variations in referral rates. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44(4), 391402.Google Scholar
Martin, Susan Lorde. 2015. Compliance officers: More jobs, more responsibility, more liability. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 29, 169–98.Google Scholar
McLaren, Nicholas. 2015. The methodology in empirical sales ethics research: 1980–2010. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 121–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, Michael S., Payne, G. Tyge, and Evert, Robert E.. 2016. Organizational ethics research: A systematic review of methods and analytical techniques. Journal of Business Ethics, 134, 429–43.Google Scholar
Murray, Glenn F. and Erickson., Patricia G. 1987. Cross-sectional versus longitudinal research: An empirical comparison of projected and subsequent criminality. Social Science Research, 16(2), 107–18.Google Scholar
Nagin, Daniel S. and Pogarsky., Greg 2003. An experimental investigation of deterrence: Cheating, self-serving bias, and impulsivity. Criminology, 41(1), 167–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nix, Justin, Pickett, Justin T., Baek, Hyunin, and Alpert., Geoffrey P. 2019. Police research, officer surveys, and response rates. Policing and Society, 29(5), 530–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oll, Josua, Hahn, Rüdiger, Reimsbach, Daniel, and Kotzian., Peter 2018. Tackling complexity in business and society research: The methodological and thematic potential of factorial surveys. Business and Society, 57(1), 2659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Christine and Nielsen., Vibeke 2009. The challenge of empirical research on business compliance in regulatory capitalism. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 5, 4570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, Justin T., Cullen, Frank T., Bushway, Shawn D., Chiricos, Ted, and Alpert., Geoffrey 2018. The response rate test: Nonresponse bias and the future of survey research in criminology and criminal justice. The Criminologist, 43(1), 711.Google Scholar
Pogarsky, Greg. 2004. Projected offending and contemporaneous rule-violation: Implications for heterotypic continuity. Criminology, 42, 111.Google Scholar
Randall, Donna M. and Gibson, Annetta M.. 1990. Methodology in business ethics research: A review and critical assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(6), 457–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorie, Melissa and West, Matthew. 2020. Can “focused deterrence” produce more effective ethics codes? An experimental study. Journal of White Collar and Corporate Crime. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631309X20940664.Google Scholar
Rorie, M., Alper, M., Schell-Busey, N., & Simpson, S. S. (2018). Using meta-analysis under conditions of definitional ambiguity: The case of corporate crime. Criminal Justice Studies, 31(1), 3861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorie, Melissa, Simpson, Sally S., Cohen, Mark, and Vandenbergh, Michael. 2018. Examining procedural justice and legitimacy in corporate offending and beyond-compliance behavior: The efficacy of direct and indirect regulatory interactions. Law & Policy, 40(2), 172–95.Google Scholar
Rossi, Peter H. 1951. The application of latent structure analysis to the study of social stratification. Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Rossi, Peter H. 1979. Vignette analysis: Uncovering the normative structure of complex judgments. In King, Robert, Samuel, James, and Rossi, Peter H., eds., Qualitative and Quantitative Social Research: Papers in Honor of Paul F Lazarsfeld. New York: Free Press, 176–86.Google Scholar
Rossi, Peter H. and Anderson, Andy B.. 1982. The factorial survey approach: An introduction. In Rossi, Peter H. and Nock, Steven L., eds., Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Rossi, Peter H. and Nock, Steven L.. 1982. Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sampson, Robert J. 2010. Gold standard myths: Observations on the experimental turn in quantitative criminology. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(4), 489500.Google Scholar
Schindler, Pamela. 2019. Business Research Methods, 13th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schutt, Russell K. 2015. Investigating the Social World, 8th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Teclaw, Robert, Price, Mark C., and Osatuke., Katerine 2012. Demographic question placement: Effect on item response rates and means of a Veterans Health Administration survey. Journal of Business Psychology, 27, 281–90.Google Scholar
Tsingou, Eleni. 2018. New governors on the block: The rise of anti-money laundering professionals. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 69, 191205.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 2009. Self-regulatory approaches to white-collar crime: The importance of legitimacy and procedural justice. In The Criminology of White-Collar Crime. New York: Springer, pp. 195216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallander, Lisa. 2009. 25 years of factorial surveys in sociology: A review. Social Science Research, 38(3), 505–20.Google Scholar
Weber, Eleanor, Sellers, Deborah, and Rossi, Peter. 1988. Vig-Write: The PC Vignette Generating Program. Amherst, MA: Social and Demographic Research Institute, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Weisburd, David. 2003. Ethical practice and evaluation of interventions in crime and justice: The moral imperative for randomized trials. Evaluation Review, 27(3), 336–54.Google Scholar
Wilson, Jonathan. 2014. Essentials of Business Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Wouters, Kristel, Maesschalck, Jeroen, Peeters, Carel F. W., and Roosen, Marijke. 2014. Methodological issues in the design of online surveys for measuring unethical work behavior: Recommendations on the basis of a split-ballot experiment. Journal of Business Ethics, 120, 275–89.Google Scholar
Yacoubian, George S., VanderWall, Kristine L., Johnson, Regina J., Urbach, Blake J., and Peters, Ronald J.. 2003. Comparing the validity of self-reported recent drug use between adult and juvenile arrestees.Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 35(2), 279–84.Google Scholar
Zerbe, Wilfred J. and Paulhus, Delroy L.. 1987. Socially desirable responding in organizational behavior: A reconception. Academy of Management Review, 12, 250.Google Scholar

References

Burtless, Gary. 1995. The case for randomized field trials in economic and policy research. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 6384.Google Scholar
Congdon, William J., Kling, Jeffrey R., Ludwig, Jens, and Mullainathan., Sendhil 2017. Social policy: Mechanism experiments and policy evaluations. In Banerjee, Abhijit Vinayak and Duflo, Esther, eds., Handbook of Field Experiments. Elsevier Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Feldman, Yuval and Lobel, Orly. 2008. Decentralized enforcement in organizations: An experimental approach. Regulation & Governance, 2, 165–92.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S. and Green, Donald P.. 2008. Field experiments and natural experiments. In Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford Handbooks Online, doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.003.0015.Google Scholar
Guttentag, Michael D., Porath, Christine L., and Fraidin, Samuel N.. 2008. Brandeis’ policeman: Results from a laboratory experiment on how to prevent corporate fraud. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 5(2), 239–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallsworth, Michael. 2014. The use of field experiments to increase tax compliance. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(4), 658–79.Google Scholar
Harrison, Glenn W. and List, John A.. 2004. Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(4), 1009–55.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J. and Smith, Jeffrey A.. 1995. Assessing the case for social experiments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 85110.Google Scholar
Malesky, Edmund and Taussig, Markus. 2019. Participation, government legitimacy, and regulatory compliance in emerging economies: A firm-level field experiment in Vietnam. American Political Science Review, 113(2), 530–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, Rebecca B. and Williams, Kenneth C.. 2008. Experimentation in political science. In Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford Handbooks Online, doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.003.0014.Google Scholar
Sampson, Robert J. 2010. Gold standard myths: Observations on the experimental turn in quantitative criminology. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 489500.Google Scholar
Schutt, Russell K. 2015. Investigating the Social World: The Process and Practice of Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Stokols, Daniel, McMahan, Shari, Clitheroe, H. C. Jr., and Wells, Meredith. 2001. Enhancing corporate compliance with worksite safety and health legislation. Journal of Safety Research, 32, 441–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorley, Dane R. (in press). Compliance experiments in the field: Features, limitations, and examples. In Rooij, Benjamin van and Sokol, D. Daniel, eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Compliance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vollaard, Ben and van Ours, Jan C.. 2011. Does regulation of built‐in security reduce crime? Evidence from a natural experiment. The Economic Journal, 121(552), 485504.Google Scholar
Weisburd, David. 2010. Justifying the use of non-experimental methods and disqualifying the use of randomized controlled trials: Challenging folklore in evaluation research in crime and justice. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 6, 209–27.Google Scholar
Weisburd, David, Lum, Cynthia M., and Petrosino, Anthony. 2001. Does research design affect study outcomes in criminal justice? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578(1), 5070.Google Scholar
Weisburd, David, Petrosino, Anthony, and Fronius, Trevor. 2013. Randomized experiments in criminology and criminal justice. In Bruinsma, Gerben and Weisburd, David, eds., Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Welsh, Brandon C., Braga, Anthony A., and Bruinsma, Gerben J. N.. 2013. New perspectives and developments in experimental criminology. Policing, 7(4), 411–18.Google Scholar

References

Ariel, Barak. 2012. Deterrence and moral persuasion effects on corporate tax compliance: Findings from a randomized controlled trial. Criminology, 50(1), 27–69.Google Scholar
Cambridge Academic Content Dictionary. Cambridge University Press. 2020. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/ethics.Google Scholar
Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary & Thesaurus. Cambridge University Press. 2020. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/compliance.Google Scholar
Chen, Hui and Soltes, Eugene. 2018. Why compliance programs fail – and how to fix them. Harvard Business Review, March–April. https://hbr.org/2018/03/why-compliance-programs-fail.Google Scholar
Cutter, Henry. 2017. Hui Chen sparks debate over anti-bribery standard. Wall Street Journal, October 24. https://blogs.wsj.com/riskandcompliance/2017/10/24/the-morning-risk-report-hui-chen-sparks-debate-over-anti-bribery-standard/.Google Scholar
Ershagi Hames, Marsha, Khoury, Omar R., and Caserta, Lisa. 2018. MGM Resorts International: Journey to the Future of Mobile & Augmented Reality. SCCE Compliance & Ethics Forum, October 22. https://assets.corporatecompliance.org/Portals/1/PDF/Resources/past_handouts/CEI/2018/208_ershaghi-hames-khoury-caserta_2.pdf.Google Scholar
Feldman, Yuval. 2018. The Law of Good People. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Brandon L. and Mitchell, Gregory. 2021. Testing compliance. Law and Contemporary Problems, 83, 4784.Google Scholar
Grand View Research. 2020. Enterprise Governance, Risk and Compliance Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report by Component, by Software, by Service, by Enterprise Type, by Vertical, and Segment Forecasts, 2020–2027. www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/enterprise-governance-risk-compliance-egrc-market.Google Scholar
Koehler, Mike. 2014. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ripples. American University Business Law Review, 3(3),391.Google Scholar
Langevoort, Donald C. 2018. Behavioral ethics, behavioral compliance. In Arlen, Jennifer, ed., Research Handbook on Corporate Crime and Financial Misdealing. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Rogers, Victor. 2018. Steve Salbu talks ethics: Georgia tech expert talks workplace ethics and coming back from crisis. Georgia Tech News, October 29. https://news.gatech.edu/features/steve-salbu-talks-ethics.Google Scholar
Rorie, Melissa, Simpson, Sally S., and Boppre, Breanna. 2018. Factorial survey research in the study of environmental regulatory processes. In van Boom, Willem, Desmet, Pieter M. A., and Mascini, Peter, eds., Empirical Legal Research in Action. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
US Department of Justice. 2012. A Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/criminal-fraud/legacy/2015/01/16/guide.pdf.Google Scholar
Walden, Vincent. 2018. Profit & loss-of-one. Fraud Magazine, January/February. www.fraud-magazine.com/article.aspx?id=4295000560.Google Scholar
Weiss, Art. 2014. Compliance and ethics – they’re the same thing right? The Compliance and Ethics Blog, June 19. https://complianceandethics.org/compliance-ethics-theyre-thing-right.Google Scholar

References

Charles, Valerie. 2020. Microsoft’s Alan Gibson on the Power of Compliance Data. GAN Integrity, Connected CCO Blog. www.ganintegrity.com/blog/microsofts-alan-gibson-on-the-power-of-compliance-data/.Google Scholar
Chen, Hui and Soltes, Eugene. 2018. Why compliance programs fail: And how to fix them. Harvard Business Review, 96(2), 116–25.Google Scholar
Deloitte/Compliance Week. 2017. In Focus: 2016 Compliance Trends Survey.Google Scholar
Garrett, Brandon and Mitchell, Gregory. 2020. Testing compliance. Law & Contemporary Problems, 83, 4784.Google Scholar
Gartner, Legal and Compliance Research Team 2020. Pragmatic Analytics Rollout (Microsoft). Gartner case study, August 4.Google Scholar
Gates, Bill. 2013. Bill Gates: My plan to fix the world’s biggest problems. Wall Street Journal, January 25.Google Scholar
Gibson, Alan. 2020. Four Principles Underlying Microsoft’s Compliance Analytics Program. Anti-Corruption-Report.Google Scholar
Haugh, Todd. 2018. The power few of corporate compliance. Georgia Law Review, 53(1), 129–96.Google Scholar
Park, Jihwon. 2020. Does compliance training decrease corporate misconduct? Evidence from field data. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
Soltes, Eugene. 2018. Evaluating the effectiveness of corporate compliance programs: Establishing a model for prosecutors, courts, and firms. NYU Journal of Law & Business, 14(3), 9651011.Google Scholar
Soltes, Eugene. 2019. The frequency of corporate misconduct: Public enforcement versus private reality. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(4), 923–38.Google Scholar
Soltes, Eugene. 2020. Paper versus practice: A field investigation of integrity hotlines. Journal of Accounting Research, 58(2), 429–72.Google Scholar
Soltes, Eugene. 2021. The professionalization of compliance. In van Rooij, Benjamin and Sokol, D. Daniel, eds., Cambridge Handbook of Compliance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
US Department of Justice Criminal Division. 2020. Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs, updated June.Google Scholar
US Sentencing Commission (USSC). 2018. Guidelines Manual.Google Scholar

References

Alberini, Anna and Austin, David H.. 1999. Strict liability as a deterrent in toxic waste management: Empirical evidence from accident and spill data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 38(1), 2048.Google Scholar
Almer, Christian and Goeschl, Timo. 2010. Environmental crime and punishment: Empirical evidence from the German Penal Code. Land Economics, 86, 707–26.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. 1968. Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–72.Google Scholar
Blundell, Wesley, Evans, Mary, and Stafford, Sarah L.. 2020. Regulating Hazardous Wastes under U.S. Environmental Federalism: The Role of State Resources. Working Paper.Google Scholar
De Marchi, Scott and Hamilton, James T.. 2006. Assessing the accuracy of self-reported data: An evaluation of the toxics release inventory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 32, 5776.Google Scholar
Deily, Mary and Gray, Wayne. 1991. Enforcement of pollution regulations in a declining industry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 21, 260–74.Google Scholar
Earnhart, Dietrich. 2004. Regulatory factors shaping environmental performance at publicly owned treatment plants. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48, 655–81.Google Scholar
Evans, Mary 2016. The Clean Air Act watch list: An enforcement and compliance natural experiment. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 3(3), 627–65.Google Scholar
Evans, Mary, Liu, Lirong, and Stafford, Sarah L.. 2011. A facility-level analysis of the long-term consequences of environmental auditing among hazardous waste generators. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 40(3), 279302.Google Scholar
Feinstein, Jonathan S. 1990. Detection controlled estimation. Journal of Law and Economics, 33(1), 233–76.Google Scholar
Friesen, Lana. 2003. Targeting enforcement to improve compliance with environmental regulations. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46, 7285.Google Scholar
Giles, Cynthia. 2013. Next Generation Compliance. The Environmental Forum, Environmental Law Institute, September–October.Google Scholar
Glicksman, Robert and Earnhart, Dietrich. 2007. The comparative effectiveness of government interventions on environmental performance in the chemical industry. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 26, 317–71.Google Scholar
Gray, Wayne and Shadbegian, Ronald. 2005. When and why do plants comply? Paper mills in the 1980s. Law and Policy, 27, 238–61.Google Scholar
Gray, Wayne and Shadbegian, Ronald. 2007. The environmental performance of polluting plants: A spatial analysis. Journal of Regional Science, 47, 6384.Google Scholar
Gray, Wayne and Shimshack, Jay P.. 2011. The effectiveness of environmental monitoring and enforcement: A review of the empirical evidence. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 5(1), 324.Google Scholar
Gupta, Shreekant, Saksena, Shalini, and Bari, Omer F.. 2019. Environmental enforcement and compliance in developing countries: Evidence from India. World Development, 117(C), 313–27.Google Scholar
Hamilton, James T. 1996. Going by the informal book: The EPA’s use of informal rules in enforcing hazardous waste laws. Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Growth, 7, 109–55.Google Scholar
Harford, Jon and Harrington, Winston. 1991. A reconsideration of enforcement leverage when penalties are restricted. Journal of Public Economics, 45, 391–5.Google Scholar
Harrington, Winston. 1988. Enforcement leverage when penalties are restricted. Journal of Public Economics, 37, 2953.Google Scholar
Helland, Eric. 1998a. Environmental protection in the federalist system: The political economy of NPDES inspections. Economic Inquiry, 36, 305–19.Google Scholar
Helland, Eric. 1998b. The enforcement of pollution control laws: Inspections, violations, and self-reporting. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 141–53.Google Scholar
Heyes, Anthony. 2002. A theory of filtered enforcement. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 43, 3446.Google Scholar
Innes, Robert and Mitra, Arnab. 2015. Parties, politics, and regulation: Evidence from Clean Air Act enforcement. Economic Inquiry, 53(1), 522–39.Google Scholar
Kelderman, Keene, Shaeffer, Eric, Pelton, Tom, Phillips, Ari, and Bernhardt, Courtney. 2019. The Thin Green Line: Cuts in State Pollution Control Agencies Threaten Public Health. Environmental Integrity Project: Washington, DC. https://environmentalintegrity.org/reports/the-thin-green-line/.Google Scholar
Kleit, Andrew, Pierce, Meredith, and Hill, R. Carter. 1998. Environmental protection, agency motivations, and rent extraction. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 13, 121–37.Google Scholar
Laplante, Benoit and Rilstone, Paul. 1996. Environmental inspections and emissions of the pulp and paper industry in Quebec. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31, 1936.Google Scholar
Magat, Wesley A. and Kip Viscusi, W.. 1990. Effectiveness of the EPA’s regulatory enforcement: The case of industrial effluent standards. The Journal of Law & Economics, 33(2), 331–60.Google Scholar
Muehlenbachs, Lucija, Staubli, Stefan, and Cohen, Mark A.. 2016. The impact of team inspections on enforcement and deterrence. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 3(1), 159204.Google Scholar
Russell, Clifford S., Harrington, Winston, and Vaughan, William J.. 1986. Economic Models of Monitoring and Enforcement: Enforcing Pollution Control Laws. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, Eric and Pelton, Tom. 2019. Less Enforcement: Communities at Risk. The Environmental Integrity Project: Washington: DC. https://environmentalintegrity.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/EIP-Enforcement-Report.pdf.Google Scholar
Shimshack, Jay P. 2014. The economics of environmental monitoring and enforcement: A review. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 6, 339–60.Google Scholar
Shimshack, Jay and Ward, Michael B.. 2005. Regulator reputation, enforcement, and environmental compliance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50, 519–40.Google Scholar
Shimshack, Jay and Ward, Michael B.. 2008. Enforcement and over-compliance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 55(1), 90105.Google Scholar
Stafford, Sarah L. 2002. The effect of punishment on firm compliance with hazardous waste regulations. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44, 290308.Google Scholar
Stafford, Sarah L. 2003. Assessing the effectiveness of state regulation and enforcement of hazardous waste. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 23, 2741.Google Scholar
Stafford, Sarah L. 2006. Rational or confused polluters? Evidence from hazardous waste compliance. Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, 5(1), Article 21.Google Scholar
Stafford, Sarah L. 2007. Can consumers enforce environmental regulations? The role of the market in hazardous waste compliance. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 31, 83107.Google Scholar
Stafford, Sarah L. 2008. Self-policing in a targeted enforcement regime. Southern Economic Journal, 74, 934–51.Google Scholar
Stafford, Sarah L. 2012. Do “carrots” work? Examining the effectiveness of EPA’s Compliance Assistance Program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31(3), 533–55.Google Scholar
Stafford, Sarah L. 2013. How predictable are environmental compliance inspections? Journal of Regulatory Economics, 44(3), 361–88.Google Scholar
Steinway, Daniel M. 2009. Fundamentals of environmental law. In Sullivan, Thomas F. P., ed., Environmental Law Handbook. Lanham, MD: Government Institutes.Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2014. Clean Water Act National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Compliance Monitoring Strategy. www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2013-09/documents/npdescms.pdf.Google Scholar
US EPA. 2015. Compliance Monitoring Strategy for the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Subtitle C Program. www.epa.gov/compliance/compliance-monitoring-strategy-resource-conservation-and-recovery-act.Google Scholar
US EPA. 2016. Clean Air Act Stationary Source Compliance Monitoring Strategy. www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2013-09/documents/cmspolicy.pdf.Google Scholar

References

Baldwin, Robert. 1995. Rules and Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bardach, Eugene and Kagan, Robert A.. 1982. Going by the Book. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary. 1968. Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169217.Google Scholar
Black, Jack. 2002. Critical reflections on regulation. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 27, 135.Google Scholar
Blanc, Florentin. 2012. Moving away from total control in communist countries – the risk regulation reflex in inspections and lessons learned from reforming them. European Journal of Risk and Regulation, 3(3), 327–41.Google Scholar
Blanc, Florentin. 2017. Inspections, risks and circumstances. Historical development, diversity of structures and practices in food safety. Studi Parlamentari e di Politica Costituzionale, 197–198, 4788.Google Scholar
Blanc, Florentin. 2018a. From Chasing Violations to Managing Risks – Origins, Challenges and Evolutions in Regulatory Inspections. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Blanc, Florentin. 2018b. Tools for effective regulation: Is more always better? European Journal of Risk Regulation, 9(3), 465–82.Google Scholar
Blanc, Florentin. 2019. The impact of inspections, measuring outcomes from occupational safety and health inspections. In Russell, Graham and Hodges, Christopher, eds., Regulatory Delivery. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Blanc, Florentin and Faure, Michael. 2018. Smart enforcement. Theory and practice. European Journal of Law Reform, 20(4), 78103.Google Scholar
Blanc, Florentin and Ottimofiore, Giuseppa. 2017. The interplay of mandates and accountability in enforcement within the EU. In Scholten, Miroslava and Luchtman, Michiel, eds., Law Enforcement by EU Authorities. Political and Judicial Accountability in Shared Enforcement. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 2008. Regulatory Capitalism. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Coglianese, Cary and Kagan, Robert A.. 2007. Regulation and regulatory processes. In Coglianese, Cary and Kagan, Robert A., eds., Regulation and Regulatory Processes. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, pp. xixxxviGoogle Scholar
Corini, Antonia, van der Meulen, Bernd, Kets, Floris, Ottimofiore, Giuseppa, and Blanc, Florentin. 2017. Enforcement of EU food law. In Scholten, Miroslava and Luchtman, Michiel, eds., Law Enforcement by EU Authorities: Implications for Political and Judicial Accountability. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 195200.Google Scholar
De Benedetto, Maria and Rangone, Nicoletta. 2019. L’effectivité des règles et des décisions administratives. In Auby, Jean-Bernard with the collaboration of E. Chevalier, Émilie and Slautsky, Emmanuel, eds., Le futur du droit administratif. Paris: LexisNexis, pp. 235–52.Google Scholar
Diver, Colin. 1983. The optimal precision of administrative rules. The Yale Law Journal, 93(1), 65.Google Scholar
Dugeree, Jigjidmaa, Cola, Giuliana, Blanc, Florentin, and Ottimofiore, Giuseppa. 2019. Lessons from creating a consolidated inspection agency in Mongolia. In Russell, Graham and Hodges, Christopher, eds., Regulatory Delivery. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Petterson, Stephen, Chamblis, Elizabeth, and Erlanger, Howard S.. 1991. Legal ambiguity and the politics of compliance: Affirmative action officers’ dilemma. Law and Politics, 13(1) 7397Google Scholar
EFSA. 2018. The European Union One Health 2018 Zoonoses Report by European Food Safety Authority. www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/5926.Google Scholar
Freiberg, Arie. 2010. The Tools of Regulation. Sydney: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
Gemmell, Campbell J. 2010. Politics and better environmental regulation, Conference Paper to the Annual Regulatory Affairs International Symposium, Institute for Parliamentary Affairs and Commonwealth Association, London. http://regulationforum.org/docs/14-07-2010/08%20Campbell%20Gemmell.pdf.Google Scholar
Gemmell, Campbell J. 2019. Environmental Governance: Effective Approaches for Scotland Post-Brexit, Scottish Environment. www.scotlink.org/publication/environmental-governance-effective-approaches-for-scotland-post-brexit/.Google Scholar
Gemmell, Campbell J. and Scott, E. Marian. 2013. Environmental regulation, sustainability and risk. Journals Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Bingley, 4(2), 120–44.Google Scholar
Gunningham, Neil, Kagan, Robert A., and Thornton, Dorothy. 2003. Shades of Green: Business, Regulation and Environment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Keith. 2002. Law as Last Resort – Prosecution Decision-Making in a Regulatory Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hodges, Christopher. 2015a. Corporate Behaviour: Enforcement, Support or Ethical Culture?. Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 19/2015. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2599961 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2599961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, Christopher. 2015b. Law and Corporate Behaviour. Oxford: Hart/Beck.Google Scholar
Huovinen, Pirjo, Ramírez, Jaime, Caputo, Luciano, and Gómez, Iván. 2019. Mapping of spatial and temporal variation of water characteristics through satellite remote sensing in Lake Panguipulli, Chile. Environment, 679, 20 August, 196208.Google Scholar
International Finance Corporation. 2016. Food Safety Toolkit. Washington, DC: International Finance Corporation. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/30897.Google Scholar
Kauffmann, Céline. and Saffirio, Camila. 2020. Study of International Regulatory Co-operation (IRC) arrangements for air quality: The cases of the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, the Canada-United States Air Quality Agreement, and co-operation in North East Asia, OECD Regulatory Policy Working Paper no. 12, Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Macrae, Donald. 2021. Food safety compliance. In van Rooij, Benjamin and Sokol, D. Daniel, eds., Cambridge Handbook of Compliance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Macrory, Richard B. 2008. Regulation, Enforcement and Governance in Environmental Law. London: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Martínez-Alier, Joan. 1995. The environment as a luxury good or “too poor to be green”? Ecological Economics, 13(1), 110.Google Scholar
Mazur, Eugene. 2010. Outcome performance measures of environmental compliance assurance: Current practices, constraints and ways forward. Environment Working Paper no. 18. www.oecd.org/env/workingpapers.Google Scholar
Mazur, Eugene. 2014. Working Party on Integrating Environmental and Economic Policies. ENV/EPOC/WPIEEP(2014)13/FINAL. www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=ENV/EPOC/WPIEEP(2014)13/FINAL&docLanguage=En.Google Scholar
McBarnet, Doreen. 2001. When compliance is not the solution but the problem: From changes in law to changes in attitude, Working Paper no. 18, Centre for Tax System Integrity (ANU).Google Scholar
OECD. 2005. SME and Entrepreneurship Outlook 2005. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD. 2010. Risk and Regulatory Policy – Improving the Governance of Risk. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD. 2014. Regulatory enforcement and inspections. In OECD Best Practice Principles for Regulatory Policy. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD. 2018a. Measuring Regulatory Performance. Paris: OECDGoogle Scholar
OECD. 2018b. OECD Regulatory Enforcement and Inspections Toolkit. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Onoda, Masami and Young, R. Oran, eds. 2018. Satellite Earth Observations and Their Impact on Society and Policy. Berlin: SpringerOpen.Google Scholar
Parker, Christine and Nielsen, Vibeke Lehmann. 2009. The challenge of empirical research on business compliance in regulatory capitalism. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 2009, 5, 4570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radaelli, Claudio M. 2016. Handbook of Regulatory Impact Assessment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Reichman, Nancy. 1992. Moving backstage: Uncovering the role of compliance in shaping regulatory policy. In Schlegel, Kip and Weisburd, David, eds., White Collar Crime Reconsidered. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press, pp. 244–68.Google Scholar
Roy, Rana and Braathen., Nils 2017. The Rising Cost of Ambient Air Pollution thus far in the 21st Century: Results from the BRIICS and the OECD Countries, OECD Environment Working Paper no. 124, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
Scott, Colin. 2001. Analysing regulatory space: Fragmented resources and institutional design. Public Law (Summer), 329–53.Google Scholar
Scott, E. Marian, Cocchi, Daniela, and Gemmell, Campbell J.. 2014. Defining a fit for purpose statistically reliable sustainability indicator. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 5(3), 262–7.Google Scholar
Scottish Food Standards. 2018. Annual Report and Accounts 2018–2019. www.foodstandards.gov.scot/downloads/FSS_Annual_Report_and_Accounts_2018-19.pdf.Google Scholar
Sparrow, Malcolm K. 2000. The Regulatory Craft: Controlling Risks, Solving Problems & Managing Compliance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Sparrow, Malcolm K. 2008. The Character of Harms: Operational Challenges in Control. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tilindyte, Laura. 2012. Enforcing Health and Safety Regulation. A Comparative Economic Approach. Antwerp: Intersentia.Google Scholar
Trevathan, Jarrod and Johnstone, Ron. 2018. Smart environmental monitoring and assessment technologies – A new paradigm for low-cost, remote aquatic environmental monitoring. Sensors (Basel), 18(7), 2248.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom. 2004. Enhancing police legitimacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 8499.Google Scholar
US EPA. 2006. Expanding the Use of Outcome Measurement for EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, Report to OMB, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC.Google Scholar
van Rooij, Benjamin. 2021. Do people know the law? Empirical evidence about legal knowledge and its implications for compliance. In van Rooij, Benjamin and Sokol, D. Daniel, eds., Cambridge Handbook of Compliance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vannan, Carolyn and Gemmell, Campbell J.. 2012. The role of regulators in reducing regulatory risk: Using scenario planning to assess the regulatory framework for carbon capture and storage. Risk Management, 14(1), 2741.Google Scholar
Voermans, Wim J. M. 2016. Legislation and regulation. In Karpen, Ulrich and Xanthaki, Helen, eds., Handbook of Legislation. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Wiener, Renda Soylemez, Schwartz, Lisa M., Woloshin, Steven, and Welch, H. Gilbert. 2011. Population-based risk for complications after transthoracic needle lung biopsy of a pulmonary nodule: An analysis of discharge records. Ann. Intern. Med., 155(3), 137–44.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×