Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-fnprw Total loading time: 0.981 Render date: 2022-08-16T22:41:07.960Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2021

Peter Thielke
Affiliation:
Pomona College, California
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Kant's Prolegomena
A Critical Guide
, pp. 235 - 247
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Kant, Immanuel (1902). Akademie Ausgabe: Kant’s gesammelte Schriften. Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, eds. (De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1992a [1792]). Dohna-Wundlacken Logic, in Lectures on Logic, Young, J. Michael, trans. and ed. (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1992b [1800]). Jäsche Logic, in Lectures on Logic, Young, J. Michael, trans. and ed. (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1992c [1780]). Vienna Logic, in Lectures on Logic, Young, J. Michael, trans. and ed. (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1992d [1756]). The Employment in Natural Philosophy of Metaphysics Combined with Geometry, of which Sample I contains the Physical Monadology, in Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1770, Walford, David, trans. and ed. (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1992e [1763]). The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God, in Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1770, Walford, David, trans. and ed. (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1992f [1766]). Dreams of a Spirit-Seer, in Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1770, Walford, David, trans. and ed. (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996a [1817]). Lectures on the Philosophical Doctrine of Religion, in Religion and Rational Theology, Wood, Allen, trans. and ed. (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996b [1793]). Religion Within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, George di Giovanni, trans., in Religion and Rational Theology, Wood, Allen, ed. (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996c [1785]). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, in Practical Philosophy, Gregor, Mary, trans. and ed. (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996d [1788]). The Critique of Practical Reason, in Practical Philosophy, Gregor, Mary, trans. and ed. (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996e [1797]). The Metaphysics of Morals, in Practical Philosophy, Gregor, Mary, trans. and ed. (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1997a [1783]). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, Hatfield, Gary, trans. and ed. (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1997b). Lectures on Metaphysics, Ameriks, Karl and Naragon, Steve, trans. and ed. (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1998 [1781/87]). Critique of Pure Reason, Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen, trans. and ed. (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1999). Correspondence, Zweig, Arnulf, trans. and ed. (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2001 [1783]). Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik, die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können, Pollok, Konstantin, ed. (Meiner Verlag).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2002a [1790]). Critique of the Power of Judgment, Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews, trans. (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2002b). Theoretical Philosophy after 1781, Allison, Henry and Heath, Peter, eds. (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2002c [1786]). The Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, Michael Friedman, trans., in Theoretical Philosophy after 1781 (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2002d [1790]). “On a Discovery Whereby any New Criteria of Pure Reason is to Be Made Superfluous By an Older One,” Henry Allison, trans., in Theoretical Philosophy after 1781 (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2002e [1793]). “What Real Progress Has Metaphysics Made in Germany Since the Time of Leibniz and Wolff?”, Peter Heath, trans., in Theoretical Philosophy after 1781 (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2006 [1798]). Kant: Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, Louden, Robert, trans. and ed. (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2012). Lectures on Anthropology, Robert Clewis, Robert Louden, Felicitas Munzel and Allen Wood, trans. (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Secondary Sources

Ainslie, Donald (2015). Hume’s True Skepticism (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen (2012 [1782]). Zugabe zu den Göttingischen Anzeigen von gelehrten Sachen: erster Band (Nabu Press).Google Scholar
Allais, Lucy (2007). “Kant’s Idealism and the Secondary Quality Analogy,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45(3), 459–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allais, Lucy (2015). Manifest Reality: Kant’s Idealism and his Realism (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry (1989). “Kant’s Refutation of Materialism,” The Monist 72(2), 190208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry (2001). Kant’s Theory of Taste (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry (2004). Kant’s Transcendental Idealism, 2nd ed. (Yale University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry (2008). Custom and Reason in Hume: A Kantian Reading of the First Book of the Treatise (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry (2015). Kant’s Transcendental Deduction (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altmann, Alexander (2011 [1973]). Moses Mendelssohn: A Biographical Study (Littman Library of Jewish Civilization).Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl (1978). “Kant’s Transcendental Deduction as a Regressive Argument,” Kant-Studien 69, 273–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl (2000). Kant’s Theory of Mind, 2nd ed. (Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl (2003). “Kant’s Transcendental Deduction as a Regressive Argument,” in Interpreting Kant’s Critiques (Oxford University Press), 5166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl (2006). “A Common-Sense Kant?” in Kant and the Historical Turn: Philosophy as Critical Interpretation (Oxford University Press), 108133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl (2016). “Ginsborg, Nature and Normativity,” British Journal of Aesthetics 56(4), 389–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl (2019). Kantian Subjects (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Lanier (2015). The Poverty of Conceptual Truth: Kant’s Analytic-Synthetic Distinction and the Limits of Metaphysics (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander (2013 [1739]). Metaphysics: A Critical Translation with Kant’s Elucidations, Selected Notes, and Related Materials, Fugate, Courtney and Hymers, John, eds. (Bloomsbury).Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre (1710). An Historical and Critical Dictionary (C. Harper et al.).Google Scholar
Beattie, James (1778 [1770]). An Essay on the Nature and Immutability of Truth, in Opposition to Sophistry and Scepticism, 6th ed. (Edward and Charles Dilly).Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White, ed. (1950). “Editor’s Introduction,” Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics (Library of the Liberal Arts).Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White (1969). Early German Philosophy: Kant and His Predecessors (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Beizaei, Banafsheh (2017). “Kant on Perception, Experience and Judgments Thereof,” Kantian Review 22(3), 347–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan (1974). Kant’s Dialectic (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Bielefeldt, Heiner (2003). Symbolic Representation in Kant’s Practical Philosophy (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Graham (1962). Kant’s Theory of Knowledge (Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Bird, Graham (2006). The Revolutionary Kant (Open Court).Google Scholar
Black, Tim and Gressis, Robert (2017). “True Religion in Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25(2), 244–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Matthew (manuscript). “Kant’s Hylomorphism.”Google Scholar
Breitenbach, Angela (manuscript). “Cognition, Reflection, and Analogy.”Google Scholar
Bricke, John (1975). “On the Interpretation of Hume’s ‘Dialogues’,” Religious Studies, 11(1), 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callanan, John (2006). “Kant’s Transcendental Strategy,” The Philosophical Quarterly, 56, 360–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callanan, John (2008). “Kant on Analogy,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16(4), 747–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callanan, John (2017). “The Ideal of Reason,” in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: A Critical Guide, O’Shea, James, ed. (Cambridge University Press), 243–58.Google Scholar
Capozzi, Mirella (1987). “Kant on Logic, Language and Thought,” in Speculative Grammar, Universal Grammar, Philosophical Analysis: Papers in the Philosophy of Language, Buzetti, Dino and Ferriani, Maurizio, eds. (John Benjamins), 97147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carl, Wolfgang (1997). “Apperception and Spontaneity,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5, 147–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, Emily (1997). “Kant on Intuition and Geometry,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 27(4), 489512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chance, Brian (2013). “Causal Powers, Hume’s Early German Critics, and Kant’s Response to Hume,” Kant-Studien 104(2), 213–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chance, Brian and Pasternack, Lawrence (2019). “Baumgarten and Kant on Rational Theology: Deism, Theism, and the Role of Analogy,” in Kant’s Lectures on Metaphysics: A Critical Guide, Fugate, Courtney, ed. (Cambridge University Press), 214–32.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2007). “Belief in Kant,” The Philosophical Review 116(3), 323–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2009). “Are Supersensibles Really Possible? The Evidential Role of Symbols,” in Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants, Rohden, Valerio, Terra, Ricardo, Almeida, Antonia de and Ruffing, Margit, eds. (DeGruyter), 99110.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew and Pereboom, Derk (2010). “Kant’s Theory of Causation and its Eighteenth-Century Background,” Philosophical Review 119(4), 565–92.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2010). “Real Repugnance and Belief and Things-in-Themselves: A Problem and Kant’s Three Solutions,” in Kant’s Moral Metaphysics, Krueger, James and Lipscomb, Benjamin, eds. (DeGruyter), 177210.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2011). “Real Repugnance and our Ignorance of Things-in-Themselves: A Lockean Problem in Kant and Hegel,” Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus 7, 135–59.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2017). “Kant on Cognition, Givenness, and Ignorance,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55(1), 131–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochius, Leonhard (1769). Untersuchung über die Neigungen (Haude and Spener).Google Scholar
Cohen, Ted (1982). “Beauty as the Symbol of Morality,” in Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics, Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul, eds. (University of Chicago Press), 221–36.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel (1991). “Kant’s Metaphysics of Nature,” in Nature and Scientific Method, Dahlstrom, Daniel, ed. (Catholic University of America Press), 271–90.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. (1992). “The Self as a Center of Narrative Gravity,” in Self and Consciousness: Multiple Perspectives, Kessel, F., Cole, P. and Johnson, D., eds. (Psychology Press), 103115.Google Scholar
Dyck, Corey (2011). “Kant’s Transcendental Deduction and the Ghosts of Descartes and Hume,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19(3), 473–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, Corey (2014). Kant and Rational Psychology. (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Echelbarger, Charles (1975). “Hume’s Tacit Atheism,” Religious Studies 11(1), 1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen (1994). “The Transcendental Deduction and Skepticism,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 32, 359–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ertl, Wolfgang (2002). “Hume’s Antinomy and Kant’s Critical Turn,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10(4), 617–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Euler, Leonhard (2009 [1760]). Letters to a German Princess, in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: Background Source Materials, Watkins, Eric, ed. (Cambridge University Press), 180230.Google Scholar
Foley, Richard (2006). “Unnatural Religion: Indoctrination and Philo’s Reversal in Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion,” Hume Studies 32(1), 83112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, Michael (2008). Kant and Skepticism (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Freitag, Wolfgang and Kraus, Katharina (2020). “An Expressivist Logic for Kant’s ‘I think’,” Noûs (Online).Google Scholar
Freudiger, Jürg (1991). “Zum Problem der Wahrnehmungsurteile in Kants Theoretische Philosophie,” Kant-Studien 82, 414–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael (1985). “Kant’s Theory of Geometry,” The Philosophical Review 94, 455506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael (1992). Kant and the Exact Sciences (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael (2012a). “Kant on geometry and spatial intuition,” Synthese 186(1), 253–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael (2012b). “The Prolegomena and Natural Science,” in Kants Prolegomena: Ein Kooperativer Kommentar, Lyre, Holger and Schliemann, Oliver, eds. (Klostermann Rotereihe), 299326.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael (2013). Kant’s Construction of Nature (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frierson, Patrick (2014). Kant’s Empirical Psychology (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fugate, Courtney (2014a). “‘With a Philosophical Eye’: The Role of Mathematical Beauty in Kant’s Intellectual Development,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44, 759–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fugate, Courtney (2014b). The Teleology of Reason: A Study of the Structure of Kant’s Critical Philosophy (De Gruyter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Don (2008). “Should Hume have been a Transcendental Idealist?” in Kant and the Early Moderns, Garber, Daniel and Longuenesse, Béatrice, eds. (Princeton University Press), 193208.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don (2012). “What’s True about Hume’s ‘True Religion’?The Journal of Scottish Philosophy 10(2), 199220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Don (2015). Hume (Routledge).Google Scholar
Gaskin, J. C. A. (1983). “Hume’s Attenuated Deism,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 65(2), 160–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gava, Gabriele (2015). “Kant’s Synthetic and Analytic Method in the Critique of Pure Reason and the Distinction between Philosophical and Mathematical Syntheses,” European Journal of Philosophy 23(3), 728–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhaber, Chuck (in press). “How Kant Thought He Could Reach Hume,” in Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress, Serck-Hansen, Camilla and Himmelmann, Beatrix, eds. (de Gruyter).Google Scholar
Grier, Michelle (2001). Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grüne, Stefanie (2016). “Allais on Intuitions and the Objective Reality of the Categories,” European Journal of Philosophy 24, 241–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grüne, Stefanie (2017). “Givenness, Objective Reality, and A Priori Intuitions,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55(1), 113–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1987). Kant and the Claims of Knowledge (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2008). Knowledge, Reason, and Taste: Kant’s Response to Hume (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2012). “The Prolegomena and the Critique of Pure Reason,” in Kants Prolegomena: Ein Kooperativer Kommentar, Lyre, Holger and Schliemann, Oliver, eds. (Klostermann Rotereihe), 277–98.Google Scholar
Haag, Johannes (2012). “Die Prüfung der kritischen Philosophie,” in Kants Prolegomena: Ein Kooperativer Kommentar, Lyre, Holger and Schliemann, Oliver, eds. (Klostermann Rotereihe), 256–75.Google Scholar
Hamann, Johann Georg (1951). “Dialogen die natürliche Religion betreffend von David Hume,” in Sämtliche Werke, Bd. III, Nadler, Josef, ed. (Verlag Herder).Google Scholar
Hamann, Johann Georg (1952). Samtliche Werke, Historisch-kritische Ausgabe, Bd. IV, Nadler, Josef, ed. (Verlag Herder).Google Scholar
Hamann, Johann Georg (2007). Writings on Philosophy and Language, Kenneth Haynes, trans. (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Harris, James (2015). Hume: An Intellectual Biography (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, Gary (2001). “The Prolegomena and the Critiques of Pure Reason,” in Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung, Horstmann, R. P., Gerhardt, V. and Schumacher, R., eds. (De Gruyter), 185208.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary (2002). “Translator’s Introduction,” in Theoretical Philosophy after 1781, Allison, Henry and Heath, Peter, eds. (Cambridge University Press), 3147.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary (2003). “What Were Kant’s Aims in the Deduction?Philosophical Topics 31, 165–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heis, Jeremy (2014). “Kant on Real Definitions in Geometry,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44(5–6), 605–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, Desmond (2009). “How to Know Unknowable Things in Themselves,” Nous 43(1), 4963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, Desmond (2010). “Kant’s Copernican Turn and the Rationalist Tradition,” in The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, Guyer, Paul ed. (Cambridge University Press), 2140.Google Scholar
Holden, Thomas (2004). The Architecture of Matter: Galileo to Kant (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horace, (1926). Satires, Epistles, and Ars Poetica, Latin, with an English translation by H. Rushton Fairclough (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Horace, (2001). The Epistles of Horace: Bilingual Edition, David Ferry, trans. (Farrar, Straus and Giroux).Google Scholar
Hume, David (1956 [1757]). The Natural History of Religion, Root, H. E., ed. (Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Hume, David (2000 [1739/1740]). A Treatise of Human Nature, Norton, David and Norton, Mary J., eds. (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hume, David (2007a [1748]). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Beauchamp, Tom, ed. (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Hume, David (2007b [1779]). Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and Other Writings, Coleman, Dorothy, ed. (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Jauernig, Anja (2008). “Kant’s Critique of the Leibnizian Philosophy: Contra the Leibnizians, but Pro Leibniz,” in Kant and the Early Moderns, Garber, Daniel and Longuenesse, Beatrice, eds. (Princeton University Press), 4163.Google Scholar
Kain, Patrick (2010). “Practical Cognition, Intuition, and the Fact of Reason,” in Kant’s Moral Metaphysics, Lipscomb, Benjamin and Krueger, James, eds. (DeGruyter), 211–30.Google Scholar
Kemp Smith, Norman (1948). “Introduction,” in Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, 2nd ed. (Social Sciences Publishers), 175.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Patricia (1990). Kant’s Transcendental Psychology (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Klein, Lawrence E. (1994). Shaftesbury and the Culture of Politeness: Moral Discourse and Cultural Politics in Early Eighteenth-century England (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline (1998). “The Conative Character of Reason in Kant’s Philosophy,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 36(1), 7797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline (2018a). “The Principle of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Philosophy: Its Rise and Fall,” in Kant on Persons and Agency, Watkins, Eric, ed. (Cambridge University Press), 6179.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline (2018b). “Moral Autonomy as Political Analogy: Self-Legislation in Kant’s Groundwork and the Feyerabend Lectures on Natural Law (1784),” in The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Philosophy, Bacin, Stefano and Sensen, Oliver, eds. (Cambridge University Press), 158–75.Google Scholar
Kotzin, Rhoda and Baumgärtner, Jörg (1990). “Sensations and Judgments of Perception,” Kant-Studien 81(4), 401–12.Google Scholar
Kramer, Conrad (1985). Nicht-reine synthetische urteile apriori (Heidelberg Verlag).Google Scholar
Kraus, Katharina (2019). “The Parity and Disparity between Inner and Outer Experience in Kant,” Kantian Review 24(2), 171–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, Katharina (2020). Kant on Self-Knowledge and Self-Formation. (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreimendahl, L. (1990). Kant – Der Durchbruch von 1769 (Jürgen Dinter Verlag).Google Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred (1983). “Kant’s Conception of ‘Hume’s Problem’,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 21, 175–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred (1987). Scottish Common Sense in Germany, 1768–1800: A Contribution to the History of Critical Philosophy (McGill-Queen’s University Press).Google Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred (1989). “Hume and Tetens,” Hume Studies 15, 365–75.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred (2001). Kant: A Biography (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred (2005). “The Reception of Hume in Germany,” in The Reception of David Hume in Europe, Jones, Peter, ed. (Bloomsbury), 98138.Google Scholar
Landy, David (2015). Kant’s Inferentialism: The Case Against Hume (Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langton, Rae (1998). Kantian Humility (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Laywine, Allison (1993). Kant’s Early Metaphysics and the Origins of the Critical Philosophy (Ridgeview Publishing Company).Google Scholar
Laywine, Allison (2003). “Kant on Sensibility and Understanding in the 1770s,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33, 443–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laywine, Allison (2014). “Kant on Conic Sections,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44, 719–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Jessica (2017). “Kant’s Material Condition of Real Possibility,” in The Actual and the Possible: Modality and Metaphysics in Modern Philosophy, Sinclair, Mark, ed. (Oxford University Press), 94116.Google Scholar
Levey, Samuel (1998). “Leibniz on Mathematics and the Actually Infinite Division of Matter,” The Philosophical Review 107(1), 4996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John (1975 [1690]). An Essay concerning Human Understanding, Nidditch, Peter H., ed. (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Logan, Beryl (1998). “Hume and Kant on Knowing the Deity,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43(3), 133–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice (1998). Kant and the Capacity to Judge (Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löwisch, Dieter-Jürgen (1965). “Kants Kritik der Reinen Vernunft und Humes Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion,” Kant-Studien 56(2), 170207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu-Adler, Huaping (2018). Kant and the Science of Logic: A Historical and Philosophical Reconstruction (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyre, Holger and Schliemann, Oliver, eds. (2012). Kants Prolegomena: Ein Kooperativer Kommentar (Klostermann Rotereihe).Google Scholar
Lyre, Holger (2012). “Inkongruente Gegenstücke und Idealismus-Vorwurf,” in Kants Prolegomena: Ein Kooperativer Kommentar, Lyre, Holger and Schliemann, Oliver, eds. (Klostermann Rotereihe), 85102.Google Scholar
Maly, Sebastian (2012). Kant über die symbolische Erkenntnis Gottes, in Kantstudien-Ergänzungshefte 165 (De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Marshall, Colin (2014). “Does Kant Demand Explanations for All Synthetic A Priori Claims?Journal of the History of Philosophy 52(3), 549–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matherne, Samantha (2015). “Images and Kant’s Theory of Perception,” Ergo 2(29), 737–77.Google Scholar
Meier, Georg Friedrich (1902 [1752]). Auszug aus der Vernunftlehre, in Akademie Ausgabe: Kant’s gesammelte Schriften (De Gruyter), 1872.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses (2011 [1785]). Morning Hours: Lectures on God’s Existence, Daniel Dahlstrom and Corey Dyck, trans. (Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mensch, Jennifer (2013). Kant’s Organicism: Epigenesis and the Development of Critical Philosophy (Chicago University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, Melissa (2006). “Science and the Synthetic Method of the Critique of Pure Reason,” Review of Metaphysics 59(3), 517–39.Google Scholar
Merritt, Melissa (2007). “Analysis in the Critique of Pure Reason,” Kantian Review 12, 6088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, Melissa (2018). Kant on Reflection and Virtue (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messina, James (2018). “Looking for Laws in all the Wrong Spaces: Kant on Laws, the Understanding, and Space,” European Journal of Philosophy 26(1), 589613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messina, James (manuscript). “The Role of Space in the Grounding of Laws in the Metaphysical Foundations.”Google Scholar
Mohr, Georg (2012). “Urteilstheoretische Vorklärungen zum Metaphysikbegriff,” in Kants Prolegomena: Ein Kooperativer Kommentar, Lyre, Holger and Schliemann, Oliver, eds. (Klostermann Rotereihe), 3160.Google Scholar
Moore, A. W. (2011). The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics: Making Sense of Things (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munzel, Felicitas (1995). “‘The Beautiful Is the Symbol of the Morally-Good’: Kant’s Philosophical Basis of Proof for the Idea of the Morally-Good,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 33, 301–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassar, Dalia (2015). “Analogy, Natural History and the Philosophy of Nature: Kant, Herder and the Problem of Empirical Science,” Journal of the Philosophy of History 9, 240–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neiman, Susan (2004). “Meaning and Metaphysics,” in Teaching New Histories of Philosophy, Schneewind, J. B., ed. (Princeton University Center for Human Values), 2950.Google Scholar
Nelson, John (1988). “The Role of Part XII in Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion,” Hume Studies 14(2), 347–71.Google Scholar
Nicolai, Friedrich, Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim, Mendelssohn, Moses, Abbt, Thomas, Resewitz, Friedrich Gabriel, Grillo, Friedrich (1759). Briefe, die Neueste Litteratur betreffend, Bd. 1 (Friedrich Nicolai).Google Scholar
O’Shea, James (2018). “On Sellars’ Exam Question Trilemma: Are Kant’s Premises Analytic, or Synthetic A Priori, or A Posteriori?British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27(2), 402–21.Google Scholar
Oswald, James (1768 [1766]). An Appeal to Common Sense in behalf of Religion, 2nd ed. (J. Hughes).Google Scholar
Ovid, (2013). The Metamorphoses, Allen Mandelbaum, trans. (Knopf).Google Scholar
Owen, David (1999). Hume’s Reason (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Pakaluk, Michael (2002). “A Defence of Scottish Common Sense,” The Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209), 564–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Charles (1992). “The Transcendental Aesthetic,” in The Cambridge Companion to Kant, Guyer, Paul, ed. (Cambridge University Press), 62100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereboom, Derk (2018). “Kant’s Transcendental Arguments,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Online).Google Scholar
Pillow, Kirk (2000). Sublime Understanding: Aesthetic Reflection in Kant and Hegel (MIT Press).Google Scholar
Plaass, Peter (1965). Kants Theorie der Naturwissenschaft: Eine Untersuchung zur Vorrede von Kants Metaphysichen Anfgangsgründen der Naturwissenschaft (Vandenhoek & Ruprecht).Google Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin (2001). “Einleitung,” in Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik, die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können, Pollok, Konstantin, ed. (Felix Meiner Verlag), ixxvi.Google Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin (2012). “Wie sind Erfahrungsurteile möglich?” in Kants Prolegomena: Ein Kooperativer Kommentar, Lyre, Holger and Schliemann, Oliver, eds. (Klostermann Rotereihe), 103–25.Google Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin (2017). Kant’s Theory of Normativity: Exploring the Space of Reason (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prauss, Gerold (1971). Erscheinung bei Kant (De Gruyter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qu, Hsueh (manuscript). “Answering Hume’s Problem of Induction: Kant and the Synthetic A Priori.”Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas (1997 [1785]). An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense, 4th ed., Brookes, Derek R., ed. (Pennsylvania State University Press).Google Scholar
Rosefeldt, Tobias (2000). Das logische Ich (PHILO).Google Scholar
Rosefeldt, Tobias (2016). “Subjects of Kant’s First Paralogism,” in Kant and the Philosophy of Mind: New Essays on Consciousness, Judgement, and the Self, Gomes, Anil and Stephenson, Andrew, eds. (Oxford University Press), 221–44.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Jay (2005). Accessing Kant (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassen, Brigitte, ed. (2000). Kant’s Early Critics: The Empiricist Critique of the Theoretical Philosophy (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Schafer, Karl (2009). “Review of Allison’s Custom and Reason in Hume,” in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (Online).Google Scholar
Schafer, Karl (2014). “Curious Virtues in Hume’s Epistemology,” Philosophers’ Imprint 14, 120.Google Scholar
Schafer, Karl (2015). “Hume and Practical Reason: Against the Normative Authority of Reason,” in The Oxford Handbook of David Hume, Russell, Paul, ed. (Oxford University Press), 356–79.Google Scholar
Schafer, Karl (2019a). “The Artificial Virtues of Thought: Correctness and Cognition in Hume,” Philosophers’ Imprint 19(7), 120.Google Scholar
Schafer, Karl (2019b). “Kant: Constitutivism as Capacities-First Philosophy,” Philosophical Explorations 22(2), 177–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, Karl (2019c). “Kant’s Conception of Cognition and our Knowledge of Things-in-Themselves,” in The Sensible and Intelligible Worlds, Stang, Nick and Schafer, Karl, eds. (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Schafer, Karl (in press). “Practical Cognition and Knowledge of Things-in-Themselves,” in Kantian Freedom, Tiffany, Evan and Heide, Dai, eds. (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Schafer, Karl (forthcoming). “Transcendental Philosophy as Capacities-First Philosophy,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.Google Scholar
Schönfeld, Martin (2000). The Philosophy of the Young Kant (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulting, Denis, ed. (2016). Kantian Nonconceptualism (Palgrave MacMillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid (2002). “The Role of the Imagination in Kant’s Theory of Experience,” in Kant’s Transcendental Metaphysics, Sicha, Jeffry, ed. (Ridgeview Press), 492505.Google Scholar
Sethi, Janum (2020). “‘For Me in My Present State’: Kant on Judgments of Perception and Mere Subjective Validity,” Journal of Modern Philosophy 2(1), 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shabel, Lisa (1998). “Kant on the ‘Symbolic Construction’ of Mathematical Concepts,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 29, 589621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shabel, Lisa (2012). “Zu Kants Frage ‘Wie ist reine Mathematik möglich?’” in Kants Prolegomena: Ein Kooperativer Kommentar, Lyre, Holger and Schliemann, Oliver, eds. (Klostermann Rotereihe), 6184.Google Scholar
Shaftesbury, Anthony Cooper, Ashley, Third Earl of (1999 [1714]). Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times, 2nd ed., Klein, Lawrence, ed. (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Smit, Houston (2000). “Kant on Marks and the Immediacy of Intuition,” Philosophical Review 109 (2), 235–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smit, Houston (2009). “Kant on apriority and spontaneity of cognition,” in Metaphysics and the Good, Jorgensen, Larry and Newlands, Sam, eds. (Oxford University Press), 188251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smit, Houston (2010). “Apriority, Reason, and Induction in Hume,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 48(3), 313–43.Google Scholar
Sommerlatte, Curtis (2016). “Empirical Cognition in the Transcendental Deduction: Kant’s Starting Point and his Humean Problem,” Kantian Review 21(3), 437–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stang, Nicholas (2016a). “Transcendental Idealism,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Online).Google Scholar
Stang, Nicholas (2016b). Kant’s Modal Metaphysics (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stang, Nicholas (2019). “A Guide to Ground in Kant’s Lectures on Metaphysics,” in Kant’s Lectures on Metaphysics: A Critical Guide, Fugate, Courtney, ed. (Cambridge University Press), 74101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stang, Nicholas (in press). “Bodies, Matter, Monads and Things in Themselves,” in Leibniz and Kant, Look, Brandon, ed. (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Stern, Robert, ed. (1999). Transcendental Arguments (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Stern, Robert (2006). “Metaphysical Dogmatism, Humean Skepticism, Kantian Criticism,” Kantian Review 11, 101–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Robert, (2019). “Transcendental Arguments,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Online).Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter (1959). Individuals (Methuen).Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter (1966). The Bounds of Sense (Methuen).Google Scholar
Stroud, Barry (1968). “Transcendental Arguments,” Journal of Philosophy 65, 241–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, Barry (1999). “The goal of transcendental arguments,” in Transcendental Arguments, Stern, Robert, ed. (Oxford University Press), 203–23.Google Scholar
Szczekalla, Michael (1998). “Philo’s Feigned Fideism in Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 80(1), 7587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetens, Johann Nicolas (1913 [1777]). Philosophische Versuche über die menschliche Natur und ihre Entwickelung, Vol. 1 (Reuther & Reichard).Google Scholar
Thiel, Udo (2011). The Early Modern Subject: Self-Consciousness and Personal Identity from Descartes to Hume (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thielke, Peter (2003). “Hume, Kant, and the Sea of Illusion,” Hume Studies 29(1), 6388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thielke, Peter (2015). “Turnabout is Fair Play: A New Humean Response in the Old Debate with Kant,” Hume Studies 41(2), 263–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolley, Clinton (2017). “Kant on the Place of Cognition in the Progression of Our Representations,” Synthese 197, 130.Google Scholar
Turbayne, Colin (1955). ‘Kant’s Refutation of Dogmatic Idealism,’ Philosophical Quarterly 5, 225–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaihinger, Hans (1911). Philosophie des als-ob (Meiner Verlag).Google Scholar
Van Cleve, James (1995). ‘Putman, Kant, and Secondary Qualities,’ Philosophical Papers 24(2), 83109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Cleve, James (1999). Problems from Kant (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Venturi, Franco (2017). “Sapere aude!” in Europe des Lumières: Recherches sur le 18ème Siècle, Françoise Braudel, trans. (De Gruyter), 3548.Google Scholar
Warda, Arthur (1922). Kants Bucher (Verlag von Martin Breslauer).Google Scholar
Warren, Daniel (2018). “Kant on Mathematical Force Laws,” in Kant and the Laws of Nature, Massimi, Michela and Breitenbach, Angela, eds. (Cambridge University Press), 171–92.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric (2005). Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric (2006). “On the Necessity and Nature of Simples: Leibniz, Wolff, Baumgarten, and the Pre-Critical Kant,” in Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, Vol. 3, Garber, Dan and Nadler, Steve, eds. (Clarendon Press), 261314.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric, ed. (2009). Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: Background Source Materials (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric (2016). “Kant on Materialism,” British Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (5), 1035–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric and Willaschek, Marcus (2017). “Kant’s Account of Cognition,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55(1), 83112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric (2019). Kant on Laws (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waxman, Wayne (2008). “Kant’s Humean Solution to Hume’s Problem,” in Kant and the Early Moderns, Garber, Daniel and Longuenesse, Beatrice, eds. (Princeton University Press), 172–92.Google Scholar
Westra, Adam (2016). The Typic in Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason (De Gruyter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus (2010). “The Primacy of Pure Practical Reason and the Very Idea of a Postulate,” in Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide, Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens, eds. (Cambridge University Press), 168–98.Google Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus (2018). Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winegar, Reed (2015). “Kant’s Criticisms of Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23(5), 888910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1980). Culture and Value, Wright, G.H. von, Nyman, Heikki and Winch, Peter, eds. (Blackwell).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (2010). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, David Pears, trans. (Routledge).Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (1991). “Kant’s Deism,” in Kant’s Philosophy of Religion Reconsidered, Rossi, Philip and Wreen, Michael, eds. (Indiana University Press), 121.Google Scholar
Wuerth, Julian (2014). Kant on Mind, Action, and Ethics (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Peter Thielke, Pomona College, California
  • Book: Kant's Prolegomena
  • Online publication: 08 October 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677776.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Peter Thielke, Pomona College, California
  • Book: Kant's Prolegomena
  • Online publication: 08 October 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677776.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Peter Thielke, Pomona College, California
  • Book: Kant's Prolegomena
  • Online publication: 08 October 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677776.013
Available formats
×