Book contents
- International Judicial Review
- Studies on International Courts and Tribunals
- International Judicial Review
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Argument from Normative Legitimacy
- 3 The Argument from Systemic Epistemic Superiority
- 4 Why International Courts Improve Deliberation
- 5 Who Should Participate in the Courts’ Proceedings?
- 6 Creating the Right Incentives
- 7 Conclusions
- Bibliography
- Index
1 - Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 February 2020
Book contents
- International Judicial Review
- Studies on International Courts and Tribunals
- International Judicial Review
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Argument from Normative Legitimacy
- 3 The Argument from Systemic Epistemic Superiority
- 4 Why International Courts Improve Deliberation
- 5 Who Should Participate in the Courts’ Proceedings?
- 6 Creating the Right Incentives
- 7 Conclusions
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Chapter 1 is the introduction to the book. The chapter starts by presenting the main arguments posed by commentators against intervention of international courts in domestic affairs. It continues with a comprehensive overview of the arguments in the following chapters. Later, the chapter fleshes out the policy implications of the book and demonstrates how the combination of arguments in different chapters can help make policy choices that can determine when international courts should intervene.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- International Judicial ReviewWhen Should International Courts Intervene?, pp. 1 - 12Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020