Age of Chivalry: Art in Plantagenet England 1200–1400. Ed. Alexander, Jonathan and Binski, Paul. London: Royal Academy of Arts, 1987.Google Scholar

Ahern, John. “Binding the Book: Hermeneutics and Manuscript Production in Paradiso 33.”Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 97 (1982): 800–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alford, John A.“The Grammatical Metaphor: A Survey of Its Use in the Middle Ages.”Speculum 57 (1982): 728–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alici, Luigi. Il linguaggio come segno e come testimonianza: una rilettura di Agostino. Rome: Edizioni Studium, 1976.Google Scholar

Allen, Don Cameron. “Some Theories of the Growth and Origin of Language in Milton's Age.”Philological Quarterly 28 (1949): 5–16.Google Scholar

Allen, Peter L.The Art of Love: Amatory Fiction from Ovid to the “Romance of the Rose.”Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, W. Sidney. “Ancient Ideas on the Origin and Development of Language.”Transactions of the Philological Society 81 (1948): 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Almond, Philip C.Adam and Eve in Seventeenth-Century Thought. Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Robert. The Art of Biblical Narrative. New York: Basic Books, 1981.Google Scholar

Alter, Robert. Genesis: Translation and Commentary. New York and London: W. W. Norton, 1996.Google Scholar

Amsler, Mark. Etymology and Grammatical Discourse in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 44. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, David. Before the “Knight's Tale”: Imitation of Classical Epic in Boccaccio's “Teseida.”Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Annotation and Its Texts. Ed. Barney, Stephen A.. Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Arbery, Glenn C.“Adam's First Word and the Failure of Language in Paradiso XXXIII.”Sign, Sentence, Discourse. 31–44.

Archéologie du signe. Ed. Brind'Amour, Lucie and Vance, Eugene. Papers in Mediaeval Studies 3. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1983.Google Scholar

Arens, Hans. Aristotle's Theory of Language and Its Tradition: Texts from 500 to 1750. Studies in the History of Linguistics 29. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arthur, Ross G.Medieval Sign Theory and “Sir Gawain and the Green Knight.”University of Toronto Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Ascoli, Albert Russell. “The Vowels of Authority (Dante's Convivio IV.vi.3–4).” Discourses of Authority in Medieval and Renaissance Literature. Ed. Brownlee, Kevin and Stephens, Walter. Hanover, NH: Dartmouth/University Press of New England, 1989. 23–46.Google Scholar

Aspegren, Kerstin. The Male Woman: A Feminine Ideal in the Early Church. Ed. Kieffer, René. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis: Uppsala Women's Studies, 1990.Google Scholar

Aston, Margaret. Lollards and Reformers: Images and Literacy in Late Medieval Religion. London: Hambledon Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Auden, W. H. “Dingley Dell & the Fleet.” The Dyer's Hand and Other Essays. New York: Random House, 1962. 407–28.Google Scholar

Auerbach, Erich. Literary Language and Its Public in Late Latin Antiquity and in the Middle Ages. Trans. Ralph Manheim. Bollingen Series No. 74. New York: Pantheon, 1965.Google Scholar

Auerbach, Erich. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Trans. Willard R. Trask. 1953; rpt. Princeton University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Auerbach, Erich. “Sacrae Scripturae sermo humilis.”Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 42 (1941): 57–67.Google Scholar

Badel, Pierre-Yves. “Raison ‘Fille de Dieu’ et le rationalisme de Jean de Meun.” Mélanges de langue et de littérature du Moyen Âge et de la Renaissance offerts à Jean Frappier. Publications romanes et françaises 112, 1:41–52. Geneva: Droz, 1970.Google Scholar

Badel, Pierre-Yves. Le Roman de la rose au XIVe Siècle: Étude de la réception de l'oeuvre. Publications romanes et françaises 153. Geneva: Droz, 1980.Google Scholar

Baer, Richard A. Jr.Philo's Use of the Categories Male and Female. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1970.Google Scholar

Bainton, Roland H.Erasmus of Christendom. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1969.Google Scholar

Bal, Mieke. Lethal Love: Feminist Literary Readings of Biblical Love Stories. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Baldwin, Ralph. The Unity of the “Canterbury Tales.” Anglistica 5. Copenhagen: Rosenkilde and Bagger, 1955.Google Scholar

Barański, Zygmunt G.“Dante's Biblical Linguistics.”Lectura Dantis 5 (1989): 105–43.Google Scholar

Barney, Stephen A.Allegories of History, Allegories of Love. Hamden, CT: Archon Books, 1979.Google Scholar

Barney, Stephen A.. “Chaucer's Lists.” The Wisdom of Poetry: Essays in Early English Literature in Honor of Morton W. Bloomfield. Ed. Benson, Larry D. and Wenzel, Siegfried. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University, 1982. 189–223.Google Scholar

Barolini, Teodolinda. Dante's Poets: Textuality and Truth in the “Comedy.”Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Barolini, Teodolinda. “Dante's Ulysses: Narrative and Transgression.” Dante: Contemporary Perspectives. Ed. Iannucci, Amilcare A.. Toronto Italian Studies: Major Italian Authors. University of Toronto Press, 1997. 113–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barolini, Teodolinda. The Undivine “Comedy”: Detheologizing Dante. Princeton University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baswell, Christopher. Virgil in Medieval England: Figuring the “Aeneid” from the Twelfth Century to Chaucer. Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature 24. Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Beer, Jeanette M. A.Early Prose in France: Contexts of Bilingualism and Authority. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University, 1992.Google Scholar

Beichner, Paul E. C S C. “Confrontation, Contempt of Court, and Chaucer's Cecilia.”Chaucer Review 8 (1974): 198–204.Google Scholar

Beichner, Paul E., C. S. C.. The Medieval Representative of Music, Jubal or Tubalcain? Ed. Gabriel, A. L. and Garvin, J. N.. Texts and Studies in the History of Medieval Education 2. Notre Dame: The Mediaeval Institute, 1954.Google Scholar

Benfell, V.Stanley, III. “Nimrod, the Ascent to Heaven and Dante's ‘Ovra Inconsummabile’.”Dante Studies 110 (1992): 77–93.Google Scholar

Bennett, J. A. W.Chaucer's “Book of Fame”: An Exposition of ‘The House of Fame.’ Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Bennett, J. A. W.. Middle English Literature. Ed. Gray, Douglas. Oxford History of English Literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Benson, C. David. Chaucer's Drama of Style: Poetic Variety and Contrast in the “Canterbury Tales.”Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Benson, Larry D.“The Alliterative Morte Arthure and Medieval Tragedy.”Tennessee Studies in Literature 11 (1966): 75–87.Google Scholar

Benson, Larry D. “Chaucer and Courtly Speech.” Genres, Themes, and Images in English Literature: From the Fourteenth to the Fifteenth Century. Ed. Boitani, Piero and Torti, Anna. The J. A. W. Bennett Memorial Lectures, Perugia, 1986. Tübingen: Gunter Narr; Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1988. 11–30.Google Scholar

Bergin, Thomas G.Boccaccio. New York: Viking Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Berry, Alice Fiola. “Rabelais: Homo Logos.”Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 3 (1973): 51–67.Google Scholar

Besserman, Lawrence. Chaucer and the Bible: A Critical Review of Research, Indexes, and Bibliography. New York & London: Garland, 1988.Google Scholar

Besserman, Lawrence. Chaucer's Biblical Poetics. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Blamires, Alcuin. The Case for Women in Medieval Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Blamires, Alcuin. “Women and Preaching in Medieval Orthodoxy, Heresy, and Saints' Lives.”Viator 26 (1995): 135–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blamires, Alcuin, ed., with Pratt, Karen and Marx, C. W.. Woman Defamed and Woman Defended: An Anthology of Medieval Texts. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Bloch, R. Howard. Etymologies and Genealogies: A Literary Anthropology of the French Middle Ages. University of Chicago Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Bloch, R. Howard. “Medieval Misogyny.”Representations 20 (1987): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloch, R. Howard. “Medieval Misogyny and the Invention of Western Romantic Love.” Modernité au Moyen Âge: Le Défi du Passé. Ed. Cazelles, Brigitte and Charles, Méla. Recherches et Rencontres: Publications de la Faculté des Lettres de Genève: Littérature, No. 1. Geneva: Droz, 1990. 289–313.Google Scholar

Bloch, R. Howard. Medieval Misogyny and the Invention of Western Romantic Love. University of Chicago Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloch, R. Howard. “Modest Maids and Modified Nouns: Obscenity in the Fabliaux.”Obscenity. 293–307.

Bloch, R. Howard. The Scandal of the Fabliaux. University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Boas, George. Essays on Primitivism and Related Ideas in the Middle Ages. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1948, rpt. 1997.Google Scholar

Boitani, Piero. Chaucer and the Imaginary World of Fame. Chaucer Studies X. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1984.Google Scholar

Boitani, Piero. “Chaucer's Labyrinth: Fourteenth-Century Literature and Language.”Chaucer Review 17 (1983): 197–220.Google Scholar

Bonnell, John K.“The Serpent with a Human Head in Art and Mystery Play.”American Journal of Archaeology 21 (1917): 255–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borchardt, Frank L.“Etymology in Tradition and in the Northern Renaissance.”Journal of the History of Ideas 29 (1968): 415–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

B⊘rresen, Kari Elisabeth. Subordination and Equivalence: The Nature and Rôle of Women in Augustine and Thomas Aquinas. Trans. Charles H. Talbot. Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1981.Google Scholar

Borst, Arno. Der Turmbau von Babel: Geschichte der Meinungen über Ursprung und Vielfalt der Sprachen und Völker. Stuttgart: Anton Hiersemann, 1957–63.

Botterill, Steven. “Dante and the Authority of Poetic Language.” Dante: Contemporary Perspectives. Ed. Iannucci, Amilcare A.. Toronto Italian Studies: Major Italian Authors. University of Toronto Press, 1997. 167–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boucher, Holly Wallace. “Nominalism: The Difference for Chaucer and Boccaccio.”Chaucer Review 20 (1986): 213–20.Google Scholar

Branca, Vittore. “The Myth of the Hero in Boccaccio.” Concepts of the Hero in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Trans. John Guthrie. Ed. Burns, Norman T. and Reagan, Christopher J.. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1975. 268–91.Google Scholar

Brewer, Derek. “Chaucer's Poetic Style.” The Cambridge Chaucer Companion. Ed. Boitani, Piero and Mann, Jill. Cambridge University Press, 1986. 227–42.Google Scholar

Brewer, Derek. “Gothic Chaucer.” Geoffrey Chaucer. Ed. Writers, Derek Brewer and Backgrounds, Their. London: G. Bell & Son, 1975. 1–32.Google Scholar

Brinkmann, Hennig. Mittelalterliche Hermeneutik. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broadie, Alexander. Introduction to Medieval Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Brody, Saul Nathaniel. “Chaucer's Rhyme Royal Tales and the Secularization of the Saint.”Chaucer Review 20 (1985): 113–31.Google Scholar

Brown, Peter. The Body and Society: Men, Women, and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity. Lectures on the History of Religions n. s. 13. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Brown, Peter. “Sexuality and Society in the Fifth Century AD: Augustine and Julian of Eclanum.” Tria Corda: Scritti in Onore di Arnaldo Momigliano. Ed. Gabba, Emilio. Como: Edizioni New Press, 1983. 49–70.Google Scholar

Brown-Grant, Rosalind. “Décadence ou progrès? Christine de Pizan, Boccace et la question de ‘l’âge d'or'.”Revue des langues romanes 92 (1988): 295–306.Google Scholar

Brownlee, Kevin. “Pygmalion, Mimesis, and the Multiple Endings of the Roman de la Rose.”Yale French Studies 95 (1999): 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brownlee, Kevin. “1342? Lyricism in the Age of Allegory.” A New History of French Literature. Ed. Hollier, Denis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989. 109–14.Google Scholar

Brownlee, Kevin. “Why the Angels Speak Italian: Dante as Vernacular Poeta in Paradiso XXV.”Poetics Today 5:3 (1984): 597–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brownlee, Kevin. “XXVI.”Lectura Dantis16–17 (1995): 388–401.Google Scholar

Brusegan, Rosanna. “Verità e finzione nel Jeu d'Adam.”Cultura Neolatina 40 (1980): 79–102.Google Scholar

Buc, Philippe. L'ambiguïté du Livre: prince, pouvoir, et peuple dans les commentaires de la Bible au Moyen Age. Théologie Historique 95. Paris: Beauchesne, 1994.Google Scholar

Burke, Kenneth. The Rhetoric of Religion: Studies in Logology. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Burlin, Robert R.Review of Lawler. Speculum 56 (1981): 630–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burrow, J. A.“‘A Maner Latyn Corrupt’.”Medium Aevum 30 (1961): 33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butor, Michel. “L'Alchimie et son langage.” Répertoire: Études et conférences 1948–1959. Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 1960. 12–19.Google Scholar

Buxton, Richard. Imaginary Greece: The Contexts of Mythology. Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Cahoon, Leslie. “Raping the Rose: Jean de Meun's Reading of Ovid's Amores.”Classical and Modern Literature 6 (1986): 261–85.Google Scholar

Calabrese, Michael A.“Meretricious Mixtures: Gold, Dung, and the Canon's Yeoman's Prologue and Tale.”Chaucer Review 27 (1993): 277–92.Google Scholar

Cambon, Glauco. Dante's Craft: Studies in Language and Style. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Camille, Michael. The Gothic Idol: Ideology and Image-Making in Medieval Art. Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Camille, Michael. Image on the Edge: The Margins of Medieval Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Carruthers, Mary J.“Italy, Ars Memorativa, and Fame's House.”Studies in the Age of Chaucer: Proceedings 2 (1987): 179–88.Google Scholar

Casagrande, Carla, and Silvana, Vecchio. I peccati della lingua: disciplina ed etica della parola nella cultura medievale. Bibliotheca biographica: Sezione storico-antropologica. Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana, 1987.Google Scholar

Casagrande, Gino. “Parole di Dante: Il ‘lungo silenzio’ di ‘Inferno,’ I, 63.”Giornale storico della letteratura italiana 174 (1997): 243–54.Google Scholar

Cassata, Letterio. “Il lungo silenzio di Virgilio (Inf. I 61–63).”Studi Danteschi 47 (1970): 15–41.Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst. Language and Myth. Trans. Susanne K. Langer. New York and London: Harper & Brothers, 1946.Google Scholar

Castaldo, Dino. “L'etica del primiloquium di Adamo nel De Vulgari Eloquentia.”Italica 59 (1982): 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cave, Terence. The Cornucopian Text: Problems of Writing in the French Renaissance. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Céard, Jean. “De Babel à la Pentecôte: La transformation du mythe de la confusion des langues au XVIe siècle.”Bibliothèque d'Humanisme et Renaissance 42 (1980): 577–94.Google Scholar

Cervigni, Dino. “Beatrice's Act of Naming.”Lectura Dantis 8 (1991): 85–99.Google Scholar

Chadwick, Henry. Boethius. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Chaucer and the Craft of Fiction. Ed. Arrathoon, Leigh A.. Rochester, MI.: Solaris Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Chaytor, H. J.From Script to Print: An Introduction to Medieval Literature. Cambridge University Press, 1945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chenu, Marie-Dominique. “Un cas de platonisme grammatical au Ⅻe siècle.”Revue des Sciences philosophiques et théologiques 51 (1967): 666–68.Google Scholar

Chenu, Marie-Dominique. “Civilisation urbaine et théologie: L'École de Saint-Victor au Ⅻe Siècle.”Annales 29 (1974): 1253–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chenu, Marie-Dominique. “Grammaire et théologie aux Ⅻe et XIIIe siècles.”Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 10 (1935–36): 5–28.Google Scholar

Chenu, Marie-Dominique. “Involucrum. Le mythe selon les théologiens médiévaux.”Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 22 (1955): 75–79.Google Scholar

Cherniss, Michael D.“Irony and Authority: The Ending of the Roman de la Rose.”Modern Language Quarterly 36 (1975): 227–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiarenza, Marguerite Mills. “The Imageless Vision and Dante's Paradiso.”Dante Studies 90 (1972): 77–91.Google Scholar

Chiarini, Cino. Di una imitazione inglese della Divina Commedia: La Casa della Fama di G. Chaucer. Bari: Laterza, 1902.Google Scholar

Chism, Christine N. “I Demed Hym Som Chanoun For To Be.” Chaucer's Pilgrims: An Historical Guide to the Pilgrims in The Canterbury Tales. Ed. Lambdin, Laura C. and Lambdin, Robert T.. Westport, CT; London: Greenwood Press, 1996. 340–56.Google Scholar

Cioffari, Vincenzo, and Mazzoni, Francesco. “The Prologue to the Commentary of Guido da Pisa.”Dante Studies 90 (1972): 125–37.Google Scholar

Clark, Elizabeth A.“‘Adam's Only Companion’: Augustine and the Early Christian Debate on Marriage.”Recherches Augustiniennes 21 (1986): 139–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Elizabeth A.. “Heresy, Asceticism, Adam, and Eve: Interpretations of Genesis 1–3 in the Later Latin Fathers.” Ascetic Piety and Women's Faith: Essays on Late Ancient Christianity. Lewiston, NY and Queenston, Ontario: Edwin Mellen Press, 1986. 353–85.Google Scholar

Clemen, Wolfgang. Chaucer's Early Poetry. 1938. Trans. C. A. M. Sym. London: Methuen, 1963.Google Scholar

Clogan, Paul M.“The Figural Style and Meaning of The Second Nun's Prologue and Tale.”Mediaevalia et Humanistica n.s. 3 (1972): 213–20.Google Scholar

Cockerell, S. C.Old Testament Miniatures. New York: Braziller, 1927, rpt. 1969.Google Scholar

Cohen, Murray. Sensible Words: Linguistic Practice in England, 1640–1785. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Coletti, Theresa. Naming the Rose: Eco, Medieval Signs, and Modern Theory. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Colish, Marcia L.The Mirror of Language: A Study in the Medieval Theory of Knowledge. Rev. ed. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Colish, Marcia L.. “St. Augustine's Rhetoric of Silence Revisited.”Augustinian Studies 9 (1978): 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colish, Marcia L.. “The Stoic Theory of Verbal Signification and the Problems of Lies and False Statements from Antiquity to St. Anselm.”Archéologie du signe. 17–43.

Contini, Gianfranco. “Dante come personnagio-poeta della ‘Commedia’.” Varianti e altra linguistica: una racolta di saggi (1938–1968). 1958; rpt. Turin: Einaudi, 1970. 335–61.Google Scholar

Cooper, Helen. “The Four Last Things in Dante and Chaucer: Ugolino in the House of Rumour.” New Medieval Literatures 3. Ed. Scase, Wendy, Copeland, Rita, and Lawton, David. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999. 39–66.Google Scholar

Cooper, Helen. Oxford Guides to Chaucer: The Canterbury Tales. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Copeland, Rita. “Rhetoric and the Politics of the Literal Sense in Medieval Literary Theory: Aquinas, Wyclif, and the Lollards.”Interpretation: Medieval and Modern. 1–23.

Copeland, Rita. Rhetoric, Hermeneutics, and Translation in the Middle Ages: Academic Traditions and Vernacular Texts. Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature 11. Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornish, Alison. “The Epistle of James in ‘Inferno’ 26.”Traditio 45 (1989–1990): 367–79.CrossRef

Corti, Maria. Dante a un nuovo crocevia. Florence: Libreria Commissionaria Sansoni, 1982.Google Scholar

Corti, Maria. “Dante e la Torre di Babele: una nuova ‘allegoria in factis’.” Il viaggio testuale: Le ideologie e le strutture semiotiche. Turin: Einaudi, 1978. 243–56.Google Scholar

Corti, Maria. “Les notions de ‘langue universelle’ et de ‘langue poétique’ chez Dante Alighieri.” Logos Semantikos: Studia Linguistica in Honorem Eugenio Coseriu 1921–1981. Ed. Geckeler, Horst et al. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1981. 1:31–39.Google Scholar

Coudert, Allison. “Some Theories of a Natural Language from the Renaissance to the Seventeenth Century.”Magia Naturalis und die Entstehung der Modernen Naturwissenschaften. Studia Leibnitiana Sonderheft 7 (1978): 56–114.Google Scholar

Courcelle, Pierre. Les Confessions de Saint Augustin dans la tradition littéraire. Paris: Etudes Augustiniennes, 1963.Google Scholar

Courcelle, Pierre. “Tradition néo-platonicienne et traditions chrétiennes de la ‘région de dissemblance’ (Platon, Politique, 273d).”Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 24 (1957): 5–33.Google Scholar

Courtenay, William J.“The Bible in the Fourteenth Century: Some Observations.”Church History 54 (1985): 176–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Courtenay, William J.. “Force of Words and Figures of Speech: The Crisis over Virtus Sermonis in the Fourteenth Century.”Franciscan Studies 44 (1984): 107–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cowgill, Bruce Kent. “Sweetness and Sweat: The Extraordinary Emanations in Fragment Eight of the Canterbury Tales.”Philological Quarterly 74 (1995): 343–57.Google Scholar

Craun, Edwin David. Lies, Slander and Obscenity in Medieval English Literature: Pastoral Rhetoric and the Deviant Speaker. Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature 31. Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cremona, Joseph. “Dante's Views on Language.” The Mind of Dante. Ed. Limentani, Uberto. Cambridge University Press, 1965. 138–62.Google Scholar

Cremona, Joseph. “Paradiso XXVI.” Cambridge Readings in Dante's Comedy. Ed. Foster, Kenelm and Boyde, Patrick. Cambridge University Press, 1981. 174–90.Google Scholar

Curtius, Ernst Robert. European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. Trans. Willard R. Trask. New York: Pantheon Books, 1953.Google Scholar

Dahan, Gilbert. “Les interprétations juives dans les commentaires du Pentateuque de Pierre le Chantre.” The Bible in the Medieval World: Essays in Memory of Beryl Smalley. Ed. Walsh, Katherine and Wood, Diana. Oxford: Blackwell, 1985. 131–55.Google Scholar

d'Alverny, Marie-Thérèse. “L'homme comme symbole. Le microcosme.”Simboli e Simbologia nell'Alto Medioevo. Settimane di studio del Centro italiano di studi sull'alto Medioevo [Spoleto] 23 (1976): 123–83.Google Scholar

Damon, Phillip. “Adam on the Primal Language: ‘Paradiso’ 26.124.”Italica 38 (1961): 60–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daniell, David. William Tyndale: A Biography. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

The Dante Encyclopedia. Ed. Lansing, Richard. New York and London: Garland, 2000.Google Scholar

Davis, Charles T.Dante's Italy and Other Essays. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Dean, James M.“Dismantling the Canterbury Book.”Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 100 (1985): 746–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dean, James M.. “The World Grown Old and Genesis in Middle English Historical Writings.”Speculum 57 (1982): 548–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dean, James M.. The World Grown Old in Later Medieval Literature. Medieval Academy Books No. 101. Cambridge, MA: The Medieval Academy of America, 1997.Google Scholar

Grazia, Margreta. “Language in Elizabethan England: The Divine Model.”Diss. Princeton University, 1975.Google Scholar

Grazia, Margreta. “Shakespeare's View of Language: An Historical Perspective.”Shakespeare Quarterly 29 (1978): 374–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demonet, Marie-Luce. Les voix du signe: nature et origine de langage à la Renaissance (1480–1580). Bibliothèque Littéraire de la Renaissance; Série 3:29. Paris and Geneva: Champion-Slatkine, 1992.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. “Des Tours de Babel.” Difference in Translation. Ed. & trans. Joseph F. Graham. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1985. 165–248.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Desmond, Marilynn. Reading Dido: Gender, Textuality, and the Medieval Aeneid. Medieval Cultures 8. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Dinshaw, Carolyn. Chaucer's Sexual Poetics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Donaldson, E. T., ed. Chaucer's Poetry: An Anthology for the Modern Reader. 1958; 2nd edn.: New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1975.Google Scholar

d'Ovidio, Francesco. “Dante e la filosofia del linguaggio.” Studii sulla Divina Commedia. Vol. 2. Caserta: Casa Editrice Moderna, 1931. 291–325.Google Scholar

Dragonetti, Roger. “La Conception du langage poétique dans le ‘De vulgari eloquentia’ de Dante.” Aux Frontières du Langage Poétique. Romanica Gandensia [Ghent] 9 (1961): 9–77.Google Scholar

Dragonetti, Roger. “Dante face à Nemrod: Babel mémoire et miroir de l'Eden?”Critique 35, Nos. 387–88 (Aout-Septembre) (1979): 690–706.Google Scholar

Dragonetti, Roger. “Une métaphore du sens propre dans le Roman de la Rose.” La Musique et les lettres: études de littérature médiévale. Publications romanes et françaises 171. Geneva: Droz, 1986. 381–97. (Rpt. from Digraphe 21 (1979): 69–85.)Google Scholar

Dragonetti, Roger. “Pygmalion ou les pièges de la fiction dans le Roman de la Rose.” Orbis Mediaevalis: Mélanges de langue et de littérature médiévales offerts à Reto Raduolf Bezzola. Ed. Güntert, Georges, Jung, Marc-René and Ringger, Kurt. Berne: Francke, 1978. 89–111.Google Scholar

Dronke, Peter. “La creazione degli animali.”L'Uomo di fronte al mondo animale nell'alto Medioevo. Settimane di studio del Centro italiano di studi sull'alto Medioevo [Spoleto] 31 (1983): 810–13.Google Scholar

Dronke, Peter. Dante and Medieval Latin Traditions. Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Dronke, Peter. Fabula: Explorations into the Uses of Myth in Medieval Platonism. Mittellateinische Studien und Texte 9. Ed. Langosch, Karl. Leiden and Cologne: E. J. Brill, 1974.Google Scholar

Dronke, Peter. The Medieval Lyric. 1968; rpt. London: Hutchinson, 1978.Google Scholar

Dronke, Peter. “Thierry of Chartres.”A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy. 358–85.

Dronke, Peter. Women Writers of the Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Dubois, Claude-Gilbert. Mythe et langage au seizième siècle. Bordeaux: Éditions Ducros, 1970.Google Scholar

Duchrow, Ulrich. Sprachverständnis und Biblisches Hören bei Augustin. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1965.Google Scholar

Eberle, Patricia J.“The Lover's Glass: Nature's Discourse on Optics and the Optical Design of the Roman de la Rose.”University of Toronto Quarterly 46 (1977): 241–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eco, Umberto. The Search for the Perfect Language. Trans. James Fentress. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto, and Lambertini, Roberto, Marmo, Costantino, and Tabarroni, Andrea. “On Animal Language in the Medieval Classification of Signs.”On the Medieval Theory of Signs. 3–41.

Edwards, Robert R.The Dream of Chaucer: Representation and Reflection in the Early Narratives. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Elsky, Martin. Authorizing Words: Speech, Writing, and Print in the English Renaissance. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Emerson, Oliver F.“Legends of Cain, Especially in Old and Middle English.”Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 21 (1906): 831–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enciclopedia Dantesca. Ed. Bosco, Umberto and Petrocchi, Giorgio. Roma: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana, 1970–78.Google Scholar

Engels, Joseph. “Origine, sens et survie du terme boécien ‘secundum placitum’.”Vivarium 1 (1963): 187–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engels, Joseph. “La portée de l'étymologie isidorienne.”Studi Medievali 3 ser., 3 (1962): 99–128.Google Scholar

Engle, Lars. “Chaucer, Bakhtin, and Griselda.”Exemplaria 1 (1989): 429–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, G. R.Augustine on Evil. Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Evans, G. R.. The Language and Logic of the Bible: The Earlier Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, G. R.. The Language and Logic of the Bible: The Road to Reformation. Cambridge University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, G. R.. Old Arts and New Theology. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Evans, G. R. “Wyclif on Literal and Metaphorical.” From Ockham to Wyclif. Ed. Hudson, Anne and Wilks, Michael. Studies in Church History: Subsidia 5. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, for the Ecclesiastical History Society, 1987. 259–66.Google Scholar

Evans, J. Martin. “Paradise Lost” and the Genesis Tradition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Faral, Edmond. Les arts poétiques du Ⅻe et du XIIIe siècles: Recherches et documents sur la technique littéraire du moyen áge. Bibliothèque de l'École des Hautes Études: Sciences historiques et philologiques 238. Paris: É. Champion, 1924.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Margaret W.“St. Augustine's Region of Unlikeness: The Crossing of Exile and Language.”Georgia Review 29 (1975): 842–64.Google Scholar

Ferrante, Joan M.The Political Vision of the “Divine Comedy.”Princeton University Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrante, Joan M.. “The Relation of Speech to Sin in the Inferno.”Dante Studies 87 (1969): 33–46.Google Scholar

Ferrante, Joan M.. Woman as Image in Medieval Literature. New York and London: Columbia University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Ferrante, Joan M. “Words and Images in the Paradiso: Reflections of the Divine.” Dante, Petrarch, Boccaccio: Studies in the Italian Trecento in Honor of Charles S. Singleton. Ed. Bernardo, Aldo S. and Pellegrini, Anthony L.. Binghamton, NY: Medieval & Renaissance Texts & Studies, 1983. 115–32.Google Scholar

Fish, Stanley Eugene. Surprised by Sin. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Fleming, John V.An Introduction to the Franciscan Literature of the Middle Ages. Chicago: Franciscan Herald Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Fleming, John V.. Reason and the Lover. Princeton University Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleming, John V.. The Roman de la Rose: A Study in Allegory and Iconography. Princeton University Press, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Floeri, Fernand. “Le sens de la ‘division des sexes’ chez Grégoire de Nysse.”Revue des Sciences Religieuses 27 (1953): 105–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flores, Nona C. “‘Effigies Amicitiae … Veritas Inimicitiae’: Antifeminism in the Iconography of the Woman-Headed Serpent in Medieval and Renaissance Art and Literature.” Animals in the Middle Ages: A Book of Essays. Ed. Flores, Nona C.. Garland Medieval Casebooks. New York and London: Garland, 1996. 167–95.Google Scholar

Forsyth, Neil. The Old Enemy: Satan and the Combat Myth. Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage Books, 1973.Google Scholar

Fowler, Alastair. Spenser and the Numbers of Time. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1964.Google Scholar

Freccero, John. Dante: The Poetics of Conversion. Ed. Jacoff, Rachel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Freccero, John. “Dante's Ulysses: From Epic to Novel.” Concepts of the Hero in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Ed. Norman, T. Burns and Christopher, J. Reagan. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1975. 101–19.Google Scholar

Freccero, John. “The Fig Tree and the Laurel: Petrarch's Poetics.”Diacritics 5:1 (1975): 34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. Beyond the Pleasure Principle. Trans. James Strachey. New York: Liveright, 1970.Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. Civilization and Its Discontents. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985. Vol. 12 of Civilization, Society, and Religion. Trans. James Strachey. Ed. Dickson, Albert. The Pelican Freud Library. 251–340.Google Scholar

Friedländer, Paul. Plato. Trans. Hans Meyerhoff. 2nd edn. Bollingen Series 59. Princeton University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Friedman, John Block. The Monstrous Races in Medieval Art and Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Friedman, Lionel J.“Jean de Meun and Ethelred of Rievaulx.”L'Esprit Créateur 2 (1962): 135–41.Google Scholar

Froula, Christine F.“When Eve Reads Milton: Undoing the Canonical Economy.”Critical Inquiry 10 (1983–84): 321–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frye, Northrop. The Secular Scripture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Furrow, Melissa. “The Author and Damnation: Chaucer, Writing, and Penitence.”Forum for Modern Language Studies 33 (1997): 245–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fyler, John M.“Auctoritee and Allusion in Troilus and Criseyde.”Res Publica Litterarum 7 (1984): 73–92.Google Scholar

Fyler, John M.. Chaucer and Ovid. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Fyler, John M. “Chaucer, Pope, and the House of Fame.” The Idea of Medieval Literature: New Essays on Chaucer and Medieval Culture in Honor of Donald R. Howard. Ed. Dean, James M. and Zacher, Christian K.. Newark: University of Delaware Press; London and Toronto: Associated University Presses, 1992. 149–59.Google Scholar

Fyler, John M.. “The Fabrications of Pandarus.”Modern Language Quarterly 41 (1980): 115–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fyler, John M. “Froissart and Chaucer.” Froissart Across the Genres. Ed. Maddox, Donald and Sturm-Maddox, Sara. Gainesville: University of Florida Press, 1998. 195–218.Google Scholar

Fyler, John M.. “Love and the Declining World: Ovid, Genesis, and Chaucer.”Mediaevalia 13 (1989 [for 1987]): 295–307.Google Scholar

Fyler, John M.“Man, Men, and Women in Chaucer's Poetry.”The Olde Daunce. 154–76.

Fyler, John M. “Nimrod, the Commentaries on Genesis, and Chaucer.” The Uses of Manuscripts in Literary Studies: Essays in Memory of Judson Boyce Allen. Ed. Morse, Charlotte Cook, Doob, Penelope Reed and Woods, Marjorie Curry. Studies in Medieval Culture 31. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, Medieval Institute Publications, 1992. 193–211.Google Scholar

Fyler, John M.. “Omnia Vincit Amor: Incongruity and the Limitations of Structure in Ovid's Elegiac Poetry.”Classical Journal 66 (1971): 196–203.Google Scholar

Fyler, John M. “St. Augustine, Genesis, and the Origin of Language.” Saint Augustine and His Influence in the Middle Ages. Ed. King, Edward B. and Schaefer, Jacqueline T.. Sewanee Mediaeval Studies 3. Sewanee, TN.: University of the South, 1988. 69–78.Google Scholar

Gallacher, Patrick J.Love, the Word, and Mercury: A Reading of John Gower's “Confessio Amantis.”Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Galloway, Andrew. “Authority.” A Companion to Chaucer. Ed. Brown, Peter. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000. 23–39.Google Scholar

Galloway, Andrew. “Chaucer's Former Age and the Fourteenth-Century Anthropology of Craft: The Social Logic of a Premodernist Lyric.”ELH 63 (1996): 535–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ganim, John M.Chaucerian Theatricality. Princeton University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gans, Eric. The Origin of Language: A Formal Theory of Representation. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Gaunt, Simon. Gender and Genre in Medieval French Literature. Cambridge Studies in French 53. Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gellrich, Jesse. The Idea of the Book in the Middle Ages: Language Theory, Mythology, and Fiction. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Genette, Gérard. Mimologics. Trans. Thaïs E. Morgan. Lincoln & London: University of Nebraska Press, 1995. Mimologiques: Voyage en Cratylie. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1976.Google Scholar

George, F. W. A. “Jean de Meung and the Myth of the Golden Age.” The Classical Tradition in French Literature: Essays Presented to R. C. Knight. Ed. Barnwell, H. T. et al. London: Grant and Cutler, 1977. 31–39.Google Scholar

Gillespie, Vincent. “Postcards from the Edge: Interpreting the Ineffable in the Middle English Mystics.”Interpretation: Medieval and Modern. 137–65.

Gilson, Étienne. “Regio Dissimilitudinis de Platon à Saint Bernard de Clairvaux.”Mediaeval Studies 9 (1947): 108–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsberg, Warren. Chaucer's Italian Tradition. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsberg, Warren. “Ovid and the Problem of Gender.”Mediaevalia 13 (1989 [for 1987]): 9–28.Google Scholar

Ginzberg, Louis. The Legends of the Jews. Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1911–67.Google Scholar

Goldstein, Harvey D.“Enea e Paolo: A Reading of the 26th Canto of Dante's Inferno.”Symposium 19 (1965): 316–27.Google Scholar

Goulburn, Edward Meyrick. The Ancient Sculptures in the Roof of Norwich Cathedral. London: The Autotype Fine Art Company, 1876.Google Scholar

Grayson, Cecil. “‘Nobilior est vulgaris’: Latin and Vernacular in Dante's Thought.” Centenary Essays on Dante. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965. 54–76.Google Scholar

Green, Richard Firth. “Changing Chaucer.”Studies in the Age of Chaucer 25 (2003): 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greene, Thomas M.The Descent from Heaven: A Study in Epic Continuity. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Greene, Thomas M. “Dramas of Selfhood in the Comedy.” From Time to Eternity: Essays on Dante's Divine Comedy. Ed. Bergin, Thomas G.. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967. 103–36.Google Scholar

Greene, Thomas M.. The Light in Troy: Imitation and Discovery in Renaissance Poetry. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Grennen, Joseph E.“The Canon's Yeoman and the Cosmic Furnace: Language and Meaning in the ‘Canon's Yeoman's Tale’.”Criticism 4 (1962): 225–40.Google Scholar

Greene, Thomas M.. “Chaucer and the Commonplaces of Alchemy.”Classica et Mediaevalia 26 (1965): 306–33.Google Scholar

Greene, Thomas M.. “Saint Cecilia's ‘Chemical Wedding’: The Unity of the Canterbury Tales, Fragment VIII.”Journal of English and Germanic Philology 65 (1966): 466–81.Google Scholar

Grudin, Michaela Paasche. Chaucer and the Politics of Discourse. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Guerri, Domenico. “Il nome adamitico di Dio.” Scritti danteschi e d'altra letteratura antica. Ed. Lanza, Antonio. Medioevo e Rinascimento, 1. 1908; rpt. Anzio: De Rubeis, 1990. 57–73.Google Scholar

Guerrieri Crocetti, Camillo. “Divagazioni sul De Vulgari Eloquentia.” Nel mondo neolatino. Bari: Adriatica Editrice, 1969. 361–77.Google Scholar

Guldan, Ernst. Eva und Maria. Graz-Cologne: Böhlau, 1966.Google Scholar

Gunn, Alan M. F.The Mirror of Love: A Reinterpretation of “The Romance of the Rose.”Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech Press, 1952.Google Scholar

Haidu, Peter. “Repetition: Modern Reflections on Medieval Aesthetics.”MLN 92 (1977): 875–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, A. C. “Our New Poet: Spenser, ‘well of English vndefyld’.” A Theatre for Spenserians. Ed. Kennedy, Judith M. and Reither, James A.. University of Toronto Press, 1973. 101–23.Google Scholar

Hanna, Ralph, III. “Compilatio and the Wife of Bath: Latin Backgrounds, Ricardian Texts.” Latin and Vernacular: Studies in Late-Medieval Texts and Manuscripts. Ed. Minnis, A. J.. York Manuscripts Conferences: Proceedings Series 1. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1989. 1–11.Google Scholar

Hanna, Ralph III. “The Difficulty of Ricardian Prose Translation: The Case of the Lollards.”Modern Language Quarterly 51 (1990): 319–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanning, Robert W.“Chaucer's First Ovid: Metamorphosis and Poetic Tradition in The Book of the Duchess and The House of Fame.”Chaucer and the Craft of Fiction. 121–63.

Hanning, Robert W.. “Roasting a Friar, Mis-Taking a Wife, and Other Acts of Textual Harassment in Chaucer's Canterbury Tales.”Studies in the Age of Chaucer 7 (1985): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanning, Robert W. “The Theme of Art and Life in Chaucer's Poetry.” Geoffrey Chaucer. Ed. Economou, George D.. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975. 15–36.Google Scholar

Hanning, Robert W.. “Uses of Names in Medieval Literature.”Names 16 (1968): 325–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, Kevin. The Trespass of the Sign: Deconstruction, Theology and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Haskins, Charles Homer. Studies in the History of Mediaeval Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1924.Google Scholar

Hawkins, Peter S.“Adam.”Dante Encyclopedia. 4–5.

Hawkins, Peter S.. Dante's Testaments: Essays in Scriptural Imagination. Stanford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Heilbronn-Gaines, Denise. “XVIII.”Lectura Dantis16–17 (1995): 266–76.Google Scholar

Herren, Michael W. “Latin and the Vernacular Language.” Medieval Latin: An Introduction and Bibliographical Guide. Ed. Mantello, F. A. C. and Rigg, A. G.. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1996. 122–29.Google Scholar

Hicks, Eric. “The ‘Querelle de la Rose’ in the Roman de la Rose.”Les Bonnes Feuilles 3 (1974): 152–69.Google Scholar

Hicks, Eric. “Sous les pavés, le sens: Le dire et le décorum allégoriques dans Le Roman de la Rose de Jean de Meun.”Etudes-de-Lettres2–3 (1987): 113–32.Google Scholar

Hilberry, Jane. “‘And in Oure Madnesse Everemoore We Rave’: Technical Language in the Canon's Yeoman's Tale.”Chaucer Review 21 (1987): 435–43.Google Scholar

Hill, Thomas D.“Narcissus, Pygmalion, and the Castration of Saturn: Two Mythographical Themes in the Roman de la Rose.”Studies in Philology71 (1974): 404–26.Google Scholar

Hindman, Sandra L.Christine de Pizan's “Epistre Othéa”: Painting and Politics at the Court of Charles VI. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1986.Google Scholar

Hirn, Yrjö. The Sacred Shrine. Boston: Beacon Press, 1912, rpt. 1957.Google Scholar

Hirsh, John C. “The Second Nun's Tale.” Chaucer's Religious Tales. Ed. Benson, C. David and Robertson, Elizabeth. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1990. 161–70.Google Scholar

A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy. Ed. Dronke, Peter. Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hollander, Robert. Allegory in Dante's “Commedia.”Princeton University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Hollander, Robert. “Babytalk in Dante's Commedia.”Mosaic 8 (1975): 73–84.Google Scholar

Hollander, Robert. Il Virgilio dantesco: Tragedia nella “Commedia.” Biblioteca di “Lettere Italiane”: Studi e Testi 28. Florence: Leo S. Olschki Editore, 1983.Google Scholar

Horowitz, Maryanne Cline. “The Image of God in Man – Is Woman Included?”Harvard Theological Review 72 (1979): 169–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Householder, Fred W. “The Primacy of Writing.” Linguistic Speculations. Cambridge University Press, 1971. 244–64.Google Scholar

Howard, Donald R.The Idea of the Canterbury Tales. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Hudson, Anne. The Premature Reformation: Wycliffite Texts and Lollard History. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Hudson, Anne. “Wyclif and the English Language.” Wyclif in His Times. Ed. Kenny, Anthony. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986. 85–103.Google Scholar

Hult, David. “Closed Quotations: The Speaking Voice in the Roman de la Rose.”Yale French Studies 67 (1984): 248–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hult, David. “Language and Dismemberment: Abelard, Origen, and the Romance of the Rose.”Rethinking the “Romance of the Rose.”101–30.

Hult, David. “Words and Deeds: Jean de Meun's Romance of the Rose and the Hermeneutics of Censorship.”New Literary History 28 (1997): 345–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huot, Sylvia. From Song to Book: The Poetics of Writing in Old French Lyric and Lyrical Narrative Poetry. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Huot, Sylvia. “The Medusa Interpolation in the Romance of the Rose: Mythographic Program and Ovidian Intertext.”Speculum 62 (1987): 865–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huot, Sylvia. “The Romance of the Rose” and Its Medieval Readers: Interpretation, Reception, Manuscript Transmission. Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature 16. Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Huppé, Bernard F.A Reading of the “Canterbury Tales.” Rev. ed. Albany: State University of New York, 1967.Google Scholar

Ineichen, Gustav. “Le discours linguistique de Jean de Meun.”Romanistische Zeitschrift für Literaturgeschichte 2 (1978): 245–53.Google Scholar

Interpretation: Medieval and Modern. Ed. Boitani, Piero and Torti, Anna. The J. A. W. Bennett Memorial Lectures, Eighth Series, Perugia, 1992. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1993.Google Scholar

Irvine, Martin. The Making of Textual Culture: ‘Grammatica’ and Literary Theory, 350–1100. Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature 19. Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Irvine, Martin. “Medieval Grammatical Theory and Chaucer's House of Fame.”Speculum 60 (1985): 850–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, B. Darrell. “The Theory of Signs in St. Augustine's De Doctrina Christiana.”Revue des Études Augustiniennes 15 (1969): 9–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacob, E. F. “The Giants (Inferno, XXⅪ).” Medieval Miscellany Presented to Eugène Vinaver. Ed. Whitehead, Frederick, Diverres, A. H., and Sutcliffe, F. E.. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1965. 167–85.Google Scholar

Jacoff, Rachel. “Intertextualities in Arcadia: Purgatorio 30.49–51.” The Poetry of Allusion: Virgil and Ovid in Dante's ‘Commedia.’ Ed. Jacoff, Rachel and Schnapp, Jeffrey T.. Stanford University Press, 1991. 131–44.Google Scholar

Jacoff, Rachel and Stephany, William. “Inferno II.” Lectura Dantis Americana. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Jager, Eric. “Did Eve Invent Writing? Script and the Fall in ‘The Adam Books’.”Studies in Philology 93 (1996): 229–50.Google Scholar

Jager, Eric. The Tempter's Voice: Language and the Fall in Medieval Literature. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

James, M. R.Illustrations of the Book of Genesis. Oxford: Roxburghe Club, 1921.Google Scholar

James, M. R.. “Pictor in Carmine.”Archaeologia 94 (1951): 141–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, Montague Rhodes, and Millar, Eric George. The Bohun Manuscripts. Oxford: Roxburghe Club, 1936.Google Scholar

Jameson, Fredric. The Prison-House of Language: A Critical Account of Structuralism and Russian Formalism. Princeton University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Jarrell, Randall. A Sad Heart at the Supermarket. New York: Atheneum, 1962.Google Scholar

Javelet, Robert. Image et ressemblance au douzième siècle, de saint Anselme à Alain de Lille. 2 vols. Paris: Letouzey & Ané, 1967.Google Scholar

Jeauneau, Édouard. “Deux rédactions des gloses de Guillaume de Conches sur Priscien.”Recherches de Théologie Ancienne et Médiévale 27 (1960): 212–47.Google Scholar

Jeauneau, Édouard. “L'usage de la notion d'integumentum à travers les gloses de Guillaume de Conches.”Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 24 (1957): 35–100.Google Scholar

Jeffrey, David Lyle, ed. A Dictionary of Biblical Tradition in English Literature. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1992.Google Scholar

Jenaro-MacLennan, Luis. The Trecento Commentaries on the “Divina Commedia” and the Epistle to Cangrande. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.Google Scholar

John Paul, Pope II. “The Dignity of Women: Pope John Paul II's Letter.”The Tablet. 1 October 1988: 1138–42.Google Scholar

Johnson, Douglas W.“Verbum in the Early Augustine (386–397).”Recherches Augustiniennes 8 (1972): 25–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jolivet, Jean. Arts du langage et théologie chez Abélard. Études de philosophie médiévale 57. Paris: J. Vrin, 1969.Google Scholar

Jolivet, Jean. “Quelques cas de ‘platonisme grammatical’ du VIIe au Ⅻe siècle.” Mélanges René Crozet. 2 vols. Poitiers: Société d'études médiévales, 1966. 1:93–99.Google Scholar

Jones, Charles W.“Some Introductory Remarks on Bede's Commentary on Genesis.”Sacris Erudiri 19 (1969–70): 115–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordan, Robert M.Chaucer and the Shape of Creation: The Aesthetic Possibilities of Inorganic Structure. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Jordan, Robert M.. Chaucer's Poetics and the Modern Reader. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Joslin, Mary Coker, and Watson, Carolyn Coker Joslin. The Egerton Genesis. London, Toronto and Buffalo: The British Library and the University of Toronto Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Jung, Marc-René. “Jean de Meun et l'Allégorie.”Cahiers de l'Association Internationale des Études Françaises 28 (1976): 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Justman, Stewart. “Medieval Monism and Abuse of Authority in Chaucer.”Chaucer Review 11 (1975): 95–111.Google Scholar

Kamesar, Adam. Jerome, Greek Scholarship, and the Hebrew Bible: A Study of the “Quaestiones Hebraicae in Genesim.”Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Kane, George. Chaucer. Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Kaske, Robert E.“Beowulf and the Book of Enoch.”Speculum 46 (1971): 421–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katz, David S. “The Language of Adam in Seventeenth-Century England.” History and Imagination: Essays in Honour of H. R. Trevor-Roper. Ed. Lloyd-Jones, Hugh, Pearl, Valerie and Warden, Blair. London: Duckworth, 1981. 132–45.Google Scholar

Kay, Richard. Dante's Swift and Strong: Essays on Inferno XV. Lawrence: Regents Press of Kansas, 1978.Google Scholar

Kay, Sarah. “The Birth of Venus in the Roman de la Rose.”Exemplaria 9 (1997): 7–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kay, Sarah. The Romance of the Rose. Critical Guides to French Texts 110. London: Grant & Cutler, 1995.Google Scholar

Kay, Sarah. “Women's Body of Knowledge: Epistemology and Misogyny in the Romance of the Rose.” Framing Medieval Bodies. Ed. Kay, Sarah and Rubin, Miri. Manchester University Press, 1994. 211–35.Google Scholar

Kelly, Douglas. Internal Difference and Meanings in the “Roman de la Rose.”Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Kelly, Henry Ansgar. “The Metamorphoses of the Eden Serpent during the Middle Ages and Renaissance.”Viator 2 (1971): 301–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, Henry Ansgar. Tragedy and Comedy from Dante to Pseudo-Dante. University of California Publications in Modern Philology 121. Berkeley, London: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Kieckhefer, Richard. Magic in the Middle Ages. Cambridge Medieval Textbooks. Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick, Robin. Dante: The Divine Comedy. Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Kirwan, Christopher. Augustine. London and New York: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar

Kiser, Lisa J.“Eschatological Poetics in Chaucer's House of Fame.”Modern Language Quarterly 49 (1988): 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiser, Lisa J.. Truth and Textuality in Chaucer's Poetry. Hanover and London: University Press of New England, 1991.Google Scholar

Klemp, P. J.“‘Now Hid, Now Seen’: An Acrostic in Paradise Lost.”Milton Quarterly 11 (1977): 91–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klinck, Roswitha. Die Lateinische Etymologie des Mittelalters. Medium Aevum 17. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1970.Google Scholar

Klingender, Francis. Animals in Art and Thought to the End of the Middle Ages. Ed. Anthal, Evelyn and Harthan, John. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Knowlson, James. Universal Language Schemes in England and France 1600–1800. University of Toronto Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Kolve, V. A.“Chaucer's Second Nun's Tale and the Iconography of Saint Cecilia.”New Perspectives in Chaucer Criticism. 137–74.

Koonce, B. G.Chaucer and the Tradition of Fame: Symbolism in “The House of Fame.”Princeton University Press, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kooper, Erik. “Loving the Unequal Equal: Medieval Theologians and Marital Affection.”The Olde Daunce. 44–56.

Kretzmann, Norman. “Aristotle on Spoken Sound Significant by Convention.” Ancient Logic and Its Modern Interpretations. Ed. Corcoran, John. Synthese Historical Library: Texts and Studies in the History of Logic and Philosophy 9. Dordrecht-Holland and Boston-USA: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1974. 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kretzmann, Norman. “Semantics, History of.” Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 8 vols. Ed. Edwards, Paul. New York: Macmillan, 1967. 358–406.Google Scholar

Ladner, Gerhart B.The Idea of Reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladner, Gerhart B.. Ad Imaginem Dei: The Image of Man in Mediaeval Art. Wimmer Lecture, 1962. Latrobe, Pennsylvania: The Archabbey Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Ladner, Gerhart B.. “The Physical Anthropology of Saint Gregory of Nyssa.”Dumbarton Oaks Papers 12 (1958): 59–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Language Evolution. Ed. Christiansen, Morten H. and Kirby, Simon. Oxford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lanham, Richard A.The Motives of Eloquence: Literary Rhetoric in the Renaissance. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Lawler, Traugott. The One and the Many in the Canterbury Tales. Hamden, CT: Archon Books, 1980.Google Scholar

Leach, Edmund. “Lévi-Strauss in the Garden of Eden: An Examination of Some Recent Developments in the Analysis of Myth.”Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences ser. 2, 23 (1961): 386–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leff, Gordon. The Dissolution of the Medieval Outlook: An Essay on Intellectual and Spiritual Change in the Fourteenth Century. New York: Harper & Row, 1976.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Paul. Die Parodie im Mittelalter. Stuttgart: A. Hiersemann, 1922, rpt. 1963.Google Scholar

Leicester, H. Marshall Jr.The Disenchanted Self: Representing the Subject in the “Canterbury Tales.”Berkeley, Oxford: University of California Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Leicester, H. Marshall Jr.. “The Harmony of Chaucer's Parlement: A Dissonant Voice.”Chaucer Review 9 (1974): 15–34.Google Scholar

Leicester, H. Marshall, Jr. “Piety and Resistance: A Note on the Representation of Religious Feeling in the Canterbury Tales.” The Endless Knot: Essays on Old and Middle English in Honor of Marie Borroff. Ed. Tavormina, M. Teresa and Yeager, R. F.. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1995. 151–60.Google Scholar

Leo, Ulrich. “The Unfinished Convivio and Dante's Rereading of the Aeneid.”Mediaeval Studies 13 (1951): 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leonard, John. Naming in Paradise: Milton and the Language of Adam and Eve. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Leupin, Alexandre. Barbarolexis: Medieval Writing and Sexuality. Trans. Kate M. Cooper. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levitan, Alan. “The Parody of Pentecost in Chaucer's Summoner's Tale.”University of Toronto Quarterly 40 (1971): 236–46.Google Scholar

Levy, Bernard S.“Biblical Parody in the Summoner's Tale.”Texas Studies in Literature and Language 11 (1966): 45–60.Google Scholar

Lewis, C. S.“Four-Letter Words.”The Critical Quarterly 3 (1961): 118–22.Google Scholar

Lindberg, David C.John Pecham and the Science of Optics: Perspectiva Communis. The University of Wisconsin Publications in Medieval Science 14. Madison, Milwaukee, and London: University of Wisconsin Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Livesey, Steven J., and Richard, H. Rouse. “Nimrod the Astronomer.”Traditio 37 (1981): 203–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, Genevieve. The Man of Reason: ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Western Philosophy. 2nd edn. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar

Lonergan, Bernard J., S J. Verbum: Word and Idea in Aquinas. Ed. Burrell, David B., CSC. University of Notre Dame Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Lo Piparo, Franco. “Sign and Grammar in Dante: A Non-Modistic Language Theory.” The History of Linguistics in Italy. Ed. Ramat, Paolo, Hans-, J. Niederehe and Koerner, Konrad. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science Series 3, vol. 33. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1986. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lord, Carla. “The Ovide Moralisé and the Old Testament.” Tribute to Lotte Brand Philip. Ed. William, W. Clark et al. New York: Abaris Books, Inc., 1985. 95–102.Google Scholar

Lubac, Henri. Exégèse médiévale: Les quatre sens de l'Écriture. Paris: Aubier, 1959–64.Google Scholar

Luscombe, D. E.“Peter Abelard.”A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy. 279–307.

Lusignan, Serge. “Le français et le latin aux XIIIe–XIVe siècles: pratiques des langues et pensée linguistique.”Annales E.S.C. 42, no. 4 (1987): 955–67.Google Scholar

Lusignan, Serge. “Le Latin Était la Langue Maternelle des Romains: la fortune d'un argument à la fin du Moyen Age.” Préludes à la Renaissance. Ed. Bozzolo, Carla and Ornato, Ezio. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1992. 265–303.Google Scholar

Lusignan, Serge. Parler Vulgairement: Les intellectuels et la langue française aux XIIIe et XIVe siècles. Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal, 1986.Google Scholar

Lusignan, Serge. “La topique de la translatio studii et les traductions françaises de textes savants au XIVe siècle.” Traduction et traducteurs au Moyen Âge. Ed. Contamine, Geneviève. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1989. 303–15.Google Scholar

Lutz, Cora E.“Remigius' Ideas on the Origins of the Seven Liberal Arts.”Mediaevalia et Humanistica 10 (1956): 41–49.Google Scholar

Machan, Tim William. “Chaucer as Translator.” The Medieval Translator: The Theory and Practice of Translation in the Middle Ages. Ed. Ellis, Roger. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1989. 55–67.Google Scholar

Machan, Tim William. Techniques of Translation: Chaucer's “Boece.”Norman, OK.: Pilgrim Books, 1985.Google Scholar

Maguire, Henry. “Adam and the Animals: Allegory and the Literal Sense in Early Christian Art.”Dumbarton Oaks Papers 41 (1987): 363–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mâle, Emile. “La légende de la Mort de Caïn – à propos d'un chapiteau de Tarbes.”Revue Archéologique 3e série, 21 (1893): 186–94.Google Scholar

Mandelbaum, Allen, Oldcorn, Anthony, and Ross, Charles, eds. Lectura Dantis: Inferno. California Lectura Dantis: 1. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Manetti, Giovanni. Theories of the Sign in Classical Antiquity. Trans. Christine Richardson. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Mann, Jill. “Jean de Meun and the Castration of Saturn.” Poetry and Philosophy in the Middle Ages: A Festschrift for Peter Dronke. Ed. Marenbon, John. Mittellateinische Studien und Texte 29. Leiden, Boston & Cologne: Brill, 2001. 309–26.Google Scholar

Manzalaoui, Mahmoud. “Chaucer and Science.” Geoffrey Chaucer. Ed. Brewer, Derek. Writers and Their Background. London: G. Bell & Sons, 1974. 224–61.Google Scholar

Marenbon, John. Early Medieval Philosophy (480–1150): An Introduction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983.Google Scholar

Mariani, Valerio. “Commedia.”Enciclopedia Dantesca. 2:79–118.

Marigo, Aristide, ed. De Vulgari Eloquentia. 3rd edn. Florence: Le Monnier, 1968.Google Scholar

Markley, Robert. Fallen Languages: Crises of Representation in Newtonian England, 1660–1740. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Marks, Herbert. “Hollowed Names: Vox and Vanitas in the Purgatorio.”Dante Studies 110 (1992): 135–78.Google Scholar

Markus, R. A.Saeculum: History and Society in the Theology of St Augustine. Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Markus, R. A. “St. Augustine on Signs.” Augustine: A Collection of Critical Essays. Ed. Markus, R. A.. New York: Doubleday Anchor, 1972. 61–91.Google Scholar

Marrou, Henri-Irénée. History of Education in Antiquity. Trans. George Lamb. New York: Mentor, 1956.Google Scholar

Marrou, Henri-Irénée. Saint Augustin et la fin de la culture antique. Paris: E. de Boccard, 1938.Google Scholar

Martin, Priscilla. Chaucer's Women: Nuns, Wives, and Amazons. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Maurer, Armand. “William of Ockham on Language and Reality.”Miscellanea Mediaevalia 13, no. 2 (1981): 795–802.Google Scholar

Mazzeo, Joseph Anthony. “Dante's Three Communities: Mediation and Order.” The World of Dante. Ed. Chandler, S. Bernard and Molinaro, J. A.. University of Toronto Press, 1966. 62–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mazzeo, Joseph Anthony. Medieval Cultural Tradition in Dante's “Comedy.”Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Mazzeo, Joseph Anthony. “St. Augustine's Rhetoric of Silence: Truth vs. Eloquence and Things vs. Signs.” Renaissance and Seventeenth-Century Studies. New York: Columbia University Press, 1962, rpt. 1964. 1–28.Google Scholar

Mazzocco, Angelo. “‘La lingua ch'io parlai fu tutta spenta’: Dante's Reappraisal of the Adamic Language (Paradiso XXVI, 124–138).” Linguistic Theories in Dante and the Humanists: Studies of Language and Intellectual History in Late Medieval and Early Renaissance Italy. Brill's Studies in Intellectual History 38. Leiden, New York & Cologne: E. J. Brill, 1993. 159–79.Google Scholar

Mazzotta, Giuseppe. “Dante and the Virtues of Exile.”Poetics Today 5:3 (1984): 645–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mazzotta, Giuseppe. Dante, Poet of the Desert. Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Mazzotta, Giuseppe. The World at Play in Boccaccio's Decameron. Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

McClellan, William. “Bakhtin's Theory of Dialogic Discourse, Medieval Rhetorical Theory, and the Multi-Voiced Structure of the Clerk's Tale.”Exemplaria 1 (1989): 461–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGerr, Rosemarie P.Chaucer's Open Books: Resistance to Closure in Medieval Discourse. Gainesville: University of Florida Press, 1998.Google Scholar

McKeon, Richard. “Aristotle's Conception of Language and the Arts of Language.”Classical Philology 41 (1946): 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKeon, Richard. “Aristotle's Conception of Language and the Arts of Language (Concluded).”Classical Philology 42 (1947): 21–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKeon, Richard. “Rhetoric in the Middle Ages.”Speculum 17 (1942): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKusick, James C.Coleridge's Philosophy of Language. Yale Studies in English 195. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

McNally, R. E.“The ‘Tres Linguae Sacrae’ in Early Irish Bible Exegesis.”Theological Studies 19 (1958): 395–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Medici, Mario. “I.”Enciclopedia Dantesca. 3:345.

Mellinkoff, Ruth. “Cain's Monstrous Progeny in Beowulf: Part II, Post-Diluvian Survival.”Anglo-Saxon England 9 (1981): 183–97.Google Scholar

Mengaldo, Pier Vincenzo. “Appunti sul canto XXVI del ‘Paradiso’.” Linguistica e retorica di Dante. Saggi di varia umanitá 21. Pisa: Nistri-Lischi, 1978. 223–46.Google Scholar

Mengaldo, Pier Vincenzo. “L'elegia ‘umile’.”Giornale storico della letteratura italiana 143 (1966): 177–98.Google Scholar

Mengaldo, Pier Vincenzo. “Gramatica.”Enciclopedia Dantesca. 3:259–64.

Menner, Robert J., ed. The Poetical Dialogues of Solomon and Saturn. New York: MLA, 1941.Google Scholar

Menocal, María Rosa. Shards of Love: Exile and the Origins of the Lyric. Durham, NC, & London: Duke University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Middleton, Anne. “Chaucer's ‘New Men’ and the Good of Literature in the Canterbury Tales.” Literature and Society: Selected Papers from the English Institute, 1978. Ed. Said, Edward W.. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980. 15–56.Google Scholar

Anne, Middleton. “Two Infinites: Grammatical Metaphor in Piers Plowman.”ELH 39 (1972): 169–88.Google Scholar

Minnis, Alastair J. “A leur fez cousines: Words, Deeds and Proper Speech in Jean de Meun and Chaucer.” Medieval Heritage: Essays in Honour of Tadahiro Ikegami. Ed. Kanno, Masahiko et al. Tokyo: Yushodo Press Co., Ltd., 1997. 31–63.Google Scholar

Minnis, Alastair J. “De Impedimento Sexus: Women's Bodies and Medieval Impediments to Female Ordination.” Medieval Theology and the Natural Body. Ed. Biller, Peter and Minnis, A. J.. York Studies in Medieval Theology I. York Medieval Press, 1997. 109–40.Google Scholar

Minnis, Alastair J.. Magister Amoris: The “Roman de la Rose” and Vernacular Hermeneutics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minnis, Alastair J.. Medieval Theory of Authorship: Scholastic Literary Attitudes in the Later Middle Ages. London: Scolar Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Minnis, A. J., and Scott, A. B., eds. (with the assistance of David Wallace). Medieval Literary Theory and Criticism c.1100–c.1375: The Commentary Tradition (1988). Rev. edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Moi, Toril. “Desire in Language: Andreas Capellanus and the Controversy of Courtly Love.” Medieval Literature: Criticism, Ideology & History. Ed. Aers, David. Brighton, Sussex: Harvester, 1986. 11–33.Google Scholar

Moir, A. L.The World Map in Hereford Cathedral. Hereford: The Cathedral, 1970.Google Scholar

Monroe, William H.“A Roll-Manuscript of Peter of Poitiers' Compendium.”Bulletin of the Cleveland Museum of Art 65 (1978): 92–107.Google Scholar

Moore, Philip S.The Works of Peter of Poitiers. Washington, DC: Catholic University, 1936.Google Scholar

Morey, James H.“Peter Comestor, Biblical Paraphrase, and the Medieval Popular Bible.”Speculum 68 (1993): 6–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morey, James H.. “Petrus Comestor.”Speculum 68 (1998): 6–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muratova, Xénia. “‘Adam donne leurs noms aux animaux’.”Studi Medievali ser. 3, 18:2 (1977): 367–94.Google Scholar

Murdoch, Brian. The Medieval Popular Bible: Expansions of Genesis in the Middle Ages. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2003.Google Scholar

Murphy, James J.Rhetoric in the Middle Ages. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Muscatine, Charles. Chaucer and the French Tradition: A Study in Style and Meaning. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Muscatine, Charles. “Courtly Literature and Vulgar Language.” Court and Poet: Selected Proceedings of the Third Congress of the International Courtly Literature Society (Liverpool, 1980). Ed. Burgess, Glyn S.. Liverpool: Francis Cairns, 1981. 1–19.Google Scholar

Muscatine, Charles. “The Fabliaux, Courtly Culture, and the (Re)Invention of Vulgarity.”Obscenity. 281–92.

Muscatine, Charles. The Old French Fabliaux. New Haven, London: Yale University Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Musurillo, Herbert, ed. The Acts of the Christian Martyrs. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Myerowitz, Molly. Ovid's Games of Love. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Myles, Robert. Chaucerian Realism. Chaucer Studies 20. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1994.Google Scholar

Nardi, Bruno. Dante e la cultura medievale. 2nd edn. Bari: Laterza, 1949.Google Scholar

Nardi, Bruno. “Due capitoli di filosofia dantesca.”Giornale storico della letteratura italiana suppl. 19–21 (1922): 260–64.Google Scholar

Nencioni, Giovanni. “Dante e la Retorica.” Dante e Bologna nei Tempi di Dante. Bologna: Commissione per i Testi di Lingua, 1967. 91–112.Google Scholar

New Perspectives in Chaucer Criticism. Ed. Rose, Donald M.. Norman, Oklahoma: Pilgrim Books, 1981.Google Scholar

Newman, Barbara. From Virile Woman to WomanChrist: Studies in Medieval Religion and Literature. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nichols, Stephen G.“On the Sociology of Medieval Manuscript Annotation.”Annotation and Its Texts. 43–73.

Nichols, Stephen G. “Prophetic Discourse: St. Augustine to Christine de Pizan.” The Bible in the Middle Ages: Its Influence on Literature and Art. Ed. Levy, Bernard S.. Medieval & Renaissance Texts & Studies 89. Binghamton, NY, 1992. 51–76.Google Scholar

Nims, Margaret F., IBVM. “Translatio: ‘Difficult Statement’ in Medieval Poetic Theory.”University of Toronto Quarterly 43 (1974): 215–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nitzsche, J. C.“Creation in Genesis and Nature in Chaucer's General Prologue 1–18.”Papers on Language and Literature 14 (1978): 459–64.Google Scholar

Nohrnberg, James. “Justifying Narrative: Commentary within Biblical Storytelling.”Annotation and Its Texts. 3–42.

Nolan, Barbara. Chaucer and the Tradition of the “Roman Antique.” Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature 15. Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nykrog, Per. “Obscene or Not Obscene: Lady Reason, Jean de Meun, and the Fisherman from Pont-sur-Seine.”Obscenity. 319–31.

Nyquist, Mary. “Gynesis, Genesis, Exegesis, and Milton's Eve.” Cannibals, Witches and Divorce: Estranging the Renaissance. Ed. Garber, Marjorie. English Institute Essays n.s. 11. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987. 147–208.Google Scholar

Obscenity: Social Control and Artistic Creation in the European Middle Ages. Ed. Ziolkowski, Jan M.. Leiden, Boston & Cologne: Brill, 1998.Google Scholar

O'Connell, Robert J., S J. Art and the Christian Intelligence in St. Augustine. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

The Olde Daunce: Love, Friendship, Sex, and Marriage in the Medieval World. Ed. Edwards, Robert R. and Spector, Stephen. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Olender, Maurice. The Languages of Paradise: Aryans and Semites, A Match Made in Heaven. Trans. Arthur Goldhammer. New York: Other Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Olson, Glending. “Chaucer, Dante, and the Structure of Fragment VIII (G) of the Canterbury Tales.”Chaucer Review 16 (1982): 222–36.Google Scholar

Olson, Glending. “Inferno 27 and the Perversions of Pentecost.”Dante Studies 117 (1999): 21–33.Google Scholar

Olson, Glending. “Making and Poetry in the Age of Chaucer.”Comparative Literature 31 (1979): 272–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

On the Medieval Theory of Signs. Ed. Eco, Umberto and Marmo, Costantino. Foundations of Semiotics 21. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ong, Walter J., S J. “Wit and Mystery: A Revaluation in Mediaeval Latin Hymnody.”Speculum 22 (1947): 310–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ovitt, George Jr.The Restoration of Perfection: Labor and Technology in Medieval Culture. New Brunswick and London: Rutgers University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Padley, G. R.Grammatical Theory in Western Europe 1500–1700: The Latin Tradition. Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Pagani, Ileana. La teoria linguistica di Dante: “De Vulgari Eloquentia”: discussioni, scelte, proposte. Naples: Liguori Editore, 1982.Google Scholar

Pagden, Anthony. European Encounters with the New World: From Renaissance to Romanticism. New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Pagliaro, Antonino. “Dialetti e lingue nell'oltretomba.” Ulisse II. Messina & Florence: G. d'Anna, 1967. 433–65.Google Scholar

Pagliaro, Antonino. “La dottrina linguistica di Dante.”Quaderni di Roma 1 (1947): 485–501.Google Scholar

Pagliaro, Antonino. “I ‘primissima signa’ nella dottrina linguistica di Dante.” Nuovi saggi di critica semantica. Biblioteca di cultura contemporanea 51. Messina & Florence: G. d'Anna, 1956. 215–46.Google Scholar

Pagliaro, Antonino. “Teoria e prassi Linguistica.”Ulisse II. 529–83.

Palmieri, Ugo. “Appunti di linguistica dantesca.”Studi Danteschi 41 (1964): 45–53.Google Scholar

Pardes, Ilana. Countertraditions in the Bible: A Feminist Approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Parker, Patricia. Inescapable Romance. Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Patterson, Lee. Chaucer and the Subject of History. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Patterson, Lee. “The ‘Parson's Tale’ and the Quitting of the ‘Canterbury Tales.’” Traditio 34 (1978): 331–80.Google Scholar

Patterson, Lee. “Perpetual Motion: Alchemy and the Technology of the Self.”Studies in the Age of Chaucer 15 (1993): 25–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearcy, Roy J. “Modes of Signification and the Humor of Obscene Diction in the Fabliaux.” The Humor of the Fabliaux. Ed. Thomas, D. Cooke and Benjamin, L. Honeycutt. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1974. 163–96.Google Scholar

Pearsall, Derek. The Canterbury Tales. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1985.Google Scholar

Pearsall, Derek. The Life of Geoffrey Chaucer: A Critical Biography. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.Google Scholar

Peck, Russell A.“Chaucer and the Nominalist Questions.”Speculum 53 (1978): 745–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peck, Russell A.“The Ideas of ‘Entente’ and Translation in Chaucer's Second Nun's Tale.”Annuale Mediaevale 8 (1967): 17–37.Google Scholar

Peck, Russell A.“Public Dreams and Private Myths: Perspective in Middle English Literature.”Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 90 (1975): 461–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pelen, Marc M.Latin Poetic Irony in the “Roman de la Rose.”Liverpool; Wolfeboro, NH: Francis Cairns, 1987.Google Scholar

Pépin, Jean. “Saint Augustin et la fonction protreptique de l'allégorie.”Recherches Augustiniennes 1 (1958): 243–86.Google Scholar

Pézard, André. Dante sous la pluie de feu. Études de Philosophie Médiévale 40. Paris: J. Vrin, 1950.Google Scholar

Pézard, André. “Les trois langues de Cacciaguida.”Revue des études italiennes n.s. 13 (1967): 217–38.Google Scholar

Phillips, John A.Eve: The History of an Idea. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1984.Google Scholar

Pinborg, Jan. “The English Contribution to Logic before Ockham.”Synthèse 40 (1979): 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poggioli, Renato. “Tragedy or Romance? A Reading of the Paolo and Francesca Episode in Dante's Inferno.”Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 72 (1957): 313–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poirion, Daniel. “De la signification selon Jean de Meun.”Archéologie du signe. 165–85.

Poirion, Daniel. “Les mots et les choses selon Jean de Meun.”L'Information littéraire 26 (1974): 7–11.Google Scholar

Poirion, Daniel. “Narcisse et Pygmalion dans Le Roman de la Rose.” Essays in Honor of Louis Francis Solano. Ed. Raymond, J. Cormier and Urban, T. Holmes. University of North Carolina Studies in the Romance Languages and Literatures 92. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1970. 153–65.Google Scholar

The Portable Medieval Reader. Ed. Ross, J. B. and McLaughlin, M. M.. New York: Viking Press, 1949.Google Scholar

Pratt, Robert A.“Chaucer Borrowing from Himself.”Modern Language Quarterly 7 (1946): 259–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pulsiano, Phillip. “Redeemed Language and the Ending of Troilus and Criseyde.”Sign, Sentence, Discourse. 153–74.

Purdon, Liam O.“Chaucer's Lak of Stedfastnesse: A Revalorization of the Word.”Sign, Sentence, Discourse. 144–52.

Quilligan, Maureen. “Allegory, Allegoresis, and the Deallegorization of Language: The Roman de la Rose, the De Planctu Naturae, and the Parlement of Foules.” Allegory, Myth, and Symbol. Ed. Morton, W. Bloomfield. Harvard Studies in English 9. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981. 163–86.Google Scholar

Quilligan, Maureen. The Allegory of Female Authority: Christine de Pizan's Cité Des Dames. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Quilligan, Maureen. “Words and Sex: The Language of Allegory in the De Planctu Naturae, the Roman de la Rose, and Book III of The Faerie Queene.”Allegorica 2 (1977): 195–216.Google Scholar

Quinones, Ricardo J.The Changes of Cain: Violence and the Lost Brother in Cain and Abel Literature. Princeton University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rambeau, A.“Chaucer's ‘House of Fame’ in seinem verhältniss zu Dante's ‘Divina Commedia’.”Englische Studien 3 (1880): 209–68.Google Scholar

Rappoport, Angelo S.Myths and Legends of Ancient Israel. London: Gresham Publishing Company, 1928.Google Scholar

Ray, Roger. “Rhetorical Scepticism and Verisimilar Narrative in John of Salisbury's Historia Pontificalis.” Classical Rhetoric and Medieval Historiography. Ed. Breisach, Ernst. Studies in Medieval Culture 19. Kalamazoo: Mediaeval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University, 1985. 61–102.Google Scholar

Raybin, David. “Chaucer's Creation and Recreation of the Lyf of Seynt Cecile.”Chaucer Review 32 (1997): 196–212.Google Scholar

Réau, Louis. Iconographie de l'art chrétien. 3 vols. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1955–59.Google Scholar

Reiss, Edmund. “Ambiguous Realities and Authorial Deceptions in Fourteenth-Century Fictions.”Sign, Sentence, Discourse. 113–37.

Reiss, Edmund. “Chaucer's Fiction and Linguistic Self-Consciousness in the Late Middle Ages.”Chaucer and the Craft of Fiction. 97–119.

Reiss, Edmund. “The Story of Lamech and Its Place in Medieval Drama.”Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 2 (1972): 35–48.Google Scholar

Rethinking the “Romance of the Rose”: Text, Image, Reception. Ed. Brownlee, Kevin and Huot, Sylvia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reynolds, Suzanne. Medieval Reading: Grammar, Rhetoric and the Classical Text. Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature 27. Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richter, Michael. Sprache und Gesellschaft im Mittelalter: Untersuchungen zur Mündlichen Kommunikation in England von der Mitte des Elften bis zum Beginn des Vierzehnten Jahrhunderts. Monographien zur Geschichte des Mittelalters, 18. Stuttgart: Anton Hiersemann, 1979.Google Scholar

Ricks, Christopher. Milton's Grand Style. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Riddy, Felicity. “Engendering Pity in the Franklin's Tale.” Feminist Readings in Middle English Literature: The Wife of Bath and All Her Sect. Ed. Evans, Ruth and Johnson, Lesley. London and New York: Routledge, 1994. 54–71.Google Scholar

Rigby, S. H.Chaucer in Context: Society, Allegory and Gender. Manchester University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Rist, John M.Augustine: Ancient Thought Baptized. Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rizzo, Stefano. “Il De Vulgari Eloquentia e l'unita del pensiero linguistico di Dante.”Dante Studies 87 (1969): 69–88.Google Scholar

Robertson, D. W. Jr.A Preface to Chaucer: Studies in Medieval Perspectives. Princeton University Press, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robins, R. H.Ancient & Mediaeval Grammatical Theory in Europe. 1951; rpt. Port Washington, NY & London: Kennikat Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Robinson, Fred C.“The Significance of Names in Old English Literature.”Anglia 86 (1968): 14–58.Google Scholar

Robinson, F. N.“Chaucer and Dante.”Journal of Comparative Literature 1 (1903): 292–97.Google Scholar

Robinson, Richard. Essays in Greek Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Bruce A.“The Contrary Tales of the Second Nun and the Canon's Yeoman.”Chaucer Review 2 (1968): 278–91.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Joel W.“The Garden Story Forward and Backward: The Non-Narrative Dimension of Genesis 2–3.”Prooftexts 1 (1981): 1–27.Google Scholar

Rothwell, W.“The Trilingual England of Geoffrey Chaucer.”Studies in the Age of Chaucer 16 (1994): 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rotta, Paolo. La filosofia del linguaggio nella patristica e nella scolastica. Turin: Fratelli Bocca, 1909.Google Scholar

Rowe, Donald W.“Reson in Jean's Roman de la Rose: Modes of Characterization and Dimensions of Meaning.”Mediaevalia 10 (1984): 97–126.Google Scholar

Roy, Bruno. “L'humour érotique au XVe siècle.” L'Érotisme au Moyen Âge. Ed. Roy, Bruno. Montréal: Aurore, 1977. 155–64.Google Scholar

Rubinstein, Nicolai. “The Beginnings of Political Thought in Florence.”Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 5 (1942): 198–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rudd, Gillian. Managing Language in “Piers Plowman.” Piers Plowman Studies 9. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1994.Google Scholar

Ruthven, K. K.“The Poet as Etymologist.”Critical Quarterly 11 (1969): 9–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salisbury, Joyce E.“The Latin Doctors of the Church on Sexuality.”Journal of Medieval History 12 (1986): 279–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salmon, Vivian. “Language-Planning in Seventeenth-Century England: Its Context and Aims.” In Memory of J. R. Firth. Ed. Bazell, C. E., Catford, J. C., Halliday, M. A. K., and Robins, R. H.. London: Longmans, 1966. 370–97.Google Scholar

Salter, Elizabeth, ed. Nicholas Love's Myrrour of the Blessed Lyf of Jesu Christ. Analecta Cartusiana 10. Salzburg: University of Salzburg, 1974.Google Scholar

Sarolli, Gian Roberto. “Dante ‘scriba Dei’.”Convivium n.s. 31 (1963): 385–422, 513–44, 641–71.Google Scholar

Scattergood, John. “Chaucer in the Suburbs.” Reading the Past: Essays on Medieval and Renaissance Literature. Dublin: Four Courts Press, 1996. 128–45.Google Scholar

Schibanoff, Susan. “The New Reader and Female Textuality in Two Early Commentaries on Chaucer.”Studies in the Age of Chaucer 10 (1988): 71–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schildgen, Brenda Deen. “Dante's Neologisms in the Paradiso and the Latin Rhetorical Tradition.”Dante Studies 107 (1989): 101–19.Google Scholar

Schless, Howard H.Chaucer and Dante: A Revaluation. Norman, Oklahoma: Pilgrim Books, 1984.Google Scholar

Schmidt, A. V. C.“Chaucer's Nembrot: A Note on The Former Age.”Medium Aevum 47 (1978): 304–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, A. V. C., ed. The General Prologue to The Canterbury Tales and The Canon's Yeoman's Prologue and Tale. The London Medieval and Renaissance Series. University of London Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Schnapp, Jeffrey T. “Lectura Dantis: Inferno 30.” Sparks and Seeds: Medieval Literature and Its Afterlife: Essays in Honor of John Freccero. Ed. Dana, E. Stewart and Cornish, Alison. Turnhout: Brepols, 2000. 75–85.Google Scholar

Schnapp, Jeffrey T.“Paradiso.”Dante Encyclopedia. 674–78.

Schnapp, Jeffrey T.“Virgin Words: Hildegard of Bingen's Lingua Ignota and the Development of Imaginary Languages Ancient to Modern.”Exemplaria 3 (1991): 267–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, Regina M.Remembering and Repeating: Biblical Creation in “Paradise Lost.”Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Schwarz, Werner. Principles and Problems of Biblical Translation. Cambridge University Press, 1955.Google Scholar

Scott, J. A.Review of Jenaro-MacLennan. Modern Language Review 71 (1976): 932–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shankland, Hugh. “Dante ‘Aliger’.”Modern Language Review 70 (1975): 764–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shereshevsky, Ezra. “Hebrew Traditions in Peter Comestor's Historia Scholastica.”Jewish Quarterly Review 59 (1968–69): 268–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sherman, Gail Berkeley. “Saints, Nuns, and Speech in the Canterbury Tales.” Images of Sainthood in Medieval Europe. Ed. Renate, Blumenfeld-Kosinski and Szell, Timea. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1991. 136–60.Google Scholar

Shoaf, R. A.Chaucer, Dante, and the Currency of the Word: Money, Images, and Reference in Late Medieval Poetry. Norman, OK: Pilgrim Books, 1983.Google Scholar

Shoaf, R. A. “‘Unwemmed Custance’: Circulation, Property, and Incest in the Man of Law's Tale.”Exemplaria 2 (1990): 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Short, Ian. “On Bilingualism in Anglo-Norman England.”Romance Philology 33 (1980): 467–79.Google Scholar

Sidebottom, E. M.The Christ of the Fourth Gospel, in the Light of First-Century Thought. London: S.P.C.K., 1961.Google Scholar

Sign, Sentence, Discourse: Language in Medieval Thought and Literature. Ed. Julian, N. Wasserman and Lois, Y. Roney. Syracuse University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Sikes, J. G.Peter Abailard. Cambridge University Press, 1932.Google Scholar

Singleton, Charles S.Dante Studies 1: “Commedia”: Elements of Structure. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Singleton, Charles S.Dante Studies 2: Journey to Beatrice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Singleton, Charles S.An Essay on the “Vita Nuova.”Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1949.Google Scholar

Sisam, Kenneth, ed. The Nun's Priest's Tale. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1927.Google Scholar

Skinner, John. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Genesis. Rev. ed. New York: Scribner's, 1925.Google Scholar

Sklute, Larry. Virtue of Necessity: Inconclusiveness and Narrative Form in Chaucer's Poetry. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Smalley, Beryl. “Andrew of St. Victor, Abbot of Wigmore: A Twelfth Century Hebraist.”Recherches de Théologie Ancienne et Médiévale 10 (1938): 358–73.Google Scholar

Smalley, Beryl. “L'Exégèse Biblique du 12e Siècle.” Entretiens sur la Renaissance du 12e Siècle. Ed. Maurice, Gandillac and Jeauneau, Edouard. Paris: Mouton, 1968. 273–83.Google Scholar

Smalley, Beryl. The Study of the Bible in the Middle Ages. University of Notre Dame Press, 1952; rpt. 1964.Google Scholar