Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T20:22:25.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5.1 - Fiscal policy reforms: an alternative view

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Bjørn Lomborg
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business School
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Miguel Braun's chapter 5 provides a strong case for his thesis that the principal fiscal challenge facing the LAC region is to build on recent gains in achieving fiscal solvency and reduce the procyclical tendency of fiscal policy. He rightly notes the negative consequences of fiscal insolvency and procyclicality on growth, poverty, and income distribution. He argues that there is no scope for complacency, as recent improvement in the region's fiscal position results, at least in part, from unusually favorable external conditions that have contributed to transitory increases in revenues and reduced borrowing costs. At the same time, he notes that public expenditure is rising during the economic expansion, in line with the region's legacy of procyclical fiscal policy.

Based on a broad review of the literature, the chapter argues that insolvency and procyclicality are the result of external shocks, high levels of foreign currency-denominated debt, and politico-institutional factors. It proposes four specific solutions to meet the challenge: issuance of contingent debt instruments, adopting fiscal rules, replacing corporate taxes with personal income taxes, and establishing a policy evaluation agency. It estimates the benefits of these solutions at up to 3 percentage points of GDP per year.

Type
Chapter
Information
Latin American Development Priorities
Costs and Benefits
, pp. 274 - 292
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldunate, Eduardo, 2007. “Sistemas de Gestíon de Inversión Pública en América Latina.” Paper presented at the 19th Annual Regional Seminar on Fiscal Policy, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Santiago
Alesina, A. and Drazen, A., 1991. “Why are Stabilizations Delayed?American Economic Review 131: 1170–88Google Scholar
Alesina, A. and Perotti, R., 1994. “The Political Economy of Budget Deficits.” NBER Working Paper 4637
Alesina, A. and Tabellini, G., 1996. “Budget Institutions and Fiscal Performance in Latin America.” NBER Working Paper 5586
Alier, Max, 2008. “Measuring Budget Rigidities in Latin America.” IMF Working Paper, forthcoming
Apergis, Nicholas, Filippidis, Ioannis, and Economidou, Claire, 2007. “Financial Deepening and Economic Growth Linkages: A Panel Data Analysis.” Review of World Economics 143(1): 179–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, Robert, 1991. “Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(2): 407–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, Robert and Sala-i-Martin, Xavier, 1995. Economic Growth. Boston: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J.M., 1978. “Tax Instruments as Constraints on the Disposition of Public Revenues.” Journal of Public Economies 9(3): 301–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, C. and Keen, M., 2000. “Political Uncertainty and the Earmarking of Environmental Taxes.” Journal of Public Economics 75: 315–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J.M., 1963. “The Economics of Earmarked Taxes.” Journal of Political Economy 71(5): 457–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J.M. and Wagner, R.E., 1977. Democracy in Deficit: The Political Legacy of Lord Keynes. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Clements, Benedict, Faircloth, Christopher, and Verhoeven, Marijn, 2007a. “Getting Spending Right.” Finance and Development, June: 50–2Google Scholar
Clements, Benedict, Faircloth, Christopher, and Verhoeven, Marijn 2007b. “Public Expenditure in Latin America: Trends and Key Issues.” CEPAL Review 93: 37–60Google Scholar
Cubero, Rodrigo and Vladkova-Hollar, Ivanna, 2007. “Equity and Fiscal Policy in Central America: Income Distribution Effects of Taxation and Government Spending.” IMF
Davis, M.L. and Hayes, K., 1995. “The Demand for Good Government.” Review of Economics and Statistics 75: 148–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferranti, David, Perry, Guillermo, Gill, Indermit, Guasch, José Luis, Maloney, William, Sanchez-Paramo, Carolina, and Schady, Norbert, 2003. Closing the Gap in Education and Technology. Washington, DC: World BankCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhillon, A. and Perroni, C., 2001. “Tax Earmarking and Grassroots Accountability.” Economic Letters 72: 99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterly, William and Rebelo, Sergio, 1993. “Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth. An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Monetary Economics 39(1): 417–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Echebarría, Koldo and Cortázar, Juan, 2006. “Public Administration and Public Employment Reform in Latin America.” In Lora, Eduardo, ed., The State of State Reform in Latin America. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development BankGoogle Scholar
Echeverry, J.C., Fergusson, L., and Querubín, P., 2005. “Budget Inflexibility.” Documento CEDE 2005–52, Universidad de los Andes, Bogota
,Economic Commission on Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), 2006. Social Panorama of the Americas. Santiago: United NationsGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Sebastian, 2007. “Crises and Growth: A Latin American Perspective.” NBER Working Paper 13019
Gomez Sabaini, Juan, 2006. “Evolución y Situación Tributaria em América Latina: Una Serie de Temas para la Discusión.” In Cetrángolo, Oscar and Sabaini, Juan Gomez, Tributación em América Latina: En Busca de una Nueva Agenda de Reformas. Santiago: United NationsGoogle Scholar
,International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2005. Public Investment and Fiscal Policy – Lessons from the Pilot Country Studies. Washington, DC: International Monetary FundGoogle Scholar
,International Monetary Fund (IMF) 2007. Regional Economic Outlook: Western Hemisphere. Washington, DC: International Monetary FundGoogle Scholar
Veloso, A., 2000. “Debts and Deficits with Fragmented Policymaking.” Journal of Public Economics 76: 105–25Google Scholar
Wrede, M., 2000. “Shared Tax Sources and Public Expenditures.” International Tax and Public Finance 7(2): 7–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×