Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T01:00:42.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 4 - Direct Laryngoscopy Equipment and Techniques

from Section 2 - Devices and Techniques to Manage the Abnormal Airway

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2019

Narasimhan Jagannathan
Affiliation:
Northwestern University Medical School, Illinois
John E. Fiadjoe
Affiliation:
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

The technique of laryngoscopy is essential in the daily delivery of many anesthetics. Direct and indirect methods of laryngoscopy are quite commonly utilized. This chapter will address considerations as they relate to direct laryngoscopy.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Doherty, J, Froom, S, Gildersleve, C. Pediatric Laryngoscopes and Intubation Aids Old and New. Pediatric Anesthesia 2009; 19: 30–7.Google Scholar
Hirsch, N, Smith, G, Hirsch, P, et al. Pioneer of Direct Laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 1986; 41: 42–5.Google Scholar
Sykes, K. Entering the 20th Century. In Sykes, K. ed. Anesthesia and the Practice of Medicine. London: Royal Society of Medicine; 2007: 3351.Google Scholar
Miller, R. A New Laryngoscope. Anesthesiology 1941; 2: 317–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macintosh, R. A New Laryngoscope. The Lancet 1943; 1: 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertshaw, F. A New Laryngoscope for Infants and Children. The Lancet 1962; 2: 1034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levitan, RM, Hagberg, CA. Upper Airway Retraction: New and Old Laryngoscope Blades. In Hagberg, C, ed. Benumof and Hagberg’s Airway Management. Philadelphia: Saunders, Elsevier; 2013: 508–35.Google Scholar
Litman, R, Fiadjoe, J, Stricker, P, et al. The Pediatric Airway. In Coté, C, Lerman, J, Anderson, B, eds. A Practice of Anesthesia for Infants and Children. Philadelphia: Saunders, Elsevier; 2013: 237–76.Google Scholar
Scott, J, Baker, P. How did the Macintosh Laryngoscope Become So Popular? Pediatric Anesthesia 2009; 19(Suppl. 1): 24–9.Google Scholar
Watanabe, S, Suga, A, Asakura, N, et al. Determination of the Distance between the Laryngoscope Blade and the Upper Incisors during Direct Laryngoscopy: Comparisons of a Curved, an Angulated Straight, and Two Straight Blades. Anesthesia & Analgesia 1994; 79: 638–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kulkami, AP, Tirmanwar, AS. Comparison of Glottis Visualization and Ease of Intubation with Different Laryngoscope Blades. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia 2013; 57: 170–4.Google Scholar
Goodwin, N, Wilkes, A, Hall, J. Flexibility and Light Emission of Disposable Paediatric Miller 1 Laryngoscope Blades. Anaesthesia 2006; 61: 792–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sudhir, G, Wilkes, A, Clyburn, P, et al. User Satisfaction and Forces Generated during Laryngoscopy Using Disposable Miller Blades: a Manikin Study. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 1056–60.Google Scholar
Bonda, DJ, Manjila, S, Khan, F, et al. Human Prion Diseases: Surgical Lessons Learned from Iatrogenic Prion Transmission. Neurosurgical Focus 2016; 41: E10.Google Scholar
Estebe, JP. Anesthesia and Non-Conventional Transmissible Agents (or Prion Diseases). Annales Françaises d’Anesthésie et de Réanimation 1997; 16: 955–63.Google Scholar
Ledbetter, JL, Rasch, DK, Pollard, TG, et al. Reducing the Risk of Laryngoscopy in Anesthetized Infants. Anaesthesia 1988; 43: 151–3.Google Scholar
Tartell, P, Hoover, L, Friduss, M, et al. Pharyngeoesophageal Intubation Injuries: Three Case Reports. American Journal of Otolaryngology 1990; 11: 256–60.Google Scholar
Johnson, K, Hood, D. Esophageal Perforation Associated with Endotracheal Intubation. Anesthesiology 1986; 64: 281–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Qasmi, A, Al-Alawi, W, Malik, AM, et al. Comparison of Trachel Intubation Using the Storz’s C-MAC D-blade™ Videolaryngoscope Aided by Truflex™ Articulating Stylet and the Portex™ Intubating Stylet. Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 2015; 5: e32299.Google Scholar
Frova, G. Comparison of Tracheal Introducers. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 516–17; author reply, 517–18.Google Scholar
Viswanathan, S, Campbell, C, Wood, DG, et al. The Eschmann Tracheal Tube Introducer (Gum Elastic Bougie). Anesthesiology Review 1992; 19: 2934.Google Scholar
McLean, S, Lnam, CR, Benedict, W, et al. Airway Exchange Failure and Complications with the Use of the Cook Airway Exchange Catheter: a Single Center Cohort Study of 1177 Patients. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2013; 117: 1325–7.Google Scholar
Macintosh, R, Richards, H. Illuminated Introducer for Endotracheal Tubes. Anaesthesia 1957; 12: 223–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, L, Cook-Sather, SD, Schreiner, MS. Lighted Stylet Tracheal Intubation: a Review. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2000; 90: 745–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, CF, Vadivelu, N. Does the Use of a Laryngoscope Facilitate Orotracheal Intubation with a Shikani Optical Stylet? British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007; 99: 302–3.Google Scholar
Shurky, M, Hanson, R, Koveleskie, J, et al. Management of the Difficult Pediatric Airway with Shikani Optical Stylet. Pediatric Anesthesia 2005; 15: 342–5.Google Scholar
Turkstra, TP, Pelz, DM, Shaikh, AA, et al. Cervical Spine Motion: a Fluoroscopic Comparison of Shikani Optical Stylet vs Macintosh Laryngoscope. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d’anesthésie 2007; 54: 441–7.Google Scholar
Westhorpe, R. The Position of the Larynx in Children and its Relationship to the Ease of Intubation. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 1987; 15: 384–8.Google Scholar
Isono, S. Common Practice and Concepts in Anesthesia: Time for Reassessment: Is the Sniffing Position a “Gold Standard” for Laryngoscopy? Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 825–7.Google Scholar
El-Orbany, M, Woehlck, H, Salem, M. Head and Neck Position for Direct Laryngoscopy. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2011; 113: 103–9.Google Scholar
Jackson, C. The Technique of Insertion of Intratracheal Insufflation Tubes. Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics 1913; 17: 507–9.Google Scholar
Magill, I. Endotracheal Anesthesia. American Journal of Surgery 1936; 34: 450–5.Google Scholar
Bannister, F, Macbeth, R. Direct Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation. The Lancet 1944; 2: 651–4.Google Scholar
Horton, W, Fahy, L, Charters, P. Defining a Standard Intubating Position Using “Angle Finder.” British Journal of Anaesthesia 1989; 62: 612.Google Scholar
Adnet, F, Baillard, C, Borron, S, et al. Randomized Study Comparing the “Sniffing Position” with Simple Head Extension for Laryngoscopic View in Elective Surgery Patients. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 836–41.Google Scholar
Adnet, F, Borron, S, Lapostolle, F, et al. The Three Axis Alignment Theory and the “Sniffing Position”: Perpetuation of an Anatomic Myth? Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 1964–5.Google Scholar
Adnet, F, Borron, S, Dumas, J, et al. Study of the “Sniffing Position” by Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Anesthesiology 2001; 94: 83–6.Google Scholar
Adnet, F. A Reconsideration of Three Axes Alignment Theory and Sniffing Position. Anesthesiology 2002; 97: 754.Google Scholar
Vialet, R, Nau, A, Chaumoître, K, et al. Effects of Head Posture on the Oral, Pharyngeal and Laryngeal Axis Alignment in Infants and Young Children by Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Pediatric Anesthesia 2008; 18: 525–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khosla, A, Cattano, D. Airway Assessment. In Hagberg, C, Artime, C, Daily, W., eds. The Difficult Airway: a Practical Guide. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013: 18.Google Scholar
Wilson, M, Spiegelhalter, D, Robertson, J, et al. Predicting Difficult Intubation. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1988; 61: 211–16.Google Scholar
Takahata, O, Kubota, M, Mamiya, K, et al. The Efficacy of the “BURP” Maneuver during a Difficult Laryngoscopy. Anesthesia & Analgesia 1997; 84: 419–21.Google Scholar
Knill, R. Difficult Laryngoscopy Made Easy with a “BURP.” Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d’anesthésie 1993; 40: 279–82.Google Scholar
Achen, B, Terblanche, O, Finucane, B. View of the Larynx Obtained Using the Miller Blade and Paraglossal Approach, Compared to that with the Macintosh Blade. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care 2008; 36: 717–21.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. The Use of Paraglossal Straight Blade Laryngoscopy in Difficult Tracheal Intubation. Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 552–60.Google Scholar
Saxena, K, Nischal, H, Bhardwaj, M, et al. Right Molar Approach to Tracheal Intubation in a Child with Pierre Robin Syndrome, Cleft Palate, and Tongue Tie. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008; 100: 141–2.Google Scholar
Agrawal, S, Asthana, V, Meher, R, et al. Paraglossal Straight Blade Intubation Technique – an Old Technique Revisited in Difficult Intubations: a Series of 5 Cases. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia 2008; 52: 317–20.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, K, Tsubokawa, T, Ohmura, S, et al. Left-Molar Approach Improves the Laryngeal View in Patients with Difficult Laryngoscopy. Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 70.Google Scholar
Bonfils, P. Difficult Intubation in Pierre-Robin Children, a New Method: the Retromolar Route. Anaesthetist 1983; 32: 363–7.Google Scholar
Holzapfel, L, Chevret, S, Madinier, G, et al. Influence of Long-Term Oro- or Nasotracheal Intubation on Nosocomial Maxillary Sinusitis and Pneumonia: Results of a Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Trial. Critical Care Medicine 1993; 21: 1132–8.Google Scholar
Cavusoglu, T, Yazici, I, Demirtas, Y, et al. A Rare Complication of Nasotracheal Intubation: Accidental Middle Turbinectomy. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 2009; 20: 566–8.Google Scholar
Marlow, T, Goltra, D, Schabel, S. Intracranial Placement of a Nasotracheal Tube after Facial Fracture: a Rare Complication. Journal of Emergency Medicine 1997; 15: 187–91.Google Scholar
Kwon, M, Song, J, Kim, S, et al. Inspection of the Nasopharynx Prior to Fiberoptic-Guided Nasotracheal Intubation Reduces the Risk of Epistaxis. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2016; 32: 711.Google Scholar
Arisaka, H, Sakuraba, S, Furuya, M, et al. Application of Gum Elastic Bougie to Nasal Intubation. Anesthesia Progress 2010; 57: 112–13.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×