Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-b2xwp Total loading time: 0.539 Render date: 2022-10-04T11:04:09.138Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": true, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

9 - Should Marriage Matter?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2012

Marsha Garrison
Brooklyn Law School
Elizabeth S. Scott
Columbia University Law School
Get access



Since 1970, Americans’ median age at first marriage has increased by about five years for both men (23.2 to 28.2) and women (20.8 to 26.1) (U.S. Bureau of the Census 2010). The necessary consequence is a decline in the proportion of men and women who marry by any benchmark age. Whereas 94 percent of women born between 1940 and 1944 had married by age forty, only 86 percent of those born between 1960 and 1964 had (Ellwood & Jenks 2004). The question is whether this decline is an artifact of the increasing age at first marriage or a true decline in the proportion of the population that will ever marry. Researchers are divided on this puzzle (Blau, Ferber, & Winkler 1998:274; Oppenheimer 1994). The current consensus seems to be that the educated continue to marry at the same rate but later in life, while the less educated have experienced a true decline in the proportion who ever marry (Cherlin 2010:404; Goldstein & Kenney 2001).

There have been larger marriage-rate declines in some European countries where an increasing proportion of couples live in long-term, marriage-like relationships without formal marriage. But in the United States, cohabiting relationships remain largely short-term, usually ending with separation or marriage. Yet longer-term cohabiting relationships are perhaps becoming more common here also, even among couples with children. In any event, the possibility invites our consideration of how Americans believe the law should deal with such relationships. The potential legal questions divide between those that involve the couple's treatment by third parties, such as employers and government agencies, and those that involve the couple's rights with respect to one another (their rights inter se). Both categories are obviously important. This chapter focuses on the second.

Marriage at the Crossroads
Law, Policy, and the Brave New World of Twenty-First-Century Families
, pp. 170 - 198
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Baker, L.Emery, R. 1993 When Every Relationship Is Above Average: Perceptions and Expectations of Divorce at the Time of MarriageLaw and Human Behavior, 17 439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, A.Burgoyne, C.Clery, E.Smithson, J. 2008 Cohabitation and the Law: Myths, Money and the MediaPark, A.British Social Attitudes: The 24th ReportLondonSage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Barlow, A.Duncan, S.James, G.Park, A. 2005 Cohabitation, Marriage and the Law: Social Change and Legal Reform in the 21st CenturyOxfordHartGoogle Scholar
Blau, F.Ferber, M.Winkler, A. 1998 The Economics of Women, Men and WorkUpper Saddle River, NJPrentice HallGoogle Scholar
Bowman, C.G. 1996 A Feminist Proposal to Bring Back Common Law MarriageOregon Law Review, 75Google Scholar
Bowman, C.G. 2010 Unmarried Couples, Law, and Public PolicyNew YorkOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Bramlett, M.D.Mosher, W.D. 2002
Braver, S.Ellman, I.M.Votruba, A.Fabricius, W. 2011 Lay Judgments about Child Custody after DivorcePsychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17 212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherlin, A.J 2010 Demographic Trends in the United States: A Review of Research in the 2000sJournal of Marriage and Family, 72 403CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dukeminier, J.Krier, J.E. 1998 PropertyNew YorkAspen PublishersGoogle Scholar
Edin, K.Kefalas, M. 2005 Promises I Can Keep: Why Poor Women Put Motherhood Before MarriageBerkeleyUniversity of California PressGoogle Scholar
Ellman, I.M. 2001 “Contract Thinking” Was 's Fatal FlawNotre Dame Law Review, 76 1365Google Scholar
Ellman, I.M 2002 Thinking about Custody and Support in Ambiguous-Father FamiliesFamily Law Quarterly, 36Google Scholar
Ellman, I.M.Braver, S. 2011 Lay Intuitions About Family Obligations: The Relationship Between Alimony and Child SupportChildren and Family Law Quarterly, 23 465Google Scholar
Ellman, I.M.Braver, S. 2012 Lay Intuitions about Family Obligations: The Case of AlimonyTheoretical Inquiries in Law, 13 209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellman, I.M.Braver, S.MacCoun, R.J. 2009 Intuitive Lawmaking: The Example of Child SupportJournal of Empirical Legal Studies, 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellman, I.M.Braver, S.MacCoun, R.J. 2012 Abstract Principles and Concrete Cases in Intuitive LawmakingLaw and Human Behavior 36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellman, I.M. 2010 Family Law: Cases, Text, ProblemsSan FranciscoLexis-NexisGoogle Scholar
Ellwood, D.Jenks, C. 2004 The Spread of Single Parent Families in the United States Since 1960Moynihan, D.Smeedling, T.Rainwater, L.The Future of the Family25New YorkRussell Sage FoundationGoogle Scholar
Estin, A. 2001 Unmarried Partners and the Legacy of : Ordinary CohabitationNotre Dame Law Review, 76 1381Google Scholar
Garrison, M. 2000 Law Making for Baby Making: An Interpretive Approach to the Determination of Legal ParentageHarvard Law Review, 113 835CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrison, M. 2008 Social Revolution and Legal RegulationFamily Law Quarterly, 42Google Scholar
Gilbert, Daniel 2007 Stumbling on HappinessNew YorkVintage Books/Random HouseGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, J.R.Kenney, C.T. 2001 Marriage Delayed or Marriage Forgone? New Cohort Forecasts of First Marriage for U.S. WomenAmerican Sociological Review, 66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, P.YMosher, W.D.Chandra, A. 2010 Marriage and Cohabitation in the United States: A Statistical Portrait Based on Cycle 6 (2002) of the National Survey of Family GrowthNational Center for Health Statistics ScholarPubMed
Heuveline, P.Timberlake, J.M. 2004 The Role of Cohabitation in Family Formation: The United States in Comparative PerspectiveJournal of Marriage and Family, 66 1214CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Himmelfarb, S. 1975 What Do You Do When the Control Group Doesn't Fit into the Factorial Design?Psychological Bulletin, 82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, P.T. 1999 Norms, Learning, and Law: Exploring the Influences on Workers’ Legal KnowledgeUniversity of Illinois Law Review, 1999 447Google Scholar
Manning, W.D.Smock, P.J. 2005 Measuring and Modeling Cohabitation: New Perspectives from Qualitative DataJournal of Marriage and Family, 67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheimer, V. 1994 Women's Rising Employment and the Future of the Family in Industrial SocietiesPopulation and Development Review, 20 293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pleasence, P.Balmer, N. 2011
U.S. Bureau of the Census 2010
Wasoff, F.Martin, C. 2005 Scottish Social Attitudes Survey 2004 Family Module ReportEdinburghScottish ExecutiveGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats