Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-frvt8 Total loading time: 1.402 Render date: 2022-10-02T04:56:42.821Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true
Human Rights in the Council of Europe and the European Union Human Rights in the Council of Europe and the European Union
Achievements, Trends and Challenges
Buy print or eBook[Opens in a new window]

Book contents

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2018

Steven Greer ,
Janneke Gerards  and
Rose Slowe
Steven Greer
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Janneke Gerards
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Rose Slowe
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Human Rights in the Council of Europe and the European Union
Achievements, Trends and Challenges
 , pp. 455 - 490
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Purchase

Buy Book

Buy print or eBook[Opens in a new window]

References

Affholder, S., updated by Lambrecht-Feigl, M., ‘The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities: European co-operation close to the citizen’ in Kleinsorge, T. (ed.), Council of Europe (CoE) (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2nd edn., 2015), pp. 170–82.Google Scholar
Alfredsson, G., ‘A frame an incomplete painting: comparison of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities with international standards and monitoring procedures’, International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 7 (2000), 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, P., and De Schutter, O. (eds.), Monitoring Fundamental Rights in the EU: The Contribution of the Fundamental Rights Agency (Oxford: Hart, 2005).Google Scholar
Alston, P., with Bustelo, M. R., and Heenan, J. (eds.), The EU and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Anagnostaras, G., ‘Balancing conflicting fundamental rights: the Sky Österreich paradigm’, European Law Review, 39 (2014), 111–24.Google Scholar
Anagnostou, D., ‘Introduction – untangling the domestic implementation of the European Court of Human Rights’ judgments’ in Anagnostou, D. (ed.), The European Court of Human Rights: Implementing Strasbourg’s Judgments on Domestic Policy (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013), pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anagnostou, D., ‘Politics, courts and society in the national implementation and practice of European Court of Human Rights case law’ in Anagnostou, D. (ed.), The European Court of Human Rights: Implementing Strasbourg’s Judgments on Domestic Policy (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013), pp. 211–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreadakis, S., ‘The European Convention on Human Rights, the EU and the UK: confronting a heresy: a reply to Andrew Williams’, European Journal of International Law, 24 (2013), 1187–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon, ‘Tribute to Rolv Ryssdal, ground-breaking reformer’, Human Rights Information Bulletin No. 50: The European Convention at 50 (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2000).Google Scholar
Arai-Takahashi, Y., The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2002).Google Scholar
Arai-Takahashi, Y., ‘The margin of appreciation doctrine: a theoretical analysis of Strasbourg’s variable geometry’ in Føllesdal, A., Peters, B., and Ulfstin, G. (eds.), Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 62–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnardóttir, O. M., Equality and Non-Discrimination under the European Convention on Human Rights (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003).Google Scholar
Arnardóttir, O. M., ‘Discrimination as a magnifying lens: scope and ambit under Article 14 and Protocol No. 12’ in Brems, E., and Gerards, J. (eds.), Shaping Rights in the ECHR; The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights (Cambridge Universtiy Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Ashiagbor, D., ‘Article 15: Freedom to Choose an Occupation’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 423–35.Google Scholar
Ashiagbor, D., ‘Article 29: Right of Access to Placement Services’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford, Hart, 2014), pp. 795–803.Google Scholar
Askola, H., ‘Article 5: Prohibition of Slavery and Forced Labour’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 101–19.Google Scholar
Avbelj, M., and Komárek, J., ‘Four visions of constitutional pluralism’, European Journal of Legal Studies, 2 (2008), 325–70.Google Scholar
Avbelj, M., and Komárek, J., ‘Introduction’ in Avbelj, M., and Komárek, J. (eds.), Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond (Oxford: Hart, 2012), pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Azoulai, L., ‘The Court of Justice and the social market economy: the emergence of an ideal and the conditions for its realisation’, Common Market Law Review, 45 (2008), 1335–55.Google Scholar
Babayev, R., ‘Private autonomy at Union level: On Article 16 CFREU and free movement rights’, Common Market Law Review, 53 (2016), 979–1005.Google Scholar
Badar, M. E., ‘Basic principles governing limitations on individual rights and freedoms in human rights instruments’, International Journal of Human Rights, 7 (2003), 63–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balducci, G., ‘The study of the EU promotion of human rights: the importance of international and internal factors’, GARNET Working Paper No. 61/08 (2008).
Barents, R., ‘The precedence of EU law from the perspective of constitutional pluralism’, European Constitutional Law Review, 5 (2009), 421–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, S., ‘The European Union in the Human Rights Council’ in Wouters, J., Bruyninckx, H., Basu, S., and Schunz, S. (eds.), The European Union and Multilateral Governance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), 86–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights: From Its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Bechev, D., and Nicolaïdis, K., ‘From policy to polity: can the EU’s special relations with its ‘neighbourhood’ be decentred?’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(3) (2010), 475–500.Google Scholar
Beijer, M., ‘Active guidance of (procedural) fundamental rights protection by the European Court of Justice’, Review of European Administrative Law, 8 (2015), 127–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beijer, M., The Limits of Fundamental Rights Protection in the EU (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J., ‘Reflections on continental European supreme courts’, Legal Studies, 24 (2004), 156–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, M., ‘Article 20: equality before the law’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 563–78.Google Scholar
Bell, M., ‘The principle of equal treatment: widening and deepening’ in Craig, P., and de Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford University Press, 2nd edn., 2011), pp. 611–39.Google Scholar
Bell, M., Schiek, D., and Waddington, L. (eds.), Cases, Materials and Text on National, Supranational and International Non-Discrimination Law (Oxford: Hart, 2007).Google Scholar
Bellamy, R., ‘The democratic legitimacy of international human rights conventions: political constitutionalism and the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Journal of International Law, 25 (2014), 1019–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, R., ‘The democratic legitimacy of international human rights conventions: political constitutionalism and the Hirst case’ in Føllesdal, A., Schaffer, J., and Ulfstein, G. (eds.), The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Regimes: Legal, Political and Philosophical Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 243–71.Google Scholar
Benelhocine, C., The European Social Charter (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2012).Google Scholar
Bernhardt, R., ‘The admissibility stage: the pros and cons of a certiorari procedure for individual applications’ in Wolfrum, R., and Deutsch, U. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights Overwhelmed by Applications: Problems and Possible Solutions – International Workshop, Heidleberg, 17–18 December 2007 (Berlin: Springer, 2007).Google Scholar
Besselink, L. F. M., ‘National and constitutional identity before and after Lisbon’, Utrecht Law Review, 6 (2010), 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besson, S., ‘The human rights competences in the EU – the state of the question after Lisbon’ in Kofler, G. et al. (eds.), Human Rights and Taxation in Europe and the World (IBFD, 2011), pp. 37–63.Google Scholar
Bjorge, E., Domestic Application of the ECHR: Courts as Faithful Trustees (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Björgvinsson, D., ‘The role of the ECtHR in the changing European human rights architecture’ in Mjöll Arnardóttir, O., and Buyse, A. (eds.), Shifting Centres of Gravity in Human Rights Protection: Rethinking relations between the ECHR, EU and national legal orders (London: Routledge, 2016), pp. 26–45.Google Scholar
Blankenburg, E., ‘Mobilization of the German Federal Constitutional Court’ in Rogowski and Gawron (eds.), Constitutional Courts, pp. 157–72.
Bobek, M., ‘The Court of Justice, the national courts and the spirit of cooperation: between Dichtung und Wahrheit’ in Lazowski, A., and Blockmans, S. (eds.), Research Handbook on EU Institutional Law (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2016), 353–78.Google Scholar
Bogg, A., ‘Article 31: Fair and Just Working Conditions’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 833–68.Google Scholar
Borreschmidt, N., ‘The EU’s Human Rights Promotion in China and Myanmar: Trading Rights for Might?’, EU Diplomacy Paper 5/2014 (Department of EU International Relations and Diplomacy Studies, 2014).
Bratza, N., ‘Living instrument or dead letter – the future of the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2014), 116–28.
Brems, E., ‘The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights’, Zeitschrift für Auslandisches Offentliches Recht und Volkrecht, 56 (1996), 240–314.Google Scholar
Brkan, M., ‘The unstoppable expansion of the EU Fundamental Right to Data Protection: little shop of horrors?’, Maastricht Journal, 23 (2016), 812–41.Google Scholar
Broberg, M., and Fenger, N., Preliminary References to the European Court of Justice (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Bruer, M., ‘Establishing common standards and securing the rule of law’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 639–70.Google Scholar
Brummer, K., ‘Enhancing intergovernmentalism: the Council of Europe and human rights’, International Journal of Human Rights, 14(2) (2010), 280–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brummer, K., ‘Imposing sanctions: the not so “normative power Europe”’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 14(2) (2009).Google Scholar
Brunnee, J., and Troope, S., Legitimacy and Legality in International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bünte, M., and Portela, C., ‘Myanmar: The beginning of reforms and the end of sanctions’, German Institute of Global and Area Studies Focus, 3 (2012), 1–7.Google Scholar
Burri, S., ‘The European Network of Legal Experts in the Field of Gender Equality’, European Anti-Discrimination Law Review, 6 (1993), 11–12.Google Scholar
Çali, B., Koch, A., and Bruch, N., ‘The legitimacy of human rights courts: a grounded interpretivist analysis of the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, 35 (2013), 955–84.Google Scholar
Callewaert, J., ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and European Union Law: a long way to harmony’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2009), 768–83.
Cameron, I., ‘The Court and the member states: procedural aspects’ in Føllesdal, A., Peters, B., and Ulfstein, G. (eds.), Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 25–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrasco, C. M., ‘The applicability of human rights instruments to European Union’s CSDP operations: framing the challenges’, Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto, 53 (2005), 53–80.Google Scholar
Carrera, S., and Atger, A. F., ‘L’affaire des Roms: A Challenge to the EU’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice’, CEPS Paper ‘Liberty and Security in Europe’ (2010).
Carruba, C., and Gabel, M., ‘Courts, compliance and the quest for legitimacy in international law’, Theoretical Inquiries in International Law, 14 (2013), 505–42.Google Scholar
Checkel, J. T., ‘International institutions and socialization in Europe: introduction and framework’ in Checkel, J. T. (ed.), International Institutions and Socialization in Europe (Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chetwynd, H., ‘The European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT)’ in Kleinsorge, T. (ed.), Council of Europe (CoE) (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2nd edn., 2015), pp. 127–41.Google Scholar
Choudry, S., ‘Article 9: Right to Marry and Right to Found a Family’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 269–90.Google Scholar
Christoffersen, J., ‘Individual and constitutional justice: can the power balance of adjudication be reversed?’ in Christoffersen, J., and Madsen, M. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 181–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchill, R. R., and Khaliq, U., ‘The collective complaints system of the European Social Charter: an effective mechanism for ensuring compliance with economic and social rights?’, European Journal of International Law, 15 (2004), 417–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claes, M., ‘The EU, its member states and their citizens’ in Leczykiewicz, D., and Weatherill, S. (eds.), The Involvement of EU Law in Private Law Relationships (Oxford: Hart, 2013), pp. 29–52.Google Scholar
Closa, C., ‘Reinforcing EU monitoring of the rule of law: normative arguments, institutional proposals and the procedural limitations’ in Closa, C., and Kochenov, D. (eds.), Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union (Cambridge University Press, 2016), pp. 15–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conant, L., ‘Compelling criteria? Human rights in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy, 21(5), 713–29.
Coppel, J., and O’Neill, A., ‘The European Court of Justice: taking rights seriously?’ Common Market Law Review, 29 (1992), 669–92.Google Scholar
Costa, J.-P., ‘On the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights’ judgments’, European Constitutional Law Review, 7 (2011), 173–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costello, C., ‘Article 33: Family and Professional Life’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 891–925.Google Scholar
Costello, C., ‘The Bosphorus Ruling of the European Court of Human Rights: fundamental rights and blurred boundaries in Europe’, Human Rights Law Review, 6 (2006), 87–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe, Highlights 2015 (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2016).
Craig, P., ‘Article 41: Right to Good Administration’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1069–98.Google Scholar
Craig, P., ‘The ECJ and ultra vires action: a conceptual analysis’, Common Market Law Review, 48 (2011), 395–437.Google Scholar
Craufurd Smith, R., ‘Article 22: Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Diversity’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 605–31.Google Scholar
Cruft, R., Matthew Liao, S., and Renzo, M., ‘The philosophical foundations of human rights: an overview’ in Cruft, R., Matthew Liao, S., and Renzo, M. (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullen, H., ‘The collective complaints system of the European Social Charter: interpretative methods of the European Committee of Social Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, 9 (2009), 61–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, D., and Mendes, J., ‘Article 42: Right of Access to Documents’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1099–119.Google Scholar
Curtin, D., and van Ooik, R., ‘The sting is always in the tail: the personal scope of application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’, Maastricht Journal, 8 (2001), 102–14.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, M., ‘Should social rights be included in interpretations of the convention by the European Court of Human Rights?’ European Journal of Social Security, 16 (2014), 252–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauses, M. A., ‘The protection of fundamental rights in the community legal order’, European Law Review, 10 (1985), 398–419.Google Scholar
Davies, G., ‘Legislative control of the European Court of Justice’, Common Market Law Review, 51(6) (2014), 1579–607.Google Scholar
De Búrca, G., ‘After the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: The Court of Justice as a human rights adjudicator?’ Maastricht Journal, 20 (2013), 168–84.Google Scholar
De Búrca, G., ‘Europe’s Raison d’Etre’, NYU Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 13-09, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2224310.
De Búrca, G., ‘The drafting of the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights’, European Law Review, 26 (2001), 126–38.Google Scholar
De Búrca, G., ‘The ECJ and the international legal order: a re-evaluation’ in de Búrca, G., and Weiler, J. (eds.), The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 105–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Búrca, G., ‘The evolution of EU human rights law’ in Craig, P., and de Búrca, G., The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford University Press, 2nd edn., 2011), pp. 465–97.Google Scholar
De Londras, F., ‘Dual functionality and the persistent frailty of the European Court of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2013), 38–46.
De Londras, F., and Dzehtsiarou, K., ‘Managing judicial innovation in the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, 15 (2015), 523–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Mol, M., ‘Kücükdeveci: Mangold revisited – horizontal effect of a general principle of EU law’, European Constitutional Law Review, 6 (2010), 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Schoutheete, P., ‘The European Council’ in Peterson, J., and Shackleton, M. (eds.), The Institutions of the European Union (Oxford University Press, 3rd edn., 2012), 43–67.Google Scholar
De Schutter, O., and De Jesus Butler, I., ‘Binding the EU to international human rights law’, Yearbook of European Law, 27 (2008), 277–320.Google Scholar
De Vries, S. A., ‘The protection of fundamental rights within Europe’s internal market after Lisbon – an endeavour for more harmony’ in de Vries, S. et al. (eds.), The Protection of Fundamental Rights in the EU after Lisbon (Oxford: Hart, 2013), pp. 59–94.Google Scholar
De Wet, E., The International Constitutional Order (Amsterdam: Vossiuspers UvA, 2005).Google Scholar
De Witte, B., ‘Article 53 – Level of Protection’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1523–38.Google Scholar
De Witte, B., ‘The legal status of the Charter: vital question or non-issue?’ Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative, 8 (2001), 81–9.Google Scholar
De Witte, B., ‘The past and future role of the European Court of Justice in the protection of human rights’ in Alston, P. et al. (eds.), The EU and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 859–97.Google Scholar
Den Boer, M., and Monar, J., ‘Keynote article: 11 September and the challenge of global terrorism to the EU as a security actor’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(1), 11–28.
Den Heijer, M., ‘Article 18: Right to Asylum’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 519–41.Google Scholar
Denza, E., ‘Article 46: Diplomatic and Consular Protection’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1177–95.Google Scholar
Devroe, W., and Van Cleynenbreughel, P., ‘The impact of general principles of EU law on private law relationships’ in Hartkamp, A. S. et al. (eds.), The Influence of EU Law on National Private Law (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2014), pp. 187–218.Google Scholar
Diggelmann, O., and Altwicker, T., ‘Is there something like a constitution of international law?’ Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 68 (2008), 623–50.Google Scholar
Dobner, P., and Loughlin, M. (eds.), The Twilight of Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörr, O., ‘Commissioner for Human Rights’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 296–313.Google Scholar
Dörr, O., ‘European Social Charter’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 507–41.Google Scholar
Dorssemont, F., ‘Article 12(1): Freedom of Assembly and of Association’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 341–77.Google Scholar
Dorssemont, F., ‘Article 27: Workers’ Right to Information and Consultation within the Undertaking’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 749–71.Google Scholar
Dossow, R., ‘Cultural Co-operation’ in Kleinsorge, T. (ed.), Council of Europe (CoE) (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2nd edn., 2015), pp. 194–201.Google Scholar
Dougan, M., ‘The Treaty of Lisbon 2007: winning minds, not hearts’, Common Market Law Review, 45 (2008), 617–703.Google Scholar
Douglas-Scott, , ‘The European Union and human rights after the Treaty of Lisbon’, Human Rights Law Review, 11 (2011), 645–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drzemczewski, A., ‘Core monitoring mechanisms and related activities’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 617–35Google Scholar
Drzemczewski, A., ‘Ensuring compatibility of domestic law with the European Convention on Human Rights prior to ratification: the Hungarian model’, Human Rights Law Journal, 16 (1995), 241–60.Google Scholar
Drzemczewski, A., ‘The Council of Europe’s co-operation and assistance programmes with central and eastern Europe in the human rights field: 1990 to September 1993’, Human Rights Law Journal, 14 (1993), 229–48.Google Scholar
Drzemczewski, A., ‘The European Human Rights Convention: a new court of human rights in Strasbourg as of November 1, 1998’, Washington and Lee Law Review, 55 (1998), 697–736.Google Scholar
Dupré, C., ‘Article 1: Human Dignity’ Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
Dürr, R., ‘The Venice Commission’ in Kleinsorge, T. (ed.), Council of Europe (CoE) (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2nd edn., 2015), pp. 156–69.Google Scholar
Dzehtsiarou, K., European Consensus and the Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzehtsiarou, K., and Greene, A., ‘Restructuring the European Court of Human Rights: preserving the right of individual petition and promoting constitutionalism’, Public Law, (2013), pp. 710–19.
Dzehtsiarou, K., and O’Meara, N., ‘Advisory jurisdiction and the European Court of Human Rights: a magic bullet for dialogue and docket control?’ Legal Studies, 34 (2014), 444–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckes, C., ‘Does the European Court of Human Rights provide protection from the European Community? – the case of Bosphorus Airways’, European Public Law, 13 (2007), 47–67.Google Scholar
Egeberg, M., and Trondal, J., ‘Differentiated integration in Europe: the case of EEA country, Norway’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(1) (1999), 113–42.Google Scholar
Egli, P., ‘Protocol No. 14 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: towards a more effective control mechanism?’ Journal of Transnational Law and Policy, 17(1) (2007), 1–32.Google Scholar
Eissen, M.-A., ‘The principle of proportionality in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Macdonald, R. J. et al. (eds.), European System, pp. 125–46.
Ellis, E., and Watson, P., EU Anti-Discrimination Law (Oxford University Press, 2nd edn., 2013).Google Scholar
Eriksen, E. O., The Unfinished Democratization of Europe (Oxford University Press, new edn., 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, E. O., ‘Why a Charter of Fundamental Human Rights in the EU?’ Ratio Juris, 16(3) (2003), 352–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M. D., ‘Getting to grips with torture’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 51 (2002), 365–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M. D., Religious Liberty and International Law in Europe (Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M. D., and Morgan, R., Preventing Torture: A Study of the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Everson, M., and Correia Gonçalves, R., ‘Article 16: Freedom to Conduct a Business’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 437–63.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, F., Fundamental Rights in Europe: Challenges and Transformations in Comparative Perspective (Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, F., and Carmona, J., Fundamental Rights in the European Union: The Role of the Charter after the Lisbon Treaty (European Union: European Parliament Research Service, 2015).Google Scholar
Fierro, E., The EU’s Approach to Human Rights Conditionality in Practice (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003).Google Scholar
Fischer, H., Lorion, S., and Ulrich, G., Beyond Activism: The Impact of the Resolutions and Other Activities of the European Parliament in the Field of Human Rights outside the European Union (Venice: Marsilio, 2007).Google Scholar
Føllesdal, A., ‘Much ado about nothing? International judicial review of human rights in well-functioning democracies’ in Føllesdal, A., Schaffer, J., and Ulfstein, G. (eds.), The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Regimes: Legal, Political and Philosophical Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 272–99.Google Scholar
Føllesdal, A., ‘The legitimacy of international human rights review: the case of the European Court of Human Rights’, Journal of Social Philosophy, 40 (2009), 595–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Føllesdal, A., Peters, B., and Ulfstein, G., ‘Conclusions’ in Føllesdal, A., Peters, B., and Ulfstein, G. (eds.), Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Føllesdal, A., Schaffer, J., and Ulfstein, G. (eds.), The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Regimes: Legal, Political and Philosophical Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Fornasier, M., ‘The impact of EU fundamental rights on private relationships: direct or indirect effect?’ European Review of Public Law, (2015), 29–46.
Fouwels, M., ‘The European Union’s common foreign and security policy and human rights’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 15(3) (1997), 291–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, T., ‘Why a quest for legitimacy’, UC Davis Law Review, 21 (1987), 535–47.Google Scholar
Fraser, J., ‘Conclusion: The European Convention on Human Rights as a common European endeavour’ in Flogaitis, S., Zwart, Z., and Fraser, J. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights and Its Discontents: Turning Criticism into Strength (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2013), pp. 192–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furtado, C. F., ‘Guess who’s coming to dinner? Protection for national minorities in the eastern and central Europe under the Council of Europe’, Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 34 (2002–3), 333–411.Google Scholar
Fuster, G. G., The Emergence of Personal Data Protection as a Fundamental Right of the EU (Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbreath, D., The Organization for Security and Co-Operation in Europe (Routledge, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garben, S., ‘The constitutional (im)balance between “the market” and “the social” in the European Union’, European Constitutional Law Review, 13 (2017), 23–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gearty, C., ‘Democracy and human rights in the European Court of Human Rights: a critical appraisal’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 51 (2000), 381–96.Google Scholar
Gerards, J. H., ‘Inadmissibility decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a critique of the lack of reasoning’, Human Rights Law Review, 14 (2014), 148–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerards, J. H., ‘Pluralism: Deference and the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine’, European Law Journal, 17 (2011), 80–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerards, J. H., ‘The discrimination grounds of Article 14 ECHR’, Human Rights Law Review, 13 (2013), 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerards, J. H., ‘The prism of fundamental rights’, European Constitutional Law Review, 8 (2012), 173–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerards, J. H., ‘Who decides on fundamental rights issues in Europe?’ in Weatherill, S., and de Vries, S. (eds.), Five Years Legally Binding EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (Oxford: Hart, 2015), pp. 47–74.Google Scholar
Gerards, J. H., and Terlouw, A., ‘Solutions for the European Court of Human Rights: the Amicus Curiae project’ in Flogaitis, S., Zwart, Z., and Fraser, J. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights and Its Discontents: Turning Criticism into Strength (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2013), pp. 158–82.Google Scholar
Glas, L., ‘Changes in the procedural practice of the European Court of Human Rights: consequences for the convention system and lessons to be drawn’, Human Rights Law Review, 14 (2014), 671–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glas, L., The Theory, Potential and Practice of Procedural Dialogue in the European Convention on Human Rights System (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2016).Google Scholar
Glendon, M. A., ‘Knowing the Universal Declaration of Human Rights’, Notre Dame Law Review, 73 (1998), 1153–90.Google Scholar
Goldoni, M., ‘Constitutional pluralism and the question of the European common good’, European Law Journal, 18 (2012), 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldston, J., ‘Achievements and challenges: insights from the Strasbourg experience for other international courts’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2009), 603–10.
Gordillo, L., Interlocking Constitutions: Towards and Interordinal Theory of National, European and UN Law (Oxford: Hart, 2012).Google Scholar
Gori, G., ‘Article 14: Right to Education’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 401–22.Google Scholar
Grabenwarter, C., ‘Constitutional standard-setting and strengthening of new democracies’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 732–46.Google Scholar
Gragl, P., The Accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford: Hart, 2013).Google Scholar
Greer, S., ‘Being ‘realistic’ about human rights?’ Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 60 (2009), 145–61.Google Scholar
Greer, S., ‘Is the prohibition against torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment really “absolute” in international human rights law’, Human Rights Law Review, 15 (2015), 101–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, S., ‘Protocol 14 and the Future of the European Court of Human Rights’, Public Law, (2005), 83–106.
Greer, S., ‘Reforming the European Convention on Human Rights: towards Protocol 14’, Public Law, (1993), 663–73.
Greer, S., ‘Should police threats to torture suspects always be severely punished? Reflections on the Gäfgen case’, Human Rights Law Review, 11 (2011), 67–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, S., The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and Prospects (Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, S., The Exceptions to Articles 8 to 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, Human Rights Files No. 15, 1997).Google Scholar
Greer, S., The Margin of Appreciation: Interpretation and Discretion under the European Convention on Human Rights (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, Human Rights Files No. 17, 2000).Google Scholar
Greer, S., ‘Universalism and relativism in the protection of human rights in Europe’ in Agha, P. (ed.) Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford: Hart, 2017), pp. 17–36.Google Scholar
Greer, S., and Slowe, R., ‘The Conservatives’ proposals for a British Bill of Rights: mired in muddle, misconception and misrepresentation?’ European Human Rights Law Review, (2015), 370–83.
Greer, S., and Wildhaber, L., ‘Revisiting the debate about “consitutionalising” the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, 12 (2012), 655–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, S., and Wildhaber, L., ‘Reflections of a former president of the European Court of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2010), 165–75.
Greer, S., and Wylde, F., ‘Has the European Court of Human Rights become a “small claims tribunal” and why, if at all, does it matter?’ European Human Rights Law Review, (2017), 146–55.
Gribnau, J., ‘Legitimacy of the judiciary’, Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, 6 (2002), www.ejcl.org/64/art64-3.html.Google Scholar
Grief, N., ‘Non discrimination under the European Convention on Human Rights: a critique of the United Kingdom government’s refusal to sign and ratify Protocol 12’, European Law Review, 27 (2002), 3–18.Google Scholar
Groenendijk, K., ‘Article 40: Right to Vote and Stand as a Candidate at Municipal Elections’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1057–67.Google Scholar
Groussot, X., ‘Constitutional dialogues, pluralism and conflicting identities’ in Avbelj, M., and Komárek, J. (eds.), Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond (Oxford: Hart, 2012), pp. 319–41.Google Scholar
Groussot, X., Arold Lorenz, N. L., and Thor Petursson, G., ‘The paradox of human rights protection in Europe: two courts, one goal?’ in Mjöll Arnardóttir, O., and Buyse, A. (eds.), Shifting Centres of Gravity in Human Rights Protection: Rethinking Relations between the ECHR, EU and National Legal Orders (London: Routledge, 2016), pp. 8–25.Google Scholar
Groussot, X., Lock, T., and Pech, L., ‘EU accession to the European Convention on Human Rights: a legal assessment of the Draft Accession Agreement of 14th October 2011’, European Issues No. 218, 7 November 2011.
Groussot, X., Lock, T., and Petursson, G. T., ‘The reach of EU fundamental rights on member state action after Lisbon’ in de Vries, S. et al. (eds.), The Protection of Fundamental Rights in the EU After Lisbon (Oxford: Hart, 2013), pp. 97–118.Google Scholar
Groussot, X., and Pech, L., ‘Fundamental rights protection in the European Union post Lisbon Treaty’, Policy Papers of the Foundation Robert Schuman (European Issue), 173 (2010).Google Scholar
Guild, E., ‘Article 19: Protection in the Event of Removal’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 543–62.Google Scholar
Guðmundsdóttir, D., ‘A renewed emphasis on the charter’s distinction between rights and principles: is a doctrine of judicial restraint more appropriate?, Common Market Law Review, 52 (2015), 685–720.Google Scholar
Hagemann, S., ‘Strength in numbers? An evaluation of the 2004–2009 European Parliament’, European Policy Centre Issue Paper, 58 (2009).Google Scholar
Halberstam, D., ‘Local, global and plural constitutionalism: Europe meets the world’ in de Búrca, G., and Weiler, J. (eds.), The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 150–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harby, C., ‘The changing nature of interim measures before the European Court of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law, (2010), 73–84.
Harden, I., ‘Article 43: European Ombudsman’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1121–50.Google Scholar
Harmsen, R., ‘The European Convention on Human Rights after enlargement’, International Journal of Human Rights, 5 (2001), 18–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, J. L., ‘In their own image – The Americans and the question of European unity, 1943–1954’ in Bond, M., Smith, J., and Wallace, W. (eds.), Eminent Europeans (London; The Greycoat Press, 1996), pp. 62–84.Google Scholar
Harris, D., O’Boyle, M., Bates, E., and Buckley, C., Harris, O’Boyle and Warbrick: Law of the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Harris, D., O’Boyle, M., Bates, E., and Buckley, C., Harris, O’Boyle and Warbrick: Law of the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 3rd edn., 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, D, O’Boyle, J., M., and Warbrick, C., Law of the European Convention on Human Rights (London: Butterworths, 1995).Google Scholar
Harris, D., and Darcy, J., The European Social Charter (Ardsley: Transnational, 2nd edn., 2000).Google Scholar
Hartkamp, A. S., ‘The concept of (direct and indirect) horizontal effect of EU law’ in Bernitz, U., Groussot, X., and Schulyok, F. (eds.), General Principles of EU Law and European Private Law (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2013) 189–97.Google Scholar
Heidbreder, E. G., The Impact of Expansion on EU Institutions: The Eastern Touch on Brussels (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, L., ‘Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: embeddedness as a deep structural principle of the European human rights regime’, European Journal of International Law, 19 (2008), 125–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, L., ‘The burdens and benefits of Brighton’, European Society of International Law Reflections, 1 (2012), http://esil-sedi.eu/node/138.Google Scholar
Helfer, L., and Slaughter, A.-M., ‘Toward a theory of effective supranational adjudication’, Yale Law Journal, 107 (1997), 273–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heliskoski, J., ‘Fundamental rights versus economic freedoms in the European Union: which paradigm?’ in Klabbers, J., and Petman, J. (eds.), Nordic Cosmopolitism: Essays in International Law for Martti Koskenniemi (Martinus Nijhoff, 2003), pp. 417–43.Google Scholar
Hennette-Vauchez, S., ‘Constitutional v international: when unified reformatory rationales mismatch the plural paths of legitimacy of ECHR law’ in Christoffersen, J., and Madsen, M. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 144–63.Google Scholar
Heringa, A. W., and Verhey, L. F. M., ‘The EU Charter: text and structure’, Maastricht Journal, 8 (2001), 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hervey, T. K., and Kenner, J., Economic and Social Rights under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Legal Perspective (Oxford: Hart, 2006).Google Scholar
Hervey, T. K., and McHale, J., ‘Article 35: Health Care’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 951–68.Google Scholar
Hill, D. M., ‘Human rights and foreign policy: theoretical foundations’ in Hill, D. M. (ed.), Human Rights and Foreign Policy: Theoretical Foundations (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1989), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillebrecht, C., Domestic Politics and International Human Rights Tribunals (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Hillebrecht, C., ‘The power of human rights tribunals: compliance with the European Court of Human Rights and domestic policy change’, European Journal of International Relations, 20 (2014), 1100–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillion, C., ‘Enlarging the European Union and deepening its fundamental rights protection’, SIEPS European Policy Analysis, 11 (2013), pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Hioureas, C., ‘Behind the scenes of Protocol No. 14: politics in reforming the European Court of Human Rights’, Berkeley Journal of International Law, 24(2) (2006), 718–57.Google Scholar
Hirsch-Ziembińska, M., ‘In Pursuit of Good Administration’ (European Conference, Strasbourg, 10 January 2008) DA/ba/Conf (2007).
Hoffmeister, F., ‘Cyprus v. Turkey. App.No. 25781/94. At www.echr.coe.int/Eng/Judgments.htm. European Court of Human Rights, Grand Chamber, May 10, 2001’, American Journal of International Law, 96 (2002), 445–52.CrossRef
Hofman, H. C. H., and Mihaescu, B. C., ‘The relation between the charter’s fundamental rights and the unwritten general principles of EU law: good administration as the test case’, European Constitutional Law Review, 9 (2013), 86–101.Google Scholar
Hogan, G., ‘The right to life and the abortion question under the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Heffernan, L., with Kingston, J. (eds.), Human Rights: A European Perspective (Blackrock: Round Hall Press, 1994), pp. 104–16.Google Scholar
Hovius, B., ‘The limitation clauses of the European Convention on Human Rights: a guide for the application of Section 1 of the charter?’ Ottowa Law Review, 17 (1985), 213–61.Google Scholar
Huber, D., A Decade Which Made History: The Council of Europe 1989–1999 (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 1999).Google Scholar
Hurrell, A., On Global Order: Power, Values and the Constitution of International Society (Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, M. R., ‘The margin of appreciation doctrine in the European Court of Human Rights’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 48 (1999), 638–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ionescu, G., The New Politics of European Integration (London: Macmillan, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson Preece, J., Minority Rights (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Jackson Preece, J., National Minorities and the European Nation-States System (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, F. G., ‘Human rights in the European Union: the role of the Court of Justice’, European Law Review, 26 (2001), 331–41.Google Scholar
Jacobs, F. G., ‘The “limitation clauses” of the European Convention on Human Rights’ in de Mestral, A., Birks, S., Bothe, M., Cotler, I., Klinck, D., and Morel, A. (eds.), The Limitation of Human Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law (Cowansville: Les Éditions Yvon Blais Inc., 1986), pp. 21–40.Google Scholar
Jacqué, J. P., ‘The explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1715–24.Google Scholar
Jaklic, K., Constitutional Pluralism in the EU (Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. H., ‘The devaluation of human rights under the European Convention’, Public Law, (1995), 430–49.
Jowell, J., ‘The Venice Commission: disseminating democracy through law’, Public Law, (2001), 675–83.
Judt, T., Postwar: A History of Europe since 1945 (London: Pimlico, 2005).Google Scholar
Kamminga, M. T., ‘Is the European Convention on Human Rights sufficiently equipped to cope with gross and systematic violations?’ Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 12 (1994), 153–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, H., and Stone Sweet, A. (eds.), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Kenner, J., ‘Article 30: Protection in the Event of Unjustified Dismissal’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 805–32.Google Scholar
Kerr, Lord., ‘The need for dialogue between national courts and the European Court of Human Rights’ in Flogaitis, S., Zwart, T., and Fraser, J. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights and Its Discontents: Turning Criticism into Strength (Edward Elgar, 2013), pp. 104–34.Google Scholar
Khadar, L., and Shaw, J., ‘Article 39: Right to Vote and Stand as a Candidate at Elections to the European Parliament’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1027–56.Google Scholar
Khan-Nisser, S., ‘Conditionality, communication and compliance: the effect of monitoring on collective labour rights in candidate countries’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(6) (2013), 1040–56.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, C., ‘Article 21: Non-Discrimination’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 579–603.Google Scholar
Kinzelbach, K., ‘The EU’s human rights dialogues - talking to persuade or silencing the debate?’ presented at the Kolleg-Forschergruppe (KFG) Conference: The Transformative Power of Europe at Freie Univesität Berlin, 10–11 December 2009).
Kinzelbach, K., The EU’s Human Rights Dialogue with China: Quiet Diplomacy and Its Limits, vol. VII (Abingdon: Routledge, 2015).Google Scholar
Kitzinger, U. W., The Politics and Economics of European Integration (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Klabbers, J., Peters, A., and Ulfstein, G., The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinsorge, T., ‘General overview’ in Kleinsorge, T. (ed.), Council of Europe (CoE) (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2nd edn., 2015), pp. 71–4.Google Scholar
Kleinsorge, T., ‘The Parliamentary Assembly: Europe’s motor and conscience’ in Kleinsorge, T. (ed.), Council of Europe (CoE) (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2nd edn., 2015), pp. 75–95.Google Scholar
Kleinsorge, T., ‘The CoE’s activities’ in Kleinsorge, T. (ed.), Council of Europe (CoE) (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2nd edn., 2015), pp. 105–15.Google Scholar
Klerk, Y. S.,’Supervision of the execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights—the Committee of Ministers’ Role under Article 54 of the European Convention on Human Rights’, Netherlands International Law Review, 45 (1998), 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochenov, D., and Pech, L. ‘Monitoring and enforcement of the rule of law in the EU: rhetoric and reality’, European Constitutional Law Review, 11(3) (2015), 512–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, R., ‘The jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on detention and fair trial in criminal matters from 1992 to the end of 1998’, Human Rights Law Journal, 21 (2000), 348–73.Google Scholar
Kopecky, P., and Ucen, P., ‘Return to Europe? Patterns of Euroscepticism among the Czech and Slovak political parties’ in Rupnik, J., and Zielonka, J. (eds.), The Road to the European Union. vol. I. The Czech and Slovak Republics (Manchester University Press, 2003), 164–79.Google Scholar
Korkeakivi, A., updated by Altenhöner-Dion, C., ‘The CoE and the protection of national minorities’ in Kleinsorge, T. (ed.), Council of Europe (CoE) (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2nd edn., 2015), pp. 183–93.Google Scholar
Kosta, V, Skoutaris, N., and Tzevelekos, V. (eds.), The EU Accession to the ECHR (Oxford: Hart, 2014).Google Scholar
Kranenborg, H., ‘Article 8: Protection of Personal Data’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 223–66.Google Scholar
Kratochvíl, J., ‘The inflation of the margin of appreciation by the European Court of Human Rights’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 29 (2011) 324–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, H., ‘The Conference of International Non-Governmental Organizations of the Council of Europe’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), 314–44.Google Scholar
Krisch, N., Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krisch, N., ‘The case for pluralism in postnational law’ in de Búrca, G., and Weiler, J. (eds.), The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 203–61.Google Scholar
Krish, N., ‘The open architecture of European human rights law’, Modern Law Review, 71 (2008), 183–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krommendijk, J., ‘Principled silence or mere silence on principles?’ European Constitutional Law Review, 11 (2015), 321–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krommendijk, J., ‘The use of European Court of Human Rights case law by the Court of Justice after Lisbon: the view of Luxembourg insiders’, Maastricht Journal, 22 (2015), 812–35.Google Scholar
Kühling, J., ‘Fundamental rights’ in Von Bogdandy, A., and Bast, J. (eds.), Principles of European Constitutional Law (Oxford: Hart/C. H. Beck, 2nd rev. edn., 2010), pp. 479–514.Google Scholar
Kumm, M., ‘The jurisprudence of constitutional conflict: constitutional supremacy in Europe before and after the constitutional treaty’, European Law Journal, 11 (2005), 262–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladenburger, C., ‘European Union institutional report’ in Laffranque, J. (ed.), The Protection of Fundamental Rights Post-Lisbon (Tartu University Press, 2012), pp. 141–215.Google Scholar
Lambert-Abdelgawad, E., ‘The Court as a part of the Council of Europe: the Parliamentary Assembly and the Committee of Ministers’ in Føllesdal, A., Peters, B., and Ulfstein, G. (eds.), Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 263–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert-Abdelgawad, E., The Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, Human Rights Files No. 19, 2002).Google Scholar
Lambrecht, S., ‘Chapter 19 – Assessing the existence of criticism of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Popelier, P., Lambrecht, S., and Lemmens, K. (eds.), Criticism of the European Court of Human Rights – Shifting the Convention System: Counter-Dynamics at the National and EU Level (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2016), pp. 544–6.Google Scholar
Lamont, R., ‘Article 24: The Rights of the Child’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 661–91.Google Scholar
Landau, E. C., ‘New regime of human rights in the EU’, European Journal of Law Reform, 10 (2008), 557–76.Google Scholar
Lautenbach, G., The Concept of the Rule of Law and the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavender, N., ‘The problem of the margin of appreciation’, European Human Rights Law Review, (1997), 380–90.
Leach, P., ‘Access to the European Court of Human Rights – from a legal entitlement to a lottery?’ Human Rights Law Journal, 27 (2006), 11–25.Google Scholar
Leach, P., ‘No longer offering fine mantras to a parched child? The European Court’s developing approach to remedies’ in Føllesdal, A., Peters, B., and Ulfstein, G. (eds.), Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 142–80.Google Scholar
Leach, P., ‘On the reform of the European Court of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2009), 725–35.
Leach, P., ‘The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 181–91.Google Scholar
Leach, P., Hardman, H., and Stephenson, S., ‘Can the European Court’s pilot judgment procedure help resolve systemic human rights violations? Burdov and the failure to implement domestic court decisions in Russia’, Human Rights Law Review, 10(2) (2010), 346–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, P., Hardman, H., Stephenson, S., and Blitz, B. K., Responding to Systematic Human Rights Violations – An Analysis of ‘Pilot Judgments’ of the European Court of Human Rights and Their Impact at National Level (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2010).Google Scholar
Leach, P., Paraskeva, C., and Uzelac, G., ‘Human rights fact-finding: the European Court of Human Rights at the crossroads’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 28 (2010), 41–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebeck, C., ‘The European Court of Human Rights on the relation between ECHR and EC-law: the limits of constitutionalisation of public international law’, Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Rectht, 62 (2007), 195–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leconte, C., ‘The EU fundamental rights policy as a source of Euroscepticism’, Human Rights Review, 15(1) (2014), 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leconte, C., and Muir, E., ‘Introduction to special issue “Understanding resistance to the EU fundamental rights policy”’, Human Rights Review, 15(1) (2014), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leczykiewiecz, D., ‘Horizontal effect of fundamental rights: in search of social justice or private autonomy in EU law?’ in Bernitz, U., Groussot, X., and Schulyok, F. (eds.), General Principles of EU Law and European Private Law (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2013), pp. 171–86.Google Scholar
Legg, A., The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law: Deference and Proportionality (Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leijten, A. E. M., Core Rights and the Protection of Socio-Economic Interests by the European Court of Human Rights (Meijers Research Institute and Graduate School of the Leiden Law School, Faculty of Law, Leiden University, 2015).Google Scholar
Lemmens, K., ‘Chapter 2 – criticising the European Court of Human Rights or misunderstanting the dynamics of human rights protection?’ in Popelier, P., Lambrecht, S., and Lemmens, K. (eds.), Criticism of the European Court of Human Rights – Shifting the Convention System: Counter-Dynamics at the National and EU Level (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2016), pp. 27–8.Google Scholar
Lemmens, P., ‘The relation between the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the European Convention on Human Rights – substantive aspects’, Maastricht Journal, 8 (2001), 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenaerts, K., ‘Exploring the limits of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’, European Constitutional Law Review, 6 (2012), 375–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenaerts, K., and de Smijter, E., ‘The charter and the role of the European courts’, Maastricht Journal, 8 (2001), 90–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letsas, G., ‘Two concepts of the margin of appreciation’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26 (2006), 705–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lezertua, M., and Forde, A., updated by Sidaropoulos, N., ‘The Commissioner for Human Rights’ in Kleinsorge, T. (ed.), Council of Europe (CoE) (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2nd edn., 2015), pp. 116–23.Google Scholar
Liisberg, J. B., ‘Does the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights threaten the supremacy of community law?’ Common Market Law Review, 38 (2001), 1171–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindfeldt, M., ‘Article 44: Right to Petition’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1151–60.Google Scholar
Livingstone, S., ‘Article 14 and the prevention of discrimination in the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review, (1997), 25–34.
Lock, T., ‘Beyond Bosphorus: The European Court of Human Rights case law on the responsibility of member states of international organisations under the European Convention on Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, 10 (2010), 529–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lock, T., ‘End of an epic? The draft agreement on the EU’s accession to the ECHR’, Yearbook of European Law, 31 (2012), 162–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lock, T., ‘The future of EU accession to the ECHR after Opinion 2/13: is it still possible and is it still desirable?’ European Constitutional Law Review, 11(2) (2015), 239–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, K., Verfassungslehre (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1959).Google Scholar
Loucaides, L. G., ‘The judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Cyprus v. Turkey’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 15 (2002), 225–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovecy, J., ‘Framing decisions in the Council of Europe: An institutional analysis’ in Reinalda, B., and Verbeek, B. (eds.), Decision Making within International Organizations (London: Routledge, 2004), 59–73.Google Scholar
Lundestad, G., “Empire” by Integration: The United States and European Integration, 1945–1997 (Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
MacMullen, A., ‘Intergovernmental functionalism? The Council of Europe in European integration’, Journal of European Integration, 26 (2004), 405–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, M., ‘From Cold War instrument to supreme European court: the European Court of Human Rights at the crossroads of international and national law and politics’, Law and Social Inquiry, 32 (2007), 137–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maduro, M., ‘Contrapuntal law: Europe’s constitutional pluralism in Action’ in Walker, N. (ed.), Sovereignty in Transition (Oxford: Hart, 2003), 502–37.Google Scholar
Maduro, M., ‘Interpreting European law: judicial adjudication in a context of constitutional pluralism’, European Journal of Legal Studies, 1 (2007) 2, 137–52.Google Scholar
Maduro, M., We the Court (Oxford: Hart, 1998).Google Scholar
Mahoney, P., ‘An Insider’s View of the Reform Debate’, paper presented at the Symposium on the Reform of the European Court of Human Rights, Strasbourg, 17 November 2003.
Mahoney, P., ‘Judicial Activism and Judicial Self-Restraint in the European Court of Human Rights: two sides of the same coin’, Human Rights Law Journal, 11 (1990), 57–88.Google Scholar
Mahoney, P., ‘New Challenges for the European Court of Human Rights Resulting from Expanding Case Load and Membership’, Conference on Human Rights – Dynamic Dimension, London, 27 April 2002.
Mahoney, P., ‘Speculating on the future of the reformed European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Journal, 20 (1999), 1–4.Google Scholar
Mahoney, P., ‘The relationship between the Strasbourg court and the national courts’, Law Quarterly Review, 130 (2014), 568–86.Google Scholar
Mahoney, P., ‘The European Court of Human Rights and its ever-growing caseload: preserving the mission of the Court while ensuring the viability of the individual petition’ in Flogaitis, S., Mahoney, P., et al., ‘The doctrine of the margin of appreciation under the European Convention on Human Rights: its legitimacy in theory and application in practice’ (Council of Europe internal seminar), Human Rights Law Journal, 19 (1998), 1–36.Google Scholar
Mak, C., ‘Unchart(er)ed territory – EU fundamental rights and national private law’ in Hartkamp, A. S. et al. (eds.), The Influence of EU Law on National Private Law (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2014), pp. 323–53.Google Scholar
Malloy, T. E., National Minority Rights in Europe (Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manas, J. E., ‘The Council of Europe’s democracy ideal and the challenge of ethno-national strife’ in Chayes, A., and Chayes, A. H. (eds.), Preventing Conflict in the Post-Communist World – Mobilizing International and Regional Organizations (Washington, DC: Brookings Occasional Papers, Brookings Institution, 1996), pp. 99–144.Google Scholar
Manners, I. A., ‘The normative ethics of the European Union’, International Affairs, 84(1) (2008), 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, S., ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and its “democratic society”’, British Yearbook of International Law, 66 (1995), 209–38.Google Scholar
Marston, G., ‘The United Kingdom’s part in the preparation of the European Convention on Human Rights 1950’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 42 (1993), 796–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Torrón, J., ‘The European Court of Human Rights and religion’, Current Legal Issues, (2001), 185–204.
Martinico, G., and Pollicino, O., The Interaction between Europe’s Legal Systems: Judicial Dialogue and the Creation of Supranational Laws (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, J., ‘Proportionality and the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Ellis, E. (ed.), The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe (Oxford: Hart, 1999), pp. 23–35.Google Scholar
McCormick, J., Understanding the European Union: A Concise Introduction (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 6th edn., 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrea, R., ‘Article 10: Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 291–309.Google Scholar
McHarg, A., ‘Reconciling human rights and the public interest: conceptual problems and doctrinal uncertainty in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, Modern Law Review, 62 (1999), 671–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendes, J., ‘Good Administration in EU Law and the European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour’, EU Working Papers 2009/09 (European University Institute, Florence, Department of Law).
Meron, T., and Sloan, J. S., ‘Democracy, rule of law and admission to the Council of Europe’, Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, 26 (1997).Google Scholar
Miara, L., and Prais, V., ‘The role of civil society in the execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2012), 528–53.
Michalowski, S., ‘Article 3: Right to the Integrity of the Person’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 39–60.Google Scholar
Mitsilegas, V., ‘Article 49: Principles of Legality and Proportionality’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1351–71.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, A., ‘The origins of human rights regimes: democratic delegation in postwar Europe’, International Organisation, 54 (2000), 217–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreham, N., ‘The right to respect for private life in the European Convention on Human Rights: a re-examination’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2008), 44–79.
Morgan, K., Labour in Power (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Morgan, R., and Evans, M., Combating Torture in Europe: The Work and Standards of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2001).Google Scholar
Morgera, E., and Marín Durán, G., ‘Environmental protection’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 983–1003.Google Scholar
Møse, E., ‘New rights for the new Court?’ in Mahoney, P., Matscher, F., Petzold, H., and Wildhaber, L. (eds.), Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective – Studies in Memory of Rolv Ryssdal (Cologne: Carl Heymans, 2000), pp. 943–56.Google Scholar
Mowbray, A., ‘An examination of the work of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights’, Public Law, (2007) 507–28.
Mowbray, A., ‘Proposals for reform of the European Court of Human Rights’, Public Law, (2002), 252–64.
Mowbray, A., The Development of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights by the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford: Hart, 2004).Google Scholar
Mowbray, A., ‘The Interlaken Declaration – The beginning of a new era for the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, 10 (2010), 519–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowbray, A., ‘The role of the European Court of Human Rights in the promotion of democracy’, Public Law, (1999), 703–25.
Muir, E., ‘The fundamental rights implications of EU legislation: some constitutional challenges’, Common Market Law Review, 51(1) (2014), 219–45.Google Scholar
Muir, E., ‘The transformative function of EU equality law’, European Review of Public Law, (2013), 1231–54.
Müller, J.-W., ‘Safeguarding Democracy Inside the EU: Brussels and the Future of Liberal Order’, Transatlantic Academy 2012–2013 Paper Studies No. 3 (2013).
Murdoch, J., ‘Tackling ill-treatment in places of detention: the work of the Council of Europe’s “Torture Committee”’, European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 12 (2006), 121–42.Google Scholar
Murdoch, J., ‘The impact of Europe’s “Torture Committee” and the evolution of standard-setting in relation to places of detention’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2006), 159–79.
Naert, F., ‘Accountability for violations of human rights law by EU forces’ in Blockmans, S. (ed.), The European Union and Crisis Management: Policy and Legal Aspects (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press, 2008), 375–93.Google Scholar
Napoli, D., ‘The European Union’s foreign policy and human rights’ in Neuwahl, N. A., and Rosas, A. (eds.), The European Union and Human Rights (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1995), 297–312.Google Scholar
Nehl, H. P., ‘Article 48: Presumption of Innocence and Right of Defence (Administrative Law)’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1277–301.Google Scholar
Nicol, D., ‘Original intent and the European Convention on Human Rights’, Public Law, (2005), 152–72.
Nolan, A., ‘“Aggravated violations”, Roma housing rights and forced expulsions in Italy: recent developments under the European Social Charter Collective Complaints System’, European Human Rights Law Review, 11 (2011), 343–6.Google Scholar
Novitz, T., ‘Are social rights necessarily collective rights? A critical analysis of the collective complaints protocol to the European Social Charter’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2002), 50–66.
Novitz, T., ‘Remedies for violation of social rights within the Council of Europe: the significant absence of a court’ in Kilpatrick, C., Novitz, T., and Skidmore, P. (eds.), The Future of Remedies in Europe (Oxford: Hart, 2000), pp. 231–51.Google Scholar
Nowak, M., ‘The agency and national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights’ in Alston, P., and de Schutter, O. (eds.), Monitoring Fundamental Rights in the EU: The Contribution of the Fundamental Rights Agency (Oxford: Hart, 2005), 91–130.Google Scholar
Nowak, M., and Charbord, A., ‘Article 4: Prohibition of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 61–99.Google Scholar
Nowak, T., ‘Of garbage cans and rulings: judgments of the European Court of Justice in the EU legislative process’, West European Politics, 33(4) (2010), 753–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nugent, N., The Government and Politics of the European Union (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 7th edn., 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oeter, S., ‘Conventions on the Protection of National Minorities’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 542–71.Google Scholar
O’Brien, C., ‘Article 26: Integration of Persons with Disabilities’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 709–48.Google Scholar
O’Cinneide, C., ‘Article 25: The Rights of the Elderly’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 693–708.Google Scholar
Odermatt, J., ‘A giant step backwards? Opinion 2/13 on the EU’s accession to the European Convention on Human Rights’, New York University Journal of Law and Politics, 47 (2015), 783–98.Google Scholar
Ojanen, T., ‘Making the essence of fundamental rights real: the Court of Justice of the European Union clarifies the structure of fundamental rights under the charter’, European Constitutional Law Review, 12 (2016), 318–29.Google Scholar
Olsen, C., updated by Kleinsorge, T., ‘Treaty-making in the CoE’ in Kleinsorge, T. (ed.), Council of Europe (CoE) (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2nd edn., 2015), pp. 143–55.Google Scholar
Oomen, B., ‘A serious case of Strasbourg-bashing? An evaluation of the debates on the legitimacy of human rights in the Netherlands’, International Journal of Human Rights, 20 (2016), 407–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ost, F., ‘The original canons of interpretation of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Delmas-Marty, M., and Chodkiewicz, C. (eds.), The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights: International Protection Versus National Restrictions (Dortrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1992), pp. 238–318.Google Scholar
Palmer, S., ‘The Committee of Ministers’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 137–65.Google Scholar
Palmer, S., updated by Poirel, C., ‘Committee of Ministers’ in Kleinsorge, T. (ed.), Council of Europe (CoE) (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2nd edn., 2015), pp. 96–104.Google Scholar
Parry, R., ‘History, human rights and multilingual citizenship: conceptualising the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 61 (2010), 329–48.Google Scholar
Paulus, A., ‘From implementation to translation: applying the European Court of Human Rights Judgments in the domestic legal orders’ in Seibert-Fohr, A., and Villiger, M. (eds.), Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights – Effects and Implementation (Baden-Baden: Nomos/Ashgate, 2013), pp. 267–83.Google Scholar
Pedain, A., ‘The human rights dimension of the Diane Pretty case’, Cambridge Law Journal, 62 (2003), 181–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peers, S., and Prechal, S., ‘Article 52 – Scope and Interpretation of Rights and Principles’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1455–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights (Oxford: Hart, 2004).Google Scholar
Pentassuglia, G., ‘Monitoring minority rights in Europe: the implementation machinery of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities – with special reference to the role of the advisory committee’, International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 6 (1991), 417–61.Google Scholar
Pescatore, P., ‘Fundamental rights and the system of the European communities’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 18 (1970), 343–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petaux, J., Democracy and Human Rights for Europe: The Council of Europe’s Contribution (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publications, 2009).Google Scholar
Peterson, J., and Shackleton, M., The Institutions of the European Union (Oxford University Press, 3rd edn., 2012).Google Scholar
Petzold, H., “The convention and the principle of subsidiarity” in Macdonald, R. St. J., Matscher, F., and Petzold, H. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Dortrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1993), pp. 41–62.Google Scholar
Phillips, A., ‘The 10th anniversary of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities’, Euopäiasches Journal für Minderheitenfragen, 3 (2008), 181–9.Google Scholar
Polakiewicz, J., ‘The European Union and the Council of Europe – Competition or Coherence in Fundamental Rights Protection in Europe?’ Jean Monnet Conference, 27–28 May 2008.
Popelier, P., Van de Heyning, C., and Van Nuffel, P. (eds.), Human Rights Protection in the European Legal Order: The Between the European and the National Courts (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2011).Google Scholar
Popovic, D., ‘Prevailing of judicial activism over self-restraint in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, Creighton Law Review, 42 (2009), 361–96.Google Scholar
Portela, C., and Orbie, J., ‘Sanctions under the EU generalised system of preferences and foreign policy: coherence by accident?’ Contemporary Politics, 20(1) (2014), 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portela, C., and Vennesson, P., ‘Sanctions and embargos in EU-Asia relations’ in Christiansen, T., Kirchner, E., and Murray, P. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of EU-Asia Relations (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan, 2013), 198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prebensen, S. C., ‘Inter-state complaints under treaty provisions – the experience under the European Convention on Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Journal, 20 (1999), 446–55.Google Scholar
Prebensen, S. C., ‘Evolutive interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Mahoney, P., Matscher, F., Petzold, H., and Wildhaber, L. (eds.), Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective – Studies in Memory of Rolv Ryssdal (Cologne: Carl Heymans, 2000), pp. 1123–37.Google Scholar
Prechal, S., ‘Competence creep and general principles of law’, Review of European Administrative Law, 3 (2010), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prechal, S., de Vries, S., and van Eijken, H., ‘The principle of attributed powers and the “scope of EU law”’ in Besselink, L., et al. (eds.), The Eclipse of the Legality Principle in the European Union (Kluwer Law International, 2010), pp. 213–47.Google Scholar
Prodi, R., ‘A wider Europe: a proximity policy as the key to stability’, speech to the Sixth ECSA World Conference in Brussels, 5–6 December 2002 (SPEECH/02/619).
Provost, R., ‘Teetering on the edge of legal nihilism: Russia and the evolving European human rights regime’, Human Rights Quarterly, 37 (2015), 289–40.Google Scholar
Rainey, B., Wicks, E., and Ovey, C., Jacobs, White and Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 6th edn., 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reidy, A., Hampson, F., and Boyle, K., ‘Gross violations of human rights: invoking the European Convention on Human Rights in the case of Turkey’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 15 (1997), 161–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reneman, M., EU Asylum Procedures and the Right to an Effective Remedy (Oxford: Hart, 2014).Google Scholar
Ringelheim, J., ‘Minority rights in a time of multiculturlism – the evolving scope of the Framework Convention on the Protection of National Minorities’, Human Rights Law Review, 10(1) (2010), 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. H., The Council of Europe: Its Structure, Functions and Achievements (London: Stevens & Sons, 2nd edn., 1961).Google Scholar
Roos, C., and Orsini, G., ‘How to Reconcile the EU Border Paradox? The Concurrence of Refugee Reception and Deterrence’, Institute for European Studies Policy Brief 4/2015 (Brussels: Vrije Universitei, 2015).Google Scholar
Royer, A., The Council of Europe (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2010).Google Scholar
Ruffert, M., ‘Secretariat’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 212–23.Google Scholar
Ryngaert, C., ‘Oscillating between embracing and avoiding Bosphorus: the European Court of Human Rights on member state responsibility for acts of international organisations and the case of the EU’, European Law Review, 39 (2014), 176–92.Google Scholar
Ryssdal, R., ‘On the Road to a European Constitutional Court’, Winston Churchill Lecture on the Council of Europe, Florence, 21 June 1991, quoted in Alkema, E. A., ‘The European Convention as a constitution and its Court as a constitutional court’ in Mahoney, P., Matscher, F., Petzold, H., and Wildhaber, L. (eds.), Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective – Studies in Memory of Rolv Ryssdall (Cologne: Carl Heymans, 2000), pp. 41–63.Google Scholar
Ryssdall, R., ‘Opinion: the coming of age of the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review, (1996), 18–29.
Sadurski, W., ‘Partnering with Strasbourg: constitutionalization of the European Court of Human Rights, the accession of central and east european states to the Council of Europe, and the idea of pilot judgments’, Human Rights Law Review, 9 (2009), 397–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadurski, W., Rights before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe (Dordrecht: Springer, 2005).Google Scholar
Safjan, M., and Miklasziewicz, P., ‘Horizontal effect of the general principles of EU law in the sphere of private law’, European Review of Public Law, (2010), 475–86.
Sainati, T., ‘Human rights class actions: rethinking the pilot-judgment procedure at the European Court of Human Rights’, Harvard International Law Journal, 56 (2015), 147–206.Google Scholar
Sardaro, P., ‘Jus non dicere for allegations of serious violations of human rights: questionable trends in the recent case law of the Strasbourg Court’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2003), 601–30.
Sargentini, J., and Dimitrovs, A., ‘The European Parliament’s role: towards new Copenhagen criteria for existing member states?’ Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(5), 1085–92.
Sarmiento, D., ‘The silent lamb and the deaf wolves’ in Avbelj, M., and Komárek, J. (eds.), Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond (Oxford University Press, 2012) 285–318, pp. 285–317.Google Scholar
Sarmiento, D., ‘Who’s Afraid of the charter? The Court of Justice, national courts and the New Framework of Fundamental Rights Protection in Europe’, Common Market Law Review, 50 (2013), 1267–304.Google Scholar
Sayers, D., ‘Article 13: Freedom of the Arts and Sciences’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 379–400.Google Scholar
Sayers, D., ‘Article 48: Presumption of Innocence and Right of Defence (Criminal Law)’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1303–49.Google Scholar
Schabas, W., The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Scheuner, U., ‘Fundamental rights in European Community law and in national constitutional law’, Common Market Law Review, 12 (1975), 171–91.Google Scholar
Schiek, D., ‘Article 23: Equality between Women and Men’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 633–60.Google Scholar
Schiek, D., ‘Intersectionality and the notion of disability in EU discrimination law’, Common Market Law Review, 53 (2016), 35–64.Google Scholar
Schill, S., ‘Overcoming absolute primacy: respect for national identity under the Lisbon Treaty’, Common Market Law Review, 48 (2011), 1417–54.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F., Engbert, S., and Knobel, H., International Socialization in Europe: European Organizations, Political Conditionality, and Democratic Change (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmahl, S., ‘The Council of Europe within the system of international organizations’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 874–945.Google Scholar
Schokkenbroek, J., ‘The prohibition of discrimination in Article 14 of the Convention and the margin of appreciation’, Human Rights Law Journal, 19 (1998), 20–3.Google Scholar
Schwellnus, G., ‘Social rights: The EU and ILO’ in Falkner, G., and Müller, P. (eds.) EU Policies in a Global Perspective: Shaping or Taking International Regimes? (London: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar
Scott-Moncrieff, L., ‘Editorial – Language and the law: reclaiming the human rights debate’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2013), 115–21.
Sedelmeier, U., ‘Anchoring democracy from above? The European Union and democratic backsliding in Hungary and Romania after accession’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1) (2014), 105–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seibert-Fohr, A., and Villiger, M., ‘Current challenges in European multilevel human rights protection’ in Seibert-Fohr, A., and Villiger, M. (eds.), Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights – Effects and Implementation (Baden-Baden: Nomos/Ashgate, 2013), pp. 13–24.Google Scholar
Senden, H. C. K., Interpretation of Fundamental Rights in a Multilevel Legal System (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2011).Google Scholar
Senden, L. A. J., ‘Soft law and its implications for institutional balance in the EC’, Utrecht Law Review, 1(2) (2005), 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shany, Y., ‘Assessing the effectiveness of international courts – a goal-based approach’, American Journal of International Law, 106 (2012), 225–70.Google Scholar
Shaw, J., and Khadar, L., ‘Article 12(2): Freedom of Assembly and Association’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 371–7.Google Scholar
Sicilianos, L. I., ‘The involvement of the European Court of Human Rights in the implementation of its judgments: recent developments under Article 46 ECHR’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 32 (2014), 235–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieburgh, C., ‘A method to substantively guide the involvement of EU primary law in private law matters’, European Review of Public Law, (2013), 1165–88.
Sieburgh, C., ‘General principles and the charter in private law relationships’ in Bernitz, U., Groussot, X., and Schulyok, F. (eds.), General Principles of EU Law and European Private Law (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2013), pp. 233–47.Google Scholar
Siegel, A., ‘Beyond Measuring – the Council of Europe’s Instruments Contributing to the Progress of Societies’, OECD World Forum on Measuring and Fostering Progress of Societies, Istanbul, 23–30 June 2007.
Sikkink, K., ‘The power of principled ideas: human rights policies in the United States and Western Europe’ in Goldstein, J., and Keohane, R. O. (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change (New York: Cornell University Press, 1993), pp. 139–70.Google Scholar
Simor, J., and Emmerson, B. (eds.), Human Rights Practice (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2000).Google Scholar
Simpson, A. W. B., ‘Britain and the European Convention’, Cornell International Law Journal, 34 (2001), 523–54.Google Scholar
Simpson, A. W. B., Human Rights and the End of Empire – Britain and the Genesis of the European Convention (Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Simpson, A. W. B., ‘Hersch Lauterpacht and the genesis of the age of human rights’, Law Quarterly Review, 120 (2004), 49–80.Google Scholar
Sjursen, H., ‘Enlargement in perspective. The EU’s quest for identity’, Recon Online Working Paper 2007/15.
Smith, K. E., ‘The conditional offer of membership as an instrument of EU foreign policy: reshaping Europe in the EU’s image?’ Marmara Journal of European Studies, 33 (2000), 1301–59.Google Scholar
Smith, K. E., ‘The EU as a diplomatic actor in the field of human rights’ in Koops, J., and Macaj, G. (eds.), The European Union as a Diplomatic Actor (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), 155–77.Google Scholar
Smith, K. E., ‘The European Union at the Human Rights Council: speaking with one voice but having little influence’, Journal of European Public Policy, 17(2) (2010), 224–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K. E., ‘The use of political conditionality in the EU’s relations with third countries: how effective?’ SPS Working Paper 1997/7 (San Domenico di Fiesole: EUI, 1997), 1–37.Google Scholar
Smith, K. E., European Union Foreign Policy in a Changing World (London: Polity Press, 3rd edn., 2014).Google Scholar
Smith, M., ‘Developing administrative principles in the EU: a foundational model of legitimacy?’, European Law Journal, 18(2) (2012), 269–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, J., ‘Fundamental rights review of national measures: nothing new under the charter?’ European Public Law, 21 (2015), 285–308.Google Scholar
Söderman, J., ‘Public Hearing before the Convention on the Draft Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’, speech delivered on 2 February 2000 in Brussels.
Spano, R., ‘Universality or diversity of human rights? Strasbourg in the age of subsidiarity’, Human Rights Law Review, 14 (2014), 487–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaventa, E., ‘Article 45: Freedom of Movement and of Residence’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1161–76.Google Scholar
Stalford, H., ‘Article 32: Prohibition of Child Labour and Protection of Young People at Work’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 869–89.Google Scholar
Steyn, Lord., ‘Laying the foundations of human rights law in the United Kingdom’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2005), 349–62.
Stone Sweet, A., ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and national constitutional reordering’, Cardozo Law Review, 33 (2012), 1859–68.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A., ‘The European Court of Justice’ in Craig, P., and de Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford University Press, 2nd edn., 2011), pp. 121–53.Google Scholar
Stubberfield, C., ‘Lifting the Organisational Veil: Positive Obligations of the European Union following accession to the European Convention on Human Rights’, Australian International Legal Journal, 19 (2012), 117–42.Google Scholar
Suchkova, M., ‘An analysis of the institutional arrangements within the Council of Europe and within certain member states for securing the enforcement of judgments’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2011), 448–63.
Sweeney, J. A., ‘Margins of appreciation: cultural relativity and the European Court of Human Rights in the post–Cold War era’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 54 (2005), 459–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweeney, J. A., The European Court of Human Rights in the Post-Cold War Era: Universality in Transition (London: Routledge, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swimelar, S., ‘Approaches to Ethnic Conflict and the Protection of Human Rights in Post-Communist Europe: The Need for Preventive Diplomacy’, Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 7 (2001), 98–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szyszczak, E., ‘Article 36: Access to Services’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 969–82.Google Scholar
Tamm, D., ‘The history of the Court of Justice of the European Union since its origin’ in The Court of Justice of the European Union (ed.), The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-law - La Cour de Justice et la Construction de l’Europe: Analyses et Perspectives de Soixante Ans de Jurisprudence (The Hague: TMC Asser Press, 2013), 9–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thielborger, P., ‘Judicial Passivism at the European Court of Human Rights’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 19 (2012), 341–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorarensen, B., ‘The advisory jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights under Protocol No. 16: enhancing domestic implementation or human rights or a symbolic step’ in Mjöll Arnardóttir, O., and Buyse, A. (eds.), Shifting Centres of Gravity in Human Rights Protection: Rethinking Relations between the ECHR, EU and National Legal Orders (London and New York: Routledge, 2016), pp. 79–100.Google Scholar
Tocci, N., The EU and Conflict Resolution: Promoting Peace in the Backyard (London: Routledge, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toggenburg, G., ‘The EU Charter: moving from a fundamental rights ornament to a European fundamental rights order’ in Palmisano, G. (ed.), Making the Charter of Fundamental Rights a Living Instrument (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2015), 10–29.Google Scholar
Toggenburg, G., ‘The role of the new EU Fundamental Rights Agency: debating the “sex of angels” or improving Europe’s human rights performance?’ European Law Review, 3(385) (2008), 385–98.Google Scholar
Tomkin, J., ‘Article 50: Right Not to Be Tried or Punished Twice in Criminal Proceedings for the Same Criminal Offence’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1373–412.Google Scholar
Tomkins, A., ‘The Committee of Ministers: its roles under the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review, 49 (1995), 49–62.Google Scholar
Torremans, P., ‘Article 17(2): Right to Property’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 489–517.Google Scholar
Torres Pérez, A., Conflicts of Rights in the European Union: A Theory of Supranational Adjudication (Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres Pérez, A., ‘Melloni in three acts: from dialogue to monologue’, European Constitutional Law Review, 10 (2014), 308–31.Google Scholar
Trauner, F., ‘Asylum policy: the EU ‘crises’ and the looming policy regime failure’, Journal of European Integration, 38 (2016), 311–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trechsel, S., ‘Human rights and minority rights – two sides of the same coin? A sketch’ in Mahoney, P., Matscher, F., Petzold, H., and Wildhaber, L. (eds.), Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective – Studies in Memory of Rolv Ryssdal (Cologne: Carl Heymans, 2000), pp. 1443–53.Google Scholar
Trommer, S., and Chari, R., ‘The Council of Europe: interest groups and ideological mission?’ West European Politics, 29 (2006), 665–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsagourias, N. (ed.), Transnational Constitutionalism: International and European Models (Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzevelekos, V., ‘When elephants fight it is the grass that suffers: “hegemonic struggle” in Europe and the side-effects for international law’ in Dzehtsiarou, K., Konstadinides, T., Lock, T., and O’Meara, N. (eds.), Human Rights in Europe: The Influence, Overlaps and Contradictions of the EU and the ECHR (London and New York: Routledge, 2014), pp. 9–34.Google Scholar
Ulfstein, G., ‘The European Court of Human Rights and national courts: a constitutional relationship?’ in Mjöll Arnardóttir, O., and Buyse, A. (eds.), Shifting Centres of Gravity in Human Rights Protection: Rethinking Relations between the ECHR, EU and National Legal Orders (London and New York: Routledge, 2016), pp. 46–58.Google Scholar
Vachudová, M. A., Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage and Integration after Communism (Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Bockel, B., The Ne Bis in Idem Principle in EU Law (Alphen ann de Rijn Kluwer Law International, 2010).Google Scholar
Van Cleynenbreugel, P., ‘Judge-made standards of national procedure in the post-Lisbon constitutional framework’, European Law Review, 37 (2012), 90–100.Google Scholar
Van de Heyning, C., Fundamental Rights lost in complexity, unpublished PhD thesis, Antwerp University, 2011.
Van de Heyning, C., ‘No place like home: discretionary space for the domestic protection of fundamental rights’ in Popelier, P., van de Heyning, C., and van Nuffel, P. (eds.), Human Rights Protection in the European Legal Order: The Interaction between the European and the National Courts (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2011), pp. 65–96.Google Scholar
Van de Heyning, C., and Lawson, R., ‘The EU as a party to the European Convention of (sic) Human Rights: EU law and the European Court of Justice case law as inspiration and challenge to the European Court of Human Rights jurisprudence’ in Popelier, P., Van de Heyning, C., and Van Nuffel, P. (eds.), Human Rights Protection in the European Legal Order: The Interaction between the European and the National Courts (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2011), pp. 35–64.Google Scholar
Van den Berghe, F., ‘The EU and issues of human rights protection: same solutions to more acute problems?’ European Law Journal, 16 (2010), 112–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vested-Hansen, J., ‘Article 7: Respect for Private and Family Life (Private Life, Home and Communications)’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 153–82.Google Scholar
Voeten, E., ‘Domestic implementation of European Court of Human Rights judgments: legal infrastructure and government effectiveness matter: a reply to Dia Anagnostou and Alina Mungiu-Pippidi’, European Journal of International Law, 25 (2014), 229–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voeten, E., ‘Public Opinion and the Legitimacy of International Courts’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 14 (2013), 411–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voeten, E., ‘Politics, judicial behaviour and institutional design’ in Christoffersen, J., and Madsen, M. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 61–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogiatzis, N., ‘The admissibility criterion under Article 35(3)(b) ECHR: a “significant disadvantage” to human rights protection’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 65 (2016), 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Bogdandy, A., ‘The European Union as a human rights organization? Human rights and the core of the European Union’, Common Market Law Review, 37(6) (2000), 1307–38.Google Scholar
Von Bogdandy, A., and Schill, S., ‘Overcoming absolute primacy: respect for national identity under the Lisbon Treaty’, Common Market Law Review, 48 (2011), 1417–54.Google Scholar
Von Bogdandy, A., et al., ‘Reverse Solange – protecting the essence of fundamental rights against EU member states’, Common Market Law Review, 49 (2012), 489–520.Google Scholar
Von Danwitz, T., and Paraschas, K., ‘A fresh start for the charter: fundamental questions on the application of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights’, Fordham International Law Review, 35 (2012), 1396–424.Google Scholar
Vorhaus, J., ‘On degradation. part one. Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights’, Common Law World Review, 31 (2002), 374–99.Google Scholar
Vorhaus, J., ‘On degradation. part two. Degrading Treatment and Punishment’, Common Law World Review, 32 (2003), 65–92.Google Scholar
Walker, N., ‘Reconciling MacCormick: constitutional pluralism and the unity of practical reason’ Ratio Juris, 24 (2011), 369–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, N., ‘The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism’, Modern Law Review, 65 (2002), 317–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, S., ‘Much ado about nothing? The pilot judgment procedure at the European Court of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2011), 71–81.
Walter, C., ‘Combating terrorism and organized crime’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 671–95.Google Scholar
Ward, A., ‘Article 51: Field of Application’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1413–54.Google Scholar
Ward, A., et al., ‘Article 47: Right to an Effective Remedy and to a Fair Trial’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1198–275.Google Scholar
Weatherill, S., ‘Article 38: Consumer Protection’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1005–25.Google Scholar
Weatherill, S., ‘From economic rights to fundamental rights’ in de Vries, S. et al. (eds.), The Protection of Fundamental Rights in the EU after Lisbon (Oxford: Hart, 2013), pp. 11–36.Google Scholar
Weiler, J., ‘In defence of the status quo: Europe’s constitutional Sonderweg’ in Weiler, J., and Wind, M. (eds.), European Constitutionalism beyond the State (Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 7–23.Google Scholar
Weiler, J., ‘Prologue: global and pluralist constitutionalism: some doubts’ in de Búrca, G., and Weiler, J. (eds.), The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 8–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, M. (ed.), The Rights of Minorities: A Commentary on the European Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Weller, M., Vertichel, A., Alen, A., De Witte, B., and Lemmens, P. (eds.), The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities: A Useful Pan-European Instrument? (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2008).Google Scholar
White, R., ‘Article 34: Social Security and Social Assistance’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 927–49.Google Scholar
White, R., and Boussiakou, I., ‘Voices from the European Court of Human Rights’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 27(2) (2009), 167–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, R., and Ovey, C., Jacobs, White and Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 6th edn., 2014).Google Scholar
Whitehead, L., The International Dimensions of Democratization: Europe and the Americas (Oxford University Press, 2nd edn. 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, E., ‘Article 2: Right to Life’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 25–38.Google Scholar
Wicks, E., ‘The United Kingdom government’s perceptions of the European Convention on Human Rights at the time of entry’, Public Law, (2000), 438–55.
Wildhaber, L., ‘A constitutional future for the European Court of Human Rights?’ Human Rights Law Journal, 23 (2002), 161–5.Google Scholar
Wildhaber, L., ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and International Law’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 56 (2007), 217–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildhaber, L., ‘Rethinking the European Court of Human Rights’ in Christoffersen, J., and Madsen, M. (eds.) The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 2014–29.Google Scholar
Wildhaber, L., ‘The role of the European Court of Human Rights: an evaluation’, Mediterranean Journal of Human Rights, 8 (2004), 9–32.Google Scholar
Williams, A., EU Human Rights Policies: A Study in Irony (Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Williams, A., The Ethos of Europe: Values, Law and Justice in the EU (Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A., ‘The European Convention on Human Rights, the EU and the UK: confronting a heresy’, European Journal of International Law, 24 (2013), 1157–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilsher, D., ‘Article 6: Right to Liberty and Security’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 121–52.Google Scholar
Wincott, D., ‘The Court of Justice and the European policy process’ in Richardson, J. (ed.), European Union, Power and Policy-Making (London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
Winkler, G., The Council of Europe: Monitoring Procedures and the Constitutional Autonomy of Member States (Vienna: Springer, 2006).Google Scholar
Wintemute, R., ‘Filling the Article 14 “gap”: government ratification and judicial control of Protocol No. 12 ECHR: part 2’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2004), 484–99.
Wintemute, R., ‘“Within the ambit”: how big is the “gap” in Article 14 European Convention on Human Rights? part 1’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2004), 366–82.
Wissink, M., ‘Interpretation of private law in conformity with EU directives’ in Hartkamp, A. S. et al. (eds.), The Influence of EU Law on National Private Law (Deventer: Kluwer, 2014), pp. 119–58.Google Scholar
Wolfrum, R., and Deutsch, U. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights Overwhelmed by Applications: Problems and Possible Solutions – International Workshop, Heidleberg, 17–18 December 2007 (Berlin: Springer, 2007).Google Scholar
Wollenschläger, F., ‘Article 17(1): Right to Property’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 469–87.Google Scholar
Woods, L., ‘Article 11: Freedom of Expression and Information, in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 311–39.Google Scholar
Wouters, J., and Hermez, M., ‘EU Guidelines on Human Rights as a Foreign Policy Instrument: An Assessment’, Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies Working Paper No. 170 (Leuven: Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies, 2016).Google Scholar
Wright, B., ‘The Europeanisation of Hungary: institutional adjustment and the effects of European Union integration’, POLIS Journal, (2013), 271–331.
Youngs, R. (ed.), Survey of European Democracy Promotion Policies 2000–2006 (Madrid: Fundacíon para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Diálogo Exterior (FRIDE), 2006).Google Scholar
Yourow, H. C., The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence (The Hague: Kluwer, 1996).Google Scholar
Zaru, D., and Guerts, C.-M., ‘Legal framework for EU participation in global human rights governance’ in Wouters, J., Bruyninckx, H., Basu, S., and Schunz, S. (eds.), The European Union and Multilateral Governance: Assessing EU Participation in United Nations Human Rights and Environmental Fora (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoethout, C. M., ‘Margin of appreciation, violation and (in)compatibility: why the European Court of Human Rights might consider using an alternative mode of adjudication’, European Public Law, 20 (2014), 309–30.Google Scholar
Zwart, T., ‘More human rights than Court: why the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights is in need of repair and how it can be done’ in Flogaitis, S., Zwart, Z., and Fraser, J. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights and Its Discontents: Turning Criticism into Strength (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2013), pp. 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar