Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, edited by Smith, Norman Kemp, second edition. Edinburgh: Nelson, 1947.

Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, edited by Coleman, Dorothy. Cambridge University Press, 2007.

A Dissertation on the Passions and The Natural History of Religion, edited by Beauchamp, Tom L.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007.

Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, edited by Selby-Bigge, L. A.; third edition, revised by Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.

Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, Oxford Philosophical Texts, edited by Beauchamp, Tom L.. OxfordUniversity Press, 1998.

Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, A Critical Edition, edited by Beauchamp, Tom L.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.

Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Oxford Philosophical Texts, edited by Beauchamp, Tom L.. Oxford University Press, 1999.

Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, A Critical Edition, edited by Beauchamp, Tom L.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.

Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding and Other Writings, edited by Buckle, Stephen. Cambridge University Press, 2007CrossRef

Essays Moral, Political, and Literary. edited by Millar, E. F.. rev. ed. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1987.

The History of England from the Invasion of Julius Caesar to the Revolution of 1688, 6 vols. Liberty Classics: Indianapolis, 1983.

The Letters of David Hume, edited by Greig, J. Y. T.. 2 vols. Oxford University Press, 1932.

New Letters of David Hume, edited by Kilbansky, R. and Mossner, E. C.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954.

“The Natural History of Religion.” In A Dissertation on the Passions and The Natural History of Religion, edited by Beauchamp, Tom L.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007.

A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by Selby-Bigge, L. A., second edition, revised by Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978. [This edition includes An Abstract of… A Treatise of Human Nature. Hume's Appendix is intact as he had printed it in Volume 3 in 1740. Textual notes (pp. 663–73) record Hume's post-publication corrections and additions to the text.]

A Treatise of Human Nature, Oxford Philosophical Texts, edited by Norton, David Fate and Norton, Mary. Oxford University Press, 2000; reprinted with corrections beginning in 2001. [This text of the Treatise is the same as that of the Oxford Critical Edition: see the next item below. It incorporates into the text of Book 1 the insertions Hume listed in the Appendix to Book 3; also his post-publication manuscript amendments to Book 3. Changes are made to Hume's original published Treatise without any textual annotations. In addition to the Treatise the text includes An Abstract of… A Treatise of Human Nature. There is a 99-page interpretative Introduction by the editor, a glossary of difficult terms, and textual annotations including summaries of each part and section of the book (see pp. 421–2ff).]

A Treatise of Human Nature, A Critical Edition, edited by Norton, David Fate and Norton, Mary. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007. [Volume I presents a critical edition of the text of the Treatise and Abstract as described in the previous item, as well as A Letter from a Gentleman to his Friend in Edinburgh – Hume's defense of his book against criticisms made when he applied for the Edinburgh Chair of Moral Philosophy in 1745. The index for this volume is contained in volume 2. Volume 2 contains an account of the principles used in creating this critical edition of Hume's Treatise, “A Historical Account of A Treatise of Human Nature from its Beginnings to the Time of Hume's Death,” and detailed annotations on the text meant to illuminate rather than interpret it (see pp. 685ff.).]

A Treatise of Human Nature (abridged), edited by Wright, John P., Fuller, Gary and Stecker, Robert. London: J. M. Dent, 2003. [Contains a chronology of Hume's life and times, as well as comments on the Treatise by philosophical critics from Hume's own day to our own.]

Addison, Joseph. The Spectator, Vol. III, edited by Bond, Donald F.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Aristotle. “De Memoria et Reminiscentia.” In The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by McKeon, Richard. New York: Random House, 1941: 607–17, 449b–53b.

Aristotle, . Nichomachean Ethics, translated by Rackham, H.. London: W. Heinemann, 1968.Google Scholar

Bacon, Francis. The New Organon, edited by Jardine, Lisa and Silverthorne, Michael. Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bayle, Pierre. The Dictionary Historical and Critical of Mr. Peter Bayle, 5 vols., edited and translated by Maizeau, Pierre Des, 2nd edn. London, 1735.Google Scholar

Bayle, Pierre. Historical and Critical Dictionary: Selections, edited by Popkin, Richard H. and Brush, Craig. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965.Google Scholar

Baxter, Andrew. An Enquiry into the Nature of the Human Soul. London, 1733.Google Scholar

Berkeley, George. An Essay towards a New Theory of Vision. In The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne, Vol. II, edited by Luce, A. A. and Jessop, T. E.. London: Nelson, 1949Google Scholar

Berkeley, George. A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. In The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne, Vol. II, edited by Luce, A. A. and Jessop, T. E.. London: Nelson, 1949.Google Scholar

Butler, Joseph. Analogy of Religion, Natural and Revealed, to the Constitution and Course of nature, second edition. London, 1736.Google Scholar

Butler, Joseph. Analogy of Religion, Natural and Revealed, to the Constitution and Course of Nature. In The Works of Joseph Butler, edited by Gladstone, W. E., 3 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1896.Google Scholar

Butler, Joseph. Fifteen Sermons Preached at the Rolls Chapel, in The Works of Joseph Butler, edited by Gladstone, W. E.; with a new introduction by Frey, R. G., 3 vols. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Chambers, Ephraim. Cyclopædia; or, An Universal Dictionary of Arts and Sciences…, 2 vols. London, 1728.Google Scholar

Cheyne, George. The English Malady: or a Treatise of Nervous Disease of all Kinds, as Spleen, Vapours, Lowness of Spirits, Hypochondriacal, and Hysterical Distempers & c. London and Bath, 1733.Google Scholar

Cheyne, George. Philosophical Principles of Natural Religion, 5th edn. London, 1736.Google Scholar

Cicero, . Academica. In Denatura deorum. Academica, translated by Rackham, H.. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1933.Google Scholar

Cicero, . Tusculan Disputations. translated by King, J. E.. London: Heinemann, 1966.Google Scholar

Clarke, Samuel. A Discourse Concerning the Unchangeable Obligations of Natural Religion, and the Truth and Certainty of the Christian Revelation, 3rd edn. London, 1711.Google Scholar

Clarke, Samuel. Sermons on Several Subjects, 7th ed., 11 vols. London, 1749.Google Scholar

Clarke, Samuel. A Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God and Other Writings, edited by Vailati, E.. Cambridge University Press, 1998. [first published 1705].Google Scholar

Descartes, Rene. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, translated by Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, Murdoch, Dugald, and Kenny, Anthony, 3 vols. Cambridge University Press. 1985–1991.Google Scholar

Gay, John. “Preliminary Dissertation Concerning the Virtue and Morality,” prefaced to William King's An Essay on the Origin of Evil. London, 1731.Google Scholar

Galilei, Galileo. The Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo, edited and translated by Drake, Stillman. New York: Anchor Books, 1957.Google Scholar

Haller, Albrecht. First Lines of Physiology, edited by Cullen, Wm.. Edinburgh, 1786.Google Scholar

Hartley, David. Observations on Man, his Frame, his Duty, and his Expectations. London, 1749.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, or The Matter, Forme, & Power of a Common-wealth Ecclesiastical and Civill, edited by Macpherson, C. B.. London: Penguin, 1968.Google Scholar

Hutcheson, Francis. Letters between the Late Mr. Gilbert, and Mr. Hutchinson on the True Foundation of Virtue or Moral Goodness. London, 1735.Google Scholar

Hutcheson, Francis. An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue, 3rd edn., corrected. London, 1729.Google Scholar

Hutcheson, Francis. An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue, edited by Leidhold, Wolfgang. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2004.Google Scholar

Hutcheson, Francis. An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections, with Illustrations on the Moral Sense, edited by Garrett, Aaron. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2002.Google Scholar

Hutcheson, Francis. Philosophiae Moralis Institutio Compendiaria, with A Short Introduction to Moral Philosophy, edited with an Introduction by Turco, Luigi. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2008.Google Scholar

Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, edited by Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government, edited by Laslett, Peter. Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malebranche, Nicolas. Recherche de la Vérité, 3 vols., edited by Rodis-Lewis, G., in Oeuvres Complètes de Malebranche. Paris: Vrin, 1963.Google Scholar

Malebranche, Nicolas. The Search After Truth, translated by Lennon, Thomas M. and Olscamp, Paul J.. Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Mandeville, Bernard. A Treatise of the Hypochondriak and Hysterick Passions, Vulgarly call'd the HYPO in MEN and VAPOURS in WOMEN. London, 1711.Google Scholar

Mandeville, Bernard. Treatise of the Hypochondriack and Hysterick Diseases. In Three Dialogues, 3rd edn. London, 1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mandeville, Bernard. The Fable of the Bees, edited by Kaye, F. B.. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac. Opticks or a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections & Colours of Light, based on the Fourth Edition London, 1730. New York: Dover, 1952.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac. Sir Isaac Newton's Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and his System of the World, translated by Motte, Andrew (1729), revised by Cajori, Florian, 2 vols. New York: Greenwood Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Plato, . Republic, translated by Griffith, Tom. Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Ramsay, Andrew Michael. Les Voyages de Cyrus, 2 vols. Amsterdam, 1732.Google Scholar

Ramsay, Andrew Michael. “Le Psychomètre ou Réflexions sur les différens caracteres de l'Esprit par un Mylord Anglois.” Mémoires pour l'Histoire des Sciences & des beaux Arts, April, 1735.Google Scholar

Ramsay, Andrew Michael. Philosophical Principles of Natural and Revealed Religion…, 2 vols. Glasgow: Foulis, 1748–9.Google Scholar

Empiricus, Sextus. Outlines of Pyrrhonism, Book I. In Sextus Empiricus, 4 vols., translated by Bury, R. G.. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper, Third Earl of Shaftesbury. Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times, 3 vols. London, 1732; reprint, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2001.Google Scholar

Voltaire, . Letters Concerning the English Nation, edited by Cronk, Nicholas. Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Wollaston, William. Religion of Nature Delineated. London, 1724.Google Scholar

Beattie, James. An Essay on the Nature and Immutability of Truth: In Opposition to Sophistry and Scepticism (1770); reprinted New York: Garland Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy. A Fragment on Government (1776). In The Works of Jeremy Bentham, edited by Bowring, John, vols. 1–10. New York: Russell and Russell, 1962, Vol. I.Google Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy. The Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham, edited by Fuller, Catherine. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000, Vol. XI.Google Scholar

Brown, Thomas. Observations on the Nature and Tendency of the Doctrine of Mr. Hume Concerning the Relation of Cause and Effect (1805); reprinted in James Fieser, Early Responses to Hume, Vol. IV (see below).

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason (1781); translated by Smith, Norman Kemp. London: Macmillan, 1933.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, edited and translated by Gregor, Mary. Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science (1783), second edition, edited and translated by Hatfield, Gary. CambridgeUniversity Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Oswald, James. An Appeal to Common Sense on the Behalf of Religion, 2 vols. (1766–72). Reprinted in Fieser, James, Early Responses to Hume, Vol. IV (see below).

Reid, Thomas. Essays on the Active Powers of the Human Mind (1788), edited by Brody, Baruch. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Reid, Thomas. An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense (1764), edited by Brookes, Derek R.. Edinburgh University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Reid, Thomas. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man (1785), edited by Brookes, Dereck R.. Edinburgh University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Smith, Adam. The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759), edited by Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L.. Oxford University Press, 1999–2000.Google Scholar

A collection of early criticisms of Hume's writings, including the contemporary reviews of the Treatise of Human Nature, has been assembled in Fieser, James (ed.), Early Responses to Hume, 4 vols. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1999–2000.

Ainslie, Donald. “Scepticism about Persons in Book II of Hume's Treatise.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 37 (1999): 469–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, Henry E. “Hume's Philosophical Insouciance: A Reading of Treatise 1.4.7.” Hume Studies 31 (2005): 317–46.Google Scholar

Anderson, Robert F.Hume's First Principles. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Anderson, Robert F. “The Location, Extension, Shape, and Size of Hume's Perceptions.” In Hume: A Re-evaluation, edited by Livingston, Donald W. and King, James T.. New York: Fordham University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Ardal, Pall. Passion and Value in Hume's Treatise. Edinburgh University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Atwood, Margaret. Negotiating with the Dead. Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Baier, Annette. A Progress of Sentiments: Reflections on Hume's Treatise. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Baier, Annette. Death and Character: Further Reflections on Hume. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Baillie, James. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Hume on Morality. Routledge: London, 2000.Google Scholar

Barfoot, M. “Hume and the Culture of Science in the Early Eighteenth Century.” In Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment, edited by Stewart, M. A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990, 151–90.Google Scholar

Baxter, Donald. “Identity, Continued Existence, and the External World.” In The Blackwell Guide to Hume's Treatise, edited by Traiger, Saul. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006, 114–32.Google Scholar

Baxter, Donald. Time and Identity in the Treatise. New York: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar

Beebee, Helen. Hume on Causation. London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar

Beebee, Helen. “Does Anything Hold the World Together?” Synthese 149 (2006): 509–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, Martin. “Sceptical Doubts Concerning Hume's Causal Realism.” In The New Hume Debate, 2nd edn., edited by Read, Rupert and Richman, Kenneth. London: Routledge, 2007, 122–37.Google Scholar

Bell, Martin and McGinn, Marie. “Naturalism and Scepticism.” Philosophy 65 (1990): 399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackburn, Simon. Spreading the Word. Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Blackburn, Simon. “Hume and Thick Connexions.” In The New Hume Debate, edited by Read, R. and Richman, K., revised edition. Routledge: London, 2007, 100–12.Google Scholar

Brand, Walter. Hume's Theory of Moral Judgment: A Study in the Unity of A Treatise of Human Nature. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broadie, A. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRef

Broughton, Janet. “Hume's Skepticism about Causal Inferences.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64 (1983), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broughton, Janet. “Impressions and Ideas.” In The Blackwell Guide to Hume's Treatise, edited by Traiger, Saul, Oxford: Blackwell, 2006, 43–58.Google Scholar

Buckle, Stephen. Hume's Enlightenment Tract: The Unity and Purpose of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Burton, John Hill. Life and Correspondence of David Hume, 2 vols. Edinburgh, 1846.Google Scholar

Cohon, Rachel. “Hume's Difficulty with the Virtue of Honesty.” Hume Studies 21 (1997): 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohon, Rachel. “Hume's Artificial and Natural Virtues.” In The Blackwell Guide to Hume's Treatise, edited by Traiger, Saul. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006, 256–275.Google Scholar

Cohon, Rachel and Owen, David. “Representation, Reason and Motivation.” Manuscrito 20 (1997), 47–76.Google Scholar

Coventry, Angela. Hume's Theory of Causation: A Quasi-Realist Interpretation. London: Continuum, 2006.Google Scholar

Craig, Edward. “Hume on Causality: Projectivist and Realist.” In The New Hume Debate, 2nd edn., edited by Read, Rupert and Richman, Kenneth. London: Routledge, 2007, 113–21.Google Scholar

Darwall, Stephen. “Hume and the Invention of Utilitarianism.” In Hume and Hume's Connexions, edited by Stewart, M. A. and Wright, John P.. Edinburgh University Press, 1994, 58–82.Google Scholar

Dicker, George. Hume's Epistemology and Metaphysics: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar

Downing, Lisa. “Occasionalism and Strict Mechanism: Malebranche, Berkeley, Fontenelle.” In Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter, and Metaphysics, edited by Mercer, C. and O'Neill, E.. Oxford University Press, 2005, 206–30.Google Scholar

Emerson, Roger. “The ‘Affair’ at Edinburgh and the ‘Project’ at Glasgow.” In Hume and Hume's Connexions, edited by Stewart, M. A. and Wright, John P.. Edinburgh University Press, 1994: 1–22.Google Scholar

Falkenstein, Lorne. “Space and Time.” In The Blackwell Guide to Hume's Treatise of Human Nature, edited by Traiger, Saul. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006: 59–76.Google Scholar

Fogelin, Robert. Hume's Skepticism in the Treatise of Human Nature. London: Routledge, 1985.Google Scholar

Fogelin, Robert. “Hume's Scepticism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hume, edited by Norton, David. Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Frasca-Spada, Marina. Space and the Self in Hume's Treatise. Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Frasca-Spada, Marina. “Simple Perceptions in Hume's Treatise.” In New Essays on David Hume, edited by Ronchetti, Emanuele and Mazza, Emilio. Milan: FrancoAngeli, 2007, 37–54.Google Scholar

Frasca-Spada, Marina and Kail, Peter (ed.). Impressions of Hume. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005.CrossRef

Garrett, Don. Cognition and Commitment in Hume's Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Garrett, Don. “A Small Tincture of Pyrrhonism: Skepticism and Naturalism in Hume's Science of Man.” In Pyrrhonian Skepticism, edited by Sinnott-Armstrong, W.. Oxford University Press, 2004, 68–98.Google Scholar

Garrett, Don. “Hume's Conclusions in ‘Conclusions in Conclusion of this Book’.” In The Blackwell Guide to Hume's Treatise, edited by Traiger, Saul. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006, 151–76.Google Scholar

Gaskin, J. C. A.Hume's Philosophy of Religion, 2nd edn., New York: Macmillan, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gay, Peter. The Enlightenment: an Interpretation. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1973.Google Scholar

Gill, Michael B. “Nature and Association in the Moral Theory of Francis Hutcheson.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (July 1995): 23–48.Google Scholar

Gill, Michael B. “Hume's Progressive View of Human Nature.” Hume Studies 26 (2000): 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gill, Michael B.The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics. Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haakonssen, Knud. The Science of a Legislator: the Natural Jursiprudence of David Hume and Adam Smith. Cambridge University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacking, Ian. “Hume's Species of Probability.” Philosophical Studies 33 (1978): 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacking, Ian. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hakkarainen, Jani. Hume's Scepticism and Realism. Tampere, Finland: Bookshop Tampere, 2007.Google Scholar

Harris, James. “Hume's Reconciling Project.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2003): 451–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, James. “Answering Bayle's Question: Religious Belief in the Moral Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment.” In Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, edited by Garber, Daniel and Nadler, Steven. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003, 229–53.Google Scholar

Harris, James. Of Liberty and Necessity: The Free Will Debate in Eighteenth-century British Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, James. “Hume's Four Essays on Human Happiness and their Place in the Move from Morals to Politics.” In New Essays on David Hume, edited by Ronchetti, E. and Mazza, E.. Milan: FrancoAngeli, 2007, 223–36.Google Scholar

Herdt, Jennifer. Religion and Faction in Hume's Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Hurlbutt, Robert. Hume, Newton, and the Design Argument. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Jacob, Margaret. The Radical Enlightenment: Pantheists, Freemasons, and Republicans. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1981.Google Scholar

Jacquette, Dale. David Hume's Critique of Infinity. Leiden-Boston-Köln: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar

James, William. Pragmatism. London: Longmans, 1925.Google Scholar

Jones, Peter. Hume's Sentiments: Their Ciceronian and French Context. Edinburgh University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Jones, Peter (ed.). The Reception of David Hume in Europe. London: Continuum, 2005.Google Scholar

Kail, Peter. “Hutcheson's Moral Sense: Skepticism, Realism, and Secondary Qualities.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 18 (2001): 57–77.Google Scholar

Kail, Peter. Projection and Realism in Hume's Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kail, Peter. “Leibniz's Dog and Humean Reason.” In New Essays on David Hume, edited by Ronchetti, Emanuele and Mazza, Emilio. Milan: FrancoAngeli, 2007: 65–80.Google Scholar

Kail, Peter. “How to Understand Hume's Realism.” In The New Hume Debate, second edition, edited by Read, Rupert and Richman, Kenneth. London: Routledge, 2007, 253–69.Google Scholar

Kemp, Catherine. “Contrariety in Hume.” In New Essays on David Hume, edited by Ronchetti, Emanuele and Mazza, Emilio. Milan: FrancoAngeli, 2007, 55–64.Google Scholar

Smith, Kemp, Norman; see Smith, Norman Kemp.

Kozanecki, Tadeusz. “Dawida Hume'a Nieznane Listy W Zbiorach Muzeum Czartoryskich (Polska).” Archiwum Historii Filozofii Spolecznej 9 (1963): 127–41.Google Scholar

Kuehn, Manfred. “Kant's Critique of Hume's Theory of Faith.” In Hume and Hume's Connexions, edited by Stewart, M. A. and Wright, John P.. Edinburgh University Press, 1994, 239–55.Google Scholar

Laird, John. Hume's Philosophy of Human Nature. London: Methuen, 1932.Google Scholar

Latimer, J.Annals of Bristol in the Eighteenth Century. Bristol, 1893.Google Scholar

Livingston, Donald. Philosophical Melancholy and Delirium: Hume's Pathology of Philosophy. University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Loeb, Louis. Stability and Justification in Hume's Treatise. Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mazza, Emilio. “In and Out of the Well: Flux and Reflux of Scepticism and Nature.” In New Essays on David Hume, edited by Ronchetti, Emanuele and Mazza, Emilio. Milan: FrancoAngeli, 2007, 101–132.Google Scholar

McCosh, James. The Scottish Philosophy. New York, 1885.Google Scholar

McCracken, Charles. Malebranche and British Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.Google Scholar

McIntyre, Jane. “Personal Identity and the Passions.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 27 (1989): 545–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McIntyre, Jane. “Character: A Humean Account.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (1990): 193–205.Google Scholar

Millican, Peter. “Hume's Sceptical Doubts Concerning Induction.” In Reading Hume on Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002, 107–74.Google Scholar

Millican, Peter (ed.). Reading Hume on Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002.

Millican, Peter. “Hume's Determinism.” Read to the 32nd meeting of the Hume Society in Toronto in August, 2005, forthcoming.

Millican, Peter. “Against the New Hume.” In The New Hume Debate, 2nd edn., edited by Read, Rupert and Richman, Kenneth. London: Routledge, 2007, 211–52.Google Scholar

Moore, James. “Hume and Hutcheson.” In Hume and Hume's Connexions, edited by Stewart, M. A. and Wright, John P.. Edinburgh University Press, 1994, 23–57.Google Scholar

Moore, James. “The Eclectic Stoic, the Mitigated Skeptic.” In New Essays on David Hume, edited by Ronchetti, Emanuele and Mazza, Emilio. Milan: FrancoAngeli, 2007, 133–70.Google Scholar

Morris, William E. “Hume's Conclusions.” Philosophical Studies 99 (2000): 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mossner, Ernest C. “Hume at La Flèche, 1735: an Unpublished Letter.” The University of Texas Studies in English 37 (1958): 30–3.Google Scholar

Mossner, Ernest C.The Life of David Hume, revised edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Mource, H. O.Hume's Naturalism. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar

Mullett, Charles. The Letters of Doctor George Cheyne to Samuel Richardson (1733–1743). Columbia, Mo.: University of Missouri Press, 1943.Google Scholar

Noonan, Harold. Routledge Philosophical Guidebook to Hume on Knowledge. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar

Norton, David F.David Hume: Common Sense Moralist, Sceptical Metaphysician. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Norton, David F. “Hutcheson's Moral Realism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 23 (1985): 397–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norton, David F. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Hume. Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRef

Norton, David F. “Hume and Hutcheson: the Question of Influence.” In Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, Vol. II, edited by Garber, D. and Nadler, S.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005, 211–56.Google Scholar

Norton, David F. and Norton, Mary. The David Hume Library. Edinburgh Bibliographical Society, 1996.Google Scholar

Owen, David. Hume's Reason. Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Pears, David. Hume's System: An Examination of the First Book of his Treatise. Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Penelhum, Terence. God and Skepticism. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Penelhum, Terence. David Hume: An Introduction to his Philosophical System. West Lafayette, Ind.: Purdue University, 1992.Google Scholar

Penelhum, Terence. Themes in Hume: The Self, The Will, Religion. Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Popkin, Richard. “Hume and Kierkegaard.” Journal of Religion 31 (1951): 274–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popkin, Richard. “So Hume did Read Berkeley.” Journal of Philosophy 61 (1964): 773–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, H. H.Hume's Theory of the External World. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1940.Google Scholar

Read, Rupert and Ken, Richman (eds.), The New Hume Debate, second edition. London: Routlege, 2007.Google Scholar

Rivers, Isabel. Reason, Grace, and Sentiment, II. Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ronchetti, Emanuele and Mazza, Emilio (eds.). New Essays on David Hume. Milan: FrancoAngeli, 2007.

Ross, Ian. “Hutcheson on Hume's Treatise: An Unnoticed Letter.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 4 (1966): 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, Ian. Lord Kames and the Scotland of his Day. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Russell, Paul. “Dudgeon, William.” In Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century British Philosophers, edited by Yolton, J. W., Price, J. V., and Stephens, J.. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Russell, Paul. “Butler's ‘Future State’ and Hume's ‘Guide to Life’.” Journal of the History of Philosophy. 17 (2004): 425–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, Paul. The Riddle of Hume's Treatise: Skepticism, Naturalism, and Irreligion. Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneewind, J. B.The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Sher, Richard B. “Professors of Virtue: The Edinburgh Chair.” In Studies in the History of the Scottish Enlightenment, edited by Stewart, M. A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990: 87–126.Google Scholar

Singer, Ira. “Hume's Extreme Skepticism in Treatise I.IV.7.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25 (1995): 595–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Norman Kemp. “The Naturalism of Hume.” Mind, n.s. 14 (1905): 149–73, 335–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Norman Kemp. The Philosophy of David Hume: A Study of its Origins and its Central Doctrines. London: Macmillan, 1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stewart, M. A. “The Stoic Legacy in the Early Scottish Enlightenment.” In Atoms, ‘Pneuma’, and Tranquility; Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought, edited by Osler, M. J.. Cambridge University Press, 1991, 273–96.Google Scholar

Stewart, M. A. “An Early Fragment on Evil.” In Hume and Hume's Connexions, edited by Stewart, M. A. and Wright, John P.. Edinburgh University Press, 1994, 160–70.Google Scholar

Stewart, M. A.The Kirk and the Infidel. Lancaster, England, 1994.Google Scholar

Stewart, M. A. “The Dating of Hume's Manuscripts.” In The Scottish Enlightenment: Essays in Reinterpretation, edited by Wood, Paul. University of Rochester Press, 2000, 267–314.Google Scholar

Stewart, M. A. “Religion and Rational Theology.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment, edited by Broadie, A.. Cambridge University Press, 2003, 31–59.Google Scholar

Stewart, M. A. “Hume's Intellectual Development, –.” In Impressions of Hume edited by Frasca-Spada, M. and Kail, P. J. E.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, , –.

Stewart, M. A. and Moore, James. “William Smith (1698–1741) and the Dissenters' Book Trade.” Bulletin of the Presbyterian Historical Society of Ireland 22 (1993): 20–7.Google Scholar

Stewart, M. A. and Wright, John P. (eds.). Hume and Hume's Connexions. Edinburgh University Press. 1994.

Strawson, Galen. The Secret Connexion: Causation, Realism and David Hume. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Strawson, Galen. “David Hume: Objects and Power.” In The New Hume Debate, second edition, edited by Read, Rupert and Richman, Kenneth. London: Routledge, 2007, 31–51.Google Scholar

Strawson, Galen. The Evident Connexion: Mind, Self and David Hume, Oxford University Press, forthcoming.

Stroud, Barry. Hume. London: Routledge, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stroud, Barry. “Hume and the Idea of Causal Necessity.” Philosophical Studies 33 (1978) 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stroud, Barry. “‘Guiding and Staining’ the world with ‘sentiments’ and ‘phantasms’.” In The New Hume Debate, 2nd edn., edited by Read, Rupert and Richman, Kenneth. London: Routledge, 2007, 16–30.Google Scholar

Swain, Corliss. “Personal Identity.” In The Blackwell Guide to Hume's Treatise, edited by Traiger, Saul. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006, 132–50.Google Scholar

Taylor, Jacqueline. “Virtue and the Evaluation of Character.” In The Blackwell Guide to Hume's Treatise, edited by Traiger, Saul. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006, 276–95.Google Scholar

Traiger, Saul (ed.). The Blackwell Guide to Hume's Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.CrossRef

Turco, Luigi. “Sympathy and Moral Sense: 1725–1740.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 7 (1999): 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turco, Luigi. “Moral Sense and the Foundations of Morals.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment, edited by Broadie, A.. Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Turco, Luigi. “Le riposte di Hutcheson a Hume: Argomenti a favore e contro.” In Instruction and Amusement: Le ragioni dell'Illuminismo brittanico, edited by Ronchetti, Emanuele and Mazza, Emilio. Padua: Il Poligrafo, 2005.Google Scholar

Turco, Luigi. “Hutcheson and Hume in a Recent Polemic.” In New Essays on David Hume, edited by Ronchetti, Emanuele and Mazza, Emilio. Milan: FrancoAngeli, 2007, 171–98.Google Scholar

Underhill, Evelyn. Mysticism, 3rd edn. London: Methuen, 1912.Google Scholar

Warren, Howard C.A History of the Association Psychology. New York: Scribner's, 1921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, Bernard. Shame and Necessity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Winkler, Kenneth P. “The New Hume.” In The New Hume Debate, 2nd edn., edited by Read, Rupert and Richman, Kenneth. London: Routledge, 2007: 52–87.Google Scholar

Winkler, Kenneth P. “Hutcheson's Alleged Realism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 23 (1985): 179–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, John P.The Sceptical Realism of David Hume. Manchester & Minneapolis: Manchester University Press & University of Minnesota Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Wright, John P. “Hume's Academic Scepticism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (1986): 407–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, John P. “Association, Madness and the Measures of Probability in Locke and Hume.” In Psychology and Literature in the Eighteenth Century, edited by Fox, Christopher. New York: AMS Press, 1987, 103–27.Google Scholar

Wright, John P. “Metaphysics and Physiology: Mind, Body and the Animal Economy in Eighteenth-Century Scotland.” In Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment, edited by Stewart, M. A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990, 251–301.Google Scholar

Wright, John P. “Butler and Hume on Habit and Moral Character.” In Hume and Hume's Connexions, edited by Stewart, M. A. and Wright, J. P.. Edinburgh University Press, 1994, 105–18.Google Scholar

Wright, John P. “Hume, Descartes and the Materiality of the Soul.” In The Philosophical Canon in the 17th and 18th Centuries, edited by Rogers, G. A. J. and Tomaselli, Sylvana. Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 1996, 175–90.Google Scholar

Wright, John P. “Dr. George Cheyne, Chevalier Ramsay, and Hume's Letter to a Physician” Hume Studies (April 2003): 125–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, John P. “The Scientific Reception of Hume's Theory of Causation: Establishing the Positivist Interpretation.” In The Reception of David Hume in Europe, edited by Jones, Peter. London: Continuum, 2005, 327–47.Google Scholar

Wright, John P. “Reid's Answer to Hume's Scepticism: Turning Science into Common Sense.” In Mazza, E. and Ronchetti, E. (eds.), Instruction and Amusement: Le ragioni dell'Illuminismo brittanico. Padua: Il Poligrafo, 2005, 143–63.Google Scholar

Wright, John P. “The Treatise: Composition, Reception and Response.” In The Blackwell Guide to Hume's Treatise of Human Nature, edited by Traiger, Saul. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006, 5–25.Google Scholar

Wright, John P. “Hume's Causal Realism: Recovering a Traditional Interpretation.” In The New Hume Debate, 2nd edn., edited by Read, Rupert and Richman, Kenneth. London: Routledge, 2007, 88–99.Google Scholar

Wright, John P. “Kemp Smith and the Two Kinds of Naturalism in Hume's Philosophy.” In New Essays on David Hume, edited by Ronchetti, Emanuele and Mazza, Emilio. Milan: FrancoAngeli, 2007, 17–36.Google Scholar

Wright, John P. “Hume on the Origin of ‘Modern Honour’: a Study in Hume's Philosophical Development.” In Philosophy and Religion in Enlightenment Britain, edited by Savage, Ruth. Oxford University Press, forthcoming.

Yolton, John. “Hume's Abstract in the Bibliothèque Raisonée.” Journal of the History of Ideas 40 (1979): 157–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yolton, John. Perceptual Acquaintance from Descartes to Reid. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Yolton, John. Realism and Appearances: An Essay in Ontology. Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Articles on various topics in Hume's philosophy are to be found in many philosophical journals. These can be identified through the Philosopher's Index or the Humanities Index. Articles up to 1978 are listed by year and topic in Roland Hall, Fifty Years of Hume Scholarship: A Bibliographical Guide (Edinburgh University Press, 1978). These are supplemented by Hall's bibliographies which appear in the journal Hume Studies from 1977–85 and those of William Edward Morris from 1985 to the present.

Hume Studies, which began publication in 1975, is wholly devoted to articles on Hume's thought. There is unrestricted online access to articles in Hume Studies up to the last five years at www.humesociety.org/hs/browse.html Online access to articles in the most recent issues is restricted to members of the Hume Society: for details on membership (including student membership) go to www.humesociety.org/publications/index.html

The Hume Society sponsors an annual conference held at different locations throughout the globe, as well as at meetings of the three divisions of the American Philosophical Association. Periodic conferences on Hume are also sponsored by the British Society for the History of Philosophy, www.bshp.org.uk/ and the Eighteenth-Century Scottish Studies Society, www.ecsss.org/meetings.htm.