Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-b2xwp Total loading time: 0.564 Render date: 2022-10-02T03:53:23.813Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": true, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2021

Katalin Makkai
Affiliation:
Bard College, Berlin
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Kant's Critique of Taste
The Feeling of Life
, pp. 196 - 203
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Kant, Immanuel. Kants gesammelte Schriften, Akademie Ausgabe. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1902–.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Kritik der reinen Vernunft, edited by Schmidt, Raymund. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1990.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Kritik der Urteilskraft, edited by Vorländer, Karl. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1990.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Kant, Immanuel. “An Answer to the Question: ‘What Is Enlightenment?’” In Kant: Political Writings, edited by Reiss, Hans. Translated by Nisbet, H. B.. Second, enlarged edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Edited and translated by Louden, Robert B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment, edited by Guyer, Paul. Translated by Guyer, Paul and Matthews, Eric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason. Translated by Gregor, Mary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. The Dohna-Wundlacken Logic. In Lectures on Logic, edited and translated by Michael Young, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Edited and translated by Gregor, Mary and Timmermann, Jens. Revised edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. The Jäsche Logic. In Lectures on Logic, edited and translated by Michael Young, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Anthropology, edited by Wood, Allen W. and Louden, Robert B.. Translated by Clewis, Robert R., Louden, Robert B., Munzel, G. Felicitas, and Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. Edited and translated by Hatfield, Gary. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1771, translated by Walford, David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “What Is Orientation in Thinking?” In Kant: Political Writings, edited by Reiss, Hans. Translated by Nisbet, H. B.. Second, enlarged edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Analytic of the Beautiful from the Critique of Judgment. Translated by Cerf, Walter. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1963.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Translated by Dowdell, Victor Lyle, revised and edited by Rudnick, Hans H.. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique de la faculté de juger. Translated by Philonenko, A.. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1968.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique de la faculté de juger. Translated by Renaut, Alain. Paris: Flammarion, 2000.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Translated by Bernard, J. H.. Second edition, revised. London: Macmillan, 1914.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. The Critique of Judgment. Translated by Meredith, James Creed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. The Critique of Judgment. Translated by Meredith, James Creed, revised and edited by Walker, Nicholas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment Including the First Introduction. Translated by Pluhar, Werner S.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Smith, Norman Kemp. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Abrams, M. H.Art-as-Such: The Sociology of Modern Aesthetics.” In Doing Things with Texts: Essays in Criticism and Critical Theory, edited by Fischer, Michael. New York: W. W. Norton, 1991.Google Scholar
Abrams, M. H.Kant and the Theology of Art,” Notre Dame English Journal 13, no. 3 (1981).Google Scholar
Adelung, Johann Christoph. Grammatisch-kritisches Wörterbuch der hochdeutschen Mundart. Vienna: Bauer, 1811. www.digitale-sammlungen.de.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry. Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry. “Pleasure and Harmony in Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Critique of the Causal Reading.” In Kants Ästhetik/Kant’s Aesthetics/L’esthétique de Kant, edited by Parret, Herman. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1998.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. “How to Save Kant’s Deduction of Taste as Objective.” In Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. “New Views on Kant’s Judgment of Taste.” In Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. “Taste, Conceptuality, and Objectivity.” In Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. “The Crisis in Culture: Its Social and Political Significance.” In Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Viking Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. Revised and enlarged edition. New York: Viking Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy, edited by Beiner, Ronald. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words, edited by Urmson, J. O. and Sbisà, Marina. Second edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L.Other Minds.” In Philosophical Papers, edited by Urmson, J. O. and Warnock, G. J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, David. “The Art of Judgement,Mind 96 (1987).Google Scholar
Bernstein, Jay. “Aesthetics, Modernism, Literature: Cavell’s Transformations of Philosophy.” In Stanley Cavell, edited by Eldridge, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Jay. The Fate of Art: Aesthetic Alienation from Kant to Derrida and Adorno. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon. Essays in Quasi-Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon. Spreading the Word: Groundings in the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. “Aesthetic Problems of Modern Philosophy.” In Must We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays. Updated edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. “The Argument of the Ordinary: Scenes of Instruction in Wittgenstein and in Kripke.” In Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome: The Constitution of Emersonian Perfectionism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. “The Avoidance of Love.” In Must We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays. Updated edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. “Music Discomposed.” In Must We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays. Updated edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. Philosophy the Day after Tomorrow. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. Pursuits of Happiness: The Hollywood Comedy of Remarriage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Cervantes, Miguel de. Don Quixote. Translated by Grossman, Edith. Vintage: London, 2005.Google Scholar
Chaouli, Michel. Thinking with Kant’s Critique of Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costello, Diarmuid. “Greenberg’s Kant and the Fate of Aesthetics in Contemporary Art Theory,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65, no. 2 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costelloe, Timothy M.Hume’s Aesthetics: The Literature and Directions for Research,” Hume Studies 30, no. 1 (2004).Google Scholar
Crawford, Donald W. Kant’s Aesthetic Theory. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Crowther, Paul. “The Significance of Kant’s Pure Aesthetic Judgment,” British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel. “The Critique of Pure Reason and Continental Philosophy: Heidegger’s Interpretation of Transcendental Imagination.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, edited by Guyer, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur. “The Future of Aesthetics.” In Rediscovering Aesthetics: Transdisciplinary Voices from Art History, Philosophy, and Art Practice, edited by Halsall, Francis, Jansen, Julia, and O’Connor, Tony. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur. What Art Is. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. The Truth in Painting. Translated by Bennington, Geoff and McLeod, Ian. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L., and Dreyfus, Stuart E.. “What Is Moral Maturity? Towards a Phenomenology of Ethical Expertise.” In Revisioning Philosophy, edited by Ogilvy, James. Albany: SUNY Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. K.The Unity of Kant’s ‘Critique of Aesthetic Judgement’,” British Journal of Aesthetics 8 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, James. Introduction to Beyond the Aesthetic and the Anti-Aesthetic, edited by Elkins, James and Montgomery, Harper. University Park: Pennsylvania University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Fleischacker, Samuel. A Third Concept of Liberty: Judgment and Freedom in Kant and Adam Smith. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, Juliet. “The Fact of Judgment: The Kantian Response to the Humean Condition.” In From Kant to Davidson: Philosophy and the Idea of the Transcendental, edited by Malpas, Jeff. London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Floyd, Juliet. “Heautonomy: Kant on Reflective Judgment and Systematicity.” In Kants Ästhetik/Kant’s Aesthetics/L’esthétique de Kant, edited by Parret, Herman. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1998.Google Scholar
Foot, Philippa. “Morality and Art.” In Moral Dilemmas. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. Necessity, Volition, and Love. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Fried, Michael. “An Introduction to My Art Criticism.” In Art and Objecthood: Essays and Reviews. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Fried, Michael. “Three American Painters.” In Art and Objecthood: Essays and Reviews. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Gardner, Sebastian. “Kant’s Third Critique: The Project of Unification,” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 78 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasché, Rodolphe. The Idea of Form: Rethinking Kant’s Aesthetics. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “Kant on the Subjectivity of Taste.” In Kants Ästhetik/Kant’s Aesthetics/L’esthétique de Kant, edited by Parret, Herman. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1998. Reprinted in Ginsborg, The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgement.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “Kant’s Aesthetics and Teleology.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. Fall 2014 edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/kant-aesthetics/.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “Lawfulness without a Law: Kant on the Free Play of Imagination and Understanding,” Philosophical Topics 25, no. 1 (1997). Reprinted in Ginsborg, The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgement.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “On the Key to Kant’s Critique of Taste,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 72 (1991). Reprinted in Ginsborg, The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgement.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “The Pleasure of Judgement: Kant and the Possibility of Taste.” In The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgement.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “Reflective Judgment and Taste,” Noûs 24 (1990). Reprinted in Ginsborg, The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgement.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. The Role of Taste in Kant’s Theory of Cognition. New York: Garland, 1990.Google Scholar
Gorodeisky, Keren. “Schematizing without a Concept? Imagine that!,Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics 2 (2010).Google Scholar
Gorodeisky, Keren and Marcus, Eric. “Aesthetic Rationality,” Journal of Philosophy 115, no. 3 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gracyk, Theodore. “Hume’s Aesthetics.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. Summer 2016 edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/hume-aesthetics/.Google Scholar
Grimm, Jacob and Wilhelm, Grimm. Deutsches Wörterbuch. Leipzig: S. Hirzel, 1854–1961. www.woerterbuchnetz.de/DWB.Google Scholar
Groves, Rebecca M. “On Performance and the Dramaturgy of Caring.” In Inter Views in Performance Philosophy: Crossings and Conversations, edited by Street, Anna, Alliot, Julien, and Pauker, Magnolia. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “The Harmony of the Faculties Revisited.” In Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy, edited by Kukla, Rebecca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Taste. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “The Origins of Modern Aesthetics: 1711–1735.” In Values of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, Robert. “Kant’s Theory of Judgment.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. Winter 2018 edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/kant-judgment/.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Nietzsche I. Gesamtausgabe, division I, volume 6.1. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1996.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Nietzsche: Volumes One and Two. Translated by Krell, David Farrell. New York: Harper Collins, 1991.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. “The Origin of the Work of Art.” In Poetry, Language, Thought. Translated by Hofstadter, Albert. New York: Harper Collins, 2013.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Emad, Parvis and Maly, Kenneth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. Aesthetic Judgment and the Moral Image of the World. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. “Kant’s Notion of a Deduction and the Methodological Background of the First Critique.” In Kant’s Transcendental Deductions: The Three ‘Critiques’ and the ‘Opus postumum,’ edited by Förster, Eckart. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Robert. “How to Be a Pessimist about Aesthetic Testimony,” Journal of Philosophy 108, no. 3 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Robert. “Kant, Quasi-Realism, and the Autonomy of Aesthetic Judgement,” European Journal of Philosophy 9 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Fiona, Kant’s Aesthetic Epistemology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Hughes, Fiona, Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgement. London: Continuum, 2010.Google Scholar
Hughes, Fiona, “On Aesthetic Judgment and Our Relation to Nature: Kant’s Concept of Purposiveness,” Inquiry 49 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. “Of the Standard of Taste.” In Essays Moral, Political, and Literary, edited by Miller, Eugene F.. Revised edition. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1985.Google Scholar
Isenberg, Arnold. “Critical Communication.” In Aesthetics and the Theory of Criticism: Selected Essays of Arnold Isenberg, edited by Callaghan, W., Cauman, Leigh, Hempel, Carl, et al. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Janaway, Christopher. Images of Excellence: Plato’s Critique of the Arts. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Kalar, Brent. The Demands of Taste in Kant’s Aesthetics. New York: Continuum, 2006.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. The Sources of Normativity, edited by O’Neill, Onora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul A. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Kukla, Rebecca. “Placing the Aesthetic in Kant’s Critical Epistemology,” Introduction to Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy, edited by Kukla, Rebecca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulenkampff, Jens. Kants Logik des ästhetischen Urteils. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1978.Google Scholar
Kulenkampff, Jens. “The Objectivity of Taste: Hume and Kant,” Noûs 24, no. 1 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, Margaret. “Moral Generalities Revisited.” In Moral Particularism, edited by Hooker, B. and Little, M.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Wolfe, Charles T.. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977.Google Scholar
Makkai, Katalin. “Kant on Recognizing Beauty,” European Journal of Philosophy 18, no. 3 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf. Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Mary. Kant’s Aesthetic. Albany: SUNY Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John. “Aesthetic Value, Objectivity, and the Fabric of the World.” In Mind, Value, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. “Values and Secondary Qualities.” In Mind, Value, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. “Virtue and Reason.” In Mind, Value, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. The World of Perception. Translated by Davis, Oliver. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. J. T. What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, Richard. “Frankfurt on Identification: Ambiguities of Activity in Mental Life.” In Contours of Agency: Essays on Themes from Harry Frankfurt, edited by Buss, Sarah and Overton, Lee. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Mothersill, Mary. Beauty Restored. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Mulhall, Stephen. Stanley Cavell: Philosophy’s Recounting of the Ordinary. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Nehamas, Alexander. Only a Promise of Happiness: The Place of Beauty in a World of Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Noë, Alva. Varieties of Presence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacocke, Christopher, “Nonconceptual Content Defended,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57, no. 2 (1998).Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert. “The Significance of Taste: Kant, Aesthetic and Reflective Judgment,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, . Symposium. Translated by Joyce, Michael. In The Collected Dialogues of Plato, edited by Hamilton, Edith and Cairns, Huntington. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Rogerson, Kenneth F. “The Meaning of Universal Validity in Kant’s Aesthetics,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 40 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saarinen, Risto. Recognition and Religion: A Historical and Systematic Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. Being and Nothingness. Translated by Barnes, Hazel E.. New York: Washington Square Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Smith, Zadie. “Some Notes on Attunement.” In Feel Free: Essays. London: Penguin, 2018.Google Scholar
Torsen, Ingvild. “On Heidegger’s Interpretation of Kant’s Aesthetics,” British Journal of Aesthetics 56, no. 1 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasari, Giorgio. The Lives of the Artists. Translated by Bondanella, Julia Conaway and Bondanella, Peter. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Wellberry, David. “Stimmung,” translated by Pohl, Rebecca, New Formations, no. 93 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, Christian. An Introduction to Kant’s Aesthetics: Core Concepts and Problems. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, Robert. Kant on Judgment. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Wiggins, David. “A Sensible Subjectivism.” In Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Winnicott, D. W.Playing: Creative Activity and the Search for the Self.” In Playing and Reality. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Winnicott, W. D.Playing: A Theoretical Statement.” In Playing and Reality. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Winnicott, W. D.Transitional Objects and Transitional Phenomena.” In Playing and Reality. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations, edited by Hacker, P. M. S. and Schulte, Joachim. Translated by Anscombe, G. E. M., Hacker, P. M. S., and Schulte, Joachim. Revised fourth edition. Oxford: Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Remarks, ed. Rhees, Rush. Translated by Hargreaves, Raymond and White, Roger. Oxford: Blackwell, 1964.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. “Art and the Aesthetic: The Religious Dimension.” In The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics, edited by Kivy, Peter. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar
Zerilli, Linda M. G. A Democratic Theory of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel. Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the Critique of Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel. “The Purposiveness of Form,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Katalin Makkai
  • Book: Kant's Critique of Taste
  • Online publication: 07 April 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108596893.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Katalin Makkai
  • Book: Kant's Critique of Taste
  • Online publication: 07 April 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108596893.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Katalin Makkai
  • Book: Kant's Critique of Taste
  • Online publication: 07 April 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108596893.007
Available formats
×