Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T17:33:51.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Plural Selves and Relational Identity: Intimacy and Privacy Online

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2009

Dean Cocking
Affiliation:
Senior Research Fellow/lecturer Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Canberra, Australia
John Weckert
Affiliation:
Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

With unprecedented global access, speed, and relative anonymity with respect to how one is able to present oneself to and interact with others, computer-mediated communication (hereafter CMC) contexts provide many new worlds through which we may express and develop our identities as persons and form relationships with others. Through text-based e-mail and chat-room style forums, or Web site and Web cam technology, we may present or even ‘showcase’ ourselves to others, and we may enter and contribute to all sorts of communities, such as hobby and mutual interest groups, and develop various sorts of relationships with others. Indeed, for many people, significant aspects of key roles and relationships in their professional, business, and even personal lives are now conducted online.

It makes sense then, to consider if these CMC contexts, where people are increasingly presenting themselves to and undertaking various activities and relationships with others, might tailor the content of these relationships and the self that is presented to others online in any notable ways. For many, opportunities to express and form relationships have been enormously increased by computer communication technology. But what sorts of identities and relationships are really possible online? How might our pursuit of values that constitute and regulate our ideals of personal identity and various significant relationships be sensitive to such communication environments?

It is clear that contextual features of the setting within which we express ourselves to others can significantly influence the content and nature of our communication.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cocking, D., and Kennett, J. 1998. Friendship and the self. Ethics, 108, 3, 502–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocking, D., and Kennett, J. 2000. Friendship and moral danger. Journal of Philosophy, 97, 5, 278–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocking, D., and Matthews, S. 2000. Unreal friends. Ethics and Information Technology, 2, 4, 223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P., and Friesen, W. V. 1975. Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial cues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., and Rosenberg, E. L. 1997. What the face reveals: Basic and applied studies of spontaneous expression using the facial action coding system (FACS). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. 1988. Freedom of the will and the concept of a person, in The importance of what we care about. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. 1980. Personal identity and the unity of agency: A Kantian response to Parfit. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 18, 2, 101–132.Google Scholar
Kupfer, J. 1987. Privacy, autonomy, and self-concept. American Philosophical Quarterly, 24, 81–89.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 1998. Concealment and exposure. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 27, 1, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rachels, J. 1975. Why privacy is important. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 4, 323–333.Google Scholar
Velleman, D. J. 2000. Well-being and time, in The possibility of practical reason. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 56–84.Google Scholar
Watson, G. 1982. Free agency, in Watson, G (Ed.), Free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 96–110.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×