“A Blind Eye to Invisible Trade,” Economist, July 11, 1981, 78.

“A GATT Call for Patience,” New York Times, November 27, 1984, D26.

“Accountancy: Friends in High Places – Backing from influential organizations should ease the task of setting up better international accounting standards,” Financial Times, November 26, 1998, 31.

“Achievements at Torquay,” Economist, December 23, 1950, 1162–1164.

“Assault Mapped on Trade Curbs,” New York Times, February 10, 1969, 55.

“Crumbs for the Poor,” Economist, February 25, 1978, 73.

“E5+2: A Rival to G4+1,” Accountancy (International Edition), January 1998, 8.

“Earlier U.N. Parley at Havana Laid Basis for New Tariff Pact,” New York Times, March 22, 1964, F10.

“Europe Sets out Its Stall,” Financial Times, August 13, 1998.

“Experts Perfect Reciprocity Plans,” New York Times, March 24, 1933, 1.

“GATT Maps Plan to Aid Poor Lands,” New York Times, November 27, 1964, 55.

“GATT Parley Maps Expansion of Trade,” New York Times, November 23, 1958, 25.

“Policy Fight Due on Foreign Trade,” New York Times, July 1, 1957, 31.

“Poor Lands’ Plan Slows UN Talks,” New York Times, May 22, 1964, 45.

“Poorer Lands See Danger for Trade,” New York Times, May 22, 1960, 17.

“Protection from Protectionists,” Economist, July 31, 1982, 18.

“Talks on Trade Start in Geneva,” New York Times, March 5, 1975, 64.

“Trade: Shuffling the Dealers,” Economist, February 15, 1975, 67.

“Trade in Trouble,” Economist, April 2, 1955, 34.

“Treasury Aide Warns 90-Nation Trade Pact May Require Revision,” Wall Street Journal, April 7, 1972, 2.

“U.N. Trade Talks Get New Proposal,” New York Times, May 25, 1964, 51.

“U.S. Assails U.N. Trade Statement,” New York Times, July 4, 1983, 27.

“U.S. Delegate to GATT Urges Work to End Non-Tariff Curbs,” New York Times, October 21, 1969, 61.

“World Trade Organization Supports IASC Standards,” Management Accounting: Magazine for Chartered Management Accountants 75 (1997), 3.

Aaronson, Susan, Trade and the American Dream: A Social History of Postwar Trade Policy, Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky, 1996.Google Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan, “Filling in the Folk Theorem,” manuscript, University of Chicago, 2005. Revision of a paper originally presented at the 2002 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (August 30–September 1, 2005), Boston, MA.

Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan“Hard and Soft Law in International Governance,” International Organization 54, 3 (2000), 421–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan“International Action on Bribery and Corruption: Why the Dog Didn't Bark in the WTO,” in Kennedy, Daniel L. M. and Southwick, James D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec, Cambridge University Press, 2002, 177–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan“Pathways to International Cooperation,” in Benvenisti, Eyal and Hirsch, Moshe (eds.), The Impact of International Law on International Cooperation: Theoretical Perspective, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004, 50–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan“Why States Act Through Formal International Organizations,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 42, 1 (February 1998), 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aggarwal, Vinod K. “Reconciling Multiple Institutions: Bargaining, Linkages and Nesting,” in Aggarwal, Vinod K. (ed.), Institutional Designs for a Complex World: Bargaining, Linkages & Nesting, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998, 1–31.Google Scholar

Aggarwal, Vinod K. (ed.), Institutional Designs for a Complex World: Bargaining, Linkages & Nesting, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998.

Akinsanya, Adeoye, and Davies, Arthur, “Third World Quest for a New International Economic Order: An Overview,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 33, 1 (January1984), 208–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, David, “A European True and Fair View?,” European Accounting Review 2 (1993), 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Karen, and Meunier, Sophie, “Nested and Overlapping Regimes in the Transatlantic Banana Trade Dispute,” Journal of European Public Policy 13, 3 (April 2006), 362–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Karen, and Meunier, Sophie“The Politics of International Regime Complexity,” Perspective on Politics, 7, 1 (2009), 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Society of International Law, “Re-Making the System of World Trade: A Proposal for Institutional Reform, Report of the Panel on International Trade Policy and Institutions,” Studies in Transnational Legal Policy 12 (1976), 1–57.Google Scholar

Amos, Maurice, “The Code Napoleon and the Modern World,” Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law 10 (1928), 222–236.Google Scholar

Aronson, Jonathan, Negotiating to Launch Negotiations: Getting Trade in Services on the GATT Agenda, Pew Case Studies in International Affairs, Case 125, Parts I & II, Washington, DC: Georgetown University, School of Foreign Service, Institute for the Study of Diplomacy, 1992.Google Scholar

Arthur, Brian, Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Axelrod, Robert, The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books, 1984.Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert, and Keohane, Robert O., “Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions,” in Oye, Kenneth A. (ed.), Cooperation Under Anarchy, Princeton University Press, 1986, 226–254.Google Scholar

Bagwell, Kyle, and Staiger, Robert W., The Economics of the World Trading System, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Baker, Kent, Nofsinger, John, and Weaver, Daniel, “International Cross-Listing and Visibility,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 37 (2002), 495–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, David A. (ed.), Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.

Barkin, J. Samuel, and DeSombre, Elizabeth R., “Unilateralism and Multilateralism in International Fisheries Management,” Global Governance 6 (2000), 339–360.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael, Dialogues in Arab Politics: Negotiations in Regional Order, New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael, and Duvall, Raymond (eds.), Power in Global Governance, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRef

Barnett, Michael N., and Finnemore, Martha, “The Politics, Power and Pathologies of International Organizations,” International Organization 53, 4 (Autumn 1999), 699–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnett, Michael N., and Finnemore, MarthaRules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Barnett, Richard, and Mueller, Ronald, Global Reach: The Power of the Multinational Corporations, New York: Simon and Schuster, 1974.Google Scholar

Barton, John H., Goldstein, Judith L., Josling, Timothy E., and Steinberg, Richard H., The Evolution of the Trade Regime: Politics, Law, and Economics of the GATT and the WTO, Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Basle Committee on Banking Supervision, Report to G-7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors on International Accounting Standards, April 2000.

Bates, Darrell, The Fashoda Incident of 1898: Encounter on the Nile, Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Bates, Robert, Avner Greif, Margaret Levi, Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, and Barry Weingast, Analytical Narratives, Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D., Agendas and Instability in American Politics, University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems, University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Frank R., Jones, Bryan D., and MacLeod, Michael C., “The Evolution of Legislative Jurisdictions,” Journal of Politics 62, 2 (2000), 321–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, Joachim, and Blaas, Wolfgang, “Introduction,” in Blaas, Wolfgang and Becker, Joachim (eds.), Strategic Arena Switching in International Trade Negotiations, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2007, 1–32.Google Scholar

Bendor, Jonathon, Kumar, Sunil, and Siegel, David A., “Satisficing: A ‘Pretty Good’ Heuristic,” manuscript, Stanford Graduate School of Business, 2004.

Benson, Henry, “The Story of International Accounting Standards,” Accountancy 87 (1976), 34–39.Google Scholar

Bernauer, Thomas, Elsig, Manfred, and Pauwelyn, Joost, “The World Trade Organization's Dispute Settlement Mechanism – Analysis and Problems,” in Narlikar, Amrita, Daunton, Martin, and Stern, Robert M. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of the WTO, Oxford University Press, 2012, 485–506.Google Scholar

Bhagwati, Jagdish N., “Introduction,” in Bhagwati, Jagdish N. and Ruggie, John Gerard (eds.), Power, Passions and Purpose: Prospects for North-South Negotiations, New York: Columbia University Press, 1984, 1–18.Google Scholar

Bhagwati, Jagdish N.“Letting Politics Mandate Trade Policy,” New York Times, September 9, 1984, F3.

Bhagwati, Jagdish N., and Ruggie, John Gerard (eds.), Power, Passions and Purpose: Prospects for North-South Negotiations, New York: Columbia University Press, 1984.

Bhattacharya, Anindya K., “The Influence of the International Secretariat: UNCTAD and Generalized Tariff Preferences,” International Organization 30, 1 (Winter 1976), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blough, Roy, “The Furtherance of Economic Development,” International Organization 19, 3 (Summer 1965), 562–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blunt, Wilfrid Scawen, Secret History of the Occupation of Egypt, Farnborough: Gregg International, 1907.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, J., and Drahos, P., Global Business Regulation, Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Brinton, Jasper, The Mixed Courts of Egypt, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, revised edition, 1968.Google Scholar

Brinton, Jasper,British Yearbook of International Law 18, Oxford University Press, 1937.Google Scholar

Broadman, Harry G., “GATS: The Uruguay Round Accord on International Trade and Investment in Services,” World Economy 17, 3 (May 1994), 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronz, George, “An International Trade Organization: The Second Attempt,” Harvard Law Review 69, 3 (1956), 440–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruce, Robert, “Companies Urged to Have Faith in IFRS,” Financial Times, October 6, 2005, 13.

Brunsson, Nils, and Olsen, Johan, The Reforming Organization, London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar

Burley, Anne-Marie, and Mattli, Walter, “Europe Before The Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration,” International Organization 47 (Winter 1993), 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busch, Marc L., “Overlapping Institutions, Forum Shopping, and Dispute Settlement in International Trade,” International Organization 61, 4 (Fall 2007), 735–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Büthe, Tim, and Mattli, Walter, The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy, Princeton University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cairns, David, Applying International Accounting Standards, London: Butterworths, 1999.Google Scholar

Cairns, David“UN's Lofty Accounting Ambitions,” Accountancy (International Edition) 17 (1996).Google Scholar

Cairns, David (ed.), The IASC: Evolution, Achievements and Prospects, London: IASC, 1999.

Calvert, Randall, “Rational Actors, Equilibrium and Institutions,” in Knight, Jack and Sened, Itai (eds.), Explaining Social Institutions, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1995, 57–94.Google Scholar

Cameron, D. A., Egypt in the Nineteenth Century, London: Smith Elder, 1898.Google Scholar

Cannon, Byron, Politics of Law and the Courts of Nineteenth Century Egypt, University of Utah Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Capithorne, Lawrence, “International Corporate Transfer Prices and Government Policy,” Canadian Journal of Economics 4 (1971), 324–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cappocia, Giovanni, and Kelemen, Daniel, “The Study of Critical Junctures: Theories, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism,” World Politics 59 (April 2007), 341–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey T., “International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework,” International Organization 59 (Fall 2005), 801–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Choi, Frederick, and Mueller, Gerhard, International Accounting, 2nd edn., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1992.Google Scholar

Chwieroth, Jeffrey W., Capital Ideas: The IMF and the Rise of Financial Liberalization, Princeton University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coffield, Shirley A., “International Services-Trade Issues and the GATT,” in Rubin, Seymour J. and Graham, Thomas R. (eds.), Managing Trade Relations in the 1980s: Issues Involved in the GATT Ministerial Meeting of 1982, Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 1983, 69–108.Google Scholar

Cohen, Michael, March, James, and Olsen, Johan, “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice,” Administrative Science Quarterly 17, 1 (March 1972), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohn, Theodore H., Governing Global Trade: International Institutions in Conflict and Convergence, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2002.Google Scholar

Cole, Juan, Colonialism and Revolution in the Middle East: Social and Cultural Origins of Egypt's Urabi Movement, Princeton University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colomer, Josep, Strategic Transitions: Game Theory and Democratization, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Cooley, Alexander, and Spruyt, Hendrik, Contracting States: Sovereign Transfers in International Relations, Princeton University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornford, Andrew, “Variable Geometry for the WTO: Concept and Precedents,” UNCTAD Discussion Paper no. 171 (May 2004),UNCTAD/OSG/DP/2004/5.Google Scholar

Crawford, Beverly, “An Empty Nest? Reconciling European Security Institutions in the Bosnian Crisis,” in Aggarwal, Vinod K. (ed.), Institutional Designs for a Complex World: Bargaining, Linkages & Nesting, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998, 84–123.Google Scholar

Crawley, C. W., “The Mediterranean,” in Bury, John P. T. (ed.), The New Cambridge History 10, Cambridge University Press, 1960, 416–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croome, John, Reshaping the World Trading System: A History of the Uruguay Round, Geneva: WTO, 1995.Google Scholar

Curzon, Gerard, and Curzon, Victoria, “GATT: Traders’ Club,” in Cox, Robert W. and Jacobson, Harold K. (eds.), The Anatomy of Influence: Decision Making in International Organizations, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1974, 298–333.Google Scholar

Curzon Price, Victoria, “New Institutional Developments in GATT,” Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 1 (1992), 87–110.

Dai, Xinyuan, and Snidal, Duncan, “International Cooperation Theory,” in Denemark, Robert A. (ed.), The International Studies Encyclopedia 6, New York: Wiley/Blackwell, 2010, 4001–4020.Google Scholar

Dale, Edwin L., “US Lists Trade Objectives and Timetable for GATT,” New York Times, November 11, 1972, NJ69.

Dam, Kenneth W., The Rules of the Global Game: A New Look at US International Economic Policymaking, University of Chicago Press, 2001.Google Scholar

David, Paul, “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY,” American Economic Review 75 (1985), 332–337.Google Scholar

David, Paul“Why Are Institutions the ‘Carriers of History’? Path Dependence and the Evolution of Conventions, Organizations, and Institutions,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 5, 2 (1994), 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, Christina, Food Fights Over Free Trade: How International Institutions Promote Agricultural Trade Liberalization, Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

De Freycinet, Charles, La Question d’Egypte, Paris: Calmann-Levy, 1904.Google Scholar

De Herreros, Enrique Garcia, Les Tribunaux Mixtes d’Egypte, Paris: Molco, Petrini, 1914.Google Scholar

Deese, David A., World Trade Politics: Power, Principles, and Leadership, New York: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar

Demaret, Paul, “The Metamorphoses of the GATT: From the Havana Charter to the World Trade Organization,” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 34 (1996), 123–171.Google Scholar

Diebold, William, “The End of the ITO,” Essays in International Finance 16, International Finance Section, Princeton University, October 1952.Google Scholar

Diebold, William, and Stalson, Helena, “Negotiating Issues in International Services Transactions,” in Bergsten, C. Fred and Cline, William R. (eds.), Trade Policy in the 1980s, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983, 581–609.Google Scholar

Diggle, Graham, and Nobes, Christopher, “European Rule-Making in Accounting: The Seventh Directive as a Case Study,” Accounting and Business Research 24 (1994), 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DiMaggio, Paul, and Powell, Walter, “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality,” American Sociological Review 48 (April 1983), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobbin, Frank, Forging Industrial Policy, Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowding, Keith, “The Compatibility of Behavioralism, Rational Choice and ‘New Institutionalism,’” Journal of Theoretical Politics 6 (1994), 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downs, George, Rocke, David M., and Barsoom, Peter, “Managing the Evolution of Multilateralism,” International Organization 52, 2 (Spring 1998), 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drache, Daniel, “The Short but Significant Life of the International Trade Organization: Lessons for Our Time,” Working Paper, University of Warwick, Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, Coventry, 2000.

Drake, William J., and Nicolaïdis, Kalypso, “Ideas, Interests and Institutionalization: ‘Trade in Services’ and the Uruguay Round,” International Organization 46, 1 (Winter 1992), 37–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drew, Elizabeth, “Profiles, Equations,” New Yorker, May 7, 1979, 50–129.

Drezner, Daniel, All Politics is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes, Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Duffield, John S., “The Limits of Rational Design,” International Organization 57, 2 (Spring 2003), 411–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eichengreen, Barry, and Irwin, Douglas, “The Slide to Protectionism in the Great Depression: Who Succumbed and Why?,” Journal of Economic History 70 (2010), 871–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eichengreen, Barry, and Irwin, Douglas“Trade Blocs, Currency Blocs and the Reorientation of World Trade in the 1930s,” Journal of International Economics 38 (1995), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenstadt, Shmuel, “Bureaucracy, Bureaucratization and Debureaucratization,” Administrative Science Quarterly 4 (1959), 302–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenstadt, ShmuelEssays on Comparative Institutions, New York: John Wiley, 1965.Google Scholar

Eisenstadt, ShmuelThe Political System of Empires, New York: Free Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Emenyou, Emmanuel, and Gray, Sidney, “EC Accounting Harmonization: An Empirical Study of Measurement Practices in France, Germany and the UK,” Accounting and Business Research 22 (1992), 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, David, and Halloran, Sharyn O, Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making Under Separate Powers, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, John W., “The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade,” International Organization 22, 1 (Winter 1968), 72–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fahmy, Khaled, All the Pasha's Men: Mehemed Ali, His Army, and the Making of Modern Egypt, Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Farless, Nada J., “GATT and the Tokyo Round: Legal Implications of the New Trade Agreement,” California Western International Law Journal 11 (1981), 302–325.Google Scholar

Farnsworth, Clyde H., “3D-World Group Said to Impede Trade,” New York Times, November 15, 1985, D2.

Farnsworth, Clyde H.“Forum Discussed for Trade Group,” New York Times, May 24, 1972, 63.

Farnsworth, Clyde H.“Free Trade Priority: Services,” New York Times, August 15, 1979, D2.

Farnsworth, Clyde H.“GATT Negotiators Trim Trade Barriers,” New York Times, May 15, 1972, 53.

Farnsworth, Clyde H.“Last-Ditch Bargaining for GATT,” New York Times, November 27, 1982, 35.

Farnsworth, Clyde H.“President Urges Free, Fair Trade,” New York Times, May 25, 1972, 65.

Farnsworth, Clyde H.“Rogers Vows to Aid Free Trade But Warns Others to Act Fairly,” New York Times, June 8, 1971, 51.

Farnsworth, Clyde H.“Small Countries Resisting US Bid,” New York Times, May 13, 1972, 39, 43.

Farnsworth, Clyde H.“Trade Talk Topics Are Determined,” New York Times, January 18, 1982, D1.

Farnsworth, Clyde H.“Trade Talks’ Topic: Services,” New York Times, June 2, 1980, D2.

Farnsworth, Clyde H.“Warnings Precede Start of World Trade Talks,” New York Times, September 13, 1986, 33.

Farrell, Henry, and Adrienne, Héritier, “Introduction: Contested Competences in the European Union,” West European Politics, 30, 2 (March 2007), 227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fearon, James, “Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation,” International Organization 52 (Spring 1998), 269–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fearon, James, and Wendt, Alexander, “Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View,” in Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A. (eds.), Handbook of International Relations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002, 52–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feis, Herbert, “The Geneva Proposals for an International Trade Charter,” International Organization 2, 1 (February 1948), 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feketekuty, Geza, “Appendix: A Guide to Services Negotiations,” in Mattoo, Aaditya, Stern, Robert M., and Zanini, Gianni (eds.), Handbook of International Trade in Services, Oxford University Press, 2008, 542–592.Google Scholar

Feketekuty, GezaInternational Trade in Services: An Overview and Blueprint for Negotiations, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publications, 1988.Google Scholar

Financial Stability Forum, Issues Paper of the Task Force on Implementation of Standards, presented at the FSF meeting March 25–26, 2000.

Finger, Matthias, and Magarinos-Ruchat, Bérangère, “The Transformation of International Public Organizations: The Case of UNCTAD,” in Kijkzeul, Dennis and Beigbeder, Yves (eds.), Rethinking International Organizations: Pathology and Promise, New York: Berghahn Books, 2003, 140–165.Google Scholar

Finkel, Caroline, Osman's Dream: The History of the Ottoman Empire, New York: Basic Books, 2000.Google Scholar

Finlayson, Jock A., and Zacher, Mark W., “The GATT and the Regulation of Trade Barriers: Regime Dynamics and Functions,” International Organization 35, 4 (Autumn 1981), 561–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn, “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization 52, 4 (Autumn 1998), 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fioretos, Orfeo, Creative Reconstructions: Multilateralism and European Varieties of Capitalism after 1950, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Fioretos, Orfeo“Historical Institutionalism in International Relations,” International Organization 65, 2 (Spring 2011), 367–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fligstein, Neil, The Transformation of Corporate Control, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Jeffry, Frieden, Global Capitalism: Its Fall and Rise in the Twentieth Century, New York: W.W. Norton, 2006.Google Scholar

Fudenberg, Drew, and Maskin, Eric, “The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information,” Econometrica 54, 3 (May 1986), 533–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

G7, Declaration of G-7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors, October 30, 1998.

Fudenberg, Drew, and Maskin, EricFinal Report to the G-7 Heads of State and Government on Promoting Financial Stability, June 21, 1997.

Fudenberg, Drew, and Maskin, EricStrengthening the Architecture of the Global Financial System: Report of the G-7 Finance Ministers to the G-7 Heads of State or Government for their meeting in Birmingham, May 15, 1998.

Gadbaw, Michael, “The Outlook for GATT as an Institution,” in Rubin, Seymour J. and Graham, Thomas R. (eds.), Managing Trade Relations in the 1980s: Issues Involved in the GATT Ministerial Meeting of 1982, Totowa, NJ: Roman & Allanheld, 1983, 33–49.Google Scholar

Gardner, Richard N., “GATT and the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development,” International Organization 18, 4 (Autumn 1964), 685–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, Richard N.“The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development,” International Organization 22, 1 (Winter 1968), 99–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garrett, Laurie, “The Next Pandemic?,” Foreign Affairs (July/August 2005).

Garrett, LaurieGeneral Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, GATT Digital Library 1947–1994, . Unless otherwise noted, all numbered GATT documents derive from this source.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. C/31, “The Work of the Contracting Parties in the Field of Economic Development: Expansion of the Provisions of the General Agreement,” April 25, 1963.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. CG.18/13, “Note on the Thirteenth Meeting of the Consultative Group of Eighteen, 30–31 October 1980,” November 25, 1980.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. CG.18/49, “Trade in Services and the GATT,” March 6, 1981.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. CG.18/W/45, “International Trade in Services,” October 10, 1980.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. CG.18/W/63, “Activities by Other Organizations in the Field of Services,” October 15, 1981.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. COM.IND/4, “Inventory of Non-Tariff Barriers,” August 30, 1968.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. COM.IND/6, “Inventory of Non-Tariff Barriers,” December 2, 1968.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. COM.IND/W/18/Rev.1, “Draft Report to Council,” December 10, 1969.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. COM.IND/W/76, “Techniques and Modalities, Technical Note by the Secretariat,” May 17, 1972.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. COM.IND/W/83, “Note by the Secretariat,” June 27, 1972.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. COM.IND/W/87, “Note by the Secretariat,” August 3, 1972.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. COM.TD/28, “Recent Developments Relevant to the Operation of Part IV of the General Agreement,” October 14, 1966.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. L/110, “Releases Granted by the Contracting Parties under Article XVIII: Expiration of Releases,” August 24, 1953.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. L/2171/Add.1, “United Nations Conference on Trade and Development 1964: Submission by the GATT Secretariat,” April 15, 1964.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. L/2281, “Committee on the Legal and Institutional Framework of the GATT in Relation to Developing Countries,” October 26, 1964.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. L/2314/Rev.1, “Legal and Institutional Framework,” November 20, 1964.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. L/3116, “Expansion of Trade: Statement by the Director-General,” November 13, 1968.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. L/5476, “Exchange of Information Pursuant to the Ministerial Decision on Services: Communication from the United States,” April 13, 1983.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. L/5838, “Trade in Services,” July 9, 1985.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. L/5846, “United States Goals for New Multilateral Trade Negotiations,” July 12, 1985.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. L/939, “Expansion of International Trade: Decision of 17 November 1958 and Appointment of Committees,” November 27, 1958.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. L/96, “Operation of the General Agreement: Note by the Executive Secretary,” June 18, 1953.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. L4914, “Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Status of Acceptances as of 17 December 1979,” Geneva, December 18, 1979.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. MIN.DEC, “Ministerial Declaration on the Uruguay Round,” September 20, 1986.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. PREP.COM(86) SR/5, “Preparatory Committee, Record of Discussions: Discussions of 14–16 April,” June 19, 1986.

Garrett, Laurie GATT Doc. PREP.COM(86) W/34, “Trade in Services,” June 11, 1986.

Garrett, LaurieTrends in International Trade: A Report by a Panel of Experts [The Haberler Report], Geneva, 1958.

Gershoni, Israel, and Jankowski, James, Redefining the Egyptian Nation, 1930–1945, Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilpin, Robert, War and Change in World Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giniger, Henry, “Worsening Noted in Trade Picture,” New York Times, October 13, 1958, 41.

Glaser, Charles L., “Realists as Optimists: Cooperation as Self-Help,” International Security 19, 3 (Winter 1994/95), 50–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glick, Leslie Alan, Multilateral Trade Negotiations: World Trade After the Tokyo Round, Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 1984.Google Scholar

Gold, Philip H., “Legal Problems in Expanding the Scope of GATT to Include Trade in Services,” International Trade Law Journal 7 (Winter 1982/83), 281–305.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Victor P., “Institutional Change and the Quasi-Invisible Hand,” Journal of Law and Economics 17, 2 (October 1974), 461–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldgeier, J. M., and Tetlock, P. E., “Psychology and International Relations Theory,” Annual Review of Political Science 4 (June 2001), 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldschmidt, Arthur, “The Egyptian Nationalist Party: 1892–1919,” in Holt, P. M. (ed.), Political and Social Change in Modern Egypt, Oxford University Press, 1968, 308–333.Google Scholar

Goldstein, Judith, and Gulotty, Robert, “America and Trade Liberalization: The Limits of Institutional Reform,” paper prepared for 2012 American Political Science Association Meeting.

Goldstein, Judith, and Steinberg, Richard, “Regulatory Shift: The Rise of Judicial Liberalization at the WTO,” in Mattli, Walter and Woods, Ngaire (eds.), The Politics of Global Regulation, Princeton University Press, 2009, 221–241.Google Scholar

Gorter, Wytze, “GATT after Six Years: An Appraisal,” International Organization 8, 1 (1954), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gowa, Joanne, and Kim, Soo Yeon, “An Exclusive Country Club: The Effects of the GATT on Trade, 1950–94,” World Politics 57 (2005), 453–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grieco, Joseph M., Cooperation Among Nations: Europe, America, and Non-tariff Barriers to Trade, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Grier, Peter, “US Hopes to Put ‘Services’ on Big Trade-talks Agenda,” Christian Science Monitor, April 12, 1982, 11.

Grilli, Enzo, and Yang, Maw Cheng, “Primary Commodity Prices, Manufactured Goods Prices, and the Terms of Trade of Developing Countries: What the Long Run Shows,” World Bank Economic Review 2, 1 (1988), 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gruber, Lloyd, Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions, Princeton University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haas, Ernst B., “Why Collaborate? Issue-Linkage and International Re-gimes,” World Politics 32, 3 (April 1980), 357–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hafner-Burton, Emilie, Forced to Be Good: Why Trade Agreements Boost Human Rights, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Hafner-Burton, Emilie“Forum Shopping for Human Rights: The Transformation of Preferential Trade,” presented at the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September 1–4, 2005.

Hafner-Burton, Emilie, and Pollack, Mark, “Mainstreaming Gender in European Union Policymaking,” Journal of European Public Policy 7, 1 (September 2000), 432–456.Google Scholar

Hafner-Burton, Emilie, and Pollack, Mark “Mainstreaming Gender in Global Governance,” European Journal of International Relations 8, 3 (September 2002), 339–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haftel, Yoram Z., and Thompson, Alexander, “The Independence of International Organizations: Concept and Applications,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50, 2 (April 2006), 253–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haggard, Stephan, and Simmons, Beth A., “Theories of International Regimes,” International Organization 41, 3 (Summer 1987), 491–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, Peter, “Historical Institutionalism in Rationalist and Sociological Perspective,” in Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen (eds.), Explaining Institutional Change, Cambridge University Press, 2011, 204–223.Google Scholar

Hall, Peter, and Taylor, Rosemary, “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms,” Political Studies 44 (December 1996), 936–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hallberg, Charles, The Suez Canal: Its History and Diplomatic Importance, New York: Columbia University Press, 1931.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Geoffrey, The Control of Multinationals: What Future for International Codes of Conduct in the 1980s?IRM Multinational Reports, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1984.Google Scholar

Hansen, Bent, “Income and Consumption in Egypt, 1886/1887 to 1937,” International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 10 (1979), 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, Michael, A Trading Nation: Canadian Trade Policy from Colonialism to Globalization, Vancouver: UBC Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Haskins, Mark, Ferris, Kenneth, and Selling, Thomas, International Financial Reporting and Analysis: A Contextual Emphasis, 2nd edn., Boston, MA: Irwin McGraw-Hill, 2000.Google Scholar

Haufler, Virginia, A Public Role for the Private Sector: Industry Self-Regulation in a Global Economy, Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2001.Google Scholar

Hegarty, John, “Accounting Integration in Europe: Still on Track,” Journal of Accountancy 175 (1993), 92–95.Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R., “Forum Shopping for Human Rights,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148, 2 (December 1999), 285–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R.“Regime Shifting: The TRIPS Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking,” Yale Journal of International Law 29 (2004), 1–83.Google Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard M., “General Agreement on Trade in Services,” in The New World Trading System: Readings, Paris: OECD, 1994, 177–187.Google Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard M.“Tentative First Steps: An Assessment of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Services,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 1455 (May 1995).

Hoekman, Bernard M., and Kostecki, Michel M., The Political Economy of the World Trading System: The WTO and Beyond, 2nd edn., Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, Michael L., “5 Issues Blocking New GATT Accord,” New York Times, January 23, 1955, 17.

Hoffman, Michael L.“Gains in Revision of GATT Reported,” New York Times, December 4, 1954, 3.

Hoffman, Michael L.“Revision of Code Advanced in GATT,” New York Times, January 26, 1955, 9.

Hoffman, Michael L.“Tariff Body Opens Key Geneva Talks,” New York Times, October 29, 1954, 2.

Hopwood, Anthony, “Some Reflections on ‘The Harmonization of Accounting Within the EU,’” European Accounting Review 3 (1994), 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoyle, Mark, Mixed Courts of Egypt, London: Graham & Trotman, 1990.Google Scholar

Hufbauer, G. C., Erb, J. Shelton, and Starr, H. P., “The GATT Codes and the Unconditional Most-Favored-Nation Principle,” Law & Policy in International Business 12 (1980), 59–93.Google Scholar

Hunter, Robert, Egypt Under the Khedives, 1805–1879: From Household Government to Modern Bureaucracy, University of Pittsburgh Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Ikenberry, G. John, After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars, Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

IMF, Report of the Management Director to the Interim Committee on Progress in Strengthening the Architecture of the International Financial System, April 26, 1999.

Interim Commission for the International Trade Organization, ICITO document 1/16, “Memorandum by the Executive Secretary for the Consideration of an Emergency Session of the Executive Committee,” July 1, 1949, 4.

Ikenberry, G. John ICITO document 1/24, “Ratification of the Havana Charter: Note by the Executive Secretary,” October 31, 1949.

Irwin, Douglas A., Mavroidis, Petros C., and Sykes, Alan O., The Genesis of the GATT, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, John H. “The Birth of the GATT-MTN System: A Constitutional Appraisal,” Law and Policy in International Business 12 (1980), 21–58.Google Scholar

Jackson, John H.“The Crumbling Institutions of the Liberal Trade System,” Journal of World Trade Law 12 (March/April 1978), 93–106.Google Scholar

Jackson, John H.“GATT Machinery and the Tokyo Round Agreements,” in Cline, William R. (ed.), Trade Policy in the 1980s, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 1983, 159–187.Google Scholar

Jackson, John H.“International Economic Problems and Their Management in the 21st Century,” Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law 9 (1979), 497–506.Google Scholar

Jackson, John H.“Review of Developing Countries in the GATT Legal System by Robert E. Hudec,” American Journal of International Law 84, 4 (October 1990), 964–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, John H.World Trade and the Law of GATT, Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1969.Google Scholar

Jackson, John H.The World Trading System: Law and Politics of International Economic Relations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Jackson, Robert H., Quasi-states: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Jacoby, Wade, The Enlargement of the European Union and NATO: Ordering from the Menu in Central Europe, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Bryan D., “Bounded Rationality,” Annual Review of Political Science 2 (1999), 297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Bryan D.Politics and the Architecture of Choice: Bounded Rationality and Governance, University of Chicago Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Jupille, Joseph, Procedural Politics: Issues, Influence and Institutional Choice in the European Union, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jupille, Joseph, Caporaso, James A., and Checkel, Jeffrey T., “Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union,” Comparative Political Studies 36, 1–2 (February/March 2003), 7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahler, Miles, “Multilateralism with Small and Large Numbers,” International Organization 46, 3 (Summer 1992), 681–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahler, Miles“Rationality in International Relations,” International Organization 52, 4 (1998), 919–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahler, Miles, and Lake, David, “Globalization and Changing Patterns of Political Authority,” in Kahler, Miles and Lake, David (eds.), Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition, Princeton University Press, 2003, 412–438.Google Scholar

Kahler, Miles, and Lake, David,“Globalization and Governance,” in Kahler, Miles and Lake, David (eds.), Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition, Princeton University Press, 2003, 1–30.Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack, and Thaler, Richard, “Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5, 1 (1991), 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karolyi, Andrew, “Why Do Companies List Shares Abroad? A Survey of the Evidence and its Managerial Implications,” Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments 7 (1998), 1–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O., and Krasner, Stephen D., “International Organization and the Study of World Politics,” International Organization 52, 4 (Autumn 1998), 645–686.Google Scholar

Kempe, Frederick, “The UN's Bolton Moment,” Wall Street Journal, November 29, 2005.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O.“The Demand for International Regimes’, in Krasner, Stephen D. (ed.), International Regimes, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983, 141–172.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O.“Reciprocity in International Relations,” International Organization 40, 1 (Winter 1986), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, David, TurfWars: How Congressional Committees Claim Jurisdiction, University of Chicago Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinross, Lord, The Ottoman Centuries: The Rise and Fall of the Turkish Empire, New York: Harper, 1979.Google Scholar

Klein, Hans, “Working with the Resources at Hand: Constraints on Internet Institutional Design,” Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 18, 3 (September 2004), 398–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, Jack, Institutions and Social Conflict, Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koremenos, Barbara, “Contracting Around International Uncertainty,” American Political Science Review 99, 4 (November 2005), 549–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koremenos, Barbara,“Loosening the Ties that Bind: A Learning Model of Agreement Flexibility,” International Organization 55, 2 (Spring 2001), 289–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan, “The Rational Design of International Institutions,” International Organization 55, 4 (Autumn 2001), 761–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan (eds.), The Rational Design of International Institutions, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Krasner, Stephen, “Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier,” World Politics 43 (1991), 336–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krasner, Stephen“Regimes and the Limits of Realism: Regimes as Autonomous Variables,” International Organization 36, 2 (Spring 1982), 487–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krasner, StephenStructural Conflict: The Third World Against Global Liberalism, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen“The Tokyo Round: Particularist Interests and Prospects for Stability in the Global Trading System,” International Studies Quarterly 23, 4 (December 1979), 491–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krasner, Stephen“Transforming International Regimes: What the Third World Wants, and Why,” International Studies Quarterly 25, 1 (March 1981), 119–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D. (ed.), International Regimes, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983.

Lake, David A., Entangling Relations: American Foreign Policy in Its Century, Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Lall, Sanjaya, “Transfer Pricing by Multinational Manufacturing Firms,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics (1973), 173–195.

Lane, Edward William, An Account of the Manners and Customs of the Modern Egyptians, New York: Dover Publications, 1973.Google Scholar

Lesseps, Charles, Les Capitulations et la Réforme Judiciaire en Egypte: Sa Nécessité – Son Urgence, Paris: A. Chaix et Co., 1867.Google Scholar

Levi, Margaret, “Reconsiderations of Rational Choice in Comparative and Historical Analysis,” in Lichbach, Marc Irving and Zuckerman, Alan (eds.), Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, 2nd edn., New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008, 117–133.Google Scholar

Levinthal, Daniel, and March, James, “The Myopia of Learning,” Strategic Management Journal 14 (1994), 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, J. “Prospect Theory and International Relations: Theoretical Applications and Analytical Problems,” Political Psychology 13 (1992), 283–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, Bernard, “The Near and Middle East and North Africa,” in Thompson, David (ed.), The New Cambridge Modern History 12, Cambridge University Press, 1960, 205–235.Google Scholar

Lewis, Paul, “A Fight on Trade in Services,” New York Times, October 2, 1985, D1.

Lewis, Paul“For Freer Trade, Still a Long Haul,” New York Times, February 4, 1979, IES3.

Lewis, Paul“Free Trade Talks Set to Begin,” New York Times, September 30, 1985, D10.

Lewis, Paul“Trade in Services Urged as Parley Topic,” New York Times, October 1, 1985, D8.

Lewis, Paul“Trade Talks End in Compromise,” New York Times, July 3, 1983, 1.

Lewis, Paul“U.S. Wins Trade Talk Go-Ahead,” New York Times, October 3, 1985, D1.

Lindblom, Charles E., Politics and Markets: The World's Political-Economic Systems, New York: Basic Books, 1977.Google Scholar

Lindblom, Charles E.“The Science of ‘Muddling Through,’” Public Administration Review 19, 2 (Spring 1959), 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linder, Staffan B., “The Significance of GATT for Under-Developed Countries,” in Proceedings of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva, 23 March–16 June 1964, vol. 5, Financing & Indivisibles; Institutional Arrangements, New York: United Nations, 1964, 502–533.Google Scholar

Lippman, Thomas W., “US Fights Trade Restriction on Services; Wants to Widen Scope of GATT,” Washington Post, October 17, 1982, G1.

Lipsey, Robert E., “Measuring International Trade in Services,” in Reinsdorf, Marshall and Slaughter, Matthew (eds.), International Flows of Invisibles: Trade in Services and Intangibles in the Era of Globalization, University of Chicago Press, 2008, 27–74. Draft version of January 5, 2008 at (consulted October 21, 2008).Google Scholar

Lipson, Charles, “The Transformation of Trade: The Sources and Effects of Regime Change,” International Organization 36, 2 (Spring 1982), 233–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Littlewood, Fran, “Hard Politicking Ahead,” Financial Times, February 8, 2000.

Litvac, S., and Maule, T., “The Multinational Firm and Conflicting National Interests,” Journal of World Trade Law 3 (1969), 309–316.Google Scholar

Lowenfeld, Andreas, International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Lynch, Colum, “Bolton Admonishes UN,” Washington Post, November 23, 2005.

Macgregor, John, Commercial Statistics, London: Whittaker and Company, 1850.Google Scholar

Maddison, Angus, The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective, Paris: OECD, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Madsen, Jacob, “Trade Barriers and the Collapse of World Trade During the Great Depression,” Southern Economic Journal 67 (2001), 848–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maffucci, Marianna, “Liberalization of International Trade in the Service Sector: Threshold Problems and a Proposed Framework Under the GATT,” Fordham International Law Journal 5 (Winter 1981/82), 371–409.Google Scholar

Mahoney, James, “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology,” Theory and Society 29 (2000), 507–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen, “A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change,” in Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen (eds.), Explaining Institutional Change, Cambridge University Press, 2011, 1–37.Google Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico, Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Mann, Michael, “The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms, and Results,” Archives européennes de sociologie 25 (1984), 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfield, Peter, The British in Egypt, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1971.Google Scholar

March, James, “Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of Choice,” The Bell Journal of Economics 9, 2 (Autumn 1978), 587–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

March, James, and Olsen, Johan, “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life,” American Political Science Review 78, 3 (September 1984), 734–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

March, James, and Olsen, JohanRediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics, New York: Free Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Martin, Lisa L., “Interests, Power, and Multilateralism,” International Organization 46, 4 (Autumn 1992), 765–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Will, “Trade Policies, Developing Countries, and Globalization,” manuscript, Development Research Group, World Bank, October 9, 2001. , last accessed June 20, 2012.

Martinez, Leonardo, Private Expertise and Global Economic Governance: The Case of International Accounting Standards (1972–2001), Oxford University M.Phil. thesis in International Relations, 2001.Google Scholar

Mattli, Walter, The Logic of Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond, Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mattli, Walter“Private Justice in a Global Economy: From Litigation to Arbitration,” International Organization 55, 4 (Autumn 2001), 919–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mattli, Walter“Private Justice in a Global Economy: From Litigation to Arbitration,” in Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan (eds.), The Rational Design of International Institutions, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004, 159–188.Google Scholar

Mattli, Walter“Public and Private Governance in Setting International Standards,” in Kahler, Miles and Lake, David (eds.), Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition, Princeton University Press, 2003, 199–225.Google Scholar

Mattli, Walter, and Büthe, Tim, “Accountability in Accounting? The Politics of Private Rule-making in the Public Interest,” Governance 18 (2005), 399–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mattli, Walter, and Büthe, Tim“The Politics of Setting International Standards: Technological Rationality or Primacy of Power?,” World Politics 56 (2003), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mattoo, Aaditya, Stern, Robert M., and Zanini, Gianni (eds.), Handbook of International Trade in Services, Oxford University Press, 2008.

McCulloch, John R., A Dictionary, Practical, Theoretical, and Historical, of Commerce and Commercial Navigation, London: Longmans, Green, 1871.Google Scholar

McNeely, Connie L., Constructing the Nation-State: International Organization and Prescriptive Action, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1995.Google Scholar

McRae, D. M., and Thomas, J. C., “The GATT and Multilateral Treaty Making: The Tokyo Round,” American Journal of International Law 77, 1 (January 1983), 51–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mearsheimer, John J., “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security 19, 3 (Winter 1994/95), 5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mearsheimer, John J.The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York: W. W. Norton, 2001.Google Scholar

Meier, Gerald M., “UNCTAD Proposals for International Economic Reform,” Stanford Law Review 19, 6 (June 1967), 1173–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, John, and Rowan, Brian, “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structures as Myth and Ceremony,” American Journal of Sociology 83, 2 (September 1977), 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milner, Viscount, England in Egypt, 13th edn., London: Edward Arnold, 1920.Google Scholar

Moe, Terry M., “The Politics of Structural Choice: Toward a Theory of Public Bureaucracy,” in Williamson, Oliver E. (ed.), Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond, New York: Oxford University Press, 1990, 116–153.Google Scholar

Moe, Terry M.,“Power and Political Institutions,” Perspective on Politics 3, 2 (June 2005), 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mooney, Richard E., “Groundwork is Laid for New Trade Talk,” New York Times, April 19, 1963, 45.

Mooney, Richard E.“Plan Formulated to End Trade Rift,” New York Times, June 12, 1964, 47.

Mooney, Richard E.“Russians Favor One Trade Body,” New York Times, April 6, 1964, 45.

Mooney, Richard E.“US and Soviets to Vie for Favor of Poorer Lands,” New York Times, March 22, 1964, F1.

Morrow, James D., “Modeling the Forms of International Cooperation: Distribution Versus Information,” International Organization 48, 3 (Summer 1994), 387–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mueller, Milton, “Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of ICANN's Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy,” Information Society 17 (2001), 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muller, Ronald, and Morgenstern, Richard, “Multinational Companies and Balance of Payment in LDCs: An Econometric Analysis of Export Pricing Behavior,” Kyklos 27 (1974), 304–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Narlikar, Amrita, The World Trade Organization: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Narlikar, Amrita, Daunton, Martin, and Stern, Robert M. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of the WTO, Oxford University Press, 2012.

Nielson, Daniel L., and Tierney, Michael J., “Delegation to International Organizations: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform,” International Organization 57, 2 (Spring 2003), 241–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nobes, Christopher, and Parker, Robert, Comparative International Accounting, London: FT Prentice Hall, 2004.Google Scholar

Noble, Kenneth B., “Services are the New Trade Frontier,” New York Times, February 7, 1982, E20.

North, Douglass C., Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nye, Joseph S., “UNCTAD: Poor Nations’ Pressure Group,” in Cox, Robert W. and Jacobson, Harold K. (eds.), The Anatomy of Influence: Decision Making in International Organizations, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1974, 334–370.Google Scholar

Odell, John, “Bounded Rationality and the World Political Economy,” in Andrews, David, Henning, C. Randall, and Pauly, Louis W. (eds.), Governing the World's Economy, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2002, 168–193.Google Scholar

Odell, John, and Eichengreen, Barry, “The United States, the ITO and the WTO: Exit Options, Agent Slack, and Presidential Leadership,” in Krueger, Ann O. (ed.), The WTO as an International Organization, University of Chicago Press, 1998, 181–209.Google Scholar

OECD, International Investment and Multinational Enterprises: Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, Paris: OECD, 1976.Google Scholar

Oliver, Christine, “Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes,” Academy of Management Review 19, 1 (1991), 145–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olsen, Johan, and Peters, Guy (eds.), Lessons from Experience: Experiential Learning from Administrative Reform in Eight Democracies, Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, 1996.

Olson, Wallace, The Accounting Profession: Years of Trial 1963–1980, New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, 1982.Google Scholar

Ordelheide, Dieter, “The True and Fair View: A European and German Perspective,” European Accounting Review 2 (1993), 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ortiz Mena, Antonio, “Forum-shopping in International Trade: A Tradeoff Between Scope and Flexibility? Evidence from the Mexican Case,” paper presented at the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September 1–4, 2005.

Ostrom, Elinor, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owen, Roger, “Egypt in the World Depression,” in Brown, Ian (ed.), The Economics of Africa and Asia in the Inter-War Depression, London and New York: Routledge, 1989, 137–151.Google Scholar

Owen, RogerLord Cromer: Victorian Imperialist, Edwardian Proconsul, Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Owen, Roger, and Pamuk, Sevket, A History of Middle East Economies in the Twentieth Century, London: I. B. Tauris, 1998.Google Scholar

Oye, Kenneth A. (ed.), Cooperation Under Anarchy, Princeton University Press, 1986.

Pagano, Marco, Roell, Ailsa, and Zechner, Josef, “The Geography of Equity Listing: Why do Companies List Abroad?,” Journal of Finance 57 (2002), 2651–2694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peel, Michael, “Accord Puts Common World Standards Drive Back on Track,”Financial Times, November 19, 1999.Google Scholar

David, Paul“Case of the Dog that Didn't Bark,” Financial Times, January 6, 2000, 16.Google Scholar

Pekkanen, Saadia M., Solís, Mireya, and Katada, Saori N., “Trading Gains for Control: International Trade Forums and Japanese Economic Diplomacy,” International Studies Quarterly 51 (2007), 945–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perry, Michelle, “Financial Reporting: Convergence – International Peacekeeping,” Accountancy 136 (2005), 74.Google Scholar

Peters, Guy, Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism, 3rd edn., New York: Continuum International Publishing, 2012.Google Scholar

Peters, Guy, Pierre, Jon, and King, Desmond, “The Politics of Path Dependence: Political Conflict in Historical Institutionalism,” Journal of Politics 67, 4 (November 2005), 1275–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, “The Dispute Settlement System of the World Trade Organization and the GATT Dispute Settlement System Since 1948,” Common Market Law Review 31 (1994), 1157–1244.Google Scholar

Pfaffenzeller, Stephan, Newbold, Paul, and Rayner, Anthony, “A Short Note on Updating the Grilli and Yang Commodity Price Index,” World Bank Economic Review 21, 1 (2007), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, Paul, “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics,” American Political Science Review 94 (2000), 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, Paul“The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis,” Comparative Political Studies 29, 2 (April 1996), 123–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, PaulPolitics in Time: History, Institutions, and Political Analysis, Princeton University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, Paul, and Skocpol, Theda, “Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science,” in Katznelson, Ira and Milner, Helen (eds.), Political Science: State of the Discipline, New York: W. W. Norton, 2002, 693–721.Google Scholar

Plutarch, , Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans, trans. Dryden, John, ed. Clough, A. H., University of Adelaide Library, .

Pollack, Mark A., “Creeping Competence: The Expanding Agenda of the European Community,” Journal of Public Policy 14, 2 (April/June 1994), 95–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pollack, Mark A.“Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community,” International Organization 51, 1 (Winter 1997), 99–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pollack, Mark A.“The End of Creeping Competence? EU Policy-Making Since Maastricht,” Journal of Common Market Studies 38, 3 (September 2000), 519–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poulsen, Lauge Skovgaard, and Aisbett, Emman, “When the Claim Hits: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Bounded Rationality Learning,” World Politics 65, 2 (April 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prebisch, Raúl, “The Developing Countries in GATT,” in Proceedings of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva, 23 March–16 June 1964, vol. 5, Financing & Indivisibles; Institutional Arrangements, New York: United Nations, 1964, 430–469.Google Scholar

Rahman, Sheikh, “International Accounting Regulation by the United Nations: A Power Perspective,” Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal 11 (1999), 593–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raustiala, Kal, and Victor, David G., “The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources,” International Organization 58, 2 (Spring 2004), 277–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reinhardt, Eric R., Posturing Parliaments: Ratification, Uncertainty, and International Bargaining, chapter 4, Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, December 11, 1996.Google Scholar

Reuters, “US Trade Plan Meets Resistance,” Globe and Mail, July 29, 1982.

Richter, J. H., “Trends in International Trade: Review Article,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 73, 4 (November 1959), 576–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riding, Alan, “3d World Stake in Trade Talks,” New York Times, September 15, 1986, D10.

Riker, William, “Implications for the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions,” American Political Science Review 74 (1980), 432–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodrik, Dani, The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy, New York: W. W. Norton, 2011.Google Scholar

Rose, Andrew K., “Do We Really Know that the WTO Increases Trade?,”American Economic Review 94, 1 (2004), 98–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothstein, Robert L., Global Bargaining: UNCTAD and the Quest for a New International Economic Order, Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Rothstein, Robert L.“Regime-Creation by a Coalition of the Weak: Lessons from the NIEO and the Integrated Program for Commodities,” International Studies Quarterly 28 (1984), 307–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, Seymore, “Multinational Enterprises and National Sovereignty: A Skeptic's Analysis,” Law and Policy in International Business 3 (1971), 1–41.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard, “International Regimes, Transactions and Change,” International Organization 36, 2 (Spring 1982), 195–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sergei, Sarkissian, and Schill, Michael, “The Overseas Listing Decision,” Review of Financial Studies 17 (2004), 769–809.Google Scholar

Sauvé, Pierre, “Assessing the General Agreement on Trade in Services: Half-Full or Half-Empty?,” Journal of World Trade 29, 4 (1995), 125–145.Google Scholar

Schimmelfennig, Frank, “International Socialization in Central and Eastern Europe: A Strategic Perspective,” paper presented at the International Studies Association (ISA) Convention, Chicago, 2001.

Scott, Richard, “The Adolescence of Institutional Theory,” Administrative Science Quarterly 32, 4 (December 1987), 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seaberry, Jane, “Brock to Push for Pacts on Trade in Services,” Washington Post, June 9, 1981, D6.

Sebenius, James, “Negotiation Arithmetic: Adding and Subtracting Issues and Parties,” International Organization 37, 2 (Spring 1983), 281–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selznick, Philip, Leadership in Administration, New York: Harper & Row, 1957.Google Scholar

Selznick, PhilipTVA and the Grass Roots, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1949.Google Scholar

Severino, Rodolfo C., “Regional Integration in Europe and in Asia: The Future of ASEAN Economic Integration,” Asia Europe Journal 1 (2003), 475–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shanks, Cheryl, Jacobson, Harold K., and Kaplan, Jeffrey H., “Inertia and Change in the Constellation of International Governmental Organizations, 1981–1992,” International Organization 50, 4 (Autumn 1996), 593–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth, “Institutional Equilibrium and Equilibrium Institutions,” in Weisberg, Herbert (ed.), Political Science: The Science of Politics, New York: Agathon, 1986, 51–81.Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth“Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach,” Journal of Theoretical Politics 1, 2 (April 1989), 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shonfield, Andrew, “Trade as a Tool of Development: The Issues at Geneva,” International Affairs 40, 2 (April 1964), 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, Herbert, Models of Bounded Rationality, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Simon, HerbertModels of Man, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1957.Google Scholar

Snape, Richard H., “Reaching Effective Agreements Covering Services,” in Krueger, Anne O. (ed.), The WTO as an International Organization, University of Chicago Press, 1998, 279–296.Google Scholar

Spruyt, Hendrik, The Sovereign State and its Competitors: An Analysis of Systems Change, Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Stamp, E., “Multinational Companies are Misguided in Opposing UN Disclosure Rules,” Financial Times, 10 May 1978, 8.Google Scholar

Stein, Arthur A., Why Nations Cooperate: Circumstance and Choice in International Relations, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Steinberg, Richard H., “In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO,” International Organization 56, 2 (Spring 2002), 339–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, Robert, and Hoekman, Bernard, “The Codes Approach,” in Finger, J. Michael and Olechowskik, Andrzej (eds.), The Uruguay Round: A Handbook on the Multilateral Trade Negotiations, Washington, DC: World Bank, 1987, 59–66.Google Scholar

Stokey, Edith, and Zeckhauser, Richard, A Primer for Policy Analysis, New York: W. W. Norton, 1978.Google Scholar

Stone, Randall, Controlling Institutions: International Organizations and the Global Economy, Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Streeck, Wolfgang, and Thelen, Kathleen, “Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies,” in Streeck, and Thelen, (eds.), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, Oxford University Press, 2005, 1–39.Google Scholar

Street, Donna, and Shaughnessy, Kimberly, “The Evolution of the G4+1 and its Impact on International Harmonization of Accounting Standards,” Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 7 (1998), 131–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, A. J. P., “International Relations,” in Hinsley, F. H. (ed.), The New Cambridge Modern History 11, Cambridge University Press, 1962, 542–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thelen, Kathleen, “How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis,” in Mahoney, James and Rueschmeyer, Dietrich (eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, Cambridge University Press, 2003, 305–336.Google Scholar

Thelen, KathleenHow Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the US, and Japan, Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thorell, Per, and Whittington, Geoffrey, “The Harmonization of Accounting within the European Union,” European Accounting Review 3 (1994), 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thornton, A. P., “Rivalries in the Mediterranean, the Middle East and Egypt,” in Hinsley, F. H. (ed.), The New Cambridge Modern History 11, Cambridge University Press, 1962, 568–569.Google Scholar

Tignor, Robert, Modernization and British Rule in Egypt, 1882–1914, Princeton University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Timmermans, G., La Réforme Judiciaire en Egypt et les Capitulations, Paris: Gand, 1875.Google Scholar

Toledano, Ehud, State and Society in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Egypt, Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Tomz, Michael, Goldstein, Judith L., and Rivers, Douglas, “Do We Really Know that the WTO Increases Trade? Comment,” American Economic Review 97, 5 (2007), 2005–2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trachtman, Joel, “Addressing Regulatory Divergence Through International Standards: Financial Services,” in Mattoo, Aaditya and Sauvé, Pierre (eds.), Domestic Regulation and Service Trade Liberalization, Washington, DC: World Bank, 2003, 27–41.Google Scholar

Trachtman, JoelThe Economic Structure of International Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trebilcock, Michael J., and Howse, Robert, The Regulation of International Trade, 3rd edn., London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar

Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel, “Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 4 (1991), 1039–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Beyond Conventional Wisdom in Development Policy: An Intellectual History of UNCTAD 1964–2004, New York: UNCTAD, 2004.Google Scholar

Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, DanielThe Role of Accounting Disclosure in the East Asian Financial Crisis, Geneva: UNCTAD, 1998.Google Scholar

United Nations, International Standards of Accounting and Reporting: Report of the Ad-hoc Intergovernmental Working Group of Experts on International Standards of Accounting and Reporting on its 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th sessions, New York: UN Commission on Transnational Corporations, Doc. E/C. 10/81, 1981.Google Scholar

Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel, “International Standards of Accounting and Reporting: Report of the Ad-hoc Intergovernmental Working Group of Experts on International Standards of Accounting and Reporting, New York: UN Commission on Transnational Corporations, Doc. E/C. 10/1982/8. Rev. 1, 1984.Google Scholar

Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel, “International Standards of Accounting and Reporting for Transnational Corporations: Report to the Secretary-General of the Group of Experts on International Standards of Accounting and Reporting, New York: UN Commission of Transnational Corporations, Doc. E/C. 10/33, 1977.Google Scholar

Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel, International Trade Statistics 1900–1960, MGT(62)12, May 1962, table XXIV. , consulted March 13, 2012.

Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, DanielThe Impact of Multinational Corporations on Development and on International Relations, New York: UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Doc. E/5500/Rev. 1 (ST/ESA/6), 1974.Google Scholar

Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel, UN ECOSOC Resolution 917 (XXXIV), August 3, 1962.

Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel UN General Assembly Resolution 1710 (XVI), December 19, 1961.

Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel UN General Assembly Resolution 1785 (XVII), December 8, 1962.

Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel UN General Assembly Resolution 1995 (XIX), December 30, 1964.

United States Department of State, Office of Investment Affairs, Current Status Report, Washington, DC: OIA, 1982.Google Scholar

United States House of Representatives, Committee on Energy and Commerce, Are Current Financial Accounting Standards Protecting Investors? Hearing before the Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade, and Consumer Protection of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, 107th Congress, 2nd Session, February 14, 2002, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2002.Google Scholar

United States House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services, The Enron Collapse, Impact on Investors and Capital Markets: Joint Hearing before the Subcommittee Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government Sponsored Enterprises and the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Financial Services, House of Representatives, 107th Congress, 1st Session, December 12, 2001, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2001.Google Scholar

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Annual Report, 1998.

SEC Division of Corporation Finance, Statistical Report, 1997.

Vabulas, Felicity, and Snidal, Duncan, “Organization without Delegation: Informal Intergovernmental Organizations (IIGOs) and the Spectrum of Intergovernmental Arrangements,” Review of International Organizations, forthcoming.

Van Hulle, Karel, “Harmonization of Accounting Standards in the EC: Is it the Beginning or is it the End?,” European Accounting Review 2 (1993), 387–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vatikiotis, P. J., The History of Modern Egypt, 4th edn., London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1991.Google Scholar

Vernon, Raymond, “International Trade Policy in the 1980s: Prospects and Problems,” International Studies Quarterly 26, 4 (December 1982), 483–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallander, Celeste A., “Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO After the Cold War,” International Organization 54, 4 (Autumn 2000), 705–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walton, Peter, “Harmonization of Accounting in France and Britain: Some Evidence,” Abacus 28 (1992), 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waltz, Kenneth N., Theory of International Politics, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979.Google Scholar

Weaver, Katherine, Hypocrisy Trap: The World Bank and the Poverty of Reform, Princeton University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weingast, Barry, “Rational-Choice Institutionalism,” in Katznelson, Ira and Milner, Helen (eds.), Political Science: State of the Discipline, New York: W. W. Norton, 2002, 660–692.Google Scholar

Wendt, Alexander, “Driving with the Rearview Mirror: On the Rational Science of Institutional Design,” International Organization 55, 4 (Autumn 2001), 1019–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Werle, Raymund, “Institutional Aspects of Standardization: Jurisdictional Conflicts and the Choice of Standardization Organizations,” Journal of European Public Policy 8, 3 (July 2001), 392–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weyland, Kurt, Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion: Social Sector Reform in Latin America, Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt,“Toward a New Theory of Institutional Change,” World Politics 60, 2 (January 2000), 281–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williamson, Oliver, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, New York: Free Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Wilcox, Clair, A Charter for World Trade, New York: Macmillan, 1949.Google Scholar

Wilson, Allister, “Harmonization: Is it Now or Never for Europe?,” Accountancy 114 (1994), 98.Google Scholar

Winham, Gilbert, “An Interpretive History of the Uruguay Round,” in Macrory, Patrick F. J., Appleton, Arthur Edmond, and Plummer, Michael G. (eds.), The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis, New York: Springer, 2005, vol. i, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winham, GilbertInternational Trade and the Tokyo Round Negotiations, Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Winham, Gilbert “The WTO and Multilateral Trade,” Economic Journal 21, 3 (1998), 349–368.Google Scholar

Wolf, Martin, “Two-Edged Sword: Demands of Developing Countries and the Trading System,” in Bhagwati, Jagdish N. and Ruggie, John Gerard (eds.), Power, Passions and Purpose: Prospects for North-South Negotiations, New York: Columbia University Press, 1984, 201–229.Google Scholar

Wolfensohn, James, Accounting and Society: Serving the Public Interest. Remarks to the World Congress of Accountants, Paris, October 26, 1997.

Wolff, Alan W., “The Larger Political and Economic Role of the Tokyo Round,” Law & Policy in International Business 12 (1980), 1–19.Google Scholar

Woolley, John T., “Using Media-Based Data in Studies of Politics,” American Journal of Political Science 44, 1 (January 2000), 156–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

World Bank, Financial Accounting, Reporting and Auditing Handbook, Washington, DC, 1995.Google Scholar

World Trade Organization, Doha WTO Ministerial Declaration November 2001, WR/MIN(01)/DEC/120. .

World Trade Organization, Guide to the Uruguay Round Agreements, Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1999.

Woolley, John T.,Implementation-Related Issues and Concerns Decision of November 14, 2001, WR/MIN(01)/17, November 20, 2001.

Woolley, John T.,Singapore Ministerial Declaration Adopted on 13 December 1996, WT/MIN(96)/DEC, para. 17, 1996.

Yarbrough, Beth V., and Yarbrough, Robert M., “Cooperation in the Liberalization of International Trade: After Hegemony, What?,” International Organization 41, 1 (Winter 1987), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, Oran R., The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay and Scale, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Zangl, Bernhard, “Judicialization Matters! A Comparison of Dispute Settlement Under GATT and the WTO,” International Studies Quarterly 52 (2008), 825–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zeiler, Thomas W., American Trade and Power in the 1960s, New York: Columbia University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Zorn, Dirk, Dobbin, Frank, Dierkes, Julian, and Kwok, Man-Shan, “The New Firm: Power and Sense-Making in the Construction of Shareholder Value,” Nordic Organization Studies 3 (2006), 41–68.Google Scholar

Zürn, Michael, and Checkel, Jeffrey T., “Getting Socialized to Build Bridges: Constructivism and Rationalism, Europe and the Nation-State,” International Organization 59, 4 (Fall 2005), 1045–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar