Accetto, M and Zleptnig, S, ‘City Law Firms Charging up to £1,100 an Hour’ The Guardian (5 February 2016).Google Scholar

Accetto, M and Zleptnig, S, ‘Justice Denied?’ The Economist (19 July 2014).Google Scholar

Accetto, M and Zleptnig, S, ‘Order in the Jungle: Economics and the Rule of Law’ The Economist (13 March 2008).Google Scholar

Accetto, M and Zleptnig, S, ‘The Principle of Effectiveness: Rethinking Its Role in Community Law’ (2005) 11 European Public Law 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackerman, B, We the People: Foundations (Belknap Press 1991).Google Scholar

Adams, M, de Waele, H, Meeusen, J and Straetmans, G (eds), Judging Europe’s Judges (Hart Publishing 2013).Google Scholar

Albers, P, ‘Judicial Systems in Europe Compared’ in van Rhee, CH and Uzelac, A (eds), Civil Justice between Efficiency and Quality: From Ius Commune to the CEPEJ (Intersentia 2008).Google Scholar

Albers, P ‘Quality Assessment of Courts and the Judiciary: From Judicial Quality to Court Excellence’ in Uzelac, A and van Rhee, CH (eds), Access to Justice and the Judiciary: Towards New European Standards of Affordability, Quality and Efficiency of Civil Litigation (Intersentia 2009).Google Scholar

Allan, TRS, Law, Liberty, and Justice (Clarendon Press 1993).Google Scholar

Andrews, N, The Modern Civil Process (Mohr Siebeck 2008).Google Scholar

Andrews, N ‘Costs and Conditional Fee Agreements in English Civil Litigation’ in Gottwald, P (ed), Litigation in England and Germany: Legal Professional Services, Key Features and Funding (Gieseking-Verlag 2010).Google Scholar

Andrews, N ‘Fundamental Principles of Civil Procedure: Order out of Chaos’ in Kramer, XE and van Rhee, CH (eds), Civil Litigation in a Globalising World (TMC Asser Press 2012).Google Scholar

Atiyah, PS and Summers, R, Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law (Clarendon Press 1987).Google Scholar

Asser, WDH, Groen, HA, Vranken, JBM and Tzankova, IN, ‘A New Balance: A Summary of the Interim Report Fundamental Review of the Dutch Law of Civil Procedure’ (2003) 8 Zeitschrift fur Zivilprozess International 329.Google Scholar

Bates, E, The Evolution of the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2010).Google Scholar

Bentham, J, The Works of Jeremy Bentham (William Tait 1838–1843).Google Scholar

Bickel, AM, The Least Dangerous Branch (Bobbs Merill 1962).Google Scholar

Bickel, AM The Supreme Court and the Idea of Progress (Yale University Press 1978).Google Scholar

Bingham, T, The Rule of Law (Allen Lane 2010).Google Scholar

Blackburn, R and Polakiewicz, J, Fundamental Rights in Europe (Oxford University Press 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blankenburg, E, ‘Patterns of Legal Culture: The Netherlands Compared to Neighboring Germany’ (1998) 46 American Journal of Comparative Law 1.Google Scholar

Bogdan, M and Maunsbach, U, EU Private International Law: An EC Court Casebook (Europa Law Publishing 2006).Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, A and Ioannidis, M, ‘Systemic Deficiency in the Rule of Law: What It Is, What Has Been Done, What Can Be Done’ (2014) 51 Common Market Law Review 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bork, R, Coercing Virtue: The Worldwide Rule of Judges (American Enterprise Institute 2003).Google Scholar

Botero, JC and others, ‘Judicial Reform’ (2003) 18 World Bank Research Observer 61.Google Scholar

Bowles, R, Law and the Economy (Martin Robertson 1982).Google Scholar

de Búrca, G, ‘National Procedural Rules and Remedies: The Changing Approach of the Court of Justice’ in Lonbay, J and Biondi, A (eds), Remedies for Breach of EC Law (John Wiley 1997) 37–46.Google Scholar

de Búrca, G and Weiler, JHH (eds), The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2011).Google Scholar

Cabrillo, F and Fitzpatrick, S, The Economics of Courts and Litigation (Edward Elgar 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cadiet, L, Normand, J and Amrani-Mekki, S, ‘Civil Justice Reform: French Perspective’ in Zuckerman, AAS (ed), Civil Justice in Crisis (Oxford University Press 1999) 291–329.Google Scholar

Cadiet, L, Normand, J and Amrani-Mekki, S Théorie générale du procès (Presses Universitaires de France 2013).Google Scholar

Calvez, F, ‘Length of Court Proceedings in the Member States of the Council of Europe Based on the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’ (CEPEJ 2006).Google Scholar

Cappelletti, M (ed), Access to Justice (Giuffrè Editore 1978).Google Scholar

Cappelletti, M and Garth, B, ‘Access to Justice and the Welfare State: An Introduction’ in Cappelletti, M (ed), Access to Justice and the Welfare State (European University Institute 1981).Google Scholar

Carothers, T (ed), Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad: In Search of Knowledge (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 2006).Google Scholar

Carothers, T ‘Rule of Law Temptations’ in Heckman, JJ, Nelson, RL and Cabatingan, L (eds), Global Perspectives on the Rule of Law (Routledge 2010).Google Scholar

Cavrois, M-L, Dalle, H and Jean, J-P (eds), La qualité de la justice (La Documentation Française 2002).Google Scholar

Chalmers, D and Tomkins, A, European Union Public Law (Cambridge University Press 2007).Google Scholar

Chase, OG and others, Civil Litigation in Comparative Context (Thomson West 2007).Google Scholar

Chayes, A, ‘The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation’ (1976) 89 Harvard Law Review 1281.Google Scholar

Chiarloni, S, ‘Civil Justice and Its Paradoxes: An Italian Perspective’ in Zuckerman, AAS (ed), Civil Justice in Crisis (Oxford University Press 1999).Google Scholar

Closa, C and Kochenov, D, Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union (Cambridge University Press 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, F, ‘Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach’ (1935) 35 Columbia Law Review 809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooter, RD and Ulen, T, Law and Economics (Pearson 2012).Google Scholar

Costa, P and Zolo, D (eds), The Rule of Law: History, Theory and Criticism (Springer 2007).Google Scholar

Costa, P and Zolo, D ‘The Rule of Law: A Historical Introduction’ in Costa, P and Zolo, D (eds) The Rule of Law: History, Theory and Criticism (Springer 2007) 73–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Couveinhes Matsumoto, F, L’effectivité en droit international (Bruylant 2014).Google Scholar

Coulon, J-M, ‘Réflexions et propositions sur la procédure civile: Rapport au Garde des Sceaux’ (La Documentation Française 1997).Google Scholar

Craig, PP, ‘Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework’ (1997) Public Law 467.Google Scholar

Cross, FB, ‘Law and Economic Growth’ (2002) 80 Texas Law Review 1737.Google Scholar

Cross, R and Harris, JW, Precedent in English Law (Clarendon Press 1991).Google Scholar

Curtin, DM, ‘European Legal Integration: Paradise Lost?’ in Curtin, DM and others (eds), European Integration and Law (Intersentia 2006) 1–54.Google Scholar

Dam, KW, The Law-Growth Nexus: The Rule of Law and Economic Development (The Brookings Institution 2006).Google Scholar

Damaška, MR, The Faces of Justice and State Authority (Yale University Press 1986).Google Scholar

David, R, Le droit francais (LGDJ 1960).Google Scholar

Dawson, JP, The Oracles of the Law (University of Michigan Law School 1968).Google Scholar

Dawson, M, de Witte, B and Muir, E (eds), Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice (Edward Elgar 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dembour, M-B, Who Believes in Human Rights? (Cambridge University Press 2006).Google Scholar

Dicey, AV, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (first published 1885, 10th edn, Liberty Classics 1982).Google Scholar

Dickens, C, Bleak House (Wordsworth Classics 1997).Google Scholar

Dickinson, A and Lein, E (eds), The Brussels I Regulation Recast (Oxford University Press 2015).Google Scholar

Djankov, S and others, ‘Courts’ (2003) 118 The Quarterly Journal of Economics 453.Google Scholar

Douglas-Scott, S, ‘A Tale of Two Courts: Luxembourg, Strasbourg and the Growing European Human Rights Acquis’ (2006) 43 Common Market Law Review 629.Google Scholar

Dreier, H (ed), Grundgesetz Kommentar (Mohr Siebeck 2006), comments on Article 20.Google Scholar

Dubois, E, Schurrer, C and Velicogna, M, ‘The Functioning of Judicial Systems and the Situation of the Economy in the European Union Member States’ (CEPEJ 2013) 616.Google Scholar

Duguit, L, Manuel de droit constitutionnel (first published 1907, Pantheon-Assas 2007).Google Scholar

Duxbury, N, The Nature and Authority of Precedent (Cambridge University Press 2008).Google Scholar

Dworkin, R, ‘Rights as Trumps’ in Waldron, J (ed), Theories of Rights (Oxford University Press 1984) 153–67.Google Scholar

Dworkin, R A Matter of Principle (Harvard University Press 1985).Google Scholar

Dworkin, R Taking Rights Seriously (Harvard University Press 1987).Google Scholar

Dwyer, D (ed), The Civil Procedure Rules Ten Years On (Oxford University Press 2009).Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D (ed), Recrafting the Rule of Law: The Limits of Legal Order (Hart Publishing 1999).Google Scholar

Ehlers, D (ed), European Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (De Gruyter Recht 2007).Google Scholar

Ely, JH, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Harvard University Press 1980).Google Scholar

Esposito, G, Lanau, S and Pompe, S, ‘Judicial System Reform in Italy: A Key to Growth’ IMF Working Paper WP/14/32 (International Monetary Fund 2014).Google Scholar

Eudes, M, La pratique judiciaire interne de la Cour europeenne des droits de l’Homme (Pedone 2005).Google Scholar

Fabri, M, ‘The Italian Maze towards Trials within Reasonable Time’ in The Right to Trial within a Reasonable Time and Short-Term Reform of the European Court of Human Rights (Council of Europe; Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Slovenia and Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Slovenia 2009).Google Scholar

Fabri, M and Langbroek, PM, ‘Delay in Judicial Proceedings: A Preliminary Inquiry into the Relation between the Demands of the Reasonable Time Requirements of Article 6, 1 ECHR and Their Consequences for Judges and Judicial Administration in the Civil, Criminal and Administrative Justice Chains’ (CEPEJ 2003) 20 rev.Google Scholar

Fallon, RH, ‘“The Rule of Law” as a Concept in Constitutional Discourse’ (1997) 97 Columbia Law Review 1, 24.Google Scholar

Faure, MG, ‘Product Liability and Product Safety in a Federal System: Economic Reflections on the Proper Role of Europe’ in Marciano, A and Josselin, J-M (eds), The Economics of Harmonizing European Law (Edward Elgar 2002) 131–77.Google Scholar

Fauvarque-Cosson, B and Kerhuel, A-J, ‘Is Law an Economic Contest? French Reactions to the Doing Business World Bank Reports and the Economic Analysis of the Law’ (2009) 57 American Journal of Comparative Law 811.Google Scholar

Favoreu, L and others, Droit constitutionnel (Dalloz 2016).Google Scholar

Ferrand, F, Cassation française et révision allemande (PUF 1993).Google Scholar

Foster, N and Sule, S, German Legal System and Laws (Oxford University Press 2010).Google Scholar

Francioni, F (ed), Access to Justice as a Human Right (Oxford University Press 2007).Google Scholar

Francioni, F ‘Access to Justice, Denial of Justice and International Investment Law’ (2009) 20 European Journal of International Law 729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuller, LL, The Morality of Law (Yale University Press 1964).Google Scholar

Galanter, M, ‘Why the “Haves” Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change’ (1974) 9 Law and Society Review 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galič, A, ‘A Civil Law Perspective on the Supreme Court and Its Functions’ (The Functions of the Supreme Court: Issues of Process and Administration of Justice conference, Warsaw, 11–14 June 2014).Google Scholar

Giacomelli, S and Menon, C, ‘Firm Size and Judicial Efficiency: Evidence from the Neighbour’s Court’ Working Paper 898 (Banca d’Italia 2013).Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T and Moustafa, T (eds), Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes (Cambridge University Press 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordon, R and Moffatt, R, EU Law in Judicial Review (Oxford University Press 2014).Google Scholar

Gottwald, P, ‘Civil Procedure in Germany after the Reform Act of 2001’ (2004) 23 Civil Justice Quarterly 338–53.Google Scholar

Gozzi, G, ‘Rechtstaat and Individual Rights in German Constitutional Theory’, in Costa, P and Zolo, D (eds) The Rule of Law: History, Theory and Criticism (Springer 2007) 237–59.Google Scholar

Greer, S, The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and Prospects (Cambridge University Press 2006).Google Scholar

Greer, S ‘What’s Wrong with the European Convention on Human Rights?’ (2008) 30 Human Rights Quarterly 680.Google Scholar

Greer, S ‘Towards a Socio-legal Analysis of the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Madsen, MR and Verschragen, R (eds), Making Human Rights Intelligible (Hart Publishing 2013) 149–71.Google Scholar

Guinchard, S, ‘L’émergence d’un droit procédural mondial’ in Larivière, DS and Dalle, H, Notre justice (Robert Lafont 2002) 172–89.Google Scholar

van Gerven, W, ‘Bringing (Private) Laws Closer to Each Other at the European Level’ in Cafaggi, F (ed), The Institutional Framework of European Private Law (Oxford University Press 2006) 37–77.Google Scholar

Hadfield, GK, ‘The Price of Law: How the Market for Lawyers Distorts the Justice System’ (1999–2000) 98 Michigan Law Review 953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hallström, P, ‘Balance or Clash of Legal Orders: Some Notes on Margin of Appreciation’ in Nergelius, J and Kristofferson, E (eds) Human Rights in Contemporary European Law (Hart Publishing 2014) 59–74.Google Scholar

Haltern, U, ‘Integration through Law’ in Wiener, A and Diez, T (eds), European Integration Theory (Oxford University Press 2004) 178–95.Google Scholar

Hansmann, HB and Dammann, J, ‘Globalizing Commercial Litigation’ (2008) 94 Cornell Law Review 1.Google Scholar

Harmsen, R, ‘The European Court of Human Rights as a “Constitutional Court”: Definitional Debates and the Dynamics of Reform’ in Morison, J, McEvoy, K and Anthony, G (eds), Judges, Transition, and Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2007) 33–53.Google Scholar

Hart, HLA, The Concept of Law (2nd edn, Clarendon Press 1994).Google Scholar

Hayek, FA, Road to Serfdom (first published 1944, University of Chicago Press 2007).Google Scholar

Hayek, FA The Constitution of Liberty (University of Chicago Press 1960).Google Scholar

Heckman, JJ, Nelson, RL and Cabatingan, L (eds), Global Perspectives on the Rule of Law (Routledge 2010).Google Scholar

Helfer, LR and Slaughter, A-M, ‘Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication’ (1997) 107 Yale Law Journal 273.Google Scholar

Helfer, LR, ‘Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime’ (2008) 19 European Journal of International Law 125.Google Scholar

Henkin, L, The Age of Rights (Columbia University Press 1990).Google Scholar

Henkin, L ‘Human Rights: Ideology and Aspiration, Reality and Prospect’ in Power, S and Allison, G (eds), Realising Human Rights (St. Martin’s Press 2000) 3–33.Google Scholar

Hesselink, MW, The New European Private Law: Essays on the Future of Private Law in Europe (Kluwer Law International 2002).Google Scholar

Heuschling, L, Etat de droit, Rechtsstaat, Rule of Law (Dalloz 2002).Google Scholar

Hilf, M and Hörmann, S, ‘Effektivität – ein Rechtsprinzip?’ in Dupuy, P-M and others (eds), Völkerrecht als Wertordnung (N.P. Engel Verlag 2006) 913–45.Google Scholar

Hioureas, CG, ‘Behind the Scenes of Protocol No. 14: Politics in Reforming the European Court of Human Rights’ (2006) 24 Berkeley Journal of International Law 718.Google Scholar

Hodges, C, Vogenauer, S and Tulibacka, M, The Costs and Funding of Civil Litigation: A Comparative Perspective (Hart Publishing 2010).Google Scholar

Hodges, C, ‘Competition Enforcement, Regulation and Civil Justice: What Is the Case?’ (2006) 43 Common Market Law Review 1381–407.Google Scholar

Holmes, OW, Jr, The Common Law (Mark De Wolfe Howe ed, Little Brown 1963).Google Scholar

Humphreys, S, Theatre of the Rule of Law (Cambridge University Press 2010).Google Scholar

Jackson, R, ‘Review of Civil Litigation Costs: Final Report’ (The Stationery Office, 2009).Google Scholar

Jacob, JIH, The Fabric of English Civil Justice (The Hamlyn Lectures, Stevens and Sons 1987).Google Scholar

Janis, MW, Kay, RS and Bradley, AW, European Human Rights Law (3rd edn, Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar

Jolowicz, JA, ‘The Role of the Supreme Court at the National and International Level: A General Report’ in Yessiou-Faltsi, P (ed), The Role of the Supreme Courts at the National and International Level (Sakkoulas 1997) 50.Google Scholar

Jones, A and Sufrin, B, EU Competition Law (Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar

Jowell, J, ‘The Rule of Law and Its Underlying Values’ in Jowell, J and Oliver, D (eds), The Changing Constitution (Oxford University Press 2007) 5–24.Google Scholar

Juenger, FK, ‘Some Comments on European Procedural Harmonization’ (1997) 45 American Journal of Comparative Law 931.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, D, Kraay, A and Mastruzzi, M, ‘The Worldwide Governance Indicators Methodology and Analytical Issues’ The World Bank Development Research Group Macroeconomics and Growth Team Policy Research Working Paper 5430 (World Bank 2010) 4.Google Scholar

Kay, RS, ‘The European Human Rights System as a System of Law’ (2000) 6 Columbia Journal of European Law 55, 55–79.Google Scholar

Kelemen, RD, Eurolegalism: The Transformation of Law and Regulation in the European Union (Harvard University Press 2011).Google Scholar

Kelsen, H, Pure Theory of Law (University of California Press 1967).Google Scholar

Kennedy, D, A Critique of Adjudication (Harvard University Press 1997).Google Scholar

Kerameus, KD, ‘Procedural Harmonization in Europe’ (1995) 43 American Journal of Comparative Law 401.Google Scholar

Kleinfeld, R, Advancing the Rule of Law Abroad (The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 2012).Google Scholar

Komárek, J, ‘Reasoning with Previous Decisions: Beyond the Doctrine of Precedent’ (2013) 61 American Journal of Comparative Law 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kötz, H, ‘Civil Justice Systems in Europe and the United States’ (2003) 13 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 61.Google Scholar

Kramer, MH, Objectivity and the Rule of Law (Cambridge University Press 2007).Google Scholar

Kühn, Z, ‘Worlds Apart: Western and Central European Judicial Culture at the Onset of the European Enlargement’ (2004) 52 American Journal of Comparative Law 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kühn, Z The Judiciary in Central and Eastern Europe: Mechanical Jurisprudence in Transformation (Martinus Nijhoff 2011).Google Scholar

Kukovec, D, ‘Hierarchies as Law’ (2014) 21 Columbia Journal of European Law 131.Google Scholar

Kunig, P, Das Rechtstaatsprinzip (Sieber Mock 1986).Google Scholar

La Porta, R, Lopez-de-Silanes, F, Schleifer, A and Vishny, RW, ‘Law and Finance’ (1998) 106 Journal of Political Economy 1151.Google Scholar

Langbein, JH, ‘The German Advantage in Civil Procedure’ (1985) 52 University of Chicago Law Review 823.Google Scholar

Larivière, DS, ‘Overview of the Problems of French Civil Procedure’ (1997) 45 American Journal of Comparative Law 737.Google Scholar

Lautenbach, G, The Concept of the Rule of Law and the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2013).Google Scholar

Lenaerts, K, ‘The Rule of Law and the Coherence of the Judicial System of the European Union’ (2007) 44 Common Market Law Review 1625.Google Scholar

Leroy, Y, ‘La notion d’effectivité du droit’ (2011) 79 Droit et société 715.Google Scholar

le Sueur, A, ‘Panning for Gold: Choosing Cases for Top-Level Courts’ in le Sueur, A (ed), Building the UK’s New Supreme Court (Oxford University Press 2004) 271.Google Scholar

Letsas, G, A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2007).Google Scholar

Letsas, G ‘Strasbourg’s Interpretive Ethic: Lessons for the International Lawyer’ (2010) 21 European Journal of International Law 509.Google Scholar

Lindblom, PH, ‘Harmony of the Legal Spheres’ (1997) 5 European Review of Private Law 11–46.Google Scholar

Locke, J, Second Treatise of Civil Government (first published 1689, Hackett 1980), ch IV, sec 22.Google Scholar

Lowenfeld, AF, International Economic Law (Oxford University Press 2008) 495–591.Google Scholar

Lucy, W, ‘The Rule of Law and Private Law’ in Austin, LM and Klimchuk, D (eds), Private Law and the Rule of Law (Oxford University Press 2014) 41–66.Google Scholar

Magen, A, ‘The Rule of Law and Its Promotion Abroad: Three Problems of Scope’ (2009) 45 Stanford Journal of International Law 51.Google Scholar

Magen, A and Morlino, L, ‘Hybrid Regimes, the Rule of Law, and External Influence on Domestic Change’ in Magen, A and Morlino, L (eds), International Actors, Democratization and the Rule of Law (Routledge 2009) 3–26.Google Scholar

Magendie, J-C, ‘Célérité et qualité de la justice: Rapport au Garde des Sceaux’ (La Documentation Française 2004).Google Scholar

Magendie, J-C‘Célérité et qualité de la justice devant la cour d’appel: Rapport au garde des sceaux’ (La Documentation Française 2008).Google Scholar

Mak, C, ‘Rights and Remedies: Article 47 EUCFR and Effective Judicial Protection in European Private Law Matters’ in Micklitz, H-W (ed), Constitutionalization of European Private Law (Oxford University Press 2014) 236–58.Google Scholar

Markesinis, B, ‘Litigation-Mania in England, Germany, and the USA: Are We So Very Different?’ (1990) 49 Cambridge Law Journal 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Malberg, RC, Contribution à la théorie générale de L‘Etat (first published 1920 and 1922, Dalloz 2004) 712–49.Google Scholar

Maxeiner, JR, ‘Some Realism about Legal Certainty in the Globalisation of the Rule of Law’ in Sellers, MNS and Tomaszewski, T (eds), The Rule of Law in Comparative Perspective (Springer 2010).Google Scholar

Miller, DP, ‘The Legal-Economic Analysis of Comparative Civil Procedure’ (1997) 45 American Journal of Comparative Law 905.Google Scholar

Mockle, D (ed), Mondialisation et État de droit (Bruylant 2002).Google Scholar

Möllers, TMJ, ‘The Role of Law in European Integration’ (2000) 48 American Journal of Comparative Law 679.Google Scholar

Mowbray, A, Cases, Materials, and Commentary on the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar

von Munch, I and Kunig, P (eds), Grundgesetz Kommentar (C.H. Beck 2012), Band 1, comments on Article 20.Google Scholar

Murray, PL and Stürner, R, German Civil Justice (Carolina Academic Press 2004).Google Scholar

Nelken, D (ed), Comparing Legal Cultures (Dartmouth 1997).Google Scholar

North, DC, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press 1990).Google Scholar

O’Boyle, M, ‘On Reforming the Operation of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2008) 1 European Human Rights Law Review 1.Google Scholar

Olson, WK, The Litigation Explosion (Penguin Books, 1991).Google Scholar

Palombella, G, ‘The Rule of Law as an Institutional Ideal’ in Morlino, L and Palombella, G (eds), Rule of Law and Democracy (Brill 2010) 3.Google Scholar

Peers, S, EU Justice and Home Affairs Law (3rd edn, Oxford University Press 2011).Google Scholar

Perrot, R, Institutions judiciaires (Montchrestien 2010).Google Scholar

Perry, AJ, ‘The Relationship between Legal Systems and Economic Development: Integrating Economic and Cultural Approaches’ (2002) 29 Journal of Law and Society 282–307.Google Scholar

Peters, CJ, ‘Foolish Consistency: On Equality, Integrity, and Justice in Stare Decisis’ (1996) 105 Yale Law Journal 2031.Google Scholar

Peysner, J, ‘A Blot on the Landscape’, in Dwyer, D (ed), The Civil Procedure Rules Ten Years On (Oxford University Press 2009) 157–70.Google Scholar

Peysner, J ‘England and Wales’ in Hodges, C, Vogenauer, S and Tulibacka, M (eds), The Costs and Funding of Civil Litigation: A Comparative Perspective (Hart Publishing 2010) 289.Google Scholar

Posner, RA, The Economics of Justice (Harvard University Press 1980).Google Scholar

Posner, RA Economic Analysis of Law (4th edn, Little Brown and Company 1992).Google Scholar

Posner, RA ‘The Cost of Rights: Implications for Central and Eastern Europe and for the United States’ (1996) 32 Tulsa Law Journal 1.Google Scholar

Radbruch, G, Rechtsphilosophie (first published 1932, C.F. Müller 2003).Google Scholar

Rainey, B, Wicks, E and Ovey, C, Jacobs, White & Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2014).Google Scholar

Rasmussen, H, On Law and Policy in the European Court of Justice: A Comparative Study in Judicial Policymaking (Kluwer Academic Publisher 1986).Google Scholar

Rawls, J, A Theory of Justice (revised edn, Belknap Press 1999).Google Scholar

Raz, J, The Authority of Law (Oxford University Press 2009).Google Scholar

Rehman, J, International Human Rights Law (2nd edn, Pearson Education 2010).Google Scholar

Reid, K, A Practitioner’s Guide to the European Convention on Human Rights (Sweet & Maxwell 2011).Google Scholar

Reiling, D, Hammergren, L and di Giovanni, A, ‘Justice Sector Assessments’ (World Bank 2006).Google Scholar

Reimann, M (ed), Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure: A Comparative Study (Springer 2013).Google Scholar

Reimann, M ‘Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure: A Synthesis’ in Reimann, M (ed), Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure (Springer 2013) 25.Google Scholar

Rigobon, R and Rodrik, D, ‘Rule of Law, Democracy, Openness, and Income: Estimating the Interrelationships’ (2005) 13 The Economics of Transition 533.Google Scholar

Robertson, AH and Merrils, JG, Human Rights in the World (Manchester University Press 1996).Google Scholar

van Rhee, CH (ed), The Law’s Delay: Essays on Undue Delay in Civil Litigation (Intersentia 2004).Google Scholar

van Rhee, CH ‘Public Justice: Some Historical Remarks’ in Uzelac, A and van Rhee, CH (eds), Public and Private Justice: Dispute Resolution in Modern Societies (Intersentia 2007) 3–4.Google Scholar

van Rhee, CH Judicial Case Management and Efficiency in Civil Litigation (Intersentia 2008).Google Scholar

van Rhee, CH Within a Reasonable Time: The History of Due and Undue Delay in Civil Litigation (Duncker and Humbold 2010).Google Scholar

van Rhee, CH ‘Civil Justice in Pursuit of Efficiency’ in Uzelac, A (ed), Goals of Civil Justice and Civil Procedure in Contemporary Judicial Systems (Springer 2014) 61–77.Google Scholar

van Rhee, CH and Uzelac, A (eds), Truth and Efficiency in Civil Litigation (Intersentia 2012).Google Scholar

Sadurski, W, ‘Partnering with Strasbourg: Constitutionalisation of the European Court of Human Rights, the Accession of Central and East European States to the Council of Europe, and the Idea of Pilot Judgments’ (2009) 9 Human Rights Law Review 397.Google Scholar

Sajo, A, ‘On Old and New Battles: Obstacles to the Rule of Law in Eastern Europe’ (1995) 22 Journal of Law and Society 97.Google Scholar

Sanchirico, CW (ed), Procedural Law and Economics (Edward Elgar 2012).Google Scholar

Santoro, E, ‘The Rule of Law and the “Liberties of the English”: The Interpretation of Albert Venn Dicey’ in Costa, P and Zolo, D (eds), The Rule of Law: History, Theory and Criticism (Springer 2007) 153–99.Google Scholar

Santos, A, ‘The World Bank’s Uses of “Rule of Law”: Promises in Economic Development’ in Trubek, D and Santos, A (eds), The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal (Cambridge University Press 2006) 253–300.Google Scholar

Šarčević, E, Der Rechtsstaat (Leipziger Juristische Studien 1996).Google Scholar

de S-O-l’E Lasser, M, Judicial Deliberations (Oxford University Press 2009).Google Scholar

Shapiro, I (ed), The Rule of Law (New York University Press 1987).Google Scholar

Shavell, S, Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law (Belknap Press 2004).Google Scholar

Shelton, D, Remedies in International Human Rights Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2005).Google Scholar

Shihata, IFI, The World Bank Legal Papers (Martinus Nijhoff 2000).Google Scholar

Shklar, JN, ‘Political Theory and the Rule of Law’ in Hutchinson, AC and Monahan, P (eds), The Rule of Law: Ideal or Ideology (Carswell 1987) 1–3.Google Scholar

Smits, J, The Making of European Private Law (Intersentia 2002).Google Scholar

Sorabji, J, English Civil Justice after the Woolf and Jackson Reforms: A Critical Analysis (Cambridge University Press 2014).Google Scholar

Stirk, PMR, A History of European Integration since 1914 (Continuum 1996) 162–202.Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, A, The Judicial Construction of Europe (Oxford University Press 2004).Google Scholar

Storskrubb, E and Ziller, J, ‘Access to Justice in European Comparative Law’ in Francioni, F (ed), Access to Justice as a Human Right (Oxford University Press 2007) 177–203.Google Scholar

Summers, RS, Lon L. Fuller (Stanford University Press 1984).Google Scholar

Sunstein, CR, A Constitution of Many Minds (Princeton University Press 2009).Google Scholar

Tamanaha, B, On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory (Cambridge University Press 2004).Google Scholar

Terré, F, Introduction générale au droit (Dalloz 2006).Google Scholar

Tomuschat, C, Human Rights: Between Idealism and Realism (Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar

Trebilcock, MJ and Daniels, RJ, Rule of Law Reform and Development: Charting the Fragile Path of Progress (Edwar Elgar Publishing 2008).Google Scholar

Trebilcock, MJ, Sossin, LM and Duggan, AJ (eds), Middle Income Access to Justice (University of Toronto Press 2012).Google Scholar

Troper, M, La théorie du droit, le droit, l’État (Presses Universitaires de France 2001).Google Scholar

Tuil, M and Visscher, L (eds), New Trends in Financing Civil Litigation in Europe (Edward Elgar 2010).Google Scholar

Tulibacka, M, ‘Europeanisation of Civil Procedures: In Search of a Coherent Approach’ (2009) 46 Common Market Law Review 1527–65.Google Scholar

Tunc, A, ‘La Cour de cassation en crise’ in La jurisprudence (Archives de philosophie du droit, Editions Sirey 1985) 157–67.Google Scholar

Twining, W, Karl Llewellyn and the Realist Movement (Cambridge University Press 2014).Google Scholar

Tyler, TR, ‘Citizen Discontent with Legal Procedures: A Social Science Perspective on Civil Procedure Reform’ (1997) 45 American Journal of Comparative Law 871.Google Scholar

Tzankova, I and Gramatikov, M, ‘A Critical Note on Two EU Principles: Proceduralist View on the Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR)’ in Bronwsford, R and others (eds), The Foundations of European Private Law (Hart Publishing 2011) 423.Google Scholar

Ulen, TS, ‘The Role of Law in Economic Growth and Development’ in Faure, M and Smits, J (eds), Does Law Matter? On Law and Economic Growth (Intersentia 2011) 179–211.Google Scholar

Unger, RM, What Should Legal Analysis Become? (Verso 1996). Upham, F, ‘Mythmaking in the Rule-of-Law Orthodoxy’ in Carothers, T (ed), Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad: In Search of Knowledge (The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 2006) 75–104.Google Scholar

Uzelac, A (ed), Goals of Civil Justice and Civil Procedure in Contemporary Judicial Systems (Springer 2014).Google Scholar

Uzelac, A and van Rhee, CH (eds), Access to Justice and the Judiciary: Towards New European Standards of Affordability, Quality and Efficiency of Civil Litigation (Intersentia 2009).Google Scholar

Uzelac, A, ‘Accelerating Civil Proceedings in Croatia: A History of Attempts to Improve the Efficiency of Civil Litigation’ in van Rhee, CH (ed), The Law’s Delay: Essays on Undue Delay in Civil Litigation (Intersentia 2004).Google Scholar

Uzelac, A ‘The Rule of Law and the Judicial System: Court Delays as a Barrier to Accession’ in Ott, K (ed), Croatian Accession to the European Union (Institut za javne financije 2004) 105–30.Google Scholar

Uzelac, A ‘The Rule of Law and the Croatian Judicial System: Court Delays as a Barrier on the Road to European Accession’ in Frosini, LM (ed), A European Space of Justice (Ravenna 2006) 87–108.Google Scholar

Uzelac, A ‘Public and Private Justice: The Challenges of Rational Assessment of Performance in the Contemporary Justice Systems’ in Uzelac, A and van Rhee, CH (eds), Public and Private Justice (Intersentia 2007) 7–30 (A16).Google Scholar

Uzelac, A ‘Reforming Mediterranean Civil Procedure: Is There a Need for Shock Therapy?’ in van Rhee, CH and Uzelac, A (eds), Civil Justice between Efficiency and Quality: From Ius Commune to the CEPEJ (Intersentia 2008) 71–99.Google Scholar

Uzelac, A ‘Legal Remedies for the Violations of the Right to a Trial within a Reasonable Time in Croatia: In the Quest for the Holy Grail of Effectiveness’ (2010) 35 Revista de Processo 159.Google Scholar

Uzelac, A ‘Survival of the Third Legal Tradition?’ (2010) 49 Supreme Court Law Review 377.Google Scholar

Uzelac, A ‘Efficiency of European Justice Systems: The Strength and Weaknesses of the CEPEJ Evaluations’ (2011) 1 International Journal of Procedural Law 106.Google Scholar

Uzelac, A ‘Harmonised Civil Procedure in a World of Structural Divergences? Lessons Learned from the CEPEJ Evaluation’ in Kramer, XE and van Rhee, CH (eds), Civil Litigation in a Globalising World (TMC Asser Press 2012) 203.Google Scholar

Uzelac, A ‘Goals of Civil Justice and Civil Procedure in the Contemporary World’ in Uzelac, A (ed), Goals of Civil Justice and Civil Procedure in Contemporary Judicial Systems (Springer 2014) 3–31.Google Scholar

Uzelac, A‘Supreme Courts in the 21st Century: Should Organization Follow the Function?’ (The Functions of the Supreme Court: Issues of Process and Administration of Justice conference, Warsaw, 11–14 June 2014).Google Scholar

Varano, V, ‘Civil Procedure Reform in Italy’ (1997) 45 The American Journal of Comparative Law 657.Google Scholar

Waldron, J, ‘The Concept and the Rule of Law’ (2008) 43 Georgia Law Review 1, 59.Google Scholar

Weatherill, S, ‘European Private Law and the Constitutional Dimension’ in Cafaggi, F (ed), The Institutional Framework of European Private Law (Oxford University Press 2006) 79–106.Google Scholar

Weiler, JHH, The Constitution of Europe (Cambridge University Press 1999).Google Scholar

Welcker, KT, Die letzten Gründe von Recht, Staat und Strafe (first published 1813, Scientia 1964).Google Scholar

Wilman, F, Private Enforcement of EU Law before National Courts (Edward Elgar 2015).Google Scholar

Woolf, H, Access to Justice: Final Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Civil Justice System in England and Wales (HMSO 1996).Google Scholar

Woolf, H ‘Civil Justice in the United Kingdom’ (1997) 45 The American Journal of Comparative Law 709.Google Scholar

Woolf, H ‘The Judiciary of England and Wales and the Rule of Law’ (2006) 39 Indiana Law Review 613.Google Scholar

Yaxin, W and Yulin, F, ‘China: Mainland. Efficiency at the Expense of Quality?’ in van Rhee, CH and Yulin, F (eds), Civil Litigation in China and Europe (Springer 2013) 11–37.Google Scholar

Zander, M, ‘The First Wave’ in Cappelletti, M (ed), Access to Justice and the Welfare State (European University Institute 1981) 27.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, R, ‘The “Europeanization” of Private Law within the European Community and the Re-emergence of a European Legal Science’ (1995) 1 Columbia Journal of European Law 63, 104.Google Scholar

Zuckerman, AAS (ed), ‘A Reform of Civil Procedure: Rationing Procedure rather than Access to Justice’ (1995) 22 Journal of Law and Society 155.Google Scholar

Zuckerman, AAS ‘Reform in the Shadow of Lawyers’ Interests’ in Zuckerman, AAS and Cranston, R, Reform of Civil Procedure (Clarendon Press 1995) 61–77.Google Scholar

Zuckerman, AAS‘Lord Woolf’s Access to Justice: Plus ca change’ (1996) Modern Law Review 773.Google Scholar

Zuckerman, AAS Civil Justice in Crisis (Oxford University Press 1999).Google Scholar

Zuckerman, AAS ‘Litigation Management under the CPR: A Poorly-Used Management Infrastructure’, in Dwyer, D (ed), The Civil Procedure Rules Ten Years On (Oxford University Press 2009) 89–106.Google Scholar

American Law Institute/UNIDROIT, ‘Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure’ (2004).Google Scholar

Australian Government, Attorney-General’s Department, ‘A Strategic Framework for Access to Justice in the Federal Civil Justice System: A Guide for Future Action’ (2009).Google Scholar

Bundesgerichtshof, ‘Übersicht über den Geschäftsgang bei den Zivilsenaten des Bundesgerichtshofs im Jahr 2019’.Google Scholar

CEPEJ, ‘A New Objective for Judicial Systems: The Processing of Each Case within an Optimum and Foreseeable Timeframe’ (Framework Programme) CM (2004) 119.Google Scholar

CEPEJ‘Scheme for Evaluating Judicial Systems – Key Judicial Indicators’ (2007).Google Scholar

CEPEJ‘Checklist for Promoting the Quality of Justice and the Courts’ (2008).Google Scholar

CEPEJ‘Access to Justice in Europe’ (2010).Google Scholar

CEPEJ‘Quality Management in Courts and in the Judicial Organisations in 8 Council of Europe Member States’ (2010).Google Scholar

CEPEJ‘Scheme for Evaluating Judicial Systems, 2018–2020 Cycle’ (2020).Google Scholar

Consortium for Court Excellence, ‘International Framework for Court Excellence’ (2013).Google Scholar

Council of Europe, ‘Length of Proceedings in Italy: A Persistent Structural Problem’ (2002) CM/Inf (2002) 47 Addendum.Google Scholar

Council of Europe‘Warsaw Declaration’ (Declaration of the Third Summit of Heads of State and Government of the Council of Europe, Warsaw, 16–17 May 2005).Google Scholar

Council of Europe‘Report of the Group of Wise Persons to the Committee of Ministers’ CM (2006) 203.Google Scholar

Council of Europe‘Interlaken Declaration’ (Declaration of the High Level Conference on the Future of the European Court of Human Rights, Interlaken, Switzerland, 19 February 2010).Google Scholar

Council of Europe‘Brighton Declaration’ (Declaration of the High Level Conference on the Future of the European Court of Human Rights, Brighton, United Kingdom, 18–20 April 2012).Google Scholar

Council of Europe‘Copenhagen Declaration’ (Declaration of the High Level Conference meeting in Copenhagen on 12 and 13 April 2018 at the initiative of the Danish Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe).Google Scholar

Council of Europe‘European Judicial Systems: Efficiency and Quality of Justice: 2018 Edition (2016 Data)’ (2018).Google Scholar

Cour de cassation, ‘Rapport Annuel 2018 de la Cour de cassation’ (2019).Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘Green Paper on Consumer Collective Redress’ (Communication) COM (2008) 794 final.Google Scholar

European Commission‘White Paper on Damages Actions for Breach of the EC Antitrust Rules’ COM (2008) 165.Google Scholar

European Commission‘Support to Justice and the Rule of Law’ (2012).Google Scholar

European Commission‘A New EU Framework to Strengthen the Rule of Law’ (Communication) COM (2014) 158 final/2 (corrigendum).Google Scholar

European Commission‘On Progress in Romania under the Co-operation and Verification Mechanism’ (Communication) COM (2014) 37 final.Google Scholar

European Commission‘The EU Justice Agenda for 2020: Strengthening Trust, Mobility and Growth within the Union’ (Communication) COM (2014) 144.Google Scholar

European Commission‘Further Strengthening the Rule of Law within the Union’ (Communication) COM (2019) 163 final.Google Scholar

European Commission‘The 2019 EU Justice Scoreboard’ (Communication) COM (2019) 198.Google Scholar

European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), ‘Report on the Effectiveness of National Remedies in Respect of Excessive Length of Proceedings’ (2007) CDL-AD (2006) 036 rev.Google Scholar

European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission)‘Report on the Rule of Law’, document CDL-AD (2011) 003 rev.Google Scholar

European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission)‘Compilation of Venice Commission Opinions and Reports Concerning Courts and Judges’ (2015) CDL-PI (2015) 001.Google Scholar

European Council, ‘Presidency Conclusions’ (Tampere, Finland, 15–16 October 1999).Google Scholar

European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission)‘The Hague Programme: Strengthening Freedom, Security and Justice in the European Union’ [2005] OJ C 53/1.Google Scholar

European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission)‘The Stockholm Programme: An Open and Secure Europe Serving and Protecting Citizens’ [2010] OJ C 115/1.Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights, ‘Annual Report 2003’ (Council of Europe Publishing 2004).Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights‘Memorandum of the President of the European Court of Human Rights to the States with a View to Preparing the Interlaken Conference’ (2009).Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights‘The ECHR in Facts and Figures 2011’ (2012).Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights‘The ECHR in Facts and Figures 2019’ (2020).Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights‘Analysis of Statistics 2015’ (2015).Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights‘Annual Report 2015’ (2015).Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights‘Overview 1959–2019’ (2020).Google Scholar

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, ‘Access to Justice in Europe: An Overview of Challenges and Opportunities’ (2011).Google Scholar

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights‘Access to Data Protection Remedies in EU Member States’ (2014).Google Scholar

Eurostat, ‘Quality of Life’ (2015 edn).Google Scholar

Hague Institute for the Internationalisation of Law, ‘Rule of Law Inventory Report, Academic Part’ (Discussion Paper for the High Level Expert Meeting on the Rule of Law of 20 April 2007).Google Scholar

Milieu Ltd, ‘Comparative Study on Access to Justice in Gender Equality and Anti-Discrimination Law’, Final Report prepared for the European Commission (2011).Google Scholar

National Center for State Courts, ‘Why Measure Performance? CourTools Performance Measures’ (2005).Google Scholar

Netherlands Council for the Judiciary, ‘Quality of the Judicial System in the Netherlands’ (2008).Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, ‘Judicial Performance and Its Determinants: A Cross-Country Perspective’ OECD Economic Policy Papers No. 5 (2013).Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development‘What Makes Civil Justice Effective?’ OECD Economics Department Policy Notes No. 18 (2013).Google Scholar

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, ‘Document of the Copenhagen Meeting of the Conference on the Human Dimension of the CSCE’ (1990).Google Scholar

Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, ‘The Rule of Law Concept: Significance in Development Co-operation’ (1998).Google Scholar

United Kingdom Department for International Development, ‘Policy Approach to Rule of Law’ (2014).Google Scholar

United Kingdom Ministry of Justice, ‘Reform of Legal Aid in England and Wales: The Government Response’ (2011).Google Scholar

United Kingdom Supreme Court, ‘The Supreme Court Annual Report and Accounts 2018–2019’ (2019).Google Scholar

United Nations, General Assembly Resolution, ‘United Nations Millennium Declaration’ (2000) UN doc A/55/L 2.Google Scholar

United Nations, General Assembly ResolutionReport of the Secretary-General, ‘The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies’ (2004) UN doc S/2004/616.Google Scholar

United Nations, General Assembly ResolutionGeneral Assembly Resolution, ‘The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels’ (2006) UN doc A/RES/61/39.Google Scholar

United Nations, General Assembly ResolutionReport of the Secretary-General, ‘Uniting Our Strengths: Enhancing United Nations Support for the Rule of Law’ (2006) UN doc A/61/636–S/2006/980.Google Scholar

United Nations, General Assembly ResolutionGeneral Assembly Resolution, ‘The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels’ (2006) UN doc A/RES/61/39.Google Scholar

United Nations, General Assembly ResolutionReport of the Secretary-General, ‘Uniting Our Strengths: Enhancing United Nations Support for the Rule of Law’ (2008) UN doc A/63/226.Google Scholar

United Nations, General Assembly ResolutionReport of the Secretary-General, ‘Strengthening and Coordinating United Nations Rule of Law Activities’ (2011) UN doc A/66/133, 3.Google Scholar

United States Agency for International Development, ‘Guide to Rule of Law Country Analysis: The Rule of Law Strategic Framework’ (2008).Google Scholar

United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance, ‘Trial Court Performance Standards with Commentary’ (1997).Google Scholar

World Bank, Legal Vice Presidency, ‘Initiatives in Legal and Judicial Reform’ (2002).Google Scholar

World Bank, Legal Vice PresidencyLegal Vice Presidency, ‘Legal and Judicial Reform: Observations, Experiences, and Approach of the Legal Vice Presidency’ (2002).Google Scholar

World Bank, Legal Vice PresidencyLegal Vice Presidency, ‘Legal and Judicial Reform: Strategic Directions’ (2003).Google Scholar

World Bank, Legal Vice Presidency‘Doing Business 2020: Comparing Business Regulation in 190 Economies’ (2020).Google Scholar

World Bank, Legal Vice Presidency‘Doing Business 2020: Enforcing Contracts Questionnaire’ (2020).Google Scholar